Special Issue on Computational Ultrasound Imaging and Applications
- Susceptibility to aberrations: The quality of a US image degrades if there are deviations from the assumed speed of sound or reflections that are not accounted for during beamforming. In the context of process metrology, for instance, having a multi-mode wave guide in the acoustical path to shield the transducer array from hot melts prevents in situ flow imaging [1]. In medical context, the strong aberrations induced by the skull bone hinder transcranial US imaging and therapy [2]. This limitation impedes non-invasive, pre-hospital or bed-side diagnostics and continuous monitoring of the brain.
- Limited processing bandwidth: The bandwidth of capturing and processing the information conveyed in the sound field is often limited by the ultrasound device. This makes it very hard to simultaneously achieve real-time 3D imaging with high spatial and temporal resolution over a large field of view. As a result, it is still challenging to comprehensibly capture fast-moving volumetric objects with complex structures, such as the beating heart [3].
- Diffraction limit: The diffraction of sound waves limits the resolution of classical US imaging and hinders the ability to visualize sub-wavelength objects or structures. By overcoming this limitation, anatomical and functional imaging of microvasculature in vivo [4] or high-resolution flow mapping in technical processes [5] becomes feasible. In the future, this may even enable imaging and tracking of medical microrobots, which is essential for their application in vivo [6].
- Manual decision-making process: Deriving diagnostic decisions from ultrasound images is a complex and to date mostly manual process. Augmenting or automating parts of the decision-making process through advanced statistical or machine learning methods could potentially lead to faster and more objective diagnostic results [7].
- Limited modalities: Restriction to the classical modalities of US imaging, such as brightness mode (B-mode) and Doppler, reduces its diagnostic value. Acquiring additional modalities through computational or physical methods can provide more information. For example, shear wave elastography can infer the mechanical stiffness of tissues and materials [8], and photoacoustic imaging can reveal their optical properties [9].
- Mozaffarzadeh et al. show that geometry-based phase aberration correction enhances the contrast and resolution of transcranial images [10]. Nguyen Minh et al. show that US-based estimation of the thickness and speed of sound of the human tibia bone is improved through phase aberration correction [11]. Doveri et al. establish reflection-mode ultrasound computed tomography for accurately mapping anatomical features despite strong reflections and speed of sound differences [12].
- Weik et al. achieve super resolution flow imaging in liquid metals by utilizing ultrasound localization microscopy [15].
- Olteanu et al. use shear-wave elastography for diagnosing high-risk varices in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease based on the mechanical properties of the spleen [18].
Funding
Acknowledgments
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Grüter, L.; Nauber, R.; Czarske, J. Ultrasonic Bubble Imaging in Molten Salt Using a Multi-Mode Waveguide and Time Reversal. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2022, 71, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lindsey, B.D.; Nicoletto, H.A.; Bennett, E.R.; Laskowitz, D.T.; Smith, S.W. 3-D Transcranial Ultrasound Imaging with Bilateral Phase Aberration Correction of Multiple Isoplanatic Patches: A Pilot Human Study with Microbubble Contrast Enhancement. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2014, 40, 90–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Papadacci, C.; Pernot, M.; Couade, M.; Fink, M.; Tanter, M. High-contrast ultrafast imaging of the heart. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2014, 61, 288–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Christensen-Jeffries, K.; Couture, O.; Dayton, P.A.; Eldar, Y.C.; Hynynen, K.; Kiessling, F.; O’Reilly, M.; Pinton, G.F.; Schmitz, G.; Tang, M.X.; et al. Super-resolution Ultrasound Imaging. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 2020, 46, 865–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kupsch, C.; Feierabend, L.; Nauber, R.; Buttner, L.; Czarske, J. Ultrasound Super-Resolution Flow Measurement of Suspensions in Narrow Channels. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control. 2021, 68, 807–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nauber, R.; Goudu, S.R.; Goeckenjan, M.; Bornhäuser, M.; Ribeiro, C.; Medina-Sánchez, M. Medical microrobots in reproductive medicine from the bench to the clinic. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liu, S.; Wang, Y.; Yang, X.; Lei, B.; Liu, L.; Li, S.X.; Ni, D.; Wang, T. Deep Learning in Medical Ultrasound Analysis: A Review. Engineering 2019, 5, 261–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Garra, B.S. Elastography: History, principles, and technique comparison. Abdom. Imaging 2015, 40, 680–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, L.; Wang, L.V. The emerging role of photoacoustic imaging in clinical oncology. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2022, 19, 365–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mozaffarzadeh, M.; Verweij, M.D.; de Jong, N.; Renaud, G. Comparison of Phase-Screen and Geometry-Based Phase Aberration Correction Techniques for Real-Time Transcranial Ultrasound Imaging. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 10183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nguyen Minh, H.; Muller, M.; Raum, K. Estimation of Thickness and Speed of Sound for Transverse Cortical Bone Imaging Using Phase Aberration Correction Methods: An In Silico and Ex Vivo Validation Study. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 5283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Doveri, E.; Sabatier, L.; Long, V.; Lasaygues, P. Reflection-Mode Ultrasound Computed Tomography Based on Wavelet Processing for High-Contrast Anatomical and Morphometric Imaging. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 9368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kaddoura, T.; Zemp, R.J. Hadamard Aperiodic Interval Codes for Parallel-Transmission 2D and 3D Synthetic Aperture Ultrasound Imaging. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhang, C.; Geng, X.; Yao, F.; Liu, L.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y. The Ultrasound Signal Processing Based on High-Performance CORDIC Algorithm and Radial Artery Imaging Implementation. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 5664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Weik, D.; Grüter, L.; Räbiger, D.; Singh, S.; Vogt, T.; Eckert, S.; Czarske, J.; Büttner, L. Ultrasound Localization Microscopy in Liquid Metal Flows. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kerdegari, H.; Phung, N.T.H.; McBride, A.; Pisani, L.; Nguyen, H.V.; Duong, T.B.; Razavi, R.; Thwaites, L.; Yacoub, S.; Gomez, A.; et al. B-Line Detection and Localization in Lung Ultrasound Videos Using Spatiotemporal Attention. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Del-Canto-Fernández, A.; Calleja-Martínez, P.; Descalzo-Hoyas, B.; Rodríguez-Posada, S.; Cuenca-Zaldívar, N.; Fernández-Carnero, S.; Naranjo-Cinto, F.; Gallego-Izquierdo, T. The Application of Image Texture Analysis Techniques on the Effects of Dry Needling versus Placebo in Low-Back Pain Patients: A Pilot-Study. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 5556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Olteanu, V.A.; Sfarti, C.V.; Balan, G.G.; Timofte, O.; Gologan, E.; Mitrică, D.E.; Gilca-Blanariu, G.E.; Dascalu, C.G.; Sandu, I.; Ştefănescu, G. The Role of Shear-Wave Elastography of the Spleen in Ruling out the Presence of High-Risk Varices in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD). Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 5764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Nauber, R.; Büttner, L.; Czarske, J. Special Issue on Computational Ultrasound Imaging and Applications. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 964. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14030964
Nauber R, Büttner L, Czarske J. Special Issue on Computational Ultrasound Imaging and Applications. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(3):964. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14030964
Chicago/Turabian StyleNauber, Richard, Lars Büttner, and Jürgen Czarske. 2024. "Special Issue on Computational Ultrasound Imaging and Applications" Applied Sciences 14, no. 3: 964. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14030964
APA StyleNauber, R., Büttner, L., & Czarske, J. (2024). Special Issue on Computational Ultrasound Imaging and Applications. Applied Sciences, 14(3), 964. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14030964