Next Article in Journal
Failure Law of Sandstone and Identification of Premonitory Deterioration Information Based on Digital Image Correlation–Acoustic Emission Multi-Source Information Fusion
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Posture and Sleep Duration on Heart Rate Variability in Older Subjects
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Comparison of Lower Limb Range of Motion in Male University Soccer Athletes with Ankle Injuries Versus Those Without

Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(5), 2505; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052505
by Qi Wang 1, Xiao Zhou 1,*, Mengxin Cui 2, Ziwen Mu 1, Hanyan Yan 1, Kazuhiro Imai 3, Shaoshuai Shen 4, Tomohiro Kimura 5 and Hongtao Zeng 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(5), 2505; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052505
Submission received: 25 January 2025 / Revised: 22 February 2025 / Accepted: 23 February 2025 / Published: 26 February 2025

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors, please see the comments within the PDF file.

Kind regards

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We are grateful for very helpful comments. We have revised the paper accordingly. Please see the attached file. Thank you very much.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Thank you for the invitation to review this article. I appreciate the opportunity to contribute to the academic community by providing feedback on this work. The manuscript is well-prepared and presents interesting findings, but it requires some revisions before it can be accepted for publication.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Thank you for the invitation to review this article. I appreciate the opportunity to contribute to the academic community by providing feedback on this work. The manuscript is well-prepared and presents interesting findings, but it requires some revisions before it can be accepted for publication.

Author Response

We are grateful for very helpful comments. We have revised the paper accordingly. Please see the attached file. Thank you very much.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

I SUGGEST MINOR REVISIONS. SEE PDF FILE

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attached file.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop