Strain Rate Effect on Artificially Cemented Clay with Fully Developed and Developing Structure
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Materials and Methods
3. Results
3.1. Rate Effect on Developed Structured Clay
3.2. Rate Effect on Developing Structured Clay
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
- (1)
- The fully developed ACK exhibited a shearing behaviour primarily governed by the proportion of intact bonds under low confining stresses, making it insensitive to strain rate. In contrast, under a large confining stress, the cementing bonds are significantly destroyed during isotropic compression, and a negative rate effect is observed due to local drainage at a slow rate of shearing. During the post-peak stage, the shear behaviour of the fully developed ACK switched to a pure isotach with a well-formed shear plane owing to its inherent viscosity.
- (2)
- The ACK with a developing structure shows a slight negative effect during the pre-peak stage under both low and high confining stresses, resulting from the combined effect of curing time and local drainage. In the post-peak stage, the presence of an intense stick-slip shear pattern and increased bond breakage at a well-formed shear plane results in an increase in shear resistance, i.e., a negative rate effect.
- (3)
- Two types of stick-slip shear patterns were observed during the undrained shearing of ACK with a developing structure. Both types of stick-slip only occurred with a critical threshold strain rate associated with the confining stress. The stick-slip effect at the post-peak stage could be manifested by the normal force on the sliding shear plane, and a linear relationship was found
Author Contributions
Funding
Institutional Review Board Statement
Informed Consent Statement
Data Availability Statement
Conflicts of Interest
Abbreviations
ACK | Artificially Cemented Kaolin |
YACK | Young Artificially Cemented Kaolin |
OACK | Old Artificially Cemented Kaolin |
CRS | Constant Rate of Strain |
SRS | Stepwise change Rate of Strain |
PWP | Pore Water Pressure |
OC | Overcosolidated |
NC | Normal Consolidated |
CF | Clay Fraction |
Recon. | Reconstituted Soil |
SEM | Scanning Electron Microscope |
References
- Indraratna, B.; Korkitsuntornsan, W.; Nguyen, T.T. Influence of kaolin content on the cyclic loading response of railway subgrade. Transp. Geotech. 2020, 22, 100319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, S.; Xu, N.; Li, Z.C. Satellite derived coastal reclamation expansion in China since the 21st century. Glob. Ecol. Conserv. 2021, 30, e01797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yapage, N.N.S.; Liyanapathirana, D.S.; Kelly, R.B. Numerical modeling of an embankment over soft ground improved with deep cement mixed columns: Case history. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2014, 140, 04014062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, J.H.; Fang, Z. Physical modeling of a footing on soft soil ground with deep cement mixed soil columns under vertical loading. Mar. Georesour. Geotec. 2010, 28, 173–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, K.S.; Zhang, L.M.; Zou, H.F. Key factors for deep cement mixing construction for undredged offshore land reclamation. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2022, 148, 04022063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yin, Z.Y.; Zhu, Q.Y.; Zhang, D.M. Comparison of two creep degradation modeling approaches for soft structured soils. Acta Geotech. 2017, 12, 1395–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Burland, J.B. On the compressibility and shear strength of natural clays. Géotechnique 1990, 40, 329–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Graham, J.; Crooks, J.H.A.; Bell, A.L. Time effects on the stress-strain behavior of natural soft clays. Géotechnique 1983, 33, 327–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Soga, K.; Mitchell, J.K. Rate-dependent deformation of structured natural clays. In Measuring and Modeling Time Dependent Soil Behavior; ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication: Reston, VA, USA, 1996; Volume 61. [Google Scholar]
- Sadeghi-Chahardeh, A.; Mollaabbasi, R.; Picard, D.; Taghavi, S.M.; Alamdari, H. Discrete Element Method Modeling for the Failure Analysis of Dry Mono-Size Coke Aggregates. Materials 2021, 14, 2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sadeghi-Chahardeh, A.; Mollaabbasi, R.; Picard, D.; Taghavi, S.M.; Alamdari, H. Effect of Particle Size Distributions and Shapes on the Failure Behavior of Dry Coke Aggregates. Materials 2021, 14, 5558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, P.Q.; Baudet, B.A. Strain rate dependence of the critical state line of reconstituted clays. Géotech. Lett. 2016, 6, 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, X.M.; Jia, Y.L.; Wang, Z.L. Step-changed strain rate effect on the mechanical properties of undisturbed expansive clay. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 2024, 28, 38–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sorensen, K.K.; Baudet, B.A.; Simpson, B. Influence of structure on the time-dependent behaviour of a stiff sedimentary clay. Géotechnique 2007, 57, 113–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Torisu, S.S.; Pereira, J.M.; De Gennaro, V. Strain-rate effects in deep marine clays from the Gulf of Guinea. Géotechnique 2012, 62, 767–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Asaoka, A.; Nakano, M.; Noda, T. Delayed compression/consolidation of natural clay due to degradation of soil structure. Soils Found. 2000, 40, 75–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Oka, F.; Kodaka, T.; Kimoto, S. Step-changed strain rate effect on the stress-strain relations of clay and a constitutive modeling. Soils Found. 2003, 43, 189–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.; Yin, Z.Y.; Dano, C. Effect of strain rate on the adhesive bond shearing resistance of stiff clay. Transp. Geotech. 2021, 27, 100479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.R.; Wen, B.P.; Aydin, A. Ring shear tests on slip zone soils of three giant landslides in the Three Gorges Project area. Eng. Geol. 2013, 154, 106–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sassa, K.; Wang, G.; Fukuoka, H. Landslide risk evaluation and hazard zoning for rapid and long-travel landslides in urban development areas. Landslides 2004, 1, 221–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, L.; Han, J.; Liu, S. Variation in shearing rate effect on residual strength of slip zone soils due to test conditions. Geotech. Geol. Eng. 2020, 38, 2773–2785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tika, T.E.; Vaughan, P.R.; Lemos, L.J.L. Fast shearing of pre-existing shear zones in soils. Géotechnique 1996, 46, 197–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bhat, D.R. Effect of shearing rate on residual strength of kaolin clay. Electron. J. Geotech. Eng. 2013, 18, 1387–1396. [Google Scholar]
- Li, D.; Yin, K.; Glade, T. Effect of over-consolidation and shear rate on the residual strength of soils of silty sand in the Three Gorges Reservoir. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 5503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Stark, T.D.; Hussain, M. Shear strength in preexisting landslides. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2010, 136, 957–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gratchev, I.B.; Sassa, K. Shear strength of clay at different shear rates. J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 2015, 141, 06015002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duong, N.T.; Suzuki, M.; Van Hai, N. Rate and acceleration effects on residual strength of kaolin and kaolin–bentonite mixtures in ring shearing. Soils Found. 2018, 58, 1153–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Delage, P. A microstructure approach to the sensitivity and compressibility of some eastern Canada sensitive clays. Géotechnique 2010, 60, 353–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Horpibulsuk, S.; Miura, N.; Nagaraj, T.S. Assessment of strength development in cement-admixed high-water content clays with Abrams’ law as a basis. Géotechnique 2003, 53, 439–444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jiang, Y.; Wang, D.; Di, S. On the compression behavior of remolded cement-admixed soft clay. Mar. Georesour. Geotec. 2017, 36, 323–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, J.; Liu, S.Y.; Deng, Y.F. Microscopic phase identification of cement-stabilized clay by nanoindentation and statistical analytics. Appl. Clay Sci. 2022, 224, 106531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Suzuki, M.; Hai, N.V.; Yamamoto, T. Ring shear characteristics of discontinuous plane. Soils Found. 2017, 57, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Berthoud, P.; Baumberger, I. Physical analysis of the state-and rate-dependent friction law: Static friction. Phys. Rev. B 1999, 59, 14313–14327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, J.G.; Yin, J.H. Strain-rate-dependent stress–strain behavior of overconsolidated Hong Kong marine clay. Can. Geotech. J. 2000, 37, 1272–1282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, C.M.; Yin, J.H. Strain-Rate Dependent Stress-Strain Behavior of Undisturbed Hong Kong Marine Deposits under Oedometric and Triaxial Stress States. Mar. Georesour. Geot. 2005, 23, 61–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Scaringi, G.; Di Maio, C. Influence of displacement rate on residual shear strength of clays. Procedia Earth Planet. Sci. 2016, 16, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Test Name | Curing & Consolidation Stress (kPa) | Curing Time (Days) | p’0 | Pre-Peak Strain Rate (%/h) | Post-Peak Strain Rate (%/h) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
OACK-P100-R0.01 | 100 | 30 | 100 | 0.01 | 0.1/5 |
OACK-P100-R0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1/5 | |||
OACK-P100-R1 | 1 | 0.1/5 | |||
OACK-P600-R0.1 | 600 | 0.1 | 0.1/5 | ||
OACK-P600-R5 | 5 | 0.1/5 | |||
OACK-P600-R5Cr ^ | 5 + creep | 0.1/5 | |||
YACK-P100-R0.01 | 100 | 2 | 100 | 0.01 | 0.1/5 |
YACK-P100-R1 | 1 | 0.1/5 | |||
YACK-P100-R5 | 5 | 0.1/5 | |||
YACK-P600-R0.1 | 600 | 0.1 | 0.1/5 | ||
YACK-P600-R5 | 5 | 0.1/5 |
Type of Soil | Soil Structure Status | Shearing Procedure | Shear Rate (%/h) | Rate Effect | Mechanism | Reference | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-Peak/Small Strain | Post-Peak /Large Strain | ||||||
Belfast clay | OC Undisturbed | Triaxial SRS | 0.05-0.5-5 | Positive | Positive | Shear viscosity | Graham et al. [8] |
Hong Kong Marine clay | NC + OC Recon. | Triaxial CRS | 0.15-1.5-15 | Positive | Positive | Shear viscosity | Zhu & Yin [34] |
OC Undisturbed | Triaxial SRS | 0.2-2-20 | Positive | Positive | Shear viscosity and smaller excess PWP at a higher rate | Cheng & Yin [35] | |
London clay | NC + OC Recon. | Triaxial SRS | 0.007-0.05-0.5 | Positive | Insensitive | Shear viscosity and decaying isotach at large strain | Sorensen et al. [14] |
OC Undisturbed | Triaxial SRS | 0.05-0.2-0.8 | Positive | Positive | Rate dependence of post-sedimentation structure | ||
Merville stiff clay | NC + OC Recon. | Triaxial CRS | 0.26-2.6-26.0 | Positive | Positive | Shear viscosity | Han et al. [18] |
OC Undisturbed | Triaxial CRS | 0.26-2.6-26.0 | Positive | Insensitive | Rate dependence of interparticle debonding | ||
Pure Kaolin clay | NC + OC Recon. | Triaxial SRS | 0.1-0.5-2-10 | Positive | Positive | Shear viscosity | Li & Baudet [12] |
Artificial cemented Kaolin clay | OACK at low p’ | Triaxial CRS + SRS | 0.01-0.1-1-5 | Insensitive | Positive | Stiff bonds at pre-peak; shear mode change at post-peak | This study |
OACK at high p’ | Triaxial CRS + SRS | 0.1-5 | Negative | Positive | Bonds broken and local drainage near shear plane; | ||
YACK at low p’ | Triaxial CRS + SRS | 0.01-1-5 | Negative | Negative | Combined curing effect and stick-slip | ||
YACK at high p’ | Triaxial CRS + SRS | 0.1-5 | Negative | Negative | Combined curing effect and stick-slip |
Type of Soil | Soil Structure Status | Shearing Procedure | Shear Rate (mm/min) | Rate Effect on Residual Strength | Mechanism | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Kaolin clay | Recon. CF = 74% | Ring shear | 0.013-0.13-1.12-9.9-90.8-230 | Positive | Shear viscosity; sliding to turbulent shear with a higher rate | Tika et al. [22] |
Claystone | Recon. CF = 52% | Ring shear | 0.05-0.92-10-100-400-6000 | Negative | Soils with transitional shear | |
Amber clay | Recon. CF = 66% | Ring shear | 12-60-120-300 | Negative | Healing, broken bonds restoration at a lower rate | Gratchev & Sassa [26] |
Brown clay | Recon. CF = 19% | Ring shear | 12-60-120-300 | Negative | Healing, broken bonds restoration at a lower rate | |
Kaolin clay | Recon. CF = 100% | Direct shear | 3.6-36-360 | Negative | Larger excess PWP with a higher rate | Li et al. [19] |
Kaolin clay | Recon. CF = 74% | Ring shear | 0.09-0.6-1-11.1 | Positive | Shear viscosity; Only significant v > 0.5 mm/min | Scaringi & Di Maio [36] |
Kualiangzi landslide | Recon. CF = 74% | Ring shear | 0.002-0.6-1-120 | Positive | Shear viscosity; only positive v > 3 mm/min | |
Kaolin clay | Recon. CF = 74% | Ring shear | 0.02-0.1-0.2-1-10 | Positive | Shear viscosity; Only significant v > 0.1 mm/min | Suzuki et al. [32] |
4% Cemented Kaolin clay | Recon. | Ring shear | 0.02-0.1-0.2-1-10 | Insensitive | undulating shear behaviour | |
Kaolin clay | Recon. CF = 46% | Ring shear | 0.02-0.2-2-20 | Positive | Shear viscosity; sliding to turbulent shear; | Duong et al. [27] |
Kaolin + Bentonite clay | Recon. CF = 50.8% | Ring shear | 0.02-0.2-2-20 | Negative | Larger excess PWP and finer particles at the shear zone with a higher rate |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2025 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Li, Q.; Baudet, B.A.; Zhang, X. Strain Rate Effect on Artificially Cemented Clay with Fully Developed and Developing Structure. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 5839. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115839
Li Q, Baudet BA, Zhang X. Strain Rate Effect on Artificially Cemented Clay with Fully Developed and Developing Structure. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(11):5839. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115839
Chicago/Turabian StyleLi, Qiang, Beatrice Anne Baudet, and Xiaoyan Zhang. 2025. "Strain Rate Effect on Artificially Cemented Clay with Fully Developed and Developing Structure" Applied Sciences 15, no. 11: 5839. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115839
APA StyleLi, Q., Baudet, B. A., & Zhang, X. (2025). Strain Rate Effect on Artificially Cemented Clay with Fully Developed and Developing Structure. Applied Sciences, 15(11), 5839. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15115839