Next Article in Journal
CS-DeepLabV3+: A Fine-Grained Semantic Segmentation Method for Mining Land Use in the Kunlun Mountain Region Using High-Resolution Remote Sensing Imagery
Previous Article in Journal
CFD Analysis of Airflow and Heat Transfer Around a Six-Car Train in a Confined Tunnel at Multiple Operational Stages
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Efficient Adverse-Weather Restoration for Unified-Memory Edge GPUs via Memory-Traffic-Aware Fusion

by
Shang-En Tsai
*,
Pei-Ching Yang
and
Wei-Cheng Sun
Department of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan City 711, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(10), 4818; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16104818 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 16 April 2026 / Revised: 2 May 2026 / Accepted: 5 May 2026 / Published: 12 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Computing and Artificial Intelligence)

Abstract

Adverse-weather image restoration is increasingly needed in edge vision systems, yet many recent methods are developed primarily for accuracy on server-class hardware rather than efficient deployment on resource-constrained platforms. This gap is particularly important for unified-memory edge GPUs, where memory traffic, activation movement, and latency variability can become major bottlenecks during inference. To address this issue, this paper presents an efficient adverse-weather restoration framework for unified-memory edge GPUs based on a memory-traffic-aware fusion strategy. Instead of relying on heavy multi-branch interaction or traffic-intensive feature aggregation, the proposed design emphasizes compact feature exchange, activation-aware computation, and hardware-friendly luminance modulation under constrained memory bandwidth. The framework is developed to preserve restoration quality while reducing unnecessary intermediate data movement, thereby improving runtime efficiency and practical deployability on edge devices. Experiments on ACDC show that the proposed MW-DSNet improves downstream semantic segmentation robustness to 49.8% mIoU under a fixed segmentation head, outperforming the no-restoration input by +6.9 points and TransWeather by +0.8 points. On the NVIDIA Jetson Orin Nano (NVIDIA Corporation, Santa Clara, CA, USA) under the 15 W mode, the FP16 TensorRT engine sustains 30.0 FPS at 720p with 35.1 ms p95 latency, 36.8 ms p99 latency, and 650 MB/frame DRAM traffic. INT8 deployment with night heavy calibration further improves throughput to 42.5 FPS and reduces DRAM traffic to 380 MB/frame while limiting the mIoU drop to 1.7 points. These measured results indicate that memory-traffic-aware fusion and luminance-conditioned modulation provide a practical accuracy–efficiency trade-off for unified-memory edge GPUs.
Keywords: memory-traffic-aware fusion; DRAM traffic; roofline analysis; unified-memory edge GPUs; real-time deployment memory-traffic-aware fusion; DRAM traffic; roofline analysis; unified-memory edge GPUs; real-time deployment

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsai, S.-E.; Yang, P.-C.; Sun, W.-C. Efficient Adverse-Weather Restoration for Unified-Memory Edge GPUs via Memory-Traffic-Aware Fusion. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 4818. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16104818

AMA Style

Tsai S-E, Yang P-C, Sun W-C. Efficient Adverse-Weather Restoration for Unified-Memory Edge GPUs via Memory-Traffic-Aware Fusion. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(10):4818. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16104818

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsai, Shang-En, Pei-Ching Yang, and Wei-Cheng Sun. 2026. "Efficient Adverse-Weather Restoration for Unified-Memory Edge GPUs via Memory-Traffic-Aware Fusion" Applied Sciences 16, no. 10: 4818. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16104818

APA Style

Tsai, S.-E., Yang, P.-C., & Sun, W.-C. (2026). Efficient Adverse-Weather Restoration for Unified-Memory Edge GPUs via Memory-Traffic-Aware Fusion. Applied Sciences, 16(10), 4818. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16104818

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop