Does Mental Imagery Influence Muscles Activity? A Proof of Concept Study on Franklin Method® Effectiveness in Dance Training
Abstract
:Featured Application
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Participant
2.2. Study Design and Procedures
- Standing in a parallel position for 10 s. A parallel position involved an upright standing position with the feet located parallel and medial borders of the feet adhered to each other (Figure 1). The task was carried out in classical technique (no imagery) and with mental imagery called foot dome, according to the Franklin Method® [7] (p. 247). In this imagery, the study subject visualized a waterspout spraying upward from between the ankles [7] (p. 247).
- Demi pointe relevé in the parallel position (Figure 1). The task was divided into three phases: (1) lifting the heel from parallel position into demi pointe relevé (3 s); (2) standing in demi pointe relevé (5 s); (3) lowering the heel from demi pointe relevé into parallel position (3 s). The task was conducted in classical technique (no imagery) and with mental imagery called the wheelbarrow, according to the Franklin Method® [7] (p. 115). In this imagery, the study subject visualized that: (1) his foot turned into a wheelbarrow as he lifted his heel off the ground; (2) the toes push against the floor as the weight of the body is lifted upward [7] (p. 115).
- Demi plié in first classical ballet position (Figure 2). The task was divided into two phases: (1) bending the knees from first position into demi plié (4 s), and (2) straightening the knees from the demi plié into first position (4 s). The task was carried out in the classical technique (no imagery) and with two mental imageries called (1) the kneecap float, and (2) space behind the kneecap [7] (p. 119). In this imagery, the study subject respectively visualized: (1) the kneecap floating perpendicularly away from the femur as he extended the knee; and (2) the space behind the kneecap increasing, creating a little cushion of space for the kneecap to glide on [7] (p. 119).
2.3. Electromyography
2.4. Data Analysis
3. Results
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Pavlik, K.; Nordin-Bates, S. Imagery in dance. A literature review. J. Danc. Med. Sci. 2016, 20, 51–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Afremow, J.; Overby, L.; Vadocz, E. Using mental imagery to enhance sport and dance skills of children. J. Int. Counc. Health Phys. Educ. Recreat. Sport Danc. 1997, 33, 44–48. [Google Scholar]
- Krasnow, D.H.; Chatfield, S.J.; Barr, S.; Jensen, J.L.; Dufek, J.S. Imagery and conditioning practices for dancers. Danc. Res. J. 1997, 29, 43–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nordin, S.M.; Cumming, J. Measuring the content of dancers’ images: Development of the Dance Imagery Questionnaire (DIQ). J. Danc. Med. Sci. 2006, 10, 85–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bolles, G.; Chatfield, S.J. The intersection of imagery ability, imagery use, and learning style. J. Danc. Educ. 2009, 9, 6–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sacha, T.J.; Russ, S.W. Effects of pretend imagery on learning dance in preschool children. Early Child. Educ. J. 2006, 33, 341–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Franklin, E. Dynamic Alignment Through Imagery, 2nd ed.; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
- Franklin, E. Dance Imagery for Technique and Performance; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Available online: https://franklinmethod.com/ (accessed on 29 January 2025).
- Hanrahan, C.; Vergeer, I. Multiple uses of mental imagery by professional modern dancers. Imagin. Cogn. Personal. 2001, 20, 231–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krasnow, D.; Wilmerding, M.V.; Stecyk, S.; Wyon, M.; Koutedakis, Y. Biomechanical research in dance: A literature review. Med. Probl. Perform. Artist. 2011, 26, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abraham, A.; Dunsky, A.; Dickstein, R. The effect of motor imagery practice on Elevé performance in adolescent female dance students: A randomized controlled trial. J. Imag. Res. Sport Phys. Act. 2017, 12, 20160006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gildea, J.E.; VAN DEN Hoorn, W.; Hides, J.A.; Hodges, P.W. Trunk dynamics are impaired in ballet dancers with back pain but improve with imagery. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2015, 47, 1665–1671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heiland, T.; Rovetti, R. Examining effects of Franklin Method metaphorical and anatomical mental images on college dancers’ jumping height. Res. Danc. Educ. 2012, 14, 141–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Couillandre, A.; Lewton-Brain, P.; Portero, P. Exploring the effects of kinesiological awareness and mental imagery on movement intention in the performance of demi-plié. J. Danc. Med. Sci. 2008, 12, s91–s98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hermens, H.J.; Freriks, B.; Disselhorst-Klug, C.; Rau, G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. 2000, 10, 361–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Franklin, E. Dynamic Alignment Through Imagery; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 1996. [Google Scholar]
- Franklin, E. Conditioning for Dance; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Gorwa, J.; Kabaciński, J.; Murawa, M.; Fryzowicz, A. On the track of the ideal turnout: Electromyographic and kinematic analysis of the five classical ballet positions. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0230654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Parallel | Relevé (1st, 2nd, and 3rd Phases) | Plié (2nd Phase) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Examined muscle | Foot dome | Pushing the toes | The wheelbarrow | The kneecap float | Space behind the kneecap |
Rectus abdominis | Increased | No | No | No | Increased (right) |
Erector spinae | Increased | Increased (left) | No | Increased (left) | Increased |
Vastus medialis | Increased | Increased | Increased | No | No |
Biceps femoris | No | Increased (left in 2nd, 3rd phases) | No | No | No |
Gastrocnemius | Increased | Increased (except for left, 1st phase) | Increased | Increased (right) | Increased (right) |
Tibialis anterior | Increased | Increased (right in 2nd, 3rd phases) | Increased (except for right, 1st phase) | No | Increased |
Fibularis longus | Increased | Increased (both sides in 3rd phase; right in 1st phase) | Increased (except for left, 3rd phase | Increased (left) | No |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Gorwa, J.; Fryzowicz, A. Does Mental Imagery Influence Muscles Activity? A Proof of Concept Study on Franklin Method® Effectiveness in Dance Training. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 1902. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041902
Gorwa J, Fryzowicz A. Does Mental Imagery Influence Muscles Activity? A Proof of Concept Study on Franklin Method® Effectiveness in Dance Training. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(4):1902. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041902
Chicago/Turabian StyleGorwa, Joanna, and Anna Fryzowicz. 2025. "Does Mental Imagery Influence Muscles Activity? A Proof of Concept Study on Franklin Method® Effectiveness in Dance Training" Applied Sciences 15, no. 4: 1902. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041902
APA StyleGorwa, J., & Fryzowicz, A. (2025). Does Mental Imagery Influence Muscles Activity? A Proof of Concept Study on Franklin Method® Effectiveness in Dance Training. Applied Sciences, 15(4), 1902. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15041902