Next Article in Journal
A New Treatment Opportunity for DIPG and Diffuse Midline Gliomas: 5-ALA Augmented Irradiation, the 5aai Regimen
Next Article in Special Issue
On the Role of Contrast Polarity: In Response to van der Helm’s Comments
Previous Article in Journal
Polypharmacy Is Associated with Lower Memory Function in African American Older Adults
Previous Article in Special Issue
Insights from a Bibliometric Analysis of Vividness and Its Links with Consciousness and Mental Imagery
Reply published on 17 January 2020, see Brain Sci. 2020, 10(1), 54.
Open AccessComment

Dubious Claims about Simplicity and Likelihood: Comment on Pinna and Conti (2019)

Department of Brain & Cognition, University of Leuven (K.U. Leuven), Tiensestraat 102-Box 3711, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium
Brain Sci. 2020, 10(1), 50; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010050
Received: 17 September 2019 / Revised: 10 January 2020 / Accepted: 13 January 2020 / Published: 16 January 2020
Pinna and Conti (Brain Sci., 2019, 9, 149, doi:10.3390/brainsci9060149) presented phenomena concerning the salience and role of contrast polarity in human visual perception, particularly in amodal completion. These phenomena are indeed illustrative thereof, but here, the focus is on their claims (1) that neither simplicity nor likelihood approaches can account for these phenomena; and (2) that simplicity and likelihood are equivalent. I argue that their first claim is based on incorrect assumptions, whereas their second claim is simply untrue. View Full-Text
Keywords: contrast polarity; perceptual organization; simplicity principle; likelihood principle; simplicity–likelihood equivalence; Bayes; classical information theory; modern information theory contrast polarity; perceptual organization; simplicity principle; likelihood principle; simplicity–likelihood equivalence; Bayes; classical information theory; modern information theory
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

MDPI and ACS Style

van der Helm, P.A. Dubious Claims about Simplicity and Likelihood: Comment on Pinna and Conti (2019). Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010050

AMA Style

van der Helm PA. Dubious Claims about Simplicity and Likelihood: Comment on Pinna and Conti (2019). Brain Sciences. 2020; 10(1):50. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010050

Chicago/Turabian Style

van der Helm, Peter A. 2020. "Dubious Claims about Simplicity and Likelihood: Comment on Pinna and Conti (2019)" Brain Sci. 10, no. 1: 50. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10010050

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop