Next Article in Journal
Human-Centered AI Healthcare Interventions and Quality of Life in Older Adults Living Alone: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Data-Driven Bridge Scour Monitoring: A Taxonomy and Drive-By Machine Learning Case Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Minimum-Phase Preserving Balanced Truncation with Data-Driven Order Scoring

1
Faculty of Electronics and Electrical Engineering, Hung Yen University of Technology and Education, Hung Yen 17000, Vietnam
2
Faculty of Electronics, Thai Nguyen University of Technology, Thai Nguyen 251750, Vietnam
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(16), 7897; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16167897
Submission received: 30 June 2026 / Revised: 27 July 2026 / Accepted: 1 August 2026 / Published: 7 August 2026

Abstract

This paper investigates the problem of model-order reduction for linear systems arising from minimum-phase circuits and filters, where stability and frequency characteristics must be preserved. The MPPBT framework uses a Riccati–Lyapunov Gramian pair and constructs a balancing transformation with the sequence of MPPBT singular values, from which a relative error bound in the H norm and a scoring function, Sβ, are derived to select the model order. We apply the algorithm to a fourth-order Butterworth low-pass filter with a full-order state dimension, n=4, and reduced-order models with r=1, 2, 3 are examined. The results show that the model with r=3 yields an H error of approximately 6.3×103 and an H2 error of approximately 2.2×103. The model with r=1 gives an H error of approximately 1.46 and an H2 error of approximately 4.8×101. The model with r=2 attains a composite score of Sβ0.16, preserves stability and the minimum-phase property, and is regarded as a balanced choice between accuracy and complexity. A further comparison on an RLC ladder circuit of order n=15 shows that at r=3, MPPBT achieves the lowest H error among BT, PRBT, and MPPBT, while retaining an H2 error close to that of BT.
Keywords: balanced truncation; Butterworth filter; minimum phase; model-order reduction; multi-criteria scoring balanced truncation; Butterworth filter; minimum phase; model-order reduction; multi-criteria scoring

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pham, T.N.; Nguyen, H.T.P.; Vu, H.-S.; Do, K.T.; Dao, H.-D. Minimum-Phase Preserving Balanced Truncation with Data-Driven Order Scoring. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 7897. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16167897

AMA Style

Pham TN, Nguyen HTP, Vu H-S, Do KT, Dao H-D. Minimum-Phase Preserving Balanced Truncation with Data-Driven Order Scoring. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(16):7897. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16167897

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pham, Thang Ngoc, Hoa Thi Phuong Nguyen, Hong-Son Vu, Khanh Tuan Do, and Huy-Du Dao. 2026. "Minimum-Phase Preserving Balanced Truncation with Data-Driven Order Scoring" Applied Sciences 16, no. 16: 7897. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16167897

APA Style

Pham, T. N., Nguyen, H. T. P., Vu, H.-S., Do, K. T., & Dao, H.-D. (2026). Minimum-Phase Preserving Balanced Truncation with Data-Driven Order Scoring. Applied Sciences, 16(16), 7897. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16167897

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop