Next Article in Journal
Adaptive Fuzzy-Based Fault-Tolerant Control of a Continuum Robotic System for Maxillary Sinus Surgery
Next Article in Special Issue
Graphene Quantum Dots Doped PVDF(TBT)/PVP(TBT) Fiber Film with Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance
Previous Article in Journal
High-Speed VCSEL-Based Transceiver for 200 GbE Short-Reach Intra-Datacenter Optical Interconnects
Previous Article in Special Issue
Photocatalytic Lithography
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances and Applications of Semiconductor Photocatalytic Technology

1
College of Physics Science, Qingdao University, Qingdao 266071, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Marine Coatings, Marine Chemical Research Institute Co., Ltd., Qingdao 266071, China
3
Department of Chemistry, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA
4
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, 4 Engineering Drive 4, Singapore 117585, Singapore
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(12), 2489; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122489
Submission received: 25 April 2019 / Revised: 10 June 2019 / Accepted: 12 June 2019 / Published: 18 June 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Semiconductor Photocatalysis)

Abstract

:
Along with the development of industry and the improvement of people’s living standards, peoples’ demand on resources has greatly increased, causing energy crises and environmental pollution. In recent years, photocatalytic technology has shown great potential as a low-cost, environmentally-friendly, and sustainable technology, and it has become a hot research topic. However, current photocatalytic technology cannot meet industrial requirements. The biggest challenge in the industrialization of photocatalyst technology is the development of an ideal photocatalyst, which should possess four features, including a high photocatalytic efficiency, a large specific surface area, a full utilization of sunlight, and recyclability. In this review, starting from the photocatalytic reaction mechanism and the preparation of the photocatalyst, we review the classification of current photocatalysts and the methods for improving photocatalytic performance; we also further discuss the potential industrial usage of photocatalytic technology. This review also aims to provide basic and comprehensive information on the industrialization of photocatalysis technology.

1. Introduction

As industrialization accelerates, both energy and environmental issues arise. Nowadays, the world’s major energy sources are still fossil energies, such as coal, oil, and natural gas. With the continuous development of industrialization, most fossil fuels are expected to be depleted in 21st century. In addition, the use of fossil energy also causes severe pollution to the environment. In recent years, more and more serious air pollution and water pollution directly threaten human life and health [1]. In 1972, Fujishima and Honda found that the TiO2 electrode can break down hydrogen in aquatic production under sunlight [2]. Since then, photocatalysis has attracted intense attention due to its direct conversion of solar energy to easily stored hydrogen, as well as its lack of environmental pollution. Frank and Bard then successfully oxidized CN to OCN using TiO2 as a photocatalyst, an act which promoted and accelerated the application of photocatalysts in wastewater treatment [3]. Since then, TiO2 has been used as a photocatalyst for a wide range of applications in the field of environmental management. The detailed research of photocatalyst technology also extends the potential application range of photocatalysts. The main research directions at this stage are photocatalyst disinfection [4,5,6], photocatalytic hydrogen production [7,8,9,10,11], photocatalytic reduction of CO2 [12,13,14,15], photocatalyst wastewater treatment [16,17,18,19,20], and air purification [21,22,23]. However, photocatalytic technology is only at the laboratory stage, and there is still a long journey to apply this technology in practice [24].
With the continuous development of photocatalytic technology, researchers have published many excellent reviews. For example, Wang et al. [25] reviewed the use of nitrogen doping to modify oxide photocatalysts to improve their photocatalytic performance. Li et al. [26] outlined the application of graphene and its composites to photocatalysts. Zhou et al. [27] gave an overview of the all-solid Z-Scheme photocatalyst system, including the configuration, structure, optimization, and application of a Z-scheme photocatalyst system. Boyjoo et al. [24] presented the application of photocatalysts in air treatment, including catalyst development and reactor design. Wang et al. [28] gave the latest developments and challenges in photocatalytic sterilization. Most of the current reviews focus on only one or several aspects of photocatalysts. A complete summary of the main content of photocatalysts is still missing.
In anticipation of helping researchers with information on more efficient photocatalysts, we have summarized some common preparation and modification methods of photocatalysts. Meanwhile, a series of advances in photocatalyst technology have been reviewed to facilitate researchers’ understanding of the latest research trends in photocatalysts. This review article aims to summarize researchers’ efforts on the use of various preparation and modification methods to prepare ideal photocatalysts. In addition, this review also promotes the development of photocatalytic technology and even the industrialization of photocatalytic technology.

2. Photocatalytic Mechanism and Influencing Factors

2.1. Reaction Mechanism

Photocatalytic reaction is a chemical reaction that takes place under the joint action of light and the photocatalyst. This technology possesses several advantages, including environmental protection, the complete degradation of pollutants, and no secondary pollution. Figure 1 shows the basic principle of a photocatalytic reaction [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40].
From the point of semiconductor photochemistry, photocatalytic action is the light-induced redox reaction of semiconductors. A semiconductor has an energy band structure composed of a low energy valence band (VB) and a high energy conduction band (CB), and the band gap between a conduction band and a valence band is called a forbidden band. When the energy of the incident light is larger than the band gap of the semiconductor, the electrons in the VB of the semiconductor are excited to the CB by photons, and the corresponding holes are generated in the VB. Photogenerated electrons and holes are separated by an electric field and move to the surface of semiconductor particles. The photogenerated pores have strong oxidizing properties and can oxidize substances adsorbed on the surface or solution of the semiconductor.
The detailed process of a photocatalytic reaction is as follows. Under a certain energy of light, electrons on a VB are excited and jump to a CB, and the holes stay on the VB. The electrons on the CB move to the surface of the catalyst and participate in a reduction reaction, and the holes on the VB diffuse to the photocatalyst surface and are involved in an oxidation reaction. In the course of the reaction, the electrons can form H2O2 or a superoxide radical O2 with H+ and dissolved O2 in the aqueous solution, and the holes can oxidize OH to produce hydroxyl radicals ·OH and, thus, achieve the effect of degrading pollutants [41,42,43,44].

2.2. Influencing Factors

The photocatalytic reaction process is complicated and has many intermediate stages. Therefore, many factors can influence the photocatalytic reaction [45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55]. The characteristics of the catalyst itself; the surface condition of the catalyst (charge, adsorbed material, defect, composition); the reaction medium conditions (pH, solvent); the type and concentration of reactants, adsorption, and product analysis of reactants; oxygen concentration; light source (wavelength, intensity, distance)—all of these are key factors that affect the photocatalytic reaction. The influence of several factors on the photocatalytic reaction is summarized in Table 1.

3. Common Classification of Photocatalysts

3.1. Oxide Photocatalyst

3.1.1. TiO2-Based Photocatalyst

In 1976, Carey et al. discovered that nano-TiO2 could dechlorinate polychlorinated biphenyls, a hard-degradable organic compound, under ultraviolet irradiation [18,56,57,58,59,60,61], and opened a new chapter in photocatalytic degradation of semiconductor nanomaterials. In 1980, Bard et al. proposed a photocatalytic mechanism using TiO2 as a catalyst [62], which promoted the development of TiO2 in the field of photocatalysis.
TiO2 has three crystal forms—rutile, brookite, and anatase. Among these three crystal structures, anatase and rutile-type TiO2 are often used as photocatalysts [63]. TiO2-based photocatalysts have been widely used in air purification, water pollutants degradation, antibacterial disinfection, deodorant, and antifog, among other applications, due to their high activity, stable properties, low cost, and non-toxic environment.
TiO2 has a wide band gap (about 3.2 eV). Therefore, TiO2 can only absorb ultraviolet light when used as a photocatalyst. However, ultraviolet radiation occupies only 5% of sunlight, which greatly limits the application of TiO2 in the visible range. A series of modifications to TiO2 is usually carried out, thereby improving the utilization of visible light by TiO2 and reducing the photogenerated electron-hole recombination rate on the surface of TiO2. In the end, its photocatalytic efficiency can be improved. As shown in Figure 2, common methods used to improve photocatalytic efficiency include semiconductor surface photosensitization, semiconductor surface noble metal deposition, metal/nonmetal doping, and complex semiconductor modification.

3.1.2. Bi2O3-Based Photocatalyst

Bi-based oxides are an important class of functional materials that are widely used in many fields [64]. For example, they are used as electronic ceramic materials (zinc oxide varistors, ceramic capacitors, ferrite magnetic materials), electrolyte materials, high-temperature superconducting materials, and materials for photoelectric conversion. Among them, Bi2O3 possesses its own unique properties, such as a high electrical conductivity, low energy bandgap (about 2.8 eV), and low energy band structure, which means that Bi2O3 can absorb visible light in the solar spectrum. Therefore, Bi2O3 has great potential for photocatalysis application [65,66].
The semiconductor Bi2O3 mainly has four crystal forms, including α, β, γ, and δ. The band gaps of β-Bi2O3 and α-Bi2O3 are 2.58 eV and 2.85 eV, respectively, which can absorb visible light with wavelengths exceeding 400 nm [65]. α-Bi2O3 is the most widely used among these four different Bi2O3 semiconductors in photocatalytic reactions, since α-Bi2O3 is the most thermodynamically stable among these four crystal structures [67].
The development of Bi-based semiconductor materials obviously solves the problem of the visible light absorption of TiO2. However, a low quantum efficiency and photogenerated carrier recombination is still an urgent problem that needs to be solved for the Bi-based photocatalysts. The doping modification of the photocatalyst is an effective method for improving its photocatalytic performance. Commonly used modification methods include semiconductor surface photosensitization, semiconductor surface noble metal deposition, metal/nonmetal doping, and complex semiconductor modification. To date, Bi-based photocatalysts have achieved a variety of important research results in the applications of atmospheric purification, organic wastewater treatment, heavy metal ion removal, and sterilization [68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84].

3.1.3. Other Oxide Photocatalysts

Transition metal elements of the IV cycle, such as titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and zinc [85,86,87,88], as well as their corresponding oxides, have excellent physical and chemical properties. These excellent physicochemical properties include a high redox potential, multivalence, chemical resistance, and a high temperature resistance. The storage of transition metal elements is relatively abundant and has a low price, which means that transition metal oxides have good application prospects in photocatalysis.
Next, we will introduce the three kinds of transition metal oxides generally used, ZnO, WO3, and Fe2O3.
ZnO is one of the few oxide semiconductor materials that can achieve a quantum size effect, and ZnO has good UV absorption and piezoelectric properties. The forbidden band width of ZnO is 3.2 eV, which corresponds to ultraviolet with a wavelength of 387 nm. Studies on ZnO have found that there is a certain relationship between the surface composition and structure of ZnO nanoparticles and their photocatalytic properties. Oxygen vacancies on the ZnO surface tend to capture photogenerated electrons, and there is a strong interaction between oxygen vacancies and adsorbed oxygen, which is beneficial for the oxidation reactions.
WO3 is one of the metal oxides having photocatalytic activity. WO3 shows several advantages, including a large specific surface area, excellent absorbing capability, and its potential to be used as invisible material. The band gap of WO3 is 2.8 eV, and WO3 is stable. WO3 can be used both as a main catalyst and as a cocatalyst.
Iron has long been investigated as an important meta-element in the redox reaction. Among iron oxides, Fe2O3 has been widely studied for its high photocatalysis activity. Fe2O3 is an n-type semiconductor, having a forbidden band width of 2.2 eV, a strong light absorption capability in the visible light region, and the ability to absorb a part of sunlight. Fe2O3 can be used as a reducing agent for the photocatalytic reduction of silver ions [89,90] and can also be used to decompose reactive dyes [91,92,93].

3.2. Non-Oxide Photocatalyst

Many non-oxides also have good photocatalytic properties [94,95]. Among them, semiconductor metal sulfides have attracted intense attention because of their special structure and excellent physical and chemical properties. Some such non-oxides include as molybdenum sulfide (MoS2), tungsten sulfide (WS), copper sulfide (CuS) [96], zinc sulfide (ZnS) [97,98], and cadmium sulfide (CdS) [99]. Of course, in addition to the sulfides, nitrides, such as C3N4, also show excellent photocatalytic properties.
Next, we will take CdS, CuS, ZnS, and C3N4 as examples to demonstrate their applications in photocatalysis.

3.2.1. CdS Series Photocatalyst

CdS is a semiconductor material, having a bandgap of about 2.42 eV and a maximum absorption peak of 514 nm. Therefore, CdS can absorb visible light or ultraviolet light with a wavelength of less than 514 nm, which makes CdS more efficient for visible light photocatalysis [100,101]. In addition, the bandgap position of CdS semiconductors is well suited for many photocatalytic reactions, such as water decomposition [100] and CO2 reduction [102]. More importantly, the position of the CdS conduction band edge is lower than the position of other common semiconductors (such as TiO2, SrTiO3, and ZnO) [103]; this means that in the photocatalytic reaction, photoelectrons of CdS have a stronger reducing power. Therefore, CdS has been intensively investigated as a photocatalyst. However, the CdS material is prone to light corrosion, which results in severe limitations on the number of recoverable photocatalyst. To solve this fundamental problem, researchers have proposed some of measures to improve the use ratio of CdS. The most common method is to prepare CdS composite materials using different materials or ion doping methods. The CdS composite also enhances the absorption of long wavelength light, thereby achieving the full utilization of the visible part of natural light.

3.2.2. CuS Series Photocatalyst

CuS is a very important metal sulfide semiconductor material with excellent optoelectronic properties, and it is considered to be a typical P type semiconductor material. CuS has a forbidden band width of 2.2 eV, which has good visible light absorption capacity. When the CuS material absorbs the proper photons, electron-hole pairs are generated. Electrons and holes move to the surface of the material and react with water molecules or oxygen molecules on the surface of the material to produce several substances. These substances have high catalytic activity and can degrade the organic matter adsorbed on the surface of the material.
Because of its excellent properties, CuS has found a wide range of optical, electrical, mechanical, and sensor applications [104,105,106,107], including solar cells, lithium battery electrodes, photothermal conversion, and photocatalysis [108]. CuS nanomaterials have great potential for photocatalysis due to their appropriate energy band and absorption wavelength [109].

3.2.3. ZnS Series Photocatalyst

ZnS is a group of II–VI wide band gap semiconductor materials with a band gap between 3.6 and 3.8 eV. ZnS has two different crystal structures—zinc blende and wurtzite. Among them, zinc blende, also known as β-ZnS, can stably exist at low temperatures, while wurtzite, also known as α-ZnS, can exist stably at temperatures above 1024 °C. ZnS is difficult to oxidize and hydrolyze. More importantly, these properties are still present when the size of ZnS is reduced to the nanometer scale. Thus, ZnS nanomaterials exhibit good photocatalytic activity [110]. Furthermore, ZnS is easily fabricated, non-toxic, and widely used. To date, many research groups have successfully synthesized low-dimensional nanomaterials such as ZnS nanoparticles [40,98,101,111,112,113,114,115,116,117], nanowires [118,119,120,121,122], nanotubes [123,124,125,126], and nanosheets [127,128].
Among the methods for enhancing the photocatalytic activity of ZnS, the following three are the most common approaches. (1) The specific surface area is increased by changing the morphology of ZnS [129,130,131]. The high specific surface area can increase the active site on the ZnS surface and can increase the contact area between ZnS and the reactant, thereby increasing the photocatalytic activity of ZnS. (2) By altering the electronic properties and band structure of ZnS through doping with other metals and non-metallic elements [132], the absorption rate of ZnS to visible light is improved, thereby improving the photocatalytic efficiency of ZnS. (3) ZnS forms a heterojunction with other semiconductors [133] or a composite structure with noble metals [134] to reduce the electron-hole recombination rate, thereby improving the photocatalytic performance of ZnS.

3.2.4. Nitride Series Photocatalyst

In 1989, Liu and Cohen [135] succeeded in replacing the Si atom with the sp3 hybridization of C atoms according to the well-known β-Si3N4 structure. Four sp3 hybridized N atoms are bonded to the C atom, and three C atoms are bonded to each N atom to form a nearly planar structure of the carbon–nitrogen compound. In 1993, Science published one paper on the successful synthesis of C3N4 crystals with a hardness higher than that of diamonds using laser sputtering technology in the Harvard University laboratory [136,137], which quickly attracted the attention of the global materials community. By 1996, Teter and Hemley [138] believed that carbon nitride might have a structure of α phase, β phase, cubic phase, quasi-cubic phase, and graphite-like phase.
In 2009, Wang et al. [139] reported on a polymer semiconductor material g-C3N4 consisting entirely of non-metallic elements. g-C3N4 is a graphite-like layered structure, and g-C3N4 has an excellent electron/hole transporting ability, a high thermal stability and chemical stability, and a narrow band gap (2.7–2.8 eV). The forbidden bandwidth of g-C3N4 allows it to have a strong light absorption in the visible light region (400–450 nm). Furthermore, the structure and properties of g-C3N4 are easy to control, making it a hot research topic in the field of photocatalysts [140,141]. g-C3N4 shows excellent photocatalytic performance in the field of photo hydrolysis, hydrogen production, photodegradation of environmental pollutants, CO2 reduction, sterilization, and synthesis of composite capacitor materials [139,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149].
The forbidden band width of semiconductors is an important factor limiting the wide application of photocatalysts.; as such, the forbidden band widths of some commonly used photocatalysts are summarized in Table 2.

4. Common Preparation Methods

There are many ways to prepare a photocatalyst. In this review, we divide these methods into the electrospinning method, the solid phase method, the liquid phase method, and the vapor phase method.
Next, we will describe the preparation method of a photocatalyst in detail according to the structure of Figure 3.

4.1. Electrospinning

Electrospinning technology is a method of directly producing polymer nanofibers [161,162,163,164,165,166,167,168,169,170,171,172,173,174,175,176,177]. Electrospinning techniques have the advantages of simple manufacturing equipment, low spinning cost, a wide variety of spinnable materials, and a controllable process. Electrospinning technology is one of the major methods for effectively preparing nanofiber materials. Electrospinning technology has been used to produce various nanofibers including organic, organic/inorganic composites, and inorganic nanofibers.
Electrospinning device mainly consists of a high-voltage power supply, a nozzle and liquid supply device, and a fiber receiving device, as shown in Figure 4A. High voltage power supplies typically use a DC power supply that can generate thousands to tens of thousands of volts. The function of the high voltage power supply is to generate a high voltage electric field so that the liquid becomes charged and polarized, eventually forming a jet. The liquid supply device is a container (such as a syringe) having a capillary at one end, and the container is filled with a polymer solution or melt. In addition, as experimental requirements have increased, many experiments have gradually adopted liquid flow control systems that allow for a more accurate control of liquid flow. The fiber receiving device is a metal receiving plate at the opposite end of the nozzle and may be a rotating roller or an aluminum foil layer on the plane of the metal plate. The receiving device is grounded with a wire and connected to the negative electrode of the high voltage power source.
During electrospinning, the high voltage electric field melts and deforms the polymer solution, which then forms conical droplets that protrude at the end of the showerhead. When the repulsive force of the surface of the droplet exceeds the surface tension, a minute jet ejects from the surface of the droplet. These jets undergo a high-speed stretching of electric field force at short distances, the solvent volatilizes and solidifies, and, finally, it deposits on the receiving plate to form polymer fibers. Figure 4B shows an SEM image of a polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) /TiO2 fiber film prepared by an electrospinning method. We can observe that the nanofiber membrane prepared by electrospinning has a porous structure. The conventional fiber has a specific surface area of 0.4 m2g−1, as compared with a conventional fiber membrane, and the electrospinning fiber has a specific surface area of about 40 m2g−1 [163]. The electrospinning fiber membrane has a large specific surface area, which can effectively solve the disadvantage that the specific surface area of the photocatalyst is small. In addition, the prepared fiber membrane is advantageous for the recovery of the photocatalyst and the reduction of secondary pollution.
In the process of manufacturing nanofibers by electrospinning, the voltage, solution viscosity, surface tension, solvent evaporation rate, and conductivity of the electrospinning operation are numerous, and their relationship is complex. These factors all affect the average diameter and uniformity of the fiber to different extents.

4.2. Solid Phase Method

The solid phase method is a method in which a reaction raw material is thoroughly mixed and ground at a certain stoichiometric ratio before being calcined at a specific temperature to obtain a product [178,179,180,181,182]. The solid phase method has the advantages of a simple apparatus, convenient operation, low cost, uniform particle size, and controllable force. In the solid phase method, no solvent is required; thus, hard agglomeration, which may occur in the liquid phase, can be avoided, and environmental pollution can be reduced. However, the solid phase method also has the disadvantage that the particles are easy to aggregate, the powder is not fine enough, the impurities are easily mixed, and the oxidation of the ions is easy.

4.3. Gas Phase Method

The gas-phase method refers to direct use of gas or a means to change a substance into a gas—making it physically or chemically react in a gas state—to agglomerate and grow to form nanoparticles in the cooling process. In the gas phase method, nanoparticles having high purity, and good nanoparticle properties can be produced. However, the gas phase method also requires advanced techniques and equipment. Vapor phase methods include physical vapor deposition (PVD), chemical vapor deposition (CVD), and molecular beam epitaxy (MBE).

4.3.1. Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD)

Chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [183,184] is a method of forming a thin film by chemical reaction to one or more vapor phase elements or compounds on the surface of a substrate. CVD can be used to deposit metals, carbides, nitrides, oxides, borides, and the like. CVD can be applied to the surfaces of complex geometric shapes and has a good adhesion to the film base. Therefore, the development of CVD is very rapid. Depending on different reactants and control conditions, CVD can be further divided into atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition, low pressure chemical vapor deposition, plasma CVD, laser CVD, and metal–organic CVD. Thanks to the development of thin film manufacturing technology, CVD has been continuously developed and improved. However, the equipment and cost required for CVD is relatively high. In addition, CVD possesses many disadvantages, such as uneven microscopic surface roughness of the resulting film and particle size (50–150 nm), as well as a relatively large surface roughness of the film.

4.3.2. Physical Vapor Deposition (PVD)

Physical vapor deposition (PVD) is a method in which a paint is vaporized by a physical method to form a film on the substrate surface. In addition to conventional vacuum deposition and sputter deposition techniques, PVD includes various ion beam deposition, ion plating, and ion beam assisted deposition techniques that have prospered in recent years. Types of deposition include vacuum deposition, sputtering, and ion plating [185,186,187,188]. PVD is a common technique for producing hard coatings (hard films). Compared with CVD, the PVD method has a low deposition temperature and does not easily cause deformation and cracking of the substrate. Films produced by PVD are uniform and possess easy to control structures and properties. However, the PVD preparation of the film must be carried out under a vacuum, and the equipment necessary for film formation is expensive.
To date, PVD methods can deposit not only alloy films and metal films but also ceramics, compounds, polymer films, semiconductors, and so on.

4.3.3. Molecular Beam Epitaxy (MBE)

Molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) is a newly developed method of film production and is also a special vacuum coating process. MBE is a new manufacturing technology for single crystal films [189,190,191,192,193]. MBE means to spray a hot atomic beam or molecular beam onto the surface of a heated substrate under vacuum conditions and react with the surface of the substrate to deposit the film.
The advantages of MBE include the facts that the beam intensity is easy to control precisely, the surface morphology of the epitaxial material can be made into a multi-layer structure of different compositions, and the composition and doping of the epitaxial layer can be changed at will. MBE can accurately control the thickness of the epitaxial layer, the doping profile of the heterojunction interface, and the flatness of the heterojunction interface, which is beneficial for improving the purity and integrity of the epitaxial layer. MBE has made it possible to control the precise growth of atomic layers and subsequent atomic layers. MBE can produce thin monocrystalline thin films on the order of tens of atomic layers and can also produce thin films with different doping and different compositions.

4.4. Liquid Phase Method

The liquid phase method is also called a wet chemical method. In the liquid phase method, it is necessary to first select an appropriate soluble metal salt and then prepare a solution according to the composition of the prepared material [194,195,196]. Second, suitable precipitating agents are selected to precipitate or crystallize the metal ions in the solution; they may also operate by evaporation, sublimation, hydrolysis, etc. to cause precipitation or crystallization. Finally, the precipitate or crystal is dehydrated or thermally decomposed to obtain the desired raw material powder.
There are many methods for preparing photocatalytic films by liquid-phase method, such as the sol–gel method, the precipitation method, the liquid deposition method, and the hydrothermal method.

4.4.1. Sol–Gel Method

The sol–gel method is a wet chemical approach used to prepare nanoparticles [197]. In the sol–gel method, a precursor is dissolved in a solvent, and a sol is formed through hydrolysis or alcoholysis. The sol is then converted into a gel after prolonged storage or drying. Figure 5 shows the process of preparing nanomaterials by a sol–gel method.
Among the nanoparticles prepared by the sol–gel method, the most important factors are the formation of the sol and gel. There are many complicated parameters affecting the sol–gel process. At present, most people think that the four main parameters have important influence on the sol–gel process. These are the pH of the solution, the concentration of the solution, the reaction temperature, and the reaction time.
The sol–gel process has the advantages of high purity, high uniformity, low synthesis temperature, and easy control of the reaction conditions [198,199,200]. The preparation process of the sol–gel process is relatively simple and does not require special or expensive equipment. The problem of the sol–gel method is that the raw material is generally titanium alkoxide, a large amount of organic solvent is required, and the obtained film is heat-treated at a relatively high temperature. Therefore, the film forming cost is relatively high, the adhesion of the film is poor, and the transparency is poor.

4.4.2. Precipitation Method

The precipitation method is one of the most common methods for synthesizing nanomaterials. In the precipitation method, substances with different chemical components are mixed, and a precipitant is added to obtain a precursor precipitate. The precursor precipitate is then dried or calcined to produce the corresponding nanoparticles [201,202,203,204,205,206]. When the particle diameter is about 1 μm, a precipitate is formed. The particle size of the particles generally depends on the solubility of the precipitate and the supersaturation degree of the solution. The smaller the solubility of the precipitate is, the smaller the diameter of the particle produces, and the smaller the supersaturation degree of the solution is, the larger the diameter of the particle forms.
The photocatalyst prepared by the precipitation method has good light absorption capability and can promote the separation of holes, and it can thereby improve photocatalytic performance. In the precipitation process, many of the heavy metals added do not readily react in solution and may introduce impurities into the solution, which limits the application of the precipitation method. During the operation of the precipitation method, the reaction temperature, time, pH value, ratio of reactants, titration rate, and other factors have a certain influence on the material preparation. The precipitation method shows the characteristics of low cost, simple process, and safety.

4.4.3. Liquid Deposition Method

In the liquid deposition method, a substrate is immersed in an appropriate reaction solution, and a uniform and dense film is deposited onto the substrate. These films obtained by the liquid deposition process usually consist of oxides or hydroxides [207,208,209,210,211]. The liquid deposition method is suitable for substrates of various shapes, and it does not require a high temperature during film formation or expensive equipment. The liquid deposition method can be used not only to prepare a single oxide film but also to prepare a composite oxide film, a multi-component oxide film, a metal fine-particle-dispersed oxide film, a laminated oxide film, and so on. The reaction principle of liquid deposition method is not complicated. The process is simple, and the film formation rate is high. The benefit/cost ratio is large, while the pollution to the environment is small. In addition, several disadvantages of liquid deposition methods have been solved, which means that liquid deposition methods have wide application prospects.
For example, Zhou et al. [212,213,214] immersed a substrate glass sheet in a reaction solution to obtain a transparent anatase type TiO2 film at 35 °C. The reaction solution containing a complex TiF62−, F ion trapping agent H3BO3 and a crystallization-inducing agent of TiO2. The thickness of the film obtained by the liquid phase deposition method increases as the deposition time increases, and when the deposition time is 9 h, the resulting film thickness is about 260 nm. The photocatalytic activity of TiO2 thin film after heat treatment at different temperatures was evaluated by the photocatalytic degradation of a methylene blue experiment. The results showed that the TiO2 film heated at 300 °C has the highest photocatalytic activity, and its activity is equivalent to five times that of TiO2 film deposited at 35 °C.

4.4.4. Hydrothermal Method

In the hydrothermal method, an inorganic or organic compound is mixed with water at a temperature of 100–350 °C and a high pressure, and then an improved inorganic substance is obtained through several steps. The resulting inorganic substance is filtered, washed, and dried to obtain ultrafine particles of high purity [7,215,216,217,218,219,220].
The hydrothermal preparation of the film is carried out in the liquid phase, and no post treatment is required. This feature of the hydrothermal method avoids defects such as curl, cracks, particle coarsening, and film-to-gas reactions that can occur during heat treatment of the film. The hydrothermal method uses an inorganic substance as the precursor and water as the reaction medium, which avoids a series of disadvantages resulting from the use of organometallic materials. The hydrothermal method has many advantages, including mild conditions, a stable system, little environmental pollution, an easy process, and a low cost. In addition, films prepared by the hydrothermal method have good uniformity, firmly adhere to the substrate, and are not limited by the shape and size of the substrate [221]. The hydrothermal method can also achieve uniform doping and preparation of the nanocomposite by adjusting the proportion of the product or by adding a surfactant.

5. Methods for Improving Photocatalytic Efficiency

By investigating the mechanism of photocatalytic reaction, it is known that semiconductor photocatalysis shows the advantages of mild reaction conditions, high efficiency, and a wide application range. However, semiconductor photocatalytic reactions also suffer from drawbacks in practical applications such as narrow absorption spectra, low photon quantum efficiency, and an easy recombination of photogenerated holes. The recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes is unfavorable for photocatalytic reactions. Therefore, reducing the recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes is an effective way to improve photocatalytic efficiency [48,222,223]. Many methods have been reported for improving the photocatalytic efficiency of semiconductors such as precious metal deposition, semiconductor compounds, metal or non-metal particle doping, and surface dye sensitization.

5.1. Precious Metal Depositing

Precious metal deposition on semiconductor surfaces considered to be an effective way of capturing excited electrons. The basic principle of precious metal deposition on a semiconductor surface is as follows. When the noble metal and the semiconductor are in contact, the work function of the metal is larger than the work function of the semiconductor, so the electron continuously moves from the semiconductor to the metal until the energy levels of both are equal. Thus, the metal surface and the semiconductor surface each obtain excessive negative and positive charges, causing band bending near the interface where the semiconductor is in contact with the metal, thereby forming a Schottky barrier. The Schottky barrier can capture photogenerated electrons at the surface of the semiconductor and suppress the recombination of electron-hole pairs [224], thereby improving photocatalytic efficiency.
Among the surface precious metal deposits, the most commonly used metal is the Pt of Group VIII [225,226,227,228,229,230,231,232]. In addition to Pt, noble metals such as Ag [233,234,235,236,237,238], Ru [239,240], Pd [241,242,243,244,245], and Au [246,247,248,249,250] are also used to improve the photocatalytic performance of semiconductors. However, the major disadvantage of precious metals such as Ag, Ru, Pd, and Au is that the price is relatively high and not suitable for large scale applications [251,252,253,254,255,256,257].
Take TiO2 as an example. Due to the large ionic radius of the noble metal, it is impossible to enter the TiO2 lattice. Therefore, in order to improve the photocatalytic performance of TiO2, it is possible to change the surface characteristics of TiO2 by depositing a noble metal on the surface of TiO2 photocatalyst [258,259,260,261]. The surface modification of a noble metal to TiO2 photocatalyst is achieved by changing the electron distribution [261]. When TiO2 contacts the noble metal, carriers are redistributed, and a space charge layer is formed on the surface of the TiO2 close to the metal particle interface. The space charge layer facilitates the transfer of photogenerated electrons to the interface between the noble metal and TiO2 [258,259,262], thereby suppressing the recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes, improving photocatalytic efficiency.
Klein et al. [263] deposited single atom and diatomic clusters (Pd, Pt, Ag/Pd, Ag/Pt, and Pd/Pt) on the surface of TiO2 (P25) using a high energy radiation reduction method. By the photocatalytic decomposition of toluene, it was found that palladium/platinum–titanium dioxide (Pd/Pt–TiO2) has the strongest decomposing ability for toluene in the ultraviolet and visible range. Two methods in Klein’s experiment are shown in Figure 6. In the comparison of different preparation methods, it was found that the sample prepared by the one-step method had the highest degradation ability to phenol in the visible range. Zhang et al. [264] deposited Au nanoparticles on the surface of sulfated TiO2. Au nanoparticles have excellent electron trapping ability and can effectively prolong the lifetime of electron-hole pairs. In the photocatalyst experiment, under the condition of pH = 6.5, the decomposition rate of the photocatalyst to Congo red dye can reach 97.6%. Padilla et al. [265] used an innovative sonic degradation deposition method to deposit a series of noble metals on the surface of TiO2 within 10–20 s. These precious metals include single or complex noble metals such as Au, Cu, Pd, Pt, Au–Pd, Au–Cu, Au–Fe, Au–Co, Au–Pt–Au–Rh, and Au–Ru. In photocatalytic experiments under room temperature and visible light conditions, the decomposition rate of methyl orange dye was highest with the AuPd/TiO2 (mass ratio of Au: Pd is 3:1) catalyst.
Most precious metals are toxic, expensive, and not suitable for a wide range of applications. Relatively speaking, Ag is one of the most popular precious metals because it is less toxic and not expensive. Jaafar et al. [266] applied a mild in situ electrochemical method to deposit Ag nanoparticles on the surface of TiO2. A photocatalytic decomposition experiment of chlorophenol was carried out using the prepared catalyst under the condition of pH = 5. After 6 h of photocatalytic decomposition, the decomposition rate of the Ag–TiO2 photocatalyst was 94%, much higher than that of the other photocatalysts. Though the silver–oxygen–titanium (Ag–O–Ti) chemical bond will reduce the catalytic activity of the material to some extent, the proper content of Ag and the oxygen vacancies on the surface of the material can effectively prevent the recombination of electron-hole pairs, thereby improving the photocatalytic efficiency of the photocatalyst.

5.2. Semiconductor Compound

A semiconductor composite photocatalyst is realized by two types of band-matched semiconductors. The methods for achieving semiconductor recombination include simple combinations, doping, multilayer structure, and out of phase combination. The essence of semiconductor blending to improve the photocatalytic performance is that photogenerated electrons or holes generated by a semiconductor move to the conduction band or the valence band of another semiconductor to separate photogenerated electrons and holes, thus effectively suppressing the recombination of carriers [252].
Arabzadeh et al. [267] combined a single-dimensional cadmium sulfide (CdS) nanowire with a TiO2 nanoparticle by a hot solvent method to form a catalyst for a core-shell structure. In photocatalysis experiments, cadmium sulfide/titanium dioxide (CdS/TiO2) photocatalysts can completely decompose methyl orange, methylene blue, and rhodamine B, and the photocatalytic decomposition time is only 2–3 min. Wu et al. [268] prepared a nanorod FeVO4–TiO2 composite catalyst by the coprecipitation method. In the NO gas conversion experiment, the decomposition rate of NO by the nanorod FeVO4–TiO2 composite catalyst was more than 1.5 times that of the nanoparticle FeVO4–TiO2 composite catalyst. Chu et al. [269] prepared a MoSe2–TiO2 composite photocatalyst by using a hot solvent method. Cr6+ ions were reduced by using pure MoSe2, pure TiO2, and complex MoSe2–TiO2 as the photocatalysts. After 120 min of visible light irradiation, the reduction rate of Cr6+ by pure MoSe2 and pure TiO2 was only 61% and 2%, respectively, while the conversion rate of composite catalyst MoSe2–TiO2 was as high as 91%. Das et al. [270] prepared a zirconium dioxide–titanium dioxide (ZrO2–TiO2) composite semiconductor photocatalyst by the sol–gel method. In the research of industrial printing and dyeing wastewater purification, there is a relationship between the degradation rate of pollutants and the radiation time, pH, sewage concentration, and catalyst concentration. The concentration of organic pollutants, especially, has the greatest influence on the degradation rate of pollutants.
Shen et al. [271,272] reported the use of wet chemical methods to synthesize large-sized porous InVO4 spheroids and large-sized porous g-C3N4 particles. Next, nano-TiO2 particles were composited on the surfaces of InVO4 and g-C3N4 to obtain a semiconductor composite material having a large size, porosity, and narrow band gap. Experiments show that, in addition to improving the quantum effect of the material, the semiconductor composite material also increases the specific surface area of the material. Higher specific surface areas provide more reactive sites, thereby extending the lifetime of photogenerated electron-hole pairs.
In multicomponent modified TiO2, as compared to one-component modified TiO2, different components can be combined with one another such that the catalyst has different degrees of improvement in light absorption performance and electron-hole separation efficiency. Gao et al. [273] used photoreduction deposition and chemical bath deposition to prepare Pt and CdS nanoparticles on co-modified TiO2 nanotubes. The decomposition rate of methyl orange dye with Pt and CdS co-modified TiO2 nanotubes reached 91.9% under visible light. The decomposition rate of methyl orange fueled by a pure TiO2, Pt/TiO2, and CdS/TiO2 single composite catalyst is much lower than 91.9%. Experimental results showed that CdS and Pt have a synergistic effect in which CdS can attract holes to form an active center and Pt can promote photogenerated electron transfer. Therefore, TiO2 co-doped with CdS and Pt has a significant improvement in photon capture rate and carrier separation efficiency. Feng et al. [274] used a hydrothermal method to prepare a multilayer semiconductor composite TiO2 nanotube array. Under the irradiation of solar light, the composite TiO2 nanotube can completely degrade p-nitrophenol and rhodamine B in 20 min and 80 min, respectively.

5.3. Metal or Non-Metal Ion Doping

The introduction of impurity in the forbidden band by ion doping is one of the most common and effective methods for improving semiconductor performance. As early as 1982, Borgarello [275] mixed chromium ions (Cr5+) into TiO2 to realize visible light cracking water. On one hand, ion doping can increase the concentration of semiconductor carriers, but, on the other hand, it is possible to form ion traps to capture electrons and holes and reduce the recombination of electron-hole pairs. Ion doping causes the red shift of the TiO2 photocatalyst, and the photo response of the photocatalyst can be extended to the visible region. According to the types of doped ions, ion doping can be classified into metal ion doping, non-metal ion doping, and metal/non-metal ion simultaneous doping.

5.3.1. Metal Ion Doping

Metal ion doping is the most commonly used method for photocatalyst modification. The metal ion doping method is to dope transition metal ions in the catalyst by high-temperature firing or auxiliary deposition. The influence of metal ion doping on the photocatalyst mainly includes the suppression of recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes, as well as the expansion of the response spectrum range of the photocatalyst. By doping TiO2 with chromium and vanadium ions, the excitation wavelength range of TiO2 can be expanded to the visible light region (to the vicinity of 600 nm). However, the incorporation of metal ions sometimes becomes the recombination center of electrons and holes, affecting the photocatalytic effect. The type and concentration of doping ions are different, and the influence on the photocatalysis experiment also differs. Experimentally doped metal ions include transition metal ions and rare earth metal ions.
Transition metal ions mainly include cobalt ions (Co2+), iron ions (Fe3+), and copper ions (Cu2+). Different metal ion doping shows different effects on the performance of a photocatalyst. Doping some specific metal ions can improve the photon efficiency, such as Fe3+ [255], while doping some other metal ions, such as Cr3+, is harmful [253]. Choi et al. [276] studied more than 20 metal ion doped TiO2 nanocrystals and found that doping 0.5 wt% of Fe3+, Ru2+, Mo5+, Re2+, Os2+, V5+, and Rh2+ in the crystal lattice can increases the photocatalytic activity of photocatalyst. Wang et al. [277] applied a simple hydrothermal method to prepare Fe3+ doped TiO2 nanotube array catalysts. The semiconductor catalyst prepared at a concentration of Fe3+ of 1 mmol/L showed good catalytic performance under irradiation with a solar lamp. The time required for the Fe3+ doped semiconductor catalyst to decompose 98.79% methyl blue is only 120 min. The reduction ratio of Cr6+ by the Fe3+-doped semiconductor catalyst is as high as 83.79%, which is much higher than the reduction ratio of pure TiO2 to Cr6+ (39.6%). Inturi et al. [278] produced Cr3+ doped TiO2 nanoparticle photocatalysts by three preparation methods and found that the doping samples prepared by flame spraying method have higher catalytic performance than other preparation methods. The sample prepared by the flame spray method degraded chlorophenol under visible light, and the decomposition rate reached 61% in just 5 h. Nanoparticles prepared by the flame spray method have a high specific surface area and increase the active site of the complex, thereby improving its photocatalytic efficiency. Ma et al. [279] used a co-precipitation method to prepare Mg, Zn, and Cr—three kinds of ion co-doped TiO2 nano-catalysts—and used them to degrade Congo red dye. Experimental results showed that the MgZnCr–TiO2 catalyst has good catalytic performance in the visible range. The MgZnCr–TiO2 sample has recyclability and maintains a stable photocatalytic performance after five cycles.
Rare earth elements were originally used as surface treatment agents for TiO2 to improve the vividness of TiO2. With the rapid development of photocatalysts, the role of rare earth elements becomes more important. Rare earth metal ions have a special electronic layer structure compared to transition metal ions. In addition to the benefits of doped transition metals, the doping of rare earth metal ions can also cause semiconductor lattice distortion and impurity defects, form traps for electron holes, and enhance the quantum effect of the semiconductor catalyst. Villabonaleal et al. [280] analyzed the catalytic properties of Lanthanum (La), Cerium (Ce), Praseodymium (Pr), Neodymium (Nd), Samarium (Sm), Europium (Eu), and Gadolinium (Gd) rare earth doped TiO2. They found that the atomic number and concentration of the lanthanide influence the band gap energy and the specific surface area of the catalyst but have little influence on visible light absorption. Malengreaux et al. [281] prepared TiO2 semiconductor photocatalysts with Fe3+, Cr3+, La3+, and Eu3+ ions doped and co-doped by a sol–gel method. In the experiment of decomposing p-nitrophenol under ultraviolet and visible light, the La–Fe–TiO2 catalyst showed better photocatalytic ability than the other samples.

5.3.2. Non-Metal Ion Doping

The doping of many metals such as V3+, V4+, Cr3+, Mn3+, Fe3+, Co3+, Ni2+, Zn2+, Ga3+, Zr4+, and Nb5+ can expand the spectral response range of TiO2 to the visible region [282,283]. In addition, some metal-doped TiO2 are not thermodynamically stable and easily cause an increase in recombination centers, thereby reducing the light absorption efficiency of TiO2. Many researchers have therefore chosen to dope TiO2 with non-metal atoms that form covalent bonds with titanium atoms [284]. In 2001, Japanese scientist Asahi et al. [285] prepared a TiO2-xNx photocatalyst using non-metallic N-doped TiO2. The TiO2-xNx photocatalyst extends the optical excitation wavelength of TiO2 to the visible region of 400–520 nm (Figure 7A) and maintains the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 in the ultraviolet region. Methyl blue and acetaldehyde decomposition experiments showed that the TiO2-xNx photocatalyst shows high photocatalytic activity under both ultraviolet and visible light (Figure 7B).
The research of TiO2 has opened a new research area on a non-metal doped modified TiO2 visible light catalyst, which is undoubtedly a pioneering work. Afterwards, scientists conducted systematic and detailed research on the doping modification of a TiO2 photocatalyst with nonmetallic elements. Non-metals generally used for semiconductor doping are N [285,286,287,288,289,290], C [55,291,292,293], S [101,292,294,295,296,297,298,299], P [297,300,301], F [290,302,303,304,305,306,307], Cl [308], I [309], B [310,311,312,313], and Si [314,315,316], among others.
Kitano et al. [286] reported the preparation of N–TiO2 films by the radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering (RF-MS) deposition method, in which an N2/Ar mixture was used as a sputtering gas. It was found that the absorption band of the N–TiO2 photocatalyst was shifted to the visible region, and the catalytic performance of the N–TiO2 photocatalyst under visible light was remarkably improved. Simsek et al. [317] described the use of a hot solvent method to prepare a boron (B) ion doped TiO2 catalyst, and they studied the effect of the boron doping amount and pH on the degradation of environmental pollutants. The experiment result shows the following: After UV irradiation for 300 min, the decomposition rates of pure TiO2 and B–TiO2 relative to dichlorophenol were 75.7% and 89.7%, respectively, and the decomposition rates of bisphenol A were 97.3% and 99.1%, respectively. After irradiation with visible light for 300 min, the decomposition rates of pure TiO2 and B–TiO2 relative to dichlorophenol were 20.2% and 75.1%, respectively, and the decomposition rates of bisphenol A were 46.0% and 97.7%, respectively. Since the forbidden band width of the B-doped TiO2 semiconductor decreases, the modified material has an absorption response in the visible light region. In addition, two chemical bonds of B–O–Ti and B–O–B are formed during the doping process, and these two chemical bonds not only provide stable performance but also function as traps of photogenerated electrons. He et al. [318] synthesized a C-doped TiO2 photocatalyst by the hydrothermal method. As a carbon source, chitosan forms a porous morphology of the composite TiO2, and a Ti–C chemical bond in the complex that promotes formation of surface oxygen vacancies. The porous morphology of the composite TiO2 and the surface oxygen vacancies together improve the capture rate of organic molecules by the photocatalyst and improve the photocatalytic performance. The conversion rate of composite TiO2 under visible light to NO gas can reach 71%.
Multi-component non-metal doping can also improve the catalytic ability of TiO2 to some extent. Elsheikh et al. [319] used a one-step hydrothermal method to synthesize C and N element co-doped TiO2 photocatalysts, and they used different molar concentrations of glycine to make the materials contain different proportions of brookite/anatase. Under visible light irradiation, the degradation rate of pure TiO2 to ibuprofen was only 11.1%, but the degradation rate of C–N–TiO2 was 100%. Zhang et al. [320] synthesized a TiO2 photocatalyst co-doped with fluorine and graphene oxide by the hydrothermal method. The decomposition rate of bromate by the complex TiO2 photocatalyst was found to exceed 90% after UV irradiation for 15 min. The doping of fluoride ions can increase the number of high surface energy (001) crystal planes of TiO2, while doped graphene oxide gives TiO2 excellent conductivity and large specific surface area. Therefore, after introducing fluoride ions and graphene oxide, the transfer efficiency of photogenerated electrons can be effectively accelerated, and the photocatalytic efficiency can be improved.

5.3.3. Mixed Doping

Nonmetallic ions can also be used in combination with metal ions. Theoretically, the simultaneous doping of metal ions and non-metal ions can simultaneously obtain the advantages of metal ions and non-metal ions. Lei et al. [321] applied the hydrothermal method to prepare Fe, N, and C co-doped TiO2 photocatalysts. In the study of the reduction and degradation of a Cr6+ solution, the conversion of the Fe–N–C–TiO2 catalyst reached 100%, which was much higher than other photocatalysts such as C–TiO2 and N–C–TiO2. Chen et al. [322] prepared TiO2 co-doped with Ce and N via a sol–gel method and then incorporated diatomaceous earth particles into Ce–N–TiO2 to form a composite photocatalyst. N ion doping reduces the forbidden bandgap of the TiO2 composite catalyst, and the composite TiO2 becomes a photoelectron trap due to the special 4f energy level of the Ce element. Therefore, under visible light irradiation for 240 min, the degradation rate of oxytetracycline by Ce–N–TiO2/G is almost 100%, which is much higher than other catalysts. Han et al. [323] used a sol–gel method to prepare Zr, Ni and N co-doped TiO2 catalyst. Under visible light irradiation, the conversion of NO and SO2 gas by the three element co-doped TiO2 photocatalyst is much higher than that of the single or two element (Zr, Ni, N) doped TiO2 photocatalyst. Mixed doping can effectively increase the light absorption of the composite in the visible region, which is the main reason for the enhanced photocatalytic activity.

5.4. Surface Dye Photosensitization

Surface dye photosensitization refers to the process of using a photosensitizer to broaden the wavelength response range of the photochemical reaction. Photosensitizers are usually some inorganic or organic chromophores. Photosensitizers have strong absorption under visible light and can extend the spectral response range of the photocatalytic system to the visible region. Therefore, the sensitized semiconductor catalyst can be excited with visible light of a much lower energy than ultraviolet light, which can broaden the application of a photocatalyst in the visible light region. Previous work on the photosensitization of semiconductor dyes mainly involved solar cells and photocatalytic hydrogen production, and in recent years the use of dye-sensitized semiconductor catalysts for decomposing organic pollutants has attracted the intense attention of researchers. Surface dye photosensitization has become one of the common methods for modifying semiconductor catalysts. Common photosensitizers include various organic dyes and transition metal complexes such as Ru and Pt chloride.
Wan et al. [324] used a modified hydrothermal reflux composite preparation method to prepare porphyrin-sensitized TiO2/reduced graphene oxide (TiO2/RGO) composite nanorod catalysts. Under visible light irradiation, the decomposition rate of methylene blue by TiO2/RGO composite nanorods is very high at 92%, which is 4.3 times the decomposition rate of pure TiO2 nanorods to methylene blue. Zoltan et al. [325] used three asymmetric sensitizers 5-(p-Nitrophenyl)-10,15,20-triphenylporphyrin, Cu(II)-porphyrin, and Zn(II)-porphyrin] for the sensitization modification of polycrystalline TiO2 powder. The experimental results showed that the degradation rate of Congo red by the Zn(II)-porphyrin sensitized TiO2 semiconductor catalyst is higher than that of other photocatalysts. Zhao et al. [326] attached the carboxylate porphyrins of Cu, Co, and Zn to the surface of TiO2 by a hydrothermal method. In the degradation study of nitrophenol, the three sensitized semiconductor catalysts had a higher catalytic activity than pure TiO2. Among the three sensitized semiconductor catalysts, Cu-porphyrin-TiO2 has the best decomposition ability of nitrophenol. This is because Cu ions are excellent electron acceptors, and it is easier to attract electrons to reach a stable state, thereby achieving the effect of separating electron-hole pairs. Wei et al. [327] used a two-step method of hydrothermal and reflux to prepare a Cu(II)-tetrakis(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin and RGO co-sensitized TiO2 nanorod photocatalyst. After irradiation for 120 min under visible light, the decomposition rate of methylene blue by the composite TiO2 photocatalyst was 95%, which was five times that of pure TiO2 to methylene blue. Furthermore, the composite TiO2 photocatalyst still maintained stable catalytic performance after being used six times in photocatalyst experiments.
Chowdhury et al. [328] reported the use of eosin dye to photosensitize TiO2 and successfully reduced the band gap of a TiO2 semiconductor by 1 eV. After sensitization, the catalyst showed a strong photo response in the visible region. Eosin dyes can inject excited electrons into the TiO2 conduction band to achieve the same function as photogenerated electrons. Altin et al. [329] photosensitized Co-TiO2 nano-doped particles with a metal-free complex-free phthalocyanine dye derivative by the sol–gel method. The prepared semiconductor catalyst exhibited an obviously red shift in the absorption wavelength, a shift which improved the application of the catalyst in the visible region. In the study of pollutant degradation, it was found that the photosensitization photocatalyst prepared by using Tween 20 surfactant had the best degradation performance, and the degradation rate of methyl orange (MB) dye (10 mg/L) by the photosensitization photocatalyst reached 60.3% under 150 min of visible light irradiation. Albay et al. [330] employed a deposition method to cure the novel Cu(II)-phthalocyanine derivative on the surface of TiO2 nanoparticles to achieve a photosensitization modification. The results showed that photosensitization has little effect on the morphology of TiO2, but photosensitized TiO2 enhances the response to visible light. Under visible light, the bactericidal capacity of photosensitized TiO2 and the conversion rate of photosensitized TiO2 to Cr6+ ions are much higher than those of a pure TiO2 photocatalyst.
As a traditional modification method, surface dye photosensitization has been well developed in its development and application. One frequently used method of sensitization is to apply many dyes to the surface of the semiconductor. This method achieves good results in sensitization applications for nanoparticle solar cells, and there are articles about this method in famous journals such as Nature [331,332]. While the photosensitization of surface dyes can improve the photo responsive range and photocatalytic efficiency of photosensitized semiconductor catalysts, the photosensitization of surface dyes also has some drawbacks. First, the presence of surface photosensitizers limits the increase in photocatalytic efficiency of semiconductor photocatalysts. Second, the stability of photosensitizers for long-term use is questioned. Photosensitizers can fall off from the surface of the catalyst and can result in the secondary contamination to water. Furthermore, some photosensitizing dyes, such as ruthenium-based dyes, are expensive and not suitable for a wide range of applications.
In Table 3, we summarize both the advantages and disadvantages of the above modification methods.

6. Application

6.1. Photocatalytic Hydrogen Production

In recent decades, the use of petroleum and coal resources has been increasing, and the number of unrepairable resources on Earth is getting fewer and fewer. Furthermore, combustion of fossil fuels has caused many environmental problems that have significantly influenced the development of science and technology, as well as the daily life of humans.
Hydrogen is considered the most promising clean energy source of the 21st century. Hydrogen is characterized by being odorless, non-toxic, environmentally friendly, and capable of producing a large amount of energy. Hydrogen energy is a secondary energy source and needs to be prepared from other hydrogen-containing substances such as water and fossil fuels. There are a variety of ways of producing hydrogen, and the most common way is to decompose fossil fuels to produce hydrogen. However, this method relies on fossil fuels in the final analysis. The photocatalytic degradation of water to produce hydrogen to achieve the conversion of solar energy to hydrogen energy is an effective method to solve energy and environmental problems. The photocatalytic decomposition of water to generate hydrogen can convert solar energy into hydrogen energy, which is an effective method to solve energy and environmental problems.
Since the first photocatalytic decomposition of water to produce hydrogen in 1972, researchers have used powdered semiconductor materials to achieve the photocatalytic decomposition of water to produce hydrogen [7,215,216,217,218,219,220]. Photocatalytic hydrogen production not only achieves the use of solar energy but also reduces environmental problems caused by energy use. Therefore, photocatalytic technology is considered to be the most ideal and cleanest way to produce and utilize energy [333,334].
Monoatomic catalysts can reduce costs by reducing the amount of precious metals used, but the challenge is how to maintain catalyst stability. Zhang et al. synthesized a bimetallic MXene nanosheet Mo2TiC2Tx [335]. A large amount of Mo vacancies formed in the outer layer of the Mo2TiC2Tx, and after the Pt atoms were fixed in these vacancies, the hydrogen generation effectiveness of the Mo2TiC2Tx was greatly improved, as shown in Figure 8B. The hydrogen evolution catalytic activity of the catalyst reached a current density of 100 mA/cm2, requiring only an overpotential of 77 mV. Mo2TiC2Tx has a 40-fold increase in mass activity compared to the commercially available platinum–carbon catalyst. Studies have shown that the superior catalytic performance and stability of Mo2TiC2Tx arises from the covalent effect of Pt and MXene. As shown in Figure 8A, Mo2TiC2Tx-PtSA showed the best performance in all samples.
Bi et al. [336] synthesized g-C3N4 combined with PtNix. As shown in Figure 9A, the PtNix/g-C3N4 composites with different mass ratios have higher photocatalytic activities than pure g-C3N4. In the composite material, 2.5% PtNix/g-C3N4 (8456 μmol·h−1g−1) shows the highest rate of photocatalytic hydrogen generation, which is about 16 times of the rate of pure g-C3N4 (515 μmol·h−1g−1) photocatalytic hydrogen. From Figure 9B, the emission peak of pure g-C3N4 at about 470 nm can be observed, which is recombined in response to band gap electron-hole pairs. In addition, 2.5% PtNix/g-C3N4 shows a weaker emission peak intensity relative to pure g-C3N4, which means that the photoexcitation electron and hole recombination rate in 2.5% PtNix/g-C3N4 is lower [337,338]. In other words, after loading PtNix onto g-C3N4, it can effectively suppress the recombination of the photogenerated charge, thereby improving photocatalytic performance.
Jiang et al. [339] prepared a Bi3TiNbO9 and Cr/Nb co-doped Bi3Ti1−2xCrxNb1+xO9 (x = 0.1, 0.2, 0.3) photocatalyst by the solid state reaction method. The doping of Cr/Nb can reduce the band gap of Bi3TiNbO9 by 1 eV. Figure 10A shows the hydrogen evolution experiment of all samples under full range illumination. Continuous hydrogen generation was detected through the experiment, and Cr/Nb co-doped Bi3TiNbO9 showed a higher hydrogen generation rate than pure Bi3TiNbO9. In the doped sample, Bi3Ti0.8Cr0.1Nb1.1O9 (x = 0.1) showed the highest hydrogen generation rate, which was about twice that of pure Bi3TiNbO9. However, as the amount of Cr/Nb doping further increased, the hydrogen generation rate of the photocatalyst after doping decreased by 40%. The average photocatalytic hydrogen production rate under different irradiation conditions is given in Figure 10B.

6.2. Wastewater Treatment

Since the beginning of the 21st century, the problem of water pollution has become increasingly severe, and it has become a major issue affecting human health that restricts the harmonious development of society. One of the main symptoms of water pollution is industrial wastewater. Industrial wastewater often includes oil substances, reaction aids, paper stocks, acids and alkaline substances, fiber impurities, dyes, and inorganic salt substances. Industrial wastewater is generally difficult to degrade. Today, methods for decomposing industrial wastewater are mainly biological methods, chemical methods, and physical methods. However, the above three methods do not clean the waste water completely—they all have some drawbacks.
In 1977, Frank et al. applied photocatalytic technology to the degradation of pollutants in water systems [340], laying the foundation for the use of photocatalytic oxidation technology in pollutant treatment. In the photocatalytic degradation of water pollution, active substances such as H+, H2O2, and ·OH generated by photocatalysts have a strong oxidizing activity and can deeply oxidize most of the organic pollutants in water into harmless small molecules. Therefore, a photocatalyt can be used for the purification of wastewater containing organic pollutants. Photocatalysis technology as a new high-efficiency and energy-saving modern sewage treatment technology has many advantages in wastewater treatment [341,342,343,344,345,346,347,348,349,350,351,352]. Compared to the traditional wastewater treatment method, photocatalytic technology can fundamentally remove pollutants, and, regardless of the pollutants’ liquid or gaseous state, photocatalytic technology can have a good degradation effect.
In 2001, Houas et al. [351] used methylene blue to simulate environmental wastewater. Their experimental results showed that titanium dioxide based photocatalysts can successfully degrade methylene blue. Lachheb et al. [352] used UV light to irradiate a titanium dioxide photocatalyst to achieve the degradation of five different dyes (alizarin S, crocein orange G, methyl red, Congo red, and methylene blue). Experimental results showed that the five dyes not only decolorized successfully but also completely decomposed. Liu et al. [174] prepared flexible composite Fe2O3/TiO2 nanofibers by combining a traditional electrospinning method and calcination process, which they successfully applied to photocatalytic wastewater treatment and photocurrent detection. In the photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine B experiment, Fe2O3/TiO2 nanofibers have higher photocatalytic activity than pure TiO2 under UV and visible light. The most important thing is that the Fe2O3/TiO2 photocatalyst can be recovered by magnetic materials, thereby avoiding secondary pollution to the environment after photocatalytic treatment. Zhang et al. [167] synthesized flexible rime-like branched TiO2/PVDF composites via the electrospinning method and the hydrothermal method. In the photolysis rhodamine B experiments, the prepared flexible TiO2/PVDF composites showed a higher photocatalytic efficiency than pure PVDF. In particular, the TiO2/PVDF(H10) composite treated for 10 h in the hydrothermal reaction showed the highest photocatalytic activity (as show in Figure 11A). As shown in Figure 11B, the TiO2/PVDF(H10) composite still maintains its high photocatalytic efficiency after five photocatalytic experiments.
Regmi et al. [353] synthesized Ni-doped BiVO4 photocatalysts using the microwave hydrothermal method. In the photocatalytic degradation experiments, the Ni-doped BiVO4 photocatalyst showed better photocatalytic performance than pure BiVO4. As shown in Figure 12, pure BiVO4 has a strong absorption in the UV to 510 nm range, while the absorption edge of Ni-doped samples is significantly red-shifted as the Ni dopant concentration increases. In Figure 13, Regmi and coworkers evaluated the photocatalytic disinfection activity of BiVO4 and Ni-doped BiVO4 by inactivating Escherichia coli in an aqueous buffer solution under different light sources. The results show that pure BiVO4 and 1 wt% Ni-doped BiVO4 require only 1 h to inactivate E. coli to 100% under full spectrum sunlight illumination. However, after visible light irradiation for 5 h, the inactivation rate of pure BiVO4 against E. coli reaches 72%, while the 3 wt% and 1 wt% Ni-doped BiVO4 against E. coli inactivation rate of is 89% and 92%, respectively. Obviously, 1 wt% Ni-doped BiVO4 shows higher efficiency, and as the doping amount of Ni increases the inactivation rate of E. coli gradually decreases.
Cai et al. [354,355] developed a simple two-step method to prepare three-dimensional ordered macroporous (3DOM) gold-loaded TiO2 photonic crystal photocatalysts. Based on this method, following the procedures shown in Figure 14A, i-TiO2-o and i-Au–TiO2-o photocatalysts were further generated. Both i-TiO2-o and i-Au–TiO2-o films prepared by this method exhibit a highly ordered interconnected porous structure, which is advantageous for the adsorption of target contaminants and utilization of solar energy. In the decomposition experiments of benzoic acid (BA), both i-TiO2-o and i-Au–TiO2-o showed higher decomposition rates than anatase TiO2. As shown in Figure 14B, under ultraviolet irradiation, the decomposition rate of BA by i-Au–TiO2-o is five or more times the decomposition rate of BA by anatase-type TiO2.

6.3. Photocatalytic Disinfection

As well as non-biological contaminants such as organic pesticides, antibiotics, and heavy metals in water, the harm caused by biological pollution such as medical sewage and domestic wastewater cannot be underestimated. Most pathogenic microorganisms can cause harm to human health by ingestion, respiration, or skin contact. According to the report, millions of people are dying or dead as a result of infection with pathogens annually [356].
Traditional sterilization methods for disinfection such as chlorination, ozonation, and ultraviolet light all have disadvantages. Chlorine can kill most bacteria and viruses, but the chlorine byproducts generated during the reaction can also endanger human health. Ozone oxidation technology is highly demanding on equipment and complicated to operate. Low-pressure ultraviolet disinfection can only inactivate bacteria on the surface of sewage; at the same time, the equipment is poor in reliability and expensive. For the first time, Matsunaga et al. [357] demonstrated that photocatalytic technology can eliminate pathogens including Lactobacillus, yeast, and Escherichia coli. Thereafter, photocatalytic antibacterial materials have been gradually known and developed.
In the past few decades, the photocatalytic technology of nanomaterials has been rapidly developed in solar photocatalytic sterilization and other aspects [358,359,360,361,362,363,364,365,366,367]. The reaction mechanism of photocatalytic sterilization is to destroy the cell wall and oxidize coenzyme A enzymes and genetic material. Under ultraviolet light irradiation, ·OH radicals and O2− radicals generated on the surface of the photocatalyst easily adhere to the cell wall surface of the bacteria. These free radicals can cause the leakage of K+ ions in the cell fluid, the oxidation of coenzyme A in the cell, or the destruction of the DNA double helix structure. There is also a class of photocatalysts that do not produce active ·OH during photocatalytic and antimicrobial processes, and this type of photocatalyst sterilizes pathogens using photogenerated holes. As a new sterilization method, photocatalytic sterilization has the advantages of high safety, strong stability, and wide antibacterial properties, and it demonstrates broad application prospects.
Obuchi et al. [368] obtained TiO2/SiO2 and Ag–TiO2/SiO2 photocatalysts by hydrolysis and the calcination method. Figure 15 shows the survival rate of spore-forming Bacillus subtilis to treatment time under UV irradiation and dark conditions and the relationship between the doping amount of Ag and the disinfection rate constant, respectively. Figure 15A shows that the viability of sporulated Bacillus subtilis reduced only when using Ag–TiO2/SiO2 under ultraviolet irradiation. As shown in Figure 15B, the optimum range of the Ag doping amount is 0.5–1.0 wt%.

6.4. Air Purification

Air quality is closely related to the health of human beings. In recent years, researchers have agreed that air pollution is closely related to respiratory infections, lung diseases, cardiovascular disease, and coronary heart disease [68,69,70,71,72,73,369,370,371,372]. To date, the main sources of air pollution are industrial waste gas and automobile exhaust gas. Sulfur compounds such as sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, halogen-containing compounds, and malodorous gases contained in industrial exhaust gases, as well as carbon monoxide, nitrogen oxides, and sulfur oxygen compounds in automotive exhaust gases, have a significant impact on people’s health. Another major pollutant is volatile organic compounds (VOCs). VOCs are organic pollutants widely found in indoor and outdoor air. VOCs are precursors of PM 2.5 and also are the most important air pollutants after PM 2.5 [373,374].
With the development of photocatalysis, the use of photocatalysts to decompose air pollutants has received increasing attention from researchers [375,376,377,378,379,380,381,382]. Photocatalytic material could adsorb or decompose toxic gases in the atmosphere, reducing the adverse effects of toxic gases on the environment. Semiconductor photocatalysis is mild, and the reaction process is relatively simple. In theory, photocatalysis can degrade almost all air pollutants. Therefore, compared with conventional methods such as filtration, adsorption, plasma, and ozone oxidation, photocatalytic technology can completely degrade the pollutants in the air under sunshine, thereby rapidly purifying the air.
Photocatalysis is a technology with wide applications and great development potential. As shown in Figure 16, in addition to the above four applications, photocatalytic technology is also widely used in agriculture, construction, automobiles, roads, and household appliances.

7. Summary and Outlook

In summary, the study on photocatalytic technology has developed for decades and has achieved substantial breakthrough in theory and a series of practical application results. Due to the simple photocatalysis oxidation equipment, easy control of operating conditions, strong oxidizing ability, no secondary pollution, and its broad applications in photocatalytic hydrogen production, the degradation of sewage, sterilization, and the purification of air, it has become a highly promising technology. In this review, the mechanism and application of photocatalyst technology, classification, modification, etc. have been summarized in detail. To date, the development of photocatalytic technology is far from meeting the demand for industrialization for many reasons. The photocatalyst prepared at this stage has several disadvantages such as the low utilization of sunlight, low quantum efficiency, low recyclability, and low photocatalyst efficiency. Therefore, researchers still need to devote more efforts to find a highly efficient and stable visible light photocatalyst in order to improve photocatalytic efficiency and promote the application of photocatalytic technology.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51,673,103) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51,703,102). Z.C. is grateful for the support from the joint French-Singaporean MERLION program (Grant No. R279,000,334,133).

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51,703,102).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Full NameAbbreviation
Valence bandVB
Conduction bandCB
Direct-current power supplyDC power supply
Physical vapor depositionPVD
Chemical vapor depositionCVD
Molecular beam epitaxyMBE
RF magnetron sputteringRF-MS
Ultraviolet irradiationUV irradiation
Methyl orangeMB
Rhodamine BRhB
Escherichia coliE. coli
Benzoic acidBA
Volatile organic compoundsVOCs

References

  1. Brunekreef, B.; Holgate, S.T. Air pollution and health. Lancet 2002, 360, 1233–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Fujishima, A.; Honda, K. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 1972, 238, 37–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Frank, S.N.; Bard, A.J. Semiconductor electrodes. II. Electrochemistry at n-type titanium dioxide electrodes in acetonitrile solutions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1975, 97, 7427–7433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Horie, Y.; David, D.A.; Taya, M.; Tone, S. Effects of light intensity and titanium dioxide concentration on photocatalytic sterilization rates of microbial cells. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 34, 3920–3926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jin, C.; Liu, X.; Tan, L.; Cui, Z.; Yang, X.; Zheng, Y.; Yeung, K.; Chu, P.K.; Wu, S. Ag/AgBr-loaded mesoporous silica for rapid sterilization and promotion of wound healing. Biomater. Sci. 2018, 6, 1735–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Rong, W.; Zhang, W.; Zhu, W.; Yan, L.; Li, S.; Kai, C.; Na, H.; Suo, Y.; Wang, J. Enhanced visible-light-driven photocatalytic sterilization of tungsten trioxide by surface-engineering oxygen vacancy and carbon matrix. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 348, 292–300. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, Q.; Guo, B.; Yu, J.; Ran, J.; Zhang, B.; Yan, H.; Gong, J.R. Highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production of CdS-cluster-decorated graphene nanosheets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 10878–10884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Chu, J.; Han, X.; Yu, Z.; Du, Y.; Song, B.; Xu, P. Highly efficient visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production on CdS/Cu7S4/g-C3N4 ternary heterostructures. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 20404–20411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, R.; Shuang, N.; Gang, L.; Xu, X. Hollow CaTiO3 cubes modified by La/Cr co-doping for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 225, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wei, R.B.; Huang, Z.L.; Gu, G.H.; Zhu, W.; Zeng, L.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Z.Q. Dual-cocatalysts decorated rimous cds spheres advancing highly-efficient visible-light photocatalytic hydrogen production. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 231, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, H.; Lin, J.; Li, Z.; Li, T.; Jia, X.; Wu, X.L.; Hu, S.; Lin, H.; Chen, J.; Zhu, J. Organic dye doped graphitic carbon nitride with a tailored electronic structure for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 502–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liu, Q.; Zhou, Y.; Kou, J.; Chen, X.; Tian, Z.; Gao, J.; Yan, S.; Zou, Z. High-yield synthesis of ultralong and ultrathin Zn2GeO4 nanoribbons toward improved photocatalytic reduction of CO2 into renewable hydrocarbon fuel. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 14385–14387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Chen, L.; Qin, Y.; Chen, G.; Li, M.; Cai, L.; Qiu, Y.; Fan, H.; Robert, M.; Lau, T.C. A molecular noble metal-free system for efficient visible light-driven reduction of CO2 to CO. Dalton Trans. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Tan, W.; Cao, B.; Xiao, W.; Zhang, M.; Wang, S.; Xie, S.; Xie, D.; Cheng, F.; Guo, Q.; Liu, P. Electrochemical reduction of CO2 on hollow cubic Cu2O@Au nanocomposites. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 63–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Vidyasagar, D.; Manwar, N.; Gupta, A.; Ghugal, S.G.; Umare, S.S.; Boukherroub, R. Phenyl-grafted carbon nitride semiconductor for photocatalytic CO2-reduction and rapid degradation of organic dyes. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 822–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hofstadler, K.; Bauer, R.; Novalic, S.; Heisler, G. New reactor design for photocatalytic wastewater treatment with TiO2 immobilized on fused-silica glass fibers: Photomineralization of 4-chlorophenol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1994, 28, 670–674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, F.B.; Li, X.Z. Photocatalytic properties of gold/gold ion-modified titanium dioxide for wastewater treatment. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2002, 228, 15–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Choi, H.; Stathatos, E.; Dionysiou, D.D. Photocatalytic TiO2 films and membranes for the development of efficient wastewater treatment and reuse systems. Desalination 2007, 202, 199–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Vaiano, V.; Iervolino, G. Facile method to immobilize ZnO particles on glass spheres for the photocatalytic treatment of tannery wastewater. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2018, 518, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Betancourt-Buitrago, L.A.; Ossa-Echeverry, O.E.; Rodriguez-Vallejo, J.C.; Barraza, J.M.; Marriaga, N.; Machuca-Martínez, F. Anoxic photocatalytic treatment of synthetic mining wastewater using TiO2 and scavengers for complexed cyanide recovery. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2019, 18, 853–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fu, X.; Zeltner, W.A.; Anderson, M.A. Applications in photocatalytic purification of air. Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal. 1997, 103, 445–461. [Google Scholar]
  22. Besov, A.S.; Vorontsov, A.V.; Parmon, V.N. Fast adsorptive and photocatalytic purification of air from acetone and dimethyl methylphosphonate by TiO2 aerosol. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2009, 89, 602–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kako, T.; Ichihara, F.; Liu, G.; Meng, X.; Ye, J. Study on the enhancement of photocatalytic environment purification through ubiquitous-red-clay loading. SN Appl. Sci. 2019, 1, 138–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Boyjoo, Y.; Sun, H.; Liu, J.; Pareek, V.K.; Wang, S. A review on photocatalysis for air treatment: From catalyst development to reactor design. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 310, 537–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, W.; Tadé, M.O.; Shao, Z. Nitrogen-doped simple and complex oxides for photocatalysis: A review. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 92, 33–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Li, X.; Yu, J.; Wageh, S.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Xie, J. Graphene in photocatalysis: A review. Small 2016, 12, 6640–6696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhou, P.; Yu, J.; Jaroniec, A. All-solid-state Z-scheme photocatalytic systems. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 4920–4935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, W.; Li, G.; Xia, D.; An, T.; Zhao, H.; Wong, P.K. Photocatalytic nanomaterials for solar-driven bacterial inactivation: Recent progress and challenges. Environ. Sci. Nano 2017, 4, 782–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sayama, K.; Yase, K.; Arakawa, H.; Asakura, K.; Tanaka, A.; Domen, K.; Onishi, T. Photocatalytic activity and reaction mechanism of Pt-intercalated K4Nb6O17 catalyst on the water splitting in carbonate salt aqueous solution. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1998, 114, 125–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kawai, M.; Kawai, T.; Naito, S.; Tamaru, K. The mechanism of photocatalytic reaction over Pt/TiO2: Production of H2 and aldehyde from gaseous alcohol and water. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1984, 110, 58–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. And, J.S.; Rabani, J. Photocatalytic dechlorination of aqueous carbon tetrachloride solutions in TiO2 layer systems: A chain reaction mechanism. Z. Phys. Chem. 1998, 1, 313–318. [Google Scholar]
  32. Tan, T.T.Y.; Donia Beydoun, A.; Amal, R. Photocatalytic reduction of Se(vi) in aqueous solutions in UV/TiO2 system: Kinetic modeling and reaction mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 4296–4303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yamazaki, S.; Toshifumi Tanimura, A.; Yoshida, A.; Hori, K. Reaction mechanism of photocatalytic degradation of chlorinated ethylenes on porous TiO2 pellets: Cl radical-initiated mechanism. J. Phys. Chem. A 2004, 108, 5183–5188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Zhao, L.H.; Itoh, K.; Murabayashi, M. Reaction mechanism of photocatalytic oxidation of trichloroethylene on TiO2 film. Chin. J. Catal. 2004, 25, 915–919. [Google Scholar]
  35. Li, A.C.; Li, G.H.; Zheng, Y.; Feng, L.L.; Zheng, Y.J. Photocatalytic property and reaction mechanism of (Ni-Mo)/TiO2 nano thin film evaluated with congo red. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 2012, 28, 457–464. [Google Scholar]
  36. Moctezuma, E.; Leyva, E.; Aguilar, C.A.; Luna, R.A.; Montalvo, C. Photocatalytic degradation of paracetamol: Intermediates and total reaction mechanism. J. Hazard. Mater. 2012, 243, 130–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Nishikawa, M.; Mitani, Y.; Nosaka, Y. Photocatalytic reaction mechanism of Fe(III)-grafted TiO2 studied by means of ESR spectroscopy and chemiluminescence photometry. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 14900–14907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Liu, L.; Li, Y. Understanding the reaction mechanism of photocatalytic reduction of CO2 with H2O on TiO2-based photocatalysts: A review. Aerosol Air Qual. Res. 2014, 14, 453–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Guzman, M.I.; Martin, S.T. Oxaloacetate-to-malate conversion by mineral photoelectrochemistry: Implications for the viability of the reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle in prebiotic chemistry. Int. J. Astrobiol. 2008, 7, 271–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhou, R.; Guzman, M.I. CO2 reduction under periodic illumination of ZnS. J. Phys. Chem. C 2014, 118, 11649–11656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Kim, S.-J.; Lee, E.G.; Park, S.D.; Jeon, C.J.; Cho, Y.H.; Rhee, C.K.; Kim, W.W. Photocatalytic effects of rutile phase TiO2 ultrafine powder with high specific surface area obtained by a homogeneous precipitation process at low temperatures. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2001, 22, 63–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, C.; Han, X.; Xie, S.; Kuang, Q.; Wang, X.; Jin, M.; Xie, Z.; Zheng, L. Enhancing the photocatalytic activity of anatase TiO2 by improving the specific facet-induced spontaneous separation of photogenerated electrons and holes. Chemistry 2013, 8, 282–289. [Google Scholar]
  43. Kapinus, E.I.; Khalyavka, T.A.; Shimanovskaya, V.V.; Viktorova, T.I.; Strelko, V.V. Photocatalytic activity of spectro-pure titanium dioxide: Effects of crystalline structure, specific surface area and sorption properties. Int. J. Photoenergy 2014, 5, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Si, W.; Yang, Z.; Wang, X.; Lv, Q.; Huang, C. Fe, N-odoped graphdiyne displaying efficient oxygen reduction reaction activity. ChemSusChem 2018, 12, 173–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Ji-Lian, L.I. The influence factors of photocatalytic oxidation cyclohexance over nano-ZnFe2O4/SiO2. J. Dalian Coll. Educ. 2001, 17, 54–55. [Google Scholar]
  46. Barka, N.; Qourzal, S.; Assabbane, A.; Nounah, A.; Ait-Ichou, Y. Factors influencing the photocatalytic degradation of rhodamine b by TiO2-coated non-woven paper. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2008, 195, 346–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Liu, H.; Pei, S.; Liu, G.; Chen, Y. Study on the influencing factors of photocatalytic degradation of X-3B aqueous solution by TiO2 fibers. Acta Sci. Circumstantiae 2012, 32, 1054–1059. [Google Scholar]
  48. Hoque, M.; Guzman, M. Photocatalytic activity: Experimental features to report in heterogeneous photocatalysis. Materials 2011, 11, 1990–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Eggins, B.R.; Robertson, P.K.J.; Murphy, E.P.; Woods, E.; Irvine, J.T.S. Factors affecting the photoelectrochemical fixation of carbon dioxide with semiconductor colloids. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1998, 118, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guzman, M.I.; Martin, S.T. Photo-production of lactate from glyoxylate: How minerals can facilitate energy storage in a prebiotic world. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 2265–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Zhang, X.V.; Martin, S.T. Driving parts of krebs cycle in reverse through mineral photochemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 16032–16033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zhou, R.; Guzman, M.I. Photocatalytic reduction of fumarate to succinate on ZnS mineral surfaces. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 7349–7357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Fujishima, A.; Zhang, X.; Tryk, D.A. Tio photocatalysis and related surface phenomena. Surf. Sci. Rep. 2008, 63, 515–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Hashimoto, K.; Irie, H.; Fujishima, A. TiO2 photocatalysis: A historical overview and future prospects. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 44, 8269–8285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Sakthivel, S.; Kisch, H. Daylight photocatalysis by carbon-modified titanium dioxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2003, 42, 4908–4911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Linsebigler, A.L.; Lu, G.; Yates, J.T. Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces: Principles, mechanisms, and selected results. Chem. Rev. 1995, 95, 735–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fujishima, A.; Hashimoto, K.; Watanabe, T. TiO2 photocatalysis: Fundamentals and applications. In A Revolution in Cleaning Technology; BKC, Inc.: Tokyo, Japan, 1999; pp. 14–21. [Google Scholar]
  58. Woan, K.; Pyrgiotakis, G.; Sigmund, W. Photocatalytic carbon-nanotube–TiO2 composites. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 2233–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Jodat, A.; Jodat, A. Photocatalytic degradation of chloramphenicol and tartrazine using Ag/TiO2 nanoparticles. Desalin. Water Treat. 2014, 52, 2668–2677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Pan, J.H.; Cai, Z.; Yu, Y.; Zhao, X.S. Controllable synthesis of mesoporous f-TiO2 spheres for effective photocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 11430–11438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Mu, W.; Herrmann, J.-M.; Pichat, P. Room temperature photocatalytic oxidation of liquid cyclohexane into cyclohexanone over neat and modified TiO2. Catal. Lett. 1989, 3, 73–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Izumi, I.; Dunn, W.W.; Wilbourn, K.O.; Fan, F.R.F.; Bard, A.J. Heterogeneous photocatalytic oxidation of hydrocarbons on platinized titanium dioxide powders. J. Phys. Chem. 1980, 84, 3207–3210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Huang, M.; Yu, J.; Li, B.; Deng, C.; Wang, L.; Wu, W.; Dong, L.; Zhang, F.; Fan, M. Intergrowth and coexistence effects of TiO2–SnO2 nanocomposite with excellent photocatalytic activity. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 629, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gao, M.; Zhang, D.; Pu, X.; Ding, K.; Li, H.; Zhang, T.; Ma, H. Combustion synthesis of Bi/BiOCl composites with enhanced electron–hole separation and excellent visible light photocatalytic properties. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 149, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cabot, A.; Marsal, A.; Arbiol, J.; Morante, J.R. Bi2O3 as a selective sensing material for NO detection. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2004, 99, 74–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Sammes, N.M.; Tompsett, G.A.; Näfe, H.; Aldinger, F. Bismuth based oxide electrolytes—Structure and ionic conductivity. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 1999, 19, 1801–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Hameed, A.; Montini, T.; Gombac, V.; Fornasiero, P. Surface phases and photocatalytic activity correlation of Bi2O3/Bi2O4−x nanocomposite. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 9658–9659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Qian, X.; Yue, D.; Tian, Z.; Meng, R.; Zhu, Y.; Kan, M.; Zhang, T.; Zhao, Y. Carbon quantum dots decorated Bi2WO6 nanocomposite with enhanced photocatalytic oxidation activity for VOCs. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 193, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hu, Y.; Li, D.; Zheng, Y.; Chen, W.; He, Y.; Shao, Y.; Fu, X.; Xiao, G. BiVO4/TiO2 nanocrystalline heterostructure: A wide spectrum responsive photocatalyst towards the highly efficient decomposition of gaseous benzene. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2011, 104, 30–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wu, T.; Li, X.; Zhang, D.; Dong, F.; Chen, S. Efficient visible light photocatalytic oxidation of NO with hierarchical nanostructured 3d flower-like BiOClxBr1−x solid solutions. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 671, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Dong, F.; Xiong, T.; Yan, S.; Wang, H.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, H.; Wu, Z. Facets and defects cooperatively promote visible light plasmonic photocatalysis with Bi nanowires@BiOCl nanosheets. J. Catal. 2016, 344, 401–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Feng, J.; Huang, H.; Yu, S.; Dong, F.; Zhang, Y. A self-sacrifice template route to iodine modified BiOIO3: Band gap engineering and highly boosted visible-light active photoreactivity. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 7851–7859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Sun, Y.; Xiong, T.; Dong, F.; Huang, H.; Cen, W. Interlayer-I-doped BiOIO3 nanoplates with an optimized electronic structure for efficient visible light photocatalysis. Chem. Commun. 2016, 52, 8243–8246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Yu, S.; Huang, H.; Dong, F.; Li, M.; Tian, N.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Y. Synchronously achieving the plasmonic Bi metal deposition and I- doping by utilizing BiOIO3 as the self-sacrificing template for high-performance multi-functional applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 27925–27933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Ai, Z.; Ho, W.; Lee, S.; Zhang, L. Efficient photocatalytic removal of NO in indoor air with hierarchical bismuth oxybromide nanoplate microspheres under visible light. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2009, 43, 4143–4150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Dong, G.; Ho, W.; Zhang, L. Photocatalytic NO removal on BiOI surface: The change from nonselective oxidation to selective oxidation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 168–169, 490–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Zhou, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Q.; Dong, F.; Wang, F.; Xiong, Z. Role of graphene on the band structure and interfacial interaction of Bi2WO6/graphene composites with enhanced photocatalytic oxidation of NO. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 16623–16631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Huang, Y.; Ai, Z.; Ho, W.; Chen, M.; Lee, S. Ultrasonic spray pyrolysis synthesis of porous Bi2WO6 microspheres and their visible-light-induced photocatalytic removal of NO. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 6342–6349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhao, Z.; Zhang, W.; Sun, Y.; Yu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, H.; Dong, F.; Wu, Z. Bi cocatalyst/Bi2MoO6 microspheres nanohybrid with SPR-promoted visible-light photocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 2016, 120, 11889–11898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Huang, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhang, Q.; Cao, J.J.; Huang, R.J.; Ho, W.; Lee, S.C. In situ fabrication of α-Bi2O3/(BiO)2CO3 nanoplate heterojunctions with tunable optical property and photocatalytic activity. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 23435–23443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Xiong, T.; Wen, M.; Dong, F.; Yu, J.; Han, L.; Lei, B.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, X.; Zang, Z. Three dimensional Z-scheme (BiO)2CO3/MoS2 with enhanced visible light photocatalytic No removal. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 199, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Feng, X.; Zhang, W.; Deng, H.; Ni, Z.; Dong, F.; Zhang, Y. Efficient visible light photocatalytic NOx removal with cationic ag clusters-grafted (BiO)2CO3 hierarchical superstructures. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 322, 223–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Xiong, T.; Dong, X.A.; Huang, H.; Cen, W.; Zhang, Y.; Dong, F. Single precursor mediated-synthesis of bi semimetal deposited n-doped (BiO)2CO3 superstructures for highly promoted photocatalysis. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 2969–2979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Dong, F.; Li, P.; Zhong, J.; Liu, X.; Zhang, Y.; Cen, W.; Huang, H. Simultaneous Pd2+ doping and Pd metal deposition on (BiO)2CO3 microspheres for enhanced and stable visible light photocatalysis. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2016, 510, 161–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kim, H.G.; Hwang, D.W.; Lee, J.S. An undoped, single-phase oxide photocatalyst working under visible light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 8912–8913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Papp, J.; Shen, H.S.; Kershaw, R.; Dwight, K.; Wold, A. Titanium(IV) oxide photocatalysts with palladium. Chem. Mater. 1993, 5, 284–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Amano, F.; Yamakata, A.; Nogami, K.; Osawa, M.; Ohtani, B. Visible light responsive pristine metal oxide photocatalyst: Enhancement of activity by crystallization under hydrothermal treatment. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008, 130, 17650–17651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Kroll, V.; Swaan, H.; Lacombe, S.; Mirodatos, C. Methane reforming reaction with carbon dioxide over Ni/SiO2 catalyst: II. A mechanistic study. J. Catal. 1996, 164, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Du, W.P.; Li, Z.; Leng, W.H.; Xu, Y.M. Photocatalytic reduction of silver ions on ferric oxides and ferric hydroxides. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 2009, 25, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar]
  90. Sun, Z.; Li, L.; Yang, H.; Zhou, D.; Li, H. Photocatalytic reduction of silver ion probe on nano titanium dioxide. J. Xinyang Norm. Univ. 2016, 29, 79–83. [Google Scholar]
  91. Zare, K. Study of photooxidative degradation of reactive dyes from aqueous solutions by UV/ C102 process. J. Phys. Theor. Chem. 2006, 3, 51–62. [Google Scholar]
  92. Ercan, Ö.; Deniz, S.; Yetimoğlu, E.K.; Aydın, A. Degradation of reactive dyes using advanced oxidation method. Clean Soil Air Water 2015, 43, 1031–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Jablonski, M.R.; Ranicke, H.B. Novel photo-fenton oxidation with sand and carbon filtration of high concentration reactive dyes both with and without biodegradation. J. Text. Sci. Eng. 2016, 6, 2–17. [Google Scholar]
  94. And, K.M.; Domen, K. New non-oxide photocatalysts designed for overall water splitting under visible light. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 7851–7861. [Google Scholar]
  95. Sato, J.; Saito, N.; Yamada, Y.; Maeda, K.; Takata, T.; Kondo, J.N.; Hara, M.; Kobayashi, H.; Domen, K.; Inoue, Y. RuO2-loaded β-Ge3N4 as a non-oxide photocatalyst for overall water splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4150–4151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Cheng, J.; Pan, Y.; Zhu, J.; Li, Z.; Pan, J.; Ma, Z. Hybrid network cus monolith cathode materials synthesized via facile in situ melt-diffusion for Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2014, 257, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Chang, L.; He, X.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Y. Mercaptophenylboronic acid-capped Mn-doped ZnS quantum dots for highly selective and sensitive fluorescence detection of glycoproteins. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 243, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhang, X.V.; Ellery, S.P.; Friend, C.M.; Holland, H.D.; Michel, F.M.; Schoonen, M.A.; Martin, S.T. Photodriven reduction and oxidation reactions on colloidal semiconductor particles: Implications for prebiotic synthesis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2007, 185, 301–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Khanchandani, S.; Kundu, S.; Patra, A.; Ganguli, A.K. Shell thickness dependent photocatalytic properties of ZnO/CdS core–shell nanorods. J. Phys. Chem. C 2012, 116, 23653–23662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kudo, A.; Miseki, Y. Heterogeneous photocatalyst materials for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009, 38, 253–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zheng, N.-C.; Ouyang, T.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Z.; Chen, D.-Y.; Liu, Z.-Q. Ultrathin CdS shell-sensitized hollow s-doped CeO2 spheres for efficient visible-light photocatalysis. Catal. Sci. Technol. 2019, 9, 1357–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Li, X.; Wen, J.; Low, J.; Fang, Y.; Yu, J. Design and fabrication of semiconductor photocatalyst for photocatalytic reduction of CO2 to solar fuel. Sci. China Mater. 2014, 57, 70–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Xu, Y.; Schoonen, M.A.A. The absolute energy positions of conduction and valence bands of selected semiconducting minerals. Am. Miner. 2000, 85, 543–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Córdova, R.; Gómez, H.; Schrebler, R.; Cury, P.; Orellana, M.; Grez, P.; Leinen, D.; Río, R.D. Electrosynthesis and electrochemical characterization of a thin phase of CuxS (x→2) on ITO electrode. Langmuir 2002, 18, 8647–8654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Wen, P.L.; Ling, C.T.W.; Ang, S.; Yee Low, H. Phase-selective synthesis of copper sulfide nanocrystals. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 6170–6177. [Google Scholar]
  106. Erokhina, S.; Erokhin, V.; Nicolini, C. Microstructure origin of the conductivity differences in aggregated CuS films of different thickness. Langmuir 2003, 19, 766–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Gorai, S.; Ganguli, D.; Chaudhuri, S. Synthesis of copper sulfides of varying morphologies and stoichiometries controlled by chelating and nonchelating solvents in a solvothermal process. Cryst. Growth Des. 2013, 5, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Bessekhouad, Y.; Robert, D.; Weber, J.V. Bi2S3/TiO2 and CdS/TiO2 heterojunctions as an available configuration for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutant. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2004, 163, 569–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Mills, A.; O’Rourke, C.; Moore, K. Powder semiconductor photocatalysis in aqueous solution: An overview of kinetics-based reaction mechanisms. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2015, 310, 66–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kanemoto, M.; Shiragami, T.; Pac, C.; Yanagida, S.; Kanemoto, M.; Shiragami, T.; Pac, C. Semiconductor photocatalysis. Effective photoreduction of carbon dioxide catalyzed by ZnS quantum crystallites with low density of surface defects. J. Phys. Chem. 1992, 96, 3521–3526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhang, H.; Gilbert, B.; Huang, F.; Banfield, J.F. Water-driven structure transformation in nanoparticles at room temperature. Nature 2003, 424, 1025–1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Henglein, A.; Gutierrez, M.; Fischer, C.H. Photochemistry of colloidal metal sulfides 6. Kinetics of interfacial reactions at ZnS-particles. Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. 1984, 88, 170–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Xu, J.F.; Ji, W.; Lin, J.Y.; Tang, S.H.; Du, Y.W. Preparation of ZnS nanoparticles by ultrasonic radiation method. Appl. Phys. A 1998, 66, 639–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Lenggoro, I.W.; Okuyama, K.; Mora, J.F.D.L.; Tohge, N. Preparation of ZnS nanoparticles by electrospray pyrolysis. J. Aerosol. Sci. 2000, 31, 121–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Suliman, A.E.; Tang, Y.; Liang, X. Preparation of ZnO nanoparticles and nanosheets and their application to dye-sensitized solar cells. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. C 2007, 91, 1658–1662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Reddy, P.L.; Deshmukh, K.; Chidambaram, K.; Ali, M.M.N.; Sadasivuni, K.K.; Kumar, Y.R.; Lakshmipathy, R.; Pasha, S.K.K. Dielectric properties of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) nanocomposites filled with green synthesized zinc sulphide (ZnS) nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Johne, P.; Kisch, H. Photoreduction of carbon dioxide catalysed by free and supported zinc and cadmium sulphide powders. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1997, 111, 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Moore, D.F.; Ding, Y.; Wang, Z.L. Crystal orientation-ordered ZnS nanowire bundles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 14372–14373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Hsu, Y.J.; Lu, S.Y. One-step preparation of coaxial CdS-ZnS nanowires. Chem. Commun. 2004, 15, 2102–2103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Xu, X.J.; Fei, G.T.; Yu, W.H.; Wang, X.W.; Chen, L.; Zhang, L.D. Preparation and formation mechanism of ZnS semiconductor nanowires made by the electrochemical deposition method. Nanotechnology 2006, 17, 426–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Guo-Ping, L.I. Hydrothermal preparation of ZnS nanowires. Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 23, 1864–1868. [Google Scholar]
  122. Khanlary, M.R.; Alijarahi, S.; Reyhani, A. Growth temperature dependence of VLS-grown ultra-long ZnS nanowires prepared by CVD method. J. Theor. Appl. Phys. 2018, 12, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  123. Wang, Z.L.; Wang, X.; Gao, P.; Li, J.; Summers, C.J. Rectangular porous ZnO-ZnS nanocables and ZnS nanotubes. Adv. Mater. 2002, 14, 1732–1735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Lv, R.T.; Cao, C.B.; Guo, Y.J.; Zhu, H.S. Preparation of ZnS nanotubes via surfactant micelle-template inducing reaction. J. Mater. Sci. 2004, 39, 1575–1578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Kim, M.R.; Ahn, S.J.; Jang, D.J. Preparation and characterization of titania/ZnS core-shell nanotubes. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2006, 6, 180–184. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  126. Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Cao, H.; Wang, L.; Wan, Z.; Hao, Y.; Wang, X. Facile preparation of ZnS/CdS core/shell nanotubes and their enhanced photocatalytic performance. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2017, 42, 17394–17402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Fang, X.-S.; Ye, C.-H.; Peng, X.-S.; Wang, Y.-H.; Wu, Y.-C.; Zhang, L.-D. Large-scale synthesis of ZnS nanosheets by the evaporation of ZnS nanopowders. J. Cryst. Growth 2004, 263, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Srinivasan, N.; Thirumaran, S.; Ciattini, S. Preparation of ZnS nanosheets from (2,2′-bipyridine)bis(1,2,3,4-tetrahydroquinolinecarbodithioato-S,S′)zinc(II). Spectrochim. Acta A 2013, 102, 263–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Wu, Q.; Cao, H.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, X.; Rabinovich, D. Generation and optical properties of monodisperse wurtzite-type ZnS microspheres. Inorg. Chem. 2006, 45, 7316–7322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Shi, Y.; Chen, J.; Shen, P. ZnS micro-spheres and flowers: Chemically controlled synthesis and template use in fabricating MS (shell)/ZnS (core) and MS (M = Pb, Cu) hollow microspheres. J. Alloys Compd. 2007, 441, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Hu, J.S.; Ren, L.L.; Guo, Y.G.; Liang, H.P.; Cao, A.M.; Dr, L.J.W.; Dr, C.L.B. Mass production and high photocatalytic activity of ZnS nanoporous nanoparticles. Angew. Chem. 2010, 44, 1269–1273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Zhang, J.; Liu, S.; Yu, J.; Jaroniec, M. A simple cation exchange approach to Bi-doped ZnS hollow spheres with enhanced UV and visible-light photocatalytic H2-production activity. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 14655–14662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Zhang, J.; Yu, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, Q.; Gong, J.R. Visible light photocatalytic H2-production activity of CuS/ZnS porous nanosheets based on photoinduced interfacial charge transfer. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 4774–4779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Zhang, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Lin, Z.; Huang, F.; Yu, J. Enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen production activities of Au-loaded ZnS flowers. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2013, 5, 1031–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Liu, A.Y.; Cohen, M.L. Prediction of new low compressibility solids. Science 1989, 245, 841–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Niu, C.; Lu, Y.Z.; Lieber, C.M. Experimental realization of the covalent solid carbon nitride. Science 1993, 261, 334–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Cao, S.; Low, J.; Yu, J.; Jaroniec, M. Polymeric photocatalysts based on graphitic carbon nitride. Adv. Mater. 2015, 46, 2150–2176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Teter, D.M.; Hemley, R.J. Low-compressibility carbon nitrides. Science 1996, 271, 53–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Wang, X.; Maeda, K.; Thomas, A.; Takanabe, K.; Xin, G.; Carlsson, J.M.; Domen, K.; Antonietti, M. A metal-free polymeric photocatalyst for hydrogen production from water under visible light. Nat. Mater. 2009, 8, 76–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Fina, F.; Callear, S.K.; Carins, G.M.; Irvine, J.T.S. Structural investigation of graphitic carbon nitride via xrd and neutron diffraction. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 2612–2618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Wang, X.; Maeda, K.; Chen, X.; Takanabe, K.; Domen, K.; Hou, Y.; Fu, X.; Antonietti, M. Polymer semiconductors for artificial photosynthesis: Hydrogen evolution by mesoporous graphitic carbon nitride with visible light. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2009, 131, 1680–1681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Antonietti, M. Polymeric graphitic carbon nitride as a heterogeneous organocatalyst: From photochemistry to multipurpose catalysis to sustainable chemistry. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 68–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Zhu, J.; Xiao, P.; Li, H.; Carabineiro, S.A. Graphitic carbon nitride: Synthesis, properties, and applications in catalysis. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 16449–16465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Cui, Y.; Tang, Y.; Wang, X. Template-free synthesis of graphitic carbon nitride hollow spheres for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. Mater. Lett. 2015, 161, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Maeda, K.; Kuriki, R.; Zhang, M.; Wang, X.; Ishitani, O. The effect of the pore-wall structure of carbon nitride on photocatalytic CO2 reduction under visible light. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 15146–15151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Wang, W.; Yu, J.C.; Xia, D.; Wong, P.K.; Li, Y. Graphene and g-C3N4 nanosheets cowrapped elemental α-sulfur as a novel metal-free heterojunction photocatalyst for bacterial inactivation under visible-light. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2013, 47, 8724–8732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Lv, Q.; Si, W.; He, J.; Sun, L.; Zhang, C.; Wang, N.; Yang, Z.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Deng, W. Selectively nitrogen-doped carbon materials as superior metal-free catalysts for oxygen reduction. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 3376–3386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Liu, H.; Zhang, Z.-G.; He, H.-W.; Wang, X.-X.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q.-Q.; Tong, Y.-F.; Liu, H.-L.; Ramakrishna, S.; Yan, S.-Y. One-step synthesis heterostructured g-C3N4/TiO2 composite for rapid degradation of pollutants in utilizing visible light. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Ward, M.D.; White, J.R.; Bard, A.J. Electrochemical investigation of the energetics of particulate titanium dioxide photocatalysts. The methyl viologen-acetate system. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1983, 105, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Gunti, S. Enhanced Visible Light Photocatalytic Remediation of Organics in Water Using Zinc Oxide and Titanium Oxide Nanostructures. 2017. Available online: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/6852/ (accessed on 16 September 2018).
  151. Jongh, P.E.D.; Vanmaekelbergh, D.; Kelly, J.J. Cu2O: A catalyst for the photochemical decomposition of water? Chem. Commun. 1999, 12, 1069–1070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Finlayson, M.F.; Wheeler, B.L.; Kakuta, N.; Park, K.H.; Bard, A.J.; Campion, A.; Fox, M.A.; Webber, S.E.; White, J.M. Determination of flat-band position of cadmium sulfide crystals, films, and powders by photocurrent and impedance techniques, photoredox reaction mediated by intragap states. J. Phys. Chem. 1985, 89, 5676–5681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; Takanabe, K.; Maeda, K.; Domen, K.; Epping, J.D.; Fu, X.; Antonietti, M.; Wang, X. Synthesis of a carbon nitride structure for visible-light catalysis by copolymerization. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010, 49, 441–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Yan, S.C.; Lv, S.B.; Li, Z.S.; Zou, Z.G. Organic-inorganic composite photocatalyst of g-C3N4 and TaON with improved visible light photocatalytic activities. Dalton Trans. 2010, 39, 1488–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Chun, W.J.; Ishikawa, A.; Fujisawa, H.; Takata, T.; Kondo, J.N.; Hara, M.; Kawai, M.; Matsumoto, Y.; Domen, K. Conduction and valence band positions of Ta2O5, TaON, and Ta3N5 by ups and electrochemical methods. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 34, 1798–1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Memar, A.; Chi, M.P.; Tade, M.O. Influence of surfactants on Fe2O3 nanostructure photoanode. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 16835–16843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Li, Z.Q.; Chen, X.T.; Xue, Z.L. Microwave-assisted synthesis and photocatalytic properties of flower-like Bi2WO6 and Bi2O3-Bi2WO6 composite. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2013, 394, 69–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  158. Kisch, H. Visible light induced photoelectrochemical properties of n-BiVO4 and n-BiVO4/p-Co3O4. J. Phys. Chem. C 2008, 112, 548–554. [Google Scholar]
  159. Hardee, K.L.; Bard, A.J. Semiconductor electrodes. X. Photoelectrochemical behavior of several polycrystalline metal oxide electrodes in aqueous solutions. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1977, 124, 215–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Yi, Z.; Ye, J.; Kikugawa, N.; Kako, T.; Ouyang, S.; Stuartwilliams, H.; Yang, H.; Cao, J.; Luo, W.; Li, Z. An orthophosphate semiconductor with photooxidation properties under visible-light irradiation. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9, 559–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Doshi, J.; Reneker, D.H. Electrospinning process and applications of electrospun fibers. J. Electrostat. 1995, 35, 151–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Huang, Z.M.; Zhang, Y.Z.; Kotaki, M.; Ramakrishna, S. A review on polymer nanofibers by electrospinning and their applications in nanocomposites. Comp. Sci. Technol. 2003, 63, 2223–2253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Greiner, A.; Wendorff, J.H. Electrospinning: A fascinating method for the preparation of ultrathin fibers. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2007, 46, 5670–5703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Sill, T.J.; Recum, H.A.V. Electrospinning: Applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2008, 29, 1989–2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Bhardwaj, N.; Kundu, S.C. Electrospinning: A fascinating fiber fabrication technique. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28, 325–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Li, D.; Xia, Y. Electrospinning of nanofibers: Reinventing the wheel? Adv. Mater. 2010, 16, 1151–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Zhang, Z.G.; Liu, H.; Zhang, B.; Zhang, J.; Liu, R.Z.; Ning, X.; Long, Y.Z. Synthesis and application of highly ordered arrays of TiO2 rods grown on electrospun PVDF fibers. Mater. Res. Express 2017, 4, 075907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Liu, H.; Zhang, Z.G.; Wang, X.X.; Nie, G.D.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, S.X.; Cao, N.; Yan, S.Y.; Long, Y.Z. Highly flexible Fe2O3/TiO2 composite nanofibers for photocatalysis and utraviolet detection. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2018, 121, 236–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Liu, Y.J.; Zhang, H.D.; Zhang, J.; Li, S.; Zhang, J.C.; Zhu, J.W.; Gong, M.G.; Wang, X.X.; Long, Y.Z.; Liu, Y.J. Effects of ce doping and humidity on UV sensing properties of electrospun ZnO nanofibers. J. Appl. Phys. 2017, 122, 105102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Zhang, H.-D.; Liu, Y.-J.; Zhang, J.; Zhu, J.-W.; Qin, Q.-H.; Zhao, C.-Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, J.-C.; Long, Y.-Z. Electrospun ZnO/SiO2 hybrid nanofibers for flexible pressure sensor. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2018, 51, 085102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zhang, Z.-G.; Liu, H.; Wang, X.-X.; Zhang, J.; Yu, M.; Ramakrishna, S.; Long, Y.-Z. One-step low temperature hydrothermal synthesis of flexible TiO2/PVDF@MoS2 core-shell heterostructured fibers for visible-light-driven photocatalysis and self-cleaning. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  172. Wang, X.; Song, W.-Z.; You, M.-H.; Zhang, J.; Yu, M.; Fan, Z.; Ramakrishna, S.; Long, Y.-Z. Bionic single-electrode electronic skin unit based on piezoelectric nanogenerator. ACS Nano 2018, 12, 8588–8596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Chen, S.; Liu, G.-S.; He, H.-W.; Zhou, C.-F.; Yan, X.; Zhang, J.-C. Physical structure induced hydrophobicity analyzed from electrospinning and coating polyvinyl butyral films. Adv. Condens. Matter Phys. 2019, 2019, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Liu, G.-S.; Yan, X.; Yan, F.-F.; Chen, F.-X.; Hao, L.-Y.; Chen, S.-J.; Lou, T.; Ning, X.; Long, Y.-Z. In situ electrospinning iodine-based fibrous meshes for antibacterial wound dressing. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2018, 13, 309–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Yan, X.; You, M.-H.; Lou, T.; Yu, M.; Zhang, J.-C.; Gong, M.-G.; Lv, F.-Y.; Huang, Y.-Y.; Long, Y.-Z. Colorful hydrophobic poly (vinyl butyral)/cationic dye fibrous membranes via a colored solution electrospinning process. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2016, 11, 540–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  176. Yan, X.; Yu, M.; Han, W.-P.; You, M.-H.; Zhang, J.-C.; Dong, R.-H.; Zhang, H.-D.; Long, Y.-Z. Fabrication and formation mechanism of closed-loop fibers by electrospinning with a tip collector. Chin. Phys. B 2016, 25, 078106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Cai, M.; He, H.; Zhang, X.; Yan, X.; Li, J.; Chen, F.; Yuan, D.; Ning, X. Efficient synthesis of PVDF/PI side-by-side bicomponent nanofiber membrane with enhanced mechanical strength and good thermal stability. Nanomaterials 2019, 9, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Gait, M.J.; Sheppard, R.C. Rapid synthesis of oligodeoxyribonucleotides: A new solid-phase method. Nucleic Acids Res. 1977, 4, 1135–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Nikiforov, T.T.; Rendie, R.B.; Goelet, P.; Rogers, Y.; Kotewicz, M.L.; Anderson, S.; Trainor, G.L.; Knapp, M.R. Genetic bit analysis: A solid phase method for typing single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 1994, 22, 4167–4175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  180. Roberts, D.D.; Pollien, P.; Milo, C. Solid-phase microextraction method development for headspace analysis of volatile flavor compounds. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2000, 48, 2430–2437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Feng, P.; Wang, W.; Wang, K.; Cheng, S.; Jiang, K. Na3V2(PO4)3/C synthesized by facile solid-phase method assisted with agarose as high-performance cathode for sodium-ion battery. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 10261–10268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Yang, S.; Höti, N.; Yang, W.; Liu, Y.; Chen, L.; Li, S.; Zhang, H. Simultaneous analyses of n-linked and o-linked glycans of ovarian cancer cells using solid-phase chemoenzymatic method. Clin. Proteom. 2017, 14, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Premkumar, P.A.; Bahlawane, N.; Reiss, G.; Kohse-Höinghaus, K. CVD of metals using alcohols and metal acetylacetonates, part ii: Role of solvent and characterization of metal films made by pulsed spray evaporation CVD. Chem. Vap. Depos. 2010, 13, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Duan, X.; Chen, G.; Guo, L.A.; Zhu, Y.; Ye, H.; Wu, Y. A template-free CVD route to synthesize hierarchical porous ZnO films. Superlattice Microstruct. 2015, 88, 501–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Kong, Y.C.; Yu, D.P.; Zhang, B.; Fang, W.; Feng, S.Q. Ultraviolet-emitting ZnO nanowires synthesized by a physical vapor deposition approach. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 407–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Helmersson, U.; Lattemann, M.; Bohlmark, J.; Ehiasarian, A.P.; Gudmundsson, J.T. Ionized physical vapor deposition (IPVD): A review of technology and applications. Thin Solid Film 2006, 513, 1–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. Niu, C. Hybrid Ionized Physical Vapor Deposition of via and Trench Liners. U.S. Patent EP20070251306, 4 October 2007. [Google Scholar]
  188. Richter, G.; Hillerich, K.; Gianola, D.S.; Mönig, R.; Kraft, O.; Volkert, C.A. Ultrahigh strength single crystalline nanowhiskers grown by physical vapor deposition. Nano Lett. 2009, 9, 3048–3052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  189. Fischer, R.J.; Cho, A.Y. Molecular beam epitaxy. Prog. Solid State Chem. 1980, 10, 157–191. [Google Scholar]
  190. Beydoun, D.; Amal, R.; Low, G.; Mcevoy, S. Role of nanoparticles in photocatalysis. J. Nanopart. Res. 1999, 1, 439–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Andreev, B.; Chalkov, V.; Gusev, O.; Emel’Yanov, A.; Krasil’Nik, Z.; Kuznetsov, V.; Pak, P.; Shabanov, V.; Shengurov, V.; Shmagin, V. Realization of photo- and electroluminescent Si: Er structures by the method of sublimation molecular beam epitaxy. Nanotechnology 2002, 13, 97–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Look, D.C.; Reynolds, D.C.; Litton, C.W.; Jones, R.L. Characterization of homoepitaxial p-type ZnO grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 81, 1830–1832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Wang, D.; Pierre, A.; Kibria, M.G.; Cui, K.; Han, X.; Bevan, K.H.; Guo, H.; Paradis, S.; Hakima, A.R.; Mi, Z. Wafer-level photocatalytic water splitting on gan nanowire arrays grown by molecular beam epitaxy. Nano Lett. 2011, 11, 2353–2357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Qin, S.; Zhou, H.X. Fast method for computing chemical potentials and liquid-liquid phase equilibria of macromolecular solutions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2016, 120, 8164–8174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Khaliullina, A.S.; Dunyushkina, L.A. Preparation of a film electrolyte based on calcium zirconate on a porous electrode by a chemical liquid-phase method. Russ. J. Appl. Chem. 2017, 90, 1674–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Zhao, L.; Liu, J.; Wang, R.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Gai, G. Preparation technology of magnesium hydroxide flame retardant by liquid phase chemical method. Inorg. Chem. Ind. 2018, 50, 8–11. [Google Scholar]
  197. Navio, J.; Marchena, F.; Macias, M.; Sanchez-Soto, P.; Pichat, P. Formation of zirconium titanate powder from a Sol-gel prepared reactive precursor. J. Mater. Sci. 1992, 27, 2463–2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Liu, Z.; Zhou, Y.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y.; Ge, C. Preparation and characterization of (metal, nitrogen)-codoped TiO2 by TiCl4 sol-gel auto-igniting synthesis. Rare Met. 2007, 26, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  199. Gong, D.; Grimes, C.A.; Varghese, O.K.; Hu, W.; Singh, R.S.; Chen, Z.; Dickey, E.C. Titanium oxide nanotube arrays prepared by anodic oxidation. J. Mater. Res. 2011, 16, 3331–3334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Tsuchiya, H.; Macak, J.M.; Taveira, L.; Balaur, E.; Ghicov, A.; Sirotna, K.; Schmuki, P. Self-organized TiO2 nanotubes prepared in ammonium fluoride containing acetic acid electrolytes. Electrochem. Commun. 2005, 7, 576–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. El-Shazly, A.N.; Rashad, M.M.; Abdel-Aal, E.A.; Ibrahim, I.A.; El-Shahat, M.F.; Shalan, A.E. Nanostructured ZnO photocatalysts prepared via surfactant assisted co-precipitation method achieving enhanced photocatalytic activity for the degradation of methylene blue dyes. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 3177–3184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Jiang, X.; Zhao, X.; Duan, L.; Shen, H.; Liu, H.; Hou, T.; Wang, F. Enhanced photoluminescence and photocatalytic activity of ZnO-ZnWO4 nanocomposites synthesized by a precipitation method. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 15160–15165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Yin, L.; Zhang, D.; Wang, D.; Kong, X.; Huang, J.; Wang, F.; Wu, Y. Size dependent photocatalytic activity of ZnS nanostructures prepared by a facile precipitation method. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2016, 208, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Meng, Q.; Wang, J. Synthesis of Fe-doped ZnO by parallel flow precipitation method and its photocatalytic denitrification performance. CIESC J. 2017, 68, 437–443. [Google Scholar]
  205. Nouri, M.; Saray, A.M.; Azimi, H.R.; Yousefi, R. High solar-light photocatalytic activity of using Cu3Se2/RGO nanocomposites synthesized by a green co-precipitation method. Solid State Sci. 2017, 73, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Lassoued, M.S.; Lassoued, A.; Ammar, S.; Gadri, A.; Salah, A.B.; García-Granda, S. Synthesis and characterization of co-doped nano-TiO2 through co-precipitation method for photocatalytic activity. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 8914–8922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Begum, N.S.; Ahmed, H.M.F.; Gunashekar, K.R. Effects of Ni doping on photocatalytic activity of TiO2 thin films prepared by liquid phase deposition technique. Bull. Mater. Sci. 2008, 31, 747–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Shen, X.; Zhu, L.; Yu, H.; Tang, H.; Liu, S.; Li, W. Selective photocatalysis on molecular imprinted TiO2 thin films prepared via an improved liquid deposition method. New J. Chem. 2009, 33, 1673–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Wenderich, K.; Mul, G. Methods, mechanism, and applications of photodeposition in photocatalysis: A review. Chem. Rev. 2016, 116, 14587–14619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Yen, C.F.; Lee, I.H.; Chang, S.H.; Lin, C.T. The effect of annealing temperature of titanium oxide film for photocatalytic activity by liquid phase deposition. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Applied System Innovation (ICASI), Sapporo, Japan, 13–17 May 2017; pp. 664–667. [Google Scholar]
  211. Zhou, L.; Zhao, W.; Fang, Y. Photocatalytic Activity of Anatase TiO2 Thin Films Prepared by Liquid Phase Deposition. Chin. J. Chem 2002, 19, 919–922. [Google Scholar]
  212. Wang, L.; Wan, Y.; Li, Y.; Cai, Z.; Li, H.L.; Zhao, X.S.; Li, Q. Binary colloidal crystals fabricated with a horizontal deposition method. Langmuir 2009, 25, 6753–6759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Abou-Helal, M.O.; Seeber, W.T. Preparation of TiO2 thin films by spray pyrolysis to be used as a photocatalyst. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2002, 195, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Yuan, C. Low-temperature preparation of photocatalytic TiO2 thin films on polymer substrates by direct deposition from anatase sol. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2006, 22, 239–244. [Google Scholar]
  215. Kawai, T.; Sakata, T. Photocatalytic hydrogen production from liquid methanol and water. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1980, 15, 694–695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Elvington, M.; Brown, J.; Arachchige, S.M.; Brewer, K.J. Photocatalytic hydrogen production from water employing a Ru, Rh, Ru molecular device for photoinitiated electron collection. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 10644–10645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  217. Almazroai, L.S. Photocatalytic hydrogen production. Chem. Commun. 2009, 47, 9268–9274. [Google Scholar]
  218. Amirav, L.; Alivisatos, A.P. Photocatalytic hydrogen production with tunable nanorod heterostructures. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2010, 1, 1051–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  219. Murdoch, M.; Waterhouse, G.I.N.; Nadeem, M.A.; Metson, J.B.; Keane, M.A.; Howe, R.F.; Llorca, J.; Idriss, H. The effect of gold loading and particle size on photocatalytic hydrogen production from ethanol over Au/TiO2 nanoparticles. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3, 489–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. TS, T.; DG, N. Photocatalytic hydrogen production. Chem. Commun. 2011, 47, 9268–9274. [Google Scholar]
  221. Xu, W.P.; Zheng, L.; Xin, H.; Lin, C.; Okuyama, M. Formation of BaTiO3 and PbTiO3 thin films under mild hydrothermal conditions. J. Mater. Res. 1996, 11, 821–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Spanhel, L.; Weller, H.; Henglein, A. Photochemistry of semiconductor colloids. 22. Electron ejection from illuminated cadmium sulfide into attached titanium and zinc oxide particles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1987, 109, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Guidi, V.; Carotta, M.C.; Ferroni, M.; Martinelli, G.; Sacerdoti, M. Effect of dopants on grain coalescence and oxygen mobility in nanostructured titania anatase and rutile. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 120–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Yin, J.; Zou, Z.; Ye, J. Photophysical and photocatalytic properties of MIn0.5Nb0.5O3 (M = Ca, Sr, and Ba). J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 34, 14265–14269. [Google Scholar]
  225. Jaffrezicrenault, N.; Pichat, P.; Foissy, A.; Mercier, R. Effect of deposited Pt particles on the surface charge of TiO2 aqueous suspensions by potentiometry, electrophoresis, and labeled ion adsorption. J. Phys. Chem. 1986, 12, 2733–2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Fu, X.; Zeltner, W.A.; Anderson, M.A. The gas-phase photocatalytic mineralization of benzene on porous titania-based catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 1995, 6, 209–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Li, C.H.; Hsieh, Y.H.; Chiu, W.T.; Liu, C.C.; Kao, C.L. Study on preparation and photocatalytic performance of Ag/ TiO2 and Pt/TiO2 photocatalysts. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2007, 58, 148–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Ou, H.H.; Lo, S.L. Effect of Pt/Pd-doped TiO2 on the photocatalytic degradation of trichloroethylene. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2007, 275, 200–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Chavadej, S.; Phuaphromyod, P.; Gulari, E.; Rangsunvigit, P.; Sreethawong, T. Photocatalytic degradation of 2-propanol by using Pt/TiO2 prepared by microemulsion technique. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 137, 489–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Ma, Y.S.; Chang, C.N.; Chiang, Y.P.; Sung, H.F.; Chao, A.C. Photocatalytic degradation of lignin using Pt/TiO2 as the catalyst. Chemosphere 2008, 71, 998–1004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Yu, Z.; Chuang, S.S.C. The effect of pt on the photocatalytic degradation pathway of methylene blue over TiO2 under ambient conditions. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 83, 277–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Liang, Y.; Ding, M.; Yang, Y.; Xu, K.; Luo, X.; Yu, T.; Zhang, W.; Liu, W.; Yuan, C. Highly dispersed pt nanoparticles on hierarchical titania nanoflowers with {010} facets for gas sensing and photocatalysis. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 6826–6840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Rengaraj, S.; Li, X.Z. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of TiO2 by doping with ag for degradation of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol in aqueous suspension. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2006, 243, 60–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  234. Panpranot, J.; Nakkararuang, L.; Ngamsom, B.; Praserthdam, P. Synthesis, characterization, and catalytic properties of pd and Pd–Ag catalysts supported on nanocrystalline TiO2 prepared by the solvothermal method. Catal. Lett. 2005, 103, 53–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  235. Xin, B.; Jing, L.; Ren, Z.; Wang, B.; Fu, H. Effects of simultaneously doped and deposited Ag on the photocatalytic activity and surface states of TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 2805–2809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  236. Zhang, F.; Jin, R.; Chen, J.; Shao, C.; Gao, W.; Li, L.; Guan, N. High photocatalytic activity and selectivity for nitrogen in nitrate reduction on Ag/TiO2 catalyst with fine silver clusters. J. Catal. 2005, 232, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Anandan, S.; Kumar, P.S.; Pugazhenthiran, N.; Madhavan, J.; Maruthamuthu, P. Effect of loaded silver nanoparticles on TiO2 for photocatalytic degradation of acid red 88. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. C 2008, 92, 929–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Sobana, N.; Selvam, K.; Swaminathan, M. Optimization of photocatalytic degradation conditions of direct red 23 using nano-Ag doped TiO2. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2008, 62, 648–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Ranjit, K.T.; Varadarajan, T.K.; Viswanathan, B. Photocatalytic reduction of nitrite and nitrate ions to ammonia on Ru/TiO2 catalysts. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1995, 89, 67–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Chu, S.Z.; Inoue, S.; Wada, K.; Li, D.; Suzuki, J. Fabrication and photocatalytic characterizations of ordered nanoporous x-doped (x = N, C, S, Ru, Te, and Si) TiO2/Al2O3 films on ITO/glass. Langmuir ACS J. Surf. Colloids 2005, 21, 8035–8041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  241. Arana, J.; Dona-Rodrıguez, J.M.; González-Dıaz, O.; Rendón, E.T.; Melián, J.H.; Colon, G.; Navıo, J.A.; Peña, J.P. Gas-phase ethanol photocatalytic degradation study with TiO2 doped with Fe, Pd and Cu. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2004, 215, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Araña, J.; Doña-Rodríguez, J.M.; Melián, J.A.H.; Rendón, E.T.; Díaz, O.G. Role of Pd and Cu in gas-phase alcohols photocatalytic degradation with doped TiO2. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2005, 174, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Erkan, A.; Bakir, U.; Karakas, G. Photocatalytic microbial inactivation over pd doped SnO2 and TiO2 thin films. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2006, 184, 313–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  244. Aramendía, M.A.; Borau, V.; Colmenares, J.C.; Marinas, A.; Marinas, J.M.; Navío, J.A.; Urbano, F.J. Modification of the photocatalytic activity of Pd/TiO2 and Zn/TiO2 systems through different oxidative and reductive calcination treatments. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 80, 88–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  245. Zhu, B.; Li, K.; Zhou, J.; Wang, S.; Zhang, S.; Wu, S.; Huang, W. The preparation of palladium-modified TiO2 nanofibers and their photocatalytic performance. Catal. Commun. 2008, 9, 2323–2326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Arabatzis, I.M.; Stergiopoulos, T.; Andreeva, D.; Kitova, S.; Neophytides, S.G.; Falaras, P. Characterization and photocatalytic activity of Au/TiO2 thin films for azo-dye degradation. J. Catal. 2003, 220, 127–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Chiarello, G.L.; Selli, E.; Forni, L. Photocatalytic hydrogen production over flame spray pyrolysis-synthesised TiO2 and Au/TiO2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 84, 332–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  248. Jung, J.M.; Wang, M.; Kim, E.J.; Park, C.; Hahn, S.H. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Au-buffered TiO2 thin films prepared by radio frequency magnetron sputtering. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2008, 84, 389–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Kumar, P.S.S.; Sivakumar, R.; Anandan, S.; Madhavan, J.; Maruthamuthu, P.; Ashokkumar, M. Photocatalytic degradation of acid red 88 using Au–TiO2 nanoparticles in aqueous solutions. Water Res. 2008, 42, 4878–4884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  250. Yogi, C.; Kojima, K.; Wada, N.; Tokumoto, H.; Takai, T.; Mizoguchi, T.; Tamiaki, H. Photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue by TiO2 film and au particles-TiO2 composite film. Thin Solid Film 2008, 516, 5881–5884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Subramanian, V.; Wolf, E.E.; Kamat, P.V. Influence of metal/metal ion concentration on the photocatalytic activity of TiO2−Au composite nanoparticles. Langmuir 2003, 19, 469–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Kang, M.G.; Han, H.E.; Kim, K.J. Enhanced photodecomposition of 4-chlorophenol in aqueous solution by deposition of CdS on TiO2. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1999, 125, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Wilke, K.; Breuer, H.D. The influence of transition metal doping on the physical and photocatalytic properties of titania. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1999, 121, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Dhananjeyan, M.R.; Kandavelu, V.; Renganathan, R. A study on the photocatalytic reactions of TiO2 with certain pyrimidine bases: Effects of dopants (Fe3+) and calcination. J. Mol. Catal. A Chem. 2000, 151, 217–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  255. Hwang, S.; Lee, M.C.; Choi, W. Highly enhanced photocatalytic oxidation of Co on titania deposited with pt nanoparticles: Kinetics and mechanism. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2003, 46, 49–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  256. Wang, Z.S.; Ebina, Y.; Takada, K.; Mamoru Watanabe, A.; Sasaki, T. Inorganic multilayer assembly of titania semiconductor nanosheets and Ru complexes. Langmuir 2003, 19, 9534–9537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Naoi, K.; Yoshihisa Ohko, A.; Tatsuma, T. TiO2 films loaded with silver nanoparticles: Control of multicolor photochromic behavior. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 3664–3668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Wang, C.Y.; Liu, C.Y.; Chen, J.; Shen, T. The surface chemistry of hybrid nanometer-sized particlesii. Characterization and microstructure of au clusters supported on TiO2. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1997, 191, 464–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  259. Zhang, Z.B.; Wang, C.C.; Rama Zakaria, A. Role of particle size in nanocrystalline TiO2-based photocatalysts. J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 10871–10878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Sato, S.; White, J.M. Photodecomposition of water over Pt/TiO2 catalysts. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1980, 72, 83–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  261. Martra, G. Lewis acid and base sites at the surface of microcrystalline TiO2 anatase: Relationships between surface morphology and chemical behaviour. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2000, 200, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Kotolevich, Y.; Kolobova, E.; Mamontov, G.; Khramov, E.; Ortega, J.E.C.; Tiznado, H.; Farías, M.H.; Bogdanchikova, N.; Zubavichus, Y.; Mota-Morales, J.D. Au/TiO2 catalysts promoted with Fe and Mg for n-octanol oxidation under mild conditions. Catal. Today 2016, 278, 104–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Klein, M.; Nadolna, J.; Gołąbiewska, A.; Mazierski, P.; Klimczuk, T.; Remita, H.; Zaleska-Medynska, A. The effect of metal cluster deposition route on structure and photocatalytic activity of mono- and bimetallic nanoparticles supported on TiO2 by radiolytic method. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 378, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  264. Zhang, D.; Wang, J. Uv–visible light-activated Au@ pre-sulphated, monodisperse TiO2 aggregates for treatment of congo red and phthalylsulfathiazole. J. Water Process Eng. 2015, 7, 187–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  265. Padilla, R.H.; Priecel, P.; Lin, M.; Lopezsanchez, J.A.; Zhong, Z. A versatile sonication-assisted deposition-reduction method for preparing supported metal catalysts for catalytic applications. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2016, 35, 631–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Jaafar, N.F.; Jalil, A.A.; Triwahyono, S.; Efendi, J.; Mukti, R.R.; Jusoh, R.; Jusoh, N.W.C.; Karim, A.H.; Salleh, N.F.M.; Suendo, V. Direct in situ activation of Ag0 nanoparticles in synthesis of Ag/TiO2 and its photoactivity. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2015, 338, 75–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Arabzadeh, A.; Salimi, A. One dimensional CdS nanowire@TiO2 nanoparticles core-shell as high performance photocatalyst for fast degradation of dye pollutants under visible and sunlight irradiation. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2016, 479, 43–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Wu, G.; Li, J.; Fang, Z.; Lan, L.; Wang, R.; Gong, M.; Chen, Y. FeVO4 nanorods supported TiO2 as a superior catalyst for NH3–SCR reaction in a broad temperature range. Catal. Commun. 2015, 64, 75–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Chu, H.; Lei, W.; Liu, X.; Li, J.; Zheng, W.; Zhu, G.; Li, C.; Pan, L.; Sun, C. Synergetic effect of TiO2 as co-catalyst for enhanced visible light photocatalytic reduction of Cr(vi) on MoSe2. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2016, 521, 19–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Das, L.; Basu, J.K. Photocatalytic treatment of textile effluent using titania–zirconia nano composite catalyst. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2015, 24, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Shen, J.; Yang, H.; Feng, Y.; Cai, Q.; Shen, Q. Synthesis of 3D hierarchical porous TiO2/InVO4 nanocomposites with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic properties. Solid State Sci. 2014, 32, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Shen, J.; Yang, H.; Shen, Q.; Feng, Y.; Cai, Q. Template-free preparation and properties of mesoporous g-C3N4/TiO2 nanocomposite photocatalyst. CrystEngComm 2014, 16, 1868–1872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  273. Gao, H.; Wang, H.; Jin, Y.; Lv, J.; Xu, G.; Wang, D.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Z.; Zheng, Z.; Wu, Y. Controllable fabrication of immobilized ternary CdS/Pt-TiO2 heteronanostructures toward high-performance visible-light driven photocatalysis. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2015, 17, 17755–17761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  274. Hui, F.; Niu, T.; Zhang, S.; Bo, L.; Cai, Q. Fabrication of layered (CdS-Mn/MoS2/CdTe)-promoted TiO2 nanotube arrays with superior photocatalytic properties. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 486, 58–66. [Google Scholar]
  275. Borgarello, E.; Kiwi, J.; Graetzel, M.; Pelizzetti, E.; Visca, M. Visible light induced water cleavage in colloidal solutions of chromium-doped titanium dioxide particles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 2996–3002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  276. Choi, W.; Termin, A.; Hoffmann, M.R. The role of metal ion dopants in quantum-sized TiO2: Correlation between photoreactivity and charge carrier recombination dynamics. J. Phys. Chem. 1994, 98, 13669–13679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Wang, Q.; Jin, R.; Zhang, M.; Gao, S. Solvothermal preparation of Fe-doped TiO2 nanotube arrays for enhancement in visible light induced photoelectrochemical performance. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 690, 139–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Inturi, S.N.R.; Suidan, M.; Smirniotis, P.G. Influence of synthesis method on leaching of the Cr- TiO2 catalyst for visible light liquid phase photocatalysis and their stability. Br. Med. J. 2016, 180, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Ma, C.; Wang, F.; Zhang, C.; Yu, Z.; Wei, J.; Yang, Z.; Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhu, M.; Shen, L. Photocatalytic decomposition of congo red under visible light irradiation using MgZnCr-TiO2 layered double hydroxide. Chemosphere 2017, 168, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  280. Villabona-Leal, E.G.; López-Neira, J.P.; Pedraza-Avella, J.A.; Pérez, E.; Meza, O. Screening of factors influencing the photocatalytic activity of TiO2: Ln (Ln = La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Sm, Eu and Gd) in the degradation of dyes. Comp. Mater. Sci. 2015, 107, 48–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Malengreaux, C.M.; Pirard, S.L.; Léonard, G.; Mahy, J.G.; Herlitschke, M.; Klobes, B.; Hermann, R.; Heinrichs, B.; Bartlett, J.R. Study of the photocatalytic activity of Fe3+, Cr3+, La3+ and Eu3+ single-doped and co-doped TiO2 catalysts produced by aqueous sol-gel processing. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 691, 726–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Zang, L.; Macyk, W.; Lange, C.; Maier, W.F.; Antonius, C.; Meissner, D.; Kisch, H. Visible-light detoxification and charge generation by transition metal chloride modified Titania. Chemistry 2000, 6, 379–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Mittal, A.; Mari, B.; Sharma, S.; Kumari, V.; Maken, S.; Kumari, K.; Kumar, N. Non-metal modified TiO2: A step towards visible light photocatalysis. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2019, 30, 3186–3207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  284. Dolat, D.; Quici, N.; Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Morawski, A.; Puma, G.L. One-step, hydrothermal synthesis of nitrogen, carbon co-doped titanium dioxide (N, C-TiO2) photocatalysts. Effect of alcohol degree and chain length as carbon dopant precursors on photocatalytic activity and catalyst deactivation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 115, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  285. Asahi, R.; Morikawa, T.; Ohwaki, T.; Aoki, K.; Taga, Y. Visible-light photocatalysis in nitrogen-doped titanium oxides. Science 2001, 293, 269–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  286. Kitano, M.; Funatsu, K.; Matsuoka, M.; Ueshima, M.; Anpo, M. Preparation of nitrogen-substituted TiO2 thin film photocatalysts by the radio frequency magnetron sputtering deposition method and their photocatalytic reactivity under visible light irradiation. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 25266–25272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  287. Horovitz, I.; Avisar, D.; Baker, M.A.; Grilli, R.; Lozzi, L.; Di, C.D.; Mamane, H. Carbamazepine degradation using a N-doped TiO2 coated photocatalytic membrane reactor: Influence of physical parameters. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 310, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Lei, Z.; Zhao, L.; Li, M.; Jin, Y.; Song, W.; Zeng, D.; Xie, C. A modular calcination method to prepare modified N-doped TiO2 nanoparticle with high photocatalytic activity. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2016, 183, 308–316. [Google Scholar]
  289. Gong, Y.; Zhao, X.; Zhang, H.; Yang, B.; Xiao, K.; Guo, T.; Zhang, J.; Shao, H.; Wang, Y.; Yu, G. MOF-derived nitrogen doped carbon modified g-C3N4 heterostructure composite with enhanced photocatalytic activity for bisphenol a degradation with peroxymonosulfate under visible light irradiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2018, 233, 35–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  290. Castellanosleal, E.L.; Acevedopeña, P.; Güizaargüello, V.R.; Córdobatuta, E.M.; Castellanosleal, E.L.; Acevedopeña, P.; Güizaargüello, V.R.; Córdobatuta, E.M. N and f codoped TiO2 thin films on stainless steel for photoelectrocatalytic removal of cyanide ions in aqueous solutions. Mater. Res. 2017, 20, 487–495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Khan, S.U.; Al-Shahry, M.; Ingler, W.B. Efficient photochemical water splitting by a chemically modified n-TiO2. Science 2002, 297, 2243–2245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  292. Tachikawa, T.; Tojo, S.; Kawai, K.; Endo, M.; Fujitsuka, M.; Ohno, T.; Nishijima, K.; Miyamoto, Z.; Majima, T. Photocatalytic oxidation reactivity of holes in the sulfur- and carbon-doped TiO2 powders studied by time-resolved diffuse reflectance spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 19299–19306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Valentin, C.D.; Pacchioni, G.; Selloni, A. Theory of carbon doping of titanium dioxide. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 6656–6665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Ohno, T.; Akiyoshi, M.; Umebayashi, T.; Asai, K.; Mitsui, T.; Matsumura, M. Preparation of S-doped TiO2 photocatalysts and their photocatalytic activities under visible light. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2004, 265, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Huo, Y.; Zhu, J. Supercritical preparation of a highly active S-doped TiO2 photocatalyst for methylene blue mineralization. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 4410–4414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  296. Nishijima, K.; Ohtani, B.; Yan, X.; Kamai, T.A.; Chiyoya, T.; Tsubota, T.; Murakami, N.; Ohno, T. Incident light dependence for photocatalytic degradation of acetaldehyde and acetic acid on S-doped and N-doped TiO2 photocatalysts. Chem. Phys. 2007, 339, 64–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Yang, K.; Dai, Y.; Huang, B. Understanding photocatalytic activity of S- and P-doped TiO2 under visible light from first-principles. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 18985–18994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Ogle, C.K.; Trocki, O.; Nagy, H.; Ogle, J.D.; Warden, G.D.; Alexander, J.W. Development of metal cation compound-loaded S-doped TiO2 photocatalysts having a rutile phase under visible light. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2008, 349, 70–75. [Google Scholar]
  299. Wang, Y.; Li, J.; Peng, P.; Lu, T.; Wang, L. Preparation of S-TiO2 photocatalyst and photodegradation of l-acid under visible light. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 5276–5280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Shi, Q.; Yang, D.; Jiang, Z.; Li, J. Visible-light photocatalytic regeneration of nadh using P-doped TiO2 nanoparticles. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2006, 43, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  301. Yu, H.F. Photocatalytic abilities of gel-derived P-doped TiO2. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2007, 68, 600–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  302. Wu, G.; Chen, A. Direct growth of F-doped TiO2 particulate thin films with high photocatalytic activity for environmental applications. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2008, 195, 47–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Yu, J.C.; Yu, J.; Ho, W.; Jiang, Z.; Zhang, L. Effects of F-doping on the photocatalytic activity and microstructures of nanocrystalline TiO2 powders. Chem. Mater. 2002, 14, 3808–3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  304. Park, J.S.; Choi, W. Enhanced remote photocatalytic oxidation on surface-fluorinated TiO2. Langmuir ACS J. Surf. Colloids 2004, 20, 11523–11527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  305. Xie, Y.; Zhao, X.; Li, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Zhou, X.; Yuan, Q. Ctab-assisted synthesis of mesoporous F–N-codoped TiO2 powders with high visible-light-driven catalytic activity and adsorption capacity. J. Solid. State. Chem. 2008, 181, 1936–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Xu, J.; Ao, Y.; Fu, D.; Yuan, C. Low-temperature preparation of F-doped TiO2 film and its photocatalytic activity under solar light. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 3033–3038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Song, C.L.; Wang, J.; Zeng, M.L.; Zhu, J.Q.; Liu, Y.; Xu, G.; Han, G.R. Investigation of photocatalytic and low-emissivity properties of TiO2: F films featuring columnar structure prepared on SnO2: F substrate by sol–gel method. J. Sol-Gel Sci. Technol. 2013, 68, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Yamazaki, S.; Yoshida, A.; Abe, H. Photocatalytic degradation of chloroform in the gas phase on the porous TiO2 pellets: Effect of cl accumulated on the catalyst surface. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2005, 169, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Hong, X.; Wang, Z.; Cai, W.; Lu, F.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Y.; Ma, N.; Liu, Y. Visible-light-activated nanoparticle photocatalyst of iodine-doped titanium dioxide. Chem. Mater. 2005, 17, 1548–1552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Moon, S.C.; Mametsuka, H.; Tabata, S.; Suzuki, E. Photocatalytic production of hydrogen from water using TiO2 and B/TiO2. Catal. Today 2000, 58, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Zhao, W.; Ma, W.; Chen, C.; Zhao, J.; Shuai, Z. Efficient degradation of toxic organic pollutants with Ni2O3/TiO(2−x) Bx under visible irradiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 4782–4783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  312. Fittipaldi, M.; Gombac, V.; Montini, T.; Fornasiero, P.; Graziani, M. A high-frequency (95 GHz) electron paramagnetic resonance study of B-doped TiO2 photocatalysts. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2008, 361, 3980–3987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Li, J.S.; Shieh, D.L.; Li, D.Y.; Ho, C.H.; Yang, S.J.; Lin, J.L. Photodegradation of CH3I on mesoporous TiO2-B nanofibers with Au nanoparticles. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2008, 254, 4655–4664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  314. Takabayashi, S.; Nakamura, R.; Nakato, Y. A nano-modified Si/TiO2 composite electrode for efficient solar water splitting. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2004, 166, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Yang, K.; Dai, Y.; Huang, B. First-principles calculations for geometrical structures and electronic properties of Si-doped TiO2. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2008, 456, 71–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  316. Jin, R.; Wu, Z.; Liu, Y.; Jiang, B.; Wang, H. Photocatalytic reduction of no with NH3 using Si-doped TiO2 prepared by hydrothermal method. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 161, 42–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  317. Simsek, E.B. Solvothermal synthesized boron doped TiO2 catalysts: Photocatalytic degradation of endocrine disrupting compounds and pharmaceuticals under visible light irradiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 200, 309–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. He, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, I.; Wu, J.; Yang, Y.; An, Q. Carbon wrapped and doped TiO2 mesoporous nanostructure with efficient visible-light photocatalysis for NO removal. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 391, 318–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. El-Sheikh, S.M.; Khedr, T.M.; Hakki, A.; Ismail, A.A.; Badawy, W.A.; Bahnemann, D.W. Visible light activated carbon and nitrogen co-doped mesoporous TiO2 as efficient photocatalyst for degradation of ibuprofen. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 173, 258–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  320. Zhang, Y.; Li, L.; Liu, H.; Lu, T. Graphene oxide and f co-doped TiO2 with (001) facets for the photocatalytic reduction of bromate: Synthesis, characterization and reactivity. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 307, 860–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  321. Lei, X.F.; Zhang, Z.N.; Wu, Z.X.; Piao, Y.J.; Chen, C.; Li, X.; Xue, X.X.; Yang, H. Synthesis and characterization of Fe, N and C tri-doped polymorphic TiO2 and the visible light photocatalytic reduction of cr(vi). Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 174, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Chen, Y.; Liu, K. Fabrication of Ce/N co-doped TiO2/diatomite granule catalyst and its improved visible-light-driven photoactivity. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 324, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  323. Han, Y.; Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y. Visible-light-induced photocatalytic oxidation of nitric oxide and sulfur dioxide: Discrete kinetics and mechanism. Energy 2016, 103, 725–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Wan, J.; Wei, M.; Hu, Z.; Peng, Z.; Wang, B.; Feng, D.; Shen, Y. Ternary composites of TiO2 nanotubes with reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and meso-tetra (4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin for enhanced visible light photocatalysis. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2016, 41, 14692–14703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  325. Zoltan, T.; Rosales, M.C.; Yadarola, C. Reactive oxygen species quantification and their correlation with the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 (anatase and rutile) sensitized with asymmetric porphyrins. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 3967–3980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Zhao, X.; Liu, X.; Yu, M.; Wang, C.; Li, J. The highly efficient and stable Cu, Co, Zn-porphyrin–TiO2 photocatalysts with heterojunction by using fashioned one-step method. Dyes Pigments 2017, 136, 648–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  327. Wei, M.; Wan, J.; Hu, Z.; Peng, Z.; Wang, B. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation activity over TiO2 nanotubes co-sensitized by reduced graphene oxide and copper(ii) meso-tetra(4-carboxyphenyl) porphyrin. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 377, 149–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Chowdhury, P.; Athapaththu, S.; Elkamel, A.; Ray, A.K. Visible-solar-light-driven photo-reduction and removal of cadmium ion with eosin Y-sensitized TiO2 in aqueous solution of triethanolamine. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2017, 174, 109–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Altın, İ.; Sökmen, M.; Bıyıklıoğlu, Z. Sol gel synthesis of cobalt doped TiO2 and its dye sensitization for efficient pollutant removal. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Proc. 2016, 45, 36–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Albay, C.; Koç, M.; Altın, İ.; Bayrak, R.; Değirmencioğlu, İ.; Sökmen, M. New dye sensitized photocatalysts: Copper(ii)-phthalocyanine/TiO2 nanocomposite for water remediation. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 2016, 324, 117–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  331. O’Regan, B.; Grätzel, M. A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized colloidal TiO2 films. Nature 1991, 353, 737–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  332. Bach, U.; Lupo, D.; Comte, P.; Moser, J.E.; Weissörtel, F.; Salbeck, J.; Spreitzer, H.; Grätzel, M. Solid-state dye-sensitized mesoporous TiO2 solar cells with high photon-to-electron conversion efficiencies. Nature 1998, 395, 583–585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  333. Acar, C.; Dincer, I.; Naterer, G.F. Review of photocatalytic water-splitting methods for sustainable hydrogen production. Int. J. Energy Res. 2016, 40, 1449–1473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Cao, S.; Yu, J. Carbon-based H2-production photocatalytic materials. J. Photochem. Photobiol. C 2016, 27, 72–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. Zhang, J.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, X.; Chen, C.; Dong, C.-L.; Liu, R.-S.; Han, C.-P.; Li, Y.; Gogotsi, Y.; Wang, G. Single platinum atoms immobilized on an mxene as an efficient catalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Nat. Catal. 2018, 1, 985–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  336. Bi, L.; Gao, X.; Ma, Z.; Zhang, L.; Wang, D.; Xie, T. Enhanced separation efficiency of PtNix/g-C3N4 for photocatalytic hydrogen production. ChemCatChem 2017, 9, 3779–3785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  337. Zhang, W.; Lehmann, S.; Mergenthaler, K.; Wallentin, J.; Borgström, M.T.; Pistol, M.E.; Yartsev, A. Carrier recombination dynamics in sulfur-doped inp nanowires. Nano Lett. 2015, 15, 7238–7244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  338. Ghosh, R.; Imakita, K.; Fujii, M.; Giri, P.K. Effect of Ag/Au bilayer assisted etching on the strongly enhanced photoluminescence and visible light photocatalysis by si nanowire arrays. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016, 18, 7715–7727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  339. Jiang, L.; Ni, S.; Liu, G.; Xu, X. Photocatalytic hydrogen production over aurivillius compound Bi3TiNbO9 and its modifications by Cr/Nb co-doping. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2017, 217, 342–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Frank, S.N.; Bard, A.J. Heterogeneous photocatalytic oxidation of cyanide ion in aqueous solutions at titanium dioxide powder. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1977, 8, 303–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Wan, J. Application of the multiphase photocatalytic oxidation technologies in papermaking wastewater treatment. Trans. China Pulp Pap. 2002, 17, 119–121. [Google Scholar]
  342. Devisscher, M.; Ciacci, G.; Fé, L.; Benedetti, L.; Bixio, D.; Thoeye, C.; De, G.G.; Marsililibelli, S.; Vanrolleghem, P.A. Estimating costs and benefits of advanced control for wastewater treatment plants-the MAgIC methodology. Water Sci. Technol. 2006, 53, 215–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  343. Wenzel, H.; Larsen, H.F.; Clauson-Kaas, J.; Høibye, L.; Jacobsen, B.N. Weighing environmental advantages and disadvantages of advanced wastewater treatment of micro-pollutants using environmental life cycle assessment. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. Rizzo, L. Water and wastewater treatment by heterogeneous photocatalysis: A review. In Handbook of Photocatalysts: Preparation, Structure and Applications; Castello, G.K., Ed.; Nova Science Publishers: New York, NY, USA, 2009; Chapter 7; ISBN 978-1-60876-210-1. [Google Scholar]
  345. Chovelon, J.M.; Ferronato, C.; Fine, L. What Are the Main Factors Limiting the Industrial Implementation of Photocatalytic Reactors for Wastewater Treatment. 2018. Available online: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01677603/ (accessed on 16 September 2018).
  346. Duraisamy, N.; Kandiah, K.; Rajendran, R.; Prabhu, S.; Ramesh, R.; Dhanaraj, G. Electrochemical and photocatalytic investigation of nickel oxide for energy storage and wastewater treatment. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2018, 44, 5653–5667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  347. Sacco, O.; Vaiano, V.; Rizzo, L.; Sannino, D. Photocatalytic activity of a visible light active structured photocatalyst developed for municipal wastewater treatment. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 175, 38–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  348. Wong, S.P.; Kanakaraju, D. Photocatalytic efficiency of TiO2-biomass loaded mixture for wastewater treatment. J. Chem. 2018, 2018, 1–14. [Google Scholar]
  349. Zakeritabar, S.F.; Jahanshahi, M.; Peyravi, M. Photocatalytic behavior of induced membrane by ZrO2–SnO2 nanocomposite for pharmaceutical wastewater treatment. Catal. Lett. 2018, 148, 882–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Li Puma, G. Dimensionless analysis of photocatalytic reactors using suspended solid photocatalysts. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2005, 83, 820–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Houas, A.; Lachheb, H.; Ksibi, M.; Elaloui, E.; Guillard, C.; Herrmann, J.-M. Photocatalytic degradation pathway of methylene blue in water. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2001, 31, 145–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  352. Lachheb, H.; Puzenat, E.; Houas, A.; Ksibi, M.; Elaloui, E.; Guillard, C.; Herrmann, J.-M. Photocatalytic degradation of various types of dyes (Alizarin S, Crocein Orange G, Methyl Red, Congo Red, Methylene Blue) in water by UV-irradiated titania. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2002, 39, 75–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  353. Regmi, C.; Kshetri, Y.K.; Kim, T.H.; Pandey, R.P.; Ray, S.K.; Lee, S.W. Fabrication of Ni-doped BiVO4 semiconductors with enhanced visible-light photocatalytic performances for wastewater treatment. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 413, 253–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  354. Cai, Z.; Xiong, Z.; Lu, X.; Teng, J. Insitu gold-loaded titania photonic crystals with enhanced photocatalytic activity. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 2, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  355. Cai, Z.; Teng, J.; Xiong, Z.; Li, Y.; Li, Q.; Lu, X.; Zhao, X.S. Fabrication of TiO2 binary inverse opals without overlayers via the sandwich-vacuum infiltration of precursor. Langmuir ACS J. Surf. Colloids 2011, 27, 5157–5164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  356. Zhao, X.; Liu, H.; Shen, Y.; Qu, J. Photocatalytic reduction of bromate at C60 modified Bi2MoO6 under visible light irradiation. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2011, 106, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  357. Matsunaga, T.; Tomoda, R.; Nakajima, T.; Wake, H. Photoelectrochemical sterilization of microbial cells by semiconductor powders. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 1985, 29, 211–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  358. Chen, L.; He, F.; Huang, Y.; Meng, Y.; Guo, R. Hydrogenated nanoporous TiO2 film on Ti-25Nb-3Mo-2Sn-3Zr alloy with enhanced photocatalytic and sterilization activities driven by visible light. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 678, 5–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  359. Tian, Y.; Zhou, F.; Zhan, S.; Yang, Y.; Liu, Y.; He, Q. Mechanisms on the sterilization performance of fluorocarbon resin composite coatings enhanced by g-C3N4/TiO2. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2017, 27, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  360. Yan, L.L.; Wang, Y.; Xiong, L.B.; Li, J.L.; Yip, H.Y.; Wong, P.K.; Yu, Y. Preparation and photocatalytic sterilization property of Cu2O nanostructure with copper anode oxidation method. Chin. J. Inorg. Chem. 2009, 25, 1960–1964. [Google Scholar]
  361. Kim, B.-H.; Kim, D.; Cho, D.-L.; Lim, S.-H.; Yoo, S.y.; Kook, J.-k.; Cho, Y.i.; Ohk, S.-H.; Ko, Y.-M. Sterilization effects of a TiO2 photocatalytic film against a streptococcus mutans culture. Biotechnol. Bioprocess. Eng. 2007, 12, 136–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  362. Jones, N.; Ray, B.; Ranjit, K.T.; Manna, A.C. Antibacterial activity of zno nanoparticle suspensions on a broad spectrum of microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2010, 279, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  363. Adams, L.K.; Lyon, D.Y.; Alvarez, P.J.J. Comparative eco-toxicity of nanoscale TiO2, SiO2, and ZnO water suspensions. Water Res. 2006, 40, 3527–3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  364. Zhao, H.; Tian, F.; Wang, R.; Chen, R. A review on bismuth-related nanomaterials for photocatalysis. Rev. Adv. Sci. Eng. 2014, 3, 3–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  365. Matos, J.; Llano, B.; Montaña, R.; Poon, P.S.; Hidalgo, M.C. Design of Ag/ and Pt/TiO2-SiO2 nanomaterials for the photocatalytic degradation of phenol under solar irradiation. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 18894–18913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  366. Qin, Z.; Su, T.; Ji, H.; Guo, Z.; Chen, Y.; Lu, N.L. Photocatalytic Nanomaterials for the Energy and environmental application. Multifunct. Nanocompos. Energy Environ. Appl. 2018, 2, 353–401. [Google Scholar]
  367. Song, Y.S.; Kim, Y.; Lee, H.; Lee, D.Y.; Lee, M.H.; Kim, B.Y. Photocatalytic activity of Al-TiO2 nanomaterials for the degradation of methylene blue dye. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2018, 72, 412–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  368. Obuchi, E.; Furusho, T.; Katoh, K.; Soejima, T.; Nakano, K. Photocatalytic disinfection of sporulating bacillus subtilis using silver-doped TiO2/SiO2. J. Water Process Eng. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  369. Guzman, M.I. Prebiotic metabolism: Production by mineral photoelectrochemistry of alpha-ketocarboxylic acids in the reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle. Astrobiology 2009, 9, 833–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  370. Eggins, B.R.; Robertson, P.K.J.; Stewart, J.H.; Woods, E. Photoreduction of carbon dioxide on zinc sulfide to give four-carbon and two-carbon acids. J. Chem. Soc. Chem. Commun. 1993, 24, 349–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  371. D’hennezel, O.; Pichat, P.; Ollis, D.F. Benzene and toluene gas-phase photocatalytic degradation over H2O and HCl pretreated TiO2: By-products and mechanisms. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A 1998, 118, 197–204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  372. Pichat, P.; Disdier, J.; Hoang-Van, C.; Mas, D.; Goutailler, G.; Gaysse, C. Purification/deodorization of indoor air and gaseous effluents by TiO2 photocatalysis. Catal. Today 2000, 63, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  373. Alberici, R.M.; Jardim, W.F. Photocatalytic destruction of vocs in the gas-phase using titanium dioxide. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 1997, 14, 55–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  374. Vandenbroucke, A.M.; Morent, R.; De, G.N.; Leys, C. Non-thermal plasmas for non-catalytic and catalytic voc abatement. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 195, 30–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  375. Li, F.B.; Li, X.Z.; Ao, C.H.; Lee, S.C.; Hou, M.F. Enhanced photocatalytic degradation of VOCs using Ln3+–TiO2 catalysts for indoor air purification. Chemosphere 2005, 59, 787–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  376. Lin, L.; Chai, Y.; Zhao, B.; Wei, W.; He, D.; He, B.; Tang, Q. Photocatalytic oxidation for degradation of VOCs. Open J. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 03, 14–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  377. Lugo Vega, C.S. Evaluation of VOC Degradation in Photo-Catalytic Air Reactors: TiO2 Immobilization, Energy Efficiency and Kinetic Modeling. Ph.D. Thesis, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada, 2016. Available online: https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4019 (accessed on 16 September 2018).
  378. Mamaghani, A.H.; Haghighat, F.; Lee, C.S. Photocatalytic degradation of VOCs on various commercial titanium dioxides: Impact of operating parameters on removal efficiency and by-products generation. Build. Environ. 2018, 138, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  379. Stucchi, M.; Galli, F.; Bianchi, C.L.; Pirola, C.; Boffito, D.C.; Biasioli, F.; Capucci, V. Simultaneous photodegradation of voc mixture by TiO2 powders. Chemosphere 2018, 193, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  380. Zallouha, M.A.; Landkocz, Y.; Brunet, J.; Cousin, R.; Genty, E.; Courcot, D.; Siffert, S.; Shirali, P.; Billet, S. Usefulness of toxicological validation of VOCs catalytic degradation by air-liquid interface exposure system. Environ. Res. 2017, 152, 328–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  381. Mishra, A.; Mehta, A.; Kainth, S.; Basu, S. Effect of different plasmonic metals on photocatalytic degradation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by bentonite/M-TiO2 nanocomposites under UV/visible light. Appl. Clay Sci. 2018, 153, 144–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  382. Weilin, G.E.; Qian, J.; Siyao, X.U.; Sen, L.I. Catalytic degradation of volatile organic compounds over Cr-Ce/Al2O3 catalysts. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2018, 12, 374–381. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Photocatalytic reaction mechanism.
Figure 1. Photocatalytic reaction mechanism.
Applsci 09 02489 g001
Figure 2. Various modification methods of a semiconductor photocatalyst.
Figure 2. Various modification methods of a semiconductor photocatalyst.
Applsci 09 02489 g002
Figure 3. Photocatalyst preparation method.
Figure 3. Photocatalyst preparation method.
Applsci 09 02489 g003
Figure 4. (A) Schematic illustration of electrospinning and (B) SEM image of TiO2 nanofibers prepared by electrospinning.
Figure 4. (A) Schematic illustration of electrospinning and (B) SEM image of TiO2 nanofibers prepared by electrospinning.
Applsci 09 02489 g004
Figure 5. Nanofilm or nanoparticles by a sol–gel method.
Figure 5. Nanofilm or nanoparticles by a sol–gel method.
Applsci 09 02489 g005
Figure 6. Block diagram of (A) mono metal or bimetallic (both) TiO2 modification and (B) bimetallic TiO2 modification (seq) [263].
Figure 6. Block diagram of (A) mono metal or bimetallic (both) TiO2 modification and (B) bimetallic TiO2 modification (seq) [263].
Applsci 09 02489 g006
Figure 7. (A) UV-Vis spectra of TiO2-xNx and TiO2 and (B) the photocatalytic property of acetaldehyde [285].
Figure 7. (A) UV-Vis spectra of TiO2-xNx and TiO2 and (B) the photocatalytic property of acetaldehyde [285].
Applsci 09 02489 g007
Figure 8. (A) Electrocatalytic performance for Mo2TiC2Tx-PtSA and reference HeR catalysts. (B) Magnified HAADF–STEM image of Mo2TiC2Tx-PtSA and its corresponding simulated image, as well as an illustration of the structure of Mo2TiC2Tx-PtSA, showing the isolated Pt atoms (circles in c) [335].
Figure 8. (A) Electrocatalytic performance for Mo2TiC2Tx-PtSA and reference HeR catalysts. (B) Magnified HAADF–STEM image of Mo2TiC2Tx-PtSA and its corresponding simulated image, as well as an illustration of the structure of Mo2TiC2Tx-PtSA, showing the isolated Pt atoms (circles in c) [335].
Applsci 09 02489 g008
Figure 9. (A) Comparison of the photocatalytic H2 production activity of g-C3N4, 0.5% PtNix/g-C3N4, 2.5% PtNix/g-C3N4, 5.0% PtNix/g-C3N4, and 10.0% PtNix/g-C3N4 samples using triethanolamine as the scavenger under a 500 W Xe lamp irradiation. (B) Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of 2.5% PtNix-g-C3N4 and g-C3N4 [336].
Figure 9. (A) Comparison of the photocatalytic H2 production activity of g-C3N4, 0.5% PtNix/g-C3N4, 2.5% PtNix/g-C3N4, 5.0% PtNix/g-C3N4, and 10.0% PtNix/g-C3N4 samples using triethanolamine as the scavenger under a 500 W Xe lamp irradiation. (B) Photoluminescence (PL) spectra of 2.5% PtNix-g-C3N4 and g-C3N4 [336].
Applsci 09 02489 g009
Figure 10. (A) Photocatalytic hydrogen production of all samples under full range illumination (λ ≥ 250 nm) in sodium sulfite aqueous solution (0.05 M). (B) Average photocatalytic hydrogen production rate under full range (λ ≥ 250 nm) and visible light illumination (λ ≥ 420 nm) [339].
Figure 10. (A) Photocatalytic hydrogen production of all samples under full range illumination (λ ≥ 250 nm) in sodium sulfite aqueous solution (0.05 M). (B) Average photocatalytic hydrogen production rate under full range (λ ≥ 250 nm) and visible light illumination (λ ≥ 420 nm) [339].
Applsci 09 02489 g010
Figure 11. (A) Photodegradation profiles of rhodamine B over the samples: Rhodamine B without photocatalyst, PVDF and TiO2/PVDF composites hydrothermal treated for 4 h, 6 h, and 10 h. (B) The photocatalyst treated for 10 h was used for rhodamine B degradation, and the number of cycles was five times [167].
Figure 11. (A) Photodegradation profiles of rhodamine B over the samples: Rhodamine B without photocatalyst, PVDF and TiO2/PVDF composites hydrothermal treated for 4 h, 6 h, and 10 h. (B) The photocatalyst treated for 10 h was used for rhodamine B degradation, and the number of cycles was five times [167].
Applsci 09 02489 g011
Figure 12. UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of BiVO4 samples with different wt% of Ni ions. Inset is the Kubelka–Munk plot with the corresponding band gap energies [353].
Figure 12. UV-Vis diffuse reflectance spectra of BiVO4 samples with different wt% of Ni ions. Inset is the Kubelka–Munk plot with the corresponding band gap energies [353].
Applsci 09 02489 g012
Figure 13. Inactivation of E. coli on: (A) Irradiation to full solar spectrum light; (B) visible light [353].
Figure 13. Inactivation of E. coli on: (A) Irradiation to full solar spectrum light; (B) visible light [353].
Applsci 09 02489 g013
Figure 14. (A) Schematic illustration of procedures for the fabrication of 3DOM TiO2 films loaded with gold nanoparticles. (B) Photocatalytic degradation of benzoic acid (BA) over (a) i-Au–TiO2-o without UV irradiation, (b) nanocrystalline TiO2, (c) i-TiO2-o, and (d) i-Au–TiO2-o under UV irradiation [354].
Figure 14. (A) Schematic illustration of procedures for the fabrication of 3DOM TiO2 films loaded with gold nanoparticles. (B) Photocatalytic degradation of benzoic acid (BA) over (a) i-Au–TiO2-o without UV irradiation, (b) nanocrystalline TiO2, (c) i-TiO2-o, and (d) i-Au–TiO2-o under UV irradiation [354].
Applsci 09 02489 g014
Figure 15. (A) Survival rate of sporulating Bacillus subtilis against process time using TiO2/SiO2 and Ag-doped TiO2/SiO2 (BL; under ultraviolet irradiation, dark; without UV irradiation). (B) Relationship between Ag amount and rate constant [368].
Figure 15. (A) Survival rate of sporulating Bacillus subtilis against process time using TiO2/SiO2 and Ag-doped TiO2/SiO2 (BL; under ultraviolet irradiation, dark; without UV irradiation). (B) Relationship between Ag amount and rate constant [368].
Applsci 09 02489 g015
Figure 16. Applications of semiconductor photocatalysis.
Figure 16. Applications of semiconductor photocatalysis.
Applsci 09 02489 g016
Table 1. Effects of influencing factors on photocatalytic reaction.
Table 1. Effects of influencing factors on photocatalytic reaction.
Influencing Factors Effect on Photocatalysis
Catalyst concentration - The reaction rate increases with the increase of the catalyst concentration.
- Above a certain dose, the reaction rate decreases as the catalyst concentration increases.
Light source and light intensityLight source- Provide light of different wavelengths.
Light- Improve light intensity and promote photocatalytic
intensityreaction.
PH value - Related to target degradation products.
Plus oxidants - Reducing the recombination of photogenerated electrons and holes to improve photocatalytic efficiency.
Inorganic ionAnion- Improve the separation speed of photogenerated electrons and holes and promote photocatalytic reaction.
Cation- Becomes a scavenger of hydroxyl radicals, forming anion radicals.
- The competitive adsorption of active sites on the surface of the catalyst may affect the photocatalytic degradation of organics.
Temperature - Has little effect.
Table 2. Band gaps of common photocatalysts.
Table 2. Band gaps of common photocatalysts.
SemiconductorCrystal StructureBand Gap Structure (PH = 7)Reference
CBVBEg/eV
TiO2Anatase−0.502.703.20[149]
ZnO −0.312.893.20[150]
CuO −1.160.852.00[151]
CdS −0.901.502.40[152]
ZnS −1.042.563.60[101]
g-C3N4 −1.301.402.70[139,153]
g-C3N4 −1.531.162.70[154] a
Ta3N5 −0.751.352.10[155]
TaON −0.751.752.50[156]
Fe2O3 0.282.482.20[157]
Bi2O3 0.333.132.80[158]
BiVO4 −0.302.102.40[159]
WO3 −0.102.702.80[160]
Ag3PO4Cubic0.042.492.45[161]
a Measurement by the valence band X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (VB XPS) spectrum.
Table 3. Advantages and disadvantages of different modification methods for semiconductor.
Table 3. Advantages and disadvantages of different modification methods for semiconductor.
Modification MethodAdvantageDisadvantage
Particle doping- Reduce bandgap- Introduce defects
- Reduce particle size
Precious metal depositing- Enhance electron-hole separation- Expensive
Surface dye photosensitization- Broaden the light response range- Expensive
- Dyes may be photolyzed
Semiconductor compound- Reducing the complex of electron-hole pairs- Energy loss
- Broaden the light response range

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhang, F.; Wang, X.; Liu, H.; Liu, C.; Wan, Y.; Long, Y.; Cai, Z. Recent Advances and Applications of Semiconductor Photocatalytic Technology. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2489. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122489

AMA Style

Zhang F, Wang X, Liu H, Liu C, Wan Y, Long Y, Cai Z. Recent Advances and Applications of Semiconductor Photocatalytic Technology. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(12):2489. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122489

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhang, Fubao, Xianming Wang, Haonan Liu, Chunli Liu, Yong Wan, Yunze Long, and Zhongyu Cai. 2019. "Recent Advances and Applications of Semiconductor Photocatalytic Technology" Applied Sciences 9, no. 12: 2489. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122489

APA Style

Zhang, F., Wang, X., Liu, H., Liu, C., Wan, Y., Long, Y., & Cai, Z. (2019). Recent Advances and Applications of Semiconductor Photocatalytic Technology. Applied Sciences, 9(12), 2489. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122489

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop