Next Article in Journal
Intelligent Diagnosis of Bearing Failures Based on Recurrence Quantification and Energy Difference
Previous Article in Journal
Advancements in Technologies and Methodologies of Machine Learning in Landslide Susceptibility Research: Current Trends and Future Directions
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of Water Content on Light Nonaqueous Phase Fluid Migration in Sandy Soil

Earth Geosciences and Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou 450045, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2024, 14(21), 9640; https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219640
Submission received: 21 August 2024 / Revised: 17 October 2024 / Accepted: 21 October 2024 / Published: 22 October 2024

Abstract

:
Contamination from light nonaqueous phase fluids (LNAPLs) and their derivatives during mining, production, and transportation has become a concern. Scholars have extensively studied LNAPL contamination, but the role of water content variation on its migration process in the unsaturated zone has not been sufficiently researched. The specific issue addressed in this study is the impact of water content on the migration of light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs) in sandy soils, a critical yet under-researched aspect of subsurface contamination. To tackle this, we employed indoor simulated vertical, one-dimensional, multiphase flow soil column experiments, utilizing the orthogonal experimental method to systematically evaluate the effects of varying water contents on the occurrence state and migration rate of LNAPLs. The experimental results indicate the following: (1) The migration rate of LNAPL exhibits an L-shaped trend during subsurface imbibition and a nonlinear relationship with migration time. The migration rate and migration time of surface infiltration have a linear growth relationship. (2) The residual rate of LNAPL is negatively correlated with water content and positively correlated with oil content in the homogeneous non-saturated state. With the increase in the amount of leaked oil, 40% of the leaked LNAPL is sorbed within the soil. (3) When the water content of the test medium is below 14%, and the oil content is below 11%, LNAPL appears in the unsaturated zone in a solid phase. As the water content increases, the adsorption rate of the oil phase gradually decreases and eventually reaches the oil saturation point. (4) When the water content of the medium exceeds 8%, over time, LNAPL will be subject to oil–water interfacial tension, and the rate of LNAPL movement first decreases and then increases, displaying nonlinear growth. The innovation of this work lies in the comprehensive analysis of LNAPL migration under controlled laboratory conditions, providing results that enhance the understanding of LNAPL behavior in sandy soils. These quantitative insights are crucial for developing targeted remediation strategies for LNAPL-induced pollution in the unsaturated zone.

1. Introduction

Light nonaqueous phase fluids (LNAPLs) can contaminate soil and groundwater and even endanger human life in the event of leaks. In oil extraction and petrochemical production areas, oil spills damage soil structure, reduce soil permeability, and affect microbial growth. Approximately 8 million tons of oil enter the environment every year globally [1], with approximately 600,000 t in China, of which approximately 70,000 t flows into the soil, causing soil pollution [2]. Following soil contamination, oil can easily seep into groundwater through precipitation, surface water, and irrigation channel water [3], thereby polluting the groundwater. In addition, LNAPLs can volatilize into the atmosphere and be taken into the human body via breathing, skin contact, and ingestion, for example, affecting the normal functions of the liver, kidneys, and other organs, and even have considerable carcinogenic, teratogenic, and mutagenic effects on the human body [4]. In 2004, a pipeline leaked thousands of tons of crude oil at Yan’an in Shaanxi Province, resulting in the contamination of hundreds of acres of farmland [5]. In 2015, an oil leak from the Changqing oilfield contaminated dozens of kilometers of rivers, causing serious contamination of the soil environment in Wuqi County, Yan’an. Chemically contaminated sites account for 44.1% of the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Construction Land Soil Pollution Risk Control and Remediation List, with petroleum hydrocarbons accounting for up to 42.10% [6]. In 2009, a diesel spill occurred in the Weinan branch of the China National Petroleum Corporation’s Lanzhou–Zhengzhou–Changsha oil pipeline during the commissioning of the sub-transmission, which resulted in around 100 kiloliters of diesel flowing into the Chishui River, a tributary of the Wei River. According to Russian scientists, 7% of global crude oil extracted each year enters the environment and contaminates soil and groundwater [7]. Thus, there is an urgent need to investigate the migration mechanism of LNAPLs as well as their occurrence state.
The process of petroleum pollutant migration includes convection, diffusion, dispersion, dissolution, volatilization, adsorption, and desorption (Figure 1). Along with groundwater level fluctuations, different pollutant components are continuously exchanged, migrated, adsorbed, desorbed, and diffused in the unsaturated zone, groundwater fluctuation zone, and aquifer [6,8]. Jing et al. [9] combined HYDRUS-1D software and the TOUGH program to establish numerical simulations and study the effects of migration and retention of LNAPLs during dynamic fluctuations of groundwater level caused by the freeze–thaw process. Atteia et al. [10] presented a model to study the influence of groundwater table fluctuations on oil thickness in a well related to an LNAPL-contaminated aquifer, which was compared with field data obtained by continuous measurement of the vertical position of LNAPL in wells. Zhou et al. [11] developed an LNAPL simulator to simulate the migration process of LNAPL under water table fluctuations, which is capable of portraying the migration of pollutants relatively accurately. LNAPL moves downward vertically in the unsaturated zone, gradually replacing capillary water. Following an oil leak, it migrates downward into the unsaturated zone through gravity. When it reaches the groundwater level, it floats on the water surface and diffuses laterally, but the overall trend is downward migration [12,13]. The distribution of water content in the unsaturated zone is the main factor controlling the distribution pattern of LNAPL. The occurrence of LNAPLs in the unsaturated zone can be divided into four categories: free-flowing liquid phase, adsorbed phase (adsorbed on the surface of soil particles), dissolved phase (dissolved in water), and volatile phase (volatilized in the atmosphere) [4,14]. In the saturated zone, the oil phase and water phase exist.
The migration and transformation of LNAPL in the subsurface environment is extremely complicated. Using a UV spectrophotometer, Zhu et al. [15] simulated the migration process of diesel fuel in porous media under different conditions using a one-dimensional soil column experiment and analyzed the vertical migration of diesel fuel in two different grain sizes of sandy soil. Wu et al. [16] simulated diesel–water two-phase flow in a porous medium with different particle sizes of glass sand in the saturated zone and obtained the saturation distribution of oil–water two-phase flow via image analysis, thus enabling quantitative analysis of saturation in multiphase flow. Xing [17] combined numerical simulations with a centrifugal model test, simulating the transport process of LNAPL in unsaturated soils under homogeneous and inter-layered conditions using finite element analysis of multiphase flow in porous media. Wang [18] applied multiphase flow theory to analyze the mechanisms influencing the infiltration and redistribution processes of LNAPLs in different types and structures of soils. Rui et al. [19] examined the retention process of the capillary zone during the migration of LNAPL pollutants in fine sand and silt media and simulated the migration process of LNAPL under a shallow point source leakage scenario with two-dimensional sand tank experiments. Shen et al. [20] built a multiphase numerical flow model based on COMSOL. They investigated the migration behavior of LNAPL in sand-filled fractured media with a combination of indoor experiments and numerical simulations. Govindarajan et al. [21] employed magnetic resonance imaging to observe the mobilization of LNAPL trapped in wet sand under natural drying conditions of a wet porous medium. Teramoto et al. [22] estimated the volume and the distribution of LNAPLs more precisely based on the high-resolution laser-induced fluorescence technique. The migration of LNAPL in the groundwater environment is complex and involves a combination of physical, chemical, and biological processes [23]. The complexity of LNAPL migration in groundwater environmental systems is mainly manifested by the complexities of influencing factors as well as migration processes. Various factors, such as the thickness of the aquifer, characteristics of the soil in the stratum, organic matter content, depth and flow direction and velocity of groundwater, and hydrogeological conditions in which the groundwater is located, all affect the migration process, migration rate, migration volume, and the occurrence state of LNAPLs in the groundwater environment [24].
The specific issue addressed in this study is the impact of water content on the migration of light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs) in sandy soils, a critical yet under-researched aspect of subsurface contamination. To tackle this, we employed indoor simulated vertical, one-dimensional, multiphase flow soil column experiments, utilizing the orthogonal experimental method to systematically evaluate the effects of varying water contents on the occurrence state and migration rate of LNAPLs, which is important for solving environmental problems associated with LNAPL pollution in the unsaturated zone. The main research objectives of this study are as follows: (1) Analyze the effects of gravity and capillary forces on the migration rate of LNAPLs via simulations of both surface infiltration and subsurface imbibition; (2) quantitatively simulate the effects of the water content and oil content of media on the adsorption rate of LNAPL and the migration rate change process based on a one-dimensional soil column experiment.
Here are the short definitions for the geological terms for the manuscript.
  • Unsaturated Zone: The unsaturated zone is the portion of the subsurface above the groundwater table where soil and rock contain both air and water in their pores. It is not a source of readily available water for human consumption but plays a crucial role in the movement of water from the land surface to the aquifer below.
  • Saturated Zone: The saturated zone, also known as the zone of saturation, is a subsurface layer where the soil and rock pores are completely filled with water. It is located below the water table and is a primary source of groundwater for human consumption and use.
  • Residual Saturation: Residual saturation refers to the amount of fluid that remains in the pore spaces of a rock or soil after the maximum amount has been drained under the influence of an external force, such as gravity or capillary action. It is the saturation below which a phase no longer drains significantly under the influence of a capillary pressure gradient.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Experiment Materials

The test soil samples were taken from the river channel of the Zhengzhou reach of the Yellow River, and the stratigraphic distribution of the site in this study area is relatively regular, with a relatively uniform vertical and horizontal distribution and minor fluctuations. According to the stratigraphic distribution characteristics, the aquifer in this area is dominated by sandy media; therefore, the sandy media in the Yellow River bank soil was selected as the object of study. Samples were taken from a depth of 3.0–5.0 m. The test media property indicators are provided in Table 1.
In recent years, underground oil pipeline leaks have occurred frequently, as well as run-off, spillage, dripping, and leaks during the production process, which can cause very severe soil and groundwater pollution. In this experiment, 0# light diesel fuel was used to represent LNAPL, which has a density of 0.84 g/mL, a kinematic viscosity coefficient of 3.0–8.0 mm2, and a boiling point of 180–370 °C. In addition, the fuel is flammable and nonvolatile, insoluble in water, easily soluble in ethanol and other organic solvents, and relatively safe to operate. Its physical properties are detailed in Table 2.

2.2. Experimental Setup

A column of acrylic glass, designated for soil sample studies, measures 5 cm in diameter and stands at a height of 30 cm (Figure 2). The column has impermeable sidewalls and a removable base that serves as a reservoir for the LNAPL. A drainage hole is present at the bottom of the removable base, which is perforated and covered with a layer of gauze to prevent smaller porous media from falling into the base, simulating LNAPL flowing from the porous media into groundwater.

2.3. Research Methods

2.3.1. Surface Infiltration and Subsurface Imbibition Experiment

Two forms of LNAPL flow were simulated, surface infiltration and subsurface imbibition, to reproduce common types of LNAPL leakage in realistic scenarios (Figure 3). Introducing LNAPL into the test soil from the top of the column, the process simulates surface infiltration when LNAPL contamination occurs at or near the surface, and the LNAPL-contaminated fluid migrates downward into the subsurface porous medium primarily by gravity. Introducing LNAPL into the test soil from the bottom of the column simulates the process of LNAPL subsurface imbibition from a storage tank guide leakage, whereby LNAPL migrates upward under capillary force. When the weight of the water column and the component of surface tension in the vertical direction are equal, the liquid in the vertical tube rises to reach the maximum rise height. The maximum rise height can be calculated by the following equation [25]:
h c = 2 T s cos θ ρ g d m
Ts is the surface tension/N; θ is the contact angle/rad; ρ is the density of the solution/(g∙cm−3); g is the acceleration of gravity/(m∙s−2); and dm is the radius of the capillary/cm.
Before the start of the simulation, debris was removed from the test medium, and the sample was air-dried at 105 °C in an oven for 12 h. It was weighed every 2 h until the sample mass remained unchanged to exclude the influence of water content from the experiment process. The experimental process was monitored in real-time, and the height of pollutant migration was photographed and recorded at various times. The changing LNAPL migration rate over time was compared under different forces to analyze the change of force effect under different conditions.

2.3.2. Unsaturated Soil Column Experiment

The saturated weight water content and saturated weight LNAPL content of the media utilized in the study were determined to be 13.45% and 11.3%, respectively, based on the formulas applied. The higher saturated weight moisture content in comparison to the saturated weight LNAPL content can be attributed to the inherent properties of LNAPL. LNAPL, being a hydrophobic liquid, exhibits low surface tension, which leads to diminished intermolecular interactions and suboptimal contact with the pore walls. Therefore, the weight oil contents of the samples were 5%, 6%, 7%, 9%, 10%, 11%, and 13%. The weight water contents of the test soil columns were 4%, 6%, 8%, 10%, 12%, 14%, and 16%. As shown in Table 3, a total of 49 groups of experiments were conducted using the orthogonal experimental method, and each group of experiments was repeated three times to avoid the effect of chance error. In the experiment, the movement of LNAPLs was simulated under different water content conditions. The whole soil column system test group could be divided into three types: an oil–gas two-phase system, an oil–water two-phase system, and an oil–water–gas three-phase system. The variation of water content on the adsorption rate, as well as the migration rate of LNAPLs under unsaturated conditions, was analyzed.
The experimental procedure is shown in Figure 4. First, we prepared and filled the sand samples. Before filling the sand samples, however, we applied petroleum jelly (Vaseline) to the inner walls of the acrylic glass sand sample columns to avoid the wall effect. The sand columns were filled with different water contents, with the porosity calculated according to the height and mass of the filled sample; these samples were put into the test sand columns, sealed, and placed in a standard curing chamber (temperature (20 ± 2) °C and relative humidity ≥ 95%) for 24 h to facilitate the wetting of sand samples. A gravel layer was also placed in the upper and lower layers of the sand sample to prevent the loss of sand particles. In the third step, the volume of quantitative LNAPL designed by the experimental program was passed through a peristaltic pump. The amount of diesel fuel flowing through the graduated tank was recorded, and the amount of diesel oil flowing out was recorded through the graduated base. When the diesel fuel stopped flowing out of the sand column, we opened the base drain to discharge the pollutants and collected them into a beaker for data comparison.
The flow of oil–water two-phase fluid in porous media is an immiscible multiphase flow problem. The residual saturation within the unsaturated zone is the LNAPL saturation attained after initially saturated soil is allowed to drain by gravity to equilibrium [26]. Generally, the residual saturation will be lower within the unsaturated zone compared to the saturated zone. Thus, the LNAPL becomes an intermediate wetting fluid, which allows more of the fluid to drain from the soil than the saturated zone, where the gas phase is small, and the LNAPL is the non-wetting fluid. This study considered the water phase as the wetting phase fluid, the oil phase as the non-wetting phase, and the injection method of replacing the wetting phase with the non-wetting phase was employed. The residual LNAPL content in the soil is an important feature parameter in the oil–water two-phase flow system, defined as:
Qr = (QQi)/Q
where Qr is the residual LNAPL by the soil, Qi is the outflow volume of i phase fluid, and Q is the initial flow rate of i phase fluid.

3. Experimental Results and Analysis

3.1. Relationship Between Infiltration Rate and Acting Force

Chukwuemeka et al. [27] investigated LNAPL migration under capillary forces and gravity by simulating two different LNAPL leakage patterns with COMSOL numerical simulations and concluded that downward migration of pollutants by surface infiltration lasts longer, while upward migration by subsurface imbibition lasts until equilibrium is reached between gravity and capillary forces. Based on the existing literature, to analyze the effect of capillary force and gravity in the process of LNAPL migration, the relationships between LNAPL infiltration height, infiltration rate, and time were plotted and analyzed, and a residual analysis was performed in this work.
From Figure 5, the imbibition height of LNAPL was 17.8 cm at 3.7 h, reaching the inflection point of the rising height, at which point the rising rate dropped to the inflection point and the migration rate produced an L-shaped trend, indicating a nonlinear relationship with migration time. The infiltration height migrated up from 17.8 to 22.8 cm at 3.7–18.7 h. Although the migration rate decreased significantly, a continuous upward migration trend was still observed, attributed to the process of transport mainly under the action of capillary forces. Capillary pressure is high at the beginning of imbibition. Over time, the oil content of the soil medium gradually increases, generating the downward force of gravity. At the beginning of imbibition, capillary force is greater than the gravity of LNAPL downward migration. When the imbibition height reaches 22.3 cm, capillary force gradually becomes balanced with gravity, but because the test medium used was dry sand, capillary force always exists in the soil column. Although the subsurface imbibition rate decreased, the imbibition height still rose.
It is found that the underground seepage height rises to 22.8 cm when the rise inflection point occurs; according to formula (1), it can be seen that the rise height is affected by the surface tension and density; the smaller the surface tension, the greater the density, the lower the rise height. If the surface tension of diesel is less than water, the rise height will be reduced, but if the density of diesel is less than water, the capillary rise height should be increased. It can be seen that in both positive and negative effects, surface tension dominates the position. In addition, chain reactions occur between diesel macromolecules, leading to an increase in the contact angle between the sand samples, resulting in a slower migration rate.
LNAPL mainly migrates vertically at the beginning of the leak and gradually occupies the pores of the soil to form a connected state after the leak. The analysis in Figure 6 shows that when diesel fuel is passed into the soil column from top to bottom, it migrates downward mainly under the action of gravity, and the surface infiltration depth increases with time in a positive linear relationship, while the infiltration rate increases with time in a negative linear relationship. At 8 min, the LNAPL descent depth was 50 mm, and the descent rate was 6.25 mm/min. The descent depth was 83 mm at 15 min, and the descent rate decreased to 5.53 mm/min. Subsequently, the surface infiltration depth increased from 104 to 159 mm between 20 and 40 min. Although descent depth was not proportional, the overall migration was straight up because, during LNAPL downward migration, as discharge flow increased, the LNAPL pressure gradually increased and occupied the pores. Strong gravity and capillary force formed an oil phase channel. During downward migration, there is always upward capillary force, so the descent and time have a nonproportional relationship. Thus, the surface infiltration model was adopted below for the LNAPL migration process to better represent the relationship between the LNAPL migration process and water and oil content.

3.2. LNAPL Precipitation Law

Applying the above experiment method, each set of experiments was repeated several times using orthogonal array testing, and the sets with oil flow during the experiment process were recorded as √ and those without as ×. Only when the water–LNAPL in the medium’s pores reaches the critical value of two-phase saturation can free-phase LNAPL continue to migrate downward, and the greater the water content in the medium, the smaller this critical value becomes. The study found a certain linear relationship with the critical value of water–oil two-phase saturation, as shown by the red line in Table 4, using Origin software (v.10.1) for curve fitting and analysis of the critical oil flow data to obtain the exponential function of oil content y and water content x under oil flow, i.e.,
y = 15.28 0.77 x
where y is the oil content, x is the water content, and the fitted regression equation R 2 = 0.96, indicating that the measured data fit well with the fitted function curve.
LNAPL exists in the unsaturated zone in the following forms: free-flowing liquid phase, adsorbed phase (adsorbed on the surface of soil particles), dissolved phase (dissolved in water), and volatile phase (volatilized in the atmosphere). Table 4 shows that oil flow has a lower triangular 0-shaped matrix. When the LNAPL and water content in the soil are above the linearly fitted oil flow point, part of the LNAPL occurs in the soil as an adsorbed phase, and part of it migrates to the groundwater as a free phase, causing groundwater pollution. When the water content of the contaminated site is below 14%, or the oil content is below 11%, LNAPL will exist in a solid phase through adsorption. When the water content in the experiment was greater than 14%, or the oil content was greater than 11%, LNAPL pollutants appeared at the bottom of the glass wall of the test device. LNAPLs migrated to the saturated zone.

3.3. Residual LNAPL

The results of the soil residual LNAPL content versus water content at different water contents are shown in Figure 7. The results show that when a certain volume of diesel went into the medium, Qr decreased gradually with increasing water content in the medium, and the relationship between them was nonlinear. When the medium’s water content was above 12%, and the initial quantity of oil exceeded 5%, part of the diesel oil in the soil occurs in a solid phase by residual, and part of the LNAPL migrates from the unsaturated zone to the saturated zone via vertical migration. As the water content increased, the residual oil content in the soil column gradually decreased. When the water content of the medium was greater than 12%, the residual LNAPL content in the medium decreased further.
The results (Figure 8) show that when the water content of the medium is fixed, as the oil content through the medium increases, Qr gradually decreases, and a nonlinear relationship was observed between the two. As the oil content increased, the residual LNAPL content in the soil column gradually decreased. When the water content exceeded 12%, and the initial oil content exceeded 5%, the residual LNAPL content of the test medium was less than 40%, and the residual LNAPL content in the medium with different water content decreased gradually as the oil content increased. This indicates that at least 60% of the LNAPL migrates downward in a free phase state. Notably, when the medium does not reach saturation, the large pores in the medium are filled by the water phase, but the small and medium pores are not filled. When LNAPL leakage occurs, a fluid channel forms, and as the LNAPL leakage increases, the pores in the medium will gradually be filled by the oil phase, eventually migrating to the saturated zone under the action of gravity and capillary forces. Soil water content during downward migration has a strong influence on the occurrence state of LNAPL.
Figure 9 displays a surface chart of the relationship between water content, oil content, and oil flow. Analysis of Figure 10 indicates that when the initial discharge rate of LNAPL is fixed, the water content has a greater influence on the oil flow, and the oil flow increases as the water content increases, but when the water content reaches 16%, the oil flow reaches 85%, attributed to the downward migration of LNAPL under the action of gravity. As time passes, the water phase in the soil column is gradually replaced by the oil phase, which gradually increases oil saturation in the soil column and increases the pressure of the oil phase; however, with the migration of LNAPL, the diesel saturation in the soil column will not reach complete saturation due to the hysteresis saturation effect under the action of capillary force.

3.4. Relationship Between LNAPL Movement Rate and Water Content

Figure 10 presents the relationship between LNAPL flow rate and time under different water content conditions. Analysis of the data in the Figure indicates that the LNAPL flow rate increases slowly with time when the water content is 4%, 6%, and 8%, and there is a power function (math) relationship between the two. The fitting curve is y = a × xb. Nevertheless, as the water content in the soil column gradually increased, the LNAPL flow rate decreased and then increased at the water contents of 10%, 12%, 14%, and 16%. The nonlinear fitting curve was y = y0 + A × sin (π × (xxc)/w). The details of the nonlinear fitting functions for different water content conditions are provided in Table 5.
To better understand the influence of water content in the soil column on the diesel flow rate, the duration of the experiment was increased, and the water content was found to have less effect on the LNAPL flow rate per unit time below 8%. After the water content exceeded 8%, the LNAPL flow rate decreased and then increased with an increase in time. At 10% water content, the diesel flow rate was 135 mL in 362.33 s when the flow rate inflection point occurred. The flow rate increased beyond this time and decreased at 362.33 s. When the water content was 12%, the diesel flow rate reached its lowest point at 204.05 s of 65 mL, and the flow rate exhibited an increasing trend beyond this point. When the water content was 14%, the diesel flow rate reached its lowest point at 783.47 s of 90 mL, and the flow rate presented a nonlinear increasing relationship beyond this point. At 16% water content, the diesel flow rate reached its lowest point at 55 mL in 1605.45 s, and the long-term flow rate had a nonlinear growth relationship with time beyond this point.
Thus, the greater the oil content of the medium, the less the migration of diesel and the slower the migration rate because in the oil–water two-phase flow in the porous medium, due to the influence of interfacial tension, a transition zone forms between the oil–water interfaces, whose size is affected by fluid. The upper edge of the transition zone has good changing interface characteristics. The distribution of both water and oil phases above the transition zone is uniform, and the oil phase below the transition zone is influenced by the water phase. The pressure difference at the oil–water interface is considerable, so LNAPL will migrate horizontally due to the large pressure difference. As a result, the LNAPL flow rate first decreases and then increases when the water content exceeds 10%, but as the LNAPL discharge rate increases, oil pressure increases, and the movement of the oil phase breaks through the tension at the oil–water interface.

4. Discussion

The present study provides a comprehensive analysis of the impact of water content on the migration of light nonaqueous phase liquids (LNAPLs) in sandy soil. The findings contribute to the understanding of LNAPL behavior in the subsurface environment, which is crucial for developing effective remediation strategies for contaminated sites. The experimental results clearly demonstrate that water content plays a pivotal role in LNAPL migration. In the unsaturated zone, LNAPL migration is influenced by both capillary action and gravity, with the latter becoming more dominant as the water content decreases. This observation is consistent with previous studies that highlighted the dual influence of capillary forces and gravity on LNAPL movement [27]. However, our study extends these findings by providing a quantitative relationship between water content and LNAPL migration rates under controlled laboratory conditions.
The residual saturation of LNAPL in the soil was found to be negatively correlated with water content, indicating that as water content increases, the amount of LNAPL retained in the soil decreases. This finding is significant as it suggests that in wetter conditions, a greater proportion of LNAPL may migrate into the groundwater, posing a higher risk of contamination. This relationship between water content and residual LNAPL saturation has implications for the design of monitoring wells and the timing of remediation efforts. The nonlinear migration patterns observed in this study, particularly the L-shaped trend during subsurface imbibition, underscore the complexity of LNAPL movement in heterogeneous soil structures. These patterns may be attributed to the varying degrees of soil saturation and the interaction between LNAPL and water within the soil matrix. The nonlinear relationship between LNAPL migration rate and time suggests that migration processes are not constant and are influenced by changing soil conditions, such as water content and oil content.
While our study aligns with previous research in terms of the influence of water content on LNAPL migration, it offers new insights into the specific mechanisms governing this process in sandy soils. For example, our findings regarding the residual LNAPL saturation in different water content conditions contribute to a more nuanced understanding of LNAPL retention and release in the subsurface environment [26]. Despite the valuable insights gained from this study, there are limitations that should be acknowledged. The experiments were conducted under controlled laboratory conditions, which may not fully replicate the complexity of field conditions. Future research should aim to validate these findings in real-world settings and consider the impact of other factors, such as soil type, temperature, and the presence of other contaminants.

5. Conclusions

This study investigated the effect of water content on the occurrence and migration of LNAPL based on indoor one-dimensional soil column experiments. The main conclusions are as follows:
  • In sandy media, the migration rate of LNAPL presented an L-shaped trend during subsurface imbibition and a nonlinear relationship with migration time, while the migration rate during surface infiltration increased linearly with time;
  • In the homogeneous unsaturated state, the LNAPL residual rate was negatively correlated with water content and positively correlated with oil content. With the increase in the amount of leaked oil, 40% of the leaked LNAPL is sorbed within the soil;
  • When the water content in the medium was below 14%, and the oil content was below 11%, LNAPLs mainly occurred as solid phases in the soil unsaturated zone. As the water content increased, the residual rate of LNAPLs gradually decreased and eventually realized the oil saturation point;
  • After the water content of the medium exceeded 8%, the LNAPLs were subjected to oil–water interfacial tension, with the flow rate migrating to the saturated zone first decreasing and then increasing, displaying a nonlinear growth relationship.

Author Contributions

G.Z.: Conceptualization, formulation, or evolution of overarching research goals and aims. J.C.: Data curation, Writing—Original draft preparation. L.L.: Writing—Reviewing and Editing. H.Z. (Hongli Zhang): Data Curation, Management activities to annotate. H.L.: Supervision, Oversight, and leadership responsibility for the research activity planning and execution. H.Z. (Hepeng Zhang): Validation, Verification. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41972261), The 15th Graduate Innovation Ability Improvement Project of North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power (NCWUYC-202315072), and the Belt and Road Special Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering (2021490511).

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

Throughout the writing of this dissertation, I have received a great deal of support and assistance. I would particularly like to acknowledge my team members, Leicheng Li and Yu Liu, for their wonderful collaboration and patient support. I would also like to thank my tutor, Guizhang Zhao, for their valuable guidance throughout my studies. You provided me with the tools that I needed to choose the right direction and successfully complete my dissertation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Palomino, A.M.; Grubb, D.G. Recovery of dodecane, octane and toluene spills in sandpacks using ethanol. J. Hazard. Mater. 2004, 110, 39–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, J.; Cao, X.; Sui, H.; He, L.; Li, X. Overview of Remediation Technologies for Petroleum-Contaminated Soils. Acta Pet. Sin. (Pet. Process. Sect.) 2017, 35, 811–833. [Google Scholar]
  3. Yang, J.; Jiang, W.; Liu, Y.; Feng, Q. Influence of porosity and temperature on light non-aqueous phase liquid diffusion in soils. Chemosphere 2023, 333, 138744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ma, Y.; Zheng, X.; Anderson, S.H.; Lu, J.; Feng, X. Diesel oil volatilization processes affected by selected porous media. Chemosphere 2014, 99, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Cheng, J.; Zhao, G.; Li, L.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y. Migration mechanism and remediation technology of light non-aqueous phase liquids in petroleum-contaminated soil. Pet. Refin. Eng. 2023, 53, 17–20. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yuhong, F.; Yaci, L.; Yasong, L.; Xilin, B.; Pengwei, Z. Prospect of groundwater pollution remediation methods and technologies in China. Geol. China 2022, 49, 420–434. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lim, M.W.; Von Lau, E.; Poh, P.E. A comprehensive guide of remediation technologies for oil contaminated soil—Present works and future directions. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2016, 109, 14–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Amélie, C.; Fabrice, G.; Stéfan, C.; Hossein, D.; Jacques, D.; Pierre, F. A critical review of the influence of groundwater level fluctuations and temperature on LNAPL contaminations in the context of climate change. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 806, 150412. [Google Scholar]
  9. Jing, Z.; Minghao, P.; Chuping, C.; Ao, W.; Yongqi, W.; Hang, L. Migration Law of LNAPLs in the Groundwater Level Fluctuation Zone Affected by Freezing and Thawing. Water 2022, 14, 1289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Atteia, O.; Palmier, C.; Schäfer, G. On the influence of groundwater table fluctuations on oil thickness in a well related to an LNAPL contaminated aquifer. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2019, 223, 103476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, J.; Li, Y.; Xu, J.; Kamon, M. Testing of NAPL simulator to predict migration of a light nonaqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) under water table fluctuation in a sandy medium. J. Cent. South Univ. 2014, 21, 317–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sleep, B.E.; Sehayek, L.; Chien, C.C. A Modeling and experimental study of light nonaqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) accumulation in wells and LNAPL recovery from wells. Water Resour. Res. 2000, 36, 3535–3545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hu, L.; Xing, W.; Wu, Z. Numerical simulation of non-aqueous phase liquids migration in porous media. Rock Soil Mech. 2007, 28, 951–955. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaveh, S.L.; Andrew, K.; Rayner, J.L.; Davis, G.B. Quantifying the benefits of in-time and in-place responses to remediate acute LNAPL release incidents. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 287, 112356. [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhenhui, Z.; Zongjun, G.; Xiaohai, Z.; Chen, Y.; Ke, H. Vertical migration of LNAPL(diesel)in porous medium. Chin. J. Environ. Eng. 2015, 9, 1842–1848. [Google Scholar]
  16. Wu, X.; Tang, J.T. Experimental study on saturation of diesel-water two-phase flow. J. Hydraul. Eng. 2000, 10, 12–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Xing, W. Study on Migration Behavior of LNAPLs in Soils; Tsinghua University: Beijing, China, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, R. Experimental Study on Nonaqueous Phase Liquids Transport in Soils; Northwest A&F Universit: Xianyang, China, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  19. Rui, Z.; Ziyi, W.; Jie, L.; Shida, Z.; Jiawei, L.; Kexue, H.; Yuepeng, L.; Jinsheng, W. Retention effect and mode of capillary zone on the migration process of LNAPL pollutants based on experimental exploration. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2023, 253, 114669. [Google Scholar]
  20. Huan, S.; Yong, H.; Illman, W.A.; Yue, S.; Kehan, M. Migration behaviour of LNAPL in fractures filled with porous media: Laboratory experiments and numerical simulations. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2023, 253, 104118. [Google Scholar]
  21. Govindarajan, D.; Banerjee, A.; Chandrakumar, N.; Raghunathan, R. Magnetic resonance imaging of enhanced mobility of light non aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) during drying of water wet porous media. J. Contam. Hydrol. 2020, 234, 103683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Teramoto, E.H.; Isler, E.; Polese, L.; Baessa, M.P.M.; Chang, H.K. LNAPL saturation derived from laser induced fluorescence method. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 683, 762–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pan, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Yu, Y.; Tong, Y.; Wu, W.; Zhou, Y.; Hou, W.; Yang, J. Three-dimensional migration and resistivity characteristics of crude oil in heterogeneous soil layers. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 268, 115309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Chala, A.T.; Matula, S.; Báťková, K.; Doležal, F. Evaluation of methods for water and non-volatile LNAPL content measurement in porous media. Soil Water Res. 2019, 14, 47–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Li, Z.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, G.; Zhou, H.; Liu, S.; Liu, W. Study on the capillary rise characteristics of light non-aqueous phase liquid based on vertical pipe method. Hydrogeol. Eng. Geol. 2023, 04, 105–114. [Google Scholar]
  26. Hoag, G.; Marley, M. Gasoline Residual Saturation in Unsaturated Uniform Aquifer Materials. J. Environ. Eng. 1986, 112, 586–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chukwuemeka, O.; Olaobaju, E.A.; Amro, M.M. Experimental and numerical assessment of light non-aqueous phase liquid (LNAPL) subsurface migration behavior in the vicinity of groundwater table. Environ. Technol. Innov. 2021, 23, 101573. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Light nonaqueous phase fluid (LNAPL) infiltration migration.
Figure 1. Light nonaqueous phase fluid (LNAPL) infiltration migration.
Applsci 14 09640 g001
Figure 2. Laboratory model setup.
Figure 2. Laboratory model setup.
Applsci 14 09640 g002
Figure 3. Surface infiltration (left); subsurface imbibition (right).
Figure 3. Surface infiltration (left); subsurface imbibition (right).
Applsci 14 09640 g003
Figure 4. Schematic of experimental steps.
Figure 4. Schematic of experimental steps.
Applsci 14 09640 g004
Figure 5. Subsurface imbibition height, rate, and time relationships. (a). Rising height versus time, (b). Rising height fitted residual plot, (c). Rising rate versus time, (d). Rising rate fitting residual plot.
Figure 5. Subsurface imbibition height, rate, and time relationships. (a). Rising height versus time, (b). Rising height fitted residual plot, (c). Rising rate versus time, (d). Rising rate fitting residual plot.
Applsci 14 09640 g005
Figure 6. Surface infiltration rate versus time. (a). Descent depth versus time, (b). Descent depth fitted residual plot, (c). Descent rate versus time, (d). Descent rate residual plot.
Figure 6. Surface infiltration rate versus time. (a). Descent depth versus time, (b). Descent depth fitted residual plot, (c). Descent rate versus time, (d). Descent rate residual plot.
Applsci 14 09640 g006
Figure 7. Residual rate versus water content.
Figure 7. Residual rate versus water content.
Applsci 14 09640 g007
Figure 8. Residual rate versus oil content.
Figure 8. Residual rate versus oil content.
Applsci 14 09640 g008
Figure 9. Surface chart of the relationship between water content, oil content, and oil flow.
Figure 9. Surface chart of the relationship between water content, oil content, and oil flow.
Applsci 14 09640 g009
Figure 10. LNAPL flow rate versus time.
Figure 10. LNAPL flow rate versus time.
Applsci 14 09640 g010
Table 1. Media property index.
Table 1. Media property index.
Fine sandPercentage of particle size (%)2–0.5 mm0.5–0.25 mm0.25–0.075 mm0.075–0.005 mm<0.005 mm
7.727.251.37.26.6
Curvature factorSaturated moisture content (%)Saturated oil content (%)Average particle size (mm)Unevenness factorDry Density (g × cm−3)
7.7925.43221.2210.17531.711.63
Table 2. Basic physical properties of diesel.
Table 2. Basic physical properties of diesel.
Diesel TypeDensity (g/mL)Dynamic Viscosity (cst)Surface Tension (dyne/cm)Ignition Point (°C)Boiling Point (°C)Kinematic Viscosity (mm2/s)
0#0.842.5427.8220180–3703.92
Table 3. Experimental program.
Table 3. Experimental program.
Test NumberWater Content (%)Oil Content
(%)
Test NumberWater Content (%)Oil Content
(%)
1#~7#4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16529#~35#4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 1610
8#~14#4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16636#~42#4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 1611
15#~21#4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16743#~49#4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 1613
22#~28#4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 169
Table 4. Experimental results.
Table 4. Experimental results.
Applsci 14 09640 i001
Table 5. LNAPL flow rate and water content fitting functions.
Table 5. LNAPL flow rate and water content fitting functions.
Water Content%Fitting FunctionabR2
4y = a × xb5.191.010.989
61.281.630.993
83.773.380.957
Water content%Fitting functiony0xcwAR2
10y = y0+ A × sin(pi × (x− xc)/w)0.01−144.6356.70.00390.998
120.015−85.9554.230.00870.952
140.005−402.89356.240.00170.922
160.001−290.58559.640.00060.945
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zhao, G.; Cheng, J.; Li, L.; Zhang, H.; Li, H.; Zhang, H. Effect of Water Content on Light Nonaqueous Phase Fluid Migration in Sandy Soil. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 9640. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219640

AMA Style

Zhao G, Cheng J, Li L, Zhang H, Li H, Zhang H. Effect of Water Content on Light Nonaqueous Phase Fluid Migration in Sandy Soil. Applied Sciences. 2024; 14(21):9640. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219640

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zhao, Guizhang, Jiale Cheng, Leicheng Li, Hongli Zhang, Hongliang Li, and Hepeng Zhang. 2024. "Effect of Water Content on Light Nonaqueous Phase Fluid Migration in Sandy Soil" Applied Sciences 14, no. 21: 9640. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219640

APA Style

Zhao, G., Cheng, J., Li, L., Zhang, H., Li, H., & Zhang, H. (2024). Effect of Water Content on Light Nonaqueous Phase Fluid Migration in Sandy Soil. Applied Sciences, 14(21), 9640. https://doi.org/10.3390/app14219640

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop