Hydro-Mechanical Coupling Behavior of Cemented Silty Sand in Zones with Fluctuating Water Levels: An Empirical Damage Model
Featured Application
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Area and Stratigraphic Characterization
2.2. Soil Sampling and Baseline Characterization
2.3. Statistical Methods
2.4. Multifactor Coupled Orthogonal Experiment Design
2.5. Framework of Water-Sensitive Damage Model
3. Results and Analysis
3.1. Statistical Identification of Dominant Variables and Conceptual Framework
3.2. Quantitative Decoupling of Hydro-Mechanical Factors
3.3. Formulation and Validation of the Dual-Path Damage Model
3.3.1. Derivation of Water-Sensitive Damage Equation Based on Experimental Data
3.3.2. Dual-Path Non-Linear Water-Sensitive Degradation Model for Strength Parameters
- Initial Baseline Parameters (c0 and φ0).
- 2.
- Joint Analytical Resolution of Phase-transition Parameters (m, η) and Absolute Residuals (cr, φr).
- 3.
- Establishment of the Dual-path Non-linear Evolution Equations.
3.3.3. Establishment and Validation of the Modified Mohr–Coulomb Model
- State I (Sc = 30%, ρ = 1.5 g/cm3).
- 2.
- State II (Sc = 20%, ρ = 1.6 g/cm3).
4. Discussion
4.1. Micro-Physical Mechanisms of Asynchronous Strength Degradation
4.2. State-Dependency and Universality of the Constitutive Framework
4.3. Engineering Implications for the Yellow River Floodplain
4.4. Limitations and Future Perspectives
5. Conclusions
- Dominance of Moisture-Induced Damage
- 2.
- Asynchronous Degradation Mechanisms
- 3.
- State-dependency and Robust Generalizability
- 4.
- Socio-Environmental Risks and Policy Implications
Author Contributions
Funding
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Xie, D.; Yao, Y.; Dang, F. Advanced Soil Mechanics; Higher Education Press: Beijing, China, 2008. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, H.; Zheng, J. Present Status of Land Subsidence Research. Geol. Surv. Res. 2009, 33, 236–240. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, L.; Wang, S.; Li, G.; Wang, L. Numerical analysis on deformation of reservoir landslides considering coupling effect of seepage and creep. Adv. Eng. Sci. 2020, 52, 66–74. [Google Scholar]
- Cui, Z.; Tang, Y. Domestic and International Recent Situation and Research of Land Subsidence Disasters. Northwestern Seismol. J. 2007, 29, 275–278. [Google Scholar]
- Khairy, H.; Sarfi, M. Land subsidence in Iran: An omnipresent geohazard. Geol. Today 2024, 40, 187–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ministry of Land and Resources of the People’s Republic of China. China Land and Resources Statistical Yearbook; Ministry of Land and Resources of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Qin, M.; Yang, J.; Bai, Y.; Bai, Y. The subsidence–distance relationship for land subsidence induced by groundwater abstraction. Hydrogeol. J. 2024, 33, 205–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Erkens, G.; Bucx, T.; Dam, R.; de Lange, G.; Lambert, J. Sinking coastal cities. Proc. Int. Assoc. Hydrol. Sci. 2015, 372, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, H.; Du, J.; Luo, Z.; Zhang, Y. Coupling effect of building load and groundwater extraction on ground settlement. J. Jiangsu Univ. 2023, 44, 599–605. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, H.; Xue, Y.; Qiu, D. Numerical simulation of the land subsidence induced by groundwater mining. Cluster Comput. 2023, 26, 3647–3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Terzaghi, K.T. Theoretical Soil Mechanics; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1943. [Google Scholar]
- Terzaghi, K.T.; Peck, R.B.; Mesri, G. Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice. Soil Sci. 1996, 68, 149–150. [Google Scholar]
- Biot, M.A. General Theory of Three-Dimensional Consolidation. J. Appl. Phys. 1941, 12, 155–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Wang, X. A Dynamic Boundary Theory for Porous Medium with Fluid-Solid Coupling. Eng. Mech. 2002, 19, 97–102. [Google Scholar]
- Xu, J.; Yang, W.; Chen, Z.; Wang, S.W. One-dimensional Viscoelastic Consolidation Analysis of Aquifer–Aquitard Due to Drawdown of Water Level. Adv. Eng. Sci. 2021, 53, 89–97. [Google Scholar]
- Jiang, Z.; He, Y.; Zhao, G.; Li, Z.; Yuan, Q.; Liu, L. Quantitative Evaluation of the Spatial Variation of Surface Soil Properties in a Typical Alluvial Plain of the Lower Yellow River Using Classical Statistics, Geostatistics and Single Fractal and Multifractal Methods. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 5796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuang, H. Strength and Particle Breakage Behavior of Calcareous Sands. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China, 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Lv, Y.; Ding, S.; Li, X.; Su, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zuo, D. Cyclic shear characteristics and shear strength weakening mechanism of calcareous sand. Chin. J. Rock Mech. Eng. 2024, 43, 2811–2822. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, X.; Guo, J.; Chen, Y.; Han, Y.; Yi, R.; Gao, H.; Liu, L.; Liu, H.; Shen, Z. Mechanical Properties and Engineering Applications of Special Soils—Dynamic Shear Modulus and Damping of MICP-Treated Calcareous Sand at Low Strains. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 12175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ye, Y.; Yan, C.; Luo, X.; Zhang, R.; Yuan, G. Analysis of ground subsidence along Zhengzhou metro based on time series InSAR. Natl. Remote Sens. Bull. 2022, 26, 1342–1353. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, B.; Zhu, L.; Pan, D.; Guo, L.; Peng, P. Research on temporal and spatial evolution law of land subsidence in Zhengzhou. Remote Sens. Land Resour. 2020, 32, 143–148. [Google Scholar]
- Sui, Q.; Chen, W.; Wang, L. Investigation of Nonlinear Flow in Discrete Fracture Networks Using an Improved Hydro-Mechanical Coupling Model. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 3027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, V.T.; Huynh, V.T.M.; Avtar, R.; Kumar, P.; Huynh, V.H.; Kurasaki, M. Spatiotemporal variations in groundwater levels and the impact on land subsidence in CanTho, Vietnam. Groundw. Sustain. Dev. 2021, 15, 100680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shi, F.; Tang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Zhu, F.; Ye, S. Spatial-temporal Evolution Characteristics and Causes of Land Subsidence in Typical Area of Eastern Guangdong Province. Saf. Environ. Eng. 2019, 26, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Alidaryan, M.; Khosravi, M.H.; Bahaaddini, M.; Moosavi, M.; Roshan, H. Mobilization of Cohesion and Friction Angle of Intact Rocks in the Shearing Process. Rock Mech. Rock Eng. 2023, 56, 8221–8233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, H.; Pel, L.; You, Z.; Smeulders, D. Stress-dependent instantaneous cohesion and friction angle for the Mohr–Coulomb criterion. Int. J. Mech. Sci. 2024, 283, 109652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdulhadi, N.O.; Germaine, J.T.; Whittle, A.J. Stress-Dependent Behavior of Saturated Clay. Can. Geotech. J. 2012, 49, 907–916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xu, J.; Li, Y.; Ren, C.; Lan, W. Damage of saline intact loess after dry-wet and its interpretation based on SEM and NMR. Soils Found. 2020, 60, 911–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fan, B.J.; Zhao, F.J.; Zhang, Z.T.; Liu, Y.H. Experimental Study on the Disintegration Properties of Red Sandstone. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2021, 40, 2077–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Qin, Z.; Fu, H.; Chen, X. A study on altered granite meso-damage mechanisms due to water invasion-water loss cycles. Environ. Earth Sci. 2019, 78, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, Z.; Lun, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, W.; Wang, S.; Zhao, L.; Liu, S. Water-induced damage mechanism and dual-radius grouting control of weakly cemented argillaceous roadways in Western China. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 45325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Q.; Huang, M.; Xu, K.; Cui, M. Statistical damage constitutive model of MICP-treated calcareous sand. J. Eng. Geol. 2024, 32, 1526–1535. [Google Scholar]
- GB/T50123-2019; Standard for Soil Test Methods. Ministry of Housing and Urban Rural Development of the People’s Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2019.








| No. | Borehole Number | h (m) | ω (%) | ρ (g/cm3) | Gs (g/cm3) | av | Es (MPa) | c (kPa) | φ (°) | Sc (%) | Liquid Limit (%) | Soil Type |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Z7-2 | 3.3 | 15.9 | 1.51 | 2.7 | 0.058 | 28.71 | 22 | 21.5 | 26.1 | 15.2 | Silt |
| 2 | Z7-3 | 6 | 17.6 | 1.67 | 2.7 | 0.115 | 14.09 | 18 | 23 | 29 | 15.4 | Silt |
| 3 | Z7-6 | 14 | 21.5 | 1.62 | 2.7 | 0.166 | 10.57 | 11 | 17.5 | 31.6 | 15.3 | Silt |
| 4 | Z7-7 | 17 | 18.6 | 1.67 | 2.7 | 0.136 | 12.02 | 16 | 15 | 29 | 15.4 | Silt |
| 5 | Z3-1 | 1.8 | 22.8 | 1.60 | 2.7 | 0.178 | 9.51 | 11 | 17.5 | 20.3 | 15.5 | Silt |
| 6 | Z3-7 | 15.8 | 20.7 | 1.64 | 2.7 | 0.155 | 10.62 | 14 | 20.5 | 20.8 | 15.8 | Silt |
| 7 | Z4-2 | 3.1 | 20.1 | 1.54 | 2.7 | 0.215 | 8.15 | 12 | 20 | 19.5 | 15.3 | Silt |
| 8 | Z4-3 | 4.9 | 19.8 | 1.44 | 2.7 | 0.245 | 7.63 | 11 | 16.5 | 14 | 15.1 | Silt |
| 9 | Z4-7 | 15.4 | 19 | 1.66 | 2.7 | 0.142 | 11.49 | 17 | 19 | 25.6 | 15.1 | Silt |
| 10 | Z4-8 | 17.4 | 17.5 | 1.65 | 2.7 | 0.053 | 30.51 | 21 | 22 | 26.3 | 14.8 | Silt |
| 11 | Z4-13 | 20.3 | 18.3 | 1.66 | 2.7 | 0.121 | 13.4 | 17 | 20 | 28.1 | 15.0 | Silt |
| 12 | Z5-5 | 9.8 | 24 | 1.57 | 2.7 | 0.215 | 7.99 | 19 | 15 | 17.7 | 15.8 | Silt |
| 13 | Z6-3 | 10.4 | 18.2 | 1.67 | 2.7 | 0.123 | 13.17 | 17 | 22 | 27.8 | 15.4 | Silt |
| 14 | Z6-4 | 13.4 | 20.6 | 1.64 | 2.7 | 0.149 | 11.03 | 11 | 19 | 25 | 15.2 | Silt |
| 15 | Z8-2 | 3.8 | 25.4 | 1.54 | 2.7 | 0.222 | 8.05 | 9 | 21.5 | 24 | 17.3 | Silt |
| 16 | Z8-3 | 5.8 | 19.6 | 1.63 | 2.7 | 0.147 | 11.27 | 12 | 20.5 | 25.3 | 15.5 | Silt |
| 17 | Z9-5 | 7.8 | 20 | 1.64 | 2.7 | 0.14 | 11.75 | 11 | 18 | 25.9 | 15.3 | Silt |
| 18 | Z9-6 | 9.8 | 19.4 | 1.66 | 2.7 | 0.128 | 12.72 | 16 | 18 | 27.2 | 15.3 | Silt |
| 19 | Z9-7 | 11.8 | 21.6 | 1.62 | 2.7 | 0.146 | 11.41 | 12 | 19.5 | 25.5 | 15.1 | Silt |
| 20 | Z10-11 | 16.8 | 25.4 | 1.56 | 2.72 | 0.14 | 12.43 | 4 | 23 | 98.5 | / | Fine Sand |
| 21 | Z1-6 | 10 | 18 | 1.67 | 2.7 | 0.157 | 10.3 | 9 | 19 | 96.2 | / | Fine Sand |
| 22 | Z1-9 | 17 | 19.2 | 1.66 | 2.7 | 0.154 | 10.55 | 6 | 18.5 | 92.9 | / | Fine Sand |
| 23 | Z2-1 | 1.8 | 24.5 | 1.54 | 2.7 | 0.195 | 8.98 | 9 | 17 | 86.2 | / | Fine Sand |
| 24 | Z2-2 | 3.8 | 30.9 | 1.44 | 2.7 | 0.247 | 7.61 | 6 | 16 | 93.8 | / | Fine Sand |
| 25 | Z2-4 | 7.8 | 18.8 | 1.66 | 2.7 | 0.124 | 13.13 | 12 | 21 | 90.5 | / | Fine Sand |
| 26 | Z2-5 | 9.8 | 17.2 | 1.66 | 2.7 | 0.117 | 13.87 | 7 | 20 | 92.9 | / | Fine Sand |
| 27 | ZDT1-1 | 2 | 22.6 | 1.44 | 2.7 | 0.263 | 7.15 | 6 | 19 | 92.7 | / | Fine Sand |
| 28 | ZDT1-2 | 3 | 21.2 | 1.62 | 2.7 | 0.143 | 11.62 | 9 | 19 | 89 | / | Fine Sand |
| 29 | ZDT2-2 | 5.5 | 24.7 | 1.57 | 2.7 | 0.153 | 11.23 | 11 | 18 | 76.6 | / | Fine Sand |
| Level | Sc | ρ | ω | Confining Pressure |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 15% | 1.4 g/cm3 | 15% | 100 kPa |
| 2 | 30% | 1.5 g/cm3 | 20% | 200 kPa |
| 3 | 45% | 1.6 g/cm3 | 25% | 300 kPa |
| No. | Experimental Factors and Level Design | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sc | ρ | ω | Confining Pressure | |
| 1 | 15% | 1.4 g/cm3 | 15% | 100 kPa |
| 2 | 15% | 1.5 g/cm3 | 20% | 200 kPa |
| 3 | 15% | 1.6 g/cm3 | 25% | 300 kPa |
| 4 | 30% | 1.4 g/cm3 | 20% | 300kPa |
| 5 | 30% | 1.5 g/cm3 | 25% | 100kPa |
| 6 | 30% | 1.6 g/cm3 | 15% | 200kPa |
| 7 | 45% | 1.4 g/cm3 | 25% | 200 kPa |
| 8 | 45% | 1.5 g/cm3 | 15% | 300 kPa |
| 9 | 45% | 1.6 g/cm3 | 20% | 100 kPa |
| No. | Experimental Factors and Level Design | qf | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sc | ρ | ω | Confining Pressure | ||
| 1 | 15% | 1.4 g/cm3 | 15% | 100 kPa | 301.63 kPa |
| 2 | 15% | 1.5 g/cm3 | 20% | 200 kPa | 251.14 kPa |
| 3 | 15% | 1.6 g/cm3 | 25% | 300 kPa | 97.95 kPa |
| 4 | 30% | 1.4 g/cm3 | 20% | 300 kPa | 280.92 kPa |
| 5 | 30% | 1.5 g/cm3 | 25% | 100 kPa | 62.38 kPa |
| 6 | 30% | 1.6 g/cm3 | 15% | 200 kPa | 596.63 kPa |
| 7 | 45% | 1.4 g/cm3 | 25% | 200 kPa | 48.14 kPa |
| 8 | 45% | 1.5 g/cm3 | 15% | 300 kPa | 614.09 kPa |
| 9 | 45% | 1.6 g/cm3 | 20% | 100 kPa | 233.91 kPa |
| Sc | ρ | ω | Confining Pressure | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Level 1mean | 216.91 | 210.23 | 504.12 | 199.31 |
| Level 2mean | 313.31 | 309.20 | 255.32 | 298.64 |
| Level 3mean | 298.71 | 309.50 | 69.49 | 330.99 |
| Range | 96.40 | 99.27 | 434.63 | 131.68 |
| Variance contribution rate (%) | 4.64 | 5.62 | 81.65 | 8.09 |
| Validation Group | Initial State (Sc, ρ) | Initial Parameters (c0, φ0) | Test Condition (ω, σ3) | Experimental qf(exp) | Predicted qf(cal) | Relative Error |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group 1 (State I) | 30%, 1.5 g/cm3 | c0 = 21.4 kPa, φ0 = 17.9° | 17%, 100 kPa | 124.70 kPa | 135.12 kPa | 8.36% |
| Group 2 (State I) | 30%, 1.5 g/cm3 | c0 = 21.4 kPa, φ0 = 17.9° | 20%, 100 kPa | 122.56 kPa | 105.98 kPa | −13.53% |
| Group 3 (State I) | 30%, 1.5 g/cm3 | c0 = 21.4 kPa, φ0 = 17.9° | 25%, 100 kPa | 62.38 kPa | 71.88 kPa | 15.23% |
| Group 4 (State II) | 20%, 1.6 g/cm3 | c0 = 20.3 kPa, φ0 = 16.6° | 18%, 100 kPa | 139.28 kPa | 114.68 kPa | −17.66% |
| Group 5 (State II) | 20%, 1.6 g/cm3 | c0 = 20.3 kPa, φ0 = 16.6° | 21%, 100 kPa | 95.32 kPa | 88.46 kPa | −7.20% |
| Group 6 (State II) | 20%, 1.6 g/cm3 | c0 = 20.3 kPa, φ0 = 16.6° | 24%, 100 kPa | 64.17 kPa | 69.91 kPa | 8.95% |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
Bi, J.; Wang, J.; Sun, W.; Wang, S. Hydro-Mechanical Coupling Behavior of Cemented Silty Sand in Zones with Fluctuating Water Levels: An Empirical Damage Model. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 3614. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16083614
Bi J, Wang J, Sun W, Wang S. Hydro-Mechanical Coupling Behavior of Cemented Silty Sand in Zones with Fluctuating Water Levels: An Empirical Damage Model. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(8):3614. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16083614
Chicago/Turabian StyleBi, Junbo, Jingjing Wang, Weichao Sun, and Shuaiwei Wang. 2026. "Hydro-Mechanical Coupling Behavior of Cemented Silty Sand in Zones with Fluctuating Water Levels: An Empirical Damage Model" Applied Sciences 16, no. 8: 3614. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16083614
APA StyleBi, J., Wang, J., Sun, W., & Wang, S. (2026). Hydro-Mechanical Coupling Behavior of Cemented Silty Sand in Zones with Fluctuating Water Levels: An Empirical Damage Model. Applied Sciences, 16(8), 3614. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16083614
