Next Article in Journal
Multi-Vector Adversarial Testing of an AI-Orchestrated Zero Trust Methodology on Constrained Edge Hardware
Previous Article in Journal
Agronomic Valorization of Sewage Sludge Through Composting and Liming
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

A Public-Data-Based Multimodal Framework for Plant Growth State Analysis Toward Future Filter-Free Aquaponic Validation

Department of Software, College of Engineering, Catholic Kwandong University, Gangneung 25601, Republic of Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(10), 4810; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16104810 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 30 March 2026 / Revised: 7 May 2026 / Accepted: 8 May 2026 / Published: 12 May 2026

Abstract

This study proposes the Hydroponic Plant Growth Analysis System (HPGAS), a public-data-based preliminary framework for multimodal plant growth state analysis toward future filter-free aquaponic validation. The HPGAS integrates plant images, water quality signals, and environmental signals to estimate an image-centered growth index, growth stage, and proxy abnormal state probability. Because no public dataset jointly provides plant images, direct growth labels, fish metabolic variables, suspended solids, and nitrification-related measurements from a real filter-free aquaponic system, this study is not a direct operational validation. A two-stage evaluation was conducted using the Autonomous Greenhouse Challenge (AGC), HydroGrowNet, and two aquaponic Internet of Things (IoT) water quality datasets. Stage 1 implemented dataset loaders, image–sensor alignment, proxy label generation, and unimodal and fusion baselines. Stage 2 expanded handcrafted image and sensor-context features and adopted month-wise hold-out evaluation. The image-only model achieved the best growth index regression performance, with a root mean square error (RMSE) of 0.0492 ± 0.0187, whereas the fusion model showed a RMSE of 0.0837 ± 0.0196. Conversely, the fusion model achieved the best proxy abnormal state classification performance, with a F1 score of 0.9695 ± 0.0057 under the clean condition, decreasing to 0.9232 ± 0.0263 under sensor dropout and 0.9132 ± 0.0169 under image noise. Under sensor dropout, the fusion model was more stable than the sensor-only model, whereas under image noise it degraded more than the image-only model. These results indicate that multimodal fusion is most useful for proxy abnormal state classification and robust state interpretation, rather than universally superior scalar growth regression. The HPGAS provides a reproducible baseline for future real filter-free aquaponic experiments, while its operational validity remains to be tested using real filter-free aquaponic data.
Keywords: aquaponics; hydroponics; plant growth analysis; multimodal learning; proxy abnormal state classification; RGB-D phenotyping; sensor fusion aquaponics; hydroponics; plant growth analysis; multimodal learning; proxy abnormal state classification; RGB-D phenotyping; sensor fusion

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jeong, Y.; Son, S. A Public-Data-Based Multimodal Framework for Plant Growth State Analysis Toward Future Filter-Free Aquaponic Validation. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 4810. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16104810

AMA Style

Jeong Y, Son S. A Public-Data-Based Multimodal Framework for Plant Growth State Analysis Toward Future Filter-Free Aquaponic Validation. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(10):4810. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16104810

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jeong, Yina, and Surak Son. 2026. "A Public-Data-Based Multimodal Framework for Plant Growth State Analysis Toward Future Filter-Free Aquaponic Validation" Applied Sciences 16, no. 10: 4810. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16104810

APA Style

Jeong, Y., & Son, S. (2026). A Public-Data-Based Multimodal Framework for Plant Growth State Analysis Toward Future Filter-Free Aquaponic Validation. Applied Sciences, 16(10), 4810. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16104810

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop