Next Article in Journal
Comparative Evaluation of Presented Strength Criteria of Anisotropic Rocks Based on Triaxial Experiments
Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Drying Method: Influence of Pre-Treatment and Process Conditions of Ultrasound-Assisted Drying on Apple Quality
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Data-Driven Battery Degradation Estimation Method for Low-Earth-Orbit (LEO) Satellites
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
This is an early access version, the complete PDF, HTML, and XML versions will be available soon.
Article

Reliability Assessment of Ship Lubricating Oil Systems Through Improved Dynamic Bayesian Networks and Multi-Source Data Fusion

1
Jiangsu Shipbuilding and Ocean Engineering Design and Research Institute, Zhenjiang 212100, China
2
School of Automation, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang 212100, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2025, 15(10), 5310; https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105310
Submission received: 18 March 2025 / Revised: 23 April 2025 / Accepted: 6 May 2025 / Published: 9 May 2025

Abstract

The operational efficiency and reliability of the ship’s lubrication oil system directly impact the vessel’s safety. Traditional reliability analysis methods struggle to effectively handle the system’s dynamic characteristics and multi-source data analysis. To address these issues, this study proposes an innovative method that integrates feature dimensionality reduction, a dynamic Bayesian network of gravity model to improve the accuracy of system reliability analysis. First, the proportional hazards model is used to evaluate the operational reliability of each component, providing a quantitative basis for assessing the system’s health status through failure rate estimation. Then, a dynamic Bayesian network model is employed for overall system reliability analysis, fully considering the impact of multi-state devices and different maintenance strategies. The proposed DBN-based reliability assessment method achieves significant improvements over the traditional Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). The reliability of the main lubrication oil system (GUB) increases from 0.169 to 0.261, representing a 9.2% improvement; under scheduled maintenance conditions, the system reliability stabilizes at approximately 0.9873 after 0.4×105 h, compared to only 0.24 without maintenance. The proposed method effectively evaluates the reliability of the lubrication oil system, and the maintenance strategy using this method can greatly improve the reliability, providing strong support for scientifically guiding maintenance decisions.
Keywords: ship lubricating oil system; reliability analysis; proportional hazards model; dynamic Bayesian network ship lubricating oil system; reliability analysis; proportional hazards model; dynamic Bayesian network

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xiao, H.; Qi, L.; Shi, J.; Li, S.; Tang, R.; Zuo, D.; Da, B. Reliability Assessment of Ship Lubricating Oil Systems Through Improved Dynamic Bayesian Networks and Multi-Source Data Fusion. Appl. Sci. 2025, 15, 5310. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105310

AMA Style

Xiao H, Qi L, Shi J, Li S, Tang R, Zuo D, Da B. Reliability Assessment of Ship Lubricating Oil Systems Through Improved Dynamic Bayesian Networks and Multi-Source Data Fusion. Applied Sciences. 2025; 15(10):5310. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105310

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xiao, Han, Liang Qi, Jiayu Shi, Shankai Li, Runkang Tang, Danfeng Zuo, and Bin Da. 2025. "Reliability Assessment of Ship Lubricating Oil Systems Through Improved Dynamic Bayesian Networks and Multi-Source Data Fusion" Applied Sciences 15, no. 10: 5310. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105310

APA Style

Xiao, H., Qi, L., Shi, J., Li, S., Tang, R., Zuo, D., & Da, B. (2025). Reliability Assessment of Ship Lubricating Oil Systems Through Improved Dynamic Bayesian Networks and Multi-Source Data Fusion. Applied Sciences, 15(10), 5310. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15105310

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop