Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Mud Diapirism Dynamics in Membrillal, Cartagena de Indias: Implications for Rural Communities and Susceptibility Assessment
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Experimental Area
2.1. Disaster Risk Management and Cultural Conditions in Membrillal
2.1.1. Cultural Expressions of the Community
2.1.2. Mechanisms for Disaster Risk Management
3. Materials and Methods
3.1. Survey Instrument Design and Operationalization
- Structural: Dwelling construction quality, visible damage (cracking and settlement), and foundation stability under diapiric deformation;
- Socioeconomic: Household composition, income sources, residence duration, and housing tenure status;
- Geotechnical: Proximity to active vents, reported mud extrusion events, and evidence of ground fissuring or moisture infiltration.
3.2. Statistical Analysis
3.3. Data Processing
3.4. Water and Gas Sampling from Volcano Vents
3.4.1. Water Sampling and Preservation
3.4.2. Gas Sampling and Preservation
3.5. Laboratory Analytical Procedures
3.5.1. Water Laboratory Test
3.5.2. Gas Testing
3.6. Spatio-Temporal Analysis
3.7. Data Compilation and Preparation—Susceptibility Mapping
Data Compilation and Standardization
3.8. Methodological Limitations
4. Results and Discussion
4.1. Sample Size from the Community
4.2. Statistical Analysis-Results
4.2.1. Reliability and Internal Consistency of Survey Dimensions
4.2.2. Intradimensional Correlation (Spearman Analysis)
4.2.3. PCA Adequacy and Component Structure
- Component 1 (eigenvalue = 3.82, 34.8% variance) loaded structural damage indicators;
- Component 2 (eigenvalue = 1.94, 17.6% variance) loaded geotechnical risk factors;
- Component 3 (eigenvalue = 1.26, 11.5% variance) loaded socioeconomic vulnerability.
4.3. Physicochemical Analysis from Water Samples
4.4. Gas Sampling Analysis
4.5. Spatio-Temporal Results
4.5.1. Baseline 2013 to 2016 Analysis
4.5.2. Early Urban Expansion and Associated Diapiric Subsurface Pressurization (2016–2021)
4.5.3. 2021–2023 Acceleration of Deformation and Event Recurrence
4.5.4. 2024: Consolidation of High-Risk Morphology
4.6. Susceptibility to Mud Diapirism
5. Conclusions
Future Research Directions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Chen, S.-C.; Hsu, S.-K.; Wang, Y.; Chung, S.-H.; Chen, P.-C.; Tsai, C.-H.; Liu, C.-S.; Lin, H.-S.; Lee, Y.-W. Distribution and characters of the mud diapirs and mud volcanoes off southwest Taiwan. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2014, 92, 201–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rossello, E.A.; Osorio, J.A.; López-Isaza, S. The argilokinetic diapirism of the Colombian Caribbean Margin: A review of its sedimentary conditioning factors applied to hydrocarbon exploration. Bol. Geol. 2022, 44, 15–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Baldovino, J.J.A.; Pitalua, D.L.B. Evaluación de la Amenaza Potencial del Volcanismo de Lodo, que Incide en la Parte Urbanística de las Zonas de ‘Turbaco’, ‘El Rodeo’, ‘Membrillal’ y ‘Bayunca’ del Departamento de Bolívar; Universidad de Cartagena: Cartagena, Colombia, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Kopf, A.J. Significance of mud volcanism. Rev. Geophys. 2002, 40, 2-1–2-52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazzini, A.; Etiope, G. Mud volcanism: An updated review. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2017, 168, 81–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dimitrov, L.I. Mud volcanoes—The most important pathway for degassing deeply buried sediments. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2002, 59, 49–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bonini, M. Mud volcanoes: Indicators of stress orientation and tectonic controls. Earth-Sci. Rev. 2012, 115, 121–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Milkov, A.V. Worldwide distribution of submarine mud volcanoes and associated gas hydrates. Mar. Geol. 2000, 167, 29–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Napoli, S.; Spatola, D.; Casalbore, D.; Lombardo, L.; Tanyas, H.; Chiocci, F.L. Comprehensive global inventory of submarine mud volcanoes. Sci. Data 2025, 12, 382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franek, P.; Mienert, J.; Buenz, S.; Géli, L. Character of seismic motion at a location of a gas hydrate-bearing mud volcano on the SW Barents Sea margin. J. Geophys. Res. Solid Earth 2014, 119, 6159–6177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mazzini, A.; Akhmanov, G.; Manga, M.; Sciarra, A.; Huseynova, A.; Huseynov, A.; Guliyev, I. Explosive mud volcano eruptions and rafting of mud breccia blocks. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2021, 555, 116699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fontana, M.; Bernardi, M.S.; Cigna, F.; Tapete, D.; Menafoglio, A.; Vantini, S. Identification of Precursors in InSAR Time Series Using Functional Data Analysis Post-Processing: Demonstration on Mud Volcano Eruptions. Remote Sens. 2024, 16, 1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ahadov, B.; Fielding, E.; Kadirov, F. Far-Field Earthquake-Induced Crustal Deformation and Mud Volcano Activity in Azerbaijan Based on the InSAR Technique. Remote Sens. 2025, 17, 1421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Iio, K.; Furuya, M. Surface deformation and source modeling of Ayaz-Akhtarma mud volcano, Azerbaijan, as detected by ALOS/ALOS-2 InSAR. Prog. Earth Planet. Sci. 2018, 5, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gattuso, A.; Italiano, F.; Capasso, G.; D’Alessandro, A.; Grassa, F.; Pisciotta, A.F.; Romano, D. The mud volcanoes at Santa Barbara and Aragona (Sicily, Italy): A contribution to risk assessment. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2021, 21, 3407–3419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amici, S.; Turci, M.; Giulietti, F.; Giammanco, S.; Buongiorno, M.F.; La Spina, A.; Spampinato, L. Volcanic Environments Monitoring by Drones Mud Volcano Case Study. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2013, 40, 5–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mihai, A.; Gerea, A.; Tataru, D.; Nastase, E.; Grecu, B. A Geophysical Investigation of the Pâclele Mici Mud Volcano in Romania Using Deep Geoelectrical Surveys. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tonini, R.; Sandri, L.; Thompson, M.A. PyBetVH: A Python tool for probabilistic volcanic hazard assessment and for generation of Bayesian hazard curves and maps. Comput. Geosci. 2015, 79, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marzocchi, W.; Sandri, L.; Selva, J. BET_VH: A probabilistic tool for long-term volcanic hazard assessment. Bull. Volcanol. 2010, 72, 705–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dewi, C.; Astika, I.W.; Pramono, G.H. Assessment of Mud Volcano Vulnerable Area in Sidoarjo Regency, East Java Province, Indonesia. J. Appl. Sci. Res. 2011, 7, 722–731. [Google Scholar]
- Garthwaite, M.C.; Miller, V.L.; Saunders, S.; Parks, M.M.; Hu, G.; Parker, A.L. A Simplified Approach to Operational InSAR Monitoring of Volcano Deformation in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Case Study of Rabaul Caldera, Papua New Guinea. Front. Earth Sci. 2019, 6, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takarada, S. The Volcanic Hazards Assessment Support System for the Online Hazard Assessment and Risk Mitigation of Quaternary Volcanoes in the World. Front. Earth Sci. 2017, 5, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramos, E.L.; Penagos, F.G.; Martínez, D.A.R.; Gómez, N.R.M. Detachment levels of Colombian caribbean mud volcanoes. CTF—Cienc. Tecnol. Y Futuro 2022, 12, 49–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Paniagua-Arroyave, J.F.; Spada, G.; Melini, D.; Duque-Trujillo, J.F. Holocene relative sea-level changes along the Caribbean and Pacific coasts of northwestern South America. Quat. Res. 2024, 119, 28–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di Luccio, D.; Guerra, I.M.B.; Valero, L.E.C.; Giraldo, D.F.M.; Maggi, S.; Palmisano, M. Physical and geochemical characteristics of land mud volcanoes along Colombia’s Caribbean coast and their societal impacts. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 759, 144225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Palmisano, M.; Balassone, G.; Maggi, S.; Arenas, A.A.; Guerra, I.M.B.; Valero, L.E.C.; Ippolito, F.; Mondillo, N.; Giraldo, D.F.M.; Mormone, A.; et al. Geochemistry and mineralogy of muds and thermal waters from mud volcanoes in the NW Caribbean Coast of Colombia and their potential for pelotherapy. Catena 2023, 235, 107621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trejos-Tamayo, R.; Vallejo, F.; Arias, V.; García, C.; Pardo-Trujillo, A.; Bedoya, E.; Flores, J.-A. Biostratigraphy of ejected material from mud volcanoes in the Caribbean region of Colombia: Contribution to the stratigraphy of Sinú Basin. J. S. Am. Earth Sci. 2020, 103, 102782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blaskovic, T. Major Eruption of Cacahual (El Aburrido) mud Volcano in Antioquia, Colombia Injures Eight, Damage Homes; The Watchers: Antioquia, Colombia, 2024. [Google Scholar]
- Bautista Manga, L.A.; Rada López, D.; Miranda, B. Evaluación de la Amenaza Geológica Potencial del Volcanismo de Lodo en la Vereda de Membrillal Distrito Turístico y Cultural de Cartagena de Indias. Doctoral Dissertation, Universidad de Cartagena, Cartagena, Colombia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Barboza-Miranda, G.; Macías, A.C.L.; Valdez-Vargas, J.; Pérez-Barón, M.; Rosa, Y.E.N.d.l.; de Diego, G.E.F.; Carrascal, J.J.; Baldovino, J.A. Geophysical-Geotechnical Characterization of Mud Volcanoes in Cartagena Colombia. Geosciences 2025, 15, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- CARDIQUE. Evaluación de la Amenaza Geológica Producida por el Fenómeno Diapirismo de Lodo en la Vereda Membrillal—Distrito de Cartagena de Indias y Corregimiento de Flamenco, Municipio de Marialabaja—Jurisdicción de Cardique; Universidad de Cartagena: Cartagena, Colombia, 2013. [Google Scholar]
- Wong. Cantadoras de Membrillal: Artesanía Musical de la Comunidad al Mundo. UdeC Radio. Available online: https://www.udecradio.co/2023/08/cantadoras-de-membrillal-artesania.html (accessed on 6 October 2025).
- Cartagena, C. Comedor Infantil de Membrillal en Cartagena Atenderá a 100 Niños. CARACOL RADIO. Available online: https://caracol.com.co/2024/04/06/comedor-infantil-de-membrillal-en-cartagena-atendera-a-100-ninos/?fbclid=PAAaYCW2laJNgZITtZI9cQax5m5GTb213cUbN2-bnz0DWGMh7kBYnLW020yW8_aem_AURqWPHAS8mG1DCjQKCDWbhB5aRvVjPc-BO1dipufB25oLqHA_zdUgH_b9BPV_4VlBI (accessed on 6 October 2025).
- Congreso de Colombia. Ley 1523 de 2012 por la cual se Adopta la Política Nacional de Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres y se Establece el Sistema Nacional de Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres y se Dictan Otras Disposiciones; Congreso de Colombia.: Bogotá, Colombia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Cronbach, L.J. Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16, 297–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cutter, S.L.; Boruff, B.J.; Shirley, W.L. Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards. Soc. Sci. Q 2003, 84, 242–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- DANE. Censo Poblacional de Cartagena de Indias; Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística: Cartagena, Colombia, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- ISO/IEC 17025:2017; General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2017.
- Standard Methods Committee of the American Public Health Association; American Water Works Association; Water Environment Federation. 3030 Preliminary Treatment of Samples. In Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 200.8: Determination of Trace Elements in Waters and Wastes by Inductively Coupled Plasma—Mass Spectrometry; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1994. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-08/documents/method_200-8_rev_5-4_1994.pdf (accessed on 16 November 2025).
- U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Method 300.0: Determination of Inorganic Anions by Ion Chromatography; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development: Cincinnati, OH, USA, 1993. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2015-08/documents/method_300-0_rev_2-1_1993.pdf (accessed on 16 November 2025).
- American Public Health Association; American Water Works Association; Water Environment Federation. Method 2540 B: Solids—Total Solids Dried at 103–105 °C. In Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- American Public Health Association; American Water Works Association; Water Environment Federation. Method 2540 E: Solids—Fixed and Volatile Solids Ignited at 550 °C. In Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- American Public Health Association; American Water Works Association; Water Environment Federation. Method 2540 D: Solids—Total Suspended Solids Dried at 103–105 °C. In Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- American Public Health Association; American Water Works Association; Water Environment Federation. Method 2510 B: Conductivity—Laboratory Method. In Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- American Public Health Association; American Water Works Association; Water Environment Federation. Method 4500-H+ B: pH Value—Electrometric Method. In Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- American Public Health Association; American Water Works Association; Water Environment Federation. Method 2550 B: Temperature—Laboratory and Field Methods. In Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 23rd ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
- OARGD. Informe Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres de Cartagena de Indias—807—22; Oficina Asesora para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres: Cartagena, Colombia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- OAGRD. Informe Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres de Cartagena de Indias—739—2022; Oficina Asesora para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres: Cartagena, Colombia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- OAGRD. Informe Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres de Cartagena de Indias—523—22; Oficina Asesora para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres: Cartagena, Colombia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- OAGRD. Informe Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres de Cartagena de Indias—306—21; Oficina Asesora para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres: Cartagena, Colombia, 2021; pp. 1–18. [Google Scholar]
- OAGRD. Informe Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres de Cartagena de Indias—174ª—22; Oficina Asesora para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres: Cartagena, Colombia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- OAGRD. Informe de Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres de Cartagena de Indias—880—22; Oficina Asesora para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres: Cartagena, Colombia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- OAGRD. Informe de Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres de Cartagena de Indias—781—22; Oficina Asesora para la Gestión del Riesgo de Desastres: Cartagena, Colombia, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- Escobar, J.D.U.; Gomez, H.Z.; Cordoba, J.H.T.; Rico, C.E.S. Informe de Coyuntura Económica Regional Departamento de Bolívar 2010 Convenio Interadministrativo No. 111 de abril de 2000 Comité Directivo Nacional ICER Comité Directivo Territorial ICER Entidades Participantes; DANE: Quezon, Philippines, 2011. [Google Scholar]











| Dimension | Variable Code | Indicator Description 1 | Measurement Scale | Coding Scheme |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structural | V1_EST | Presence of structural cracks in walls, floors, or ceilings | Binary nominal | 0 = No visible cracks; 1 = Cracks present |
| V2_EST | Predominant orientation of visible cracks | Ordinal category | 0 = No cracks; 1 = Horizontal; 2 = Vertical; 3 = Diagonal | |
| V3_EST | Maximum crack width | Ordinal category | 0 = No cracks; 1 = 0.4–0.8 mm; 2 = 0.9–1.5 mm; 3 = >1.5 mm | |
| V4_EST | Resident-reported overall condition of the dwelling | Ordinal category | 1 = Good; 2 = Fair; 3 = Poor | |
| Socioeconomic | V1_SOC | Permanent household occupancy count | Continuous (discrete-scale) | 1–11 persons (count) |
| V2_SOC | Presence of vulnerable household members | Ordinal category | 0 = None; 1 = Children (<12); 2 = Elderly (>65); 3 = Both | |
| V3_SOC | Length of household residence | Ordinal category | 1 = <1 yr; 2 = 1–5; 3 = 6–10; 4 = 11–20; 5 = 21–30; 6 = 31–40; 7 = >40 | |
| V4_SOC | Housing tenure status | Ordinal category | 1 = Rented; 2 = Borrowed/family-owned; 3 = Owned with title | |
| Geotechnical | V1_GEO | Household-reported diapiric events (uplift, extrusion, and subsidence) | Binary nominal | 0 = No events; 1 = Events reported |
| V2_GEO | Temporal frequency of reported events | Ordinal categorical | 0 = Never; 1 = >5 yrs ago; 2 = Within 5 yrs; 3 = Multiple within 5 yrs | |
| V3_GEO | Evidence of rising damp in walls/floors | Binary nominal | 0 = No; 1 = Yes | |
| V4_GEO | Visible ground surface deformation (cracks, tilting, and settlement) | Binary nominal | 0 = No; 1 = Yes |
| Determination | Container 1 | Min. Vol. (mL) | Sample Type 2 | Preservation 3 | Recommended Holding Time | Regulation |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloride | P | 50 | S | No preservation required | 28 d | 28 d |
| Conductivity | P | 500 | S | Refrigerate < 6 °C | 28 d | 28 d |
| Fluoride | P | 100 | S | No preservation required | 28 d | 28 d |
| Metals | P | 1000 | S | Add HNO3 to pH < 2.0 | 6 months | 6 months |
| pH | P | 50 | S | Analyze immediately | 0.25 h | 0.25 h |
| Solids | P | 200 | S | Refrigerate < 6 °C | 7 d | 2–7 d |
| Temperature | P | 50 | S | Analyze immediately | 0.25 h | 0.25 h |
| Parameter/Component | Analytical Method | Reference Standard | Instrument/Conditions | Limit of Quantification (LOQ) | QA/QC Performance 1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Metals (Ca, Fe, Mg, K, and Na) | ICP–MS | APHA 3030 K [39]; EPA 200.8 Rev.5 [40] | Acid digestion with ultrapure HNO3 and multi-element calibration (R2 ≥ 0.999) | 0.09–0.15 mg·L−1 | Recoveries 97–102% and deviation < 5% |
| Major Anions (Cl−, F−, and SO42−) | Ion Chromatography (IC) | EPA 300.0 Rev.2.1 [41] | Total of 0.45 µm filtration and suppressed conductivity detection | F−: 0.05 mg·L−1; Cl−, SO42−: 0.20 mg·L−1 | Calibration R2 ≥ 0.999, and duplicates and blanks verified |
| Total Solids (TSs) | Gravimetric | APHA 2540 B [42] | Evaporation at 103–105 °C to constant weight | — | Recovery 99% and precision confirmed |
| Volatile Solids (VTSs) | Gravimetric (loss on ignition) | APHA 2540 B/E [42,43] | Ignition at 550 °C for 1 h | — | Expressed as mg VTS L−1 and reproducibility verified |
| Total Suspended Solids (TSSs) | Gravimetric | APHA 2540 D [44] | Filtration through pre-weighed glass fiber filters and drying at 103–105 °C | — | Precision confirmed via duplicates |
| Physical Parameters (T°, pH, and EC) | In situ electrometric measurement | APHA 2550 B, 4500-H+ B, 2510 B [45,46,47] | Temperature, pH, and conductivity, standardized to 25 °C | — | ±0.01 precision and field–lab consistency verified |
| Parameter * | Value |
|---|---|
| Confidence Level | 90% |
| α | 10% |
| α/2 | 0.5 |
| Z | 1.64 |
| 2.71 | |
| p(1 − p) | 0.21 |
| 0.01 |
| Point (Code) | Zone | Number of Households | % of Total Population | Theoretical Sample Size | Adjusted Sample (Effective n) | Stratification Adjustment * (Final n) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| P1 | Affected Zone | 557 | 49% | 161 | 90 | 118 |
| P2 | Non-Affected Zone | 406 | 35% | 145 | 65 | 84 |
| P3 | Independent Zone | 183 | 16% | 101 | 29 | 38 |
| Total | — | 1146 | 100% | 407 | 184 | 240 |
| Dimension/Variable | Category | n | * % | Cumulative % | Key Statistics/Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STRUCTURAL | |||||
| V1: Crack presence | No | 127 | 53.1 | 53.1 | Mode = No; risk ratio 0.88:1 (approx. parity) |
| Yes | 112 | 46.9 | 100.0 | ||
| V2: Crack orientation (n = 112 cracked dwellings) | Horizontal | 26 | 10.9 | 23.2 | Median = Vertical; Mode = Diagonal (indicative of differential settlement) |
| Vertical | 38 | 15.9 | 57.1 | Mean = 2.20 ± 0.79 | |
| Diagonal | 48 | 20.1 | 100.0 | ||
| V3: Crack severity (n = 112 cracked dwellings) | 0.4–0.8 mm (hairline) | 19 | 7.9 | 17.0 | Median and Mode = >1.5 mm (severe); Mean = 2.41 ± 0.82 |
| 0.9–1.5 mm (moderate) | 28 | 11.7 | 42.0 | ||
| >1.5 mm (severe) | 65 | 27.2 | 100.0 | ||
| V4: Overall dwelling condition | Good | 95 | 39.7 | 39.7 | Median = Fair; 60.3% require intervention (Fair + Poor) |
| Fair | 112 | 46.9 | 86.6 | ||
| Poor | 32 | 13.4 | 100.0 | ||
| SOCIOECONOMIC | |||||
| V1: Household size (persons) | — | — | — | — | Mean = 4.23 ± 2.08; Range = 1–11; CV = 49.2% (moderate dispersion) |
| V2: Vulnerable population members | None | 67 | 28.0 | 28.0 | Median = Children only; 72.0% with ≥1 vulnerable member |
| Children only | 91 | 38.1 | 66.1 | Mode = Children only | |
| Elderly only | 9 | 3.8 | 69.9 | ||
| Children + elderly | 72 | 30.1 | 100.0 | Mean = 1.36 ± 1.15 | |
| V3: Years of residence | <1 year | 12 | 5.0 | 5.0 | Median = 11–20 years; 69% >10 years (high rootedness) |
| 1–5 years | 38 | 15.9 | 20.9 | ||
| 6–10 years | 47 | 19.7 | 40.6 | ||
| 11–20 years | 68 | 28.5 | 69.0 | ||
| 21–30 years | 41 | 17.2 | 86.2 | 31% >20 years (very high attachment) | |
| 31–40 years | 22 | 9.2 | 95.4 | ||
| >40 years | 11 | 4.6 | 100.0 | ||
| V4: Housing tenure | Rented | 40 | 16.7 | 16.7 | Median and mode = Owned; owner/non-owner ratio 4.43:1 |
| Borrowed/family | 4 | 1.7 | 18.4 | ||
| -owned with title | 195 | 81.6 | 100.0 | Mean = 2.65 ± 0.73 | |
| GEOTECHNICAL | |||||
| V1: Diapiric events reported | No | 150 | 62.8 | 62.8 | Mode = No; affected/unaffected ratio 1:1.69 |
| Yes | 89 | 37.2 | 100.0 | ||
| V2: Event temporal frequency (n = 89 affected) | Single event > 5 yrs | 27 | 11.3 | 30.3 | Median and mode = single event ≤5 yrs; 27% recurrent activity |
| Single event ≤ 5 yrs | 38 | 15.9 | 73.0 | Mean = 1.97 ± 0.79 | |
| Multiple events ≤ 5 yrs | 24 | 10.0 | 100.0 | ||
| V3: Rising damp evidence | No | 161 | 67.4 | 67.4 | Mode = No; ratio of damp/dry = 1:2.06 |
| Yes | 78 | 32.6 | 100.0 | ||
| V4: Ground surface deformation | No | 183 | 76.6 | 76.6 | Mode = No; ratio of deform/stable = 1:3.27 |
| Yes | 56 | 23.4 | 100.0 |
| Dimension | n Items | Cronbach’s α | 95% CI | α (Standardized) | Mean Inter-Item Correlation | Item–Total Correlations | α If Item Deleted |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Structural | 4 | 0.685 | [0.622, 0.744] | 0.692 | 0.41 | V1: 0.58 V2: 0.61 V3: 0.59 V4: 0.28 | V1: 0.587 V2: 0.564 V3: 0.578 V4: 0.784 |
| Socioeconomic | 4 | 0.289 | [0.178, 0.401] | 0.301 | 0.09 | V1: 0.21 V2: 0.19 V3: 0.15 V4: 0.24 | V1: 0.219 V2: 0.234 V3: 0.287 V4: 0.198 |
| Geotechnical | 4 | 0.756 | [0.709, 0.798] | 0.761 | 0.48 | V1: 0.67 V2: 0.69 V3: 0.58 V4: 0.62 | V1: 0.651 V2: 0.637 V3: 0.717 V4: 0.689 |
| Test | Value | Criterion |
|---|---|---|
| KMO | 0.724 | ≥0.60 |
| Bartlett’s χ2 | 892.4 | p < 0.05 |
| Bartlett’s df | 55 | — |
| Bartlett’s p | <0.001 | — |
| n/variables ratio | 21.7:1 | ≥5:1 |
| Parameter | Unit | Method | Result |
|---|---|---|---|
| Time | hours | — | 12:30 |
| Temperature | °C | Electrometric | 30.4 |
| pH | units | Electrometric | 8.01 |
| Conductivity | mS/cm | Electrometric | 20.4 |
| Total Suspended Solids (TSSs) | mg/L | Gravimetric | 20 |
| Total Dissolved Solids (TDSs) | mg/L | Gravimetric | 13,220 |
| Total Volatile Solids (TVSs) | mg/L | Gravimetric | 40 |
| Total Solids (TSs) | mg/L | Gravimetric | 13,240 |
| Fluoride (F−) | mg/L | Ion chromatography | <0.05 |
| Chloride (Cl−) | mg/L | Ion chromatography | 6996.49 |
| Sulfate (SO42−) | mg/L | Ion chromatography | 1.67 |
| Calcium (Ca2+) | mg/L | ICP-MS | 52.2 |
| Magnesium (Mg2+) | mg/L | ICP-MS | 23.1 |
| Iron (Fe, dissolved) | mg/L | ICP-MS | 6.84 |
| Potassium (K+) | mg/L | ICP-MS | 39.1 |
| Sodium (Na+) * | mg/L | ICP-MS | 8.0 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2026 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
Share and Cite
de Diego, G.E.F.; Quiñones-Bolaño, E.; Arrieta-Marin, G.; Nuñez de la Rosa, Y.E.; Baldovino, J.A. Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Mud Diapirism Dynamics in Membrillal, Cartagena de Indias: Implications for Rural Communities and Susceptibility Assessment. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 2194. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052194
de Diego GEF, Quiñones-Bolaño E, Arrieta-Marin G, Nuñez de la Rosa YE, Baldovino JA. Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Mud Diapirism Dynamics in Membrillal, Cartagena de Indias: Implications for Rural Communities and Susceptibility Assessment. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(5):2194. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052194
Chicago/Turabian Stylede Diego, Gustavo Eliecer Florez, Edgar Quiñones-Bolaño, Gertrudis Arrieta-Marin, Yamid E. Nuñez de la Rosa, and Jair Arrieta Baldovino. 2026. "Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Mud Diapirism Dynamics in Membrillal, Cartagena de Indias: Implications for Rural Communities and Susceptibility Assessment" Applied Sciences 16, no. 5: 2194. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052194
APA Stylede Diego, G. E. F., Quiñones-Bolaño, E., Arrieta-Marin, G., Nuñez de la Rosa, Y. E., & Baldovino, J. A. (2026). Spatio-Temporal Analysis of Mud Diapirism Dynamics in Membrillal, Cartagena de Indias: Implications for Rural Communities and Susceptibility Assessment. Applied Sciences, 16(5), 2194. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16052194

