Next Article in Journal
Organochlorine Contaminants in Maize Fertilized with Meat and Bone Meal Derived from Animal By-Products
Previous Article in Journal
TMD Damping for Structures with Uncertain Modal Parameters
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Current Practices of Railway Ballastless Track Design Methods in China

1
School of Civil Engineering, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China
2
Beijing Urban Construction Design & Development Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100037, China
3
China Railway Construction Group Fourth Construction Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200131, China
4
China Railway Engineering Consulting Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100073, China
5
Frontiers Science Center for Smart High-Speed Railway System, Beijing 100044, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(10), 5621; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105621 (registering DOI)
Submission received: 1 April 2025 / Revised: 14 May 2025 / Accepted: 15 May 2025 / Published: 17 May 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Civil Engineering)

Abstract

With the development of railway transportation, diversified demands for track structures require the design methods to be safer, more flexible and efficient. At present, the limit state method is regarded as a more scientific design method compared to the allowable stress method, but its optimization effects await further research. Taking a new type of prefabricated track slab as an example, the differences between the two methods are deeply analyzed using finite element simulation and formula calculation. The development prospect for the track design methods is proposed, providing reference for new structures. The results show the following: (1) There are significant differences in the calculation principles between the two methods. Unlike the single safety factor K of the allowable stress method, the partial factors of the limit state method make it more reasonable. (2) The working conditions of different train speeds and temperature gradients are the main factors influencing the design results, and the latter plays a main control role. (3) Under current specification, the reinforcement and slab thickness can be reduced by approximately 6.5% and 3.4%, respectively, according to the limit state method, but the values its coefficient still need to be studied further to achieve efficiency.
Keywords: railways track; ballastless track; structure design; limit state method; allowable stress method railways track; ballastless track; structure design; limit state method; allowable stress method

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, P.; Hua, C.; Han, H.; Xiao, H.; Liu, X.; Zhong, Y. Current Practices of Railway Ballastless Track Design Methods in China. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 5621. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105621

AMA Style

Chen P, Hua C, Han H, Xiao H, Liu X, Zhong Y. Current Practices of Railway Ballastless Track Design Methods in China. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(10):5621. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105621

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Peng, Chen Hua, Haiyan Han, Hanbing Xiao, Xinghan Liu, and Yanglong Zhong. 2025. "Current Practices of Railway Ballastless Track Design Methods in China" Applied Sciences 15, no. 10: 5621. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105621

APA Style

Chen, P., Hua, C., Han, H., Xiao, H., Liu, X., & Zhong, Y. (2025). Current Practices of Railway Ballastless Track Design Methods in China. Applied Sciences, 15(10), 5621. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105621

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article metric data becomes available approximately 24 hours after publication online.
Back to TopTop