Next Article in Journal
The Moisture Effect on Ultrasonic, Rebound Hardness and Drilling Resistance Data in Non-Destructive Testing of Concrete
Previous Article in Journal
Speech Recognition-Based Analysis of Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) Communications for Estimating Advisory Timing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Leveraging Feature Extraction to Perform Time-Efficient Selection for Machine Learning Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Calibration of a Multiphase Poroelasticity Model Using Genetic Algorithms

by
Monika Bartlewska-Urban
* and
Irena Bagińska
*
Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(22), 11972; https://doi.org/10.3390/app152211972
Submission received: 5 October 2025 / Revised: 20 October 2025 / Accepted: 4 November 2025 / Published: 11 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Machine Learning and Soft Computing: Current Trends and Applications)

Abstract

Clibration of constitutive models is a critical step in geotechnical design, ensuring that numerical predictions accurately reproduce observed behavior. This study explores the use of Genetic Algorithms (GAs) for the calibration of Biot’s poroelastic model based on oedometer test data. A two-stage calibration procedure was applied. In Stage 1, when five parameters were varied simultaneously, the results showed strong parameter intercorrelation and structural non-identifiability, as different parameter sets produced nearly identical objective function values. To address this limitation, an identifiability analysis was performed, leading to parameter reduction. In Stage 2, only A, R, and k were calibrated, with N and H fixed, which resulted in stable and interpretable solutions. The GA-based approach demonstrated convergence, the absence of local minima, and good agreement with experimental data. The study highlights both the potential and the current limitations of GA-based calibration and should be regarded as a proof-of-concept rather than a complete identifiability study.
Keywords: genetic algorithms; Biot model; poroelasticity; parameter identification genetic algorithms; Biot model; poroelasticity; parameter identification

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bartlewska-Urban, M.; Bagińska, I. Calibration of a Multiphase Poroelasticity Model Using Genetic Algorithms. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 11972. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152211972

AMA Style

Bartlewska-Urban M, Bagińska I. Calibration of a Multiphase Poroelasticity Model Using Genetic Algorithms. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(22):11972. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152211972

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bartlewska-Urban, Monika, and Irena Bagińska. 2025. "Calibration of a Multiphase Poroelasticity Model Using Genetic Algorithms" Applied Sciences 15, no. 22: 11972. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152211972

APA Style

Bartlewska-Urban, M., & Bagińska, I. (2025). Calibration of a Multiphase Poroelasticity Model Using Genetic Algorithms. Applied Sciences, 15(22), 11972. https://doi.org/10.3390/app152211972

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop