Next Article in Journal
Neurodevelopmental Consequences of Pediatric Cancer and Its Treatment: The Role of Sleep
Previous Article in Journal
Ultrasound Stimulation Increases Neurite Regeneration in Injured Dorsal Root Ganglion Neurons through Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Activation
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Evidence-Based Physical Therapy for Individuals with Rett Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Department of Public Health, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Brain Sci. 2020, 10(7), 410; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10070410
Submission received: 14 June 2020 / Revised: 25 June 2020 / Accepted: 29 June 2020 / Published: 30 June 2020

Abstract

:
Rett syndrome is a rare genetic disorder that affects brain development and causes severe mental and physical disability. This systematic review analyzes the most recent evidence concerning the role of physical therapy in the management of individuals with Rett syndrome. The review was carried out in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. A total of 17319 studies were found in the main scientific databases. Applying the inclusion/exclusion criteria, 22 studies were admitted to the final phase of the review. Level of evidence of the included studies was assessed using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine—Levels of Evidence guide. Nine approaches to physical therapy for patients with Rett syndrome were identified: applied behavior analysis, conductive education, environmental enrichment, traditional physiotherapy with or without aids, hydrotherapy, treadmill, music therapy, computerized systems, and sensory-based treatment. It has been reported that patients had clinically benefited from the analysed approaches despite the fact that they did not have strong research evidence. According to the results, a multimodal individualized physical therapy program should be regularly recommended to patients with Rett syndrome in order to preserve autonomy and to improve quality of life. However, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm these findings.

1. Introduction

Rett syndrome (RTT) is a rare, progressive neurodevelopmental disorder which mostly affects females; its prevalence is estimated between 1:10000 and 1:15000 [1]. RTT was first described in the medical literature by an Austrian physician named Andreas Rett in 1966 [2]. Nowadays, RTT is considered as a part of a spectrum of disease related to mutation of the methyl CpG binding protein 2 (MECP2) gene, which is located on the long arm (q) of the X chromosome (Xq28). The MECP2 gene codes for a protein that may downregulate the activity of many other genes. Therefore, mutations in MECP2 gene lead to defective epigenetic regulatory molecules [3,4]. The spectrum of MECP2-related phenotypes includes classic RTT, variant RTT, MECP2-related severe neonatal encephalopathy, and Psychosis, Pyramidal signs, Parkinsonism, and Macro-orchidism (PPM)-X syndrome [5,6]. Clinical feature of RTT patients is highly variable [7]. Development generally proceeds normally for about 6 to 18 months after birth; at this point, RTT patients enter a period of developmental stagnation which is followed by loss of previously acquired skills, such as hand movements and ability to communicate. Between 12 months and 4 years after birth, children develop autistic-like behaviors (i.e., lack of interest in social interaction and language regression), problems in general dynamic coordination (ataxia), and stereotypic hand movements, the last of which are considered a hallmark of the disease. During this time period, patients often develop breathing irregularities, such as temporary stopping of breathing (apnea) or hyperventilation syndrome, irregular sleep-wake rhythm, feeding and swallowing difficulties, seizures, and irritability [8,9,10,11]. After this period of rapid deterioration, neurological features stabilize, and some affected children may even show slight improvement in the ability of communicate. In the last stage of the disease, patients develop serious motor impairment, also due to the onset of muscle weakness, joint contractures, and spasticity. A variety of additional symptoms can occur in RTT patients including scoliosis, osteopenia, bowel dysmotility, functional megacolon, obesity, and esotropia [12,13,14,15,16].
Life expectancy for people with RTT depends on the age when symptoms first begin and their severity. Many patients live well into adulthood, although they may require constant care. A 2010 study by Kirby et al. showed that almost all girls with RTT reach the age of 10, with a more than 50 percent chance of reaching age 50 [17].
Symptoms, progression, and severity of people with RTT can vary from one patient to another, leading to a wide range of neuromotor and intellectual disabilities. The management of such disabilities requires a multidisciplinary approach. The RTT multidisciplinary team may include (1) medical and surgical subspecialists, such as pediatricians, neurologists, child neuropsychiatrists, gastroenterologists, physiatrists, and orthopedic surgeons, and (2) allied health professionals, such as dieticians, physiotherapists, speech and occupational therapists, psychologists, and specialized nurses. In addition, alternative and complementary therapies could also be part of the RTT multidisciplinary management program [18].
In accordance with the 2006 guidelines by Lotan, patients with RTT need an individually tailored intervention program for the entire duration of their life [19]. Such a program should be the result of a careful evaluation employed by the group of patient, medical doctors, caregivers and therapists. The intervention program originating from such an evaluation should create a continuous network of human support around the individual with RTT, in order to improve his quality of life by overcoming or reducing limitations.
Physical therapy is a branch of rehabilitation and its aim is to preserve, enhance, or restore movement and physical function impaired or threatened by disease, injury, or disability, using therapeutic exercise, physical modalities, assistive devices, and patient education and training. Physiotherapy is an essential tool in the management of several neuromuscular diseases and genetic disorders, with quite strong evidence of effectiveness [20,21,22,23,24]; its usefulness is even more evident if those pathologies affect children [25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32].
Aim of the present review was to find the current best evidence concerning the role of physical therapy in the management of people with RTT.
The Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) method was used to formulate the clinical query according to the following parameters: (a) Population: RTT patients, (b) Intervention: physical therapy, (c) Comparator: no physical therapy, and (d) Outcome: improvement of functional outcome and quality of life [33].

2. Materials and Methods

This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) [34].

2.1. Study Eligibility Criteria and Report Eligibility Criteria

Letters, comments, editorials, conference proceedings, and practice guidelines were not considered for this systematic review. Studies were not limited to any particular design. The following study eligibility criteria were applied: (a) patients of any age affected by RTT; (b) physical therapy applied to at least a proportion of the patients; (c) adequate data provided; (d) no limits applied as to the minimum length of the follow-up. The criteria for the report were as follows: (a) written in the English language; (b) including already published data; and (c) including studies published from January 2000 up until December 2019.

2.2. Information Sources

For the purpose of identifying relevant studies, a systematic review of the literature was performed using the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, PeDro, and Google Scholar. The literature search was conducted by two investigators independently.

2.3. Search Strategy

The following search terms were used: ‘Rett syndrome’, ‘physical therapy’, ‘physiotherapy’, ‘rehabilitation’.

2.4. Study Selection

Eligibility assessment of the selected studies was performed independently by two reviewers in an unblinded and standardised manner. All titles and abstracts were screened and ineligible articles were excluded. Then, the full text of the studies meeting the inclusion criteria were reviewed in detail by investigators.

2.5. Data Collection Process

Data from original articles were recorded on a data extraction form. The following data were extracted by one investigator and then crosschecked by the other: general information concerning the study (lead author and year of publication), study design, physical therapy approach, number of participants, assessment tool, follow-up duration, main results/findings, and level of evidence (grade of recommendation). Disagreements between the two reviewers on extraction of data were resolved by discussion; if no agreement could be reached, a third reviewer would be invited to make a decision.

2.6. Level of Evidence Assessment Process

Level of evidence was assessed independently by two of the investigators using the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM)—Levels of Evidence guide [35]. Publication bias was not assessed because of the small number of selected studies.

3. Results

A total of 17,319 potentially relevant records emerged from the keywords searching in PubMed (n = 319), Cochrane Library (n = 0), PeDro (n = 0), and Google Scholar (n = 17000) databases. 16400 records were immediately removed as they were letters, comments, editorials, conference proceedings, and practice guidelines. Following this, a screening of the title and abstract of the 919 remaining studies was made, resulting in the elimination of types of publications different from what was stated in the inclusion criteria. Duplicates were also excluded. This second screening allowed an additional 869 results to be eliminated. Therefore, the full-text version of a total of 50 articles was assessed; 28 articles did not meet the inclusion criteria and were excluded. Eventually, a total of 22 studies were considered eligible. The selected results were classified as follows: 14 case reports, 2 case series, 2 multiple baseline studies, 1 single-case A-B-A-B design study, 1 single-case AB design study, 1 case-control study, and 1 modified individually randomized stepped wedge trial. From the detailed analysis of selected articles, nine approaches to physical therapy in patients with RTT were identified: (1) applied behavior analysis, (2) conductive education, (3) environmental enrichment, (4) traditional physical therapy with or without aids, (5) hydrotherapy, (6) treadmill, (7) music therapy, (8) computerized systems and (9) sensory-based treatment (Snoezelen).
The PRISMA flow diagram used for study selection process is summarised in Figure 1. The details of studies selected for the systematic review are listed in Table 1.

3.1. Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA)

ABA was analyzed in two of the selected papers. In their 2007 review about alternative interventions for people affected by RTT, Lotan and colleagues stated that the use of ABA was extremely positive with reference to the acquisition of skills and the enhancement of the patient involvement in daily situations [43].
The 2015 study by Lotan et al. described a case report where ABA techniques succeeded in extending the patient daily walking ability [51].

3.2. Conductive Education (CE)

The 2012 single-case A-B design study by Lotan et al. assessed the functional skills of three girls with RTT aged 3–5 years before and during participation in a CE program [46]. Results showed that gross motor function skills improved at the end of the intervention period, but slightly declined in the following months of inactivity.

3.3. Environmental Enrichment (EE)

The 2018 modified individually randomized stepped wedge trial by Downs and colleagues investigated the effects of EE on gross motor skills and Blood Brain Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) levels in a group of 12 girls with RTT [56]. EE was able to reduce functional deficit and to boost brain function after 6 months of treatment. Growth, sleep quality and mood were unaffected.

3.4. Traditional Physical Therapy with or without Aids

Four of the selected papers belong to this group. In their 2001 case report, Larsson et al. stressed the importance of keeping the feet of RTT patients in good position making it possible to stand and walk. The combination of surgery, physiotherapy and well-fitting orthoses was used to manage feet malpositions [36]. The results showed that such combined approach allowed (1) to prevent muscle contracture and joint stiffness, (2) to regain ability to make transfers independently, and (3) to walk again even after a period of immobility.
The 2005 case report by Lotan et al. described a new management approach to scoliosis in a girl with RTT [41]. The patient underwent intensive therapeutic exercise, carried out with adapted equipment (cushion, seat, chair, and standing frame), and hydrotherapy. The results seemed to indicate that this intervention might be effective in treating scoliosis in RTT patients.
In their 2012 case report, Lotan and colleagues described a patient affected by RTT who regained her walking ability at the age of 28 years thanks to a three years of intensive activity programme, after being in a wheelchair for about five years [47]. The intervention programme included (1) a daily section implemented by the caregivers, consisting of lying position and walking exercises, and (2) a section performed by the physical therapist twice weekly, including joint mobility, balance training, walking exercises, and stair climbing and descending.
The 2015 case report by Schaefer-Campion et al. suggested that physical therapist and health professionals are essential in the process of selecting the assistive device for children with RTT to promote ambulation [52].

3.5. Hydrotherapy

In their 2003 case report, Bumin et al. investigated the effect of hydrotherapy, practiced in accordance to the Halliwick method for 8 weeks on an 11-year-old girl with RTT [38]. Immediately after hydrotherapy, stereotypical movements decreased, feeding activities and hand skills increased, walking balance was improved, interaction with environment intensified and hyperactive behavior and anxiety diminished.
In the 2009 study by Lotan et al., the importance of water as a mediating environment for managing people with RTT was explained [45]. The authors introduced a case study of effective intervention strategies for a young child. Hydrotherapy improved communication and motor skills, enhancing the patient’s control over daily situations.

3.6. Treadmill

The 2004 study by Lotan et al. showed that a daily training program on a treadmill lasting two months was capable of improving functional ability in four girls with RTT [39]. Furthermore, the authors stated that non-professional personnel could execute such a program under supervision of a qualified physical therapist. This was a non-controlled observational clinical trial.
The 2018 case-control study by Larsson et al. investigated the autonomic responses during walking on a treadmill in 12 females with RTT and in 14 healthy females [57]. The results showed that individuals with RTT could walk continuously for up to six minutes at their own maximum sustainable speed on a treadmill. The autonomic reactions in RTT patients differed only in the time course but not in amplitude compared with that in the control group.

3.7. Music Therapy

In the 2001 case report by Yasuhara et al., thirty-minute private sessions of active music therapy were used to treat three children with RTT. At the end of the treatment, patients showed (1) some degree of mental and physical development, (2) improvement of purposive hand use, and (3) development of language comprehension [37].
In their 2004 case report, Elefant and colleagues showed that a dual music and physical intervention approach allowed to shorten treatment time and to reach therapy possibilities that were unavailable with single therapeutic arrangement [40]. Patient’s communication choice-making abilities advanced dramatically, with positive effects on independence, self-esteem, self-confidence, and quality of life.
The 2013 case report by Hackett et al. showed that six months of music therapy provided opportunities for a four-year-old child with RRT to increase skills related to functional hand use and social interaction [48].

3.8. Computerized Systems

The 2008 case report by Pizzamiglio et al. stated that an experimental, computerized visual-motor coordination training in association with a sensory-motor rehabilitative program based on Piaget’s theory, lasting 3 years, provided a patient with RTT with a partial recovery of voluntary and purposeful use of the hands. Such a program promoted the development of action and interaction schemes with the external world and enhanced behaviors suitable to the environment stimulations [44].
The 2013 multiple baseline design study by Stasolla et al. showed that a microswitch-based program lasting 6 months increased performance and indices of happiness and decreased stereotyped behaviors for two girls with RTT and multiple disabilities [49].
In their 2014 study, Lancioni et al. stated that microswitch-aided programs for adults with RTT (1) increased level of responding and stimulation input, (2) represented a very advantageous opportunity thanks to the use of activation responses, that could be performed through different movements, and (3) increased indices of happiness [50].
The 2015 study by Stasolla et al. showed that the use of assistive technologies was able to increase the adaptive responses and to decrease the stereotyped behaviors in three girls with RTT [53]. Moreover, during intervention patients improved their mood with positive consequences on the quality of life. In conclusion, the authors stated that assistive technologies based programs could be useful to increase occupation opportunities in people with RTT.
In their 2016 case series, Mraz and colleagues analyzed the feasibility of using an internet-based virtual reality intervention (FAAST software and Microsoft Kinetect sensor) for six girls with RTT [54]. The results showed decrease of hand stereotypes and increase of hand and arm movements away from the midline during intervention. Interviews and observation revealed successful game play when games were motivating, clearly established cause and effect, and matched level of cognitive ability of the participant. Furthermore, the authors stated that internet-based virtual reality intervention should be highly individualized to increase motivation and success of intervention.
The 2017 study by McAmis et al. showed that the virtual reality system named VR_Color, specifically tailored for people with RTT, was able to decrease the characteristic repetitive hand movements and to increase the use of hands in skilled functions [55]. Moreover, this intervention proved to be successful in severe RTT cases, differently from the FAAST system, which has not been tested in the treatment of such patients [54].

3.9. Sensory-Based Treatment (Snoezelen)

The 2006 article by Lotan reviewed the available scientific materials on the topic of Snoezelen, also known as controlled multisensory environment, incorporating clinical knowledge in the field of RTT and suggesting this approach as an appropriate intervention method for this population [42]. Three case reports have been analyzed; Snoezelen was able to relax the patient, to reduce muscle tone, to improve articular range of motion, and to enhance gait and balance. No posture improvement was reported.

4. Discussion

RTT is a rare, neurodevelopmental disorder that primarily affects females resulting in severe cognitive and physical disabilities. Treatment of RTT is purely supportive as there are no specific therapies currently available. RTT is associated with a high prevalence of comorbidities, the management of which requires a multidisciplinary approach. With multidisciplinary health care, people with RTT can enjoy a better quality of life and a considerably longer lifespan. In order to achieve such positive results, the RTT multidisciplinary team should always refer to guidelines that provide a practical and ethical framework for decision-making. At present, the only available guidelines concerning physical therapy in RTT are the 2006 guidelines for individual intervention by Lotan, the 2009 guidelines for management of scoliosis by Downs et al., and the 2016 guidelines for management of bone health by Jefferson et al. [14,19,58]. One of the essential requirements of a trustworthy guideline is that it should be based on systematic reviews of the best available evidence, and should include assessment of the quality of evidence, whereas all the above-mentioned guidelines for physical therapy in people with RTT were based only on expert opinions. This led to the need for carrying out this systematic review of the literature.
This systematic review showed that available evidence for physiotherapy in RTT is low. The level of evidence of included studies ranged from 2b to 4 on the OCEBM scale. One study was a modified individually randomized stepped wedge trial with level of evidence 2b. One study was a case-control study with level of evidence 3b. The remaining studies were case reports and case series with level of evidence 4. Hence, in agreement with the OCEBM grades of recommendation, one of the selected studies was categorized as grade B and all the remaining studies as grade C (Table 1).
Regardless of the type of intervention practiced, all studies included in this review demonstrated that physical therapy improved the quality of life in patients diagnosed with RTT, mainly helping to preserve autonomy. On the other side, caution should be adopted in the interpretation of our findings since studies were highly heterogeneous in terms of participants, diagnostic criteria, interventions and outcomes. In particular, we would recommend the use of shared criteria in the diagnosis of RTT in order to make studies comparable [59].
A series of physical therapies are currently available to reduce or prevent limitations in people with RTT and to improve their quality of life. Such physiotherapies range from traditional approaches, like joint mobilization and hydrotherapy, to innovative methods, e.g. virtual reality and assistive technologies, and to almost alternative interventions, such as music therapy. Scientific literature showed that patients had clinically benefited from those different approaches despite the lack of strong research evidence. Several significant statements arose from this review: (1) early developmental intervention is imperative in order to assure that people with RTT reach their full potential, which is different for each patient; (2) physical therapy programs need to be individualized, both regarding types of intervention and program development, so that each patient may receive the most appropriate treatment for the stage of the disease and its personal needs, (3) currently no single reviewed physical therapy can be recommended over another for the lack of cross-comparative studies, but there is some level of evidence for each individual therapy with regards to its specifically measured outcomes, (4) multifaceted interventions lead to good results, and (5) a suitable intervention program must include appropriate involvement of the patient’s family or caregivers.
This is the first systematic review concerning physiotherapy in RTT. The present review was carried out following PRISMA reporting guidelines, with a clear, detailed and reproducible methodology.
This review has several limitations: (1) the small number of studies selected for the final phase, (2) the fair methodological quality of selected papers (e.g. small sample size, heterogeneity of interventions and assessment tools, short follow-up duration), (3) the impossibility of carrying out a meta-analysis, and (4) the lack of publication bias assessment. However, as stated in 2017 by Rath and colleagues, “clinical research in rare diseases needs to face several barriers that comprise the difficulty to recruit participants because of rarity, scattering of the patients, limited knowledge on natural history of diseases, difficulties to achieve accurate diagnosis and identify patients in health information systems, and difficulties choosing clinically relevant outcomes” [60].
Evidence-based physical therapy has been defined by Herbert as “physiotherapy informed by integration of relevant high-quality clinical research, patients’ preferences and physiotherapists’ practice knowledge” [61]. Nevertheless, in the event that high-quality clinical research is not available, like for RTT, Herbert stated that “good practice must make use of sources of any other lower quality research to inform action in practice” [61]. Therefore, we are confident that the findings of this systematic review will provide the best available practice management to clinicians and other health care professionals that work with RTT individuals every day.

5. Conclusions

A physical therapy program should be regularly recommended to patients with RTT, in order to preserve and restore movement and physical function threatened by the disease. This approach should be always individualized and adjusted to the needs of the patients. Preserving autonomy, improving quality of life, and supporting family caregivers should be the main objectives of such an approach.
Since the level of evidence for the scientific literature concerning the topic is currently low, future research should focus on carrying out studies with a better methodology and higher level of evidence. Given the difficulty in conducting traditional Randomized Controlled Trials (RTCs) on this topic, a valid alternative could be to perform Stepped Wedge Trials (SWTs), which involve a sequential roll-out of an intervention to participants over a number of time periods, such as in the 2018 study by Downs et al. [26].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.F., F.S. and B.C.; methodology, M.F. and B.C.; investigation, M.F.; data curation, M.F. and B.C.; writing—original draft preparation, M.F. and B.C.; writing—review and editing, F.S. and B.C.; visualization, M.F. and B.C.; supervision, F.S. and B.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gold, W.A.; Krishnarajy, R.; Ellaway, C.; Christodoulou, J. Rett Syndrome: A Genetic Update and Clinical Review Focusing on Comorbidities. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2018, 9, 167–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Percy, A.K. Rett Syndrome: Seeing the Way Forward. In Health Care for People with Intellectual and Developmental. Disabilities Across the Lifespan, 3rd ed.; Rubin, I.L., Merrick, J., Greydanus, D.E., Patel, D.R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016; pp. 765–777. ISBN 978-3-319-18096-0. [Google Scholar]
  3. Vidal, S.; Xiol, C.; Pascual-Alonso, A.; O’Callaghan, M.; Pineda, M.; Armstrong, J. Genetic Landscape of Rett Syndrome Spectrum: Improvements and Challenges. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  4. Feldman, D.; Banerjee, A.; Sur, M. Developmental Dynamics of Rett Syndrome. Neural Plast. 2016, 2016, 6154080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Liyanage, V.R.; Rastegar, M. Rett syndrome and MeCP2. Neuromol. Med. 2014, 16, 231–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Shah, R.R.; Bird, A.P. MeCP2 mutations: Progress towards understanding and treating Rett syndrome. Genome Med. 2017, 9, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Hanefeld, F. The clinical pattern of the Rett syndrome. Brain Dev. 1985, 7, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Leven, Y.; Wiegand, F.; Wilken, B. Sleep Quality in Children and Adults with Rett Syndrome. Neuropediatrics 2020, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bianco, E.; Rota, D. Oral findings in Rett syndrome: An update and review of the literature. Dent. Med. Probl. 2018, 55, 441–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Henriksen, M.W.; Breck, H.; Von Tetzchner, S.; Paus, B.; Skjeldal, O.H.; Brodtkorb, E. Epilepsy in classic Rett syndrome: Course and characteristics in adult age. Epilepsy Res. 2018, 145, 134–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Tarquinio, D.C.; Hou, W.; Neul, J.L.; Berkmen, G.K.; Drummond, J.; Aronoff, E.; Harris, J.; Lane, J.B.; Kaufmann, W.E.; Motil, K.J.; et al. The course of awake breathing disturbances across the lifespan in Rett syndrome. Brain Dev. 2018, 40, 515–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. National Organization for Rare Disorders. Available online: https://rarediseases.org/rare-diseases/rett-syndrome/ (accessed on 30 December 2019).
  13. Killian, J.T.; Lane, J.B.; Lee, H.S.; Skinner, S.A.; Kaufmann, W.E.; Glaze, D.G.; Neul, J.L.; Percy, A.K. Scoliosis in Rett Syndrome: Progression, Comorbidities, and Predictors. Pediatr. Neurol. 2017, 70, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Jefferson, A.; Leonard, H.; Siafarikas, A.; Woodhead, H.; Fyfe, S.; Ward, L.M.; Munns, C.; Motil, K.; Tarquinio, D.; Shapiro, J.R.; et al. Clinical Guidelines for Management of Bone Health in Rett Syndrome Based on Expert Consensus and Available Evidence. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0146824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Townend, G.S.; Van De Berg, R.; De Breet, L.; Hiemstra, M.; Wagter, L.; Smeets, E.; Widdershoven, J.; Kingma, H.; Curfs, L. Oculomotor Function in Individuals with Rett Syndrome. Pediatr. Neurol. 2018, 88, 48–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Lotan, M.; Zysman, L. The digestive system and nutritional considerations for individuals with Rett syndrome. Sci. World J. 2006, 6, 1737–1749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kirby, R.S.; Lane, J.B.; Childers, J.; Skinner, S.A.; Annese, F.; Barrish, J.O.; Glaze, D.G.; Macleod, P.; Percy, A.K. Longevity in Rett syndrome: Analysis of the North American Database. J. Pediatr. 2010, 156, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Ellaway, C.; Christodoulou, J. Rett syndrome: Clinical characteristics and recent genetic advances. Disabil. Rehabil. 2001, 23, 98–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Lotan, M. Rett Syndrome. Guidelines for Individual Intervention. Sci. World J. 2006, 6, 1504–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cup, E.H.; Pieterse, A.J.; Ten Broek-Pastoor, J.M.; Munneke, M.; Van Engelen, B.G.; Hendricks, H.T.; Van Der Wilt, G.J.; Oostendorp, R.A. Exercise therapy and other types of physical therapy for patients with neuromuscular diseases: A systematic review. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2007, 88, 1452–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Johnson, L.B.; Florence, J.M.; Abresch, R.T. Physical therapy evaluation and management in neuromuscular diseases. Phys. Med. Rehabil. Clin. N. Am. 2012, 23, 633–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Corrado, B.; Ciardi, G. Facioscapulohumeral distrophy and physiotherapy: A literary review. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 2015, 27, 2381–2385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Corrado, B.; Ciardi, G.; Bargigli, C. Rehabilitation Management of the Charcot-Marie-Tooth Syndrome: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Medicine 2016, 95, e3278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Corrado, B.; Ciardi, G.; Iammarrone, C.S. Rehabilitation management of Pompe disease, from childhood trough adulthood: A systematic review of the literature. Neurol. Int. 2019, 11, 7983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ryan, J.M.; Cassidy, E.E.; Noorduyn, S.G.; O’Connell, N.E. Exercise interventions for cerebral palsy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2017, 6, CD011660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Quinn, L.; Busse, M.; Carrier, J.; Fritz, N.; Harden, J.; Hartel, L.; Kegelmeyer, D.; Kloos, A.; Rao, A. Physical therapy and exercise interventions in Huntington’s disease: A mixed methods systematic review protocol. JBI Database Syst. Rev. Implement. Rep. 2017, 15, 1783–1799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Corrado, B.; Sommella, N.; Ciardi, G.; Raiano, E.; Scala, I.; Strisciuglio, P.; Servodio Iammarrone, C. Can early physical therapy positively affect the onset of independent walking in infants with Down syndrome? A retrospective cohort study. Minerva Pediatr. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Corrado, B.; Ciardi, G.; Fortunato, L.; Servodio Iammarrone, C. Burnout syndrome among Italian physiotherapists: A cross-sectional study. Eur. J. Physiother. 2019, 21, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Silva, I.S.; Pedrosa, R.; Azevedo, I.G.; Forbes, A.M.; Fregonezi, G.A.; Dourado, M.E., Jr.; Lima, S.R.; Ferreira, G.M. Respiratory muscle training in children and adults with neuromuscular disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019, 9, CD011711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bartels, B.; Montes, J.; Van Der Pol, W.L.; De Groot, J.F. Physical exercise training for type 3 spinal muscular atrophy. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019, 3, CD012120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Vola, E.A.; Albano, M.; Di Luise, C.; Servodidio, V.; Sansone, M.; Russo, S.; Corrado, B.; Servodio Iammarrone, C.; Caprio, M.G.; Vallone, G. Use of ultrasound shear wave to measure muscle stiffness in children with cerebral palsy. J. Ultrasound 2018, 21, 241–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Corrado, B.; Di Luise, C.; Servodio Iammarrone, C. Management of Muscle Spasticity in Children with Cerebral Palsy by Means of Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Dev. Neurorehabil. 2019, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Santos, C.M.D.C.; Pimenta, C.A.D.M.; Nobre, M.R.C. The PICO strategy for the research question construction and evidence search. Rev. Lat. Am. Enferm. 2007, 15, 508–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Moher, D.; Shamseer, L.; Clarke, M.; Ghersi, D.; Liberati, A.; Petticrew, M.; Shekelle, P.; Stewart, L.A.; PRISMA-P Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst. Rev. 2015, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. OCEBM Levels of Evidence Working Group. OCEBM Levels of Evidence. Available online: http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653 (accessed on 30 December 2019).
  36. Larsson, G.; Engerström, I.W. Gross motor ability in Rett syndrome-the power of expectation, motivation and planning. Brain Dev. 2001, 23, S77–S81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Yasuhara, A.; Sugiyama, Y. Music therapy for children with Rett syndrome. Brain Dev. 2001, 23, S82–S84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Bumin, G.; Uyanik, M.; Yilmaz, I.; Kayihan, H.; Topçu, M. Hydrotherapy for Rett Syndrome. J. Rehabil. Med. 2003, 35, 44–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Lotan, M.; Isakov, E.; Merrick, J. Improving functional skills and physical fitness in children with Rett syndrome. J. Intellect. Disabil. 2004, 48, 730–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Elefant, C.; Lotan, M. Rett Syndrome: Dual Intervention—Music and Physical Therapy. Nord J. Music Ther. 2004, 13, 172–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Lotan, M.; Merrick, J.; Carmeli, E. Managing Scoliosis in a Young Child with Rett Syndrome: A Case Study. Sci. World J. 2005, 5, 264–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lotan, M. Management of Rett Syndrome in the Controlled Multisensory (snoezelen) Environment. A Review with Three Case Stories. Sci. World J. 2006, 6, 791–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Lotan, M. Alternative Therapeutic Intervention for Individuals with Rett Syndrome. Sci. World J. 2007, 7, 698–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Pizzamiglio, M.R.; Nasti, M.; Piccardi, L.; Zotti, A.; Vitturini, C.; Spitoni, G.; Nanni, M.V.; Guariglia, C.; Morelli, D. Sensory-Motor Rehabilitation in Rett Syndrome: A Case Report. Focus Autism Other Dev. Disabl. 2008, 23, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lotan, M.; Barmatz, C. Hydrotherapy for a young child with Rett syndrome. Review of the literature and a case study. Int. J. Disabil. Hum. Dev. 2009, 8, 349–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Lotan, M.; Schenker, R.; Wine, J.; Downs, J. The conductive environment enhances gross motor function of girls with Rett syndrome. A pilot study. Dev. Neurorehabil. 2012, 15, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lotan, M.; Gootman, A. Regaining walking ability in individuals with Rett syndrome: A case study. Int. J. Disabil. Hum. Dev. 2012, 11, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Hackett, S.; Morison, C.; Pullen, C. A retrospective practice based evaluation of music therapy: A Single-case study of a four-year-old girl with Rett syndrome- Rebecca’s story. Arts Psychother. 2013, 40, 473477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Stasolla, F.; Caffò, A.O. Promoting adaptative behaviors by two girls with Rett syndrome through a microswitch-based program. Res. Autism Spectr. Disord. 2013, 7, 1256–1272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Lancioni, G.E.; Singh, N.N.; O’Reilly, M.F.; Sigafoos, J.; Boccasini, A.; La Martire, M.L.; Buonocunto, F.; Biancardi, E.M.; Sacco, V. Microswitch-aided Programs for a Woman with Rett Syndrome and a Boy with Extensive Neuro-motor and Intellectual Disabilities. J. Dev. Phys. Disabil. 2014, 26, 135–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lotan, M.; Shavit, E.; Merrick, J. Enhancing Walking Ability in Individuals with Rett Syndrome Through the Use of Applied Behavioral Analysis (ABA): Review and a Case Study. Open Rehabil. J. 2015, 8, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Scheafer-Champion, C.; Johnson, N.L. Fostering Ambulation for a Preschool Child with Rett Syndrome: A Case Report. Phys. Occup. Ther. Pediatr. 2015, 35, 354–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Stasolla, F.; Perilli, V.; Di Leone, A.; Damiani, R.; Albano, V.; Stella, A.; Damato, C. Technological Aids to Support Choice Strategies by Three Girls with Rett Syndrome. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2015, 36, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mraz, K.M.; Amadio, G.; Diener, P.; Eisenberg, G.; Engsberg, J.R. Improving Upper Extremity Motor Skills in Girls with Rett Syndrome Using Virtual Reality. Intellect. Disabil. Diagn. J. 2016, 4, 142–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. McAmis, N.E.; Foreman, M.H.; Himmelrich, M.D.; Diener, P.S.; Engsberg, J.R. Development of a Method to Use a Color Tracker for Motor Therapy for Individuals with Rett Syndrome. SM J. Pediatr. 2017, 2, 1012. [Google Scholar]
  56. Downs, J.; Rodger, J.; Li, C.; Tan, X.; Hu, N.; Wong, K.; De Klerk, N.; Leonard, H. Environmental enrichment intervention for Rett syndrome: An individually randomised stepped wedge trial. Orphanet J. Rare Dis. 2018, 13, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Larsson, G.; Julu, P.O.O.; Engerström, I.W.; Sandlund, M.; Lindström, B. Walking on treadmill with Rett syndrome—Effects on the autonomic nervous system. Res. Dev. Disabil. 2018, 83, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Downs, J.; Bergman, A.; Carter, P.; Anderson, A.; Palmer, G.M.; Roye, D.; Van Bosse, H.; Bebbington, A.; Larsson, E.L.; Smith, B.G.; et al. Guidelines for Management of Scoliosis in Rett Syndrome Patients Based on Expert Consesus and Clinical Evidence. Spine 2009, 34, E607–E617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Neul, J.L.; Kaufmann, W.E.; Glaze, D.G.; Christodoulou, J.; Clarke, A.J.; Bahi-Buisson, N.; Leonard, H.; Bailey, M.E.S.; Schanen, N.C.; Zappella, M.; et al. Rett Syndrome: Revised Diagnostic Criteria and Nomenclature. Ann. Neurol. 2010, 68, 944–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Rath, A.; Salamon, V.; Peixoto, S.; Hivert, V.; Laville, M.; Segrestin, B.; Neugebauer, E.; Eikermann, M.; Bertele, V.; Garattini, S.; et al. A systematic literature review of evidence-based clinical practice for rare diseases: What are the perceived and real barriers for improving the evidence and how can they be overcome? Trials 2017, 18, 556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Herbert, R.; Jamtvedt, G.; Birger Hagen, K.; Mead, J. Practical Evidence-Based Physiotherapy, 2nd ed.; Churchill Livingstone Elsevier: London, UK, 2011; ISBN 978-0-7020-4713-8. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) flow chart concerning study retrieval and selection.
Figure 1. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) flow chart concerning study retrieval and selection.
Brainsci 10 00410 g001
Table 1. Summary of the studies included in the review.
Table 1. Summary of the studies included in the review.
Lead Author and Year of PublicationStudy DesignPhysical Therapy ApproachNumber of ParticipantsAssessment ToolFollow-up DurationMain Results/FindingsLevel of Evidence
(Grade of Recom-
Mendation)
Larsson G.
2001 [36]
Case reportKinesiotherapy + orthoses + aids
(following surgery)
3Narrative summaryDifferent for each case
Regaining considerable walking was possible for a 36-year-old woman after 15 years in a wheelchair
Regaining transitional ability from floor to chair was possible when the clues to memory and motivation were found
Development of contractures of feet could be prevented in a 9-year-old
The ability to get up from the floor could be preserved in a 10-year-old girl
4
(C)
Yasuhara A.
2001 [37]
Case reportMusic therapy
(individual session of 30 min/week)
3
A written description and videotape
The Denver developmental screening test (the Denver II)
The developmental psychology of music
40 weeks for two patients and 20 weeks for the third patientThe children showed some degree of mental and physical development: improvement of the purposive hand use, development of language comprehension, development of the ability to communicate by using cards or gestures, development in listening and playing instruments4
(C)
Bumin G.
2003 [38]
Case reportHydrotherapy (Halliwick method)1The tests included:
Analysis of stereotypical movements from a 5-minute video camera recording
Functional hand use according to performance in eating crackers placed on the table
Hand skills (grasping, holding, transferring small and large objects, finger feeding and drinking abilities)
Gait and balance
Hyperactive behaviour
Communication and social interaction
8 weeks
Hand-to-mouth and hand-squeezing movements disappeared, while hand wringing movements appeared
The amount of stereotypical movements decreased
Feeding skills and hand skills in transferring objects and holding them improved
Walking balance improved
Interaction with the environment increased
Hyperactive behaviour and anxiety decreased
4
(C)
Lotan M.
2004 [39]
Case seriesA daily training program on a treadmill4
Pulse measurement was used to evaluate aerobic physical condition at rest, the lowest pulse during 5 min of seating, and during training, the highest measurement during 5 min of walking at 1.5 km/h, with 0 inclination
Functional measurement was based on a 31-item scale specially established for the present study
2 months
The average heart rates at rest were found to be 111.0, 109.0 and 89.0 at times 1, 2 and 3, while the average hearth rates during activity were found to be 145.3, 145.0 and 121.5 at time 1, 2 and 3.
Four items were found to have a significant change between measurement taken before and after intervention, namely knee walking, going up and down stairs, and walking speed for a distance of 25 m.
4
(C)
Elefant C.
2004 [40]
Case reportDual intervention: physical and music therapy1Narrative summaryN.S.
Treatment time was shortened
The difficulty treatment levels were raised
The joint treatment demands were more complex
Communication choice-making abilities advanced
4
(C)
Lotan M.
2005 [41]
Case reportA management plan consisting of: opposing asymmetry postures, walking and/or standing, maintaining spinal mobility through passive manual manipulation, individualized aids, parental and staff guidance1Measurement of the Cobb angle by X-ray in supine and suspended position1 year and 6 months
The Cobb angle in supine position switched from 29° to 20°
The Cobb angle in suspended position switched from 22° to 20°
4
(C)
Lotan M.
2006 [42]
Case reportSnoezelen (Controlled Multisensory Environment)3
(case 1 stage II; case 2 stage III; case 3 stage IV)
Narrative summary
Case 1: 3 months
case 2: 6 months
case 3: 4 months
Case 1: Agitation diminished and the patient was much more relaxed throughout the day
Case 2: falls have completely ceased although posture did not seem to visually change
Case 3: JROM increased throughout the body, enough to ease patient’s daily suffering and alleviate caregivers’ difficulties
4
(C)
Lotan M.
2007 [43]
Case reportDifferent alternative therapeutic interventions: Animal-Assisted Therapy (AAT), Auditory Integration Training (AIT), hyperbaric chamber, acupuncture/acupressure, aromatherapy, craniosacral therapy, Mayo fascial release, chiropractor, Reiki, Treager massage, cognitive rehabilitation, Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), Advanced Biomechanical Rehabilitation (ABR), Doman-Delacato approach, Yoga1Narrative summary3 yearsThe patient definitely made meaningful and significant progress for herself4
(C)
Pizzamiglio M.R.
2008 [44]
Case reportAcclimating to the therapeutic setting + computerized visual-motor coordination training + sensory-motor rehabilitative program1
Bayley Scales of Infant Development (BSID-II)
Mental scale of the BSID-II
Uzgiris-Hunt Ordinal Scales of Psychological Development
MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory
Behavior Rating Scale (BRS) of the BSID-II
3 years
BSID-II: the motor age switched from 11 months to 14 months
Mental scale of the BSID-II: the mental age switched from 4 months to 5 months.
Uzgiris–Hunt Ordinal Scales of Psychological Development: the total score switched from 3 to 32
MacArthur Questionnaire (Sentences and Words): the total score switched from 2 to 56
MacArthur Questionnaire (Gesturs): the total score switched from 1 to 11
Behavior Rating Scale (BRS) of the BSID-II: the score switched from 67 to 145
4
(C)
Lotan M.
2009 [45]
Case reportHydrotherapy1Narrative summary3 yearsThe patient gained control over the body, thereby improving his functional abilities. Such gains, accompanied by improved communication skills, enhanced the child’s control over his daily situations, thereby achieving a feeling of self-worth and empowerment.4
(C)
Lotan M.
2012 [46]
Single-case
A-B design
Conductive Environment (CE)3
Rett Functional Evaluation Scale
Rett Syndrome Gross Motor Scale
Pediatric Evaluation of Disability Inventory (PEDI)
Hand Apraxia Scale.
2 years
Rett Functional Evaluation Scale and Rett Syndrome Gross Motor Scale: improvement for all the patients.
PEDI: no changes.
Hand Apraxia Scale: hand function appeared poorer at the end of the intervention period, although this was not a clear trend because of the fluctuating assessment findings.
4
(C)
Lotan M.
2012 [47]
Case reportThe intervention program includes two sections:
1.
A daily section implemented by the staff which includes lying on the stomach and walking exercises.
2.
A section performed by the physical therapist twice weekly which includes maintaining and enhancing the range of motion of the trunk and limbs, balance training, walking exercises, and stair climbing and descending.
1Functional Independence Measure (FIM)3 yearsThe FIM score switched from 18 to 25.4
(C)
Hackett S.
2013 [48]
Case reportMusic therapy1Retrospective video analysis6 monthsHand movements have become more purposeful. Motor skills (specifically holding) enhanced. Intentional communication improved through promoting turn-tasking.4
(C)
Stasolla F.
2013 [49]
Multiple BaselineMicroswitch-based program2
Microswitches activations independent of prompting
Means of percentage of intervals with indices of happiness
Means of percentage of intervals with stereotyped behavior
About 6 months
Increased performance
increased indices of happiness
decreased stereotyped behaviors
4
(C)
Lancioni G.E.
2014 [50]
Single-case A-B-A-BMicroswitch-aided program
(2 interventions)
1 with RTT and 1 with congenital encephalopathy
Mean frequencies of microswitch responses per session
Mean percentages of observation intervals with indices of happiness
N.S.Increase in microswitch responses and level of happiness for both participants during the intervention phases4
(C)
Lotan M.
2015 [51]
Case reportApplied Behavioral Analysis (ABA)1Number of steps taken daily (accelerometer)3 monthsFrom 800 to 8000 steps/day4
(C)
Schaefer-
Campion C.
2015 [52]
Case reportA series of assistive device trials:
A metal toy shopping card
An anterior/posterior gait trainer with chest support
A posterior gait trainer with upper body supports and rotational handles
An anterior/posterior gait trainer with a seat, hip and chest supports
An anterior front-wheeled walker with lateral stationary handles
An anterior four-wheeled walker with a horizontal bar and lateral handholds
1Gait analysis including:
Initiation of walking
The distance walked
Qualitative component
6 monthsThe anterior four-wheeled walker with a horizontal bar and lateral handholds was chosen4
(C)
Stasolla F.
2015 [53]
Multiple baselineTechnological aids3
(a)
The number of objects inserted in the containers
(b)
The percentage of intervals with stereotypic behaviors
(c)
The percentage of intervals with indices of happiness
About 6 months (225 sessions)
(a)
enhancement of the strategies of choice
(b)
reduction of stereotypic behaviors
(c)
beneficial effects on indices of happiness
4
(C)
Mraz K.M.
2016 [54]
Case seriesVirtual Reality Intervention for Rett Syndrome (RTT-IVR)6Narrative summary + interviewsN.S.Interviews and observation revealed successful game play when games were motivating, clearly established cause and effect, and matched level of cognitive ability of the participant4
(C)
McAmis N.H.
2017 [55]
Case reportVirtual reality1System Usability Scale (SUS)8 monthsThe ultimate feasibility percentile was calculated to be in the seventieth percentile which ranks in the “good” category.4
(C)
Downs J.
2018 [56]
Modified individually randomized stepped wedgeEnvironmental Enrichment (EE)12
Rett Syndrome Gross Motor Scale (RSGMS)
Blood levels of BDNF
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Disorders of Initiating and Maintaining Sleep (DIMS) subscale of the parent-reported Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children
Rett Syndrome Behaviour Questionnaire (RSBQ)
6 months
RSGMS: improvement
Blood levels of BDNF: improvement
BMI, DIMS, RSBQ: similar to baseline values
2b
(B)
Larsson G.
2018 [57]
Case-control studyTo walk on a treadmill at the maximum comfortable walking speed12 RTT girls and 14 healthy females
the NeuroScopeTM
A finger photopletismograph
Video-recordings
Six-minute single testThe changes in cardiac sensitivity to baroreflex and cardiac vagal tone in people with RTT compared to controls indicated more arousal, but only when the treadmill was started; as they continued walking, the arousal dropped to control level. People with RTT exhibited little changes in pCO2 whereas the controls showed increased values during walking.3
(C)
(JROM)—joint range of motion, (RTT)—Rett syndrome, (BDNF)—blood brain derived neurotrophic factor.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fonzo, M.; Sirico, F.; Corrado, B. Evidence-Based Physical Therapy for Individuals with Rett Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10070410

AMA Style

Fonzo M, Sirico F, Corrado B. Evidence-Based Physical Therapy for Individuals with Rett Syndrome: A Systematic Review. Brain Sciences. 2020; 10(7):410. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10070410

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fonzo, Marta, Felice Sirico, and Bruno Corrado. 2020. "Evidence-Based Physical Therapy for Individuals with Rett Syndrome: A Systematic Review" Brain Sciences 10, no. 7: 410. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10070410

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop