Non-Conventional Lane Design and Control Coordination Optimization at Urban Road Intersections: Review and Prospects
Abstract
1. Introduction
1.1. Research Background
1.2. Research Significance
1.3. Research Objectives and Paper Structure
1.4. Review Methodology
2. Concepts, Forms, and Classification of Non-Conventional Lanes
2.1. Concept Definition and Development History
2.2. Main Forms of Non-Conventional Lanes
2.2.1. Contraflow Left-Turn Lane (CLL)
2.2.2. Outside Left-Turn Lane
2.2.3. Exit Lanes for Left-Turn (EFL)
2.2.4. Variable Lanes and Reversible Lanes
2.2.5. Tandem Intersections and Double Stop Line Design
2.2.6. Other Non-Conventional Forms
2.3. Classification System
2.4. Critical Analysis and Research Gaps
3. Operational Mechanisms and Traffic Flow Characteristics of Non-Conventional Lanes
3.1. Microscopic Driving Behavior Analysis
3.2. Mesoscopic Traffic Flow Characteristics
3.3. Macroscopic Operational Patterns
3.4. Chapter Summary
4. Suitability Evaluation and Effect Analysis of Non-Conventional Lanes
4.1. Analysis of Applicable Conditions
4.2. Traffic Efficiency Evaluation
4.3. Traffic Safety Evaluation
4.4. Environmental and Social Benefits Evaluation
4.5. Comprehensive Evaluation System
4.6. Chapter Summary
5. Optimization Design and Control Methods for Non-Conventional Lanes
5.1. Traffic Space Design Optimization
5.2. Signal Control Optimization
5.3. Spatiotemporal Collaborative Optimization
5.4. Chapter Summary
6. Typical Application Cases and Empirical Research
6.1. Implementation Effect Assessment
6.2. Summary of Experiences and Lessons
7. Future Development Trends and Research Prospects
7.1. Technology Development Trends
7.2. Theoretical Research Directions
8. Conclusions and Discussion
8.1. Discussion
8.2. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Data Availability Statement
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
CAV | Connected and Autonomous Vehicle |
CLL | Contraflow Left-turn Lane |
CO | Carbon Monoxide |
CTE | Combined Tandem and Exit lanes |
CVIS | Cooperative Vehicle Infrastructure System |
EFL | Exit lanes for Left-turn |
GPS | Global Positioning System |
HDV | Human-Driven Vehicle |
LHT | Left-Hand Traffic |
MSD | Mean-Standard Deviation |
NGSIM | Next-Generation Simulation |
NOx | Nitrogen Oxides |
RHT | Right-Hand Traffic |
SDI | Signalized Diamond Interchange |
SWAL | Special Width Approach Lane |
BMILP | Binary-Mixed-Integer-Linear-Programming |
References
- An, S.; Song, L.; Wang, J.; Wang, Y.Q.; Hu, X.W. Research Status and Prospect of Non-conventional Arterial Intersection Design. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2020, 20, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
- Ma, W.; Zhao, J. Urban Road Non-Conventional Intersection Optimization Design and Control; Tongji University Press: Shanghai, China, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- El Esawey, M.; Sayed, T. Analysis of non-conventional arterial intersection designs (UAIDs): State-of-the-art methodologies and future research directions. Transp. A Transp. Sci. 2013, 9, 860–895. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, X.; Bai, Y. Traffic Design, 2nd ed.; People’s Transportation Press: Beijing, China, 2020. [Google Scholar]
- Wu, J. Operational Characteristics and Optimization Design of Contraflow Left-Turn Lane at Signalized Intersections. Ph.D. Dissertation, Southeast University, Nanjing, China, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Public Security Bureau Traffic Management Science Research Institute. Urban Road Intersection Channelization Design Manual; Mechanical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- Qiu, H. Collection of Selected Cases of Urban Road Traffic Collaborative Management; Mechanical Industry Press: Beijing, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, J.; Knoop, V.L.; Wang, M. Two-dimensional vehicular movement modelling at intersections based on optimal control. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2020, 138, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Liu, P.; Tian, Z.Z.; Xu, C. Operational analysis of the contraflow left-turn lane design at signalized intersections in China. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2016, 69, 228–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Liu, Y. Safety evaluation of intersections with dynamic use of exit-lanes for left-turn using field data. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2017, 102, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, P.; Wu, J.; Zhou, H.; Bao, J.; Yang, Z. Estimating Queue Length for Contraflow Left-Turn Lane Design at Signalized Intersections. J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 2019, 145, 04019020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, Q.; Yi, J.; Wu, Y. Cellular automaton simulation of vehicles in the contraflow left-turn lane at signalised intersections. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2019, 13, 1164–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Fu, D.J.; Zhang, C.B.; Liu, J.; Li, T.; Li, Q.L. Research of the left-turn vehicles lane-changing behaviors at signalized intersections with contraflow lane. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 2024, 633, 129364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, R.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Q.; Qi, Y. Signal timing and geometric design at contraflow left-turn lane intersections. Int. J. Transp. Sci. Technol. 2022, 11, 619–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, S.; Wang, Z.; Jiang, H. Signal timing optimisation with the contraflow left-turn lane design using the cell transmission model. Transp. A Transp. Sci. 2021, 18, 1254–1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, P.; Xu, C.; Wang, W.; Wan, J. Identifying factors affecting drivers’ selection of non-conventional outside left-turn lanes at signallised intersections. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2013, 7, 396–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guo, Y.; Liu, P.; Wu, Y.; Li, Q.Y. Safety Evaluation of Non-conventional Signalized Intersections Based on Extreme Value Model. China J. Highw. Transp. 2022, 35, 85–92. [Google Scholar]
- Cao, Y.; Jiang, D.; Li, X. Influential Factors and Determination Method of Non-conventional Outside Left-Turn Lanes Based on a BP Neural Network. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 6026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Yun, M.; Zhang, H.M.; Yang, X. Driving simulator evaluation of drivers’ response to intersections with dynamic use of exit-lanes for left-turn. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2015, 81, 107–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Ma, W.; Zhang, H.M.; Yang, X. Increasing the capacity of signalized intersections with dynamic use of exit lanes for left-turn traffic. Transp. Res. Rec. 2013, 2355, 49–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, Q.; Zhou, X.; Zhao, J. Modeling the Operation of Left-Turn Vehicles at Exit Lanes for Left-Turn Intersections. J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 2021, 147, 04021022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Li, S.; Shamo, D.E. A platoon-based traffic signal timing algorithm for major-minor intersection types. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2006, 40, 543–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pérez-Méndez, D.; Gershenson, C.; Lárraga, M.E.; Mateos, J.L. Modeling adaptive reversible lanes: A cellular automata approach. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0244326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ma, J.; Aden, Y. Reversible lane operation for arterial roadways: The Washington, DC, USA experience. ITE J. 2011, 81, 26–30. [Google Scholar]
- Mao, L.; Li, W.; Hu, P. Design of Real-Time Dynamic Reversible Lane in Intelligent Cooperative Vehicle Infrastructure System. J. Adv. Transp. 2020, 2020, 8896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Z.; Wang, Z.; Qi, X.; Wang, D.; Li, Y.; Lu, H. A two-stage robust optimal traffic signal control with reversible lane for isolated intersections. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 2024, 18, 723–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lu, T.; Yang, Z.; Ma, D.; Jin, S. Bi-Level Programming Model for Dynamic Reversible Lane Assignment. IEEE Access 2018, 6, 71592–71601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xuan, Y.; Daganzo, C.F.; Cassidy, M.J. Increasing the capacity of signalized intersections with separate left turn phases. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2011, 45, 769–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xuan, Y.; Gayah, V.V.; Cassidy, M.J.; Daganzo, C.F. Presignal Used to Increase Bus- and Car-Carrying Capacity at Intersections: Theory and Experiment. Transp. Res. Rec. 2012, 2315, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, Y.; Zhuang, H. The optimization of lane assignment and signal timing at the tandem intersection with pre-signal. J. Adv. Transp. 2014, 48, 362–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, C.; Jiang, H.; Xie, S. Capacity optimization of an isolated intersection under the phase swap sorting strategy. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2014, 60, 85–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wan, J.; Wang, C.; Bie, Y. Optimal Traffic Control for a Tandem Intersection With Improved Lane Assignments at Presignals. IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag. 2023, 15, 146–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ma, W.; Xie, H. Integrated Control of Main-Signal and Pre-Signal on Approach of Intersection with Double Stop Line. J. Jilin Univ. Eng. Technol. Ed. 2013, 43, 633–639. [Google Scholar]
- Zheng, Z.; Yuan, J.; An, K.; Zheng, N.; Ma, W. Integrated Optimization Model of Lane Function and Signal Control for Tandem Intersections. China J. Highw. Transp. 2023, 36, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Chen, K.; Zhou, X. Joint Robust Optimization of Layout Design and Signal Control for Tandem Intersections. China J. Highw. Transp. 2021, 34, 296–305. [Google Scholar]
- Xia, X.; Ma, X.; Wang, J. Control Method for Signalized Intersection with Integrated Waiting Area. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Reid, J.D.; Hummer, J.E. Travel time comparisons between seven non-conventional arterial intersection designs. Transp. Res. Rec. 2001, 1751, 56–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shao, Y.; Han, X.; Wu, H.; Shan, H.; Yang, S.; Claudel, C.G. Evaluating the sustainable traffic flow operational features of an exclusive spur dike U-turn lane design. PLoS ONE 2019, 14, e0214759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhao, C.; Liu, X.; Wu, T.; Zhang, W. Median U-Turn Intersection Critical Parameter Research and Operational Performance Evaluation. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 11445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, Z.; Tian, C.; Guo, B.; Zhu, C.; Guo, Q. Analyzing delay and CO emissions: A simulation study of the median U-turn method at intersections. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 3737. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- El Esawey, M.; Sayed, T. Comparison of Two Non-conventional Intersection Schemes: Crossover Displaced Left-Turn and Upstream Signalized Crossover Intersections. Transp. Res. Rec. 2007, 2023, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, P.; Lu, J.J.; Fan, H.; Pernia, J.C. Effects of U-turns on capacities of signalized intersections. Transp. Res. Rec. 2005, 1920, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, H.; Hsu, P.; Lu, J.J.; Wright, J.E. Optimal Location of U-Turn Median Openings on Roadways. Transp. Res. Rec. 2003, 1847, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yao, R.; Sun, L.; Sun, F.; Zhao, S. Optimizing the Location of U-Turn Median Openings at Signalized Intersections with Multitype Vehicles. J. Transp. Eng. Part A Syst. 2019, 145, 04019038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, L.; Wang, J.; Yang, L.; An, S. Combined Optimization of Lane-based Control and Signal Timing at Parallel Flow Intersection. J. Zhejiang Univ. Eng. Sci. 2024, 58, 1647–1658. [Google Scholar]
- Yang, X.; Chang, G.L.; Rahwanji, S.; Lu, Y. Development of Planning-Stage Models for Analyzing Continuous Flow Intersections. J. Transp. Eng. 2013, 139, 1124–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, W.; Wu, X.; Wang, Y.; Yu, G. A continuous-flow-intersection-lite design and traffic control for oversaturated bottleneck intersections. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2015, 56, 18–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Gao, X.; Knoop, V.L. An innovative design for left turn bicycles at continuous flow intersections. Transp. B Transp. Dyn. 2019, 7, 1305–1322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sun, Z.; Ban, X.J. Vehicle trajectory reconstruction for signalized intersections using mobile traffic sensors. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2013, 36, 268–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Yao, J.; He, S.; Han, Y. Operational Efficiency Evaluation of Intersections with Dynamic Lane Assignment Using Field Data. J. Adv. Transp. 2017, 1, 2130385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, J.; Peeta, S.; He, X. Multiclass traffic assignment model for mixed traffic flow of human-driven vehicles and connected and autonomous vehicles. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2019, 126, 139–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Liu, P.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, H. Stationary condition based performance analysis of the contraflow left-turn lane design considering the influence of the upstream intersection. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2021, 122, 102919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, Z.; Liu, P.; Zhu, R.; Ye, X.F. Estimation of the maximum queue length at signalized intersections based on shockwave theory. J. Chang’an Univ. Nat. Sci. Ed. 2015, 35, 154–159. [Google Scholar]
- Gallivan, S.; Heydecker, B.G. Optimising the control performance of traffic signals at a single junction. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 1988, 22, 357–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Improta, G.; Cantarella, G.E. Control system design for an individual signalized junction. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 1984, 18, 147–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Xie, K.; Wang, X.; Huang, H.; Chen, X. Corridor-level signalized intersection safety analysis in Shanghai, China using Bayesian hierarchical models. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2013, 50, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Zhang, J.; Wang, F.Y.; Wang, K.; Lin, W.H.; Xu, X.; Chen, C. Data-driven intelligent transportation systems: A survey. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2011, 12, 1624–1639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, T. Increasing Signalized Intersection Capacity with Non-conventional Use of Special Width Approach Lanes. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2016, 31, 794–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yu, C.; Ma, W.; Lo, H.K.; Yang, X. Robust optimal lane allocation for isolated intersections. Comput. Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 2017, 32, 72–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X. The symmetric intersection design and traffic control optimization. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2018, 92, 176–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Su, P.; Krause, C.; Bared, J.G.; Hale, D.; Bared, J.; Huang, Z. Operational Advantages of Contraflow Left-Turn Pockets at Signalized Intersections. In Proceedings of the Transportation Research Board 95th Annual Meeting, Washington, DC, USA, 10–14 January 2016. [Google Scholar]
- Wong, C.K.; Wong, S.C. Lane-based optimization of signal timings for isolated junctions. Transp. Res. Part B Methodol. 2003, 37, 63–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lam, W.H.K.; Poon, A.C.K.; Mung, G.K.S. Integrated model for lane-use and signal-phase designs. J. Transp. Eng. 1997, 123, 114–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Ma, W.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X. Integrated design and operation of urban arterials with reversible lanes. Transp. B Transp. Dyn. 2014, 2, 130–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X. Operation of signalized diamond interchanges with frontage roads using dynamic reversible lane control. Transp. Res. Part C Emerg. Technol. 2015, 51, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Ma, W. An Alternative Design for the Intersections With Limited Traffic Lanes and Queuing Space. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2021, 22, 1473–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhou, G.; Mao, L.; Bao, T.; Dai, J.; Bao, X. Construction of Real-time Dynamic Reversible Lane Safety Control Model in Intelligent Vehicle Infrastructure Cooperative System. Appl. Artif. Intell. 2023, 37, 2177009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, X.Y.; Zhang, H.Z.; Hu, B. Research on the Pre-signal Control Method for Left Turning Buses on Right Most Lane at Road Intersection. J. Inner Mongolia Univ. Technol. Nat. Sci. Ed. 2020, 39, 362–370. [Google Scholar]
- Song, L.; Bai, M.J.; Ye, Q.; Wang, S.F.; An, W.J. Geometric Design and Signal Timing Optimization of Multi-vehicle Tandem U-turn at Intersection. Technol. Highway Transp. 2022, 38, 142–148. [Google Scholar]
- Ren, Y.; Zhang, R.; Jia, Q.N. A Timing Optimization Method for Signalized Intersections Considering the Courtesy Rules to Pedestrians. J. Transp. Inf. Saf. 2022, 40, 45–53. [Google Scholar]
- Nie, L.; Ma, W.J. A Lane-Based Optimization Model for Lane Function and Signal Phase at Intersection. J. Tongji Univ. Nat. Sci. 2020, 48, 683–693. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, Y.; Yang, X.G.; Ma, Y.Y. Study on Synergy Problem of Dynamic Lane-use Assignment and Signal Control at Intersections. J. Tongji Univ. Nat. Sci. 2009, 37, 903–908. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, J.; Fu, J.Y.; Yang, X.G. Optimization Model of Dynamic Lane Assignment for Isolated Signalized Intersections. J. Tongji Univ. Nat. Sci. 2013, 41, 996–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhao, J.; Ma, W.J.; Han, Y. Integrated Optimization Model of Layouts and Signal Timings of Exit-lanes for Left-turn Intersections. China J. Highway Transp. 2017, 30, 120–127. [Google Scholar]
- Liu, P.; Qu, X.; Yu, H.; Wang, W.; Cao, B. Development of a VISSIM Simulation Model for U-Turns at Unsignalized Intersections. J. Transp. Eng. 2012, 138, 1333–1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, R.M.; Tang, J. Traffic signal control optimization model of over-saturated intersection based on dynamic programming. J. Traffic Transp. Eng. 2015, 15, 101–109. [Google Scholar]
- Li, Y.S.; Xu, J.M.; Wang, L.H. Active Multi-Layer Perimeter Control Strategy of Oversaturated Traffic Networks. J. South China Univ. Technol. Nat. Sci. Ed. 2012, 40, 27–32. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, T.W.; Zhang, C.B.; Zhou, B.; Cao, Y.; Luo, S.L. A Method of Dynamic Switch Control and Signal Timing Optimization for Reverse Variable Lane. J. Transp. Inf. Saf. 2020, 38, 59–66. [Google Scholar]
- Chen, T.T.; Jia, S.P. Deployment of Reversible Lanes with Consideration of Flow Characteristic during the Morning Peak and Evening Peak. Sci. Technol. Eng. 2021, 21, 3822–3828. [Google Scholar]
- Xie, X.; Dong, L.; Gu, H.; Li, H.; Zhang, L. A Collaborative Method on Reversible Lane Clearance and Signal Coordination Control in Associated Intersection. J. Adv. Transp. 2023, 2023, 6599484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Di, Z.; Yang, L.X. Reversible lane network design for maximizing the coupling measure between demand structure and network structure. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 2020, 141, 102031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Type | Design Features | Design Features | Key Parameters | Typical Application Scenarios |
---|---|---|---|---|
Contraflow Left-turn Lane | Borrowing space from opposing exit lanes, controlled by pre-signals | High left-turn demand, with surplus space in opposing exit lanes | Borrowing length, pre-signal timing, main-pre-signal coordination | Urban arterial intersections, intersections with left-turn ratio > 30% |
Outside Left-turn Lane | Left-turn lanes placed to the right of through lanes | Under elevated road ramps, entrances/exits near large facilities | Weaving section length, lane width, guidance marking setup | Elevated ramp entrances/exits, commercial center entrances/exits |
Tidal/Reversible Lane | Dynamically adjusting direction based on tidal traffic flow changes | Unbalanced bidirectional traffic flow, alternating peak directions | Switching timing, transition time, safety control measures | Arterial roads connecting residential and commercial areas |
Variable Guidance Lane | Same lane serving different flow directions at different times | Strong temporal variability in demand for each direction at intersections | Function switching threshold, signal timing adjustment, signs and markings | Intersections with significant directional differences between morning and evening peaks |
Double Stop Line Intersection | Using pre-signals to pre-classify and sort vehicles | Space-constrained, large variations in directional demand | Pre-signal position, sorting area length, phase difference between main and pre-signals | Congested intersections in central urban areas |
U-turn Design | Restricting direct left turns, implementing left turns indirectly through U-turns | High traffic volume on arterials, sufficient median strip width | U-turn opening position, turning radius, weaving section length | Urban expressways, arterial roads |
Continuous Flow Intersection | Eliminating left-turn conflicts by relocating left-turning vehicles before intersection | High intersection volume, sufficient traffic passage space | Transfer section length, signal phase design, transition zone setup | Large suburban intersections, loop intersections |
Research Direction | Core Content | Key Techniques | Main Results | Existing Challenges | Development Trends |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Traffic Space Design Optimization | Space layout optimization | Combinatorial optimization models | Exit-lane left-turn design improves capacity by 6.1% per approach | Insufficient handling of randomness | Robust design methods |
Parameter calibration methods | Simulation parameter calibration | VISSIM model error controlled within 20% | High parameter sensitivity | Parametric design | |
Design element integration | Multi-constraint solving | Established space-signal integrated optimization framework | Lack of standardized methods | Intelligent vehicle compatibility | |
Safety considerations | Robust design | Established space-signal integrated optimization framework | Poor adaptability to intelligent vehicles | Modular application | |
Signal Control Optimization | Dynamic timing strategies | Dynamic programming | Oversaturated control reduces delay by 5% | High real-time requirements | Adaptive control |
Saturated state control | Multi-layer boundary control | Multi-layer control outperforms single-layer control | Difficult multi-objective trade-offs | Multi-objective balancing | |
Network-level coordination | Real-time optimization | Achieved state-differentiated control objectives | Complex network coordination | Network-based coordination | |
Multi-objective optimization | Adaptive algorithms | Achieved state-differentiated control objectives | Poor adaptation to sudden events | Resilience enhancement | |
Space–Time Coordinated Optimization | Design-control integration | Bi-level programming models | Dynamic control reduces delay by 6.7–14.9% | High computational complexity | High-efficiency algorithms |
Multi-dimensional coordination | Mixed integer programming | Network total travel time significantly reduced | Difficult large-scale solving | Real-time optimization | |
Dynamic resource allocation | Nested algorithms | Established space–time coordination framework | Limited real-time optimization | Robust solution approaches | |
System optimization | Dynamic optimization | Established space–time coordination framework | Weak uncertainty handling | Dynamic coordination |
Non-Conventional Lane Type | Capacity Improvement | Delay Reduction | Emissions Reduction | Reference Studies |
---|---|---|---|---|
Contraflow Left-turn Lane (CLL) | Left-turn capacity increased by 20–30%; 11.48% capacity increase after optimization | 9.63% average delay reduction after optimization | Not quantified in reviewed studies | Wu et al. [9]; Liu et al. [15] |
Exit lanes for Left-turn (EFL) | 6.1% capacity increase per additional approach; 1–5% increase per 5% left-turn ratio increase | 1.2% delay reduction under low volumes; 5.1% queue length reduction | Not quantified in reviewed studies | Zhao et al. [20]; Zhao et al. [74] |
Outside Left-turn Lane | Indirect capacity gains through 21.8% safety improvement compared to conventional intersections | Variable effects depending on weaving area length and traffic composition | Not quantified in reviewed studies | Guo et al. [17]; Cao et al. [18] |
Tandem Intersections | 18.6% intersection capacity increase | 19.61% average delay reduction; 20.94% average queue length reduction; 22.9% delay reduction (alternative study) | CO emissions: −10.93%; NOx emissions: −12.97% | Zheng et al. [34]; Wan et al. [32] |
Parallel Flow Intersections | Up to 70.51% capacity increase with four-direction configuration | Variable based on configuration scheme | Not quantified in reviewed studies | Song et al. [45] |
Reversible Lanes | Variable based on demand patterns and real-time control | 27.4% average delay reduction with real-time dynamic control | VOC, CO, and NOx emissions: −13.5% combined reduction | Mao et al. [25] |
U-turn Design | 29.15% travel time reduction compared to traditional U-turn design | 66.70% delay reduction; 100% reduction in number of stops | Not quantified in reviewed studies | Shao et al. [38] |
Dynamic Lane Assignment | Improved utilization efficiency but 22.86% saturation flow rate reduction for variable lanes | Variable effects depending on switching strategy and timing | Not quantified in reviewed studies | Zhao et al. [50] |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Wang, Y.; Yang, X. Non-Conventional Lane Design and Control Coordination Optimization at Urban Road Intersections: Review and Prospects. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 6720. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126720
Wang Y, Yang X. Non-Conventional Lane Design and Control Coordination Optimization at Urban Road Intersections: Review and Prospects. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(12):6720. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126720
Chicago/Turabian StyleWang, Yizhe, and Xiaoguang Yang. 2025. "Non-Conventional Lane Design and Control Coordination Optimization at Urban Road Intersections: Review and Prospects" Applied Sciences 15, no. 12: 6720. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126720
APA StyleWang, Y., & Yang, X. (2025). Non-Conventional Lane Design and Control Coordination Optimization at Urban Road Intersections: Review and Prospects. Applied Sciences, 15(12), 6720. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15126720