Next Article in Journal
Excavation Stability of Tunnel Structure in Water-Rich Areas
Previous Article in Journal
DAH-YOLO: An Accurate and Efficient Model for Crack Detection in Complex Scenarios
Previous Article in Special Issue
Working from Home and Indoor Environmental Quality: A Scoping Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Fostering Amenity Criteria for the Implementation of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems in Public Spaces: A Novel Decision Methodological Framework

by
Claudia Rocio Suarez Castillo
1,2,
Luis A. Sañudo-Fontaneda
2,3,*,
Jorge Roces-García
2,3 and
Juan P. Rodríguez
4
1
Environmental and Natural Science Research Group (GICAN), Environmental Engineering Faculty, Universidad Santo Tomás, Tunja 150003, Colombia
2
Civil, Environmental and Geomatics Engineering Research Group (CEGE), Polytechnic School of Mieres, University of Oviedo, Calle Gonzalo Gutiérrez Quirós s/n, 33600 Mieres, Spain
3
Department of Construction and Manufacturing Engineering, Polytechnic School of Engineering, University of Oviedo, Calle Pedro Puig Adam, 33203 Gijón, Spain
4
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, University of the Andes, Mario Laserna Building, Bogotá 111711, Colombia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(2), 901; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020901
Submission received: 26 November 2025 / Revised: 22 December 2025 / Accepted: 12 January 2026 / Published: 15 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Resilient Cities in the Context of Climate Change)

Abstract

Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems (SUDSs) are essential for stormwater management in urban areas, with varying hydrological, social, ecological, and economic benefits. Nevertheless, choosing the SUDS most appropriate for public spaces poses a challenge when balancing details/specifications against community decisions, primarily social implications and perceptions. Building on the SUDS design pillar of the amenity, this study outlines a three-phase methodological framework for selecting SUDS based on social facilitation. The first phase introduces the application of the Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) and Classificatory Expectation–Maximization (CEM) techniques by modeling complex social interdependencies to find critical components related to urban planning. A Likert scale survey was also conducted with 440 urban dwellers in Tunja (Colombia), which identified three dimensions: Residential Satisfaction (RS), Resilience and Adaptation to Climate Change (RACC), and Community Participation (CP). In the second phase, the factors identified above were transformed into eight operational criteria, which were weighted using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) with the collaboration of 35 international experts in SUDS planning and implementation. In the third phase, these weighted criteria were used to evaluate and classify 13 types of SUDSs based on the experts’ assessments of their sub-criteria. The results deliver a clear message: cities must concentrate on solutions that will guarantee that water is managed to the best of their ability, not just safely, and that also enhance climate resilience, energy efficiency, and the ways in which public space is used. Among those options considered, infiltration ponds, green roofs, rain gardens, wetlands, and the like were the best-performing options, providing real and concrete uses in promoting a more resilient and sustainable urban water system. The methodology was also used in a real case in Tunja, Colombia. In its results, this approach proved not only pragmatic but also useful for all concerned, showing that the socio-cultural dimensions can be truly integrated into planning SUDSs and ensuring success.
Keywords: social co-benefits; blue–green infrastructure; community resilience; stormwater management; water sensitive urban planning social co-benefits; blue–green infrastructure; community resilience; stormwater management; water sensitive urban planning

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suarez Castillo, C.R.; Sañudo-Fontaneda, L.A.; Roces-García, J.; Rodríguez, J.P. Fostering Amenity Criteria for the Implementation of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems in Public Spaces: A Novel Decision Methodological Framework. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 901. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020901

AMA Style

Suarez Castillo CR, Sañudo-Fontaneda LA, Roces-García J, Rodríguez JP. Fostering Amenity Criteria for the Implementation of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems in Public Spaces: A Novel Decision Methodological Framework. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(2):901. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020901

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suarez Castillo, Claudia Rocio, Luis A. Sañudo-Fontaneda, Jorge Roces-García, and Juan P. Rodríguez. 2026. "Fostering Amenity Criteria for the Implementation of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems in Public Spaces: A Novel Decision Methodological Framework" Applied Sciences 16, no. 2: 901. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020901

APA Style

Suarez Castillo, C. R., Sañudo-Fontaneda, L. A., Roces-García, J., & Rodríguez, J. P. (2026). Fostering Amenity Criteria for the Implementation of Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems in Public Spaces: A Novel Decision Methodological Framework. Applied Sciences, 16(2), 901. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16020901

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop