Next Article in Journal
A Neural Network Constitutive Model and Automatic Stiffness Evaluation for Multiscale Finite Elements
Previous Article in Journal
Simulation of Building Energy Consumption for Different Design Features of Window Elements: Case Study in a Hot Climate Region
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

From Self-Cleaning to Self-Aware Solar Mirror Skin

by
Anna Castaldo
*,
Emilia Gambale
and
Giuseppe Vitiello
Department of Energy Technologies and Renewable Sources (TERIN), Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), 80055 Portici, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(7), 3696; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15073696
Submission received: 27 January 2025 / Revised: 13 March 2025 / Accepted: 26 March 2025 / Published: 27 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Thermal Engineering)

Abstract

:

Featured Application

Distributed sensing of solar mirror soiling and/or failure by means of self-cleaning and sensitive coatings.

Abstract

Self-cleaning coatings for solar mirrors aim to reduce water usage for cleaning, cut down on maintenance costs for solar fields, and lower the overall electricity production costs in concentrated solar power (CSP) systems. Various approaches have been developed for mirrors with back surface (BSM) and front surface (FSM) architectures, all sharing the characteristic that the self-cleaning coating serves as the outermost layer, acting as a “skin” that protects against fouling. A recent trend in this field is to enhance this “skin” with sensing capabilities, allowing it to self-monitor its performance in terms of soiling or failure, contributing to the digitalization of solar fields and CSP technology. Building on previous work with auxetic aluminum nitrides and ZnO transparent composites, which were developed to replace alumina as the self-cleaning layer in BSMs, this study explores the potential of adding sensing properties to these coatings. The approach leverages the piezoelectric properties of the materials, which can be linked to dust accumulation and surface soiling, as well as their electrical resistive behavior, which can help monitor potential failures. The promising d33 values of sputtered piezoelectric AlN and the tailored electrical properties of ZnO composites, combined with their self-cleaning effects and optical clarity across the full solar spectrum, suggest that these coatings could serve as an intelligent, self-aware skin for solar mirrors.

1. Introduction

Significant efforts are being made to reduce the operating expenses (OPEX) of concentrated solar power (CSP) systems [1]. One key challenge is the performance of solar reflectors/mirrors, which is compromised by soiling [2,3]. Restoring the specular reflectivity of these mirrors requires large amounts of water [4], and the cost of cleaning procedures directly impacts the levelized cost of energy (LCOE) produced by CSP plants [5].
Among the various strategies to address this issue, the most effective involves the development of solar mirrors coated with thin, transparent, self-cleaning films. These coatings allow for significantly reduced water consumption during cleaning, leading to considerable cost savings, particularly in regions with high labor or resource costs, such as desert areas [6].
Additionally, self-cleaning coatings play a crucial role in maintaining the cleanliness of all types of solar mirrors while resisting environmental degradation over time, without compromising optical transparency or reflectivity [7]. Consequently, an emerging trend for ensuring the long-term performance of solar mirrors is the integration of autonomous and intelligent operational quality control systems, like those already being implemented in the photovoltaic sector [8,9,10].
Providing a solar field with intelligence and automating O&M (Operations and Maintenance) processes requires the ability to monitor the dirt level or detect failures in individual mirrors (or even the entire field), enabling on-demand cleaning or component replacement [11]. Practically, this could be achieved by adding commercial sensors to the mirrors. However, this approach would be costly and inefficient, as there are no commercial sensors currently suitable for use on solar mirrors. It is important to remember that solar mirrors have strict optical requirements, are exposed to outdoor conditions, and, even in medium-sized solar plants, are found in large quantities [12]. To date, no commercial sensor-equipped mirrors exist, only patented prototypes that incorporate scattering sensors into the mirror design [13]. If a layer of the existing solar mirrors—such as the exposed layer—were made sensitive to soiling (or other specific parameters), it would allow for the monitoring of their performance. This has motivated us to explore the integration of sensing thin films directly into the mirror structure.
In our previous work [14], we demonstrated that the wetting properties of solar mirrors can be modified by applying transparent auxetic metamaterials to reflector surfaces using scalable processes, with the goal of reducing water consumption in cleaning procedures. Auxetic aluminum nitrides, deposited via sputtering on metallized low-iron glass, have been proposed as an ideal self-cleaning solution for back-surface mirrors. These coatings are transparent, hydrophobic, versatile, and can be applied to large substrates using cost-effective and scalable techniques.
But can these coatings be further engineered to meet additional functional requirements? This study seeks to answer that question. Our objective is to develop self-cleaning metamaterials that can also function as sensors to detect mirror performance failures caused by dust accumulation, excessive humidity, or other critical factors such as structural damage, aging, corrosion, and erosion. Through a dedicated electronic interface and IoT integration, these materials could provide real-time data on soiling levels and the overall functionality of individual components or the entire solar field.
Regarding aluminum nitrides, it is well known that thin films exhibit piezoelectric behavior when they crystallize in the hexagonal phase and grow perpendicularly to the substrate along the c-axis [15].
Piezoelectric phases develop an electric dipole when the mechanical strain is applied to them. All dipoles add up over the entire material and produce a net polarization that results in electric field generation, which can be piezoelectrically transduced to electric voltage and current and hence detected.
In other terms, if we coat a solar mirror with a piezoelectric material, we can turn it into a dust sensor. In desert environments, where dust conditions are extreme, the amount of dust that accumulates on a solar mirror can be significant. In regions like the Sahara or the Middle East, dust deposition rates range from 10 to 100 g/m2 per day, with an average of about 1.5 kg/m2 over the course of a month [16]. This dust accumulation exerts pressure on the surface of the mirror, which can be detected by the piezoelectric material as an electrical signal.
The main challenge in this context is that dust does not accumulate uniformly. On a relatively small area, such as 1 cm2, the piezoelectric signal generated by dust pressure would be very small, on the order of picovolts (pV), which is too low to be easily detectable by standard sensors. However, by increasing the sensitive area to 1 m2, the generated signal could increase significantly, reaching microvolts (µV), which is much more detectable than the signal from a smaller area. The importance of distributing sensing in this case is crucial. A larger sensitive area not only amplifies the piezoelectric signal enough to surpass the noise threshold (typically in the nanovolt range) but also allows for more precise monitoring of the entire surface of the mirror, averaging out localized pressure variations caused by dust. A larger surface area better distributes pressure fluctuations, improving the stability and reliability of the detection system.
In summary, by using a larger sensitive area and optimizing the piezoelectric material properties, measurable signals can be obtained even under harsh desert conditions, where dust accumulates rapidly and unevenly. This dual strategy of enhancing piezoelectric material properties and defining an effective device architecture is crucial for achieving robust, measurable signals in distributed dust sensing.
In this work, we focus on maximizing the piezoelectric effect of the material in the form of a thin film. The goal is to optimize the piezoelectric properties to generate a strong and measurable signal in response to dust accumulation. This study aims to enhance the material’s performance by fine-tuning its composition and structure to achieve the highest possible sensitivity. In a future study, we will investigate the optimal device area to further improve the sensor’s efficiency and performance, ensuring that the sensitive skin can reliably detect dust accumulation across the entire surface of the solar mirror.
In particular, the first step of fabrication of thin AlN films by means of reactive sputtering processes was directed to maximize piezoelectric coefficients of the material, in such a way that dust deposition (and hence the soiling of the surface) can be treated as mechanical strain and thus detected, preserving at the same time all requirements of self-cleaning and optical clarity in the full solar range.
Moreover, considering the use of piezoelectricity to give sensing properties for detecting soiling on a solar mirror’s surface, and recognizing that zinc oxide (ZnO) is another transparent piezoelectric material [17], sputtered ZnO-based inorganic composites were investigated. The decision to incorporate zinc oxide into a transparent, insulating matrix was made to preserve the optical properties of solar mirrors, especially their refractive index. In this case, our goal was to evaluate both the piezoelectric and electrical conductivity properties of these composites, aiming to create a versatile sensing skin capable of providing different outputs for potential neural sensor architectures [18]. Additionally, such a system could be integrated into multimodal sensing systems designed to detect various stimuli, including light, pressure, and chemical changes, ultimately contributing to more accurate, brain-like behavior in artificial neural networks [19]. To achieve this, the sputtering process for ZnO-based composites was optimized to detect piezoelectric behavior, even when ZnO is dispersed within an insulating matrix, while also assessing the electrical properties of various composite films, all while maintaining the optical transmittance across the full solar spectrum and the self-cleaning capabilities of the material.

2. Materials and Methods

Aluminum nitrides were fabricated by means of sputtering deposition, using the proprietary multi-cathode sputtering custom built apparatus, named ENEA2, equipped with a process chamber and a load lock chamber. ENEA2 is the apparatus by which key technologies in the field of selective thin-film solar coatings for receiver tubes have been developed, patented, and transferred to the international industry [20]. The mirror substrate was positioned in front of the target in a planar configuration, and the fabrication process was reactive sputtering at an Ar + N2 pressure of 3 Pa with power supplied to the Al cathode of 1800 W for the auxetic phase and a pressure of 0.3 Pa with power supplied to the target of 3600 W for the piezoelectric phase.
Zinc oxide-based nanocomposites were fabricated by means of a solid-state reaction between thin films of ZnO and silicon obtained by means of a planar magnetron multi-cathode sputtering apparatus by Material Research Corporation Mod. MRC 643 (Orangeburg, NY, USA). Boron-doped Si and undoped ZnO sputter targets (dimensions: H = 38 cm and L = 12 cm) were used coupled with a bi-polar pulsed DC and an RF generator, respectively. Sputtering processes were carried out at pressures of 2.0 Pa, starting from a base vacuum of about 2 × 10−4 Pa.
The solid-state reaction was carried out in a vacuum at temperatures between 450 °C and 560 °C, with reaction times ranging from 3 to 6 h for conductive samples containing ZnO micro- or nano-domains, respectively. Solar mirrors substrates were purchased by Società Vetraria Biancaldese Spa, Biancade, Italy.
UV-VIS-NIR analysis was performed using a double-beam PerkinElmer mod (PerkinElmer, Springfield, IL, USA). Lambda 900 instrument, equipped with a 15 cm integrating sphere to measure global spectral reflectance and transmittance. The optical bandgap of phases constituting different composites was defined by UV-VIS-NIR reflectance and transmittance measurements, by means of Tauc’s plot method [21], assuming a direct transition for ZnO and silicates. The assumption of a direct transition for ZnO and zinc silicates is based on the known electronic structure and optical properties of these materials. ZnO, being a wide-bandgap semiconductor, exhibits a direct bandgap, which allows for the efficient absorption of light and direct electronic transitions. Similarly, zinc silicates are considered to follow a direct bandgap transition due to their crystalline structure and similar electronic characteristics to ZnO. This assumption is supported by previous studies, where direct transitions have been observed in these materials through optical characterization techniques [22,23].
The thickness of each sample was measured mechanically using a Tencor P-10 surface profiler (Tencor, Milpitas, CA, USA).
The Static Water Contact Angle (WCA) was measured with the direct optical method of drop-shape analysis, by means of the contact angle meter KRUSS DSA-100 (KRÜSS, Hamburg, Germany).
For testing electrical properties of different materials, two main configurations were utilized: planar and vertical. The first is achieved by means of electrical aluminum contact evaporation onto the film (with a known and regular geometry) and the second is achieved by interposing the film between a metallic sputtered thin W layer and an evaporated metallic contact, as shown in Figure 1.
For W deposition, the chamber was filled with 200 sccm of Argon at a pressure of 0.4 Pa. The DC power applied was 2500 W, the speed of translation was 500 mm/min, and the number of scans was 4.
X-ray diffraction analysis was performed using a Philips Panalytical X’ PERT PRO MRD diffractometer (Philips, Amsterdam, The Netherlands) working with CuKα radiation (λ = 1.54059 nm). The glancing incidence configuration was used to obtain high sensitivity to the film structure: the measurements were collected at incidence angles of 0.5° and 1° and using a scan range of 10°–100° ().
The microstructural investigation of ZnO composites on Si (100) was performed by TEM using a JEOL JEM 2010F TEM (JEOL, Peabody, MA, USA) operating at 200 kV acceleration voltage and equipped with a field emission gun. The system was imaged in cross-section and in plane-view using diffraction contrast, selected area electron diffraction (SAED), and high-resolution TEM (HRTEM). Standard TEM sample preparation was used. Optical measurements were performed at room temperature with an Agilent 8453E ultraviolet–visible spectrometer (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a resolution of 1 nm.
The piezoelectric response d33 of fabricated samples was measured by means of a D33meter POLIK (PolyK, State College, PA, USA).

3. Results and Discussion

Starting from the previous results about auxetic aluminum nitrides developed as ideal for substituting alumina as BSM self-cleaning skin, here the possibility of conferring sensing properties to this material was explored by utilizing its piezoelectric properties combined to the distributed sensing of a large area of deposition. When dust accumulates on a solar mirror, it exerts pressure on the surface. This pressure generates a piezoelectric signal in the mirror’s aluminum nitride coating, as shown in Figure 2. With a large area, the total pressure from dust accumulation is distributed over a large surface, resulting in a signal which is several orders of magnitude larger than the signal from a smaller area. Clearly, the maximization of piezoelectric behavior is crucial for exploiting the distributed sensitive performance.
So, the thin film AlN fabrication by means of a reactive sputtering process was directed to maximize the piezoelectric strain constant (d33) of the material, that can be correlated to dust deposition (considered as an applied force), and hence to the soiling of the surface.
From a structural perspective, the d33 piezoelectric coefficient of sputtered AlN films is highest when the material crystallizes in the hexagonal wurtzite phase and when its crystallites grow with a c-axis orientation [24]. The crystallographic phase and orientation are closely tied to the deposition technique used. Aluminum nitride thin films can be deposited using chemical vapor deposition (CVD), molecular beam epitaxy, or sputtering in either DC or AC mode [25]. The advantage of the selected reactive sputtering process is that it enables room-temperature deposition, with the c-axis orientation tunable through various process parameters, such as the discharge power/pressure ratio and the Ar/N2 gas flow ratio.
Even when sputtered thin films exhibit mixed orientations, it is still possible to maximize piezoelectric response. This is because, within the 10–200 nm thickness range required to ensure optical clarity across the full solar spectrum for self-cleaning purposes, the coatings naturally exhibit an intrinsic anisotropy due to their polycrystalline structure.
Extensive experimental work was dedicated to optimizing process conditions to balance optical transmittance, self-cleaning wettability (contact angle and WCA), and the maximization of the piezoelectric coefficient in sputtered AlN thin films.
Table 1 reports the defined magnetron sputtering conditions and WCA of auxetic, amorphous, and piezoelectric AlN self-cleaning coatings.
The measured contact angles (WCAs) are all greater than 90°, confirming self-cleaning behavior compared to uncoated mirrors. It should be noted that in a BSM, the layer exposed to air is alumina, which typically has contact angles around 40°. Therefore, replacing the alumina layer on the glass with an AlN layer, as previously explained, ensures self-cleaning properties, allowing the mirrors to be washed with a reduced amount of water [26].
Once the self-cleaning effect is preserved, we can focus on the piezoelectric properties. To maximize the piezoelectric behavior, process parameters were adjusted until the film became amorphous, followed by further modifications involving a significant reduction in process pressure and an increase in the power supplied to the aluminum target. Both conditions indicate a more energetic process, which promotes the coalescence of fine columnar wurtzite grains into larger ones.
Figure 3 presents the XRD spectra of both amorphous and piezoelectric films.
A greater thickness was chosen to enhance the overall piezoelectric response by increasing the generated voltage. However, it is important to note that further increasing the thickness could compromise the coating’s optical clarity across the full solar spectrum.
Increasing the thickness of the coating beyond a certain point may lead to light scattering and absorption, which would reduce the transparency of the film. This would be particularly problematic in the context of maintaining optical clarity across the full solar spectrum, as any reduction in transmittance could negatively impact the overall efficiency of solar mirror systems. Therefore, while thicker films can improve piezoelectric properties, the trade-off between thickness and optical clarity must be carefully balanced to ensure optimal performance for both the self-cleaning and reflective functions of the mirror.
To support this, it is useful to observe the UV-VIS-NIR transmittance trend of sputtered AlN thin coating films shown in Figure 4.
Starting with the XG glass substrate, one can observe the difference in transmittance of the films at varying thicknesses where it should be taken into account that the optimal optical behavior is the one closest to that of the uncoated substrate.
The piezoelectric coefficient d33 of the fabricated samples was measured, and for the selected sample AlNpiezo, it was found to be 1.8 pC/N under an applied force of 5 N. This value enables the use of this material as a piezoelectric soiling transducer, advancing the development of a soiling-detecting solar mirror skin.
Another useful property for detecting solar mirror failures in different configurations is a change in the coating’s electrical conductivity. The key idea is that a sensitive skin should be multifunctional, meaning that it should provide different outputs, similar to the smart materials used in the building sector [27].
In this way, the future step of fabricating a neural network of devices starting from selected materials can be simplified, choosing properties that can be easily integrated.
Aluminum nitrides are well known for their insulating properties, but ongoing studies are exploring doping with metallic particles to develop resistive composites capable of altering their electrical resistivity in response to various failure-related inputs.
Following this approach, we also tested another material as a potential sensitive solar mirror skin: a family of inorganic composites containing different amounts of zinc oxide (ZnO). These composites exhibit both piezoelectric properties—due to the combined effect of the thin film’s overall anisotropy and ZnO’s intrinsic piezoelectric behavior—and resistive properties, resulting from the presence of conductive crystalline ZnO islands embedded within an insulating silicate matrix. In other words, each composite can be optimized for a particular task (detecting failure, sensing soiling, monitoring relative humidity, and so on) depending on its specific electric behavior.
The fabrication of these composites was achieved through a solid-state reaction occurring at 450–560 °C between sputtered ultra-thin layers of silicon and zinc oxide. This process led to the formation of ZnO crystalline domains of different sizes within a transparent silicate matrix, which also provided self-cleaning capabilities.
Table 2 reports the defined experimental conditions and wetting contact angle (WCA) of ZnO composite self-cleaning coatings.
Before the reaction, the samples appeared opaque due to the stratification of the reagents. However, after undergoing the solid-state reaction (an annealing process at temperatures ranging from 450 to 560 °C), optical transmittance in the desired solar range was achieved.
In Figure 5, the optical transmittance of sample C 1-4 is reported.
TEM investigations, reported in Figure 6, confirm the presence of crystalline ZnO domains embedded in amorphous silicates.
Alternate regions appeared in terms of different brightness, and by energy electron loss spectroscopy (EELS) we verified they are correlated to the sheet silicate layer’s structure consisting of distorted tetrahedron SiO4 sheets (clear regions) and distorted octahedron MO6 sheets (dark regions), where M = Zn. Inside MO6 layers, two crystalline ZnO nanoaggregates appeared whose interplanar spacing gave a larger average value (2.57 Å) for both nanoaggregates, very close to the value (2.603 Å) of the lattice parameter in the (002) direction of the ZnO crystalline structure (wurzite).
Electrical characterization was performed to measure lateral and vertical resistivity in the configuration previously described and is reported in Table 3.
Low values for lateral resistivity (samples C 1-4, C 85-4, C 85-45, and C 85-45b) could be attributed to the presence of unreacted ZnO thin layers (crystalline phases with optical band gap determined by means of Tauc’s plot method are in the range 3.2–3.4 eV) giving a quasi-metallic transport mechanism. Regarding vertical resistivity, all the samples show middle–high values that can be justified in terms of larger/smaller interposed silicate layer thicknesses (or in terms of larger/smaller vertical spacing between ZnO domains).
In other terms, the observed electrical anisotropy is due to the presence of conductive p-type ZnO domains in the plane of the film layered with the insulating matrix in the vertical direction. When the dimensions of the ZnO domains are reduced to the nanometric range, the conductivity drops, because the insulation property of the silicate matrix prevails.
The piezoelectric coefficient d33 of fabricated samples was measured, and for the selected sample C 1-4, it was −0.8 pC/N under a 5 N applied force. This value, combined with the different lateral and vertical electrical conductivity, enables the utilization of such materials as sensitive skins of solar mirrors.

4. Conclusions

Self-cleaning transparent metamaterials were designed, fabricated, and characterized as solar mirror coatings with potential sensor capabilities for various parameters, including dust accumulation, humidity, erosion, aging, and failure detection.
AlN-based coatings were explored as soiling sensors due to their piezoelectric properties. Dust accumulation applies pressure on the coated mirror surface, which the piezoelectric material detects as an electrical signal. Distributed sensing plays a crucial role in this approach. Expanding the sensitive area not only enhances the piezoelectric signal beyond the noise threshold but also enables more precise monitoring of the entire mirror surface soiling, compensating for localized pressure variations caused by dust. Experimental work focused on optimizing sputtering process conditions to maximize piezoelectric performance, laying the groundwork for future research on the devices testing on field and sensitive area optimization.
ZnO composites were investigated as resistive sensors, capable of altering their electrical conductivity in response to failure events. Experimental efforts focused on defining the conditions for a solid-state reaction between sputtered silicon and zinc oxide reagents. This reaction generates a family of coatings with different concentrations of conductive micro- and nano ZnO domains, exhibiting anisotropic electrical resistivity. If a failure event (such as cracking, delamination, or thermal stress) occurs, it might alter the electrical conductivity of the material, providing a detectable signal.
This innovative approach integrates self-cleaning properties with electrical functionality while maintaining optical transparency, demonstrating promising potential for distributed sensing applications in solar coatings. The proposed materials are cost-effective, scalable, and versatile, making them well suited as sensitive solar reflector skins, whose adoption could significantly reduce field maintenance costs in solar power plants while making a first step toward the smartization of CSP technology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C.; methodology, A.C. and E.G.; software, E.G.; validation, A.C.; formal analysis, A.C.; investigation, A.C. and E.G.; resources, A.C.; data curation, E.G. and G.V.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C.; writing—review and editing, A.C. and E.G.; visualization, E.G.; supervision, A.C.; project administration, A.C.; funding acquisition, A.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was funded by the Italian Ministry of Environment and Energy Security through the “National Electric System Research” Programme—Project 1.9 “CSP/CST technology”, 2022–2024 implementation plan.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Khan, M.I.; Gutiérrez-Alvarez, R.; Asfand, F.; Bicer, Y.; Sgouridis, S.; Sami GAl-Ghamdi Hussam Jouhara, M. Asif, Tonni Agustiono Kurniawan, Muhammad Abid, Apostolos Pesyridis, Muhammad Farooq, The economics of concentrating solar power (CSP): Assessing cost competitiveness and deployment potential. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2024, 200, 114551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. El Boujdaini, L.; Mezrhab, A.; Moussaoui, M.A.; Carballo Lopez, J.A.; Wolfertstetter, F. The effect of soiling on the performance of solar mirror materials: Experimentation and modeling. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 53, 102741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Heimsath, A.; Heck, M.; Morin, G.; Kiewitt, W.; Platzer, W. Soiling of aluminum and glass mirrors under different climatic conditions and techno-economic optimization of cleaning intervals. In Proceedings of the SolarPACES, Perpignan, France, 21–24 September 2010; pp. 21–24. [Google Scholar]
  4. Elsherif, H.; Kandil, H.M. Fully-automated cleaning systems for Photovoltaic panels and reflectors. In Proceedings of the GUC Workshop on Renewable Energies and Smart Grid, Cairo, Egypt, 25–26 June 2011. [Google Scholar]
  5. Li, X.; Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Li, W.; Xu, N.; Huang, W. Analysis of life-cycle levelized cost of electricity for tower solar thermal power. Autom. Electr. Power Syst. 2015, 39, 84–88. [Google Scholar]
  6. Adak, D.; Bhattacharyya, R.; Barshilia, H.C. A state-of-the-art review on the multifunctional self-cleaning nanostructured coatings for PV panels, CSP mirrors and related solar devices. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 159, 112145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Dahlioui, D.; Wette, J.; Fernández-García, A.; Bouzekri, H.; Azpitarte, I. Performance assessment of the anti-soiling coating on solar mirrors soiling in the arid climate of Ouarzazate-Morocco. Solar Energy 2022, 241, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Villasante-Corredoira, C.; Mabe-Alvarez, J.; Les Aguerrea, I.; Peña-Lapuente, A.; Sanchez-Gonzalez, M.; Lopez, S. Smartcsp: Industry 4.0 Approach for an Effective Concentrated Solar Power (Csp) Cost Reduction. Dyna 2020, 95, 629–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aghaei, M.; Kolahi, M.; Nedaei, A.; Venkatesh, N.; Esmailifar, S.; Moradi Sizkouhi, A.; Aghamohammadi, A.; Oliveira, A.; Eskandari, A.; Parvin, P.; et al. Autonomous Intelligent Monitoring of Photovoltaic Systems: An In-Depth Multidisciplinary Review. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 2024, 33, 381–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Emamian, M.; Eskandari, A.; Aghaei, M.; Nedaei, A.; Sizkouhi, A.M.; Milimonfared, J. Cloud Computing and IoT Based Intelligent Monitoring System for Photovoltaic Plants Using Machine Learning Techniques. Energies 2022, 15, 3014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Castaldo, A.; Gambale, E.; Vitiello, G.; Lanchi, M.; Turchetti, L. Sensing Properties of Metamaterials Utilized as Self-cleaning Coating for Solar Mirrors Towards the “Talking Mirror. In Proceedings of the SolarPACES 2022, 28th International Conference on Concentrating Solar Power and Chemical Energy Systems Advanced Materials, Manufacturing, and Components, Albuquerque, NM, USA, 27–30 September 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Boretti, A. Concentrated Solar Power Plants Capacity Factors: A Review. In Nonlinear Approaches in Engineering Applications; Dai, L., Jazar, R., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mirror for a Solar Reflector, Method of Mirror Assembly and Management System in a Solar Field, Fundacion Cener Ciemat. WO 2018/069558 A1, 19 April 2018.
  14. Castaldo, A.; Gambale, E.; Vitiello, G. Aluminum Nitride Doping for Solar Mirrors Self Cleaning Coatings. Energies 2021, 14, 6668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. McKinlay, M.; Fleming, L.; García, M.P.; Sierra, L.N.; Castro, P.V.; Araujo, D.; García, B.J.; Gibson, D.; Nuñez, C.G. On the Piezoelectric Properties of Zinc Oxide Thin Films Synthesized by Plasma Assisted DC Sputter Deposition. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2024, 11, 2400252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ilse, K.; Micheli, L.; Figgis, B.W.; Lange, K.; Daßler, D.; Hanifi, H.; Wolfertstetter, F.; Naumann, V.; Hagendorf, C.; Gottschalg, R.; et al. Techno-Economic Assessment of Soiling Losses and Mitigation Strategies for Solar Power Generation. Joule 2019, 3, 2303–2321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Q. ZnO-based nanomaterials for brain-machine interface: Challenges and prospects. Nano Res. 2021, 14, 17–32. [Google Scholar]
  18. Liu, H.; Wang, H.; Wu, Z. Multimodal sensing devices based on ZnO nanowires: A review of sensing mechanisms and applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2018, 53, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  19. Schmidgall, S.; Ziaei, R.; Achterberg, J.; Kirsch, L.; Hajiseyedrazi, S.P.; Eshraghian, J. Brain-inspired learning in artificial neural networks: A review. APL Mach. Learn. 2024, 2, 021501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Esposito, S.; D’Angelo, A.; Antonaia, A.; Castaldo, A.; Ferrara, M.; Addonizio, M.L.; Guglielmo, A. Optimization procedure and fabrication of highly efficient and thermally stable solar coating for receivers operating at high temperature. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 102, 91–107. [Google Scholar]
  21. Murayama, K.; Toyama, T.; Miyazaki, S.; Hirose, M. Fundamental absorption edge spectrum of ultrathin a-Si: H film in a-Si: Ha-Si3N4: H multilayer obtained from luminescence excitation spectrum. Solid State Commun. 1997, 104, 119–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Iacona, F.; Bongiorno, C.; Spinella, C.; Boninelli, C.; Priolo, F. Formation and evolution of luminescent Si nanoclusters produced by thermal annealing of SiOx films. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 95, 3723–3732. [Google Scholar]
  23. Ren, S.Y.; Dow, J.D. Thermal Conductivity of superlattices. Phys. Rev. B 1992, 45, 6492. [Google Scholar]
  24. Ohta, J.; Fujioka, H.; Sumiya, M.; Furusawa, M.; Yoshimoto, M.; Koinuma, H.; Oshima, M. Epitaxial Growth of AlN on Si(111) by Laser MBE. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Nitride Semiconductors, Tokyo, Japan, 24–27 September 2000. [Google Scholar]
  25. Iriarte, F.; Rodríguez, J.G.; Calle, F. Synthesis of c-axis oriented AlN thin films on different substrates: A review. Mater. Res. Bull. 2010, 45, 1039–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Castaldo, A.; Gambale, E.; Vitiello, G.; Cara, G. Self-Cleaning Solar Mirror Coatings: From the Laboratory Scale to Prototype Field Tests. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 6669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhang, W. Smart Building Skin Design with Dynamic Climate Adaptability of Smart Cities Based on Artificial Intelligence. Adv. Multimed. 2023, 2023, 2859195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Representative scheme of devices for electrical characterization of thin composite films: (a) planar configuration, where contacts are strips of evaporated aluminum placed at known distances; (b) vertical configuration, where contacts are a thin W lower layer and a strip of aluminum upper layer.
Figure 1. Representative scheme of devices for electrical characterization of thin composite films: (a) planar configuration, where contacts are strips of evaporated aluminum placed at known distances; (b) vertical configuration, where contacts are a thin W lower layer and a strip of aluminum upper layer.
Applsci 15 03696 g001
Figure 2. Working mechanism diagram: the direct piezoelectric effect of an AlN surface, on which the deposited dust exerts a compressive force that can be converted into an electric potential.
Figure 2. Working mechanism diagram: the direct piezoelectric effect of an AlN surface, on which the deposited dust exerts a compressive force that can be converted into an electric potential.
Applsci 15 03696 g002
Figure 3. XRD patterns for amorphous (AlN_am) and piezoelectric (AlN_piezo) films.
Figure 3. XRD patterns for amorphous (AlN_am) and piezoelectric (AlN_piezo) films.
Applsci 15 03696 g003
Figure 4. UV-VIS-NIR transmittance of AlN films of different thickness in comparison to the glass substrate Eagle XG.
Figure 4. UV-VIS-NIR transmittance of AlN films of different thickness in comparison to the glass substrate Eagle XG.
Applsci 15 03696 g004
Figure 5. UV-VIS-NIR transmittance of sample C 1-4.
Figure 5. UV-VIS-NIR transmittance of sample C 1-4.
Applsci 15 03696 g005
Figure 6. TEM analysis of sample C1-4. (a) Cross-section images EFTEM, (b) EELS, (c) HRTEM, and (d) HRTEM ZnO nano-crystallites.
Figure 6. TEM analysis of sample C1-4. (a) Cross-section images EFTEM, (b) EELS, (c) HRTEM, and (d) HRTEM ZnO nano-crystallites.
Applsci 15 03696 g006
Table 1. Experimental fabrication conditions and WCA of auxetic and piezoelectric AlN.
Table 1. Experimental fabrication conditions and WCA of auxetic and piezoelectric AlN.
SamplePower Target
(W)
Pressure
(Pa)
Ar Flux
(sccm)
N2 Flux
(sccm)
Thickness
(nm)
WCA
(°)
AlNpiezoP = 3600 W0.420070341 ± 1.595.3 ± 1.0
I = 5.90 A
V = 618 V
AlNauxP = 1800 W42009096.1 ± 0.3100.8 ± 2
I = 6.8 A
V = 269 V
AlNamP = 1800 W2.420070219.5 ± 0.590.3 ± 1.0
I = 6.80 A
V = 270 V
Table 2. Experimental conditions and WCA of different composites.
Table 2. Experimental conditions and WCA of different composites.
SamplePower ZnO Target
(W)
Power Si Target
(W)
Pressure (Pa)Reaction Temperature
(°C)
Thickness [nm]WCA
(°)
C 1-410004000.556031094.4 ± 0.7
C 85-48504000.556030094.4 ± 0.7
C 85-45 8504502.056032093.4 ± 1.2
C 85-45 b8504502.045028096.8 ± 1.1
Table 3. Lateral ρ‖ and vertical ρ⊥ electrical resistivity values.
Table 3. Lateral ρ‖ and vertical ρ⊥ electrical resistivity values.
Sampleρ‖ [Ω cm]ρ⊥ [Ω cm]c-ZnO
C 1-4164.7 × 104present
C 85-41.6 × 1081.4 × 105not present
C 85-452.6 × 1072.1 × 104not present
C 85-45b51.8 × 103present
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Castaldo, A.; Gambale, E.; Vitiello, G. From Self-Cleaning to Self-Aware Solar Mirror Skin. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 3696. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15073696

AMA Style

Castaldo A, Gambale E, Vitiello G. From Self-Cleaning to Self-Aware Solar Mirror Skin. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(7):3696. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15073696

Chicago/Turabian Style

Castaldo, Anna, Emilia Gambale, and Giuseppe Vitiello. 2025. "From Self-Cleaning to Self-Aware Solar Mirror Skin" Applied Sciences 15, no. 7: 3696. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15073696

APA Style

Castaldo, A., Gambale, E., & Vitiello, G. (2025). From Self-Cleaning to Self-Aware Solar Mirror Skin. Applied Sciences, 15(7), 3696. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15073696

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop