Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Sleep Disorder Diagnosis on Mortality in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
An Overview of Japanese Encephalitis in Australia: Trends, Impact and Interventions
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Investigation of the Heat Transfer Characteristics and Wall Film Formation of Spray Impingement in SCR Systems
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Evaluation of Healthy Eating Scale for Patients with Pre-Diabetes Using Rasch Analysis
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Factors Associated with Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco Use, Intention to Quit, and the Number of Cigarettes Smoked among Adults with High Blood Pressure in a Rural District of Bangladesh

by
Fakir M. Amirul Islam
1,2,* and
Joanne Williams
3
1
Department of Health Science and Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia
2
Organization for Rural Community Development (ORCD), Dariapur, Narail 7500, Bangladesh
3
School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(9), 5355; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095355
Submission received: 2 January 2023 / Revised: 2 March 2023 / Accepted: 17 April 2023 / Published: 25 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Biostatistics for Health Science and Epidemiology)

Abstract

:
The current research is an initial investigation aimed at reporting the factors associated with smoking tobacco, smokeless tobacco (SLT) use, the number of cigarettes smoked, and the intention to quit smoking. A total of 307 adults aged 30 to 75 years with high blood pressure were recruited as part of a cluster RCT from a rural area in Bangladesh. The outcome variables included the number of cigarettes smoked per day, intentions to quit smoking, and SLT use. We used Rasch analysis and regression analysis. A low level of education and older age were associated with smoking tobacco and SLT use, respectively. The 62 smokers smoked 9.6 cigarettes or bidi on average per day, and 54 (87%) knew that smoking was associated with cancer. Overall, 41.6% of farmers compared to 58.9% of employees and 53% of people with no education compared to 75% of people with a higher education intended to quit smoking and SLT use. Our research contributes to the evidence that increasing education increases the intention to quit smoking and identifies population groups that could benefit from targeted public health campaigns. Health education programs are needed to increase motivation to quit smoking, especially among farmers, and to reduce SLT use among women and elderly people.

1. Introduction

Globally, 1.1 billion people smoke tobacco, and 8 million people die from tobacco use yearly. Of these deaths, 80% occur in low/middle-income countries [1,2]. Approximately 400 million tobacco users live in South East Asia (SEA), which results in 1.2 million deaths annually [3].
Tobacco use causes adverse health effects, such as stroke and coronary heart disease [4], and it is a leading cause of different types of cancer [5,6]. Smokeless tobacco (SLT) also causes serious health problems, including cancers [7] and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) [8,9,10,11,12,13]. Quitting smoking or discontinuing tobacco smoking lowers the risk of cancers, diabetes, and all causes of mortality and has significant and immediate health benefits [13]. Thus, quitting tobacco smoking is instrumental in reducing tobacco-attributable deaths and diseases [14,15]. The intention to quit smoking is considered the first step before ceasing smoking behavior [16]. However, research has suggested that smokers, especially heavy smokers, are more addicted and less likely to quit, as they are unwilling or unable to quit smoking [17,18,19].
To reduce smoking prevalence, people need to be aware of all its detrimental effects on health, as this may increase negative attitudes towards smoking and intentions to quit [1,13]. Previous studies have reported a strong association between increased knowledge of the detrimental effects of smoking and a reduction in smoking and increases in cessation behavior and long-term abstinence from smoking [20,21,22]. Older people and current smokers with appropriate knowledge of the harmful effects of smoking on health [23] and with higher education levels [24,25] have been associated with higher intentions to quit smoking.
In a large study among patients with pulmonary tuberculosis [25], 52% of smokers intended to quit smoking and the intention to quit smoking was eight times higher among professional people compared to manual workers. The addiction level, smoking frequency, past quitting attempts, length of abstinence during past attempts, and motivation to quit are the predictors for successful quitting [26]. Studies have suggested that intention has been shown to account for 12% of the variance in quitting success rates, and a strong desire to quit was associated with a greater likelihood of quitting smoking [27,28]. However, it is unclear whether the motivation to quit smoking is successful in quitting smoking. A systematic review [29] of 37 studies encompassing over 15,000 smokers concluded that motivational interviews to help people stop smoking were not successful in increasing the intention to quit smoking. The review also found no improvements in mental health and well-being by smoking cessation. E-cigarettes have been proposed as a possible alternative to quitting smoking, and their use has rapidly increased in recent years [30]. Evidence suggests that an increase in the use of e-cigarettes is effective at enabling quitting smoking. For example, in the UK, the use of e-cigarettes rose from 1.7% in 2012 to 7.1% in 2019, and at the same time, smoking rates dropped from 19.6 to 14.7% [31]. However, the use of e-cigarettes is not recommended, and their increased use has been reported to contribute to social inequalities [32,33]. Therefore, smoking cessation is always challenging and needs designed interventions based on risk stratification.
Among women in Asian countries, including Bangladesh, India, and Pakistan, attitudes towards SLT use are generally positive [34]. SLT use is often considered to be less harmful than smoking tobacco, which increases the likelihood of using SLT [34,35]. One study found that the cessation of SLT use was associated with a significant increase in anxiety and oral pain [36], and government quit lines and websites [37] are not always accessible to low-income people who want to quit SLT. These factors contribute to the most vulnerable groups being less likely to reduce or stop using SLT. However, one-time education sessions to help American Indian SLT users to quit showed that 13.5% reduced their use [38].
As in other low/middle-income countries (LMICs), smoking tobacco and SLT use in Bangladesh make significant contributions to the public health burdens of morbidity and disability and increase community costs [39,40,41]. Tobacco kills 161,253 people each year (19% of all deaths) and accounts for 41% of CVD deaths and 20% of cancer deaths [42]. Bangladesh has been reported to be one of the top ten high-smoking countries in the world, with the prevalence of smoking at 40.56% [42]. The prevalence of tobacco smoking has been consistently found to be higher in men, and SLT use was higher in women and older adults [3,39,42,43,44]. The prevalence of tobacco smoking has been reported to be higher in labor-based occupations, in poorer people, among slum and tribal populations, and in people with low levels of education. These findings suggest a greater health burden from tobacco use among the disadvantaged groups [34,35,43,45].
In recent years, the prevalence of tobacco smoking has been decreasing but at a slower rate than in previous decades [46]. Nargis et al. [47] used nationally represented data from 2009 and 2012 to inform the International Tobacco Control (ITC) policy in Bangladesh and reported that the prevalence of any tobacco use decreased from 45.1% to 38.5%, and smokeless tobacco decreased from 31.5% to 23.5% in rural areas. Bangladesh was the first signatory of the World Health Organization (WHO) Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (WHO FCTC), signed in 2004. These tobacco control measures are expected to reduce smoking, or at the very least, to arrest the potential rise in smoking prevalence observed in disadvantaged groups [34,35,43,45,47]. Intention to quit smoking or reduce tobacco use, including decreasing the number of cigarettes or bidi, depends on multiple factors. Previous studies [48,49,50] have reported a range of factors associated with quitting smoking, such as the area of residence, number of cigarettes/bidis smoked per day, education, age of starting to smoke, older age, type of smokers, attempting to quit in the past year, perceiving health benefit from quitting smoking, and the number of smoker friends. Hakim et al. [51] conducted a large study among people aged 15 years or older. They found that almost half of the people attempted to quit smoking, and people who smoked 10–19 cigarettes per day were less likely to quit. A recent study [52] reported that tobacco use had reduced due to the price increase in tobacco products due to the implementation of a tobacco tax increase. This reduction was higher among rural households and people with less income.
Driezen et al. [49] studied the determinants of intentions to quit smoking among adult smokers in Bangladesh and reported that 36% had the intention to quit smoking in the future. The outcome measure for the study was “any intention to quit”, measured by a dichotomized answer from a single question that provided limited information about the intention to quit smoking. The study used a tool that captured a wide range of questions for measuring the intention to quit smoking and calculated the combined logit score using Rasch analysis [53] to provide a deeper understanding of the intention to quit smoking. The study also demonstrated the usefulness of the application of Rasch analysis in reporting the combined score converted from a categorical scale into a continuous scale.
Islam et al. [54] conducted a cluster-randomized controlled trial for lowering blood pressure by changing lifestyle among people with high blood pressure. One of the study’s secondary objectives was related to the initial investigation of the intention of quitting smoking. The objectives of the current research were to investigate (i) the factors associated with smoking, smokeless tobacco use, the number of cigarettes smoked per day, and the pack-years of cigarettes smoked per week, (ii) the awareness of smoking-related diseases, (iii) intention to quit tobacco use and factors associated with intention and motivation to quit smoking and SLT.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Subjects and Sample Size

Bangladesh has a population of 163 million people, divided among 64 districts. Each district has 3–8 Upazilas or sub-districts, and each sub-district is divided into 10–15 Unions, which consist of 15–20 villages [55]. A cross-sectional Bangladesh Population-based Diabetes and Eye Study (BPDES) was conducted in 2012, and 3104 adults aged 30–80 in the Banshgram Union of Narail district participated. The BPDES study has been presented in full previously [56,57]. Of the 1256 BPDES participants with hypertension, 307 were randomly recruited into an RCT with the primary aim of lowering their blood pressure by changing lifestyles [54]. The participants in the RCT were recruited between December 2020 and January 2021. Although the data collection period was during the COVID-19 lockdown, the study area was one of the least affected areas in Bangladesh and had fewer restrictions; therefore, data collection was possible by maintaining social distancing between the participants and researchers.
People who participated in the BPDES were eligible for this study if their clinic-measured blood pressure was greater or equal to 130/80 mm Hg and they were not on medication. Participants with controlled blood pressure, defined as <130/80, who were taking antihypertensive medicines for a minimum of six weeks were also eligible [57]. We excluded people who had advanced cardiovascular disease or severe health problems or who did not agree to give written consent to participate in the study.
Factors, especially sociodemographic factors associated with smoking and the use of smokeless tobacco, intention to quit, and the number of cigarettes smoked, were secondary outcomes for the RCT.

2.2. Sample Size

The data from 307 participants with hypertension were collected at baseline as part of a cluster RCT to look at the impact of lifestyle changes on blood pressure. This research is an initial investigation into the intention to quit smoking in smokers with hypertension and whether sociodemographic factors are associated with quitting smoking. A previous intervention study in Bangladesh [45] reported that 36% of participants intended to quit smoking, and a cross-sectional study in Vietnam [58] reported 50% of smokers intended to quit smoking. According to these studies, with 10% precision and a 95% confidence interval, the required sample size was at least 97 participants.

2.3. Recruitment and Data Collection

In collaboration with investigators from the Swinburne University of Technology, a local non-government organization in the Narail district of Bangladesh, the Organization for Rural Community Development, recruited the participants. The Organization for Rural Community Development investigators and trained data collectors communicated with the potential participants by telephone or direct contact. Once potential voluntary participants were identified, their blood pressure levels were taken to assess their eligibility for the study. The data were collected through face-to-face interviews, and equal numbers of men and women were recruited. The chief investigator conducted four Zoom meetings to train the data collectors and local investigators on the steps to be followed to conduct the research. A pilot study of ten adults who were not included in the main research was conducted before the final data collection to familiarize the data collectors with all study procedures and to ensure they were conversant with the questionnaire. The Organization for Rural Community Development’s investigator monitored the data collection process for quality assurance. The Organization for Rural Community Development investigator revisited 10% of the households to cross-check data quality.

2.4. Primary Outcome Measures

The primary outcome measures were:
  • Prevalence of tobacco smoking and SLT use;
  • The number of cigarettes per day and pack-year of smoking per week;
  • Knowledge of smoking-related diseases and intention and plans to quit smoking among people who smoke tobacco;
  • Intention to quit SLT use among people who use SLT.
The smokers were asked if smoking caused any diseases, and if the response was “yes”, they were asked to identify two diseases they considered strongly associated with tobacco smoking. Intentions and plans for quitting smoking were assessed using the self-reported smoking cessation motivation questionnaire (Q-MAT) [59]. Seven items, including their intention to quit smoking, their feelings about being a smoker, plans for the cessation of smoking, and the effort of quitting smoking, were used to report the overall intention to quit smoking.
Possible answers to the seven-item questionnaire were:
(i)
Item: Thinking about quitting smoking; possible answers: “Not at all”, “a little”, “a lot”, and “enormous”;
(ii)
Item: Stopping smoking will increase self-image; possible answers: “not at all”, “a little”, “a lot”, and “enormous”;
(iii)
Item: Thinking about stopping smoking at the moment; possible answers: “not at all”, “a little”, “a lot”, and “enormous”;
(iv)
Item: Feel unhappy; possible answers: “Never”, “sometimes”, and “often”;
(v)
Item: Plan to quit smoking in the next six months; possible answers: “Smoking as much”, “cut down a little”, and “cut down a lot”;
(vi)
Item: Plan to quit smoking in the next four weeks; possible answers: “Smoking as much”, “cut down a little”, and “cut down a lot”;
(vii)
Item: Tried to stop smoking; possible answers: “Never”, “once”, and “several times”.

2.5. Exposure Variables

The exposure variables included the following: three categories of age, including young adults younger than 40 years, adults aged 40 to 59 years, and adults aged 60 years or older; genders, categorized as male and female; level of education, categorized as no schooling, primary to high school (grade 1 to 9), secondary school certificate (SSC), or any higher-level education. The age groupings were selected as there were relatively few people under 40 years of age with hypertension (the eligibility criterion for inclusion in this study) and approximately equal numbers in the two higher age groups. Since most participants had no taxable income, a crude measure of socioeconomic status (SES) was classified as poor and middle class or rich, following Cheng et al. [60]. The participants were asked whether “over the last twelve months, in terms of household food consumption, how would they classify their socioeconomic status?” The possible answers were: (i) insufficient funds for the whole year, (ii) insufficient funds some of the time, (iii) neither deficit nor surplus (balance), or (iv) sufficient funds most of the time. These four categories were dichotomized by designating those who had insufficient funds at least some of the time, categories 1 and 2, as poor, and those who had neither deficit nor surplus (balance) or sufficient funds, categories 3 and 4, as middle class or rich. Occupations were categorized as farmers, homemakers, self-managed businesses, laborers (digging soils, pulling rickshaws, or any laborious work), and government and non-government employees.
Statistical Analysis
The participants’ demographic characteristics, including sex, age, level of education, and occupation, were calculated as frequencies and percentages. Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) after adjusting for covariates were used to represent the associations of sociodemographic factors with smoking and smokeless tobacco use. The mean number of cigarettes and pack-year of smoking per week with a 95% CI were determined after adjusting for covariates using the generalized linear model (GLM). In the case of association measures of the sociodemographic factors with smoking tobacco and the number of cigarettes smoked, only the male participants were selected not to inflate the association by female participants who were non-smokers. The frequencies and percentages of participants with an awareness of smoking-related diseases were calculated considering the number of smokers as the denominator, and the number of respondents naming the particular disease as the numerator. Items related to intention to quit or plan to quit smoking and SLT use were considered by each Likert scale category. Rasch analysis [61] was used to convert the Likert-scale responses of the intention to quit smoking to an interval scale to create a combined score from all the items. The combined score ranged from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates not probable, 100 indicates entirely likely, and 50 indicates an average probability of all items endorsing quitting smoking. For example, the question of whether they were thinking of quitting smoking at the moment had the following possible responses: “not at all”, “a little”, “a lot”, and “enormously”, where "enormously” meant they were leaning towards quitting smoking. Rasch analysis [61] was used to convert categorical responses of the awareness of quitting smoking to an interval scale to create a combined score from all the items. The combined score ranged from 0 to 100, where 0 indicates “no intention”, and 100 indicates 100% intention to quit smoking. The overall means and 95% confidence intervals for the influence of items on quitting smoking were calculated after adjusting for covariates using the generalized linear model (GLM). The covariates were age, gender, level of education, and occupation. Since the sample size was relatively small, we investigated the skewness and Kurtosis of the combined score. Statistical software SPSS (SPSS Inc., version 27) was used for the analysis. For Rasch analysis, RUMM (RUMM2030) [53] software was used.

3. Results

Approximately half of the participants were 40–59 years of age, half had a primary to high school level of education, and half were homemakers (Table 1).
Of 153 males, 62 (40.5%) smoked tobacco and 31 (20.3%) used SLT. Of 154 females, none smoked tobacco, and 56 (36.4%) used SLT. After adjusting for socio-demographic factors, education and age were significantly associated with smoking tobacco. For example, having no education was associated with a higher proportion of smoking, with an odds ratio (OR) of 3.76 and a 95% confidence interval (95% CI: 1.27, 11.1). Similarly, gender and age, but not education, were associated with SLT use. SLT use was more likely in women compared to men (OR 2.74; 95% CIs: 1.48, 5.09) and in people older than 60 years compared to people aged below 40 years (OR 3.78; 95% CIs: 1.26, 11.4). Socioeconomic status and occupation were not associated with smoking tobacco or SLT use (Table 2).
Among smokers, the mean (95% CI) number of cigarettes or bidi per day was 9.6 (5.8, 13.4), and packets of cigarettes or bidi per week were 5.3 (4.0, 6.6). Although older people and people with SSC or higher education levels consumed relatively fewer cigarettes or bidi, the results were not significant (Table 3).
When the smokers were asked to name two diseases that could be caused by smoking, 54 (87%) said cancer and 23 (37%) said heart attack. Only eight (13%) smokers were unable to identify any diseases, indicating that 87% of smokers knew that smoking caused disease (Table 4).
The questions on intentions, plans, and attitudes about quitting smoking or SLT use showed that more than 70% of the smokers and 60% of the SLT users had thought a lot about quitting. Of the smokers, 89% felt unhappy about being a smoker, and of the SLT users, 72% felt unhappy about being an SLT user. The majority of tobacco users reported that they were willing to cut down at least a little in the next six months. Most of the smokers and SLT users considered that their self-image could increase at least a little by quitting smoking or SLT use; 48% of the tobacco smokers and 26% of the SLT users had tried several times to quit smoking and SLT use, respectively (Table 5).
The skewness and Kurtosis of the combined score from the Rasch analysis revealed that a high proportion of people had an average endorsement of quitting smoking. The probability of the intentions, plans, and attitudes about quitting smoking was in the middle of the continuum. The mean (95% CI) probability was 50.4 (39.9, 60.9) for tobacco smoking, indicating that smokers were equally likely to continue or quit smoking. For SLT users, the mean probability of stopping was 64.0 (55.3, 72.7), suggesting that almost two-thirds would probably quit using SLT in the future. Farmers were less likely (probability of 41.6%) compared to employees (probability of 58.9%) to quit smoking, and 75% of people with an SSC-level education or above were likely to quit SLT use compared to 53% of people with no education (Table 6).
Smokers who could not mention any diseases caused by smoking were less likely to quit smoking (44% vs. 54%, p = 0.14) than those who could name two diseases.
The tobacco smokers were asked to mention the names of two diseases that are associated with tobacco smoking.

4. Discussion

The key elements for successful smoking cessation are people’s knowledge of the detrimental effects of smoking and their intentions or motivation for quitting smoking. The critical findings of this study are that most people know the detrimental effects of smoking, but based on a combined score from seven items related to quitting smoking, it is only 50% probable that people are willing to quit or plan to quit smoking. Compared to smoking, people are more likely to quit SLT use. Younger people, people with a low level of education, and farmers are less likely to quit smoking. However, younger people, along with people with a higher level of education, and businesspersons are more likely to quit using SLT.
In this study, the prevalence of current smoking was the highest in people aged 40–59 years and in people who had below a secondary school certificate (SSC) level of education. The higher prevalence of smoking in those 40–59 years of age indicates that most smokers are in the workforce, and this includes daily laborers or landowners, who have a higher prevalence of tobacco smoking [34,43,45]. The lower prevalence of smoking later in life, especially after 60 years of age, may be associated with poorer health, which is expected during the later stages of the lifespan. This may motivate people to stop smoking or to switch to other forms of tobacco consumption, such as SLT use. We found smokeless tobacco use was higher among people aged 60 years or older. Another reason older people have lower smoking rates is that people who smoke are more likely to die before they reach old age [62]. High rates of mortality in tobacco smokers can simultaneously account for decreased smoking prevalence and increased SLT use in older adults [34,35,43,45]. The lower percentage of tobacco smoking among older adults is also influenced by the fact that those who smoke tobacco are more likely to be successful at quitting smoking due to other health problems [63].
In this study, the overall intention to quit smoking or plans or efforts to quit smoking was in the middle of the continuum (50.4%), which is similar to previous findings [24,58,64,65,66,67]. For example, 52% of Hong Kong Chinese planned to quit [67], and 49.5% of men in a U.S. study [65] were willing to quit smoking. However, our study showed a lower percentage of people reporting their intention to quit smoking compared to some other studies. Of Korean adult smokers, 75% were planning to quit [68], and 65 to 81% of smokers in many developed Western countries intended to quit smoking [69]. The Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS) [24] and the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Policy Evaluation Bangladesh Survey [49] have reported that 51.4% of male participants and 36% of all participants, respectively, had planned to quit smoking. The GATS and ITC [24,49] were conducted among smokers aged 15 years or older after running a smoking cessation campaign for one year to determine the factors associated with quitting smoking. Although our study found a higher proportion of people with an intention to quit smoking than the ITC [49], it was similar to or lower than that in other studies [24,58,64,65,66,67,68,69]. The proportion intending to quit smoking in our study could be considered very low given that the participants all had chronic hypertension. Quitting smoking has substantial health and social benefits. It dramatically improves blood circulation in vascular systems and lung function, dramatically drops the risk of heart attack, stroke, and cancer, and increases overall physical fitness. Stopping smoking can improve personal lives, which greatly impacts overall well-being [70]. The current research provides an initial picture of the sociodemographic factors associated with the number of cigarettes smoked and intentions to quit in adults in rural Bangladesh. The findings suggest that occupations requiring manual work and people with a lower level of education have low awareness of the harmful effects of smoking. The research demonstrates a need for appropriate interventions for improving motivation to quit smoking and SLT use.
In the ITC, participants who intended to quit smoking within one year were younger and with or without any chronic diseases. There are several reasons our study found a lower percentage of people with intentions to quit smoking. In this rural Bangladesh community, there is a lack of public health campaigns focusing on the benefits and harms of quitting smoking, smoking cessation programs (e.g., a quit line or clinic), and available smoking cessation medications. The low rate of quitting intention among Bangladeshi adults may be associated with the lack of policy initiatives that could encourage smokers to think about quitting. In Vietnam, tobacco control interventions, such as stipulating places where smoking is not allowed, applying health warnings in text and pictures on cigarette packs, and completely banning tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship, significantly increased the intention to quit smoking [58].
In our study, the proportion intending to quit smoking did not differ significantly across age groups or other socio-demographic factors. However, it was lower among younger age groups, which is consistent with previous studies in Bangladesh [49] and elsewhere [24,58,65] but opposite to the results of other studies [24,71]. Since age is a crucial predictor for starting to smoke or willingness to quit smoking, tobacco control strategies could include intense efforts to disseminate knowledge of the harmful effects of smoking among school and college students to stop them from ever smoking. Another strategy would be to introduce targeted tobacco cessation interventions to increase cessation rates among those who already smoke. A previous study [58] reported that if people are exposed to media channels, obtain information about the harmful effects of smoking, or are encouraged to quit smoking, they are more likely to intend to quit. In our study, the association between a younger age and a lower intention to quit smoking may be partially explained by the fact that no targeted tobacco cessation intervention programs are being conducted in the area [72]. A lower percentage of smoking cessation in younger people may also be because they perceive themselves as less vulnerable to smoking harms or are not concerned about smoking harms [73]. Overall, our study participants were older than in previous studies [24,49,58] and have hypertension, so the lower percentage with no intention to quit smoking is alarming.
The association of having a higher education with quitting smoking and SLT use in our study is in line with previous studies [25,58,67]. A previous study reported [25] that professional people quit smoking almost eight times more often than people with manual labor occupations. In our research, most of the farmers were smokers, and the proportion of them intending to quit smoking was significantly lower than the proportions among other professions. This association may be confounded by the fact that farmers, especially in most Asian countries, are less educated than those working in other professions [74]. Due to their low level of education, it is possible that they are less exposed to media or any health promotion programs for smoking cessation. This highlights the need for mass media anti-smoking messages and to conduct motivational programs for quitting smoking and SLT use, targeting those with low education levels in a community [60]. One-time education programs or focus group discussions, especially among people with low levels of education, can also help in the cessation of smoking tobacco and SLT use [38].
The number of cigarettes smoked has been reported to be associated with quitting smoking, and age has been shown to be a predictive factor of the number of cigarettes smoked [75]. In our study, none of the socio-demographic characteristics were found to be associated with the number of cigarettes smoked. However, in general, middle-aged people were found to smoke more than younger and older people. Among the younger people, the range of the number of cigarettes they smoked encompassed both the lowest and highest numbers. The fewest cigarettes were smoked by people with an SSC-level education or above. Our results contradict previous findings, where being older was associated with smoking a larger number of cigarettes per day [75].
Across Bangladesh, the prevalence of smoking varies from 23% to 60%, and the current study reports that 40% of adults were smokers and smoked about ten cigarettes per day and five packets of cigarettes per week [3,39,43]. Although the prevalence of current smokers in Bangladesh is high [3,39,43], the number of cigarettes smoked is reasonably low. For example, in Australia, the prevalence of current smokers in people aged 44–53 years is 13.6%, with a steady increase in the number quitting smoking. However, the current smokers in that age group smoke more than 20 cigarettes per day [75]. In the USA, the prevalence of smokers is 23%, of whom more than 50% smoke more than ten cigarettes, and 2% smoke more than 40 cigarettes per day [76]. One of the standard methods of quitting smoking is gradually reducing the number of cigarettes smoked per day before stopping completely [58,77,78]. This approach might be effective in Bangladesh, as the smokers are starting with a lower number of cigarettes per day, so they may be able to wean off quickly.
Our study has several strengths, including the in-person data collection. We also applied Rasch analysis to compute combined scores to report the overall intentions of quitting smoking, which gives a broader measure of the intention to quit than any specific item-related intention. However, the major limitation of this study is that the number of smokers and SLT users was small, which limited our ability to draw any significant conclusions. Because the data were collected through face-to-face interviews during the COVID-19 lockdown, the level of interaction between the participants and the data collectors may have been impacted. There may have been response bias due to the variation in education and skills and gender differences, but the data collectors were well-trained to minimize this. Future intervention studies to address the intention to quit smoking, SLT use, and actual outcomes are warranted. This study was conducted in a single district, limiting the generalizability to the national level. However, the rural population in terms of its socio-demographic and education levels is similar to that of Bangladesh [79].

5. Conclusions

The study aimed mainly to investigate the factors associated with the number of cigarettes smoked per day, awareness of the detrimental effects of smoking on health, and intention to quit tobacco use. Generally, people were aware of the detrimental effect of smoking. More than 90% of people knew that smoking was associated with cancer, and more than two-thirds of the participants felt unhappy about being a smoker or an SLT user. Younger people and farmers had less intention to quit smoking than their counterparts. A combined score of all the intention items produced using Rasch analysis found that half of the people had the intention to quit smoking tobacco and less than two-thirds intended to quit SLT use, while having a higher education was positively associated with these outcomes. Public health campaigns and health education programs should be implemented to increase the motivation to quit smoking, especially among farmers and people with a lower level of education. Since the study was conducted in a small area in Bangladesh, a large and nationally representative sample is needed to substantiate the conclusions.

Author Contributions

F.M.A.I. designed the study, analyzed the data, and drafted the manuscript. J.W. critically edited the manuscript. All authors critically reviewed and contributed to the development of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The School of Health Science of the Swinburne University of Technology provided funds for data collection for this research project. The university did not have any role in the data collection, analysis, writing of the manuscript, or publication.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The Swinburne University of Technology Human Research Ethics Committee (Review reference: 20202723-5020) approved the study. All data collection methods, data management, and analyses were performed in accordance with the relevant guidelines and regulations of the institution. The investigators provided written information about the project to the participants. The participants were given the option to discuss the project with the local investigators. The local investigators verbally discussed the project with those who were unable to read or illiterate before collecting their informed consent. All participants were above 18 years of age. The participants were informed that they had full rights to withdraw from the study at any stage if they wished. They were also informed that their decision to participate or not would not influence their relationship with ORCD. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The corresponding author will make the data used for this study available upon reasonable request.

Acknowledgments

We thank Gavin Lambert and Elisabeth Lambert for their suggestions in developing the manuscript. Rafiqul Islam, Helal Biswas, Sajibul Islam, Mofiz Biswas, and Abidul Islam are acknowledged for their hard work in contacting participants and door-to-door data collection. Thanks to Arzan Hosen for his help in the literature review. Finally, the authors thank the study participants for their voluntary participation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ORCD: Organization for Rural Community Development; SLT: smokeless tobacco; SES: socioeconomic status; RCT: randomized control trial; SSC: secondary school certificate; CI: confidence interval; OR: odds ratio.

References

  1. WHO. Tobacco: Fact Sheet. 2021. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/tobacco (accessed on 26 September 2021).
  2. Global Burden of Disease; Institute of Health Metrics, IHME: Washington, DC, USA, 2019.
  3. Sreeramareddy, C.T.; Pradhan, P.M.; Mir, I.A.; Sin, S. Smoking and smokeless tobacco use in nine South and Southeast Asian countries: Prevalence estimates and social determinants from Demographic and Health Surveys. Popul. Health Metr. 2014, 12, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Hackshaw, A.; Morris, J.K.; Boniface, S.; Tang, J.L.; Milenkovic, D. Low cigarette consumption and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: Meta-analysis of 141 cohort studies in 55 study reports. BMJ 2018, 360, j5855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Walser, T.; Cui, X.; Yanagawa, J.; Lee, J.M.; Heinrich, E.; Lee, G.; Sharma, S.; Dubinett, S.M. Smoking and lung cancer: The role of inflammation. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2008, 5, 811–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Youlden, D.R.; Cramb, S.M.; Baade, P.D. The International Epidemiology of Lung Cancer: Geographical distribution and secular trends. J. Thorac. Oncol. 2008, 3, 819–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Lee, P.N. Summary of the epidemiological evidence relating snus to health. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2011, 59, 197–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Siddiqi, K.; Shah, S.; Abbas, S.M.; Vidyasagaran, A.; Jawad, M.; Dogar, O.; Sheikh, A. Global burden of disease due to smokeless tobacco consumption in adults: Analysis of data from 113 countries. BMC Med. 2015, 13, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Gupta, B.K.; Kaushik, A.; Panwar, R.B.; Chaddha, V.S.; Nayak, K.C.; Singh, V.B.; Gupta, R.; Raja, S. Cardiovascular risk factors in tobacco-chewers: A controlled study. J. Assoc. Physicians India 2007, 55, 27–31. [Google Scholar]
  10. Huque, R.; Zaman, M.M.; Huq, S.M.; Sinha, D.N. Smokeless tobacco and public health in Bangladesh. Indian J. Public Health 2017, 61, S18–S24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rahman, M.A.; Zaman, M.M. Smoking and smokeless tobacco consumption: Possible risk factors for coronary heart disease among young patients attending a tertiary care cardiac hospital in Bangladesh. Public Health 2008, 122, 1331–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Piano, M.R.; Benowitz, N.L.; Fitzgerald, G.A.; Corbridge, S.; Heath, J.; Hahn, E.; Pechacek, T.F.; Howard, G.; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Impact of smokeless tobacco products on cardiovascular disease: Implications for policy, prevention, and treatment: A policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010, 122, 1520–1544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Health Risks of Smoking Tobacco. American Cancer Society. 2021. Available online: https://www.cancer.org/healthy/stay-away-from-tobacco/health-risks-of-tobacco/health-risks-of-smoking-tobacco.html (accessed on 26 September 2021).
  14. World Health Organization. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic 2019: Offer Help to Quit Tobacco Use; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  15. Abdullah, A.S.; Husten, C.G. Promotion of smoking cessation in developing countries: A framework for urgent public health interventions. Thorax 2004, 59, 623–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hagger, M.S.; Cheung, M.W.; Ajzen, I.; Hamilton, K. Perceived behavioral control moderating effects in the theory of planned behavior: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2022, 41, 155–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Docherty, G.; McNeill, A. The hardening hypothesis: Does it matter? Tob. Control 2012, 21, 267–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US). 2014. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK294308/ (accessed on 27 September 2021).
  19. Benowitz, N.L. Nicotine addiction. N. Engl. J. Med. 2010, 362, 2295–2303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Curry, S.J.; Grothaus, L.; McBride, C. Reasons for quitting: Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation for smoking cessation in a population-based sample of smokers. Addict. Behav. 1997, 22, 727–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hyland, A.; Li, Q.; Bauer, J.E.; Giovino, G.A.; Steger, C.; Cummings, K.M. Predictors of cessation in a cohort of current and former smokers followed over 13 years. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2004, 6 (Suppl. S3), S363–S369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Siahpush, M.; McNeill, A.; Hammond, D.; Fong, G.T. Socioeconomic and country variations in knowledge of health risks of tobacco smoking and toxic constituents of smoke: Results from the 2002 International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob. Control 2006, 15 (Suppl. 3), iii65–iii70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, G.B.; Pham, D.B.; Phan, H.T.; Le, M.D.; Hoang, M.V. Attempt to Quit Tobacco Smoking among Male Smokers in Vietnam and Predictive Factors: Findings from Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS). Asian Pac. J. Cancer Prev. 2021, 22, 2061–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Kar, S.S.; Sivanantham, P.; Rehman, T.; Chinnakali, P.; Thiagarajan, S. Willingness to quit tobacco and its correlates among Indian tobacco users-Findings from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey India, 2016–2017. J. Postgrad. Med. 2020, 66, 141–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Aryanpur, M.; Masjedi, M.R.; Mortaz, E.; Hosseini, M.; Jamaati, H.; Tabarsi, P.; Soori, H.; Heydari, G.R.; Kazempour-Dizaji, M.; Emami, H.; et al. Intention to Quit Smoking and Associated Factors in Smokers Newly Diagnosed with Pulmonary Tuberculosis. Tanaffos 2016, 15, 17–24. [Google Scholar]
  26. Vangeli, E.; Stapleton, J.; Smit, E.S.; Borland, R.; West, R. Predictors of attempts to stop smoking and their success in adult general population samples: A systematic review. Addiction 2011, 106, 2110–2121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hukkelberg, S.S.; Hagtvet, K.A.; Kovac, V.B. Latent interaction effects in the theory of planned behaviour applied to quitting smoking. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2014, 19, 83–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rise, J.; Kovac, V.; Kraft, P.; Moan, I.S. Predicting the intention to quit smoking and quitting behaviour: Extending the theory of planned behaviour. Br. J. Health Psychol. 2008, 13 Pt 2, 291–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lindson, N.; Thompson, T.P.; Ferrey, A.; Lambert, J.D.; Aveyard, P. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019, 7, CD006936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Jerzynski, T.; Stimson, G.V.; Shapiro, H.; Krol, G. Estimation of the global number of e-cigarette users in 2020. Harm. Reduct. J. 2021, 18, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. McNeill, A.B.L.; Calder, R.; Simonavicius, E.; Robson, D. Vaping in England: Evidence Update February 2021: A Report Commissioned by Public Health England; Public Health England: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  32. Hartwell, G.; Thomas, S.; Egan, M.; Gilmore, A.; Petticrew, M. E-cigarettes and equity: A systematic review of differences in awareness and use between sociodemographic groups. Tob. Control 2017, 26, e85–e91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jha, P.; Peto, R.; Zatonski, W.; Boreham, J.; Jarvis, M.J.; Lopez, A.D. Social inequalities in male mortality, and in male mortality from smoking: Indirect estimation from national death rates in England and Wales, Poland, and North America. Lancet 2006, 368, 367–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Abdullah, A.S.; Driezen, P.; Ruthbah, U.H.; Nargis, N.; Quah, A.C.; Fong, G.T. Patterns and predictors of smokeless tobacco use among adults in Bangladesh: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Bangladesh survey. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e101934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Palipudi, K.; Rizwan, S.; Sinha, D.; Andes, L.; Amarchand, R.; Krishnan, A.; Asma, S. Prevalence and sociodemographic determinants of tobacco use in four countries of the World Health Organization: South-East Asia region: Findings from the Global Adult Tobacco Survey. Indian J. Cancer 2014, 51, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Croucher, R.; Haque, M.F.; Kassim, S. Oral pain before and after smokeless tobacco cessation in U.K.-resident Bangladeshi women: Cross-sectional analyses. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2013, 15, 896–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Thankappan, K.R. Tobacco cessation in India: A priority health intervention. Indian J. Med. Res. 2014, 139, 484–486. [Google Scholar]
  38. Hale, J.W.; Lewis, C.; Nazir, N.; Daley, S.M.; Goeckner, R.; Gunville, J.; Faseru, B.; Greiner, K.A.; Choi, W.S.; Daley, C.M. One-Time Education Sessions to Help American Indian Smokeless Tobacco Users Quit. J. Community Health 2020, 45, 526–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. WHO. Global Adult Tobacco Survey; Bangladesh Report; World Health Organisation: Geneva, Switzerland, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  40. WHO. Impact of Tobacco-Related Illnesses in Bangladesh; World Health Organization Regional Office for South-East Asia: New Delhi, India, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  41. Alam, D.S.; Jha, P.; Ramasundarahettige, C.; Streatfield, P.K.; Niessen, L.W.; Chowdhury, M.A.; Siddiquee, A.T.; Ahmed, S.; Evans, T.G. Smoking-attributable mortality in Bangladesh: Proportional mortality study. Bull. World Health Organ. 2013, 91, 757–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Fatema, K.; Zwar, N.A.; Milton, A.H.; Ali, L.; Rahman, B. Prevalence of Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Diseases in Bangladesh: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0160180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Islam, F.M.A.; Walton, A. Tobacco Smoking and Use of Smokeless Tobacco and Their Association with Psychological Distress and Other Factors in a Rural District in Bangladesh: A Cross-Sectional Study. J. Environ. Public Health 2019, 2019, 1424592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. WHO. Non-Communicable Disease Risk Factor Survey, Bangladesh 2010; World Health Organisation: Dhaka, Bangladesh, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  45. Nargis, N.; Thompson, M.E.; Fong, G.T.; Driezen, P.; Hussain, A.K.; Ruthbah, U.H.; Quah, A.C.; Abdullah, A.S. Prevalence and Patterns of Tobacco Use in Bangladesh from 2009 to 2012: Evidence from International Tobacco Control (ITC) Study. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0141135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Collaborators, G.B.D.T. Smoking prevalence and attributable disease burden in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2015: A systematic analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2017, 389, 1885–1906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Esson, K.M.; Leeder, S.R. The Millennium Development Goals and Tobacco Control: An Opportunity for Global Partnership; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  48. Flora, M.S.; Kabir, I.; Moni, M.A. Quitting attempts in Bangladeshi male rural smokers and social correlates. Bangladesh Med. Res. Counc. Bull. 2017, 42, 53–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Driezen, P.; Abdullah, A.S.; Quah, A.C.K.; Nargis, N.; Fong, G.T. Determinants of intentions to quit smoking among adult smokers in Bangladesh: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Bangladesh wave 2 survey. Glob. Health Res. Policy 2016, 1, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kaleta, D.; Korytkowski, P.; Makowiec-Dabrowska, T.; Usidame, B.; Bak-Romaniszyn, L.; Fronczak, A. Predictors of long-term smoking cessation: Results from the global adult tobacco survey in Poland (2009–2010). BMC Public Health 2012, 12, 1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hakim, S.; Chowdhury, M.A.B.; Uddin, M.J. Correlates of attempting to quit smoking among adults in Bangladesh. Addict. Behav. Rep. 2018, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Ahmed, N.; Mozumder, T.A.; Hassan, M.T.; Huque, R. Demand for tobacco products in Bangladesh. Tob. Control 2022, 31, 737–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. RUMM. For Analysing Assessment and Attitude Questionnaire Data. 2010. Available online: http://www.rummlab.com.au/ (accessed on 27 September 2021).
  54. Islam, F.M.A.; Lambert, E.A.; Islam, S.M.S.; Islam, M.A.; Biswas, D.; McDonald, R.; Maddison, R.; Thompson, B.; Lambert, G.W. Lowering blood pressure by changing lifestyle through a motivational education program: A cluster randomized controlled trial study protocol. Trials 2021, 22, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics. Population and Housing Census. National Volume-2. Union Statistics. Statistics and Information Division, Ministry of Planning. Bangladesh. 2011. Available online: http://www.bbs.gov.bd/site/page/47856ad0-7e1c-4aab-bd78-892733bc06eb/ (accessed on 1 December 2022).
  56. Chakrabarti, R.; Finger, R.P.; Lamoureux, E.; Islam, M.T.; Dirani, M.; Bhuiyan, M.A.; Islam, S.Z.; Wahab, M.A.; Islam, F.M.A. Rationale and methodology for a population-based study of diabetes and common eye diseases in a rural area in Bangladesh: Bangladesh Population-based Diabetes and Eye Study (BPDES). Bangladesh J. Med. Sci. 2015, 14, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Whelton, P.K.; Carey, R.M.; Aronow, W.S.; Casey, D.E., Jr.; Collins, K.J.; Dennison Himmelfarb, C.; DePalma, S.M.; Gidding, S.; Jamerson, K.A.; Jones, D.W.; et al. 2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Management of High Blood Pressure in Adults: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2018, 71, e127–e248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Hoang, L.T.; Tuyet Hanh, T.T.; Khue, L.N.; Hai, P.T.; Can, P.V.; Long, K.Q.; Linh, N.T.; Anh, D.T.; Van Minh, H. Intention to Quit and Predictive Factors among Current Smokers in Vietnam: Findings from Adult Tobacco Survey 2020. Tob. Use Insights 2022, 15, 1179173X221098460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Aubin, H.; Lagrue, G.; Legeron, P.; Pelissolo, G.A. Smoking cessation motivation questionnaire (Q-MAT): Construction and validation. Alcool. Addictol. 2004, 27, 19–25. [Google Scholar]
  60. Cheng, Y.H.; Chi, I.; Boey, K.W.; Ko, L.S.; Chou, K.L. Self-rated economic condition and the health of elderly persons in Hong Kong. Soc. Sci. Med. 2002, 55, 1415–1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wright, B.; Masters, G. Rating Scale Analysis: Rasch Measurement; MESA Press: Chicago, IL, USA, 1982. [Google Scholar]
  62. Our World Data. 2022. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/ (accessed on 15 December 2022).
  63. Abdullah, A.S.; Ho, L.M.; Kwan, Y.H.; Cheung, W.L.; McGhee, S.M.; Chan, W.H. Promoting smoking cessation among the elderly: What are the predictors of intention to quit and successful quitting? J. Aging Health 2006, 18, 552–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Reddy, M.M.; Kanungo, S.; Naik, B.N.; Kar, S.S. Willingness to quit tobacco smoking and its correlates among Indian smokers-Findings from Global Adult Tobacco Survey India, 2009–2010. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2018, 7, 1353–1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Smiley, S.L. Sociodemographic correlates of intention to quit smoking for good among U.S. adult menthol and non-menthol smokers: Evidence from the 2013–2014 National Adult Tobacco Survey. Tob. Prev. Cessat. 2018, 4, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Girvalaki, C.; Filippidis, F.T.; Kyriakos, C.N.; Driezen, P.; Herbec, A.; Mons, U.; Papadakis, S.; Mechili, E.A.; Katsaounou, P.A.; Przewozniak, K.; et al. Perceptions, Predictors of and Motivation for Quitting among Smokers from Six European Countries from 2016 to 2018: Findings from EUREST-PLUS ITC Europe Surveys. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Abdullah, A.S.; Yam, H.K. Intention to quit smoking, attempts to quit, and successful quitting among Hong Kong Chinese smokers: Population prevalence and predictors. Am. J. Health Promot. 2005, 19, 346–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Myung, S.K.; McDonnell, D.D.; Kazinets, G.; Seo, H.G.; Moskowitz, J.M. Relationships between household smoking restrictions and intention to quit smoking among Korean American male smokers in California. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2010, 25, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hyland, A.; Laux, F.L.; Higbee, C.; Hastings, G.; Ross, H.; Chaloupka, F.J.; Fong, G.T.; Cummings, K.M. Cigarette purchase patterns in four countries and the relationship with cessation: Findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Tob. Control 2006, 15 (Suppl. 3), iii59–iii64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Health Benefits of Quitting Smoking over Time; American Cancer Society: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2023.
  71. Wang, Q.; Mati, K. Intention to Quit among Smokers in Kazakhstan: Data from 2014 Global Adult Tobacco Survey. J. Epidemiol. Glob. Health 2019, 9, 23–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wartella, E.; Rideout, V.; Montague, H.; Beaudoin-Ryan, L.; Lauricella, A. Teens, health, and technology: A national survey. Media Commun. 2016, 4, 13–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yong, H.H.; Borland, R.; Siahpush, M. Quitting-related beliefs, intentions, and motivations of older smokers in four countries: Findings from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey. Addict. Behav. 2005, 30, 777–788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Ali, M.; Kabir, M.M.M.; Haque, S.S.; Qin, X.; Nasrin, S.; Landisc, D.; Holmquist, B.; Ahmed, N. Farmer’s behavior in pesticide use: Insights study from smallholder and intensive agricultural farms in Bangladesh. Sci. Total Environ. 2020, 747, 141160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Smoking: Key Statistics and Information about Smoking and Its Prevalence within Australia; Australian Bureau of Statistics: Canberra, Australia, 2021.
  76. Number of Cigarettes Smoked on an Average Day in the U.S. 2020; Statistics Research Department, USA. 2022. Available online: https://www.statista.com/statistics/275993/us-households-number-of-cigarettes-smoked-on-an-average-day/ (accessed on 16 December 2022).
  77. Cheong, Y.; Yong, H.H.; Borland, R. Does how you quit affect success? A comparison between abrupt and gradual methods using data from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Study. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2007, 9, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Garnett, C.; Brown, J.; Shahab, L.; Raupach, T.; Lindson, N. Potential Explanations for Conflicting Findings on Abrupt Versus Gradual Smoking Cessation: A Population Study in England. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2022, 24, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Bangladesh: Standard Demographic and Health Survey. 2011. Available online: https://dhsprogram.com/methodology/survey/survey-display-349.cfm (accessed on 1 December 2022).
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants.
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics of the study participants.
Number Percentage
SexFemale15450.2
Male15349.8
Age group, yearsBelow 40 4615.0
40–5916052.1
60 years or older10132.9
Level of educationNo education9932.2
Primary to high school14948.5
Secondary school certificate or above 5919.1
Socioeconomic status Poor or very poor 9230.0
Middle class or rich 21570.0
Occupation Homemakers14647.6
Businesspersons 247.8
Employees 5317.3
Farmer (agriculture or any hard labor)7223.5
Unemployed 123.9
Table 2. Smoking and SLT use in people with high blood pressure and their associated socio-demographic factors.
Table 2. Smoking and SLT use in people with high blood pressure and their associated socio-demographic factors.
Smoke TobaccoSmokeless Tobacco (SLT)
No. at Riskn (%)OR (95% CI) *No. at Riskn (%)OR (95% CI) *
SexFemale1540 (0)--15456 (36.4)2.74 (1.48, 5.09)
Male15362 (40.5)--15331 (20.3)1.0
Age, yearsBelow 40205 (25.0)1.0466 (13.0)1.0
40–596334 (54.0)5.09 (1.0, 26.5)16043 (26.9)1.71 (0.63, 4.61)
60 or above7023 (32.9)2.01 (0.38, 10.7)10138 (37.6)3.78 (1.26, 11.4)
+Level of education No education3920 (51.3)3.76 (1.27, 11.1)9939 (39.4)2.5 (0.92, 6.82)
Primary to high school6530 (46.2)2.73 (1.06, 7.06)14941 (27.5)1.89 (0.74, 4.82)
SSC or above4912 (24.5)1.0597 (11.9)1.0
SESPoor4018 (45.0)1.09230 (32.6)1.0
Middle class11344 (38.9)1.13 (0.49, 2.57)21557 (26.5)0.92 (0.52, 1.62)
Occupation Homemaker00014651 (34.9)1.27 (0.19, 8.74)
Businessperson 249 (37.5)0.75 (0.24, 2.36)244 (16.7)2.00 (0.52, 7.78)
Employee4513 (28.9)0.79 (0.29, 2.17)5316 (31.5)2.34 (0.77, 7.16)
Farmer (agriculture or any hard labor)7238 (52.8)1.0 (ref)7214 (18.7)1.0 (ref)
Unemployed122 (16.7)0.26 (0.05, 1.39)12 4 (33.3)1.29 (0.11, 11.73)
* Odds ratio; 95% confidence interval (CI) adjusted for variables in the model. In the case of smoking tobacco, the associations are shown for male participants only.
Table 3. Numbers of cigarettes and weekly numbers of packets smoked, and their associated factors.
Table 3. Numbers of cigarettes and weekly numbers of packets smoked, and their associated factors.
No. of Cigarettes Smoked per Day Packets of Cigarettes Smoked per Week
Characteristics Mean (95% CI) *pMean (95% CI) *p
Total, n = 629.6 (5.8, 13.4) 5.3 (4.0, 6.6)
Age, years Below 40, n = 59.4 (0.1, 19.2)0.507.3 (4.1, 10.6)0.12
40–59, n = 3410.9 (7.8, 13.9) 4.7 (3.6, 5.7)
60 years or older, n = 238.6 (5.3, 12.0) 3.9 (2.8, 5.0)
Level of education No education, n = 20 11.0 (6.5, 15.5)0.285.1 (3.6, 6.6)0.88
Primary to high school, n = 3011.1 (7.3, 14.9) 5.4 (4.2, 6.7)
SSC or above, n = 126.8 (1.0, 12.7) 5.4 (3.4, 7.4)
+SESPoor, n = 189.5 (5.3, 14.2)0.885.3 (3.7, 7.0)0.91
Middle class or rich, n = 449.1 (6.2, 11.9) 5.3 (4.1, 6.4)
+Occupation Homemaker, n = 0-- --
Businessperson, n = 98.8 (6.2, 11.3)0.895.0 (3.2, 6.9)0.35
Employee, n = 1310.7 (6.4, 15.0) 5.7 (4.1, 7.4)
Farmer (Agriculture or any hard labor), n = 3811.3 (9.1, 13.5) 5.2 (3.7, 6.7)
Unemployed, n = 2 7.0 (1.0, 18.1) 1.75 (0, 5.5)
* Mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) adjusted for variables in the model.
Table 4. Knowledge of smoking-related diseases among 62 adults who smoked tobacco.
Table 4. Knowledge of smoking-related diseases among 62 adults who smoked tobacco.
Diseases Number (n)Percentage (n/62)
Cancer 5487
Heart Attack 2337
Tuberculosis 1016
Asthma1016
Stroke 813
Do not know 813
Table 5. Intention to quit smoking of 62 tobacco smokers and 87 SLT users (participants with high blood pressure).
Table 5. Intention to quit smoking of 62 tobacco smokers and 87 SLT users (participants with high blood pressure).
Intentions about Quitting Smoking Items Tobacco Smoker, n = 62SLT User,
n = 87
n%n%
Thinking about quitting smokingNot at all0055.7
A little1625.83034.5
A lot4369.45158.6
Enormously34.811.1
Feel unhappyNever711.32427.6
Sometime3861.33135.6
Often1727.43236.8
Six-month planSmoking as much34.8910.3
Cut down a little4064.54855.2
Cut down a lot1524.22124.1
Stop smoking46.5910.3
Stopping smoking will increase self-imageNot at all58.122.3
A little2337.13944.8
A lot3251.64450.6
Enormously23.222.3
Stop smoking at the moment Not at all812.989.2
A little 3556.54754.0
A lot1829.03135.6
Enormously11.611.1
Next four weeks smoking cessation planSmoking as much46.578.0
Cut down a little3962.95967.8
Cut down a lot1219.4910.3
Stop smoking711.31213.8
Tried to stop smokingNever1727.43540.2
Once1524.22933.3
Several times3048.42326.4
Table 6. Intention and attitudes about quitting smoking and SLT use in people who are tobacco smokers (n = 62) and SLT users (n = 87).
Table 6. Intention and attitudes about quitting smoking and SLT use in people who are tobacco smokers (n = 62) and SLT users (n = 87).
Smoking: Combined Score (%)SLT Use: Combined Score (%)
CharacteristicsNo. at Risk Percentage (95% CI) *pNo. at RiskPercentage (95% CI) *p
Total 6250.4 (39.9, 60.9) 8764.0 (55.3, 72.7)
Age, years
Below 40536.3 (9.3, 63.4)0.11667.4 (49.3, 85.6)0.49
40–593453.2 (44.7, 61.8) 4359.7 (49.8, 69.6)
60 years or older2361.6 (52.4, 70.9) 3864.9 (55.9, 73.9)
Level of education
No education2044.8 (32.3, 57.3)0.133953.2 (42.6, 63.7)0.02
Primary to high school3056.1 (45.5, 66.6) 4063.8 (54.3, 73.3)
SSC or above1250.3 (34.1, 66.6) 875.0 (57.4, 92.6)
+SES
Poor1850.6 (36.9, 64.2)0.343061.6 (50.8, 72.4)0.35
Middle class4454.4 (49.3, 59.5) 5766.4 (57.3, 75.5)
+Occupation
Homemaker 0--0.015155.7 (46.8, 64.6)0.28
Businessperson 950.7 (35.6, 65.9) 672.9 (52.3, 93.6)
Employee1358.9 (45.1, 72.6) 1662.1 (49.3, 74.9)
Farmer (Agriculture or any hard work),3841.6 (29.4, 53.9) 1265.3 (50.4, 80.2)
Unemployed 256.4 (49.5, 63.2) 251.4 (31.5, 69.5)
* Mean (95% confidence interval (CI)) adjusted for variables in the model.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Islam, F.M.A.; Williams, J. Factors Associated with Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco Use, Intention to Quit, and the Number of Cigarettes Smoked among Adults with High Blood Pressure in a Rural District of Bangladesh. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 5355. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095355

AMA Style

Islam FMA, Williams J. Factors Associated with Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco Use, Intention to Quit, and the Number of Cigarettes Smoked among Adults with High Blood Pressure in a Rural District of Bangladesh. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(9):5355. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095355

Chicago/Turabian Style

Islam, Fakir M. Amirul, and Joanne Williams. 2023. "Factors Associated with Smoking and Smokeless Tobacco Use, Intention to Quit, and the Number of Cigarettes Smoked among Adults with High Blood Pressure in a Rural District of Bangladesh" Applied Sciences 13, no. 9: 5355. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095355

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop