Next Article in Journal
Load-Sensitive Tire–Road Friction Modeling and Dynamic Stability Analysis of Multi-Axle Trucks
Previous Article in Journal
A Review of Alfalfa Drying Technology and Equipment Throughout the Whole Process
Previous Article in Special Issue
BIONIB: Blockchain-Based IoT Using Novelty Index in Bridge Health Monitoring
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Monitoring and Control of Structural Vibrations

Maurer Switzerland GmbH, Grossplatzstrasse 24, 8118 Pfaffhausen, Switzerland
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(22), 12267; https://doi.org/10.3390/app152212267
Submission received: 3 November 2025 / Accepted: 15 November 2025 / Published: 19 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vibration Monitoring and Control of the Built Environment)
Monitoring and control of structural vibrations are crucial to ensure structural safety and vibration comfort of civil engineering structures, such as buildings, bridges, tunnels, antennas, stadia etc. [1,2]. Structures may vibrate due to earthquakes [3], wind [4], traffic [5], and pedestrians [6]. The associated loading models are needed to accurately describe the impacts of the different excitation mechanisms on the dynamics of civil structures. The resulting structural vibrations are often measured using accelerometers, as these sensors do not require a reference point, unlike, for example, displacement transducers. However, modern monitoring systems are enriched by displacement transducers, velocity sensors (geophones), strain gauges, etc., to directly measure the states of interest [7]. The classical approach is to wire the sensors with the data recorder and to activate the acquisition of the raw or slightly lowpass filtered data based on trigger levels. Another approach is to use the sensors as so-called nodes, where some of the post-processing is conducted, and the states of interest, rather than the raw data, are wirelessly sent from node to node and eventually to the data recorder to avoid wiring [8]. These sensor networks may be preferable when wiring is difficult and the states of interest are clear. The wiring of sensors should occur when the full information of the sensor signals is of interest. In a subsequent step, the analysis of the measurement data in terms of amplitudes and frequencies or model updating techniques to identify structural parameters may be used for the model-based design of structural dampers, isolators, and vibration compensators, as well as for structural health monitoring [9,10]. This complements the further development of hydraulic and steel hysteretic dampers, curved surface sliders and lead rubber bearings, and tuned mass dampers [11,12]. These vibration dampers, isolators, and compensators can be passive, semi-active, or active, of which, the semi-active solutions combine the advantages of enhancing the resulting vibration reduction and requiring less power [13]. In the fields of measurement data analysis and structural health monitoring, the goal is to derive a digital twin of the structure to predict or estimate fatigue and damage [14].
This Special Issue presents current research in these fields. Structural vibration monitoring is addressed by Gadiraju et al., who describe a holistic modular structural health monitoring system for bridges. Amarantidou et al. investigate the strengthening of existing masonry structures against seismic excitation, considering soil–structure interaction, which is a realistic situation for many existing buildings. The research of Kodakkal et al. focuses on the question of how the modelling approach of tall buildings under wind excitation influences the prediction of the resulting storey accelerations, which is crucial for deciding whether a tuned mass damper is needed. In the contribution of Hogsberg, the tuning and efficacy of a tuned mass damper with an inerter is discussed, to better understand the impact of the inerter on the dynamics of the damper. Wang et al. analyse the loading of long-span bridges due to congested traffic using a probabilistic modelling approach, to take into consideration the random nature of this type of excitation. The semi-active tuned mass damper based on a real-time controlled semi-active damper, presented by Maslanka, is a further development of the semi-active tuned mass dampers of the Volgograd Bridge and represents the optimum solution of this semi-active control approach.
This Special Issue is enriched by two review articles. Dharmajan and Al Hamaydeh review the behaviour of steel–concrete composite structures under seismic loading conditions, and Katsimpini et al. provide a general overview of the state of art of structural control systems and identify gaps for future research.
After approximately two years, the Special Issue on “Vibration Monitoring and Control of the Built Environment” is now closed. It contributes to the documentation of recent advances in the fields of vibration monitoring and control and may motivate further research and development.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank the authors, peer reviewers, and staff of MDPI for their valuable contributions to this Special Issue.

Conflicts of Interest

Author Felix Weber was employed by the company Maurer Switzerland GmbH.

List of Contributions

  • Gadiraju, D.S.; McMaster, R.; Eftekhar Azam, S.; Khazanchi, D. BIONIB: Blockchain-Based IoT Using Novelty Index in Bridge Health Monitoring. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 10542. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910542.
  • Amarantidou, K.G.; Katsimpini, P.S.; Papagiannopoulos, G.; Hatzigeorgiou, G. Seismic Assessment and Strengthening of a Load-Bearing Masonry Structure Considering SSI Effects. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 8135. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158135.
  • Kodakkal, A.; Péntek, M.; Bletzinger, K.-U.; Wüchner, R.; Weber, F. Systematic and Quantitative Assessment of Reduced Model Resolution on the Transient Structural Response Under Wind Load. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 1588. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15031588.
  • Hogsberg, J. Tuning of a Viscous Inerter Damper: How to Achieve Resonant Damping without a Damper Resonance. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 676. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15020676.
  • Wang, X.; Ruan, X.; Casas, J.R.; Zhang, M. Probabilistic Modeling of Congested Traffic Scenarios on Long-Span Bridges. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9525. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14209525.
  • Maslanka, M. Calibration of Viscous Damping–Stiffness Control Force in Active and Semi-Active Tuned Mass Dampers for Reduction of Harmonic Vibrations. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 11645. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132111645.
  • Dharmajan, N.B.; Al Hamaydeh, M. State-of-the-Art Review of Structural Vibration Control: Overview and Research Gaps. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 7966. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15147966.
  • Katsimpini, P.; Papagiannopoulos, G.; Hatzigeorgiou, G. An In-Depth Analysis of the Seismic Performance Characteristics of Steel–Concrete Composite Structures. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 3715. https:// doi.org/10.3390/app15073715.

References

  1. Farrar, C.R.; Dervilis, N.; Worden, K. The Past, Present and Future of Structural HealthMonitoring: An Overview of Three Ages. Strain 2025, 61, e12495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Saaed, T.E.; Nikolakopoulos, G.; Jonasson, J.E.; Hedlund, H. A state-of-the-art review of structural control systems. J. Vib. Control 2013, 21, 919–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hu, Y.; Khatiwada, P.; Tsang, H.-H.; Menegon, S. Site-Specific Response Spectra and Accelerograms on Bedrock and Soil Surface. CivilEng 2023, 4, 311–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Péntek, M.; Riedl, A.; Bletzinger, K.-U.; Weber, F. Investigating the Vibration Mitigation Efficiency of Tuned Sloshing Dampers Using a Two-Fluid CFD Approach. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 7033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xu, M.; Zhou, X.Y.; Shen, J.; Ding, D.; Cao, S.; Cai, C.S. Performance evaluation of extreme value prediction methods for bridge traffic load effects. Adv. Bridge Eng. 2025, 6, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Yu, E.; Xu, G.; Wang, J.; Li, Y. A non-contact pedestrian load analysis and prediction model based on intelligent image recognition technology. Measurement 2025, 256, 118238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mardanshahi, A.; Sreekumar, A.; Yang, X.; Barman, S.K.; Chronopoulos, D. Sensing Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring: A State-of-the-Art Review on Performance Criteria and New-Generation Technologies. Sensors 2025, 25, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Herglotz, C.; Jabłoński, I.; Karnapke, R.; Shahin, K.; Reichenbach, M. Designing Intelligent Sensor Networks: A Comprehensive Survey of Sensing, Edge AI, and 5G+/6G Connectivity. IEEE Access 2025, 13, 172306–172325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, B.; Ren, Y.; He, S.; Gao, Z.; Li, B.; Song, J. A review of methods and applications in structural health monitoring (SHM) for bridges. Measurement 2025, 245, 116575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Weber, F.; Meier, L.; Distl, J.; Braun, C. Optimum design of curved surface sliders based on site-specific seismic input and its sensitivity. Geosciences 2018, 8, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Katsimpini, P.; Papagiannopoulos, G.; Hatzigeorgiou, G. A Thorough Examination of Innovative Supplementary Dampers Aimed at Enhancing the Seismic Behavior of Structural Systems. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Weber, F.; Distl, J.; Meier, L.; Braun, C. Curved surface sliders with friction damping, linear viscous damping, bow tie friction damping and semi-actively controlled properties. Struct. Control Health Monit. 2018, 25, e2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Weber, F.; Spensberger, S.; Obholzer, F.; Distl, J.; Braun, C. Semi-Active Cable Damping to Compensate for Damping Losses Due to Reduced Cable Motion Close to Cable Anchor. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 1909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sun, Z.; Jayasinghe, S.; Sidiq, A.; Shahrivar, F.; Mahmoodian, M.; Setunge, S. Approach Towards the Development of Digital Twin for Structural Health Monitoring of Civil Infrastructure: A Comprehensive Review. Sensors 2024, 25, 59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Weber, F. Monitoring and Control of Structural Vibrations. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 12267. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152212267

AMA Style

Weber F. Monitoring and Control of Structural Vibrations. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(22):12267. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152212267

Chicago/Turabian Style

Weber, Felix. 2025. "Monitoring and Control of Structural Vibrations" Applied Sciences 15, no. 22: 12267. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152212267

APA Style

Weber, F. (2025). Monitoring and Control of Structural Vibrations. Applied Sciences, 15(22), 12267. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152212267

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop