Sensorless Admittance Control for Cable-Driven Synchronous Continuum Robot
Abstract
1. Introduction
- 1.
- A sensorless disturbance observer based on a GM dynamic model is implemented to estimate external torques, enabling compliant control of the SCR without additional force/torque sensors.
- 2.
- A VAC-based motion generation framework is proposed to realize compliant behavior while explicitly incorporating diverse environmental interaction conditions and joint-level constraints.
- 3.
- The effectiveness of the proposed framework is experimentally validated through various scenarios.
2. Structural Configuration of the Cable-Driven Synchronous Continuum Robot
3. Sensorless Disturbance Observer Based on Generalized Momentum
3.1. Parameter Identification of SCR
3.2. Disturbance Observer Based on Generalized Momentum
4. VAC-Based Motion Generation Strategies for SCR
4.1. Variable Parameter for Compliance Motion
4.2. Constraint-Aware Variable Reference and Admittance Parameters
- Reference-level suppression () prevents commanded motion beyond joint limits.
- Parameter-level damping amplification () attenuates externally induced motion near boundaries.
- Reference-level suppression () prevents commanded motion beyond joint limits.
- Parameter-level damping amplification () attenuates externally induced motion near boundaries.
5. Performance Validation
5.1. Experimental Environment
5.2. Experiment for Constrained Motion
5.3. Experiment for Compliance Motion
5.4. Discussion
6. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Burgner-Kahrs, J.; Rucker, D.C.; Choset, H. Continuum Robots for Medical Applications: A survey. IEEE Trans. Robot. 2010, 31, 1261–1280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Webster, R.J., III; Jones, B.A. Design and Kinematic Modeling of Constant Curvature Continuum Robots: A Review. Int. J. Robot. Res. 2010, 29, 1661–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chikhaoui, M.T.; Lilge, S.; Kleinschmidt, S.; Burgner-Kahrs, J. Comparison of modeling approaches for a tendon actuated continuum robot with three extensible segments. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 2019, 4, 989–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Buckingham, R.; Graham, A. Nuclear snake-arm robots. Ind. Robot 2012, 39, 6–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nahar, D.; Yanik, P.M.; Walker, I.D. Robot tendrils: Long, thin continuum robots for inspection in space operations. In Proceedings of the IEEE Aerospace Conference, Big Sky, MT, USA, 8 June 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Anscombe, R.; Bryant, A.; Buckingham, R.; Green, B. Snake-arm robots: A new approach to aircraft assembly. In Aerospace Technology Conference and Exposition; SAE Technical Paper; SAE International: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
- Siciliano, B.; Khatib, O. Springer Handbook of Robotics; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 1349–1360. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Z.; Peer, A.; Buss, M. An HMM approach to realistic haptic human-robot interaction. In Proceedings of the Third Joint EuroHaptics conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 18–20 March 2009. [Google Scholar]
- Pinto-Bernal, M.J.; Cespedes, N.; Castro, P.; Munera, M.; Cifuentes, C.A. Physical Human-Robot Interaction Influence in ASD Therapy Through an Affordable Soft Social Robot. J. Intell. Robot. Syst. 2022, 105, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prasad, V.; Stock-Homburg, R.; Peters, J. Human-Robot Handshaking: A Review. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2022, 14, 277–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; Geng, S.; Walker, I.; Branson, D.T.; Liu, J.; Dai1, J.S.; Kang, R. Geometric constraint based modeling and analysis of a novel continuum robot with SMA initiated variable stiffness. Int. J. Robot. Res. 2020, 39, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, T.; Mu, Z.; Xu, W.; Yang, T.; You, K.; Fu, H. A Improved Mechanical Design and Simplified Motion Planning of Hybrid Active and Passive Cable-Driven Segmented Manipulator with Coupled Motion. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Macau, China, 3–8 November 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, S.; Liang, B.; Wang, T. Dynamic analysis of a hyper-redundant space manipulator with a complex rope network. Aerosp. Sci. Technol. 2020, 100, 105768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zheng, X.; Yang, T.; Zhu, X.; Chen, Z.; Wang, X.; Liang, B. Dynamic modeling and experimental verification of a cable-driven continuum manipulator with cable-constrained synchronous rotating mechanisms. Nonlinear Dyn. 2022, 107, 153–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mira, M.A.; Mousa, O.A.; Fahmy, A.H.; Shehata, O.M.; Morgan, E.I. Investigating Various Force Control Techniques Effect on a Flexible Continuum Robot. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Robot. Res. 2021, 10, 255–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ott, C.; Mukherjee, R.; Nakamura, Y. Unified Impedance and Admittance Control. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, AK, USA, 3–7 May 2010. [Google Scholar]
- Kang, S.H.; Jin, M.; Chang, P.H. A Solution to the Accuracy/Robustness Dilemma in Impedance Control. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 2009, 14, 282–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cho, J.; Choi, D.; Park, J.H. Sensorless Variable Admittance Control for Human–Robot Interaction of a Dual-Arm Social Robot. IEEE Access 2023, 11, 69366–69377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Ge, S.S. Human-robot collaboration based on motion intention estimation. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 2014, 19, 1007–1014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duchaine, V.; Gosselin, C. Investigation of human-robot interaction stability using Lyapunov theory. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Pasadena, CA, USA, 19–23 May 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Sun, T.; Wang, Z.; He, C.; Yang, L. Adaptive Robust Admittance Control of Robots Using Duality Principle-Based Impedance Selection. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 12222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, C.; Li, Z. Force tracking smooth adaptive admittance control in unknown environment. Robotica 2023, 41, 1991–2011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kang, G.; Oh, H.S.; Seo, J.K.; Kim, U.; Choi, H.R. Variable admittance control of robot manipulators based on human intention. IEEE/ASME Trans. Mechatronics 2019, 24, 1023–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kronander, K.; Billard, A. A online learning of varying stiffness through physical human–robot interaction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Saint Paul, MN, USA, 14–18 May 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Kormushev, P.; Calinon, S.; Caldwell, D.G. Robot motor skill coordination with EM-based Reinforcement Learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Taipei, Taiwan, 18–22 October 2010. [Google Scholar]
- He, W.; Xue, C.; Yu, X.; Li, Z.; Yang, C. Admittance-Based Controller Design for Physical Human–Robot Interaction in the Constrained Task Space. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 2020, 17, 1937–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhan, H.; Huang, D.; Yang, C. Adaptive dynamic programming enhanced admittance control for robots with environment interaction and actuator saturation. Int. J. Intell. Robot. Appl. 2021, 5, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahman, M.; Ikeura, R.; Mizutani, K. Investigating the impedance characteristic of human arm for development of robots to co-operate with human operators. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Tokyo, Japan, 12–15 October 1999. [Google Scholar]
- Duan, J.; Gan, Y.; Chen, M.; Dai, X. Adaptive variable impedance control for dynamic contact force tracking in uncertain environment. Robot. Auton. Syst. 2018, 102, 54–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, X.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, M.; Liu, X. Disturbance Recognition and Collision Detection of Manipulator Based on Momentum Observer. Sensors 2020, 20, 4187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Swevers, J.; Verdonck, W.; De Schutter, J. Dynamic Model Identification for Industrial Robots. IEEE Control Syst. Mag. 2007, 27, 58–71. [Google Scholar]
- Jin, J.; Gans, N. Parameter identification for industrial robots with a fast and robust trajectory design approach. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2015, 31, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, T.; Lee, B.D.; Park, F.C. Optimal excitation trajectories for mechanical systems identification. Automatica 2021, 131, 109773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jung, D.; Do, H.; Choi, T.; Park, J.; Cheong, J. Robust Parameter Estimation of Robot Manipulators Using Torque Separation Technique. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 150443–150458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, C.; Peng, G.; Cheng, L.; Na, J.; Li, Z. Force Sensorless Admittance Control for Teleoperation of Uncertain Robot Manipulator Using Neural Networks. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Syst. 2021, 51, 3282–3292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wahrburg, A.; Morara, E.; Cesari, G.; Matthias, B.; Ding, H. Cartesian contact force estimation for robotic manipulators using Kalman filters and the generalized momentum. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Automation Science and Engineering, Gothenburg, Sweden, 24–28 August 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, S.; Wang, L.; Wang, X.V. Sensorless force estimation for industrial robots using disturbance observer and neural learning of friction approximation. Robot. Comput.-Integr. Manuf. 2021, 71, 102168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, J.; Ouyang, Y.; Yin, L.; Shi, Z.; Zhou, C.; Wang, H.; Hu, B. Advancing wind turbine gearbox durability with eco-friendly GO nanolubricants: CFD simulation–experiment synergy for understanding flow dynamics, wear suppression and surface restoration mechanisms. Tribol. Int. 2026, 213, 111034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
















| l | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 40 | 10 | 20 | 40 | 60 | 80 | 110 | |
| −100 | 100 | −100 | 100 | 70 | −70 | 30 | −30 |
| Resolution | Stall Torque | RPM | Gear Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4096 PPR | 9.9 Nm | 39.0 | 272.5:1 |
| Description | Value |
|---|---|
| Coefficent for mass (M) | 0.3 |
| Coefficent for slow response () | 5.0 |
| Coefficent for fast response () | 4.0 |
| Coefficent for active motion () | 0.2 |
| Coefficent for compliance motion () | 0.0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Kim, M.-O.; Cho, J.; Choi, D.; Seo, T.; Lee, D.-W. Sensorless Admittance Control for Cable-Driven Synchronous Continuum Robot. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 3637. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16083637
Kim M-O, Cho J, Choi D, Seo T, Lee D-W. Sensorless Admittance Control for Cable-Driven Synchronous Continuum Robot. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(8):3637. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16083637
Chicago/Turabian StyleKim, Myung-Oh, Jaeuk Cho, Dongwoon Choi, TaeWon Seo, and Dong-Wook Lee. 2026. "Sensorless Admittance Control for Cable-Driven Synchronous Continuum Robot" Applied Sciences 16, no. 8: 3637. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16083637
APA StyleKim, M.-O., Cho, J., Choi, D., Seo, T., & Lee, D.-W. (2026). Sensorless Admittance Control for Cable-Driven Synchronous Continuum Robot. Applied Sciences, 16(8), 3637. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16083637

