Next Article in Journal
Automatic Identification of Bridge Vortex-Induced Vibration Using Random Decrement Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Mapping Areal Precipitation with Fusion Data by ANN Machine Learning in Sparse Gauged Region
Previous Article in Journal
Carbon Footprint of the Agricultural Sector in Qinghai Province, China
Previous Article in Special Issue
Landslide Prediction with Model Switching
Review

A Critical Review of Spatial Predictive Modeling Process in Environmental Sciences with Reproducible Examples in R

by
National Earth and Marine Observations Branch, Environmental Geoscience Division, Geoscience Australia, Canberra 2601, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
Appl. Sci. 2019, 9(10), 2048; https://doi.org/10.3390/app9102048
Received: 22 February 2019 / Revised: 7 May 2019 / Accepted: 13 May 2019 / Published: 17 May 2019
Spatial predictive methods are increasingly being used to generate predictions across various disciplines in environmental sciences. Accuracy of the predictions is critical as they form the basis for environmental management and conservation. Therefore, improving the accuracy by selecting an appropriate method and then developing the most accurate predictive model(s) is essential. However, it is challenging to select an appropriate method and find the most accurate predictive model for a given dataset due to many aspects and multiple factors involved in the modeling process. Many previous studies considered only a portion of these aspects and factors, often leading to sub-optimal or even misleading predictive models. This study evaluates a spatial predictive modeling process, and identifies nine major components for spatial predictive modeling. Each of these nine components is then reviewed, and guidelines for selecting and applying relevant components and developing accurate predictive models are provided. Finally, reproducible examples using spm, an R package, are provided to demonstrate how to select and develop predictive models using machine learning, geostatistics, and their hybrid methods according to predictive accuracy for spatial predictive modeling; reproducible examples are also provided to generate and visualize spatial predictions in environmental sciences. View Full-Text
Keywords: spatial predictive models; predictive accuracy; model assessment; variable selection; feature selection; model validation; spatial predictions; reproducible research spatial predictive models; predictive accuracy; model assessment; variable selection; feature selection; model validation; spatial predictions; reproducible research
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, J. A Critical Review of Spatial Predictive Modeling Process in Environmental Sciences with Reproducible Examples in R. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9102048

AMA Style

Li J. A Critical Review of Spatial Predictive Modeling Process in Environmental Sciences with Reproducible Examples in R. Applied Sciences. 2019; 9(10):2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9102048

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Jin. 2019. "A Critical Review of Spatial Predictive Modeling Process in Environmental Sciences with Reproducible Examples in R" Applied Sciences 9, no. 10: 2048. https://doi.org/10.3390/app9102048

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop