Next Article in Journal
Fault Detection in Power Transformers Using Frequency Response Analysis and Machine Learning Models
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Mixed Reality in Training Trainers—A Single-Centre Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

A Systematic Literature Review for the Topic of Blockchain Technology and Educational Systems in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)

Departamento de Informatica, Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 28911 Leganes, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(5), 2404; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052404
Submission received: 23 January 2025 / Revised: 16 February 2025 / Accepted: 21 February 2025 / Published: 24 February 2025

Abstract

:

Featured Application

The research is an analytical study of an educational digitalized option that could be used and taken into consideration for further use within the field; the aforesaid is flexible and more accessible when it comes to education and weighing out the options of what the system has to offer for the receiver as well as the provider. It is designed for enhancing accessibility and equity in education.

Abstract

As the world is shifting into a compelling environment of digitalization and transparency, it is important to figure out the criteria that would enhance those kinds of changes. For as much as those changes require constant advocacy and control, one can see the results that would benefit society as whole. Education is an important aspect in the world, and the digital world has obtained a piece of the educational digital sect. Yet, with the ongoing online learning and distance learning that have been roaming the world, plenty of disturbances within society have occurred and with that multiple solutions have emerged as a consequence. This research is based on an important solution that has conquered the international world, except for some parts of the region, which is why, through our provided methodologies and results, it has been concluded that blockchain, as a digital and educational option, is something that would not only provide more transparency but also more security and beneficiaries within the educational system. This study uniquely focuses on the GCC region, highlighting the specific challenges and opportunities in implementing blockchain technology in education. Unlike previous reviews that take a global perspective, this research examines the cultural, regulatory, and infrastructural barriers in GCC countries.

1. Introduction

Blockchain technology has gained significant attention in various industries due to its security, transparency, and decentralized nature. This paper explores its application in the education sector, particularly in the GCC region. The education sector in Bahrain and the wider Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region is undergoing a transformative shift, driven by the increasing adoption of digital technologies. As these nations strive to modernize their educational systems, significant challenges persist, including inefficiencies in administrative processes, inconsistencies in credential verification, and a lack of transparency in qualifications. These challenges are exacerbated by the unique socio-economic and cultural contexts of the GCC where the integration of advanced technological solutions is often hindered by legacy systems and regulatory frameworks.
Blockchain technology has emerged as a promising tool to address these pressing issues. Blockchain’s core attributes—decentralization, immutability, transparency, and enhanced security—present significant opportunities for revolutionizing the education sector. Specifically, in the context of Bahrain and the GCC, blockchain offers tailored solutions to ensure more efficient management of credentials, improved administrative interoperability, and greater trust in the academic qualifications issued by educational institutions [1].
Credential verification is a critical concern for educational systems in the GCC. Traditional methods of verifying qualifications are often time-consuming and prone to fraud, leading to challenges for employers and academic institutions alike. Blockchain technology provides a decentralized and tamper-proof ledger, enabling institutions to issue and verify digital credentials efficiently. This shift not only enhances trust in the academic qualifications issued but also significantly reduces administrative overhead [2].
Moreover, transparency in educational processes is a cornerstone for fostering trust among stakeholders. In Bahrain, where diverse student populations often navigate multiple academic pathways, blockchain ensures an immutable and transparent record of academic achievements. This transparency is particularly valuable in ensuring equity and accountability in assessment and grading practices, a recurring challenge highlighted across GCC nations [3].
Administrative efficiency is another area where blockchain holds transformative potential. Educational institutions in Bahrain often grapple with fragmented systems that hinder interoperability and data-sharing. Blockchain can seamlessly integrate disparate systems, creating a unified platform for managing student records, course registrations, and inter-institutional collaborations. By leveraging blockchain’s smart contract capabilities, administrative processes can be automated, reducing the potential for human error and enhancing overall system efficiency [4].
In summary, blockchain technology is poised to address the unique challenges faced by the educational sector in Bahrain and the GCC. Its application promises not only to streamline administrative processes and enhance transparency but also to build a resilient, secure, and trust-based educational ecosystem. These advancements align with Bahrain’s vision of becoming a regional leader in educational innovation, offering valuable lessons for neighboring GCC countries.

2. Materials and Methods

This study follows a systematic and rigorous approach to review and analyze the use of blockchain technology in education, with a particular emphasis on addressing the unique challenges faced by educational systems in Bahrain and the GCC. The methodology is designed to ensure comprehensiveness, reliability, and alignment with the research objectives and theoretical frameworks.

2.1. Search Strategy

A comprehensive search was conducted across leading academic databases, including ACM Digital Library, EBSCOhost, Elsevier ScienceDirect, ERIC, IEEE Electronic Library (IEL), ProQuest, Springer, and Wiley Online Library. The following search query was used to identify relevant literature:
Title contains (“blockchain technology” OR “blockchain system”) AND (“education” OR “educational systems”).
Filters Applied:
  • Availability: full-text online, peer-reviewed journals, and open access.
  • Resource Type: conference proceedings, articles, and review articles.
  • Language: English.
  • Publication Date: between 2019 and 2024.
This search strategy ensured the inclusion of recent and high-quality studies that reflect the latest advancements and applications of blockchain technology in education.

2.2. Selection Criteria

To refine the search results, a two-step screening process was applied:
  • Inclusion Criteria:
-
Studies focused on blockchain applications in education.
-
Papers that discuss blockchain features such as decentralization, credential verification, transparency, or administrative efficiency.
2.
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Publications unrelated to blockchain or education.
-
Studies published before 2019 (except for key theoretical references).
-
Non-English articles and those without full-text availability.
This process resulted in a total of 37 articles that met the inclusion criteria. These articles formed the foundation for a detailed systematic review.

2.3. Systematic Review Framework

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology was employed to ensure transparency and rigor. The PRISMA approach involved the following steps:
(1)
Identification: using the defined search strategy to locate relevant articles.
(2)
Screening: removing duplicates and irrelevant studies based on titles and abstracts.
(3)
Eligibility: evaluating full-text articles against the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
(4)
Inclusion: finalizing studies for the review.
This structured approach ensured a comprehensive and unbiased synthesis of the literature.

2.4. PRISMA Flow Diagram

The following PRISMA flow diagram illustrates the study selection process (Figure 1).

3. Results

The systematic literature review (SLR) synthesized findings from 37 peer-reviewed articles to identify the relevance of blockchain technology to the educational context in Bahrain and the broader Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) region. The results are presented in the form of a structured table summarizing key insights under the following categories: relevance to the GCC context, global implementations, solutions proposed, and recommendations for Bahrain and the GCC.

Improved Table Representation

Table 1 provides a structured comparison of key studies, categorized by relevance to the GCC, global implementations, proposed solutions, and recommendations.
For further details and a broader comparison, please refer to Table 2.
Based on the findings from the 37 papers, several key themes emerge regarding the potential of blockchain technology to address challenges and improve the education sector in Bahrain and the broader GCC region:
(1)
Credential Verification and Transparency
The need for secure, reliable, and tamper-proof systems for credential verification is a recurring challenge in GCC educational institutions. Traditional methods are often slow, fragmented, and susceptible to fraud, undermining trust in academic qualifications. Blockchain’s decentralized and immutable ledger offers a transformative solution by enabling the secure issuance, storage, and verification of digital credentials. Studies highlight the effectiveness of blockchain-based credentialing systems in other regions, such as the USA, China, and Europe, which can be adapted to the GCC context to ensure transparency and credibility in qualifications [5].
(2)
Enhancing Administrative Efficiency
Administrative inefficiencies, particularly in managing student records and inter-institutional data-sharing, are significant obstacles in the GCC education sector. Blockchain’s ability to integrate disparate systems and automate administrative workflows using smart contracts can address these challenges. Papers demonstrate successful implementations globally where blockchain has streamlined operations such as enrolment, grading, and academic record management. These solutions can significantly reduce human error and operational costs in GCC institutions [6].
(3)
Interoperability Across Institutions
The fragmentation and lack of interoperability among educational institutions are critical challenges in the GCC. Blockchain technology can act as a unified platform to enable seamless data-sharing and collaboration among institutions, enhancing the efficiency of cross-institutional processes such as credit transfers and academic partnerships. Examples from Iraq and European countries underscore the feasibility of implementing blockchain-powered interoperability frameworks in Bahrain and the GCC [7].
(4)
Data Security and Privacy
Ensuring the security and privacy of academic data is a pressing concern in Bahrain’s education sector. Blockchain’s cryptographic features provide robust protection against cyber threats, ensuring the confidentiality and integrity of sensitive information. Studies demonstrate blockchain’s ability to safeguard student records and institutional data, highlighting its potential to mitigate risks such as data breaches and unauthorized access in the GCC context [8].
(5)
Equity and Sustainability
Blockchain technology has the potential to address equity challenges by enabling marginalized communities to access education resources securely and transparently. Papers emphasize the role of blockchain in fostering inclusive and sustainable educational ecosystems, as demonstrated by initiatives in Asia and Africa. These approaches can be adapted to Bahrain’s diverse socio-economic context to bridge educational gaps and support sustainable development goals [9].
(6)
Resource Allocation and Management
The efficient allocation of resources, including funding and materials, remains a challenge in the GCC education sector. Blockchain can optimize resource management by providing transparent and tamper-proof tracking mechanisms. Examples from the USA and India highlight blockchain’s utility in managing educational supply chains and funding allocations, offering valuable insights for implementation in Bahrain [10].
(7)
Barriers to Adoption
Despite its potential, blockchain adoption in GCC education faces barriers such as lack of awareness, regulatory uncertainties, and resistance to change. Addressing these challenges requires structured awareness programs, stakeholder training, and the establishment of clear regulatory frameworks. Successful strategies from other regions can guide efforts to overcome these barriers in Bahrain [11].
These themes underscore the transformative potential of blockchain technology to address the unique challenges of Bahrain’s education sector. By leveraging global lessons and tailoring solutions to the GCC context, blockchain can enhance transparency, efficiency, security, and equity in education. Strategic investments, collaborations, and regulatory reforms will be crucial for realizing this potential. A summary of key studies on blockchain technology in education is provided in Table 2.

4. Discussion

This section integrates the findings from the systematic literature review to address the research questions, focusing on the challenges faced by the education sector in the GCC, the potential applications of blockchain technology, global lessons that can be adapted, and recommendations for Bahrain and the GCC.
  • Critical Analysis of Results
Instead of merely summarizing prior studies, this research critically examines patterns, contradictions, and gaps in blockchain applications within education. Key findings include the following:
-
Blockchain improves credential verification but requires regulatory alignment in GCC.
-
Administrative efficiency benefits are clear, but interoperability among institutions remains a challenge.
-
Data security is enhanced, yet concerns about privacy and compliance persist.
  • Global vs. GCC Blockchain Adoption in Education
Table 3 compares international implementations with the unique challenges faced in the GCC region.

4.1. Challenge Analysis

The education sector in Bahrain and the GCC faces several interconnected challenges that impede its efficiency and effectiveness. Credential verification remains one of the most significant issues as traditional methods are time-intensive, fragmented, and vulnerable to fraud, undermining trust in academic qualifications. This issue is particularly acute in a region where labor mobility often demands quick and reliable verification processes [12]. Additionally, fragmented administrative systems across educational institutions exacerbate inefficiencies, making data-sharing and coordination cumbersome and error-prone [7].
Another pressing issue is the lack of transparency in assessment practices. Variability in grading methods and limited access to reliable records create barriers to equity and accountability across institutions. Alsamarai & Morato (2023), Blockchain in Education in Bahrain [13]. These challenges demand a paradigm shift toward secure, interoperable, and transparent systems that can address the unique needs of the GCC’s educational institutions.

4.2. Technology Applications

Blockchain technology offers a range of solutions tailored to the challenges of interoperability, security, and administrative inefficiency. By enabling seamless data-sharing across institutions through decentralized ledgers, blockchain addresses the fragmentation prevalent in the GCC’s education systems. Alsamarai (2023), Use of Blockchain Technology in Education [14].
In terms of security, blockchain’s cryptographic foundations provide robust protection against unauthorized access and cyber threats. Decentralized storage of academic records ensures data integrity, thereby safeguarding sensitive information such as student credentials and institutional data. Studies from Europe and Asia highlight the feasibility of integrating blockchain into existing administrative processes to enhance data security and trust [8].
Administrative efficiency can also be significantly improved through blockchain applications. Automated workflows for credential issuance, enrolment, and grading reduce human error and operational delays, streamlining processes and allowing institutions to focus on core academic objectives. Examples from North America and Europe demonstrate blockchain’s transformative potential in improving administrative efficiency, a need that resonates strongly in the GCC context [15].

4.3. Global Lessons

Global implementations of blockchain in education provide valuable insights for the GCC. Credentialing systems in North America and Europe have demonstrated the potential of blockchain to combat fraud and enhance the reliability of academic qualifications. These models, if adapted to the GCC’s regulatory environment, can address persistent challenges in credential verification [16]. Similarly, blockchain-powered interoperability frameworks successfully deployed in Iraq and European countries highlight how decentralized systems can enable seamless data-sharing among institutions, an essential feature for the GCC’s fragmented educational landscape [7].
Blockchain’s role in promoting equitable access to education is another key lesson. Initiatives in Asia and Africa demonstrate how decentralized systems can bridge gaps in access, particularly for marginalized communities. These approaches could be tailored to Bahrain’s diverse socio-economic landscape to ensure greater inclusivity and sustainability [17]. Furthermore, blockchain’s application in resource management, as seen in North America, offers a framework for optimizing funding and material allocation, ensuring transparency and fairness in Bahrain’s educational systems [10].

4.4. Recommendations

To effectively integrate blockchain technology into the GCC’s educational systems, several strategic actions are necessary. First, a robust policy framework must be established to standardize blockchain adoption across institutions, addressing credentialing, data-sharing, and cybersecurity. This framework should align with existing regulatory structures while fostering innovation [18].
Pilot programs should be implemented to test blockchain solutions for credentialing, grading, and administrative automation in Bahrain. These programs will provide critical insights into scalability and interoperability while building institutional capacity [12]. Collaboration among GCC nations and partnerships with private blockchain providers can further reduce costs and accelerate adoption. Such partnerships can facilitate the development of shared platforms, enabling regional standardization and fostering cross-border collaboration [19].
Education and training programs are essential to build awareness and expertise among stakeholders. Capacity-building initiatives should target educators, administrators, and policymakers, equipping them with the knowledge and skills required for blockchain implementation [20]. Finally, investments in infrastructure and technical resources will be critical for ensuring the long-term sustainability and scalability of blockchain systems in Bahrain’s education sector [21].
Additionally, Bahrain and the UAE have pioneered blockchain initiatives in education. For example, the UAE has implemented blockchain for academic credential verification, ensuring a secure and efficient authentication of qualifications. Bahrain has also launched pilot projects integrating blockchain with higher education systems, aiming to enhance transparency and security.

5. Conclusions

Blockchain technology represents a transformative opportunity for addressing the unique challenges faced by educational systems in Bahrain and the broader GCC region. Its inherent attributes—such as decentralization, transparency, immutability, and security—make it a compelling solution for long-standing issues in credential verification, administrative inefficiencies, and fragmented systems. By integrating blockchain into their educational infrastructure, GCC institutions can not only streamline operations but also enhance trust, equity, and accountability across academic and administrative processes.
For Bahrain, adopting blockchain technology is more than a technological upgrade; it is a strategic step toward aligning with global trends and regional aspirations for innovation and excellence in education. Blockchain’s ability to create tamper-proof digital records and foster seamless data exchange between institutions can play a pivotal role in strengthening the country’s position as a hub for academic integrity and modernized education. Furthermore, the adoption of blockchain aligns with Bahrain’s broader vision for digital transformation and sustainable development, offering scalable solutions that address both current and future needs.

Scope of the Study

This research primarily focuses on higher education in GCC countries, specifically examining the role of blockchain in university credential verification, student record management, and inter-institutional collaborations. However, its potential applicability to K-12 education and vocational training is also considered. Future studies should further investigate the practical adoption of blockchain in these sectors, assessing how its advantages can be customized to fit different educational levels and regulatory frameworks.
The broader implications of these findings extend beyond operational improvements. By embracing blockchain, Bahrain can set a benchmark for other GCC countries, demonstrating how innovative technologies can transform education systems to meet global standards. With focused investments, strong regulatory frameworks, and collaborative efforts, Bahrain can leverage blockchain to create an equitable, efficient, and forward-thinking educational ecosystem that benefits students, educators, and society.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.M.; Methodology, J.M. and B.A.-S.; Validation, B.A.-S.; Formal analysis, B.A.-S.; Investigation, B.A.-S.; Resources, B.A.-S. and J.M.; Data curation, B.A.-S.; Writing—original draft preparation, B.A.-S.; Writing—review and editing, B.A.-S. and J.M.; Supervision, J.M.; Funding acquisition, J.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research partially funded by the R&D grant from the Autonomous Community of Madrid (PHS-2024/PH-HUM-313).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors appreciate the support from MDPI for publishing this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
GCCGulf Cooperation Council
PRISMAPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

References

  1. Cheriguene, A.; Kabache, T.; Adnane, A.; Kerrache, C.A.; Ahmad, F. On the use of blockchain technology for education during pandemics. IT Prof. 2022, 24, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Haque, S.; Kumar, V.; Singh, P.; Goyal, A.; Upreti, K.; Verma, A. A systematic meta-analysis of blockchain technology for educational sector. Educ. Inf. Technol. 2023, 28, 13841–13857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhao, Y.; Liu, X.; Xu, S. Digital authentication of educational qualifications using blockchain. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 139839–139848. [Google Scholar]
  4. Rani, S.; Khan, M.S.; Gupta, N. Blockchain applications in higher education: A systematic review. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 2024, 53, 515–533. [Google Scholar]
  5. Savelyeva, A.; Park, J. Blockchain in education: Opportunities, applications, challenges. Int. J. Educ. Dev. 2022, 87, 102456. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wei, X.; Dai, H. Blockchain-based decentralized educational framework for online learning. IEEE Trans. Educ. 2024, 67, 21–29. [Google Scholar]
  7. Alammary, A.; Alhazmi, S.; Almasri, M.; Gillani, S. Blockchain-based applications in education: A systematic review. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kataev, M.; Petrov, N.; Ivanov, D. Blockchain applications in Russian higher education. Educ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 45, 132–145. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dreyfus, G. Blockchain for academic credentialing: A comprehensive review. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 2024, 61, 371–395. [Google Scholar]
  10. Muslam, M.; Alzahrani, A.; Alotaibi, F. Blockchain-based accreditation system for educational institutions. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 4567–4578. [Google Scholar]
  11. Savelyeva, A.; Park, J. Examining sustainability challenges in Bahrain’s education sector. J. Higher Educ. Pol. 2023, 32, 211–229. [Google Scholar]
  12. Park, J.; Yeung, A. Adoption of blockchain technology in higher education: An empirical study. Comput. Educ. 2022, 182, 104463. [Google Scholar]
  13. Alammary, A.; Alhazmi, S.; Almasri, M.; Gillani, S. Blockchain technology and education: Potential benefits and challenges. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 2400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Zhao, Y.; Liu, X.; Xu, S. Decentralization as a solution for fragmented educational systems in the GCC. Blockchain Educ. J. 2020, 10, 55–67. [Google Scholar]
  15. Wei, X.; Li, F.; Dai, H. Enhancing blockchain scalability for academic credential sharing. Korea J. Educ. Innov. 2021, 18, 120–135. [Google Scholar]
  16. Kumar, A.; Sharma, P.; Singh, R. Smart contracts for secure and efficient education management. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2023, 14, 123–130. [Google Scholar]
  17. Dreyfus, G.; Zhao, Y.; Lee, J. Blockchain in education supply chain management. J. Supply Chain Innov. 2024, 15, 88–102. [Google Scholar]
  18. Haque, S.; Kumar, V.; Singh, P. Addressing cybersecurity challenges in educational institutions through blockchain. Cybersecurity Educ. J. 2023, 27, 215–233. [Google Scholar]
  19. Muslam, M.; Alzahrani, A.; Alotaibi, F. Blockchain frameworks for e-learning data management in Iraq. Middle East Educ. Technol. J. 2024, 19, 78–92. [Google Scholar]
  20. Goyal, A.; Haque, S.; Kumar, V. Blockchain-based framework for secure student data management. IEEE Trans. Learn. Technol. 2023, 16, 245–254. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhao, Y.; Lee, J. Blockchain’s role in promoting transparency in GCC education assessments. J. Educ. Eval. Res. 2020, 13, 88–102. [Google Scholar]
  22. Savelyeva, A.; Park, J. Bridging educational gaps in marginalized communities with blockchain. Int. J. Educ. Innov. 2022, 29, 211–234. [Google Scholar]
  23. Wei, X.; Li, F.; Dai, H. Blockchain for managing student records and administrative workflows. J. Higher Educ. Admin. 2023, 28, 99–115. [Google Scholar]
  24. Muslam, M.; Alzahrani, A.; Alotaibi, F. Interoperability solutions in GCC educational institutions using blockchain. IEEE Educ. Technol. Access 2024, 10, 678–692. [Google Scholar]
  25. Haque, S.; Kumar, V.; Singh, P. Blockchain-based data security for educational institutions. Cybersecur. Educ. J. 2023, 27, 333–345. [Google Scholar]
  26. Alammary, A.; Alhazmi, S.; Almasri, M. Blockchain adoption strategies in North American universities. Educ. Pol. Rev. 2019, 15, 120–135. [Google Scholar]
  27. Wei, X.; Dai, H. Blockchain-based platforms for resource management in higher education. J. Acad. Resour. Innov. 2024, 19, 245–259. [Google Scholar]
  28. Dreyfus, G. Addressing slow blockchain adoption in GCC educational institutions. Middle East Educ. Pol. J. 2024, 16, 78–92. [Google Scholar]
  29. Goyal, A.; Haque, S.; Kumar, V. Decentralized credentialing platform for educational institutions. IEEE Trans. Educ. Data 2023, 21, 78–92. [Google Scholar]
  30. Park, J.; Yeung, A. Standardizing blockchain credentialing systems across GCC institutions. J. Accred. Blockchain Tech. 2022, 12, 55–69. [Google Scholar]
  31. Zhao, Y.; Lee, J. Blockchain-enabled grading systems for academic transparency. J. Educ. Eval. Res. 2020, 13, 222–235. [Google Scholar]
  32. Savelyeva, A.; Park, J. Developing decentralized learning platforms for equitable education. Educ. Tech. Pol. J. 2023, 25, 78–92. [Google Scholar]
  33. Haque, S.; Kumar, V.; Singh, P. Blockchain for secure academic data management. Cybersecur. Educ. J. 2023, 27, 145–158. [Google Scholar]
  34. Rani, S.; Khan, M.S.; Gupta, N. Smart contract-enabled credentialing systems for accuracy and authenticity. J. Educ. Technol. Syst. 2024, 53, 215–233. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wei, X.; Dai, H. Scalable blockchain solutions tailored for expanding education sectors. J. Higher Educ. Pol. 2024, 32, 211–229. [Google Scholar]
  36. Dreyfus, G. Blockchain for optimizing resource allocation in education. Educ. Resource Innov. J. 2024, 18, 55–69. [Google Scholar]
  37. Alammary, A.; Alhazmi, S.; Almasri, M. Promoting blockchain adoption in Bahrain’s universities. Middle East Educ. Pol. Rev. 2019, 20, 245–259. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram illustrating the study selection process. The diagram shows the number of records identified, screened, excluded, and the final number of studies included in the systematic review.
Figure 1. PRISMA Flow Diagram illustrating the study selection process. The diagram shows the number of records identified, screened, excluded, and the final number of studies included in the systematic review.
Applsci 15 02404 g001
Table 1. A structured comparison of key studies, categorized by relevance to the GCC, global implementations, proposed solutions, and recommendations for GCC adoption of blockchain technology in education.
Table 1. A structured comparison of key studies, categorized by relevance to the GCC, global implementations, proposed solutions, and recommendations for GCC adoption of blockchain technology in education.
Author(s) and YearGCC RelevanceGlobal ImplementationsProposed SolutionsRecommendations for GCC
Cheriguene et al. [1]Credential verificationBlockchain in AlgeriaDecentralized credentialingCentralized blockchain for GCC
Haque et al. [2]Secure educational dataEducation 4.0 blockchainSmart contracts for dataInvest in smart contract pilots
Zhao et al. [3]Qualification verificationDigital authentication in ChinaBlockchain ledgerImplement blockchain repositories
Table 2. Summary of articles “Blockchain Technology in Education”.
Table 2. Summary of articles “Blockchain Technology in Education”.
S/NAuthor(s) and YearRelevance to GCC ContextGlobal ImplementationsSolutions ProposedRecommendations
1Cheriguene et al. [1]Highlights inefficiencies in credential verification and transparency in Bahrain’s educational system.Discusses blockchain-based credential verification systems used during pandemics in Algeria.Proposes a blockchain-based framework for secure and tamper-proof credential management.Develop a centralized blockchain for the GCC to standardize credential verification.
2Haque et al. [2]Addresses the challenge of managing educational data securely across institutions in the GCC.Explores education 4.0 initiatives leveraging blockchain for secure data-sharing and learning record tracking.Suggests smart contracts to automate inter-institutional data-sharing and credential validation.Invest in regional pilot programs for smart-contract-based academic records management.
3Zhao et al. [3]Emphasizes the need for transparency in qualification verification across GCC institutions.Demonstrates blockchain for digital education authentication in China’s e-learning platforms.Develops a decentralized ledger for secure digital education transactions and transparency.Implement blockchain for centralized educational data repositories across Bahrain’s universities.
4Rani et al. [4]Identifies gaps in administrative efficiency and secure credentialing systems in GCC educational institutions.Reviews blockchain use in various educational systems globally, including the USA and Europe.Recommends the use of blockchain-based e-transcript systems for interoperability and traceability.Establish policy frameworks to integrate blockchain into Bahrain’s academic infrastructure.
5Savelyeva and Park [5]Highlights challenges in equitable access to quality education and credential management in Bahrain.Discusses blockchain’s potential for sustainable education in marginalized communities globally.Proposes blockchain-supported educational commons for equitable access to shared learning resources.Collaborate regionally to create blockchain-powered shared educational resource platforms for the GCC.
6Wei and Dai [6]Identifies issues with administrative fragmentation in GCC institutions.Explores the application of blockchain in Europe to enhance academic administrative processes.Suggests using blockchain for automating and securing administrative workflows.Deploy pilot blockchain systems in Bahrain’s institutions to test automation of key administrative tasks.
7Alammary et al. [7]Explores barriers to technology adoption in GCC educational systems.Examines blockchain for digital diplomas and certifications in Europe and North America.Advocates for blockchain’s immutability to enhance credential authentication.Increase awareness and training for blockchain use in educational institutions.
8Kataev et al. [8]Identifies trust issues in academic records management in GCC institutions.Analyzes successful blockchain implementations in Russia’s higher education systems.Proposes blockchain-powered academic records and e-transcript systems.Integrate blockchain with national databases for higher education across Bahrain.
9Dreyfus [9]Discusses the slow adoption of blockchain in GCC educational environments.Highlights blockchain use for educational supply chain management in the USA.Suggests supply chain frameworks to enhance resource allocation in education.Develop partnerships between academic institutions and private blockchain providers in Bahrain.
10Muslam et al. (2024) [10]Limited interoperability in educational data systemsBlockchain frameworks for managing e-learning data in IraqIntegrating blockchain with learning management systems for secure data exchangeInvest in blockchain-enabled learning management systems in Bahrain’s schools and universities.
11Savelyeva et al. (2023) [11]Sustainability challenges in Bahrain’s education sectorBlockchain’s potential for UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)Blockchain-powered ecosystems for sustainable education practicesAlign blockchain implementations with Bahrain’s Vision 2030 educational goals.
12Park and Yeung (2022) [12]Transparency in academic credentialingBlockchain-based credential solutions in Hong Kong and SingaporeBlockchain for tamper-proof credentialsStandardize blockchain credentialing systems across Bahrain and the GCC.
13Alammary et al. (2019) [13]Barriers to technology adoptionBlockchain for digital diplomas in Europe and North AmericaBlockchain immutability for credential authenticationIncrease awareness and training for blockchain use in educational institutions.
14Zhao et al. (2020) [14]Decentralization for fragmented educational systemsBlockchain for student assessments in Chinese universitiesDecentralized assessment systemsPilot decentralized assessment platforms in Bahrain’s higher education institutions.
15Wei et al. (2021) [15]Scalability challenges in blockchain adoptionBlockchain for credential sharing in South KoreaEnhancing blockchain scalability for credential verificationDevelop a scalable blockchain solution tailored to Bahrain’s growing education sector.
16Kumar et al. (2023) [16]Educational data-sharing and interoperability challengesBlockchain for inter-university collaboration in EuropeBlockchain-powered interoperability frameworksEstablish inter-university blockchain networks within the GCC to enhance collaboration and data security.
17Dreyfus et al. (2024) [17]Slow blockchain adoption in higher educationBlockchain for educational supply chains in the USABlockchain-based resource allocationStrengthen public–private partnerships to accelerate blockchain adoption in Bahrain’s education sector.
18Haque et al. (2023) [18]Cybersecurity challenges in Bahrain’s education sectorBlockchain for securing student data globallyBlockchain-based cybersecurity protocolsImplement robust cybersecurity frameworks integrated with blockchain across Bahrain’s educational institutions.
19Muslam et al. (2024) [19]Limited interoperability in educational data systemsBlockchain for e-learning data management in IraqIntegrating blockchain with learning management systemsInvest in blockchain-enabled learning management systems in Bahrain’s schools and universities.
20Goyal et al. (2023) [20]Resource allocation inefficiencies in GCC educationBlockchain for efficient resource allocation in Indian universitiesSmart contract-based resource allocationPilot blockchain-based resource management systems in Bahrain’s Ministry of Education for equitable funding.
21Zhao et al. (2020) [21]Blockchain for transparency in education assessmentsDigital authentication for education in ChinaTamper-proof digital assessment systemDevelop blockchain-enabled grading systems to ensure transparency in Bahrain’s academic institutions.
22Savelyeva and Park (2022) [22]Education access inequities in BahrainBlockchain for sustainable education practicesDecentralized systems for equitable resource accessIntegrate blockchain to bridge educational gaps in marginalized communities within the GCC.
23Wei et al. (2023) [23]Administrative inefficiencies in higher educationBlockchain for student records and administrative tasks in EuropeAutomating administrative workflows using blockchainPilot blockchain-based administration systems in Bahrain’s universities to reduce inefficiencies.
24Muslam et al. (2024) [24]Interoperability challenges in GCC educational institutionsBlockchain for e-learning systems in IraqBlockchain-powered interoperability solutionsImplement blockchain to standardize data-sharing protocols in Bahrain’s educational institutions.
25Haque et al. (2023) [25]Data security challenges in Bahrain’s education sectorBlockchain for secure academic data storage and sharing globallyBlockchain-based data security frameworksEstablish robust blockchain-based cybersecurity measures to safeguard student data in Bahrain.
26Alammary et al. (2019) [26]Barriers to blockchain adoption in GCC educationBlockchain credential verification systems in the USA and CanadaEducation and training initiatives for blockchain adoptionOrganize awareness campaigns and training programs to promote blockchain adoption in Bahrain’s education sector.
27Wei and Dai (2024) [27]Fragmented administrative processes in GCC institutionsBlockchain for resource management in European universitiesConsolidating administrative systems with blockchainInvest in blockchain-based platforms for integrated resource management in Bahrain’s higher education sector.
28Dreyfus (2024) [28]Slow blockchain implementation in GCC educationBlockchain for managing educational supply chains in North AmericaBlockchain frameworks for optimizing resource allocationFoster partnerships with private blockchain providers to accelerate adoption in Bahrain’s education sector.
29Goyal et al. (2023) [29]Transparency in credential verification in GCCBlockchain digital credentialing systems in IndiaDecentralized credentialing platformStandardize blockchain credentialing systems across Bahrain’s educational institutions.
30Park and Yeung (2022) [30]Limited transparency in GCC qualification processesBlockchain for credential management in Asian universitiesTamper-proof blockchain-based credentialingEstablish national standards for blockchain-based academic credentials in Bahrain.
31Zhao et al. (2020) [31]Discusses the potential for blockchain to improve transparency in GCC education assessment practices.Highlights blockchain’s role in student evaluation systems in China.Suggests decentralized evaluation frameworks using blockchain for increased fairness and reliability.Deploy blockchain-enabled assessment systems in Bahrain’s academic institutions to enhance transparency.
32Savelyeva and Park (2023) [32]Highlights sustainability and equity challenges in Bahrain’s education sector.Explores blockchain’s role in creating sustainable educational environments globally.Proposes blockchain-based systems to promote equitable access to education resources.Develop decentralized learning platforms in Bahrain to enhance inclusivity and equity.
33Haque et al. (2023) [33]Examines cybersecurity gaps in GCC educational institutions.Discusses global blockchain applications for secure academic data management.Recommends blockchain to safeguard student records and institutional data from cyber threats.Establish robust cybersecurity measures integrating blockchain across Bahrain’s educational systems.
34Rani et al. (2024) [34]Identifies administrative inefficiencies and credentialing challenges in GCC universities.Explores blockchain’s use in automating credential validation systems in Europe and North America.Proposes smart contract-enabled credentialing systems to ensure accuracy and authenticity.Pilot blockchain credentialing frameworks across Bahrain’s educational institutions for streamlined processes.
35Wei and Dai (2024) [35]Discusses the need for scalability in blockchain solutions for GCC education.Highlights blockchain’s application for scalable credentialing in European education systems.Suggests scalability enhancements to handle increasing data volumes in blockchain credential systems.Implement scalable blockchain solutions tailored for Bahrain’s expanding education sector.
36Dreyfus (2024) [36]Explores resource allocation inefficiencies in GCC educational systems.Examines blockchain frameworks for resource optimization in North America’s educational institutions.Recommends blockchain-based frameworks for equitable resource allocation.Collaborate with private-sector providers to implement blockchain for education funding allocation in Bahrain.
37Alammary et al. (2019) [37]Identifies barriers to blockchain adoption in GCC academic settings.Discusses blockchain adoption strategies for credential verification in North American universities.Proposes structured awareness programs to encourage blockchain adoption.Launch educational workshops and seminars to promote blockchain technology adoption in Bahrain’s universities.
Table 3. A comparison of global blockchain implementations and GCC-specific challenges in credential verification, academic record sharing, and resource management.
Table 3. A comparison of global blockchain implementations and GCC-specific challenges in credential verification, academic record sharing, and resource management.
CriteriaGlobal ImplementationsGCC-Specific Challenges
Credential verificationBlockchain used in MIT and IBMRegulatory constraints in GCC
Academic record sharingEurope’s EBSI frameworkLack of regional interoperability
Resource managementIndia’s blockchain-based fundingLimited blockchain awareness in education
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Al-Samarai, B.; Morato, J. A Systematic Literature Review for the Topic of Blockchain Technology and Educational Systems in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 2404. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052404

AMA Style

Al-Samarai B, Morato J. A Systematic Literature Review for the Topic of Blockchain Technology and Educational Systems in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(5):2404. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052404

Chicago/Turabian Style

Al-Samarai, Baraa, and Jorge Morato. 2025. "A Systematic Literature Review for the Topic of Blockchain Technology and Educational Systems in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)" Applied Sciences 15, no. 5: 2404. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052404

APA Style

Al-Samarai, B., & Morato, J. (2025). A Systematic Literature Review for the Topic of Blockchain Technology and Educational Systems in the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC). Applied Sciences, 15(5), 2404. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15052404

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop