Next Article in Journal
An Improved Damage–Plasticity Constitutive Model Capturing Rock Softening Behavior Under Various Confining Pressures
Previous Article in Journal
Digital Surgical Guides in Bone Regeneration: Literature Review and Clinical Case Report
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Comparative Analysis of Clustering Algorithms for Unsupervised Segmentation of Dental Radiographs

by
Priscilla T. Awosina
*,
Peter O. Olukanmi
* and
Pitshou N. Bokoro
Department of Electrical Engineering Technology, Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg 2092, South Africa
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2026, 16(1), 540; https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010540
Submission received: 7 June 2025 / Revised: 12 July 2025 / Accepted: 13 July 2025 / Published: 5 January 2026

Abstract

In medical diagnostics and decision-making, particularly in dentistry where structural interpretation of radiographs plays a crucial role, accurate image segmentation is a fundamental step. One established approach to segmentation is the use of clustering techniques. This study evaluates the performance of five clustering algorithms, namely, K-Means, Fuzzy C-Means, DBSCAN, Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM), and Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering for image segmentation. Our study uses two sets of real-world dental data comprising 140 adult tooth images and 70 children’s tooth images, including professionally annotated ground truth masks. Preprocessing involved grayscale conversion, normalization, and image downscaling to accommodate computational constraints for complex algorithms. The algorithms were accessed using a variety of metrics including Rand Index, Fowlkes-Mallows Index, Recall, Precision, F1-Score, and Jaccard Index. DBSCAN achieved the highest performance on adult data in terms of structural fidelity and cluster compactness, while Fuzzy C-Means excelled on the children dataset, capturing soft tissue boundaries more effectively. The results highlight distinct performance behaviours tied to morphological differences between adult and pediatric dental anatomy. This study offers practical insights for selecting clustering algorithms tailored to dental imaging challenges, advancing efforts in automated, label-free medical image analysis.
Keywords: image segmentation; clustering algorithms; dental image analysis; unsupervised learning; DBSCAN; Fuzzy C-Means; Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM); evaluation metrics; medical imaging; tooth segmentation image segmentation; clustering algorithms; dental image analysis; unsupervised learning; DBSCAN; Fuzzy C-Means; Gaussian Mixture Models (GMM); evaluation metrics; medical imaging; tooth segmentation

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Awosina, P.T.; Olukanmi, P.O.; Bokoro, P.N. Comparative Analysis of Clustering Algorithms for Unsupervised Segmentation of Dental Radiographs. Appl. Sci. 2026, 16, 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010540

AMA Style

Awosina PT, Olukanmi PO, Bokoro PN. Comparative Analysis of Clustering Algorithms for Unsupervised Segmentation of Dental Radiographs. Applied Sciences. 2026; 16(1):540. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010540

Chicago/Turabian Style

Awosina, Priscilla T., Peter O. Olukanmi, and Pitshou N. Bokoro. 2026. "Comparative Analysis of Clustering Algorithms for Unsupervised Segmentation of Dental Radiographs" Applied Sciences 16, no. 1: 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010540

APA Style

Awosina, P. T., Olukanmi, P. O., & Bokoro, P. N. (2026). Comparative Analysis of Clustering Algorithms for Unsupervised Segmentation of Dental Radiographs. Applied Sciences, 16(1), 540. https://doi.org/10.3390/app16010540

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop