Next Article in Journal
Electricity Demand Forecasting Using Deep Polynomial Neural Networks and Gene Expression Programming During COVID-19 Pandemic
Previous Article in Journal
Solution to the Inverse Problem of the Angular Manipulator Kinematics with Six Degrees of Freedom
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Analysis of Three-Dimensional Micro-Contact Morphology of Contact Groups Based on Superpixel AMR Morphological Features and Fractal Theory

Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(5), 2842; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052842
by Jiahang Shen 1, Defeng Cui 2, Wenhua Li 1,*, Peidong Zhao 1, Xianchun Meng 1, Jiyuan Cai 3, Zheng Han 1 and Haitao Wang 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(5), 2842; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052842
Submission received: 12 January 2025 / Revised: 23 February 2025 / Accepted: 26 February 2025 / Published: 6 March 2025

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

-         The paper must be improved with two new secions: Experiments and Discussions;

-         P.1, in Abstract: Put some numerical values from the paper;

-         P.1: Improve the quality of section 1. Adding at least 10 references from the last 5 years;

-         P.3, Fig.1: Why did you choose this electrical contact configuration? Is it the most representative and frequently encountered? Why didn't you study other types of electrical contacts? For which current values ​​were the simulations/experiments carried out?

-         P.3, Table 1: What types of alloys/materials did you analyze for electrical contacts?

-         In all paper: Put references at Eqs.;

-         P.6, Fig.4: What do figures a-d represent?

-         P.17, before section 5: Put a new consistent sections Experiments: min. 3 pp. Adding a new section Discussions min 2 pp.

-         P.17, Section 5: What future research results from this paper?

-         P.18, at References: Adding at least 10 references from the last 5 years.

Author Response

The experimental and discussion sections need to be added: Instead of adding new chapters, the sample test conditions, sample introduction, and equipment parameters are appended in a separate table in the introduction section of Chapter 1;

The rest has been modified according to the revision suggestions.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear Authors,

your paper is interesting. Please make required corrections:

1. At the beginning of your paper the terms surface morphological features and surface roughness appear interchangeably. Please explain this so that the reader has no doubts. It is best to refer to ISO standards.

2. Introduction / state-of-art -  It is worth adding a reference to another paper describing similar issues: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2024.104637 In this paper, surfaces are described using fractal dimensions and other multiscale parameters to describe the microwear of these surfaces after contact between the wear surface and the wear tool surface.

3. Chapter 2. - Text shouldn`t be written under chapter 2, but under chapter 2.1.

4. Fig. 1 - please state the conditions of this contact of two surfaces.

5. chapter 2.2. - please describe material.

6. Line 229 - please provide manufacturer of the device (3D microscope), ale please provide parameters of the measuerements (magnification, field of view, resolution, etc.)

7. Please check units in table 3.

Author Response

This paper has been modified according to the revision suggestions, please see the attachment in the box.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors
  • The paper must be improved with two new secions: Experiments and Discussions;
  • 3, Fig.1: Why did you choose this electrical contact configuration? Is it the most representative and frequently encountered? Why didn't you study other types of electrical contacts? For which current values ​​were the simulations/experiments carried out?
  • In all paper: Put references at Eqs.;

P.17, before section 5: Put a new consistent sections Experiments: min. 3 pp. Adding a new section Discussions min 2 pp.

Author Response

Comments 1: [The paper must be improved with two new secions: Experiments and Discussions;]

Response: This two sections has been added to before section 5.

Comments 2: [3, Fig.1: Why did you choose this electrical contact configuration? Is it the most representative and frequently encountered? Why didn't you study other types of electrical contacts? For which current values ​​were the simulations/experiments carried out?]

Response: This has been explained in the section Experiments.

Comments 3: [In all paper: Put references at Eqs.;]

Response: The references of the equations have been added on lines 151, 181, 294, 324, 356 and 366.

Comments 4: [P.17, before section 5: Put a new consistent sections Experiments: min. 3 pp. Adding a new section Discussions min 2 pp.]

Response: This two sections has been added to before section 5.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop