Next Article in Journal
Inline Monitoring of Lithium Brines with Low-Field NMR
Previous Article in Journal
Supercritical Fluids as Alternative Insulation and Arc-Quenching Medium
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Assessment of the Impact of Gypsum Deposit Development on Changes in the Radiation Environment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Thirteen-Year Cesium-137 Distribution Environmental Analysis in an Undisturbed Area

by
Sergio Suárez-Contreras
1,2,
Víctor Sánchez-Mendieta
2,
Beatriz Hernández-Méndez
1,
Juan Carlos Sánchez-Meza
2 and
Miguel Balcázar
1,*
1
Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares, Carretera México-Toluca S/N, Ocoyoacac C.P. 52750, Estado de México, Mexico
2
Facultad de Química, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Paseo Colón y Paseo Tollocan S/N, Toluca C.P. 50120, Estado de México, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(18), 9982; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189982
Submission received: 23 June 2025 / Revised: 3 September 2025 / Accepted: 8 September 2025 / Published: 12 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Environmental Radioactivity Monitoring and Measurement)

Abstract

137Cs activity concentration in soil was analyzed yearly for 13 years (2010–2022) in an undisturbed area in Mexico. The temporal variation at 17 sampling points is consistent with the natural radioactive decrease of 137Cs, excluding increased activity concentration detected after the Fukushima accident at 4 sampling points. Geospatial analysis was permitted to obtain 137Cs activity concentration distributions for each year. The highest 137Cs activity concentration was found at higher topography levels and close to intermittent water streams: 87.1 ± 5.5 Bq kg−1 for the year 2011, which increased to 135.5 ± 14.5 Bq kg−1 for the year 2013, and then 137Cs decreased down to 46.4 ± 4.0 Bq kg−1 by the year 2022. The lowest 137Cs activity concentration was in the range of 0.6 ± 0.1 Bq kg−1 to 13.5 ± 1.0 Bq kg−1 at the points far from the undisturbed area, probably due to anthropogenic activities.

1. Introduction

Uranium fission from nuclear power plants and nuclear weapon tests produces radioactive cesium isotopes 134Cs and 137Cs, which are transformed into stable elements by radioactive decay. The isotope 134Cs decays with a half life of 2.06 years to the non-radioactive isotope 134Xe, while the radioactive isotope 137Cs decays with a halflife of 30.08 years to the stable nuclei 137Ba [1].
137Cs is deposited in soil, water and vegetation in different proportions in the environment. The so-called radioactive fallout from nuclear weapon testing and accidents defines its distribution into the environment. These radioactive concentrations increase potential damage to public health and economic activities, as they can contaminate the food chain and risk long-term radiation exposure [2].
It is estimated that 948 PBq of 137Cs was globally emitted into the atmosphere during the period 1945–1993 by nuclear weapon tests [3]. These tests were both on land and underground in the deep atolls of sea, especially the Pacific Ocean. The nuclear accident that occurred at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant in Ukraine on 26 April 1986 locally emitted 70 PBq of 137Cs into the atmosphere and 11 PBq of 137Cs was locally emitted from the nuclear power accident in Fukushima Daiichi, Japan, on 11 March 2011. Table 1 summarizes these emissions.
The highest 137Cs deposition in the environment has been towards the Northern Hemisphere, with the peak deposition occurring around 1963 [6,7].
In the days following the Chernobyl accident, a radioactive cloud transferred 137Cs to the northern European countries, generating contamination to grasslands and to faunae that consumed those grasslands [8,9]. Ireland, a milk exporter, was one of the most affected countries because a significant amount of 137Cs was transferred to cow’s milk [10]. Mexico detected and prevented the consumption of 39,000 tons of powdered milk imported from the Republic of Ireland in 1987 [11].
International regulations levels on 137Cs radioactive contamination in food, acceptable for human consumption, began by the “Codex Alimentarius” at the end of 1986 at Rome, Italy. The Mexican Ministry of Health published the strictest limit of 50 Bq kg−1 for 137Cs radioactivity in milk as technical standard 316 in the Official Gazette in August 1988 [12]; in the November of same year, a new “Codex Alimentarius” meeting agreed a limit of 150 Bq kg−1 [11].
137C is considered the leading source of long-term man-made radiation to the public, scattered in the environment and it has a relatively long half-life of 30.08 years [13,14,15,16,17]. Therefore, its evolution in the environment is of interest to assess the risks to the population and ecosystems [18,19,20,21]. Because radionuclides can be incorporated into the food chain [2], it is important to identify the origin and presence of radioactive elements in order to anticipate their possible impacts.
137Cs radionuclide released into the atmosphere is transported to the stratosphere, gradually descending to the Earth’s surface. 137Cs then meets the soil and can only move with the soil’s constituent particles, meaning that any change in 137Cs readings indicates soil redistribution processes by physical agents (erosion). Given this use of 137Cs, the concept of reference sites emerged, which was developed to quantitatively express the processes of loss and accumulation. According to the FAO/IAEA, from the year 2017, no sedimentation has occurred in addition to the original 137Cs radioactive fallout/deposition and the reductions are due to radioactive decay. The method is based on a comparison of the studied and reference sites. If the studied site contains less 137Cs than the reference site, it implies that the studied site is eroded. If the number of 137Cs recorded is higher, it indicates accumulation due to sedimentation. This simple relationship is interpreted using conversion models to convert the differentiated 137Cs records into soil erosion and/or sedimentation rates. For a correct interpretation of the 137Cs method, the correct selection of the reference site is crucial [22].
Radioactive 137Cs fallout is reported to have greater deposition in the Northern Hemisphere, while very little is known about the spatial distribution of its deposition in the Southern Hemisphere. However, recent studies indicate a possible underestimated distribution in the latitudinal range (10–20°) N and (50–70°) S. The limited 137Cs studies on the Southern Hemisphere suggest uncertainties on 137Cs distribution and the factors governing it [23].
Mexico is located in the latitude range (14° to 32°) N; there are only two 137Cs reports in Mexico on activity concentration in soils by Garay et al., 2003 [24] and Hernández, 2018 [25], at Zacatecas and Jalisco, respectively. This paper covers a broader study of 137Cs environmental fallout analysis over thirteen years in an undisturbed area.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Site Description

The study site shown in Figure 1 is a rural area towards the south of Jalisco and Zacatecas and north México City. The site location is geo-referenced, and contour lines are displayed in black in Figure 1a,b. The elevation file is downloaded from the WebGis site, SRMT3 (Shuttle Radar Topography Mission); the file for Mexico has a resolution of up to 90 × 90 m [26]. The file is subsequently incorporated into the module AERMAP for obtaining a georeferenced map. Hydrology layers are obtained from the National Commission for the Knowledge and Use of Biodiversity from Mexico [27] to view the water flows in the study area. Figure 1b shows the site, far from anthropogenic activities, where thirteen points (the blue points) are located. During the rainy season, the area has intermittent water streams (shown with a light blue color) that flow towards the descending topography direction of the site. One of the water streams flows from the southeast to the central north, descending from a higher elevation; the maximum elevation difference is 53 m at the northwest and southeast regions; the others move from the southeast to the southwest.

2.2. Sampling and Measurements

The sampling strategy identifies undisturbed anthropogenic sites with 137Cs potentially present, which could be a risk to humans, including wetlands and grazing areas. Sampling points were selected along a 765 m linear transect parallel to the intermittent water streams at accessible locations for safety sampling conditions paths. Additionally, four sampling points were placed in a selected zone to the south, which are considered unaffected by 137Cs overflow transport, being influenced only by atmospheric deposition and the initially suspected pedestrian circulation. Soil from seventeen sampling points is collected yearly from 2010 to 2022 with some exceptions due to COVID-19 pandemic conditions. Each sample consists of 1.0 kg of soil taken from the first 0.2 m top surface. Each sample was placed in pre-labeled polyethylene bags and sealed to prevent mixing and contamination. The bags were then taken to the laboratory where they were dried at 40 °C for 24 h, and then crushed and sieved to 100 μm mesh. Then samples were dried again at 100 °C for 24 h to remove undesirable moisture traces. Each sample was placed in a Marinelli beaker of approximately 0.5 L in volume to introduce it to a gamma spectroscopy detector (AMETEK ORTEC, Oak Ridge, TN, USA) for analysis. The detector is a high-resolution Ortec HPGe (high-purity germanium) with a 30% relative efficiency [28]. Calibration and efficiency of the Ge(Hp) detector was performed following ANSI Standard N.42.14–1999 [29], employing certified sources which allow multi-analysis isotopes in the energy ranges from 46 keV to 1836 keV. The resulting multi-elemental analysis of soil samples included the presence of 137Cs. Presence of 137Cs photopeak is at 661.87 keV energy as a result of the multi-elemental analysis with the Ge(Hp) detector.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. 137Cs Activity Concentration

Table 2 indicate the 211 samples collected from 2021 to 2022 at seventeen sampling points (first column) 52 samples were not suitable for analysis and have been marked as lack of information (LI) the activity concentration of the remaining 169 samples is given in Bq kg−1. Errors in measurements are around 10% for two digits figures and around 50% for one digit. The capital letter U attached to the number of the point means that the point is located upstream, whereas the capital letter D means that the point is located downstream (see Figure 1).
At the beginning of the sapling years (2010 and 2011), there were six relative anomalous 137Cs concentrations higher than 40 Bq kg−1, which show the right selection of undisturbed sites for continuing the present study. Point 4U was 87.1 Bq kg−1, the highest 137Cs value of those six points that, for being up the hill, looks “normal” to us.
The first four points in Table 2, 4U, 13U, 2D and 12D (showed in green) show peaks of 137Cs activity concentration from the Fukushima accident in 2011. This 137Cs peak is shown delayed in time (point 4U and 13U) and reveals that the intermittent water stream (see Figure 1) has an influence in this delayed time, because the 137Cs peak is shown much later in the points 13U and 12D downstream as one would expect. This 137Cs peak effect is either not observed at other points due to the lack of experimental information (yellow points) because points are not close to water stream or because points are located far into an anthropogenic area where the 137Cs activity concentration is lower (shown in gray).
Sampling points 14, 15, 16 and 17 in Table 2 (shown in gray) are located 1.1 km to 5.8 km away from the center area (see Figure 1a). Their range of 137Cs activity concentration for all years is (0.7 ± 0.1–13.5 ± 1.0) Bq kg−1, which is similar to or less than the values of 137Cs found in other studies, that took place in Zacatecas [25] and Jalisco [24] and much lower concentrations, than those in the United States of America [30] and Canada [6], as shown in Table 3.

3.2. Projected 137Cs Decay for Reported Data

A 137Cs decay curve construction is carried out to graphically compare these reported results to published results, which help to compare 137Cs activity concentration reported in different years. Reference [3] mentions a 137Cs world deposition of 948 PBq from 1945 to 1993, 48 years. This is an integral value in those 48 years. We chose zero (1945) as the lower limit in the integral and the upper limit of the integral as 48 (corresponding to 1993). The curve in Figure 2 is constructed by integrating the decay in Equation (1). Once we have the equation, it is possible to extend the graph up to 2012 (for the period 2022–1945 = 77 years), the year we have evaluated 137Cs in. Curve A(t) was use for 137Cs as a function of time in those 48 years from 1945 up to 1993 and to extend the curve up to 2022.
A t = 0 48 A 0   e λ t d t
where λ decay constant and t1/2 is the half-life of 137Cs given by
λ = 0.693 t 1 / 2 = 0.693 30.08
948   P B q = 0 48 A 0   e 0.693 30.08 t d t
948   P B q = A 0 0.023 [ 0.3315 1 ]
A 0 1945 = 32.911   P B q
Then
A t = 32.911   e 0.023 ( t )   P B q
The corresponding plot is displayed in Figure 2. The red line shows the expected 137Cs decay curve from nuclear tests globally released to the environment in the period 1945–2022. Two local 137Cs emissions, not globally reported, from the Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents, are shown on the curve.

3.3. 137Cs Decay Behavior for Experimental Data

Similar decay-curve calculations were applied for 137Cs activity concentration measurements shown in Table 2. Figure 3 shows the experimental points taken from Table 2 as blue bars for four sampling points 4U, 13U, 2D and 12D. Each extrapolated 137C decay-curve (shown as blue triangles) is normalized to the last 137Cs activity concentration obtained in 2012 (column three in Table 4) and are extrapolated back to the expected 137Cs decay activity concentration at the time of the Chernobyl accident (column two in Table 4).
The maximum 137Cs activity concentration from Table 3 is used to construct the decay curves for the United States of America (red rhombic), Canada (red triangles), Zacatecas (blue squares) and Jalisco (blue rhombic). Note that the 137Cs concentration displayed in blue figures in Figure 3 corresponds to the blue y-axis on the right-hand side, whereas red figures correspond to the y-axis on the left-hand side. The 137Cs value at the reported year was used as the normalization point for building the corresponding decay curves extrapolating them back to Chernobyl and to the year 2023.
137Cs activity concentration data from Table 2 for points 4U, 13U, 2D and 12D are shown as blue bars in Figure 3. Several of the 13 remaining measuring points do not follow similar decay tendency either due to the lack of information (LI, see Table 2) or because they are 1.1 km to 5.8 km away from the site, where the normal anthropogenic activities avoided natural accumulation of fallout 137Cs.
Two of those six points, 4U and 13U, are located at the southeast, the other two points, 2D and 12D, are placed to the north; all four points are situated close to an intermittent water stream running from southeast to north (see the light-blue line in Figure 1). The thick blue bars on curves at curves 4U, 13U, 2D and 12D show that the 137Cs activity concentration increases due to the Fukushima Daichii accident that occurred in 2011. This 137Cs increment has a delay time of more than two years for point 4U and point 13U, situated at the highest altitude of the study site (see Table 4). There is a five-year delay to point 2D and an eight-years delay to point 12D (see Table 4), situated at the lower elevation of the study site, which denote a 137Cs slow natural transport, from southeast to north, due to the difference in height of the land and because the four points are close to the intermittent water stream. By the year 2022, all 17 points have reduced their 137Cs activity concentration in the range of (46.4 ± 4.0–0.8 ± 0.2) Bq kg−1 as indicated in Table 2.
The 137Cs activity concentration obtained in this study is lower than that for the northern countries Canada and USA. Although the extrapolation of the curves for the study site is slightly higher than for the states of Jalisco and Zacatecas, this is due to the fact that the site is undisturbed, whereas in those states, the studies reported them as having anthropogenic activity.

3.4. Spatial Distribution of 137Cs

All 137Cs activity concentration distribution in soil was spatially analyzed for each year; Figure 4 shows the results of 137Cs interpolation for the year 2011, which is the year with the highest activity concentration at the study site before Fukushima effect. The points of highest activity concentration are most found to the south, decreasing towards the north of the study site; see the activity concentration values in the table inserted at the left-hand side of Figure 4. Several sampling points are located near an intermittent water stream (blue line) running from southeast to north.
Figure 5 shows the 137Cs activity concentration distributions for the years 2011, 2013 and 2022. A general pattern is identified for the three distributions; the maximum activity concentration (red vertical bar guiding the eye) is located in the south, where the corresponding sampling points are at the highest altitude of the site. A decrease of 137Cs is identified in the north area (green vertical bar) at the lowest altitude of the site, close to intermittent water streams. The distribution of 137Cs activity concentration for the year 2011 has a maximum range of (40–87.1) Bq kg−1; this range did not reduce two years after in 2013, but the range increased to (46.2–135.5) Bq kg−1 due to 137Cs fallout from the Fukushima accident and its deposition on soil. Nine years later, in 2022, the maximum 137Cs interval is (31.8–46.4) Bq kg−1, showing the 137Cs decay effect and natural movement of 137Cs due to environmental conditions.
The highest 137Cs activity concentration is found at point 4U, 87.1 ± 5.5 Bq kg−1 and 135.5 ± 14.5 Bq kg−1 for the years 2011 and 2013, respectively; those activity concentrations reduce to 29.3 ± 1.5 Bq kg−1 by the year 2022. The decreasing activity concentration rate for the two points 2D and 12D are lower than expected due to the topography condition, because those two points are at the lowest elevation zone at the north of the site, whose difference is 53 m from south, and the intermittent water stream plays an important effect in the long-time transport of 137Cs.
These reported results are consistent with other researchers [31,32,33,34,35], who determined that 137Cs deposition in soils from nuclear accidents, specifically Chernobyl in 1986 and Fukushima in 2011, is transported to topographic places of lower elevation due to natural temperature gradients and rainfall. At the study site, the highest rainfall occurs in July and the lowest in February; however, it was not possible to find a possible correlation to annual rainfall to 137Cs.

4. Conclusions

During the thirteen years of the sampling period, it was corroborated that the study area had no human activity that was possible to use to analyze the temporal 137Cs activity concentration.
The 137Cs peak contribution resulting from the Fukushima accident was noticeably detected in the constructed decay curves at four sampling points, 4U, 13U, 2D and 12D. This suggests a post-event deposition by rainfall over the study area and slow 137Cs transport by intermittent water stream running from south to north.
The distribution of 137Cs activity concentration for the year 2013 clearly represents the maximum 137Cs contribution from the Fukushima accident whose concentrations are lower or within environmental concentrations in Canada and USA.
The four sampling points 14, 15, 16 and 17 are outside the undisturbed zone where there is pedestrian circulation; nearly 50% of the samples had 137Cs activity concentration below detection (LI) and the rest of the samples had low 137Cs activity concertation due to anthropogenic disturbance of the zone. A study [36] reports that the 137Cs inventories differ due to the existence of different landforms and deposition environments, ranging from geographic depressions to areas with anthropogenic activities.
This first long-term 137Cs deposition study of 17 sampling points at latitude 19N corroborates the statement of previous studies that major 137Cs deposition has occurred towards the Northern Hemisphere. The maximum 137Cs activity concentration of this work is lower than the maximum 137Cs activity concentrations found in Canada and the USA.
Although the non-disturbance anthropogenic characteristics result from our site of study, this site cannot be used as a reference site for erosion studies [22] because there is disturbance in the site, due to environmental characteristics of the area, specifically the low 137Cs transportation by intermittent water streams.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B., V.S.-M., S.S.-C. and B.H.-M.; Methodology, S.S.-C. and B.H.-M.; Software, S.S.-C.; Validation, S.S.-C.; Formal Analysis, S.S.-C., M.B. and V.S.-M.; Investigation, S.S.-C. and B.H.-M.; Data Curation, S.S.-C. and B.H.-M.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, S.S.-C. and M.B.; Writing—Review & Editing, S.S.-C., B.H.-M., VSM, J.C.S.-M. and M.B.; Visualization, S.S.-C. and M.B.; Supervision, M.B. and V.S.-M.; Project Administration, M.B. and V.S.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. ATSDR. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. In Toxicological Profile for Cesium; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  2. Stager, F.; Zok, D.; Schiller, A.K.; Feng, B.; Steinhauser, G. Disproportionately High Contributions of 60-Year-Old Weapons-137Cs Explain the Persistence of Radioactive Contamination in Bavarian Wild Boars. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2023, 57, 13601–13611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation). Sources, Eeffects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation; UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes Volume I: Sources 2000; United Nations Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2000; p. 659. [Google Scholar]
  4. UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation). Sources and Eeffects of Ionizing Radiation; United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 1993 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes; United Nations Publications: New York, NY, USA, 1993; 920p. [Google Scholar]
  5. UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation). Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation; UNSCEAR 2013 Report. Volume I. Report to the General Assembly Scientific Annex A: Levels and effects of radiation exposure due to the nuclear accident after the 2011 great east-Japan earthquake and tsunami; United Nations Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2013; p. 321. [Google Scholar]
  6. Blagoeva, R.; Zikovsky, L. Geographic and vertical distribution of Cs-137 in soils in Canada. J. Environ. Radioact. 1995, 27, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Aoyama, M.; Hirose, K.; Igarashi, Y. Re-construction and updating our understanding on the global weapons tests Cs-137 fallout. J. Environ. Monit. 2006, 8, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Gilmore, B.J.; Cranley, K. Radionuclide monitoring in Northern Ireland of the Chernobyl nuclear reactor accident. Ulster Med. J. 1987, 56, 45–53. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  9. Kevin, D.; John, H. Radiation Levels in Milk and Meat in Ireland after Chernobyl (INIS-XA-C--069); International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA): Vienna, Austria, 1986. [Google Scholar]
  10. Cunningham, J.D.; MacNeill, G.; Pollard, D. Chernobyl Its Effect on Ireland (INIS-mf--11216); Nuclear Energy Board: Dublin, Alemania, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  11. Wróbel, P. Chernobyl in Mexico, the Radioactive Cloud Reaches Through the Sea; Conference Paper. May 2016; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: Mexico City, Mexico, 2016; 7p. [Google Scholar]
  12. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Norma Técnica No. 316. Que Establece los Límites Máximos Permisibles le los Radioistopos de: Sr-90, 1-131, Cs-Total y Pu-239 para Leche Deshidratada de Importación; Secretaria de Salud Distrito Federal: Mexico City, Mexico, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  13. UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation). Ionizing Radiation: Sources and Biological Effects; United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation 1982 Report to the General Assembly, with annexes; United Nations Publications: New York, NY, USA, 1982; 770p. [Google Scholar]
  14. UNSCEAR (United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation). Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation; UNSCEAR 2020/2021 Report Volume I Report to the General Assembly Scientific Annex A: Evaluation of medical exposure to ionizing radiation; United Nations Publications: New York, NY, USA, 2022; 354p. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dunne, J.A.; Martin, P.G.; Yamashiki, Y.; Ang, I.X.Y.; Scott, T.B.; Richards, D.A. Spatial pattern of plutonium and radioceasium contamination released during the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant disaster. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 16799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Wan Mahmood, Z.U.; Yii, M.W.; Khalid, M.A.; Yusof, M.A.W.; Mohamed, N. Marine radioactivity of Cs-134 and Cs-137 in the Malaysian Economic Exclusive Zone after the Fukushima accident. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2018, 318, 2165–2172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Aoyama, M. Long-range transport of radiocaesium derived from global fallout and the Fukushima accident in the Pacific Ocean since 1953 through 2017—Part I: Source term and surface transport. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2018, 318, 1519–1542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Brimo, K.; Gonze, M.A.; Pourcelot, L. Long term decrease of 137Cs bioavailability in French pastures: Results from 25 years of monitoring. J. Environ. Radioact. 2019, 208–209, 106029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Chao, J.-H.; Tseng, C.-L. Determination of 135Cs by neutron activation analysis. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 1996, 372, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Qiao, J.; Hansen, V.; Hou, X.; Aldahan, A.; Possnert, G. Speciation analysis of 129I, 137Cs, 232Th, 238U, 239Pu and 240Pu in environmental soil and sediment. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2012, 70, 1698–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zok, D.; Blenke, T.; Reinhard, S.; Sprott, S.; Kegler, F.; Syrbe, L.; Querfeld, R.; Takagai, Y.; Drozdov, V.; Chyzhevskyi, I.; et al. Determination of Characteristic vs Anomalous 135Cs/137Cs Isotopic Ratios in Radioactively Contaminated Environmental Samples. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021, 55, 4984–4991. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. FAO/IAEA (Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations). Use of 137Cs for Soil Erosion Assessment; Fulajtar, E., Mabit, L., Renschler, C.S., Lee Zhi Yi, A., Eds.; FAO/IAEA: Rome, Italy, 2017; 64p. [Google Scholar]
  23. Dicen, G.; Guillevic, F.; Gupta, S.; Chaboche, P.-A.; Meusburger, K.; Sabatier, P.; Evrard, O.; Alewell, C. Distribution and sources of fallout 137Cs and 239+240Pu in equatorial and Southern Hemisphere reference soils. Earth Syst. Sci. Data 2025, 17, 1529–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Garay, A.; Míreles, F.; Quirino, L.L.; Dávila, J.I.; Rios, C.; Lugo, J.F.; Soriano, J.M.; Angoli, A. Radiactividad Gamma Natural y del 137Cs en Suelo del Municipio de Chimaltitán, Jalisco, México. In Proceedings of the Energía Nuclear y Seguridad Radiológica: Nuevos Retos y Perspectivas XIV Congreso Anual de la SNM/XXI Reunión Anual de la SMSR Guadalajara, Jalisco, México, 10–13 September 2003. Memorias en CDROM. [Google Scholar]
  25. Hernández, R.L. Estudio de la Distribución de 137Cs en Suelos de Zacatecas. Master’s Thesis, Unidad Académica de Estudios Nucleares, Universidad Autónoma de Zacatecas “Francisco García Salinas”, Zacatecas, Mexico, October 2018; 60p. [Google Scholar]
  26. WebGIS. Geographic Information Systems Resources. Available online: http://www.webgis.com/srtm3.html (accessed on 24 April 2024).
  27. Portal de Geoinformación 2025. Sistema Nacional de Información sobre Biodiversidad (SNIB). Available online: http://www.conabio.gob.mx/informacion/gis/ (accessed on 17 January 2025).
  28. Hernandez-Mendez, B.; Angeles-Carranza, A.; Suarez-Contreras, S.; Quintero Ponce, E.; Barcenas Robles, M.; Sanchez Meza, J.C.; Gutierrez Segura, E.E.; Balcazar, M. Natural radionuclides baseline in soil at unconventional oil fields in Mexico. Radiat. Prot. Dosim. 2025, 201, 247–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. ANSI N42.14-1999; American National Standard for Calibration and Use of Germanium Spectrometers for the Measurement of Gamma-Ray Emission Rates of Radionuclides. Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1999.
  30. OPPD (Omaha Public Power District). Evaluation of Cs-137 Global Fallout in Soils at Fort Calhoun Station; FC-18-003 Revision 1; EEUU: Washington, NE, USA, 2018; p. 15. [Google Scholar]
  31. Yasumiishi, M.; Nishimura, T.; Aldstadt, J.; Bennett, S.J.; Bittner, T. Assessing the effect of topography on Cs-137 concentrations within forested soils due to the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident, Japan. Earth Surf. Dyn. 2021, 9, 861–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Linnik, V.G.; Saveliev, A.A.; Govorun, A.P.; Ivanitsky, O.M.; Sokolov, A.V. Spatial Variability and Topographic Factors of 137Cs Soil Contamination at a Field Scale. Int. J. Ecol. Dev. Fall 2007, 8, F07. [Google Scholar]
  33. Linnik, V.; Sokolov, A.; Saveliev, A. Patterns and dynamics of Cs-137 soil contamination on the plot scale of the Bryansk Region (Russia): The role of processes, connectivity. Geophys. Res. Abstr. 2014, 16, 5200. [Google Scholar]
  34. Koarashi, J.; Atarashi-Andoh, M.; Takeuchi, E.; Nishimura, S. Topographic heterogeneity effect on the accumulation of Fukushima-derived radiocesium on forest floor driven by biologically mediated processes. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4, 6853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Ismail, M.; Zia, M.A.; Khan, H.M.  Investigation of Cs-137 in the environmental soil segments of the Peshawar and Nowshera districts of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Int. J. Radiat. Res. 2017, 15, 407–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Łokas, E.; Zwoliński, Z.; Rachlewicz, G.; Gąsiorek, M.; Wilkosz, G.; Samolej, K. Distribution of anthropogenic and naturally occurring radionuclides in soils and lakes of Central Spitsbergen (Arctic). J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2017, 311, 707–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Study site location showing contour lines (shown in black), water intermittent streams (light blue lines) and sampling points (blue points). (a) Four points are at 1.1 km to 5.8 km, away from the undisturbed site with initially suspected pedestrian circulation. (b) The location of most of sampling points is near the water intermittent streams that run from southeast towards north (see the light blue arrows).
Figure 1. Study site location showing contour lines (shown in black), water intermittent streams (light blue lines) and sampling points (blue points). (a) Four points are at 1.1 km to 5.8 km, away from the undisturbed site with initially suspected pedestrian circulation. (b) The location of most of sampling points is near the water intermittent streams that run from southeast towards north (see the light blue arrows).
Applsci 15 09982 g001
Figure 2. Constructed 137Cs decay curve (shown in red) from nuclear global tests. Black arrows show local 137Cs contributions from two Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents.
Figure 2. Constructed 137Cs decay curve (shown in red) from nuclear global tests. Black arrows show local 137Cs contributions from two Chernobyl and Fukushima accidents.
Applsci 15 09982 g002
Figure 3. 137Cs activity concentration (blue bars) for four sampling points 4U, 13U, 2D and 12D; all corresponding 137Cs theoretical decay curves (blue triangles) are extrapolated for Chernobyl accident. Thick blue bars on those four points show 137Cs contribution from Fukushima accident. Decay curves comparisons for Canada and USA are shown in red, whereas those for Jalisco and Zacatecas are shown as blue rhombic and blue squares, respectively.
Figure 3. 137Cs activity concentration (blue bars) for four sampling points 4U, 13U, 2D and 12D; all corresponding 137Cs theoretical decay curves (blue triangles) are extrapolated for Chernobyl accident. Thick blue bars on those four points show 137Cs contribution from Fukushima accident. Decay curves comparisons for Canada and USA are shown in red, whereas those for Jalisco and Zacatecas are shown as blue rhombic and blue squares, respectively.
Applsci 15 09982 g003
Figure 4. Distribution of 137Cs activity concentration for year 2011, year with the higher 137Cs distribution from weapon tests and Chernobyl, before Fukushima 137Cs contribution. Several points have higher activity concentration close to intermittent water stream running from southeast to north to lower elevation area.
Figure 4. Distribution of 137Cs activity concentration for year 2011, year with the higher 137Cs distribution from weapon tests and Chernobyl, before Fukushima 137Cs contribution. Several points have higher activity concentration close to intermittent water stream running from southeast to north to lower elevation area.
Applsci 15 09982 g004
Figure 5. 137Cs activity concentration distribution for years 2011, 2013 (Fukushima contribution) and 2022. Red line guides the eye for higher 137Cs activity distribution, whereas green line does the same for lower 137Cs activity distribution. Activity reduction follows intermittent water stream direction from higher altitude to lower.
Figure 5. 137Cs activity concentration distribution for years 2011, 2013 (Fukushima contribution) and 2022. Red line guides the eye for higher 137Cs activity distribution, whereas green line does the same for lower 137Cs activity distribution. Activity reduction follows intermittent water stream direction from higher altitude to lower.
Applsci 15 09982 g005
Table 1. 137Cs emissions from nuclear weapon tests, accidents and reprocessing plants.
Table 1. 137Cs emissions from nuclear weapon tests, accidents and reprocessing plants.
SourceYearsPBqReferences
Nuclear weapon tests (world deposition)1945–1993948UNSCEAR, 2000 [3]
Chernobyl accident (local emission)198670UNSCEAR, 1993 [4]
Reprocessing plants (local emission)1950–199742UNSCEAR, 2000 [3]
Fukushima Daiichi accident (local emission)201111UNSCEAR, 2013 [5]
Table 2. Average annual 137Cs activity concentration.
Table 2. Average annual 137Cs activity concentration.
YEAR
Point2010201120122013201420152016201720182019202020212022
Bq kg−1
4U13.587.114.7135.517.517.187.9LILILILI12.229.3
13U80.229.666.252.228.288.2LILILILILILI46.4
2D13.027.69.216.612.715.764.513.316.614.51.723.115.1
12D43.341.837.530.331.926.4LI45.650.376.727.918.129.7
11D39.832.130.427.934.226.7LILILILI10.723.030.1
10D68.149.548.331.945.038.5LILILILILI2.942.5
117.218.110.712.119.520.312.8LILILI5.811.26.8
36.525.04.13.55.22.54.17.24.18.2LI7.66.2
5.518.20.61.2LILI13.19.62.93.72.53.82.2
611.03.27.26.312.07.11.71.10.76.91.716.46.5
71.85.92.12.29.71.61.5LILILI1.71.91.2
87.517.55.58.410.39.7LILILILI2.64.61.8
95.65.42.73.510.49.5LI4.64.811.910.57.614.9
145.42.11.71.61.21.71.4LILILILILI0.8
151.6LI0.80.70.90.72.73.51.00.8LILI1.3
161.12.10.90.71.51.7LI13.5LILILILILI
17LI1.24.53.01.41.51.61.90.9LILI1.8LI
Errors in measurements are around 10% for two digits figures and around 50% for one digit figure. LI means lack of information.
Table 3. 137Cs activity concentration in soil in Mexico, USA and Canada.
Table 3. 137Cs activity concentration in soil in Mexico, USA and Canada.
Other SitesThis Study
PlaceReference137Cs
Bq kg−1
Out points from undisturbed site137Cs
Bq kg−1
Zacatecas, Mexico. (Hernández, 2018) [25]0.49–5.151.0 km south0.8–5.4
Jalisco, Mexico. (Garay et al., 2003) [24]0.5–20.45.8 km southeast0.7–4.3
Canada.(Blagoeva, Zikovsky, 1995) [6]0.2–2122.0 km southeast0.6–13.5
USA. (OPPD, 2018) [30]11.1–1111.7 km northwest0.8–6.9
Table 4. Main characteristics of the calculated 137Cs decay curves for point 4U, 13U, 2D and 12D.
Table 4. Main characteristics of the calculated 137Cs decay curves for point 4U, 13U, 2D and 12D.
Data PointIntersection at Year 1986 Normalize Point Year 2012137Cs peak Contribution from Fukushima Accident
Bq kg−1Bq kg−1Year PeakBq kg−1
4U67.0 29.32013135.5 ± 14.5
13U108.746.4201588.2 ± 5.5
2D35.3 15.1201664.5 ± 1.7
12D69.529.7201976.7 ± 2.7
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Suárez-Contreras, S.; Sánchez-Mendieta, V.; Hernández-Méndez, B.; Sánchez-Meza, J.C.; Balcázar, M. Thirteen-Year Cesium-137 Distribution Environmental Analysis in an Undisturbed Area. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 9982. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189982

AMA Style

Suárez-Contreras S, Sánchez-Mendieta V, Hernández-Méndez B, Sánchez-Meza JC, Balcázar M. Thirteen-Year Cesium-137 Distribution Environmental Analysis in an Undisturbed Area. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(18):9982. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189982

Chicago/Turabian Style

Suárez-Contreras, Sergio, Víctor Sánchez-Mendieta, Beatriz Hernández-Méndez, Juan Carlos Sánchez-Meza, and Miguel Balcázar. 2025. "Thirteen-Year Cesium-137 Distribution Environmental Analysis in an Undisturbed Area" Applied Sciences 15, no. 18: 9982. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189982

APA Style

Suárez-Contreras, S., Sánchez-Mendieta, V., Hernández-Méndez, B., Sánchez-Meza, J. C., & Balcázar, M. (2025). Thirteen-Year Cesium-137 Distribution Environmental Analysis in an Undisturbed Area. Applied Sciences, 15(18), 9982. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15189982

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop