Next Article in Journal
Theoretical Framework for Characterizing Strain-Dependent Dynamic Soil Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Comprehensive Study of Cross-Section Dependent Effective Masses for Silicon Based Gate-All-Around Transistors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Low-Profile Wideband Monocone Antenna Using Bent Shorting Strips

1
Department of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Hanyang University, Seoul 133-791, Korea
2
Electronic Warfare PMO, Agency for Defense Development, Daejeon 305-600, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(9), 1896; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091896
Submission received: 14 March 2019 / Revised: 24 April 2019 / Accepted: 7 May 2019 / Published: 9 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Electrical, Electronics and Communications Engineering)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

Fuselage mount antenna of an aircraft.

Abstract

A low-profile wideband monocone antenna with bent shorting strips, and parasitic and circular sleeves is proposed. By loading the bent shorting strips, parasitic sleeves, and circular sleeves, miniaturization of the antenna is achieved. Along with bent shorting strips from the monocone hat to the ground plane, parasitic sleeves, and circular sleeves are mounted to enhance the impedance bandwidth. From the experimental results, the –10 dB reflection coefficient bandwidth of the proposed antenna ranges from 810 MHz to 5340 MHz. In addition to the wide bandwidth characteristics, the proposed antenna has highly desirable omnidirectional radiation properties for wireless communication systems.

1. Introduction

Monocone antennas are attractive for industrial, military, and commercial wireless communication systems because they have an omnidirectional radiation pattern with a wide impedance bandwidth. However, these antennas require a large ground plane in wireless transmission applications [1]. To overcome the drawback of a large ground size, methods for miniaturizing monocone antennas have been investigated. However, the reduced ground size causes a reduction of the bandwidth. To increase the bandwidth of monocone antennas, approaches such as resistive loading or the utilization of ferrite materials have been used [2,3,4]. Even though resistive loading of the monocone antenna expands the impedance bandwidth in the low-frequency band, this results in a decrease in the antenna efficiency over the entire band. The use of ferrite in the monocone antenna mounting expands the low-frequency band, but its use is costly and limited to the high-frequency band. The impedance bandwidth of monocone antennas has been improved by various methods, such as adding a shorting-pin [5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12], employing dual-sleeve structures on the ground plane [13,14,15], loading a dielectric substrate in the feed region [16], loading high-permittivity materials around the antenna [17], adding a top-cross plate [18], and cutting slots on the top-loaded patch [19]. However, the profiles of these monocone antennas are peaked relatively sharply, resulting in impedance bandwidths that are not sufficiently wide.
In this paper, a wideband monocone antenna with bent shorting strips, and parasitic and circular sleeves is proposed. The –10 dB reflection coefficient bandwidth ranges from 820 MHz to 5250 MHz. The size reduction of the monocone antenna is achieved by shorting the monocone antenna to the ground plane by four bent shorting strips, with four parasitic and two circular sleeves.

2. Antenna Design

Ideally, an infinite ground plane is required for a monocone antenna to have a monopole-like radiation pattern, but this is usually approximated by a large ground plane in practice. Papas and King presented the input impedance of the monocone antenna using the transmission line theory using the following formula [20]. The monocone antenna in the infinite ground plane is shown in Figure 1. The input impedance of a monocone antenna at the feed point for a given half angle (θ) of a monocone is,
Z i n = Z 0 1 β / α 1 + β / α
where
Z 0 = 60 ln c o s ( θ 0 2 )   [ Ω ] ,
β α = e 2 j k l 1 + j 60 Z 0 n = 1 ( 2 n + 1 ) n ( n + 1 ) [ P n ( c o s θ 0 ) ] 2 ζ n ( k l ) 1 + j 60 Z 0 n = 1 ( 2 n + 1 ) n ( n + 1 ) [ P n ( c o s θ 0 ) ] 2 ζ n ( k l ) ,
and
ζ n ( k l ) = h n 2 ( k l ) h n 1 2 ( k l ) n k l h n 2 ( k l )
β/α is the reflection coefficient between the terminating impedance of the cone and free space. P n 2 ( cos θ 0 ) is nth order Legendre polynomial, h n 2 is the spherical Hankel function of the second kind, and ζ n ( k l ) is helper funcion. The input impedance of a monocone antenna can be calculated according to the ‘kl’ value where ‘l’ is the slant height of a monocone and k (= 2 π λ ) is the wave number. Based on above design equations, the dimensions of a monocone operating at 2.7 GHz are determined by the following: half cone angle ( θ 0 ) = 56˚ and slant height (l) = 45 mm.
The proposed antenna consists of a monocone antenna, four bent shorting strips, four parasitic sleeves, and inner and outer circular sleeves. By attaching the bent shorting strips from the monocone hat to the ground plane, a reduction in size is achieved. The proposed antenna has a parallel resonance mode that generates the resonance in the low-frequency band. The parallel resonance is generated by an anti-resonance formed by a parallel circuit containing the capacitance between the top monocone hat and the ground plane, and the inductance of the bent shorting strips. Moreover, the parasitic sleeves and circular sleeves are loaded to improve the impedance matching characteristic of the monocone antenna. The monocone antenna and the ground plane are made of a copper with a conductivity of 5.8001 × 10 7 S/m. The radius of the monocone antenna is 0.135 λ m i n ( λ m i n is the free-space wavelength at the low frequency) and the antenna height ( H 1 ) is 0.073 λ m i n . The height ( H 1 ) is chosen such that the total antenna structure can be embedded into the fuselage of an aircraft. The design parameters of the proposed antenna are shown in Figure 2 and the antenna dimensions are given in Table 1.

3. Antenna Analysis

The fractional impedance bandwidth for the proposed antenna is about 146.5%, measured over the –10 dB reflection coefficient range of 810–5250 MHz, as shown in Figure 3. To analyze the effects of the bent shorting strips, parasitic sleeves, and circular sleeves, a comparison among the reflection coefficients of reference 1 (only monocone), reference 2 (monocone with bent strips), reference 3 (monocone with bent strips and circular sleeves), and the proposed antenna is conducted, as shown in Figure 3. For reference 1, a –10 dB impedance bandwidth of 1680 MHz (1820–3500 MHz) is obtained. To expand the low frequency limit, the shorting strips are employed such that an additional resonance mode is generated below the fundamental mode [13,21]. We adopted the bent shorting strip instead of a straight shorting strip to improve the impedance matching at around 1.2 GHz, as well as to minimize the antenna height. The simulated –10 dB impedance bandwidth of reference 2 is 2340 MHz (810–3150 MHz).
However, the impedance bandwidth of reference 2 is not enough to cover the requirements of the present wireless communication systems. To improve the impedance matching characteristics at the mid-and upper-frequency bands, we employed the inner and outer circular sleeves on the ground plane [14,15]. Two –10 dB impedance bandwidth regions of 3500 MHz (810–4310 MHz) and 740 MHz (4440–5180 MHz) are obtained as shown in Figure 3. It can be seen that the circular sleeves can improve the impedance matching characteristics in the mid- and upper-frequency bands. However, the –10 dB impedance bandwidth of reference 3 is still not satisfied in the frequency ranges between 4310 and 4440 MHz.
To improve the –10 dB impedance matching characteristics at 4310–4440 MHz and further expand the high frequency limit, parasitic sleeves are mounted on the ground plane [14]. Consequently, the simulated –10 dB impedance bandwidth of the proposed antenna becomes 4440 MHz (810–5250 MHz). This result indicates that the existence of parasitic sleeves effectively improves the impedance matching characteristics in the mid- and upper-frequency bands.
To investigate the operational principle of the antenna, the current distributions of the proposed antenna of reference 1, reference 2, and proposed antenna at 0.91 GHz, 2.63 GHz, 3.41 GHz, 4.07 GHz, 5.03 GHz, and 5.45 GHz are analyzed, as shown in Figure 4. For reference 1, the currents are mainly concentrated at the center of the ground plane and shows that T M 01 resonance mode operates mainly. At 2.63 GHz, strong currents are excited at the center of the ground plane, revealing that the resonance at this frequency is generated by the monocone antenna itself. For reference 2, the currents are strongly excited at the center of the ground plane and along the bent shorting strips from the monocone hat to the ground plane. Particularly, at 0.91 GHz, the current distribution shows that T M 41 resonance mode is the principle operating mode. Therefore, the bent shorting strips primarily affect the antenna performance in the low-frequency regime. For the proposed antenna, the currents flowing through the monocone antenna and shorting strips are coupled to the inner, outer, and parasitic sleeves. Particularly, at 3.41 GHz, 4.07 GHz, and 5.03 GHz, the currents are strongly induced on these additional structures (inner, outer, and parasitic sleeves). This phenomenon can be regarded as the main cause of the input impedance matching improvement in the mid- and upper frequency bands.
Figure 5 shows the simulated reflection coefficients when the radius of the inner circular sleeve ( R 2 ) varies from 38 mm to 40 mm. Figure 6 shows the simulated reflection coefficients when the height of the inner circular sleeve ( H 2 ) varies from 8 mm to 10 mm. It can be seen that the inner sleeve radius and height mainly affect the impedance matching characteristics in the mid- and upper-frequency bands. Figure 7 shows the simulated reflection coefficients when the height of the outer circular sleeve ( H 3 ) varies from 3 mm to 7 mm. It can be seen that the magnitude of the sleeve height mainly affects the impedance matching characteristics in the mid- and upper-frequency bands. Figure 8 depicts the simulated reflection coefficients when the height of the parasitic sleeve ( H 4 ) for the proposed antenna varies from 8 mm to 12 mm. The results show that the impedance matching characteristics are mainly affected in the mid and upper bands and that the high-frequency band is expanded by shifting the resonance point of the upper band to the high-frequency side. The improvement of the impedance matching characteristics of the mid and upper bands by the parasitic and circular sleeves is due to capacitance coupling between the sleeves and the monocone antenna. Figure 9 illustrates the effect of the width of the bent shorting strips ( W 2 ) on the impedance matching as it changes from 0.7 mm to 1.3 mm. It is shown that the width of the bent shorting strips affects the impedance matching characteristics in mid- and upper-frequency bands. By properly choosing the width of the bent shorting strips, the bandwidth of the proposed antenna is enhanced by shifting the resonance point of the upper band to the high-frequency side.

4. Experimental Results

A photograph of the fabricated antenna is shown in Figure 10. Figure 11 shows the simulated and measured reflection coefficients of the proposed antenna. They agree well over the entire frequency band of interest. The measured –10 dB reflection coefficient bandwidth is 4530 MHz (810–5340 MHz) and the fractional bandwidth is about 147.3%.
The simulated and measured radiation patterns of the proposed antenna in the E- and H-planes at 0.91 GHz, 2.48 GHz, 4.07 GHz, and 5.03 GHz are shown in Figure 12 (the xz plane is the E-plane and the xy plane is the H-plane). The measured radiation patterns are in good agreement with the simulated ones. It can be observed that the antenna has dipole-like radiation patterns in the E-plane and omni-directional radiation patterns in the H-plane. Furthermore, the radiation patterns are relatively stable over the entire frequency band. The simulated and measured gains of the proposed antenna are shown in Figure 13. The simulated maximum gain varies from 3.60 dBi to 5.69 dBi, and measured gain varies from 3.24 dBi to 6.2 dBi within the operating frequency band.
Table 2 provides dimensions, the –10 dB reflection coefficient bandwidth, and fractional bandwidth comparison between the broadband antennas using different methods to improve the bandwidth, along with the proposed antenna. It can be observed that the fractional bandwidth of the proposed antenna is much wider than the others, with a height comparable to the other antennas. The antennas in [18,19] have smaller diameters, but their fractional bandwidths are narrower than the proposed antenna. Therefore, the proposed antenna has the advantages of a low profile and wide bandwidth over the other monocone antennas.

5. Conclusions

A low-profile wideband monocone antenna with bent shorting strips, and parasitic and circular sleeves is proposed in this paper. By loading the bent shorting strips, parasitic sleeves, and circular sleeves, miniaturization of the antenna is achieved. By attaching the bent shorting strips from the monocone hat to the ground plane, the proposed antenna has a parallel resonance mode generating the resonance in the low-frequency band. Moreover, the parasitic and circular sleeves improve the impedance matching characteristics of the monocone antenna in the mid-frequency band. From the experimental results, a 147.3% fractional impedance bandwidth for a wide bandwidth –10 dB reflection coefficient is obtained. The proposed antenna provides stable dipole-like radiation patterns for the entire band. Along with the wide impedance bandwidth, the proposed antenna has good radiation properties, which are desirable for wireless transmission and communication systems.

Author Contributions

The presented work was carried out in collaboration between all the authors. K.-S.K. wrote the paper. Y.-M.P. participated in the conception. J.-H.C. supervised the research.

Funding

This work was supported by the research fund of the Signal Intelligence Research Center supervised by the Defense Acquisition Program Administration and the Agency for Defense Development of Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wiesbeck, W.; Adamiuk, G.; Sturm, C. Basic properties and design principles of UWB antennas. Proc. IEEE 2009, 97, 372–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ha, J.; Elmansouri, M.A.; Filipović, D.S. Wideband, loaded, small diameter monocone antenna. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation (APS), Vancouver, BC, Canada, 19–24 July 2015; pp. 2317–2318. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yu, Y.K.; Li, J. Analysis of electrically small size conical antennas. Prog. Electromag. Res. 2008, 1, 85–92. [Google Scholar]
  4. Moon, H.; Lee, G.Y.; Chen, C.C.; Volakis, J.L. An Extremely Low-Profile Ferrite-Loaded Wideband VHF Antenna Design. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. 2012, 11, 322–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aten, D.W.; Haupt, R.L. A wideband, low profile, shorted top hat monocone antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2012, 60, 4485–4491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhou, S.; Ma, J.; Deng, J.; Liu, Q. A low-profile and broadband conical antenna. Prog. Electromag. Res. 2009, 7, 97–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Trong, N.N.; Pinapati, S.P.; Hall, D.; Piotrowski, A.; Fumeaux, C. Ultralow-profile and flush-mounted monopolar antennas integrated into a metallic cavity. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. 2018, 17, 86–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Yu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Chen, Z. A broadband dual-polarized omnidirectional MIMO antenna for 4G LTE applications. Prog. Electromag. Res. 2015, 57, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Chen, X.; Yang, L.; Wang, L.; Fu, G. Super-wideband and compact omnidirectional antenna with simple structure and improved radiation properties. Int. J. Microw. Wirel. Technol. 2017, 9, 711–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, H.; Zhang, F.; Yang, Y. An Electrically Small Low-Profile and Ultra-Wideband Antenna with Monopole-Like Radiation Characteristics. Prog. Electromag. Res. 2017, 70, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lau, K.; Li, P.; Luk, K. A Monopolar Patch Antenna with Very Wide Impedance Bandwidth. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2005, 53, 1004–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Tak, J.; Choi, J. A low profile IR-UWB antenna with ring patch for WBAN applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. 2015, 14, 1447–1450. [Google Scholar]
  13. Yu, L.; Song, J.; Gao, Y.; He, K.; Gao, F. Low-Profile Dual-Polarized Omnidirectional Antenna for Broadband Indoor Distributed Antenna System. Prog. Electromag. Res. 2017, 67, 39–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhang, Z.Y.; Fu, G.; Wu, W.J.; Lei, J.; Gong, S.X. A wideband dual-sleeve monopole antenna for indoor base station application. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. 2011, 10, 45–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. He, K.; Gong, S.X.; Guo, D. Broadband omnidirectional distributed antenna for indoor wireless communication systems. Electron. Lett. 2016, 52, 1361–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Palud, S.; Colombel, F.; Himdi, M.; Meins, C.L. A Novel Broadband Eighth-Wave Conical Antenna. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2008, 56, 2112–2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shi, Y.; Amert, A.K.; Whites, K.W. Miniaturization of Ultrawideband Monocone Antennas Using Dielectric Loading. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2016, 64, 432–441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Koohestani, M.; Zürcher, J.F.; Moreira, A.A.; Skrivervik, A.K. A novel, low-profile, vertically-polarized UWB antenna for WBAN. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2014, 62, 1888–1894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhao, Y.; Shen, Z.; Wu, W. Wideband and Low-Profile Monocone Quasi-Yagi Antenna for Endfire Radiation. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. 2017, 16, 325–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Papas, C.H.; King, R. Input Impedance of Wide-Angle Conical Antennas Fed by a Coaxial Line. Proc. Inst. Radio Eng. 1949, 37, 1269–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Park, S.; Park, J.; Ahn, B.; Kim, K. Parametric studies for the optimum design of a hexagonal plate monopole antenna. J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci. 2006, 6, 53–61. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Monocone antenna fed by a coaxial line with infinite ground plane.
Figure 1. Monocone antenna fed by a coaxial line with infinite ground plane.
Applsci 09 01896 g001
Figure 2. The geometry of the proposed antenna design. (a) 3-D view of the proposed antenna, (b) 3-D view of the parasitic and circular sleeves, and (c) side view of the proposed antenna.
Figure 2. The geometry of the proposed antenna design. (a) 3-D view of the proposed antenna, (b) 3-D view of the parasitic and circular sleeves, and (c) side view of the proposed antenna.
Applsci 09 01896 g002
Figure 3. Simulated reflection coefficients of reference 1, reference 2, reference 3, and the proposed antennas.
Figure 3. Simulated reflection coefficients of reference 1, reference 2, reference 3, and the proposed antennas.
Applsci 09 01896 g003
Figure 4. The current distributions for (a) reference 1, (b) reference 2, and (c) proposed antenna.
Figure 4. The current distributions for (a) reference 1, (b) reference 2, and (c) proposed antenna.
Applsci 09 01896 g004
Figure 5. Simulated reflection coefficients for different radius ( R 2 ) values of the inner circular sleeve.
Figure 5. Simulated reflection coefficients for different radius ( R 2 ) values of the inner circular sleeve.
Applsci 09 01896 g005
Figure 6. Simulated reflection coefficients for different height ( H 2 ) values of the inner circular sleeve.
Figure 6. Simulated reflection coefficients for different height ( H 2 ) values of the inner circular sleeve.
Applsci 09 01896 g006
Figure 7. Simulated reflection coefficients for different height ( H 3 ) values of the outer circular sleeve.
Figure 7. Simulated reflection coefficients for different height ( H 3 ) values of the outer circular sleeve.
Applsci 09 01896 g007
Figure 8. Simulated reflection coefficients for different height ( H 4 ) values of the parasitic sleeve.
Figure 8. Simulated reflection coefficients for different height ( H 4 ) values of the parasitic sleeve.
Applsci 09 01896 g008
Figure 9. Simulated reflection coefficients for different width ( W 2 ) values of the shorting strip.
Figure 9. Simulated reflection coefficients for different width ( W 2 ) values of the shorting strip.
Applsci 09 01896 g009
Figure 10. Photograph of the fabricated antenna.
Figure 10. Photograph of the fabricated antenna.
Applsci 09 01896 g010
Figure 11. Simulated and measured reflection coefficients of the proposed antenna.
Figure 11. Simulated and measured reflection coefficients of the proposed antenna.
Applsci 09 01896 g011
Figure 12. Simulated and measured radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at (a) 0.91 GHz, (b) 2.48 GHz, (c) 4.07 GHz, and (d) 5.03 GHz.
Figure 12. Simulated and measured radiation patterns of the proposed antenna at (a) 0.91 GHz, (b) 2.48 GHz, (c) 4.07 GHz, and (d) 5.03 GHz.
Applsci 09 01896 g012aApplsci 09 01896 g012b
Figure 13. Simulated and measured maximum gains of the proposed antenna at the operating frequency band.
Figure 13. Simulated and measured maximum gains of the proposed antenna at the operating frequency band.
Applsci 09 01896 g013
Table 1. Dimensions of the proposed antenna.
Table 1. Dimensions of the proposed antenna.
Parameters R 1 R 2 R 3 R 4 H 1 H 2
Value (mm)5035511.4269
Parameters H 3 H 4 H 5 H 6 W 1 W 2
Value (mm)510152101
Table 2. Performance comparison between the literature and the proposed antenna.
Table 2. Performance comparison between the literature and the proposed antenna.
Ref.Dimensions ( λ m i n )
(Diameter × Height)
Operation Band (GHz)Fractional Bandwidth (%)
[5]0.364 × 0.0680.80–2.40100.0
[13]0.316 × 0.0700.73–3.88137.0
[16]0.267 × 0.1250.50–1.46123.5
[17]0.470 × 0.2352.41–7.98107.2
[18]0.202 × 0.0863.02–12.00118.7
[19]0.226 × 0.0655.60–18.00105.1
Proposed0.270 × 0.0700.81–5.34147.3

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Keum, K.-S.; Park, Y.-M.; Choi, J.-H. A Low-Profile Wideband Monocone Antenna Using Bent Shorting Strips. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1896. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091896

AMA Style

Keum K-S, Park Y-M, Choi J-H. A Low-Profile Wideband Monocone Antenna Using Bent Shorting Strips. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(9):1896. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091896

Chicago/Turabian Style

Keum, Kyo-Seung, Young-Mi Park, and Jae-Hoon Choi. 2019. "A Low-Profile Wideband Monocone Antenna Using Bent Shorting Strips" Applied Sciences 9, no. 9: 1896. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9091896

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop