Next Article in Journal
Mechanical Properties of Sandstone Cement-Stabilized Macadam
Next Article in Special Issue
A New Approach for Grid-Connected Hybrid Renewable Energy System Sizing Considering Harmonic Contents of Smart Home Appliances
Previous Article in Journal
Light Extraction Enhancement of InGaN Based Micro Light-Emitting Diodes with Concave-Convex Circular Composite Structure Sidewall
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Multi-Communication-Based Demand Response Implementation Structure and Control Strategy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Energy Management for Smart Homes—State of the Art

1
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
2
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB T6G 1H9, Canada
3
Department of Cybernetics, University of Hradec Kralove, 500 03 Hradec Kralove, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(17), 3459; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173459
Submission received: 30 June 2019 / Revised: 2 August 2019 / Accepted: 12 August 2019 / Published: 21 August 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Smart Home and Energy Management Systems 2019)

Abstract

:
Smart home is a concept that aims to enhance the comfort of residents and facilitate household activities. The smart home is an application of ubiquitous computing which can provide the user with context-aware automated or assistive services in the form of ambient intelligence, remote control of home appliances, or automation. Smart homes attempt to integrate smartness into homes to guarantee the residents’ convenience, safety, and security, while conserving the energy. The capabilities of a smart home in the context of different applications, have been scrutinized for this investigation. Different proposed architectures, protocols, and infrastructures have been taken into consideration. As the data management process is a vital part of a smart home system, many procedures of data collection, storage, and analysis have been surveyed. Methods of data acquisition has also been discussed. Existing challenges, pros, and cons of proposed schemes along with future perspectives of smart homes are identified in this report, which is intended to promote future research directions.

1. Introduction

Smart homes are an application of ubiquitous computing. Homes can be augmented with information and communication technologies (ICT) to provide the user with context-aware automated or assistive services in the form of ambient intelligence, remote home control, or home automation. To guarantee the residents’ convenience, security, and safety along with effective energy management within the residence, smart homes incorporate “smartness” into dwellings. Smart house, home automation, intelligent home, adaptive home, and aware house are synonyms used in literature for referring to the smart home [1].
In 1992, Lutolf provided the first definition for a smart home [2]. According to Lutolf, “the smart home concept is the integration of different services within a home by using a common communication system. It assures an economic, secure, and comfortable operation of the home and includes a high degree of intelligent functionality and flexibility.” This definition mostly emphasizes on home automation and does not consider intelligence and its application in a home [1]. Intelligence is significantly different to automation. Automation can be considered as a subset of an intelligence system; it encompasses a limited number of tasks and does not need an overall image of the environmental situation. The intelligence system has an overall image about the environmental situation, the tasks that are going on, and it is also able to predict the upcoming situation and make decisions to guarantee the safety and convenience of the residents [3].
In 2003, Intertek [4] published an elaborated definition for a smart home: “A smart home is a residence incorporating a communications network between electric household appliances and services”. Intertek’s definition emphasizes on remote access (to control or monitor) of the smart homes [1].
In 2006, Satpathy [5] provided a more intelligence-emphasized view of smart homes. According to Satpathy, “a home which is smart enough to assist the inhabitants to live independently and comfortably with the help of technology is termed as smart home. In a smart home, all the mechanical and digital devices are interconnected to form a network, which can communicate with each other and with the user to create an interactive space”. In this regard, the definitions of smart or intelligent also needs to be considered. According to Edwards and Grinter [6], a system needs to have the four following abilities to be called smart or intelligent in the smart home concept:
  • The ability to process the collected information from sensors to recognize the environmental situation.
  • The ability to figure out its state by considering multiple factors at once.
  • The ability to predict the user intent by analyzing the current situation.
  • The ability to preemptively act based on the intent assumption.
A smart or intelligent environment can be considered as an agent that has the ability to assess the residents’ position, state, and physical surroundings by processing the sensory data, and then make the required changes in the environment by using actuators to improve the energy efficiency within the home while keeping residents’ comfort at an acceptable level [7,8].
According to Darby [9] two kinds of definitions could be given for a smart home: Home- and user-focused definition and building- and system-focused definition. The former definition emphasizes comfort and convenience of buildings occupants while the latter definition concentrates on improving building energy performance. In both definitions the smart home required several communication links between devices, sensors, and actuators to be able to provide services.
Energy consumption has increased due to the rising population and expanding economy. The energy consumption will continue to increase with improved quality of life and the increment rates are expected to continue. More energy usage will lead to more greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions; this will have a serious impact on the global environment. In 2004, the building energy usage in the EU was 37% of the final energy, higher than other sectors such as the industry (28%) and transport (32%). Unlike the other sectors, there are great and attractive opportunities for reducing buildings’ energy consumption to have lower costs and higher returns. In 2017, the international energy agency (IEA) reported that employing digital technologies could reduce the energy consumption by 10% by exploiting real-time data to improve operational efficiency. In addition, smart demand-side responses could provide 185 gigawatts (GW) of system flexibility and avoid costly upgrades to electricity grids.
In 2007, energy consumption in the residential sector represented 21% of the total US demand. After the initial increase from 17% in 1950 to 20% in 1960, the amount has remained between 19% and 22% till today [10]. A great amount of home energy is consumed in an inefficient manner. Reports show that 40% of the global power consumption takes place within residential buildings [11]. The poor technology of energy management systems is the reason of this waste in homes. Technological systems can be improved using IT systems and their abilities for data management and processing. IT based monitoring and controlling technologies can play a significant role in energy management within homes; they have successfully eliminated the waste of energy in other sectors. While simple programmable thermostats were used by 28% of US homes in 2005, only 16% of these homes utilized the programmable function of their device [12]. An IT system can provide real-time energy consumption feedback to the occupant. It can provide useful details about the energy consumption of appliances during different times of the day and the total consumption of each section within the home, such as kitchen, rooms, etc. This information will be an economic motivation for consumers to improve their energy efficiency and change their energy consumption habits.
Sustainable development requirement and significant raise in energy costs have necessitated the reduction in energy consumption without compromising occupants’ comfort. Deploying intelligent energy management systems in buildings will lead to energy and cost savings. In this regard, the smart home concept has attracted great attention in the last decade because of its potentials in providing comfort and energy management to occupants.
The concept of “smart city” is now also well established. Smart city systems not only improve the inhabitants’ comfort, but also makes improvement in the efficient management of asset; this includes smart transportation systems, smart energy grids, and environmental monitoring. As a city’s founding elements, smart homes can exchange information with the city and coordinate activities essential to a smart city.
The motivation for this study is to identify and review smart home design/operation concepts and technologies that can reduce energy consumption without compromising occupants’ comfort. The study considers both the user- and building- approaches. Section 2 reviews several types of smart home architectures and focuses on Cloud-based architecture models. Section 3 is an overview of communication protocols used by interconnected devices in a smart home. Section 4 is a review of sensor technologies in a smart home; how sensor technologies can be used to monitor energy performance and associate them with household activities is addressed. Section 5 is a review of the inhabitants’ activity and concentrates on activity recognition and discovery approaches. Section 6 is an overview of smart schemes for energy management and briefly touches upon building energy system modelling and on the connection of smart homes and smart grids. A review of perspectives on future smart homes is provided in Section 7. The final Section 8 is a summary with major conclusions.

2. System Architecture

A smart home is the incorporation of automation (not smartness) and intelligent systems (smartness). Devices such as sensors and appliances (automation) are used to monitor and collect environmental information. These data can be stored and analyzed by the intelligent systems, and necessary changes to the environment are implemented through actuators based on the results of the analysis.
A smart home architecture should be deployed in a manner that satisfies the requirements of metering home conditions, processing instrumented data, and monitoring home appliances. Generally, a smart home architecture includes the following main elements [13]:
  • Microcontroller-enabled sensors to monitor home conditions.
  • Database/Data Store to store generated sensory data and cloud services for data analysis and visualization; also serves as a queue for commands being sent to actuators.
  • Microcontroller-enabled actuators to implement required changes within the environment; microcontrollers send commands to actuators via the cloud services.
  • Server/API layer to process the received sensory data and store the data in database. In addition to the sensory data, it stores the control commands received from web applications and provides the commands to actuators upon their requests.
  • Web applications serve as a cloud service to facilitate the measuring and visualization of sensory data, and to enable remote control (via mobile device) of appliances.
There are many types of architectures proposed for smart homes. The system-based architecture, proposed by Soliman et al. [13], is a scheme of sensors and actuators connected to the microcontroller. Sensors collect information about the environment and the microcontroller makes required changes to the environment through actuators. The physical layer-based architecture, proposed by Cook et al. [14], consists of computer servers, environmental monitoring sensors and detectors, and actuators. The scalable model architecture, proposed by Jie et al. [15], uses a uniform interface model to add or remove the model from the infrastructure of smart homes with less effort. The cloud-based architecture (CloudThings), proposed by Zhou et al. [16], aims to speed up the Internet of things (IoT) application, development, and management by providing Internet access to end devices. A simplified cloud-based architecture is illustrated in Figure 1. The internal network consists of appliances, sensors, and actuators. These devices communicate with a gateway located at the network edge which connects the local network to a wide area network such as the Internet. The gateway is a key component of the cloud-based architecture. It supports multiple communication protocols and can easily communicate with end devices [17]; it also has sufficient processing power to perform some data processing before pushing it to the cloud. In addition, the gateway plays a network security layer role for the smart home. Since all communication among the end devices and the outer networks should pass through the gateway, it has the ability to filter the messages before commands make any changes to the end devices which do not possess high level of security and are more vulnerable to attacks [3].
By employing Internet-connected devices, smart homes face privacy and security concerns in general. Interested readers may find a detailed review of these concerns in our previous study [3].
In a smart home, information collected by different resources can be aggregated and processed in the cloud. The cloud is the highest level of the architecture [18] which provides reliable, scalable and autonomous data storage, and the necessary infrastructure for data processing [19,20]. The cloud-computing model had a good performance in the last decade; however, recently due to the increase in the number of IoT devices uploading data onto the cloud, this model has faced some problems. The most critical problem is the bandwidth limitation. Although CPU processing power had increased during the last decade, the bandwidth for data transmission did not [21]. As a result, the network bandwidth has become a bottleneck that affects the performance of the cloud -based architecture. To alleviate this problem, Fog and Edge computing were proposed.
In Fog computing, first coined by Cisco in 2014 [22], the processor is brought closer to where data are generated. The data processing is done between the source and the cloud, prior to being pushed to the cloud. In a smart home with the fog computing architecture, a gateway will do data processing since the gateway is closer to the data source. Data transmission between end devices and gateways is sped-up. The gateways will compress the data received from various sources and will send the compressed data to the cloud for further computation. Less bandwidth is needed to transmit to the cloud in comparison with the original method [3]. Fog computing offers several advantages such as deduction of data size sent to the cloud, reducing the latency of network, improving the response time of the system and single point of failure avoidance [23]. However, Fog computing has some security weaknesses and privacy issues [24,25]. In comparison with Fog computing, Edge computing gives each end device the capability to decide if the data need to be stored locally, analyzed locally, or need to be sent to the cloud [3]. Edge computing has a more localized or at-source computation. Edge computing has the similar advantages and disadvantages as Fog computing [26,27].

3. Communication Protocols

In a smart home, devices need to communicate with each other to be able to exchange data. For making an efficient decision and changes, the intelligence system needs to have a detailed image of the environment. As a single sensor is not enough, several sensors are needed to collect various type of useful information (temperature, humidity, occupant’s behaviour, etc.). To expand the functionality of collected information, sensors need to communicate as well. Communication protocols determine the manner in which these devices and sensors can mutually interconnect [3].
Smart home networks are expected to be based on wireless sensor networks and machine-to-machine (M2M) communications protocols [28]. Considering the transmission medium, the communication protocols are classified into following groups:
  • Wired
  • Wireless
  • Hybrid (which use both wired and wireless media)
Body area networks (BAN), personal area networks (PAN), and local area networks (LAN) are the most common type of area networks used in smart homes [3]. Among different network topologies, a mesh network is the ideal one for wireless communication indoors because of obstacles such as walls and furniture [19].
Choosing the right communication protocol could be done based on the case and the following concerns [3]:
  • Range of Coverage
  • Level of security
  • Level of power consumption
  • Network size
Another factor in the communication protocol selection is the price. For example, the cost of the ZigBee License is multiple of that charged for Z-Wave devices [29]. While the most popular communication protocol among smart home researchers and academic studies is ZigBee [30], the Z-Wave protocol has more vendors and is widely used in practical projects, mainly due to its interoperability. According to the Z-Wave Alliance, over 94 million Z-Wave products have been sold since 2001 [31].

3.1. Wired Communication Protocol

Wired communication is one of the oldest methods of information transmission. Wired communication protocols use a wire medium for data transmission and can be categorized as in Table 1 [3].

3.2. Wireless Communication Protocols

The protocols use radio frequency (RF) signals for transmitting and receiving data. The protocol has lower setup costs and has the ease of network expansions. Wireless communication protocols can be categorized as shown in Table 2 [3].
Advantages and disadvantages of wired and wireless communication protocols are summarized in Table 3.

4. Sensors in Smart Home

A smart home aims to improve its occupants’ security, convenience, and energy management by facilitating the information and communication technologies. One of the most influencing factors on home energy usage is occupant behaviour. There are many environmental parameters that can be measured in a smart house, such as room temperatures, humidity, etc. These sensors have been described and investigated in many other studies; thus, they are not addressed in this report. This section concentrates on sensors that can be used to extract occupants’ behaviour information; the following section will focus on tracking inhabitants’ activity.
Monitoring and classification of residents’ activities strongly depend on the sensor’s and reliability. Sensor effectiveness largely depends on the type of activity which needs to be monitored [32]. Two main categories of sensors can be distinguished [33]: Wearable and nonwearable sensors. While wearable sensors allow for higher localization accuracy and can detect body movements and vital health metrics [34], nonwearable sensors are considered less intrusive and do not require any interaction from the user’s side. Wearable sensors may also have harsher power consumption requirements. However, in some cases, the wearable sensors might be part of or make use of devices the user is familiar with and normally carries with them, such as a wristwatch or a cell phone [33].

4.1. Wearable Sensors

Wearable sensors aim to measure the motion characteristics, location, pulse rate, body temperature, blood pressure, and other vital signs of users. These sensors are usually attached to a person directly (e.g., bracelet sensors or cardio sensors) or attach to their clothes (e.g., an accelerometer or a step counter). Table 4 is a summary of wearable sensors that are used for activity recognition and activities of daily living (ADL) classification.
  • Accelerometers—Accelerometers are the most popular sensors for movement and activity recognition [35,36]. These sensors usually attached to a specified part of the human body. Location accelerometers are able to distinguish various types of movement (e.g., running, walking, sitting, scrubbing, etc.) [37,38] or assist to figure out the user posture [39]. Sometimes, accelerometers are employed to detect falls by measuring acceleration [40]. To improve the accelerometers performance and enrich the collected information, accelerometers are often employed together with gyroscopes [41].
  • Hand-worn sensors—These sensors are widely used in several activity recognitions. Wristwatches, magnetic sensors, and other types of bracelets are classified into this group. To improve the wristwatch ability in hand gesture recognition, accelerometers are integrated to wristwatches [42]. J. Merilahti et al. [43] employed a wrist-worn activity detector to classify users’ sleep/awake activities. K. Van Laerhoven et al. [44] combined inertial sensors, accelerometers, and tilt switches in a wrist-worn sensor to recognize the daily activities of the user. Since different electrical devices emit different magnetic fields, hand-worn magnetic sensors which have the capability to distinguish differences among magnetic fields are employed to recognize the activity of a user [45]. Usually emergency buttons are designed for wristwatch, which can be used to ask for help [46].
  • Smartphones—Various ranges of sensors such as accelerometers, gyroscopes, a global positioning system, a magnetometer, and a microphone integrated in smartphones. These sensors provide rich information about the user’s movement and activities [47,48].
  • RFID tags—These types of sensors are mostly used for finding the interaction of occupants with particular objects and for detecting the cooking, eating, and drinking within the home, Sangho Park et al. [49] attached RFID tags on various kitchen utensils such as cutlery and dishes. Similar setups are also considered in [50,51,52]. RFID tags are used for dressing failures detection by Matic et al. [53]. Often, RFID sensors are used in combination with other sensors such as accelerometers [54].
In addition to these sensors, there is also a large variety of sensors that monitor persons’ vital signs [33]. These sensors allow for the monitoring of a large set of human vital signs, anomaly detection, and supporting activity recognition and classification.

4.2. Nonwearable Sensors

Nonwearable sensors are usually installed in fixed objects or locations of a house or a room and can detect occupants and their movements. Nonwearable sensors have the capability to identify the usage of objects, measure water flow, room temperature, or door openings/closings. Table 5 is a summary of different types of nonwearable sensors which were used for monitoring the occupants’ daily activities.
  • Infrared (IR)—IR sensors are widely used in most of activities of daily living (ADL) classification studies and projects [55,56,57,58,59,60]. They are employed to find out the occupants’ presence, motion detection in particular areas, and finding the occupants’ location within the home. M. Skubic et al. [61] deployed a passive IR (PIR) sensor to detect the usage of stoves and ovens.
  • Ultrasonic sensors—Based on their capability for distance measurement, these sensors are usually used for occupant localization and presence detection. In some studies like [62,63,64], a combination of ultrasonic sensors together with other sensors were employed for monitoring the occupants daily behaviour. In other studies, ultrasonic sensors were used to obtain precise pacing trajectories and to be able to recognize the ones that were abnormal [65,66].
  • Photoelectric sensors—These sensors have the capability to detect a light. When the intensity of lighting becomes greater or less than a threshold value, the device would be triggered and generate a signal. This type of sensor is not widely used; however, in some projects, they are used as a presence detection sensor [46,67,68].
  • Video-based sensors—In some monitoring approaches a camera is mounted in a particular location of a house for movement and activity detection. It should be noted that the performance of video-based sensors can be affected in an environment with low lights [69]. However, a video camera-based approach can violate the privacy of the residents. In this regard, low-resolution thermal sensors have been proposed to be used instead of a video camera to mitigate the privacy concerns [70,71].
  • Vibration sensors—These sensors have the capability to detect a person falling [61,72], identifying interaction with various objects [73], flushing toilets, or detecting water flows [74,75].
  • Pressure sensors—These sensors are mostly used for steps and fall detection. They are usually deployed in the floor of the monitoring space [46,61]. Joon-Ho Lim et al. [76] installed pressure sensors not only in floors but also in furniture to find useful activity information.
  • Magnetic switches—They are usually employed to find whether doors or cupboards are opened or closed. These sensors have the ability to provide information on users entering specific rooms and opening dressers, refrigerators, or trash cans [33].
  • Audio sensors—They are employed to detect sounds in houses and distinguish various types of sounds. In [63,77] microphones were installed for sounds classification and identifying speech, phone ringing, dish clanging. M. Popescu et al. [78] installed a series of acoustic sensors to detect a person falling.
  • Wattmeter—A Wattmeter and other sensors that meter electricity usage of household appliances and light are often used in determining activities of daily living. Today, electricity consumption can be considered as one of the main indicators of well-being of a resident [79]. G. C. Franco et al. [80], considered electricity consumption of room lights and different appliances to record electrical activities and recognize specified activities of daily living. Tang Yi Ping et al. [81] monitored domestic energy together with other sensors to find abnormalities and monitor the person’s well-being and safety status.
It is necessary to mention that sensors with the ability to provide rich information about occupants’ activities and biometrics can raise serious privacy concerns. Figure 2 shows the richness of the sensory data versus the privacy concern. As the figure illustrates, the sensors that provide rich information about their users rarely can be perceived as privacy-preserving. For example, the video camera provides detailed information about all residents’ activities but cannot be used in most rooms due to heavy privacy violations. In contrast, magnetic switches can be deployed in every place within the house, but they do not provide complete information about every human activity. The data richness of magnetic switches or any other low-informative sensors can be partly improved by the usage of multiple instances of these sensors. However, this comes at the increased installation cost and deployment complexity [33].

5. Inhabitants’ Activity Tracking

An important factor that influences energy consumption within the home is occupant behaviour. Tracking the occupants’ activity within the home or, in other words, activity discovery, recognition, and prediction play a significant role in a smart home concept. This can be called the vital part of a smart home system due to its effect on both occupants’ comfort and building energy management. “Action” and “activity” are the terms that are commonly used for describing physical behaviours. They are used interchangeably in some cases but in other cases they are used to interpret different complexity and duration of behaviours [82].
The occupants’ activity can be goal-oriented, and it could be complicated. The activity could be as simple as a single objective and collection of serial events or it could be as complex as a multi-objective and non-sequential collection of happenings. Concurrent and interleaved activities can be considered as a complex activity. Consider the following as an example of a concurrent activity: An occupant in his activity of going to the bathroom passes by the laundry room to load and schedule the washing machine. In this example, there are two purposes in the activity: Scheduling the washing machine and taking a shower. As an example of the interleaved activity, consider the occupant responding to a ringing-phone while cooking in the kitchen. In this scenario the occupant should stop the cooking activity and pick up the phone; when the conversation is finished, the occupant returns to the cooking activity [83].
As discussed in the previous section, tracking the occupants’ activity depends on the type and accuracy of sensors used within the house. In addition to the sensors, for monitoring the occupant’s activity at the household, a smart home system needs to use activity recognition mediums. The smart home system needs to be able to recognize the occupant’s activities, so it is necessary that the activities be categorized based on types or significant features. As sensory data has a temporal-ordered nature, the recognition-of-activity classification would be equally challenging as the sequence classification (SC) problem. There are three general SC methods [84]:
  • Featured-based classification
  • Sequence distance-based classification
  • Model-based classification
In the featured-based methods, first a sequence will be transformed into a feature vector and then conventional classification methods such as k-gram and pattern-based feature selection will be applied [85]. In the sequence distance-based methods, the similarity of the sequences will be measured by the distance function and then the classification quality will be determined (e.g., K nearest neighbour classifier and support vector machine) [86], model-based methods using the Hidden Markov Model (HMM) and other statistical models for sequence classification [87].
Generally, the data generated by sensors can be analyzed from two aspects: Lower-sensory level and higher-activity level [88]. The lower-level analysis classifies activities using data read from the sensors. The higher-level analysis analyzes the classified labels of activities for further processes of decision-making. In the lower-level analysis, according to the availability of data instance, supervised learning is employed to learn the data instance model. This process is well known as activity recognition (AR). To discover activity labels without having data instance, an unsupervised learning approach can be used, popularly known as the activity discovery (AD) process. There are a variety of classification techniques such as information theory, statistics, machine learning, data mining, ontologies, and others.

5.1. Activity Recognition

“The process of matching predefined activity classes to the data received from sensors is called activity recognition” [14], which is a supervised learning approach. The recognition algorithm could be a support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT), instance-based learner (IB) or a neural network (NN) [89]. The activity recognition process can be roughly characterized by following steps [82]:
  • Selection and installation of suitable sensors for monitoring a user’s activity together with changes in the environment.
  • Collecting, saving, and processing perceived information through data analysis techniques and/or knowledge representation formalisms at proper levels of abstraction.
  • Creating computational activity models in a manner that enable software systems/agents to conduct reasoning and manipulation.
  • Selection or development of reasoning algorithms to infer activities from sensor data.
Considering the sensor types for activity monitoring, activity recognition can be divided to two categories [82]:
  • Vision-based activity recognition: It is based on visual sensors deployment, like video cameras, for monitoring a person’s behaviour within the environment. The generated sensory data are video sequences or digitized visual data. The methods in this category use computer vision techniques, including feature extraction, structural modelling, action extraction, movement tracking and segmentation, for analyzing visual observations for pattern recognition.
  • Sensor-based activity recognition: It is based on the use of sensor technologies to monitor activities. The generated sensory data are mainly the time series of state changes and/or various parameter values that are usually processed through data fusion, probabilistic, or statistical analysis approaches, and formal knowledge technologies for activity recognition.

5.2. Activity Discovery

There are always data that does not belong to any of the targeted classes of activity. One solution for handling unlabeled data is designing an unsupervised learning method [14,90] to recognize activities from unlabeled sensor data. Unsupervised learning can be defined as the process of data analysis for knowledge discovery or required data pattern by finding the repetition of data co-occurrence in sensory data. It is important to discover activity patterns from unlabeled data; this can be used to characterize and analyze as much behavioural data as possible, not just predefined activity classes. Researchers need to test and model such unlabeled data to find a complete view of everyday life [14].
To improve the performance of activity recognition, unlabeled data should be segmented into smaller classes. The association rule mining (ARM) analysis is an example of this approach. Activity discovery possesses the challenge of sequence mining; an example of sequence mining is the episode discovery (ED) algorithm [90] and greedy search [14]. In the episodic discovery a predefined window size will be moved along sensory data for collecting the interesting sequences. Later, for evaluating the sequences, the minimum description length (MDL) principle is applied to evaluate sequences by considering their length, frequency of occurrence, or periodicity. For finding the sequence (i.e., sensor’s events) it is best to compress the input dataset and removed redundancy. The greedy search algorithm is best suited.
Activity prediction will enable the smart home to react along the occupants’ actions. The smart home needs to figure out the human activity in real time which would be possible by enhancing the activity recognition and prediction capability of the smart home. Many studies have been done in this regard.

6. Energy Management

Optimization of energy consumption while preserving residents’ convenience is one of the most significant intentions of a smart home. Building energy and comfort management (BECM) systems are proposed as control systems for individual buildings or groups of buildings which performs monitoring, data storage, and communication utilizing computers and distributed microprocessors [91]. BECM aims to attenuate energy consumption within building operations while attaining acceptable levels of convenience for occupants. Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) control, hot water control, lighting control, and electricity control are often considered as necessary functions of the BECM system. This section propounds smart energy management schemes by focusing on the energy system modelling and the correlation of smart homes and smart grids.

6.1. Smart Home and Smart Grid

As energy consumption has become a global concern within the last decade, energy efficiency and utilization of renewable energy resources became feasible with the advent of the smart grid (SG) concept and modernizing the electricity grid. A significant number of SG infrastructure specifications presented in the earliest first official definition [92], is in affiliation with smart homes, such as demand-side management and timely provision of energy price information.
A smart grid can significantly enhanced energy efficiency within distributed networks and demand response (DR) is considered a substantial characteristic of a smart grid [93]. Within smart homes the cooperation of low precedence home appliances like washing machines and water heaters allows DR to utilize energy sources at lower prices. Energy scheduling can be classified as scheduling the resource of energy (i.e., when particular energy sources are utilized), and scheduling the consumption of energy (i.e., when various home appliances should be operating).
The smart home energy management system (HEMS) is introduced as a device operating within the building to collect, store, and analyze the energy consumption information of the home. HEMS schedules the operating time of appliances in order to augment the efficiency and attenuate the electricity expenditure, taking into account if the usage of appliances are schedulable or not [94]. A smart grid is dependent on smart homes. Homes that utilize smart appliances enables data collection via sensors and smart meters, which facilitates optimization of electricity requirements and reduces the electricity cost. Smart grids can also take advantage of the electricity generated on-site and exported to the grid.

6.2. Smart Energy Management

Although the energy management term has been employed in various investigations, in this work our focus is on buildings’ energy management which involves internal heat gain and occupant comfort. The driven loads and heat gains of appliances has two categories. The first category correlates with responsive loads and specifies that the user can change the behaviour of the appliance because of a price signal, such as lights, plug loads, washing machines, dryers, dishwashers, cooking stoves, and microwaves. The second category correlates with unresponsive loads and specifies that the user cannot change the behaviour of the appliance without employment of additional technologies, such as refrigerator and freezer loads [95]. In the smart electricity grid, users are able to produce power (in-home energy) from distributive generation units. The home energy management (HEM) system in the smart grid empowers demand response (DR) and demand-side management (DSM) programs. DR assists in management and alteration of electricity usage responding to electricity supply while DSM emphasizes planning, implementation, and evaluation of policies and techniques that reduce users’ energy consumption and or costs. Various optimization schemes, protocols, and standards have been proposed for effective coordination of domestic appliances and distributed energy resources (DER) to attenuate the peak load and energy consumption expenses. This is an ongoing investigation across the world at academic, industrial and at government level.

6.2.1. Energy Management by Considering Pricing Scheme

Different pricing schemes have been used by the distribution companies in order to create an efficient energy management scheme. The pricing schemes proposed so far are real-time pricing, time of use pricing, critical peak pricing, day ahead pricing. In real-time pricing, the consumer is notified about the charges on an hourly basis. In time of use pricing, the consumer is charged more during peak periods, less during mid-peak, and least during off-peak. An energy management that links fee structure and scheduling of appliances operation can be used to minimize cost of energy. One example is the in-home energy management (iHEM) [96]. iHEM utilizes smart appliances, a central energy management unit (EMU), and wireless sensor networks for communication between the appliances, EMU, and smart smart meters. The EMU communicates with a smart meter to inquire about the updated charges. Occupants’ requirements are processed in near real-time, then iHEM suggest a convenient start time to the consumer. The consumer at this phase may be willing to negotiate with EMU. The decision support tool (DsT) proposed in [97] has the main intention to assist users make smart decisions during their appliances operation. In the absence of energy management programs, 30% of the load occurs in the course of peak hours. By employing iHEM, the peak load can be decreased to 5% [98]. iHEM also attenuates carbon emission and energy consumption expenses. In order to take advantage from the time of use pricing and reduce energy expense, appliance coordination have been proposed in [99] with the objective of shifting the consumer load to off-peak periods. The work indicates that the consumer’s cooperation in the energy management program improves the efficiency of the method.
Benefits of an energy management program may be increased if distributed energy resources (DER) coordination is adopted in parallel with the appliance coordination [100]. In [97], the concept of the DER coordination has been assessed. The net benefit of the consumer is maximized by scheduling the controllable DER conforming the scheduling algorithm. The consumer’s energy bill is decreased by 16%–25% [97].

6.2.2. Energy Management by Considering Household Occupancy

Occupant behaviour has an extensive impact on energy consumption and building controls. Unaware energy consumption can add one-third to a building’s designed energy performance [101]. Former research has demonstrated that utilization of real-time occupancy information for controlling the lighting can save a remarkable amount of the electrical energy used for lighting [102]. Recent investigation is concentrated on the development of energy intelligent buildings that incorporates residents’ activities and behaviour as a significant element for energy management systems. A home automation system should be able to recognize whether or not a house is occupied [103]. In addition, many home automation systems also require forecasting when a house is going to be occupied. When a home is not occupied, the automation system will turn off or dim all the artificial lighting, reducing ventilation rate, and setback the heating setpoint. Upon predicted occupancy, the system can trigger heating in advance to heat the house back to the normal setpoint prior to occupancy [103].
A smart heating system should tackle two primary requirements: Reducing energy consumption while maintaining the comfort of occupants. The smartness of the system typically depends on its ability of adaption to prevalent environmental circumstances, the household specifications, and the behaviour of the residents. Utilizing information and communication technology to automatically and intelligently control heating systems has been investigated for years. Smart space conditioning devices, such as the Neurothermostat [104], the GPS Thermostat [105], the Smart Thermostat [106], NEST learning thermostat, and Eco Bee’s Smart-Si [107], and several others [53,108,109,110,111,112], have been appeared.

6.3. Building Energy System Modelling

Building energy systems (BES) support the operations within a house, such as space heating, data transmitting, and operating appliances. BES regulates the energy consumption of the buildings by employing physical equipment or machinery, or even exerting a procedure that contains an integration [113]. In order to manage, predict, and optimize the operations of these systems and houses, numerical models have been created to simulate the energy consumption. Regardless of various structures that are proposed as models that simulate the buildings energy system, an energy system model contains three modules including input parameters, output parameters, and the system itself [114], this is demonstrated in Figure 3.
As Figure 3 indicates, the input variables known as regressor or forcing variables operate within the building’s energy system. For instance, a thermostat set point is considered as a controllable input variable. In contrast, solar radiation, outdoor air temperature, and wind speed are acknowledged as variables with uncontrollable variables, these can only be predicted by suitable techniques. For an energy system within a building, room air space temperature and humidity are regarded as output variables that explain the response of the building’s energy system to input variables. Output variables of a BES model in certain occasions can be the net energy consumption or the energy utilization itself [115]. A BES modelling architecture is mainly categorized as: Forward approach and data-driven approach [115,116,117].
A BES model can be developed utilizing a forward procedure. This comprises the forecast of output variables from a comprehensive architecture and parameter of the model conformed to a set of input variables. Models that are developed with execution of this approach are recognized as white-box models; these are extremely precise since the energy transmission procedures are mapped into the development of the BES modelling structure. Augmented trends of integrity in computing schemes enabled the development of precise BES models which indicates the fact that BES does not rely on constructive development and preserves time and energy. Forward modelling of BES is carried out within the preliminary design and analysis phase.
Data driven approaches, which can be further categorized into grey- and black-box models, empower development of BES model by comprehending both input and output data. This type data is either already known or attained within performed evaluations throughout experimental procedures. In this scheme, the BES model is structured utilizing a single-variable or multi-variable regression analysis performed among quantified output variables of energy usage, occupancy, solar and wind data, etc. Regression models are either statistical or relies on primary engineering formulation of energy consumption in buildings. Long-term simulations require time-consuming and prohibitive arrangements to capture the variables within the simulation duration. In this case artificial learning methods such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) and Fourier series are employed to estimate the parameters of the underlying model. However, in most cases the identified BES model parameters indicate minor physical significances which decrements the amount of data to be measured using the artificial learning or searching techniques that preserves significant amount of time and memory. Moreover, BES model parameters are evaluated based on genuine performance data and data driven models happen to be precise considering the computational intelligence and power.
To formulate a physical model to demonstrate the architecture, the physical arrangement of the building, or HVAC&R equipment or system, a grey box scheme is utilized. This scheme recognizes significant parameters and accumulates physical parameters and specifications through statistical analysis [116]. The aforementioned approach acquires expertise user contribution within the configuration of proper modelling equations and estimation of parameters. Although intrusive experimental protocol is essential for convenient parameter assessment, this scheme enables fault detection and diagnosis (FDD) and online control which is applicable on the energy utilization of the whole building. Instances of parameter estimation investigation toward building’s energy consumption are studied in [116,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129].

7. Future Perspective on Smart Homes

This section aims to look at future smart homes and the services that smart homes would provide for residents to guarantee their comfort and safety. To investigate the connection of smart homes to other smart environments, vehicle-to-home (V2H) connectivity and the home-based healthcare network concept are used as samples.
A connected car is a vehicle in which the driver and passengers would be able to access, use, and share information within vehicular communications systems, such as vehicle-to-vehicle (V2V) or vehicle-to-infrastructure (V2I) communications [130]. Connected car service industries have been gradually increasing in size and number, and they are extending their services to incorporate home connectivity [131]. Integration of vehicles and smart home functionalities would enable drivers to control lighting, appliances, heating, entertainment systems, or garage doors before arriving home [132,133]. Quddus et al. [134] proposed a map-matching algorithm for navigation, and Duri et al. [135] developed an in-vehicle data framework that ensures security and privacy of drivers. Godoy et al. [136] improved the performance of telematics through a system based on the Zigbee suite of communication protocols. Moreover, Resin et al. [137] proposed a future wireless technology to connect a vehicle with a home. Recently the concept of V2H connectivity has been addressed in optimization of energy expenses using plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEV). Using PHEV as backup generator [138], electricity generation sharing [139] and electricity storage [140] have been studied.
As the demographic is changing, all aspects of our society will be affected. The aging population is one of the major alterations that causes a significant impact since estimations indicates that the global median age will be 36.8 by 2050 [141]. Additionally, according to the World Health Organization, almost 10% of the population experience some form of disability. As a result of these demographic alterations, there is a huge demand for health and social care services.
Home healthcare services main intention were transmission of patients’ health status to devoted data centres, particularly for circumstances like elderly dependency or social isolation. Technology development and increment of health expenses has resulted in decentralization of healthcare from the hospital to the home. Healthcare can be obtained more efficiently in the home in comparison with hospitals. The ‘smart home’ equipped with appropriate sensors can serve as a centre component of the healthcare service system [142,143,144]. The smart home can provide tele-consultation, virtual visits, and monitoring [145,146]. There is a strong belief that the user-centred, home-based systems will be appointed as the foundation of healthcare in the future.
Operating devices that monitor health and activity or provide assistance in the home must be non-obtrusive and accepted by users. Moreover, privacy and confidentiality require to be considered while the moral and legal matters of ‘monitored’ living requires to be settled in order to enhance admissibility before the technology is widely promoted.
The Gator Tech Smart House in Gainesville, Florida, is the result of more than five years of investigations on the application of pervasive and mobile computing in-home-based healthcare services [147]. The goal of the project is providing assistive habitat that is able to sense not only itself but also its residents. This house could be the good example of smart homes in future.

8. Summary and Conclusions

Smart homes are provisioned with technology that monitors the residents and supplies proactive services. The primary objectives of smart home systems are providing convenience, augmenting security, and preserving energy.
All smart homes emphasize energy management and comfort and safety of their inhabitants. To achieve these goals, the smart home needs to be conscious of its environment. Monitoring the environment is strongly dependent on underlying sensor technologies. Furthermore, a smart home must scrutinize the sensor generated data to make decisions and required changes within the environment. This clearly demonstrates the importance of activity recognition and prediction medium in the smart home concept.
Energy performance of smart homes requires consideration of building properties, in addition to behaviour of their occupants and state of the environment. To analyze the dynamic thermal behaviour of buildings, a suitable model needs to be selected. The grey box modelling appears to provide the most effective scheme for energy consumption management of buildings.
There are two focused areas defined for smart homes: Users and buildings. These two areas have a strong connection with each other in energy management and inhabitants’ comfort. Most energy management schemes presented in the literature rely on scheduling and shifting consumption from peak-load time to low-load time. However, to attain effective energy management, it is necessary to integrate the occupant activity and behaviour as a critical element to construct energy and comfort management (BECM) systems. In addition to occupant detection, it is necessary to predict the occupants’ state to avoid loss of comfort; this poses a challenge for future research and development in the area of smart homes. Another challenge is future convergence of multiple existing IoT services to create new ones, for example car–home connectivity and home-based healthcare.
In conclusion, it is expected that smart homes will become more and more important in the near future. This will intensify the demand for effective energy management considering the occupants’ comfort. Several other challenges still need to be addressed in the context of smart homes, such as deploying efficient sensor technologies, activity recognition and prediction, methods for data storage and analysis. In addition, future smart homes will co-exist with other smart technologies and require convergence of corresponding networks and services. This clearly illustrates the multidisciplinary nature of this area and requires the involvement of number of specialists in developing future smart homes.

Author Contributions

All authors substantially contributed to the work presented in this paper. Conceptualization and methodology, Y.C. and P.M.; Literature review and writing—original draft preparation, B.L.; Writing—review and editing, Y.C. and P.M. Supervision—P.M.; Funding acquisition and project administration, Y.C.

Funding

The research was funded by Natural Science and Engineering Research Council (NSERC), grant number CRDPJ 530932-18. The article processing charges were waived by MDPI following a collaborative agreement.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alam, M.R.; Reaz, M.B.I.; Ali, M.A.M. A Review of Smart Homes-Past, Present, and Future. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C 2012, 42, 1190–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lutolf, R. Smart home concept and the integration of energy meters into a home-based system. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Metering Apparatus and Tariffs for Electricity Supply 1992, Glasgow, UK, 17–19 November 1992; pp. 277–278. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mocrii, D.; Chen, Y.; Musilek, P. IoT-based smart homes: A review of system architecture, software, communications, privacy and security. Internet Things 2018, 1, 81–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Intertek, Housing Learning and Improvement Network factsheet, Intertek Research and Testing Center for the Department of Trade and Industry, DTI Smart Homes Project. London, UK, September 2003. Available online: https://www.housinglin.org.uk/_assets/Resources/Housing/Housing_advice/Smart_Home_-_A_definition_September_2003.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2018).
  5. Satpathy, L. Smart Housing: Technology to Aid Aging in Place. New Opportunities and Challenges, Mississippi State University, MS, 2006. Available online: https://search.proquest.com/docview/305315332 (accessed on 5 August 2018).
  6. Edwards, W.K.; Grinter, R.E. At home with ubiquitous computing: Seven challenges. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Proceedings of the International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Atlanta GR, USA, 30 September–2 October 2001; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Cook, D.; Das, S.K. Smart Environments: Technology, Protocols, and Applications; Wiley-Interscience: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2005; ISBN 0-471-54448-5. [Google Scholar]
  8. Das, S.K.; Cook, D.J.; Battacharya, A.; Heierman, E.O.; Lin, T.-Y. The role of prediction algorithms in the MavHome smart home architecture. IEEE Wirel. Commun. 2002, 9, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Darby, S.J. Smart technology in the home: Time for more clarity. Build. Res. Inf. 2018, 46, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Annual Energy Review 2004, Energy Information Administration, US Department of Energy, Report No. DOE/EIA-0384, Table 2.1a. 2004. Available online: http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/txt/ptb0201a.html (accessed on 19 August 2005).
  11. Ullah, M.N.; Mahmood, A.; Razzaq, S.; Ilahi, M.; Khan, R.D.; Javaid, N. A Survey of Different Residential Energy Consumption Controlling Techniques for Autonomous DSM in Future Smart Grid Communications. arXiv 2013, arXiv:1306.1134. [Google Scholar]
  12. Meyers, R.J.; Williams, E.D.; Matthews, H.S. Scoping the potential of monitoring and control technologies to reduce energy use in homes. Energy Build. 2010, 42, 563–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Soliman, M.; Abiodun, T.; Hamouda, T.; Zhou, J.; Lung, C.-H. Smart home: Integrating internet of things with web services and cloud computing. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 5th International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science, Bristol, UK, 2–5 December 2013. [Google Scholar]
  14. Cook, D.J.; Crandall, A.S.; Thomas, B.L.; Krishnan, N.C. CASAS: A Smart Home in a Box. Computer 2013, 46, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jie, Y.; Pei, J.Y.; Jun, L.; Yun, G.; Wei, X. Smart home system based on IoT technologies. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Computational and Information Sciences, Shiyang, China, 21–23 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
  16. Zhou, J.; Leppanen, T.; Harjula, E.; Ylianttila, M.; Ojala, T.; Yu, C.; Jin, H.; Yang, L.T. Cloudthings: A common architecture for integrating the internet of things with cloud computing. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 17th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD), Whistler, BC, Canada, 27–29 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
  17. Guoqiang, S.; Yanming, C.; Chao, Z.; Yanxu, Z. Design and implementation of a smart IoT gateway. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Green Computing and Communications and IEEE Internet of Things and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing, Beijing, China, 20–23 August 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. Xu, L.D.; He, W.; Li, S. Internet of Things in Industries: A Survey. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2014, 10, 2233–2243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Stojkoska, B.L.R.; Trivodaliev, K.V. A review of Internet of Things for smart home: Challenges and solutions. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 140, 1454–1464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gubbi, J.; Buyya, R.; Marusic, S.; Palaniswami, M. Internet of Things (IoT): A vision, architectural elements, and future directions. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 2013, 29, 1645–1660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Carvalho, C. The Gap between Processor and Memory Speeds. 2002. Available online: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/6ebe/c8701893a6770eb0e19a0d4a732852c86256.pdf (accessed on 15 June 2012).
  22. Fog Computing and the Internet of Things: Extend the Cloud to Where the Things Are. 2015. Available online: https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/solutions/trends/iot/docs/computing-overview.pdf (accessed on 5 August 2018).
  23. Fog vs. Edge Computing: What’s the Difference? Available online: https://info.opto22.com/fog-vs-edge-computing (accessed on 15 August 2018).
  24. Yi, S.; Qin, Z.; Li, Q. Security and Privacy Issues of Fog Computing: A Survey. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Proceedings of the International Conference on Wireless Algorithms, Systems, and Applications, Qufu, China, 10–12 August 2015; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 685–695. [Google Scholar]
  25. Stojmenovic, I.; Wen, S. The fog computing paradigm: Scenarios and security issues. In Proceedings of the 2014 Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems, Warsaw, Poland, 7–10 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  26. Shi, W.; Dustdar, S. The Promise of Edge Computing. Computer 2016, 49, 78–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shi, W.; Cao, J.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Xu, L. Edge COMPUTING: Vision and Challenges. IEEE Internet Things J. 2016, 3, 637–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chen, M. Machine-to-Machine Communications: Architectures, Standards and Applications. KSII Trans. Internet Inf. Syst. 2012, 6, 480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Darbee, P. INSTEON: Compare. White Pap. 2006, 2, 69. [Google Scholar]
  30. ZigBee. Available online: http://www.zigbee.org/ (accessed on 8 December 2015).
  31. Z-Wave Alliance. Available online: http://products.z-wavealliance.org/ (accessed on 8 December 2015).
  32. Ding, D.; Cooper, R.A.; Pasquina, P.F.; Fici-Pasquina, L. Sensor technology for smart homes. Maturitas 2011, 69, 131–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Debes, C.; Merentitis, A.; Sukhanov, S.; Niessen, M.; Frangiadakis, N.; Bauer, A. Monitoring Activities of Daily Living in Smart Homes: Understanding human behavior. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 2016, 33, 81–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Patel, S.; Park, H.; Bonato, P.; Chan, L.; Rodgers, M. A review of wearable sensors and systems with application in rehabilitation. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2012, 9, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Atallah, L.; Lo, B.; Ali, R.; King, R.; Yang, G.Z. Real-Time Activity Classification Using Ambient and Wearable Sensors. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2009, 13, 1031–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Huỳnh, T.; Blanke, U.; Schiele, B. Scalable recognition of daily activities with wearable sensors. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Location- and Context-Awareness, Oberpfaffenhofen, Germany, 20–21 September 2007; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; pp. 50–67. [Google Scholar]
  37. Yang, J.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y. Using acceleration measurements for activity recognition: An effective learning algorithm for constructing neural classifiers. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 2008, 29, 2213–2220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Khan, A.M.; Lee, Y.K.; Lee, S.Y. Accelerometer’s position free human activity recognition using a hierarchical recognition model. In Proceedings of the 12th IEEE International Conference on E-Health Networking, Applications and Services, Lyon, France, 1–3 July 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gjoreski, H.; Lustrek, M.; Gams, M. Accelerometer placement for posture recognition and fall detection. In Proceedings of the 2011 Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Environments, Nottingham, UK, 25–28 July 2011. [Google Scholar]
  40. Mathie, M.J.; Coster, A.C.F.; Lovell, N.H.; Celler, B.G.; Lord, S.R.; Tiedemann, A. A pilot study of long-term monitoring of human movements in the home using accelerometry. J. Telemed. Telecare 2004, 10, 144–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Li, Q.; Stankovic, J.A.; Hanson, M.A.; Barth, A.T.; Lach, J.; Zhou, G. Accurate, fast fall detection using gyroscopes and accelerometer-derived posture information. In Proceedings of the 2009 Sixth International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks, Berkeley, CA, USA, 3–5 June 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Amstutz, R.; Amft, O.; French, B.; Smailagic, A.; Siewiorek, D.; Troster, G. Performance analysis of an HMM-based gesture recognition using a wristwatch device. In Proceedings of the 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 29–31 August 2009. [Google Scholar]
  43. Merilahti, J.; Pärkkä, J.; Antila, K.; Paavilainen, P.; Mattila, E.; Malm, E.J.; Saarinen, A.; Korhonen, I. Compliance and technical feasibility of long-term health monitoring with wearable and ambient technologies. J. Telemed. Telecare 2009, 15, 302–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Van Laerhoven, K.; Kilian, D.; Schiele, B. Using rhythm awareness in long-term activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2008 12th IEEE International Symposium on Wearable Computers, Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 28 September–1 October 2008; pp. 63–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Maekawa, T.; Kishino, Y.; Sakurai, Y.; Suyama, T. Activity recognition with hand-worn magnetic sensors. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 2013, 17, 1085–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Doughty, K.; Costa, J. Continuous automated telecare assessment of the elderly. J. Telemed. Telecare 1997, 3 (Suppl. S1), 23–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kwapisz, J.; Weiss, G.; Moore, S. Activity recognition using cell phone accelerometers. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 2011, 12, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lester, J.; Choudhury, T. A practical approach to recognizing physical activities. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Dublin, Ireland, 7–10 May 2006; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 1–16. [Google Scholar]
  49. Park, S.; Kautz, H. Hierarchical recognition of activities of daily living using multi-scale, multi-perspective vision and RFID. In Proceedings of the 2008 IET 4th International conference on intelligent environments, Seattle, WA, USA, 21–22 July 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Stikic, M.; Huynh, T.; Van Laerhoven, K.; Schiele, B. ADL recognition based on the combination of RFID and accelerometer sensing. In Proceedings of the 2008 Second International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, Ampere, Finland, 30 January–1 February 2008. [Google Scholar]
  51. Buettner, M.; Prasad, R.; Philipose, M.; Wetherall, D. Recognizing daily activities with RFID-based sensors. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Orlando, FL, USA, 30 September–3 October 2009. [Google Scholar]
  52. Philipose, M.; Fishkin, K.P.; Perkowitz, M.; Patterson, D.J.; Fox, D.; Kautz, H.; Hahnel, D. Inferring activities from interactions with objects. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2004, 3, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Scott, J.; Brush, A.J.; Krumm, J.; Meyers, B.; Hazas, M.; Hodges, S.; Villar, N. PreHeat: Controlling home heating using occupancy prediction. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Beijing, China, 17–21 September 2011. [Google Scholar]
  54. Matic, A.; Mehta, P.; Rehg, J.M.; Osmani, V.; Mayora, O. Monitoring Dressing Activity Failures through RFID and Video. Methods Inf. Med. 2012, 51, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Chan, M.; Campo, E.; Estève, D. Assessment of activity of elderly people using a home monitoring system. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 2005, 28, 69–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Suzuki, R.; Otake, S.; Izutsu, T.; Yoshida, M.; Iwaya, T. Rhythm of daily living and detection of a typical days for elderly people living alone as determined with a monitoring system. J. Telemed. Telecare 2006, 12, 208–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Alwan, M.; Dalal, S.; Mack, D.; Kell, S.; Turner, B.; Leachtenauer, J.; Felder, R. Impact of monitoring technology in assisted living: Outcome pilot. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2006, 10, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Tyrer, H.W.; Aud, M.A.; Alexander, G.; Skubic, M.; Rantz, M. Early detection of health changes in older adults. In Proceedings of the 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Lyon, France, 22–26 August 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Virone, G.; Alwan, M.; Dalal, S.; Kell, S.W.; Turner, B.; Stankovic, J.A.; Felder, R. Behavioral Patterns of Older Adults in Assisted Living. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2008, 12, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Van Kasteren, T.; Noulas, A.; Englebienne, G.; Kröse, B. Accurate activity recognition in a home setting. In Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Ubiquitous Computing, Seoul, Korea, 21–24 September 2008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Skubic, M.; Alexander, G.; Popescu, M.; Rantz, M.; Keller, J. A smart home application to elder care: Current status and lessons learned. Technol. Health Care 2009, 17, 183–201. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  62. Biswas, J.; Kumar, S.D.; Qui, Q.; Saradhi, V.C.; Pham, V.T. Quality aware elderly people monitoring using ultrasonic sensors. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics (ICOST), Magog, QC, Canada, 4–6 July 2005; pp. 107–115. [Google Scholar]
  63. Fleury, A.; Vacher, M.; Noury, N. SVM-Based Multimodal Classification of Activities of Daily Living in Health Smart Homes: Sensors, Algorithms, and First Experimental Results. IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2009, 14, 274–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Vuegen, L.; Den Broeck, B.; Karsmakers, P.; Hamme, H.; Vanrumste, B. Automatic monitoring of activities of daily living based on real-life acoustic sensor data: A preliminary study. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Speech and Language Processing for Assistive Technologies (SLPAT): Proceedings, Grenoble, France, 21–22 August 2013. [Google Scholar]
  65. Biswas, J.; Naumann, F.; Qiu, Q. Assessing the completeness of sensor data. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Proceedings of the International Conference on Database Systems for Advanced Applications, Singapore, 12–15 April 2006; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 717–732. [Google Scholar]
  66. Pham, V.T.; Qiu, Q.; Wai, A.A.P.; Biswas, J. Application of ultrasonic sensors in a smart environment. Pervasive Mob. Comput. 2007, 3, 180–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Haigh, K.Z.; Kiff, L.M.; Ho, G. The Independent Lifestyle Assistant: Lessons Learned. Assist. Technol. 2006, 18, 87–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Cameron, K.; Hughes, K.; Doughty, K. Reducing fall incidence in community elders by telecare using predictive systems. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. ‘Magnificent Milestones and Emerging Opportunities in Medical Engineering’ (Cat. no. 97 CH36136), Chicago, IL, USA, 30 October–2 November 1997. [Google Scholar]
  69. Tapia, E.M.; Intille, S.S.; Larson, K. Activity recognition in the home using simple and ubiquitous sensors. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Proceedings of the International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Linz/Vienna, Austria, 21–23 April 2004; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  70. Han, J.; Bhanu, B. Human activity recognition in thermal infrared imagery. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR’05)-Workshops, San Diego, CA, USA, 21–23 September 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hevesi, P.; Wille, S.; Pirkl, G.; When, N.; Lukowicz, P. Monitoring household activities and user location with a cheap, unobtrusive thermal sensor array. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, Seattle, WA, USA, 13–17 September 2014. [Google Scholar]
  72. Zigel, Y.; Litvak, D.; Gannot, I. A Method for Automatic Fall Detection of Elderly People Using Floor Vibrations and Sound-Proof of Concept on Human Mimicking Doll Falls. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 2009, 56, 2858–2867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Intille, S.S.; Larson, K.; Beaudin, J.S.; Nawyn, J.; Munguia Tapia, E.; Kaushik, P. A living laboratory for the design and evaluation of ubiquitous computing technologies. In Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems: CHI’05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Portland, OR, USA, 2–7 April 2005. [Google Scholar]
  74. Tsukiyama, T. Ambient sensor system for in-home health monitoring. In Proceedings of the 4th Int. Conf. Ambient Computing, Applications, Services and Technologies, Rome, Italy, 24–28 August 2014; pp. 47–50. [Google Scholar]
  75. Hu, L.; Chen, Y.; Wang, S.; Jia, L. A nonintrusive and single-point infrastructure-mediated sensing approach for water-use activity recognition. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 10th International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications and 2013 IEEE International Conference on Embedded and Ubiquitous Computing, Zhangjiajie, China, 13–15 November 2013. [Google Scholar]
  76. Lim, J.; Jang, H.; Jang, J.; Park, S.J. Daily activity recognition system for the elderly using pressure sensors. In Proceedings of the 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 20–25 August 2008. [Google Scholar]
  77. Fleury, A.; Noury, N.; Vacher, M.; Glasson, H.; Seri, J.F. Sound and speech detection and classification in a Health Smart Home. In Proceedings of the 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 20–25 August 2008. [Google Scholar]
  78. Popescu, M.; Li, Y.; Skubic, M.; Rantz, M. An acoustic fall detector system that uses sound height information to reduce the false alarm rate. In Proceedings of the 2008 30th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 20–25 August 2008. [Google Scholar]
  79. Hunt, T.D.; Rajendran, D.; Nikora, M.; Bennett, S.; Fendall, A. A minimally intrusive monitoring system that utilizes electricity consumption as a proxy for wellbeing. J. Appl. Comput. Inf. Technol. 2014, 18, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  80. Franco, G.C.; Gallay, F.; Berenguer, M.; Mourrain, C.; Couturier, P. Noninvasive monitoring of the activities of daily living of elderly people at home—A pilot study of the usage of domestic appliances. J. Telemed. Telecare 2008, 14, 231–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Ping, T.Y.; Fei, D.; Ying, X.J. The investigation of the elder’s monitoring system based on life supplying line. In Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology, Hong Kong, China, 14–17 December 2005. [Google Scholar]
  82. Chen, L.; Hoey, J.; Nugent, C.D.; Cook, D.J.; Yu, Z. Sensor-Based Activity Recognition. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C 2012, 42, 790–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hu, D.H.; Yang, Q. CIGAR: Concurrent and interleaving goal and activity recognition. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Third AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (2008), Chicago, IL, USA, 13–17 July 2008. [Google Scholar]
  84. Xing, Z.; Pei, J.; Keogh, E. A brief survey on sequence classification. ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 2010, 12, 40–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Dong, G.; Pei, J. Sequence Data Mining; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2007; ISBN 978-0-387-69936-3. [Google Scholar]
  86. Saigo, H.; Vert, J.; Ueda, N.; Akutsu, T. Protein homology detection using string alignment kernels. Bioinformatics 2004, 20, 1682–1689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Yakhnenko, O.; Silvescu, A.; Honavar, V. Discriminatively trained markov model for sequence classification. In Proceedings of the Fifth IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM’05), Houston, TX, USA, 27–30 November 2005. [Google Scholar]
  88. Novák, M.; Biňas, M.; Jakab, F. Unobtrusive anomaly detection in presence of elderly in a smart-home environment. In Proceedings of the 2012 Elektro, Rajeck Teplice, Slovakia, 21–22 May 2012. [Google Scholar]
  89. Cook, D.J. Making Sense of Sensor Data. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 2007, 6, 105–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Heierman, E.O.; Cook, D.J. Improving home automation by discovering regularly occurring device usage patterns. In Proceedings of the Third IEEE International Conference on Data Mining, Melbourne, FL, USA, 22–22 November 2003. [Google Scholar]
  91. Levermore, G.J. Building Energy Management Systems: Applications to Low-Energy HVAC and Natural Ventilation Control, 2nd ed.; Routledge: London, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Sissine, F. Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007: A Summary of Major Provisions. Congressional Research Service Report for Congress, Order Code RL34294, Washington, DC, USA. Available online: https://www1.eere.energy.gov/manufacturing/tech_assistance/pdfs/crs_report_energy_act_2007.pdf (accessed on 25 December 2007).
  93. Li, X.H.; Hong, S.H. User-expected price-based demand response algorithm for a home-to-grid system. Energy 2014, 64, 437–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhou, B.; Li, W.; Chan, K.W.; Cao, Y.; Kuang, Y.; Liu, X.; Wang, X. Smart home energy management systems: Concept, configurations, and scheduling strategies. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 61, 30–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Singh, R.; Vyakaranam, B.G. Evaluation of Representative Smart Grid Investment Grant Project Technologies: Distributed Generation; Pacific Northwest National Lab. (PNNL): Richland, WA, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  96. Erol-Kantarci, M.; Mouftah, H.T. Wireless Sensor Networks for Cost-Efficient Residential Energy Management in the Smart Grid. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2011, 2, 314–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Pedrasa, M.A.A.; Spooner, T.D.; MacGill, I.F. Coordinated Scheduling of Residential Distributed Energy Resources to Optimize Smart Home Energy Services. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2010, 1, 134–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Kailas, A.; Cecchi, V.; Mukherjee, A. A Survey of Communications and Networking Technologies for Energy Management in Buildings and Home Automation. J. Comput. Netw. Commun. 2012, 2012, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  99. Erol-Kantarci, M.; Mouftah, H.T. Wireless sensor networks for domestic energy management in smart grids. In Proceedings of the 2010 25th Biennial Symposium on Communications, Kingston, ON, Canada, 12–14 May 2010. [Google Scholar]
  100. Javaid, N.; Khan, I.; Ullah, M.N.; Mahmood, A.; Farooq, M.U. A survey of home energy management systems in future smart grid communications. In Proceedings of the 2013 Eighth International Conference on Broadband and Wireless Computing, Communication and Applications, Compiegne, France, 28–30 October 2013. [Google Scholar]
  101. Nguyen, T.A.; Aiello, M. Energy intelligent buildings based on user activity: A survey. Energy Build. 2013, 56, 244–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Guo, X.; Tiller, D.K.; Henze, G.P.; Waters, C.E. The performance of occupancy-based lighting control systems: A review. Light Res. Technol. 2010, 42, 415–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kleiminger, W.; Mattern, F.; Santini, S. Predicting household occupancy for smart heating control: A comparative performance analysis of state-of-the-art approaches. Energy Build. 2014, 85, 493–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Mozer, M.C.; Vidmar, L.; Dodier, R.H. The Neurothermostat: Predictive optimal control of residential heating systems. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, Denver, CO, USA, 3–5 December 1996; pp. 953–959. [Google Scholar]
  105. Gupta, A.G.; Intille, S.S.; Larson, K. Adding GPS-control to traditional thermostats: An exploration of potential energy savings and design challenges. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Nara, Japan, 11–14 May 2009. [Google Scholar]
  106. Lu, J.; Sookoor, T.; Srinivasan, V.; Gao, G.; Holben, B.; Stankovic, J.; Field, E.; Whitehouse, K. The smart thermostat: Using occupancy sensors to save energy in homes. In Proceedings of the 8 th ACM Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, Zürich, Switzerland, 3–5 November 2010. [Google Scholar]
  107. Available online: www.ecobee.com/solutions/home/smart-si/ (accessed on 5 November 2015).
  108. Agarwal, Y.; Balaji, B.; Dutta, S.; Gupta, R.K.; Weng, T. Duty-cycling buildings aggressively: The next frontier in HVAC control. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, Chicago, IL, USA, 12–14 April 2011. [Google Scholar]
  109. Oldewurtel, F.; Parisio, A.; Jones, C.N.; Morari, M.; Gyalistras, D.; Gwerder, M.; Stauch, V.; Lehmann, B.; Wirth, K. Energy efficient building climate control using Stochastic Model Predictive Control and weather predictions. In Proceedings of the 2010 American Control Conference, Baltimore, MD, USA, 30 June–2 July 2010. [Google Scholar]
  110. Ellis, C.; Scott, J.; Hazas, M.; Krumm, J. Earlyoff: Using house cooling rates to save energy. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Workshop on Embedded Sensing Systems for Energy-Efficiency in Buildings, Toronto, ON, Canada, 6 November 2012. [Google Scholar]
  111. Erickson, V.L.; Carreira-Perpiñán, M.Á.; Cerpa, A.E. OBSERVE: Occupancy-based system for efficient reduction of HVAC energy. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, Chicago, IL, USA, 12–14 April 2011; pp. 258–269. [Google Scholar]
  112. Fountain, M.; Brager, G.; Arens, E.; Bauman, F.; Benton, C. Comport control for short-term occupancy. Energy Build. 1994, 21, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Harish, V.S.K.V.; Kumar, A. Techniques used to construct an energy model for attaining energy efficiency in building: A review. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Conference on Control, Instrumentation, Energy and Communication (CIEC), Calcutta, India, 31 January–2 February 2014; pp. 366–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Beck, J.V.; Arnold, K.J. Parameter Estimation in Engineering and Science; John Wiley & Sons: New York, NY, USA, 1977; ISBN 9780471061182. [Google Scholar]
  115. Harish, V.S.K.V.; Kumar, A. A review on modeling and simulation of building energy systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 56, 1272–1292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Rabl, A.; Rialhe, A. Energy signature models for commercial buildings: Test with measured data and interpretation. Energy Build. 1992, 19, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Rabl, A. Parameter Estimation in Buildings: Methods for Dynamic Analysis of Measured Energy Use. J. Solar Energy Eng. 1988, 110, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Braun, J.E. Reducing energy costs and peak electrical demand through optimal control of building thermal storage. ASHRAE Trans. 1990, 96, 876–888. [Google Scholar]
  119. Dhar, A.; Reddy, T.A.; Claridge, D.E. Modeling Hourly Energy Use in Commercial Buildings with Fourier Series Functional Forms. J. Solar Energy Eng. 1998, 120, 217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Dhar, A.; Reddy, T.A.; Claridge, D.E. A Fourier Series Model to Predict Hourly Heating and Cooling Energy Use in Commercial Buildings with Outdoor Temperature as the Only Weather Variable. J. Solar Energy Eng. 1999, 121, 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Andresen, I.; Brandemuehl, M.J. Heat storage in building thermal mass: A parametric study. ASHRAE Trans. 1992, 98, 910–918. [Google Scholar]
  122. Gordon, J.M.; Ng, K.C. Predictive and diagnostic aspects of a universal thermodynamic model for chillers. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 1995, 38, 807–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Gordon, J.M.; Ng, K.C. Cool Thermodynamics; Cambridge Press: Cambridge, UK, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  124. Guyon, G.; Palomo, E. Validation of two French building energy programs, part 2: Parameter estimation method applied to empirical validation. ASHRAE Trans. 1999, 105, 709. [Google Scholar]
  125. Guyon, G.; Palomo, E. Validation of two French building energy programs, part 1: Analytical verification. ASHRAE Trans. 1999, 105, 694. [Google Scholar]
  126. Hammarsten, S. Estimation of Energy Balances for Houses; National Swedish Institute for Building Research: Gavle, Sweden, 1984. [Google Scholar]
  127. Hammarsten, S. A critical appraisal of energy-signature models. Appl. Energy 1987, 26, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Sonderegger, R.C. Thermal modeling of buildings as a design tool. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Heating, Ventilating and Air Conditioning CLIMA 2000, Copenhagen, Denmark, 8–11 September 1985. [Google Scholar]
  129. Sonderegger, R.C. A baseline model for utility bill analysis using both weather and non-weather-related variables. ASHRAE Trans. 1998, 104, 859. [Google Scholar]
  130. Coppola, R.; Morisio, M. Connected Car. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR) 2016, 49, 1–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hong, J.; Shin, J.; Lee, D. Strategic management of next-generation connected life: Focusing on smart key and car–home connectivity. Technol. Forecast. Social Chang. 2016, 103, 11–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Digital Trends. Ford Demonstrates Smart Home Integration at CES 2016. January 2016. Available online: http://www.digitaltrends.com/cars/ford-wants-future-cars-and-smart-homes-to-get-along/ (accessed on 8 August 2018).
  133. The Verge. Ford Wants to Integrate Your Smart Home and Your Smart Car. January 2016. Available online: http://www.theverge.com/2016/1/5/10711914/ford-smart-home-connectivity/ (accessed on 5 August 2018).
  134. Quddus, M.; Ochieng, W.; Zhao, L.; Noland, R. A general map matching algorithm for transport telematics applications. GPS Solut. 2003, 7, 157–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Duri, S.; Gruteser, M.; Liu, X.; Moskowitz, P.; Perez, R.; Singh, M.; Tang, J.M. Framework for security and privacy in automotive telematics. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Mobile Commerce, Atlanta, GA, USA, 28 September 2002; pp. 25–32. [Google Scholar]
  136. Godoy, J.; Milanés, V.; Pérez, J.; Villagrá, J.; Onieva, E. An auxiliary V2I network for road transport and dynamic environments. Transp. Res. Part C 2013, 37, 145–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Rasin, V.; McNamara, D.; Simonds, C.; Perry, F.; Streelman, G. The new wireless frontier: Home and vehicle connectivity. SAE Technical Pap. 2004, 21, 68. [Google Scholar]
  138. Liu, C.; Chau, K.T.; Wu, D.; Gao, S. Opportunities and Challenges of Vehicle-to-Home, Vehicle-to-Vehicle, and Vehicle-to-Grid Technologies. J. Proc. 2013, 101, 2409–2427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Berthold, F.; Blunier, B.; Bouquain, D.; Williamson, S.; Miraoui, A. PHEV control strategy including vehicle to home (V2H) and home to vehicle (H2V) functionalities. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference, Chicago, IL, USA, 6–9 September 2011. [Google Scholar]
  140. Tuttle, D.P.; Fares, R.L.; Baldick, R.; Webber, M.E. Plug-In Vehicle to Home (V2H) duration and power output capability. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference and Expo (ITEC), Detroit, MI, USA, 16–19 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
  141. Anonymous. MindBranch: “Commercial Opportunities from an Aging Population: Epidemiology, Market and Pipeline Analysis Across Seven Major Indications” by Business Insights; M2 Presswire: Coventry, UK, 2007; p. 1. Available online: https://search.proquest.com/docview/444743213 (accessed on 5 June 2015).
  142. Yamazaki, T. Beyond the smart home. In Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Hybrid Information Technology, Cheju Island, South Korea, 9–11 November 2006. [Google Scholar]
  143. Dishman, E. Inventing wellness systems for aging in place. Computer 2004, 5, 34–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Chan, M.; Campo, E.; Estève, D.; Fourniols, J.-Y. Smart homes—Current features and future perspectives. Maturita 2009, 64, 90–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Lamothe, L.; Fortin, J.P.; Labbé, F.; Gagnon, M.P.; Messikh, D. Impacts of Telehomecare on Patients, Providers, and Organizations. Telemed. J. E Health Off. J. Am. Telemed. Assoc. 2006, 12, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Ram, F.S.F.; Wedzicha, J.A.; Wright, J.; Greenstone, M. Hospital at home for patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: Systematic review of evidence. BMJ 2004, 329, 315–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Helal, S.; Mann, W.; El-Zabadani, H.; King, J.; Kaddoura, Y.; Jansen, E. The Gator Tech Smart House: A programmable pervasive space. Computer 2005, 38, 50–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. General cloud-base architecture of a smart home [3].
Figure 1. General cloud-base architecture of a smart home [3].
Applsci 09 03459 g001
Figure 2. The richness of the sensors versus privacy concern [33].
Figure 2. The richness of the sensors versus privacy concern [33].
Applsci 09 03459 g002
Figure 3. Structure of a building energy system [115].
Figure 3. Structure of a building energy system [115].
Applsci 09 03459 g003
Table 1. Wired communication protocols.
Table 1. Wired communication protocols.
ProtocolsFrequencyData RateRangeNetwork TopologyEncryption
Ethernet 100–500 MHz1 Mbps–100 Gbps100 mBus, StarNone
X10120 kHz; 310–433.92 MHz20–60 bps; 9.6 kbps500–1000 mNone; StarNone
UPB4–40 kHz480 bps80–500 mP2PNone
INSTEON131.65; 868–924 MHz13.165 kbps; 38.4 kbps500–40 mP2P, mesh, dual meshAES-256
MoCA0.5–1.5 GHz175 Mbps–2.5 Gbps90 mP2P, meshDES-56, AES-128
KNX110/132 kHz; 868.3 MHz1.2/2.4 Mbps1000 m; 100 mTree, line starNone; AES-128
Table 2. Wireless communication protocols.
Table 2. Wireless communication protocols.
ProtocolsFrequencyData RateRangeNetwork SizeNetwork TopologyEncryption
Wi-Fi 802.11n2.4–5.8 GHz450 Mbps10–100 mThousandsStar, tree, P2P, meshNone
Bluetooth2.402–2.48 GHz 0.7–2.1 Mbps15–20 m8StarNone
BLE2.402–2.48 GHz2 Mbps10–15 mN/AStarNone
ZigBee868/915 MHz, 2.4 GHz20/40 kbps, 250 kbps10–100 m65,536Star, mesh, cluster-treeAES-256
Z-Wave868/915 MHz10–100 kbps30–50 m232MeshDES-56, AES-128
6LowPAN868/921 MHz, 2.4–5 GHz10–40 kbps, 250 kbps10–100 m250Star, mesh, P2PNone; AES-128
Table 3. Comparison of wired and wireless communication protocols.
Table 3. Comparison of wired and wireless communication protocols.
AdvantagesDisadvantages
Wired communication
protocols
High security
Ease of use
Long distance coverage
High bit rate
High Reliability
High OPEX
No mobility
No backup power source
High expansion cost
Wireless communication
protocols
Low OPEX
Mobility
Ease of expansionFlexibility
Security risk
sLow bit rate
Interference
Coverage limitation at presence of obstacles
Table 4. Wearable sensors used for activity classification.
Table 4. Wearable sensors used for activity classification.
SensorDetected ParameterUsage Example
AccelerometerMovementOccupant running and falling
Hand-worn sensorsGestures and step counterDrinking, walking
SmartphoneMovementUser sleep or activity duration
RFIDObject-interactionUsing utensils
Vital monitoring sensorsVital signsBlood pressure, heart bit rate
Table 5. Nonwearable sensors used for activity classification.
Table 5. Nonwearable sensors used for activity classification.
SensorDetected ParameterUsage Example
Passive/Active IRMotionOccupant presence detection
UltrasonicMotionOccupant presence detection
PhotoelectricMotionOccupant presence detection
Video/ThermalActivityOccupant presence detection
VibrationVibrationOccupant presence detection
PressurePressureFall detection
Magnetic switchesDoor opening/ClosingCupboard opening
RFIDObject-interactionWatching TV
AudioActivityShowering
WattmeterUsage informationElectric kettle usage

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lashkari, B.; Chen, Y.; Musilek, P. Energy Management for Smart Homes—State of the Art. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3459. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173459

AMA Style

Lashkari B, Chen Y, Musilek P. Energy Management for Smart Homes—State of the Art. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(17):3459. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173459

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lashkari, Behzad, Yuxiang Chen, and Petr Musilek. 2019. "Energy Management for Smart Homes—State of the Art" Applied Sciences 9, no. 17: 3459. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9173459

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop