Next Article in Journal
Interval Type-II Fuzzy Broad Model Predictive Control Based on the Static and Dynamic Hybrid Event-Triggering Mechanism and Adaptive Compensation for Furnace Temperature in the MSWI Process
Previous Article in Journal
Research and Application of a Cross-Gradient Constrained Time-Lapse Inversion Method for Direct Current Resistivity Monitoring
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Three-Dimensional Simulation-Based Comparison of Streamer Initiation in SF6/N2 and SF6/CO2 for Different Mixing Ratios and Pressures

1
Department of Electrical Power Engineering, U.S.-Pakistan Center for Advanced Studies (USPCAS-E), National University of Sciences and Technology (NUST), Islamabad 44000, Pakistan
2
Department of Electrical and Photonics Engineering, Technical University of Denmark (DTU), 2800 Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
3
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Swiss Plasma Center (SPC), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
4
School of Electrical Engineering and Automation, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, China
5
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian 116026, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(19), 10331; https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910331
Submission received: 6 August 2025 / Revised: 12 September 2025 / Accepted: 19 September 2025 / Published: 23 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Plasma–Surface Interaction: Theory, Simulation and Application)

Abstract

Being a greenhouse gas, SF6 has significant potential to cause global warming. No alternative gas has been found so far that meets the required criteria. Ongoing research has narrowed down the candidates to some relatively environmentally friendly elementary gases such as N2, CO2, and their mixtures with a small percentage of SF6 (10–20%). Streamers are important and play a deterministic role in the breakdown phenomenon. The inception and growth of streamer discharge depend on the generation of free electrons. Various ionization sources, including field ionization, Auger release of electrons, photoionization, and electron detachment from negative ions, have been employed in dielectric media. In this work, field ionization is considered a free-electron generation mechanism for streamer initiation. In field ionization, neutral molecules produce free electrons when extremely high electric fields are present near the needle electrode. A 3D particle model with field ionization is then used to investigate positive streamer initiation in SF6/N2 and SF6/CO2 for different mixing ratios at 1 and 5 bar. It was observed that for both mixtures, the number and the apparent length of streamer branching decreased with increasing SF6 concentration and were minimal at 100% SF6. The number of branches and the apparent length of streamers were higher in the case of SF6/CO2 compared with SF6/N2 mixtures, indicating a higher ionization rate for the SF6/CO2 mixture. With increasing pressure, the branching and length of the streamers for both mixtures decreased significantly. Although the field-ionization model is only suitable for very high electric fields in the vicinity of the needle tip, its validity is still questionable for uniform fields and at lower pressures.

1. Introduction

Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) is widely used as an insulating material and arc-quenching medium in gas-insulated switchgear (GIS) and high-voltage circuit breakers (CBs) because of its high dielectric strength and excellent heat-transfer capability [1]. Although SF6 has excellent insulating properties, it is also a powerful greenhouse gas with a high global-warming potential. Significant efforts have been made to reduce SF6 emissions by introducing state-of-the-art SF6-handling techniques [2]. In parallel, the quest for SF6 alternatives has been ongoing for more than two decades. SF6 alternatives should have minimal or no global-warming potential, high dielectric strength, good arc-quenching capabilities, and chemical stability to meet the insulating-medium requirements of gas-insulated equipment. Possible candidates that have the above-mentioned characteristics have been narrowed down to buffer gases such as N2, air, CO2, rare gases, and their mixtures.
Nitrogen (N2) is an inert and easily available gas and is considered one of the most important additives to SF6. A small amount of SF6 added to N2 can increase the overall breakdown strength. The SF6/N2 mixture as a replacement for SF6 has been more widely adopted in practical applications [3]. However, in non-uniform fields, SF6/CO2 has higher dielectric strength and better insulation characteristics than SF6/N2, especially in gas-insulated transformers (GITs) because of gas/film insulation [4]. CO2 has attracted attention as a promising substitute for SF6 in high-voltage circuit breakers because it has acceptable insulation and interrupting properties [5,6,7]. CO2 is also an important component of fluoronitriles/CO2 gas mixtures and is a promising alternative to SF6 in medium- and high-voltage switchgear [8,9].
Surface roughness or particle contamination generates high-field zones in gas-insulated switchgear. SF6 is susceptible to these high-field zones, and breakdown may occur. For reliable and continuous GIS operation, it is necessary to investigate non-uniform field breakdown in SF6 and its mixtures [10]. A considerable amount of work has been carried out on the pre-breakdown and breakdown characteristics of SF6 and its mixtures in uniform and non-uniform field conditions under different applied conditions [11]. At low pressure and for small gaps (≤0.3 cm), breakdown in gaseous dielectric media occurs via streamers. Streamers are important, and their initiation, branching, and propagation play crucial roles in the breakdown process [12].
Both experimental and numerical simulation approaches have been adopted to understand the dynamics of streamer discharge, but experimental approaches have some limitations in studying the microscopic characteristics of streamer discharge. Simulation is the best solution for understanding the physical mechanism responsible for the initiation, propagation, and branching of streamer discharge based on electron-beam data. Due to the stochastic nature of streamer discharge, 3D simulations may be needed. Generally, two kinds of simulation techniques are adopted for streamer discharge investigation: (1) fluid schemes and (2) particle schemes, or their combinations. Each approach is used to clarify the discharge mechanisms in SF6 and its mixtures. Both 1D and 2D fluid models for streamer discharge in SF6 in uniform and non-uniform field conditions with different applied conditions have been used to examine electrons and electric-field distribution [13,14]. The particle simulation technique was adopted to model positive and negative streamer discharge in SF6 [15]. A 3D particle-in-cell model was used to study streamer formation in electronegative gases under uniform field conditions [16]. In [17], a particle model with a 3D Poisson solver was built to study the avalanche-to-streamer transition in arbitrary gases. Streamer discharge development in an SF6/N2 mixture was studied using 1D and 2D axially symmetric fluid models [18,19]. The branching phenomenon of negative streamers in CO2 at atmospheric pressure was studied using fluid and particle models without considering any discharge initiation mechanism [20].
The generation of free electrons is a prerequisite for streamer discharge initiation. Different mechanisms, such as photoionization, detachment of electrons from negative ions, hole emission, Auger release of free electrons, field emission, and field ionization, depend on the medium state, applied voltage, and electric-field distribution [21]. For positive-polarity voltages, detachment of electrons from negative ions and photoionization are usually considered the primary free-charge generation mechanisms in SF6 and its mixtures [22]. In the case of electron detachment from negative ions, the source and density of negative ions are unknown for dc voltages [22]. Photoionization has been implemented in previous simulation models as a source of free electrons ahead of positive streamer discharge, and many assumptions were made because no data is available for absorption coefficients, photon absorption lengths, and recombination coefficients for SF6, CO2, and pure N2. It is therefore necessary to investigate other charge-generation mechanisms in such gases.
In this work, the initiation, branching, and propagation of streamer discharge in SF6 and its mixtures with N2 and CO2 are investigated using a 3D particle-in-cell Monte Carlo collision model. Field ionization is included as an electron-generation process, and the rate of field ionization is calculated using Zener’s model. The effects of voltage, pressure, and different mixing ratios on streamer discharge characteristics are observed. A needle-to-plane electrode configuration is adopted because of its relevance to protrusion defects in gas-insulated equipment. The electric-field and potential distributions at different times are also presented.

2. Three-Dimensional PIC/MCC Simulation Model with Field Ionization

Streamer discharge has a stochastic nature; therefore, a 3D simulation model is needed. Particle models with Monte Carlo collision techniques have been extensively used in the field of plasma physics, as they provide detailed information on the discharge process. In this work, a 3D particle-in-cell Monte Carlo collision model (PIC/MCC) is used. The model has been used before to study inception, branching, and propagation in air and N2/O2 under uniform and non-uniform fields for positive- and negative-polarity streamers [23,24,25,26]. A detailed description of the 3D model is available elsewhere, and the source code is available online [26,27]. Here, we briefly describe the model. In the model, electrons added as particles collide with background neutral molecules. Ions are added as immobile densities due to the short time scale of the discharge. The 3D model works under electrostatic conditions, and the effect of an external magnetic field is not considered. Two different schemes, velocity Verlet and leapfrog, are presented and compared for updating the velocity and position of particles. Both schemes are quite similar, except for differences in the calculation of the velocity and position of particles. The velocity Verlet scheme is used in the model, in which the position and velocity of particles are calculated at the same time, whereas in the leapfrog method, velocity and position are calculated with a time offset [25].
x ( t + δ 1 + δ 2 ) = x ( t ) + ( δ 1 + δ 2 ) v ( t ) + 1 2 ( δ 1 + δ 2 ) 2 a ( t )
v ( t + δ 1 + δ 2 ) = v ( t ) + ( δ 1 + δ 2 ) a ( t )
Particle models include a large number of particles, each of which is tracked individually. Superparticles are used to represent such a large number of particles. The weight of superparticles can induce fluctuations, which cause numerical errors. To adjust the weights of superparticles, an adaptive particle management scheme is used in the model. In this technique, the number of particles defined in a cell is given a desired weight according to
w d ( i ) = n s ( i ) V c e l l N p p c
Here, N p p c is the desired number of particles, w d ( i ) is the desired weight, n s ( i ) is the particle number density of type s in cell i, and V c e l l is the volume of a grid cell. Particles weighing w ( i ) < 2 w d ( i ) / 3 merge, and particles weighing w ( i ) > 1.5 w d ( i ) split from neighboring particles. The new merged particles obtain their velocity from one of the merging particles, their average position, and a new weight that is equal to the sum of the merging particles. The splitting particles possess the same position and velocity as the original particle, but their weight becomes half that of the original particle [25,28]. Particle models take electron–neutral collisional cross-sections as input. Because of the low ionization degree in weakly ionized discharges, only electron–neutral collisions are considered, and electron–electron and electron–ion collisions are neglected in the model [26]. The cross-sections of SF6, N2, and CO2 used in the present model are available on Lxcat [29]. The null-collision technique was implemented to model the collision process. The implementation of null-collision methods can be found in [26,30]. The electric field in electrostatic conditions is given by
E = ϕ
ϕ is the electric potential and can be obtained using Poisson’s equation.
2 ϕ = ρ / ε 0
Here, ρ is the charge density. A nested-grid type of adaptive mesh refinement scheme is used in the model to avoid stochastic errors and to resolve space-charge layers with fine resolution [31]. A 3D view and a schematic view of the computational domain used in the present model are shown in Figure 1. The size of the computational domain is (0.5mm) 3. In the 3D model, the electrode is represented by generating multiple points on its surface, spaced at a specified distance (2 µm). The points on the surface of the electrode are closely spaced near the tip of the electrode, and the distance between the points increases away from the electrode tip to reduce computational cost. An iteration procedure is performed to update the charges on these points in order to obtain the closest value to the applied potential V0 [26]. The needle electrode consists of a cylindrical part (rcylinder = 250 µm) that ends in a cone (hcone = 500 µm) with a spherical-shaped tip (10 µm).
A positive voltage is applied to the needle electrode, which is positioned at the center of the domain, while all sides of the domain are kept at zero potential. In the experiments, the bottom of the electrode is insulated within the electrical discharge chamber to prevent the formation of strong electric fields in that area. In the present 3D model, the implementation of dielectric insulation between the electrode and the bottom of the computational domain is not possible. However, grid refinement is not allowed to avoid discharges occurring in the bottom area of the simulation domain. The 3D code is parallelized using the message-passing interface (MPI) to further reduce computation time [26].
(a) Field Ionization
Free-electron generation is a prerequisite for positive discharge initiation and growth. The generated electrons move toward the anode and form electron avalanches, which further transform into a streamer discharge if the streamer criterion is fulfilled. Field ionization, a direct ionization mechanism, is investigated in SF6 and its mixtures with N2 and CO2 as a primary source of ionization. Collisional detachment of electrons from negative ions has been proposed as a charge-generating mechanism in SF6. However, in the dc voltage case, the source and density of negative ions are still questionable. Moreover, collisional detachment cross-section data for SF6 is limited and suggests that if E/N is not sufficiently high, the negative ions will not gain enough kinetic energy between collisions for detachment to occur, and the discharge initiation probability will be negligible [22]. If the electric field is high enough in the range of MV/cm, i.e., in the case of sharper needle electrodes, field-induced charge generation could be possible [32].
In the presence of high electric fields, electrons are elevated from the valence band to the conduction band in a neutral molecule, thus generating a free electron and a positive ion, as shown in Figure 2. Field ionization has been proposed for pressurized dielectric media. It has been experimentally validated as a free-charge carrier-generating process in liquids, transformer oil, and supercritical media [33,34,35,36]. The rate of field ionization is calculated using Zener’s model, first proposed for breakdown in solid dielectrics [37]. The charge density source term in Zener’s model was improved by density functional theory (DFT) and was implemented in transformer oil [35]. The electric-field-dependent charge generation term G 1 ( E ) in Zener’s model is given by
G 1 ( E ) = q 2 n 0 | E | h 1 exp π 2 m * a Δ 2 / q h 2 | E |
Here, E is the applied electric field, q is the electronic charge, n0 is the ionizable density of impurity molecules, m is the effective mass of the electron, a is the separation distance between the molecules, h is Planck’s constant, and Δ is the ionization potential. Due to a lack of comprehensive knowledge about gaseous-state theory, it is challenging to find the appropriate values of Zener’s parameters. The Zener parameters are appropriately selected by making some assumptions to make it work in SF6 and its mixtures, as given in Table 1. As shown in Equation (6), the generation term G 1 ( E ) is mainly affected by the ionization potential, ionizable density, separation distance between the molecules, and electric field. The source of free electrons is impurity molecules, of which a small amount with low ionization potential is added. These impurity molecules are ionized because of field ionization, and electrons and positive ions are generated from them.
It is important to note that field ionization is not a universally dominant mechanism in gaseous dielectrics but is most valid under specific conditions. In particular, it becomes relevant in highly non-uniform electric fields near sharp electrode tips, where the local field strength can reach several MV/cm. Under such conditions, neutral or impurity molecules may undergo field-assisted ionization, generating the initial electrons required for avalanche development. In contrast, at lower pressures or in quasi-uniform field configurations, processes such as photoionization and electron detachment from negative ions are generally considered to play a more significant role in sustaining positive streamer propagation. Therefore, in this work, field ionization is used primarily to investigate discharge initiation in strongly stressed, non-uniform fields, while acknowledging that its applicability is limited for uniform fields and reduced field strengths.
(b) Physical Mechanisms of Electrical Breakdown based on Field Ionization
The breakdown in compressed gases involves a series of physical processes, such as the generation of initial electrons, electron avalanche formation, transition into a streamer, streamer-to-leader transition, and stepped leader propagation across the gap. For smaller gaps (Pd < 1 cm), breakdown occurs via streamers. A streamer is an important and decisive element in predicting the breakdown characteristics of any dielectric medium. The concept of field ionization is implemented to generate free electrons from low-density and low-ionization-potential impurity molecules in SF6 and its mixture with N2 and CO2. In the case of a needle-to-plane electrode geometry, the electric field must be high enough at the needle electrode tip, typically 106–107 V/m, to trigger field ionization. As mentioned earlier, field ionization results in the generation of electrons and positive ions from neutral molecules. The mobility of electrons is five times higher than that of positive ions. Electrons quickly move toward the anode, creating electron avalanches and leaving a bunch of positive ions behind. Electrons reaching the anode are absorbed and removed from the computational domain. The asymmetry in electron and positive ion mobilities leads to the formation of space charge in a short time. The left-behind positive charges form a zone (zone 1) in front of the needle anode, where the sum of the net space charge and background field modifies the total field, as shown in Figure 3. In the modified zone (zone 2), enhanced electric fields cause ionization of more molecules away from the needle electrode, which results in the formation of another zone, i.e., zone 3, with an enhanced electric field. The process continues, and a field wave propagates from the needle electrode across the gap over time.

3. Results and Discussion

The generation of free electrons is a prerequisite for positive streamer discharge inception and propagation. In this work, field ionization is investigated as a source of primary ionization in different gas mixtures. The 3D PIC/MCC simulation results of SF6/N2 and SF6/CO2 at atmospheric pressure in a 1 mm needle-to-plane gap for an anode potential of 4 kV are presented in Figure 4 and Figure 5. The curvature radius of the needle electrode tip was selected to be small, i.e., 10 µm, in order to generate the prerequisite field strength for field ionization in the vicinity of the needle tip. A 4 kV dc voltage was supplied to the needle electrode instantaneously. Initially, there were no free electrons in the computational domain, and discharge started from a seed containing 104 electron–ion pairs.
(a) Streamer initiation at different mixing ratios of SF6/N2
The SF6/N2 mixture is widely used in gas-insulated lines (GILs). A low percentage of SF6 (10–20%) added to N2 improves insulation properties and reduces costs. Figure 4 shows the simulation results of positive needle-to-plane streamer discharges in pure N2, 10% SF6-90% N2, 20% SF6-80% N2, 50% SF6-50% N2, and pure SF6 for a 4 kV voltage supplied to the needle electrode at atmospheric pressure. The discharge was observed until 50 ps. A filamentary-shaped streamer discharge appeared at the needle tip independent of the gas-mixing ratio. Up to 10 ps, a spherical-shaped inception cloud was formed, covering a small fraction of the needle tip, which further deformed into four main streamer channels by 20 ps. The size of the streamer head increased, and a flattened shape was observed just before the secondary branching. The main streamer channels evolving from the inception cloud further expanded into the gap with small, irregular streamer branches of shorter length. The small branches on the main streamer channel showed regular behavior across all gas-mixing ratios, and the length of the small branches increased with increasing SF6 content. In pure N2 and the N2/SF6 mixtures, deflection among the four main streamers was noticeable, while in pure SF6, the discharge channels were more confined. The apparent luminosity of the discharge decreased with the increase in SF6. With the increased content of SF6 in the SF6/N2 mixture, the electron density in the streamer discharge decreased. The addition of SF6 decreased the apparent length and increased the diameter of the streamers. Interestingly, the addition of SF6 to N2 did not have any effect on the initiation of the discharge, which might be due to the initial parameters used in the Zener model. The general morphology of the streamer discharge was quite similar across all gas-mixing ratios. A comparison of the simulation results with other simulation and experimental results is difficult due to incompatible gap sizes and electrode parameters.
The electric-field distribution for different gas-mixing ratios at different times is presented in Figure 5. When a positive voltage was supplied to the needle electrode, a strong electric field was created near the electrode tip. In the presence of this high electric field, free electrons were liberated from impurity molecules and traveled toward the anode, forming an avalanche. While traveling toward the anode, these electrons collided with neutral molecules, and ionization occurred. Electrons reaching the anode were absorbed and removed from the domain, leaving a bunch of slow positive ions behind them. Due to the accumulation of positive ions, the electric field decreased near the anode and increased farther away, creating a new high-field zone away from the anode, as shown in Figure 5. In this new high-field zone, new free electrons were generated, which further took part in ionization, and the process continued. With the propagation of the streamer discharge, the electric field at the head of the streamer channels decreased. On the main streamer channels, there were small electric-field-enhanced zones, causing the formation of small branches. These small branches on the main streamer channels remained for a short time and then quenched. The distribution of the electric field was shown until 50 ps. With increasing SF6 content, the electric field decreased at the head of the main streamer channel.
(b) Streamer initiation at different mixing ratios of SF6/CO2
SF6/N2 is widely applied as an arc-quenching medium in GILs. CO2 and CO2-based gas mixtures are the best candidates to replace SF6 due to their high-voltage switching and insulation properties. Among these, SF6/CO2 has been identified as a suitable substitute for SF6 in gas-insulated transformers (GITs), where non-uniform fields exist. The breakdown strength of SF6/CO2 (20%/80%) mixtures can be higher than that of pure SF6 due to the corona stabilization effect under highly non-uniform field conditions present in GITs [4]. The 3D PIC/MCC simulation results for SF6/CO2 gas mixtures at different mixing ratios are presented in Figure 6 Three stages of streamer discharge were observed. At 0 ps, there were no free electrons in the computational domain, and no discharge occurred. Discharge was initiated from a seed placed at the needle tip. When a positive dc voltage was supplied to the needle electrode, a high electric field was generated near the needle electrode tip. Because of field ionization, free electrons were liberated from impurity molecules. Due to their high mobility, free electrons traveled toward the anode, forming electron avalanches, while positive ions were left behind. From 0 ps to 10 ps, the first stage of the streamer discharge, i.e., inception, a cloud appeared at the needle tip. Over time, the inception cloud deformed into the main streamer channels, i.e., the second stage of streamer discharge. Secondary branches appeared on both sides of the main streamer channels and propagated at the same speed into the gap. The length of the secondary branches on the main channels decreased with increasing SF6 content. With the addition of SF6, the apparent length of the overall streamer discharge decreased. Two-dimensional slices of the electric-field distribution at the needle tip along the streamer propagation for different gas-mixing ratios are presented in Figure 7. The electric field first increased when 10% SF6 was added to pure CO2 and then decreased with further increases in SF6 content. With increasing SF6, the electric-field distribution turned into a ring shape around the main streamer channels. The main channels were more confined to each other in pure SF6.
To further validate the simulation results, we qualitatively compared our findings with previously reported experimental studies on SF6-based mixtures. Experimental investigations in needle–plane geometries have consistently shown that increasing the proportion of SF6 reduces the apparent length of streamers and suppresses branching due to its strong electron-attachment properties [4,10,11]. Similarly, Chalmers et al. [10] and Malik and Qureshi [11] reported that higher gas pressure significantly increases breakdown strength, thereby shortening the discharge channels, which aligns with our simulation results at 5 bar. Moreover, studies on CO2 and SF6/CO2 mixtures [12,20] have shown more pronounced branching compared to SF6/N2, which agrees with the higher electron density and longer branches observed in our simulations for SF6/CO2. Although a quantitative comparison is challenging because of differences in geometry, voltage waveforms, and electrode gap distances, the qualitative agreement between the simulated streamer characteristics and the experimental trends increases confidence in the physical validity of the proposed model.
The findings of this study have direct relevance for the design and operation of high-voltage equipment. In gas-insulated switchgear (GIS) and circuit breakers (CBs), where compact geometries and non-uniform fields are common, the reduced streamer length and branching observed with increasing SF6 content explain why even small additions of SF6 to buffer gases such as N2 or CO2 can significantly improve insulation reliability. The stronger branching and higher electron densities observed in SF6/CO2 mixtures indicate that this mixture may be less favorable for applications where streamer suppression is critical, but it may still provide advantages in highly non-uniform field environments such as gas-insulated transformers (GITs), where corona stabilization effects are beneficial. These insights support the current industrial preference for SF6/N2 in GIS while highlighting specific scenarios where SF6/CO2 could be a viable alternative. Thus, the simulation results not only help clarify the fundamental discharge mechanisms but also provide guidance for selecting appropriate gas mixtures in eco-friendly high-voltage equipment.
(c) Influence of Pressure
The influence of pressure on the discharge evolution at the same voltage for different gas-mixing ratios of SF6/N2 and SF6/CO2 is presented in Figure 8 and Figure 9. Dielectric strength generally increased with the increase in pressure. The addition of SF6 resulted in further increases in the breakdown strength. The apparent discharge length and the number of streamer branches decreased considerably with the increase in pressure. The electron density in SF6/CO2 mixtures was higher than in SF6/N2 mixtures. In both SF6/N2 and SF6/CO2, increasing the SF6 content decreased the discharge length and electron density.

4. Conclusions

A 3D particle-in-cell simulation with field ionization was used to investigate positive streamer initiation in SF6/N2 and SF6/CO2, considering different mixing ratios at two pressures (1 and 5 bar). The key results are as follows:
  • By increasing the SF6 content, the number of branches and the length of streamers decreased for both mixtures, with the lowest values observed in the case of pure SF6.
  • The morphology of the streamer discharge remained the same irrespective of the gas mixture.
  • Streamer branching and length were clearly higher in SF6/CO2 than in SF6/N2, which is one of the reasons the SF6/N2 mixture is currently used as an SF6 alternative for gaseous insulation in high-voltage equipment.
  • Increasing the pressure had a significant impact on streamer branching and length in both mixtures.
While this study focused on a 1 mm needle–plane configuration due to its relevance to protrusion defects in GIS, future work will extend the model to larger gap distances and alternative electrode geometries (e.g., coaxial arrangements) to enhance its applicability to practical high-voltage equipment. The 3D model with field ionization could be the primary choice for investigating streamer dynamics in SF6-based mixtures to explore various ionization mechanisms. However, its validity at lower pressures and in uniform fields is still an open research question and needs to be addressed in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.F.A.; methodology, M.F.A.; software, M.F.A., B.G.; validation, M.F.A., G.S., B.G.; formal analysis, M.F.A., G.S., Y.X.; investigation, M.F.A.; resources, M.F.A., G.S.; data curation, M.F.A., B.G.; writing original draft, M.F.A.; writing reviewing and editing, G.S., B.G., Y.X.; visualization, M.F.A., G.S., B.G.; supervision, M.F.A., G.S.; project administration, M.F.A., G.S., Y.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author(s).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yanabu, S.; Murayama, Y.; Matsumoto, S. SF6 insulation and its application to HV equipment. IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. 1991, 26, 358–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. C37.122.3-2011; IEEE Guide for Sulphur Hexafluoride (SF6) Gas Handling for High-Voltage (over 1000 Vac) Equipment. IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2012; pp. 1–69. [CrossRef]
  3. Malik, N.H.; Qureshi, A.H. A Review of Electrical Breakdown in Mixtures of SF6 and Other Gases. IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. 1979, EI-14, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Qiu, Y.; Kuffel, E. Comparison of SF6/N2 and SF6/CO2 gas mixtures as alternatives to SF6 gas. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 1999, 6, 892–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Seeger, M. Perspectives on Research on High Voltage Gas Circuit Breakers. Plasma Chem. Plasma Process. 2015, 35, 527–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Uchii, T.; Hoshina, Y.; Miyazaki, K.; Mori, T.; Kawano, H.; Nakamoto, T.; Hirano, Y. Development of 72 kV class enviornmentally-benign CO2 gas circuit breaker model. IEEJ Trans. Power Energy B 2004, 124, 476–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stoller, P.C.; Seeger, M.; Iordanidis, A.A.; Naidis, G.V. CO2 as an Arc Interruption Medium in Gas Circuit Breakers. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2013, 41, 2359–2369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, B.; Uzelac, N.; Cao, Y. Fluoronitrile/CO2 mixture as an eco-friendly alternative to SF6 for medium voltage switchgears. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2018, 25, 1340–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Nechmi, H.; Beroual, A.; Girodet, A.; Vinson, P. Fluoronitriles/CO2 gas mixture as promising substitute to SF6 for insulation in high voltage applications. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2016, 23, 2587–2593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chalmers, I.D.; Gallimberti, I.; Gibert, A.; Farish, O.; Forrest John, S. The development of electrical leader discharges in a point-plane gap in SF6. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A. Math. Phys. Sci. 1987, 412, 285–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Malik, N.H.; Qureshi, A.H. Breakdown Mechanisms in Sulphur-Hexafluoride. IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. 1978, EI-13, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lozansky, E.D.; Firsov, O.B. Theory of the initial stage of streamer propagation. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 1973, 6, 976–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Morrow, R. Theory of positive corona in SF/sub 6/ due to a voltage impulse. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 1991, 19, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Dhali, S.K.; Pal, A.K. Numerical simulation of streamers in SF6. J. Appl. Phys. 1988, 63, 1355–1362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jianfen, L.; Raju, G.R.G. Simulation of corona discharge. Positive corona in SF/sub 6. IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 1994, 1, 530–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rose, D.V.; Welch, D.R.; Clark, R.E.; Thoma, C.; Zimmerman, W.R.; Bruner, N.; Rambo, P.K.; Atherton, B.W. Towards a fully kinetic 3D electromagnetic particle-in-cell model of streamer formation and dynamics in high-pressure electronegative gases. Phys. Plasmas 2011, 18, 093501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Rabie, M.; Franck, C.M. A study of the avalanche-to-streamer transition in arbitrary gases by particle simulation. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2016, 49, 175202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wang, L.; Ou, X.; Zheng, Y.; Liu, J.; Lin, X.; Zhang, T. Numerical simulations of the SF6-N2 mixed gas streamer discharge development process. AIP Adv. 2019, 9, 055320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, M.; Wang, F.; Zhao, F.F.; Xu, S.Z.; Fan, J.M.; Chen, X.L.; Huang, C.Z. Numerical Simulation of Rod-Plate Gap Streamer Discharge in SF6/N2 Gas Mixtures Based on ETG-FCT Method. Math. Probl. Eng. 2015, 2015, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Levko, D.; Pachuilo, M.; Raja, L.L. Particle-in-cell modeling of streamer branching in CO2 gas. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2017, 50, 354004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kolb, J.F.; Joshi, R.P.; Xiao, S.; Schoenbach, K.H. Streamers in water and other dielectric liquids. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2008, 41, 234007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Vanbrunt, R.J.; Misakian, M. Mechanisms for Inception of DC and 60-Hz AC Corona in SF6. IEEE Trans. Electr. Insul. 1982, 17, 106–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Birdsall, C.K. Particle-in-cell charged-particle simulations, plus Monte Carlo collisions with neutral atoms, PIC-MCC. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 1991, 19, 65–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sun, A.; Teunissen, J.; Ebert, U. The inception of pulsed discharges in air: Simulations in background fields above and below breakdown. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2014, 47, 445205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sun, A.; Becker, M.M.; Loffhagen, D. PIC/MCC simulation of capacitively coupled discharges: Effect of particle management and integration. Comput. Phys. Commun. 2016, 206, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Teunissen, J.; Ebert, U. 3D PIC-MCC simulations of discharge inception around a sharp anode in nitrogen/oxygen mixtures. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 2016, 25, 044005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Multiscale Dynamics Group. CWI Multiscale Dynamics Webpage. Available online: http://cwi.nl/en/research/multiscale-dynamics/ (accessed on 1 December 2024).
  28. Teunissen, J.; Ebert, U. Controlling the weights of simulation particles: Adaptive particle management using k-d trees. J. Comput. Phys. 2014, 259, 318–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. LXcat Team. The LXcat Project. 2018. Available online: http://lxcat.net (accessed on 1 December 2024).
  30. Koura, K. Null-collision technique in the direct-simulation Monte Carlo method. Phys. Fluids 1986, 29, 3509–3511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Montijn, C.; Hundsdorfer, W.; Ebert, U. An adaptive grid refinement strategy for the simulation of negative streamers. J. Comput. Phys. 2006, 219, 801–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Schweinler, H.C.; Christophorou, L.G. Calculation of Electric Field-Induced Detachment from Mononegative Ions; Relevance to Gaseous Dielectrics. In Gaseous Dielectrics ll, Proceedings of the Second Internatinal Symposium on Gaseous Dielectrics, Knoxville, TN, USA, 9–13 March 1980; Christophorou, L.G., Ed.; Pergamon Press: Oxford, UK, 1980; pp. 12–24. [Google Scholar]
  33. Devins, J.C.; Rzad, S.J.; Schwabe, R.J. Breakdown and prebreakdown phenomena in liquids. J. Appl. Phys. 1981, 52, 4531–4545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. An, W.; Baumung, K.; Bluhm, H. Underwater streamer propagation analyzed from detailed measurements of pressure release. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101, 053302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jadidian, J.; Zahn, M.; Lavesson, N.; Widlund, O.; Borg, K. Impulse breakdown delay in liquid dielectrics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 192910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Sun, A.; Teunissen, J.; Ebert, U. 3-D Particle Modeling of Positive Streamer Inception From a Needle Electrode in Supercritical Nitrogen. IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 2014, 42, 2416–2417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zener, C. A theory of the electrical breakdown of solid dielectrics. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. A Math. Phys. Sci. 1934, 145, 523–529. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. (a) Three-dimensional view and (b) schematic view of the computational domain.
Figure 1. (a) Three-dimensional view and (b) schematic view of the computational domain.
Applsci 15 10331 g001
Figure 2. Production of electrons and positive ions from a neutral molecule under a high electric field due to field ionization.
Figure 2. Production of electrons and positive ions from a neutral molecule under a high electric field due to field ionization.
Applsci 15 10331 g002
Figure 3. Illustration of the inception and growth of discharge due to field ionization.
Figure 3. Illustration of the inception and growth of discharge due to field ionization.
Applsci 15 10331 g003
Figure 4. Three-dimensional evolution of positive needle-to-plane streamer discharge with field ionization for (a) 100% N2, (b) 10% SF6 / 90% N2, (c) 20% SF6 / 80% N2, (d) 50% SF6 / 50% N2, and (e) 100% SF6 at 4 kV electrode voltage at atmospheric pressure.
Figure 4. Three-dimensional evolution of positive needle-to-plane streamer discharge with field ionization for (a) 100% N2, (b) 10% SF6 / 90% N2, (c) 20% SF6 / 80% N2, (d) 50% SF6 / 50% N2, and (e) 100% SF6 at 4 kV electrode voltage at atmospheric pressure.
Applsci 15 10331 g004
Figure 5. Two-dimensional slices of the electric-field distribution for different mixing ratios in SF6/N2.
Figure 5. Two-dimensional slices of the electric-field distribution for different mixing ratios in SF6/N2.
Applsci 15 10331 g005
Figure 6. Three-dimensional evolution of positive needle-to-plane streamer discharge with field ionization for (a) 100% CO2, (b) 10% SF6 / 90% CO2, (c) 20% SF6 / 80% CO2, (d) 50% SF6 / 50% CO2, and (e) 100% SF6 at 4 kV electrode voltage at atmospheric pressure.
Figure 6. Three-dimensional evolution of positive needle-to-plane streamer discharge with field ionization for (a) 100% CO2, (b) 10% SF6 / 90% CO2, (c) 20% SF6 / 80% CO2, (d) 50% SF6 / 50% CO2, and (e) 100% SF6 at 4 kV electrode voltage at atmospheric pressure.
Applsci 15 10331 g006
Figure 7. Two-dimensional slice of the electric-field distribution for different mixing ratios in SF6/CO2.
Figure 7. Two-dimensional slice of the electric-field distribution for different mixing ratios in SF6/CO2.
Applsci 15 10331 g007
Figure 8. Three-dimensional evolution of streamer discharge for different gas-mixing ratios at 5 bar: (a) 100% N2, (b) 10% SF6 / 90% N2, (c) 20% SF6 / 80% N2, (d) 50% SF6 / 50% N2, and (e) 100% SF6.
Figure 8. Three-dimensional evolution of streamer discharge for different gas-mixing ratios at 5 bar: (a) 100% N2, (b) 10% SF6 / 90% N2, (c) 20% SF6 / 80% N2, (d) 50% SF6 / 50% N2, and (e) 100% SF6.
Applsci 15 10331 g008
Figure 9. Three-dimensional evolution of streamer discharge for different gas-mixing ratios at 5 bar: (a) 100% CO2, (b) 10% SF6 / 90% CO2, (c) 20% SF6 / 80% CO2, (d) 50% SF6 / 50% CO2, and (e) 100% SF6.
Figure 9. Three-dimensional evolution of streamer discharge for different gas-mixing ratios at 5 bar: (a) 100% CO2, (b) 10% SF6 / 90% CO2, (c) 20% SF6 / 80% CO2, (d) 50% SF6 / 50% CO2, and (e) 100% SF6.
Applsci 15 10331 g009
Table 1. Parameters used in Zener’s model.
Table 1. Parameters used in Zener’s model.
ParameterValues
Ionizable density (n0)1 × 1026 m−3
Molecular separation distance (a)3 × 10−10 m
Ionization potential (Δ)4.6 eV
Effective mass (m)0.1 × me (mass of an electron)
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abbas, M.F.; Sun, G.; Guo, B.; Xin, Y. Three-Dimensional Simulation-Based Comparison of Streamer Initiation in SF6/N2 and SF6/CO2 for Different Mixing Ratios and Pressures. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 10331. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910331

AMA Style

Abbas MF, Sun G, Guo B, Xin Y. Three-Dimensional Simulation-Based Comparison of Streamer Initiation in SF6/N2 and SF6/CO2 for Different Mixing Ratios and Pressures. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(19):10331. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910331

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abbas, Muhammad Farasat, Guangyu Sun, Baohong Guo, and Yanbin Xin. 2025. "Three-Dimensional Simulation-Based Comparison of Streamer Initiation in SF6/N2 and SF6/CO2 for Different Mixing Ratios and Pressures" Applied Sciences 15, no. 19: 10331. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910331

APA Style

Abbas, M. F., Sun, G., Guo, B., & Xin, Y. (2025). Three-Dimensional Simulation-Based Comparison of Streamer Initiation in SF6/N2 and SF6/CO2 for Different Mixing Ratios and Pressures. Applied Sciences, 15(19), 10331. https://doi.org/10.3390/app151910331

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop