This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Open AccessReview
Site and Formation Selection for CO2 Geological Sequestration: Research Progress and Case Analyses
by
Wei Lian
Wei Lian 1,*,
Hangyu Liu
Hangyu Liu 1,
Jun Li
Jun Li 1,2 and
Yanxian Wu
Yanxian Wu 3
1
School of Petroleum, China University of Petroleum-Beijing at Karamay, Karamay 834000, China
2
Hainan Institute, China University of Petroleum (Beijing), Sanya 572024, China
3
Oil Extraction Technology Research Institute, Xinjiang Oilfield Company, Karamay 834000, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(21), 11402; https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111402 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 24 September 2025
/
Revised: 22 October 2025
/
Accepted: 22 October 2025
/
Published: 24 October 2025
Abstract
Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) is a key technology for achieving carbon neutrality goals. Relevant foreign research began in the 1970s, but overall it remains in the exploration and demonstration stage. Clarifying the geological parameters and characteristics of reservoir–caprock systems in CCS projects is of great significance to the effectiveness and safety of long-term storage. By reviewing 15 typical global CCS projects, this paper identifies that ideal reservoirs are gently structured sandstones with few faults (characterized by high porosity, high permeability, and large scale, which are conducive to CO2 diffusion) or basalts (which can react with CO2 for mineralization, enabling permanent storage). Caprocks are mainly composed of thick mudstone and shale; composite caprocks consisting of multi-layer low-permeability formations and tight interlayers within reservoirs have stronger sealing performance. Additionally, they should be far from faults, and sufficient caprock thickness is required to reduce leakage risks. Meanwhile, this paper points out the challenges faced by CCS technology, such as complex site selection, limitations in long-term monitoring, difficulties in designing injection parameters, and challenges in large-scale deployment. It proposes suggestions including establishing a quantitative site selection system, building a comprehensive monitoring network, and strengthening collaborative optimization of parameters, so as to provide a basis for safe site selection and assessment.
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Lian, W.; Liu, H.; Li, J.; Wu, Y.
Site and Formation Selection for CO2 Geological Sequestration: Research Progress and Case Analyses. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 11402.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111402
AMA Style
Lian W, Liu H, Li J, Wu Y.
Site and Formation Selection for CO2 Geological Sequestration: Research Progress and Case Analyses. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(21):11402.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111402
Chicago/Turabian Style
Lian, Wei, Hangyu Liu, Jun Li, and Yanxian Wu.
2025. "Site and Formation Selection for CO2 Geological Sequestration: Research Progress and Case Analyses" Applied Sciences 15, no. 21: 11402.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111402
APA Style
Lian, W., Liu, H., Li, J., & Wu, Y.
(2025). Site and Formation Selection for CO2 Geological Sequestration: Research Progress and Case Analyses. Applied Sciences, 15(21), 11402.
https://doi.org/10.3390/app152111402
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details
here.
Article Metrics
Article Access Statistics
For more information on the journal statistics, click
here.
Multiple requests from the same IP address are counted as one view.