Next Article in Journal
Fully Digital Guided Single-Stage Maxillectomy and Zygomatic Implant Rehabilitation After Recurrent Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report
Previous Article in Journal
A Secure Multimodal Biometric Data Protection Framework Using Optimized CNN, GAN-Based Privacy Preservation, and ElGamal Cryptography
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Simulation and Comparative Analysis of Advanced Scenarios for High- and Low-Temperature Superconducting Tokamaks Using METIS Code

1
Institute of Plasma Physics, Hefei Institutes of Physical Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hefei 230031, China
2
Science Island Branch, Graduate School of USTC, Hefei 230026, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(13), 6529; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16136529
Submission received: 28 May 2026 / Revised: 21 June 2026 / Accepted: 26 June 2026 / Published: 30 June 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Plasma Physics, Diagnostics, and Technology)

Abstract

The development of steady-state advanced operation modes with high fusion gain (Q) is a primary objective of magnetic confinement fusion research. The advancement of high-temperature superconducting (HTS) magnet technology has introduced a new development path using devices like SPARC. This path contrasts with the conventional low-temperature superconducting (LTS) approach represented by devices such as BEST. This study utilizes the fast integrated modeling code METIS to compare the physical conditions required for HTS-based (SPARC-like) and LTS-based (BEST-like) devices to achieve an energy gain of Q ≈ 5. Furthermore, we simulated the achievable fusion power for both devices under an identical set of core physics parameters to isolate the effect of magnetic field strength. Simulation results show that at a similar Q ≈ 5, the HTS device leverages its high magnetic field to require significantly lower auxiliary heating power (approximately 50–60% less). Additionally, it operates at a lower Greenwald density fraction (fGW ≈ 0.37) than the LTS device (fGW ≈ 0.87). This well validates the strong dependence of the fusion triple product on magnetic field strength (∝B3). Under identical high-density (“BEST-like”) parameters, the HTS device achieves much higher fusion power but faces a drastically increased L-H transition power threshold. This increase may force operation in L-mode. Crucially, even in L-mode, there remains the possibility for high-field HTS devices to achieve Q > 5 via high-density operation.
Keywords: tokamak; scenario design; METIS; fusion gain; high-temperature superconductor tokamak; scenario design; METIS; fusion gain; high-temperature superconductor

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, F.; Wu, J.; Xu, G.; Li, M.; Tao, Y. Simulation and Comparative Analysis of Advanced Scenarios for High- and Low-Temperature Superconducting Tokamaks Using METIS Code. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 6529. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16136529

AMA Style

Wang F, Wu J, Xu G, Li M, Tao Y. Simulation and Comparative Analysis of Advanced Scenarios for High- and Low-Temperature Superconducting Tokamaks Using METIS Code. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(13):6529. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16136529

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Fujia, Jiarong Wu, Guosheng Xu, Miaohui Li, and Ye Tao. 2026. "Simulation and Comparative Analysis of Advanced Scenarios for High- and Low-Temperature Superconducting Tokamaks Using METIS Code" Applied Sciences 16, no. 13: 6529. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16136529

APA Style

Wang, F., Wu, J., Xu, G., Li, M., & Tao, Y. (2026). Simulation and Comparative Analysis of Advanced Scenarios for High- and Low-Temperature Superconducting Tokamaks Using METIS Code. Applied Sciences, 16(13), 6529. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16136529

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop