Next Article in Journal
Summarizing Recent Developments on Autism Spectrum Disorder Detection and Classification Through Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Mortars Activated with Alternative Steel-Compatible Salts: Impact on Chloride Diffusion and Durability
Previous Article in Special Issue
Innovative Approaches in Sensory Food Science: From Digital Tools to Virtual Reality
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Perspective

Tailoring In-Flight Food Consumption to Alleviate Fear of Flying Through Sensory Stimulation

by
Francesco Sansone
1,†,
Francesca Gorini
1,†,
Alessandro Tonacci
1,* and
Francesca Venturi
2,3
1
Institute of Clinical Physiology, National Research Council of Italy (IFC-CNR), I-56124 Pisa, Italy
2
Interdepartmental Research Centre “Nutraceuticals and Food for Health”, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
3
Department of Agriculture, Food and Environment, University of Pisa, Via del Borghetto 80, I-56124 Pisa, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(14), 8057; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148057
Submission received: 14 June 2025 / Revised: 2 July 2025 / Accepted: 18 July 2025 / Published: 19 July 2025

Abstract

Nowadays, society is becoming increasingly committed to traveling by plane for work, tourism, and leisure in general. However, either due to internal, specific factors or to external determinants, like terrorism and climate changes, a growing number of travelers have experienced the so-called fear of flying, a persistent, irrational fear of flight-related situations for which a clear, efficacious therapy does not yet exist. Based on the usual interaction with the surrounding environment, conducted by means of the five human senses, and particularly on the neurophysiological pathway followed by the chemical senses, in this study, we revise the findings in the related literature on the topic, proposing an alternative way to alleviate the anxiety related to the fear of flight. This is based on chemosensory stimulation being applied directly during a flight and is possibly concerned with the consumption of meals, an usual activity performed onboard. After an introductory section aimed at understanding the problem, we present some studies related to chemosensory perception during the flight, highlighting the specificities of the scenarios, followed by a description of findings related to the meals proposed by flight companies in this context, and finally wrapping up the possible alternative approaches that could be conducted by such providers to alleviate the fear of flying condition through chemosensory stimulation vehiculated by meals, and enhance the quality of flight experience related to food consumption onboard.

1. Introduction

Fear of flying (FF), also known as aviophobia, is classified as a specific situational-type phobia in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), versions DSM-IV-TR, DSM-5, and DSM-5-TR [1]. It is characterized by a persistent, irrational fear of airplanes or flight-related situations, which are typically avoided or endured with intense psychological distress. The manifestations of FF vary widely, ranging from anxiety during specific moments of the flight—such as take-off or turbulence—to anticipatory anxiety, such as insomnia in the days preceding travel, and persistent physical symptoms of anxiety throughout the flight [2].
Although the exact pathogenesis of FF remains unclear, evidence suggests that individuals with high trait anxiety sensitivity are more prone to developing this condition [3]. Additionally, self-perceptual alterations occurring at altitudes above 2500 m can precipitate panic attacks in susceptible individuals [4]. Neurobiological studies further suggest that dysregulation in serotonergic pathways and atypical frontal lobe activity may contribute to generalized anxiety, and FF in particular [5,6,7,8].
Epidemiological data indicate that up to 40% of individuals in industrialized countries experience some degree of FF [9,10]. Common coping strategies include the use of alcohol or anxiolytic medications [11], which often have adverse medical and social consequences. More recently, personalized exposure therapy and cognitive–behavioral interventions have shown promising outcomes [12]. Technological innovations, such as virtual reality (VR), are also being increasingly frequently employed to simulate flight experiences and reduce anxiety through controlled exposure [13].
In addition, as widely reported in the literature [14,15], food sensory attributes, such as appearance, odor, taste, texture, and flavor, are key triggers of emotional responses [16,17]. These emotions may relate to enjoyment, preferences, or consumption itself [17]. Due to its sensory nature, past experiences, and expected outcomes, food represents a particularly complex emotional stimulus [18,19].
Beyond psychological and behavioral interventions, certain olfactory stimuli have been shown to reduce stress, enhance mood, and improve cognitive performance, even following stressful events [20,21,22,23,24]. The chemosensory system, and particularly olfaction, is closely connected to emotion-related brain regions including the amygdala, insula, orbitofrontal cortex, and cingulate cortex [25,26].
Activation of the amygdala is stronger in response to olfactory stimuli compared to auditory or visual cues [27]. Scents are particularly effective in evoking autobiographical memories, often more so than visual or other sensory modalities [28,29]. Repetitive, intense, and novel odors are especially likely to form emotional odor–event associations, a phenomenon commonly observed in childhood due to the greater frequency of meaningful and novel experiences occurring during this period [30]. In line with the Proustian hypothesis [14], odor-evoked memories tend to be more emotional [30], contain more event-specific details [29], and elicit a stronger sense of mental time travel [31] than those triggered by visual cues [32].
Olfactory dysfunction has been linked to mood disturbances and diminished well-being, as observed during the COVID-19 pandemic [33]. However, the systematic integration of scent delivery into technologies like VR remains in its infancy, and methodological improvements are necessary to enhance scalability and efficacy [34]. Nonetheless, aromatherapy is widely applied in contexts requiring emotional or cognitive relief, owing to its ease of use and minimal constraints [35,36,37].
Taste, much like smell, is a chemically driven sense with emotional and cognitive implications. Its processing overlaps with olfaction, and the full perception of flavor is inherently dependent on the sense of smell [38,39]. The interplay between taste and olfaction forms the foundation of food perception and is central to consumer science, where increasing attention is paid to tailoring food experiences to individual preferences and emotional states [40].
On the other hand, certain types of food consumption can directly evoke nostalgia, a phenomenon known as food nostalgia. This occurs when individuals consume foods associated with personal memories, often resulting in stronger positive emotional responses [41]. A qualitative exploratory study identified the following six key themes linked to nostalgic food experiences: childhood, yearning, substitution, homesickness, special occasions, and rediscovery [41].
Food-evoked nostalgia may help explain why individuals often seek familiar foods for comfort and emotional support during challenging times [42,43], and this should be further investigated as a potential therapeutic tool, including for addressing and reducing FF.
This perspective dives deep into the potential of chemosensory science in the framework of in-flight experience, where it is not uncommon, especially with more traditional airlines, for passengers to take advantage of the possibility to consume meals onboard the aircraft. In this particular sensory environment, where perception is markedly altered, based on distinct studies in the literature, and leveraging advances in sensory science and technology, we propose new strategies to make the meal consumption experience more user-friendly for passengers, eventually also supporting them to overcome or mitigate potential issues related to the FF condition.

2. Chemosensory Perception During Flights: Particularities of the Framework

Traveling is one of the main activities in our daily lives. Human beings travel for work, healthcare reasons, shopping, amusement, and so forth, with different vectors depending on the purpose (and distance) they are traveling for. Specifically, when it comes to passenger transportation, a growing interest is paid from the customer to the experiential quality of the journey rather than only the final destination and costs [44], and this is expected to further increase in the near-future, with travel packages becoming increasingly tailored to the specific needs of the customer not only by offering competitive time/cost alternatives, but also adapting to the emotional expectations of the traveler.
In such a framework, the amount of stress associated with air travel should be considered, caused by both environmental (dry cabin air, lowered cabin air pressure, vibration, background noise) and external (terrorism, viruses, accidents) insights, and possibly associated with customer satisfaction and travel choices. To this particular scenario, the role of the five human senses, and particularly of the two chemical senses, smell and taste, becomes highly relevant to ensure proper enjoyment of the flight experience; therefore, the tendency towards a real “sensehacking” becomes more and more popular, which is defined as the use of our senses, and sensory stimulation, in order to more intelligently help to improve our social, cognitive, and emotional well-being, in the relevant framework [45].
As said, emotions are conveyed to human beings through their senses, and chemical senses play an especially essential role in enabling significant sensory experiences. However, it is widely known that sensory perceptions are largely modified by the scenario in which human being is immersed. For example, it is well known that during space missions, due to microgravity, which induces physiological changes due to a shift of body fluids towards the head, the olfactory components activated during food consumption are diminished, leading to a modification in the flavor of food. Other phenomena affecting the chemical senses take place, such as space sickness, stress, radiation exposure, and psychological factors [46,47].
For air passengers, it is well known that the limited space inside an aircraft and the ventilation systems commonly employed in modern planes make it difficult for a given airborne compound to dissipate, causing olfactory fatigue and habituation [48,49]. Also, pressure variations in the cabin with respect to the pressure at the ground significantly modify the perception of a given compound, mainly modulating the absolute olfactory threshold, especially near the absolute perception threshold level [50,51].
Similarly, concerning taste, air passengers experience a variation in their sensory perception, due to several factors, including the following: (i) air pressure that, when decreased, continues to decrease taste buds’ sensitivity, requiring an increase in salt, sugar and herbs, and a reduction in sour taste, to produce a taste which is similar to the usual ones consumed on the ground [50,52]; (ii) drop in humidity, which alters the sense of taste by drying out nasal passages and mouth [51]; (iii) psychological reasons, similar to those mentioned above for the sense of smell, that may further alter the production of saliva, in turn increasing the magnitude of the problem [53]. Furthermore, it has been observed that the role of engine noise is not negligible for sensory processing of food. In particular, loud noise appears to impair the perception of sweet and salty meals, at the same time enhancing the perception of umami flavor [54,55], whose phenomenon can be used as a transformational device to facilitate palatable meals without boosting salt usage, which is deleterious for human health.
However, under such conditions, it is then necessary to hypothesize a strategy to improve the perceived quality of food served during a flight, ultimately scaling up the user experience during the journey.

3. In-Flight Meals: State of the Art and Proposals for Enhancing the Customer Experience

3.1. In-Flight Meals: What We Know So Far

Nowadays, it is a common belief that passengers’ expectations towards aircraft food are low, as demonstrated by the amount of food and beverages purchased at ground level in various parts of the globe [56,57]. Indeed, airline food is considered to be the poorest aspect about flying for a significant percentage of customers [58], even if contradictory results appear when spotting no difference between the judgment around a meal served at ground and the same meal proposed during the flight; however, this may involve a possible methodological bias concerning the personal attitude of the probands and their age [59]. However, it is important to notice that, according to the Easyjet 2070 Future Travel Report, 19% of common travelers would love to experience 3D-printed hotel buffet food serving up breakfast, lunch and dinner, even on planes, to improve their multisensory flight experience, further highlighting the need for a proper menu and meal preparation for flight situations [60], and also demonstrating the importance of the presentation environment concerning personal judgment about the quality of served food [61].
This aligns with previous research, finding somewhat of an impact of passenger attachment to in-flight food and beverages on the willingness to fly again with the same flight company [62,63]. Another study demonstrated that the quality of food served onboard is among the most important factors for judging the quality of airline services regardless of the traveling class, not distinguishing between passengers in prestige- or economy-class [64]. In this context, few airlines have collaborated with food and beverage companies to formulate edible compounds suitable for consumption at a high altitude. One of the first structured attempts in this sense was played by a Danish beer company, Mikkeller, providing special flying beers to the SAS Scandinavian Airlines [65], later followed by the Hong Kong-based Cathay Pacific Airways, which produced a beer containing honey and dragon eye fruit, tasting like lychee, to counterbalance the effects on chemical senses due to high altitude, low pressure, and background noise [66]. The large use of fruity aromas can help enhance the perceived sweetness at the aircraft without significantly altering the sugar content; therefore, the healthiness of the proposed product is not dramatically affected.
Tea is traditionally associated with the British food and beverage tradition. In this sense, British Airways, the UK-based air company, promoted a collaboration with the popular tea brand Twinings to develop a special tea designed for consumption during flights [67], which is a blend of Assam, Kenyan, and high-grown Ceylon tea, combining a multisensory experience featuring body, strength, flavor, and color.
The modified sensory perception in the sky is also the key to the success of some alcoholic drinks, like wines. For example, it was observed that sweet, fruity red wines, like Pinot Noir, Rioja, or Malbec, are preferred by travelers over their acidic-tasting counterparts, due to the physiological reasons mentioned above [50,68,69,70].
Other airlines have stressed their research towards relaxing and healthy foods. For example, Monarch Airlines, a former British low-cost airline, after a self-commissioned research finding that 72% of British travelers find traveling stressful, has developed the “Mood Food” box, featuring echinacea and liquorice ice-cream to boost immunity; green tea and lavender cakes to promote relaxation, also promoting the chew effect, that are known for its anti-stressful properties [71]; and herbal tea to reduce bloating symptoms [72].

3.2. Proposals for the “Food of the Future” for Airlines: Sensory Science and the Need to Fight the Fear of Flying

When considering the enhancement of the consumer experience in the framework of nutrition, which is ultimately related to the improvement of the well-being situation of the aircraft passengers also in relationship with the FF, it is essential to take into account that traditional consumer preference measures, such as those expressed through sensory questionnaires and involving traditional measures, like hedonic ratings, fail to predict consumer behavior and choices. In fact, while it has been described that explicit appreciation can provide useful information about the immediate pleasure derived from an edible compound, it does not offer insights about the underlying decision-making processes, and is often characterized by a self-judgment bias, which is especially present in more experienced consumers.
Overall, it is widely known that to fully understand the consumer experience, it is necessary to go beyond the perceived sensory characteristics of a compound and the eventual pleasure derived from the interaction with it and its consumption. However, the relationship between the consumer and the product (in this case, the foodstuff), should also be considered, as well as the overall emotional response of the consumer. In such a framework, such as for the promotion of palatable food during flights, it is essential to take food familiarity for a given passenger or group of flyers into account. Familiarity is, indeed, one feature of a sensory stimulation that enhances the psychophysiological sense of pleasantness and relaxation, as demonstrated in multiple studies [73,74]. It is also among the main determinants of success for traveling food, especially by plane [75], with an enhanced perception of healthiness for compounds which are more familiar to the consumer. In this light, the administration of a questionnaire, through the flight carrier application, to passengers can help in identifying familiar tastes and supporting the provision of the most pleasant onboard user experience, always taking into account that familiarity alone does not necessarily reflect personal choice towards a product. This principle would promote the personalization of the menu as much as possible, always taking into account the economic and logistic constraints the flight carrier would encounter in this regard. In any case, this approach has been put already into place by Air France through its frequent flyer programs for first-class passengers [76], which has received positive feedback.
Another proposal to enhance the customer experience related to food, decreasing annoyances onboard for passengers, is represented by the effects of the surrounding environment. The influence of air pressure and sound on self-perception of wellness in the aircraft has already been discussed. Several companies usually propose that their passengers put on earphones to decrease their annoyance due to the engine noise spreading into the cabin [77]; however, through these earphones, sounds could be delivered to the passenger, enhancing the taste of the airline food or improving their overall experience, as has already been demonstrated in different scenarios [78]. The audio tracks used can include the combination of complementary music and food, or even environmental sounds related to food, to enhance the sensory features of edible compounds [79]. The latter approach of these has been followed by some companies, including Finnair [76,80,81], in a successful manner.
The monitoring of passengers’ well-being during flights, which is also related to food, can be performed using wearable sensors, even with very user-friendly approaches, featuring solutions purposely scaled for enhancing wearability and reducing annoyance, like smartwatches and smartbands, which, when properly tailored and merged with artificial intelligence models, can provide the customer with useful information around their health and well-being state [82], even during flights or tasting. This takes particular importance when we consider that products with similar (explicit) hedonic ratings are associated with significantly different emotional responses [40,83] that can be captured only by means of psychophysiological measurements, transcending the typical approaches used in sensory analysis.
Figure 1 resumes all the three approaches mentioned above in a graphical manner, whereas a more detailed explanation of a possible intervention strategy is depicted in Figure 2.

4. Conclusions

Fear of flying remains a prevalent and often under-addressed challenge for travelers. Chemosensory stimulation during flights could offer a promising, low-risk complement to existing psychological therapies. By tailoring olfactory and gustatory experiences to the unique constraints of the in-flight environment, airlines can not only elevate passenger satisfaction, but also contribute meaningfully to anxiety reduction. At the same time, the promotion of certain types of foods could decrease the typical unhealthy behaviors of travelers, particularly those with a high degree of anxiety that, as reported at the beginning of the study, are more likely to dangerously consume alcohol and medicines, putting themselves at further risk concerning their health.
To the best of our knowledge, airlines do not currently collect data profiling passengers’ food intake and health status. However, a comprehensive strategy to counteract FF by promoting positive moods through food consumption could be more effective if such data were integrated. To this end, airlines could design specific questionnaires accompanied by informative brochures to be provided to passengers affected by FF, either at the time of ticket booking or during check-in procedures. These materials could recommend specific meals and/or beverages to be consumed during flights to help reduce anxiety.
Furthermore, brief mindfulness practices have been shown to enhance the sensory experience of food while reducing calorie intake [84], suggesting their potential when combined with foods evoking nostalgia, as well as positive moods, to enhance psychological benefits during flight time, regardless of passengers’ classes.
Future research should focus on the empirical validation of these strategies and their integration into broader wellness-focused travel initiatives.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T. and F.V.; methodology, F.G.; software, F.S.; validation, F.S., F.G., A.T. and F.V.; formal analysis, A.T. and F.V.; investigation, A.T. and F.V.; resources, A.T.; data curation, A.T. and F.V.; writing—original draft preparation, F.S., F.G., A.T. and F.V.; writing—review and editing, F.S., F.G., A.T. and F.V.; visualization, F.S. and F.G.; supervision, A.T. and F.V.; project administration, A.T. and F.V.; funding acquisition, A.T. and F.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Italian National Research Council project FOE 2021 DBA.AD005.225 “NUTRAGE”.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. APA Dictionary of Psychology. Available online: https://dictionary.apa.org/fear-of-flying (accessed on 10 February 2025).
  2. Flasbeck, V.; Engelmann, J.; Klostermann, B.; Juckel, G.; Mavrogiorgou, P. Relationships between fear of flying, loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials and frontal alpha asymmetry. J. Psychiatr. Res. 2023, 159, 145–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Vanden Bogaerde, A.; De Raedt, R. The moderational role of anxiety sensitivity in flight phobia. J. Anxiety Disord. 2011, 25, 422–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Clark, D.M. Anxiety disorders: Why they persist and how to treat them. Behav. Res. Ther. 1999, 37, S5–S27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Juckel, G.; Pogarell, O.; Augustin, H.; Mulert, C.; Müller-Siecheneder, F.; Frodl, T.; Mavrogiorgou, P.; Hegerl, U. Differential prediction of first clinical response to serotonergic and noradrenergic antidepressants using the loudness dependence of au-ditory evoked potentials in patients with major depressive disorder. J. Clin. Psychiatry 2007, 68, 1206–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Jakobsen, J.C.; Katakam, K.K.; Schou, A.; Hellmuth, S.G.; Stallknecht, S.E.; Leth-Møller, K.; Iversen, M.; Banke, M.B.; Petersen, I.J.; Klingenberg, S.L.; et al. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder. A systematic review with meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2017, 17, 58, Erratum in BMC Psychiatry 2017, 17, 162. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1311-5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Toscano, M.; Viganò, A.; Puledda, F.; Verzina, A.; Rocco, A.; Lenzi, G.L.; Di Piero, V. Serotonergic correlation with anger and aggressive behavior in acute stroke patients: An intensity dependence of auditory evoked potentials (IDAP) study. Eur. Neurol. 2014, 72, 186–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Vidaurre, C.; Nikulin, V.V.; Herrojo Ruiz, M. Identification of spatial patterns with maximum association between power of resting state neural oscillations and trait anxiety. Neural Comput. Appl. 2023, 35, 5737–5749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Clark, G.I.; Rock, A.J. Processes Contributing to the Maintenance of Flying Phobia: A Narrative Review. Front Psychol. 2016, 7, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Laker, M.K.; Bob, P.; Riethof, N.; Raboch, J. Fear of Flying, Stress and Epileptic-Like Symptoms. Neuropsychiatr. Dis Treat. 2024, 20, 777–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Klein, R.A. Virtual reality exposure therapy (fear of flying): From a private practice perspective. CyberPsychol. Behav. 1998, 1, 311–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Triscari, M.T.; Faraci, P.; Catalisano, D.; D’Angelo, V.; Urso, V. Effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy integrated with systematic desensitization, cognitive behavioral therapy com-bined with eye movement desensitization and reprocessing therapy, and cognitive behavioral therapy combined with virtual reality exposure therapy methods in the treatment of flight anxiety: A randomized trial. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2015, 11, 2591–2598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Rus-Calafell, M.; Gutiérrez-Maldonado, J.; Botella, C.; Baños, R.M. Virtual reality exposure and imaginal exposure in the treatment of fear of flying: A pilot study. Behav Modific. 2013, 37, 568–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Green, J.D.; Reid, C.A.; Kneuer, M.A.; Hedgebeth, M.V. The proust effect: Scents, food, and nostalgia. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 2023, 50, 101562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Costa, E.; Niimi, J.; Collier, E.S. The relationship between food neophobia and hedonic ratings of novel foods may be mediated by emotional arousal. Food Qual. Preference 2023, 109, 104931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lagast, S.; Gellynck, X.; Schouteten, J.J.; De Herdt, V.; De Steur, H. Consumers’ emotions elicited by food: A systematic review of explicit and implicit methods. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 69, 172–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Spinelli, S.; Jaeger, S.R. What do we know about the sensory drivers of emotions in foods and beverages? Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2019, 27, 82–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Desmet, P.M.; Schifferstein, H.N. Sources of positive and negative emotions in food experience. Appetite 2008, 50, 290–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Köster, E.P.; Mojet, J. From mood to food and from food to mood: A psychological perspective on the measurement of food-related emotions in consumer research. Food Res. Int. 2015, 76, 180–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moss, M.; Hewitt, S.; Moss, L.; Wesnes, K. Modulation of cognitive performance and mood by aromas of peppermint and ylang-ylang. Int. J. Neurosci. 2008, 118, 59–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Schifferstein, H.N.J.; Smeets, M.A.M.; Hallensleben, R. Stimulus sets can induce shifts in descriptor meanings in product evaluation tasks. Acta Psychol. 2011, 138, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Naziz, P.S.; Das, R.; Sen, S. The Scent of Stress: Evidence From the Unique Fragrance of Agarwood. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lin, Z.; Kunze, K.; Ueki, A.; Inakage, M. Aromacue-a scent toolkit to cope with stress using the 4-7-8 breathing method. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 9–12 February 2020; pp. 265–272. [Google Scholar]
  24. Zhou, C.; Shutoh, F.; Komada, H.; Yamanaka, T. Effects of scent and music on moods and stress in the confined resting area. Int. J. Affect. Eng. 2020, 19, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Gottfried, J.A.; Deichmann, R.; Winston, J.S.; Dolan, R.J. Functional heterogeneity in human olfactory cortex: An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 10819–10828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gottfried, J.A.; O’Doherty, J.; Dolan, R.J. Appetitive and aversive olfactory learning in humans studied using event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging. J. Neurosci. 2002, 22, 10829–10837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Royet, J.P.; Zald, D.; Versace, R.; Costes, N.; Lavenne, F.; Koenig, O.; Gervais, R. Emotional responses to pleasant and unpleasant olfactory, visual, and auditory stimuli: A positron emission tomography study. J. Neurosci. 2000, 20, 7752–7759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Chu, S.; Downes, J.J. Odour-evoked autobiographical memories: Psychological investigations of Proustian phenomena. Chem. Senses 2000, 25, 111–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Chu, S.; Downes, J.J. Proust nose best: Odors are better cues of autobiographical memory. Mem. Cogn. 2002, 30, 511–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Herz, R.S.; Schooler, J.W. A naturalistic study of autobiographical memories evoked by olfactory and visual cues: Testing the Proustian hypothesis. Am. J. Psychol. 2002, 115, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Willander, J.; Larsson, M. Smell your way back to childhood: Autobiographical odor memory. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2006, 13, 240–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Miles, A.N.; Berntsen, D. Odour-induced mental time travel into the past and future: Do odour cues retain a unique link to our distant past? Memory 2011, 19, 930–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Hofer, M.K.; Blume, L.; Turner, B.J.; Schäfer, L.; Croy, I.; Hummel, T. The impact of COVID-19-related smell dysfunction on sexual and mental wellbeing: Data from a longitudinal sample. Biol. Psychol. 2025, 195, 109002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tonacci, A. Chemical senses and consumer technologies: A journey from the human physiology towards the metaverse. In Proceedings of the 2023 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference (ZINC), IEEE, Novi Sad, Serbia, 29–31 May 2023; p. 1. [Google Scholar]
  35. Hedigan, F.; Sheridan, H.; Sasse, A. Benefit of inhalation aromatherapy as a complementary treatment for stress and anxiety in a clinical setting—A systematic review. Complement. Ther. Clin. Pract. 2023, 52, 101750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ebrahimi, H.; Mardani, A.; Basirinezhad, M.H.; Hamidzadeh, A.; Eskandari, F. The effects of Lavender and Chamomile essential oil inhalation aromatherapy on depression, anxiety and stress in older community-dwelling people: A randomized controlled trial. Explore 2022, 18, 272–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Song, H.; Yang, A.; Wang, Y.; Xu, R.; Hu, W. Potential roles of inhalation aromatherapy on stress-induced depression by inhibiting inflammation in the peripheral olfactory system. Neurochem. Int. 2025, 186, 105967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Andrade-Sienz, M.; Knight, J.; Bayram-Weston, Z. The senses 3: Exploring the interrelated senses of smell and taste. Nurs. Times 2022, 118, 12. [Google Scholar]
  39. Rolls, E.T. Taste and smell processing in the brain. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2019, 164, 97–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Low, J.Y.; Janin, N.; Traill, R.M.; Hort, J. The who, what, where, when, why and how of measuring emotional response to food. A systematic review. Food Qual. Preference 2022, 100, 104607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Vignolles, A.; Pichon, P.E. A taste of nostalgia: Links between nostalgia and food consumption. Qual. Mark. Res. Int. J 2014, 17, 225–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Brown, L.; Edwards, J.; Hartwell, H. A taste of the unfamiliar. Understanding the meanings attached to food by international postgraduate students in England. Appetite 2010, 54, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Kohli, R.K.; Connolly, H.; Warman, A. Food and its meaning for asylum seeking children and young people in foster care. Child. Geogr. 2010, 8, 233–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Spence, C. Scent in Motion: On the Multiple Uses of Ambient Scent in the Context of Passenger Transport. Front. Psychol. 2021, 12, 702517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Spence, C. Sensehacking the guest’s multisensory hotel experience. Front. Psychol. 2022, 13, 1014818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Olabi, A.A.; Lawless, H.T.; Hunter, J.B.; Levitsky, D.A.; Halpern, B.P. The effect of microgravity and space flight on the chemical senses. J. Food Sci. 2002, 67, 468–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Taylor, A.J.; Beauchamp, J.D.; Briand, L.; Heer, M.; Hummel, T.; Margot, C.; McGrane, S.; Pieters, S.; Pittia, P.; Spence, C. Factors affecting flavor perception in space: Does the spacecraft environment influence food intake by astronauts? Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2020, 19, 3439–3475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Seppanen, O.A.; Fisk, W.J. Summary of Human Responses to Ventilation. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/64k2p4dc (accessed on 15 February 2025).
  49. Yao, X.; Song, Y.; Vink, P. Effect of scent on comfort of aircraft passengers. Work 2021, 68 (Suppl. S1), S273–S280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Burdack-Freitag, A.; Bullinger, D.; Mayer, F.; Breuer, K. Odor and taste perception at normal and low atmospheric pressure in a simulated aircraft cabin. J. Consum. Prot. Food Saf. 2011, 6, 95–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Kuehn, M.; Welsch, H.; Zahnert, T.; Hummel, T. Changes of pressure and humidity affect olfactory function. Eur. Arch. Oto-Rhino-Laryngol. 2008, 265, 299–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Park, M.Y. The Science of Airplane Food: How Chefs Trick Passenger Palates. 2017. Available online: https://thepointsguy.com/2017/06/the-science-of-airplane-food/ (accessed on 15 February 2025).
  53. Bates, J.F.; Adams, D. The influence of mental stress on the flow of saliva in man. Arch. Oral Biol. 1968, 13, 593–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Woods, A.T.; Poliakoff, E.; Lloyd, D.M.; Kuenzel, J.; Hodson, R.; Gonda, H.; Batchelor, J.; Dijksterhuis, G.B.; Thomas, A. Effect of background noise on food perception. Food Qual. Preference 2011, 22, 42–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Yan, K.S.; Dando, R. A crossmodal role for audition in taste perception. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2015, 41, 590–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Lu, Y. Investigating factors that influence passengers’ shopping intentions at airports: Evidence from Taiwan. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2014, 35, 72–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Diebelius, G. From Restaurant to Runway: Hungry Passengers Can Now Order in-Flight Meals by Phone Thanks to These Food Delivery Apps. 2015. Available online: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-3267457/From-restaurant-runway-Hungry-passengers-order-flight-meals-phone-thanks-food-delivery-apps.html (accessed on 15 February 2025).
  58. Thornhill, T. Would You Dare To Go? The Restaurant Where the Only Thing on the Menu Is Airline Food. 2017. Available online: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/travel_news/article-4443410/The-restaurant-AIRLINE-FOOD-served.html (accessed on 18 July 2025).
  59. Holthuysen, N.T.E.; Vrijhof, M.M.; de Wijk, R.A.; Kremer, S. Welcome on board: Overall liking and just-about-right ratings of airplane meals in three different consumption contexts-laboratory, recreated airplane, and actual airplane. J. Sens. Stud. 2016, 32, e12254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Thornhill, T. ‘Heartbeat’ Passports, Printed Hotel Food and Plane Seats That Adapt To the Body Shape of the Passenger: Scientists Reveal What Travel Will Be Like in the Year 2070. 2023. Available online: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/travel/article-11893983/Heartbeat-passports-3D-printed-buffets-Scientists-reveal-travel-like-2070.html (accessed on 18 July 2025).
  61. Messner, W. The impact of an aircraft’s service environment on perceptions of in-flight food quality. J. Air Transp. Manag. 2016, 53, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Han, H.; Lee, K.-S.; Chua, B.-L.; Lee, S.; Kim, W. Role of airline food quality, price reasonableness, image, satisfaction, and attachment in building re-flying intention. Int. J. Hosp. Manag. 2019, 80, 91–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Lee, J.; Ko, S. Effect of the in-flight meal service quality on the customer value and loyalty. Indian J. Sci. Technol. 2016, 9, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. An, M.; Noh, Y. Airline customer satisfaction and loyalty: Impact of in-flight service quality. Serv. Bus. 2009, 3, 293–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Mikkeller. 2016. Available online: https://www.mikkeller.com/news/20160929the-worlds-highest-altitude-beer-tasting (accessed on 18 July 2025).
  66. de Freytas-Tamura, K. Airlines Aim to Trick Your Taste Buds at 30,000 Feet. 2017. Available online: https://nyti.ms/2lygNdj (accessed on 15 February 2025).
  67. White, G. British Airways and Twinings Launch a High Altitude Tea: British Airways and Twinings Launch a Tea with an Improved Flavour at 35,000 Feet. 2013. Available online: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/newsbysector/transport/9835108/British-Airways-and-Twinings-launch-a-high-altitude-tea.html (accessed on 15 February 2025).
  68. Smith, B. Drinking at 30,000 Feet. 2014. Available online: https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/society/46432/wine-drinking-at-30000-feet (accessed on 15 February 2025).
  69. Tyrer, B. Why Plonk Tastes Posh at 35,000 ft. 2014. Available online: http://www.thesundaytimes.co.uk/sto/travel/Your_Travel/article1410455.ece (accessed on 15 February 2025).
  70. Pace, G. Why Food and Wine Taste Different on Airplanes. 2017. Available online: https://www.townandcountrymag.com/leisure/travel-guide/a9138949/airplane-wine-food/ (accessed on 15 February 2025).
  71. Scholey, A.; Haskell, C.; Robertson, B.; Kennedy, D.; Milne, A.; Wetherell, M. Chewing gum alleviates negative mood and reduces cortisol during acute laboratory psychological stress. Physiol. Behav. 2009, 97, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Perry, J. 2017. Available online: https://www.vml.com/insight/mood-food (accessed on 15 February 2025).
  73. Tonacci, A.; Billeci, L.; Di Mambro, I.; Marangoni, R.; Sanmartin, C.; Venturi, F. Wearable sensors for assessing the role of olfactory training on the autonomic response to olfactory stimulation. Sensors 2021, 21, 770. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Billeci, L.; Sanmartin, C.; Tonacci, A.; Taglieri, I.; Bachi, L.; Ferroni, G.; Braceschi, G.; Odello, L.; Venturi, F. Wearable sensors to evaluate autonomic response to olfactory stimulation: The influence of short, intensive sensory training. Biosensors 2023, 13, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Jang, R.; Lee, W.S.; Moon, J. Relationship between Presentation, Attitude, and In-Flight Meal Food Healthiness: Moderating Role of Familiarity. Foods 2024, 13, 2111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Drake, K. The Airline Industry Is in Trouble. Is Bottomless Caviar the Answer? 2022. Available online: https://www.ft.com/content/018f132b-864d-4c53-8ebf-a5cad8ee4bdb (accessed on 15 February 2025).
  77. Kim, S. The British Airways Solution to Bland Airline Food. 2013. Available online: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/news/The-British-Airways-solution-to-bland-airline-food/ (accessed on 15 February 2025).
  78. Billeci, L.; Sanmartin, C.; Tonacci, A.; Taglieri, I.; Ferroni, G.; Marangoni, R.; Venturi, F. Wearable sensors to measure the influence of sonic seasoning on wine consumers in a live context: A preliminary proof-of-concept study. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2025, 105, 1484–1495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Zampini, M.; Spence, C. The role of auditory cues in modulating the perceived crispness and staleness of potato chips. J. Sens. Stud. 2004, 19, 347–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Franco, L.S.; Shanahan, D.F.; Fuller, R.A. A review of the benefits of nature experiences: More than meets the eye. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2007, 14, 864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Silva, V. Sound palate: Finnair’s “hear the taste” bisensory experience. APEX Exp. Mag. 2019, 10, 43. [Google Scholar]
  82. Venturi, F.; Tonacci, A.; Ascrizzi, R.; Sansone, F.; Conte, R.; Pala, A.P.; Tarabella, A.; Sanmartin, C.; Taglieri, I.; Marangoni, R.; et al. “CANTINA 5.0”—A Novel, Industry 5.0-Based Paradigm Applied to the Winemaking Industry in Italy. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 4777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Meiselman, H.L. The (gradual) development of emotion measurement for food. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 2021, 40, 187–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Arch, J.J.; Brown, K.W.; Goodman, R.J.; Della Porta, M.D.; Kiken, L.G.; Tillman, S. Enjoying food without caloric cost: The impact of brief mindfulness on laboratory eating outcomes. Behav. Res. Ther. 2016, 79, 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Three possible scenarios related to food to fight the fear of flight onboard: (a) the selection of familiar foods and beverages through an app; (b) the presentation of foods in a multisensory-favorable fashion; (c) the monitoring of well-being during flights during food consumption. (Image generated using the Microsoft 365 Copilot AI tool, https://copilot.microsoft.com/).
Figure 1. Three possible scenarios related to food to fight the fear of flight onboard: (a) the selection of familiar foods and beverages through an app; (b) the presentation of foods in a multisensory-favorable fashion; (c) the monitoring of well-being during flights during food consumption. (Image generated using the Microsoft 365 Copilot AI tool, https://copilot.microsoft.com/).
Applsci 15 08057 g001
Figure 2. Schematic explanation of a possible intervention strategy related to aircraft food to tailor fear of flying among passengers.
Figure 2. Schematic explanation of a possible intervention strategy related to aircraft food to tailor fear of flying among passengers.
Applsci 15 08057 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sansone, F.; Gorini, F.; Tonacci, A.; Venturi, F. Tailoring In-Flight Food Consumption to Alleviate Fear of Flying Through Sensory Stimulation. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 8057. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148057

AMA Style

Sansone F, Gorini F, Tonacci A, Venturi F. Tailoring In-Flight Food Consumption to Alleviate Fear of Flying Through Sensory Stimulation. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(14):8057. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148057

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sansone, Francesco, Francesca Gorini, Alessandro Tonacci, and Francesca Venturi. 2025. "Tailoring In-Flight Food Consumption to Alleviate Fear of Flying Through Sensory Stimulation" Applied Sciences 15, no. 14: 8057. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148057

APA Style

Sansone, F., Gorini, F., Tonacci, A., & Venturi, F. (2025). Tailoring In-Flight Food Consumption to Alleviate Fear of Flying Through Sensory Stimulation. Applied Sciences, 15(14), 8057. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15148057

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop