Numeric Evaluation of Game-Theoretic Collaboration Modes in Supplier Development
Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
Please find the comments as the attachment.
Comments for author File: 
Comments.pdf
Author Response
Dear Reviewer, Thank you for the effort you are putting into our manuscript ''Numeric Evaluation of Game-Theoretic Collaboration Modes in Supplier Development''. We attached a pdf document contains detailed responses to all of your comments and a description of the corresponding changes. We give your original comments point by point and our answers right after that. Moreover, we uploaded the version of our revised manuscript. In the latter, all edits and changes are highlighted in blue in order to clearly indicate them. Yours faithfully,The Authors
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Reviewer 2 Report
1. The article is not consistency of Applied Sciences Journal.
2. The contribution of the paper is not clear, thus, the authors shall to clarify the contribution in the introduction.
3. Introduction is too long.
4. The presented method is a well-established simulation strategy to deal. What the novelty of your work compared to other published papers?
5. The added value of the work is not clear.
6. The literature is old and incomplete. The authors should improving the literature by references that are more recent (2018-2019).
Author Response
Dear Reviewer, Thank you for the effort you are putting into our manuscript ''Numeric Evaluation of Game-Theoretic Collaboration Modes in Supplier Development''. We attached a pdf document contains detailed responses to all of your comments and a description of the corresponding changes. We give your original comments point by point and our answers right after that. Moreover, we uploaded the version of our revised manuscript. In the latter, all edits and changes are highlighted in blue in order to clearly indicate them. Yours faithfully,The Authors
Author Response File: Author Response.pdf
Round 2
Reviewer 2 Report
I think it is well-written paper, now.
