Next Article in Journal
Hot Rolling of ZK60 Magnesium Alloy with Isotropic Tensile Properties from Tubing Made by Shear Assisted Processing and Extrusion (ShAPE)
Previous Article in Journal
Integrated Path Tracking Controller of Underground Articulated Vehicle Based on Nonlinear Model Predictive Control
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Re-Thinking Table Salt Reduction in Bread with Halophyte Plant Solutions

by
Maria João Barroca
1,2,
Catarina Flores
1,
Sandrine Ressurreição
1,
Raquel Guiné
3,
Nádia Osório
2,4 and
Aida Moreira da Silva
1,2,*
1
Polytechnic of Coimbra, Agriculture School of Coimbra, Bencanta, 3040-360 Coimbra, Portugal
2
Molecular Physical-Chemistry R&D Unit, Department of Chemistry, University of Coimbra, 3004-535 Coimbra, Portugal
3
CERNAS Research Centre, Department of Food Industry, Polytechnic of Viseu, 3504-510 Viseu, Portugal
4
Polytechnic of Coimbra, Coimbra Health School, Rua 5 de Outubro—SM Bispo, Apartado 7006, 3046-854 Coimbra, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(9), 5342; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095342
Submission received: 28 March 2023 / Revised: 20 April 2023 / Accepted: 21 April 2023 / Published: 25 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Applied Biosciences and Bioengineering)

Abstract

:
Sodium intake higher than it is physiologically necessary has been associated with some non-communicable diseases such as hypertension, cardiovascular disease, and stroke. Bread is commonly consumed and is a major source of sodium in the human diet. Among the interventions to reduce the salt content in bread, the incorporation of salty taste halophyte powder could be a promising strategy. In the present work, Sarcocornia perennis was incorporated as a food ingredient to substitute the salt (sodium) of white wheat bread (1.2% NaCl/0.47% sodium, flour basis). Powdered dried S. perennis was incorporated into bread by replacing the same amount of sodium (0.47%, flour basis) and half of the sodium concentration (0.235%, flour basis), respectively, B100 and B50 bread samples. The bread samples were analyzed to evaluate the impact of the sodium chloride replacement by S. perennis powder on total baking loss, specific volume, crumb color, textural properties, microbial activity, nutritional and mineral composition and sensory evaluation. The incorporation of S. perennis increased the specific volume but had no relevant impact on the textural properties of bread. Furthermore, the substitution of sodium chloride by S. perennis powder allowed a more colored (greenish and yellowish) and dark crumb leading to a lower whiteness index. Compared with control bread, the addition of S. perennis powder promoted a significant increase of all bread’s nutrients and minerals, namely calcium, phosphor, iron, and manganese. Besides the improvement of bread quality, B100, and B50 bread samples were both sensorily well accepted and with similar scores to all the evaluated sensorial attributes. Moreover, the reduction of sodium to half (0.235% sodium (flour basis) in bread (B50) did not affect the acceptability of tasters, as compared with B100 (0.47% sodium (flour basis)). Both new bread formulation has microbiological quality as ready-to-eat product. However, taking into account greater stability over time for microbial spoilage, mainly caused by fungi and yeasts, B50 bread is more promising. The B50 bread sample is also a potential strategy to obtain a sodium reduction of 50% in bread, which could be essential to reduce the overall sodium daily intake and bring important economic and public health benefits.

1. Introduction

A global trend to improve the nutritional value of the human diet is to fortify traditional food products with functional ingredients using natural nutrients and antioxidants from plants [1]. Bread is one of the most popular staple foods in the daily human diet [2]. Its basic recipe consists in combining flour, water, yeast and salt. However, the generalized use of refined flour of wheat grains leads to a low nutritional quality of bread. Thus, to enhance the overall quality of bakery products through the increase of the nutritive value, attractiveness and sensory features are often added ingredients and additives such as dairy products, eggs, lecithin, inulin, spirulina, apple pomace, acerola fruit, hazelnut, walnuts, herbs, spices and various types of flour and seeds (chia, pumpkin, poppy, sunflower, flax, cumin, grapes, lentil) and others [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Furthermore, some of the ingredients, added in fresh or dried powders, are rich in compounds, namely vitamins, natural antioxidants, minerals and dietary fibers that have beneficial human health effects [13,14]. Despite these beneficial ingredients, bread and bakery products are one of the food products with the greatest contribution to dietary salt, beyond, cheeses, spreads and processed meat and fish products [15]. The salt addition strengthens the formed gluten and ensures adequate structure of bread but also enhances the palatability to satisfy consumer preferences but also increases the incidence of stroke, cardiovascular and coronary heart diseases that are associated with salt intake [16]. Thus, the salt reduction in bread could be a potentially effective strategy to reduce population salt intake to the recommended value of 5 g of salt per day allied to public health interventions in food labelling, consumer education, and the establishment of salt dietary guidelines [17,18].
One advisable strategy to enhance the nutritional value and antioxidant activity of white bread with a lower salt addition is the incorporation of salty taste halophyte plants. Halophyte plants have been a growing interest and importance in agriculture due to their productivity in soils with high salinity and low water intake environments and their high nutritional, mineral and bioactive profiles [19,20]. The possibility of cultivation under saline conditions could contribute to a sustainable agriculture, surpassing the problem of soil salinization and the scarcity of fresh water for agriculture.
The perennial succulent and edible Sarcocornia perennis is one of the most abundant salt marsh halophytes of European Atlantic coasts and the Mediterranean [21]. The plant is usually consumed in fresh or dried to produce “green salt” (dry powder) of high quality to be used as salt substitute [22]. The use of dried powdered halophyte plants such as Sarcocornia as a salt substitute is an innovative and promising strategy to reduce the ingestion of salt and to produce novel and functional food products such as beverages, microencapsulated oils, snacks and food additives [23,24]
S. perennis is rich in protein, fiber, fatty acids (mainly palmitic, linolenic and linoleic acid) and have a great content of minerals such as sodium (Na), potassium (K), calcium (Ca), Mg (magnesium) and iron (Fe) [19,23,25]. Moreover, the plant contains a high diversity of phenolic acids including trans-cinnamic, salicylic, coumaric, and caffeic acids and flavonoids such as luteolin and rutin and glycosylated flavonoids that confer important biological properties and health benefits related with cardiovascular system, among others [20,26,27]. In a recent study the S. perennis proved to be effective as a dietary substitute for regular salt in food making, providing positive effects on cardiovascular system (peripheral and central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity) in young and healthy adults [27]. However, the incorporation of halophyte dried powder in white bread or bakery products is very scarcely referred in the literature.
In line with the trend to enrich bakery products with functional ingredients, Clavel-Colibrié et al. [23] concluded that crackers with 5% of powder dried S. perennis led to a product sensory well accepted by consumers and with an improvement of its nutritional profile, namely in terms of phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity, and minerals.
To the best or our knowledge Lopes et al. [28] suggested, for the first time, that the halophyte Salicornia ramosissima had potential to be used as a salt substitute in bread and Toumi et al. [29] used this halophyte powder as a functional substitute of sodium chloride in the production of wheat bread. The results evidenced that using 1.8% salt with a substitution ratio of 65.24% is the best combination to obtain doughs with high stability and better viscoelastic, extensional and fermentation properties and breads with softer and less chewy crumbs but greener than those containing only sodium chloride (NaCl).
The present work aims to evaluate the potential of another halophyte powder, Sarcocornia perennis, as a nutrition relevant substitute of sodium chloride in bread. In this context, control bread (CB) has 1.2% NaCl/0.47% sodium (flour basis) and B100 and B50 samples have, respectively the same amount of sodium (0.47% (flour basis) and half of the sodium concentration 0.235% (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis. Halophyte was incorporated as a food ingredient to substitute the salt (sodium) of white wheat bread and the physical, nutritional, mineral, sensory properties and microbiological activity were evaluated and compared with control bread (CB).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Dried Sarcocornia and Other Ingredients

Dried Sarcocornia perennis powder (Figure 1) was provided by the Salina Greens company (Tejo estuary, Alcochete, Setúbal, Portugal) in February 2022.
Wheat flour T65 (protein 11%, lipids 1.6%; fiber 3.5%, salt: <0.1% and energy 343 kcal) from CERES (Portugal) sugar, dough conditioner (bread improver) and dry baker’s yeast were the ingredients used in a local bakery (Tertúlia dos Sabores, Coimbra) to produce bread.

2.2. Bread Preparation

Three bread samples were prepared according to the formulations described in Table 1. To determine the appropriate amount of water to add to the bread samples, preliminary experiments were conducted at the bakery. The level of incorporation of sodium chloride/sodium was based on flour weight. Control sample (CB) with 1.2% NaCl/0.47% sodium (flour basis) and two samples with the replacement of the initial salt (sodium) content by S. perennis powder: B50 (0.235% sodium, flour basis) and B100 (0.47% sodium, flour basis). To clarify, in B50 and B100 were not added sodium chloride (NaCl) and sodium concentration was, respectively, half and the same amount of sodium as the control sample (CB).
The dough was mixed by using an electric mixer (Ferneto, AEF050, Vagos, Portugal), at low-speed selection, for 6 min with the addition of the water. The velocity was increased, and the dough was kneaded for more 2 min to mix the remaining ingredients (Figure 2a). The dough rested for 5 min, was weighted, divided, rounded and molded in 30 samples of 82–84 g (Figure 2b) for each type of bread. The samples rested more 30 min at room temperature. Next, it was placed in the fridge for 16 h. Finally, the bread was cut into desired shape and baked in an industrial oven (Ramalhos MR.1128, Águeda, Portugal) with double heating (250 °C on top and 200 °C on bottom) during 8 min. The bread was cooled down at ambient temperature.
Physical analyses were performed 4 h after of baking and some of the bread batches were dried in a convective oven at 40 °C for 2 days, crushed to powder (using an electric mill) and stored in bags using vacuum to be used for biochemical composition.

2.3. Bread Physico-Chemical Analysis

2.3.1. Total Baking Loss

The total baking loss was determined as follows:
Total   baking   loss   % = W dough     W bread W dough × 100
Where Wdough is the weight of the dough for baking and Wbread is the weight of the bread after cooling.

2.3.2. Specific Volume

Specific bread volume was determined using the rapeseed displacement method (AACC 44–15.02). The specific volume was calculated as the ratio between volume (cm3) and bread weight (g).

2.3.3. Color Evaluation

The bread crumb color coordinates lightness (L*), redness/greenness (a*) and yellowness/blueness (b*) were measured using a colorimeter (Chroma Meter—CR-400, Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan), and were registered in the CIE Lab color space. Measurements were performed at three points using three slices from each loaf. Total color difference (TCD) was calculated as mentioned in Pires et al. [30] to quantify the overall color difference between control sample (reference) and breads with incorporation of S. perennis powder (B50 and B100). The whiteness index (WI) for crumb was determined as referred in Djordjević et.al. [31] and the chromaticity (C*) was determined as follows:
C * = ( a * ) 2 + ( b * ) 2

2.3.4. Texture Analysis

Bread crumb Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) was performed in a texturometer TA-XT.plus (Stable Micro Systems, Surrey, UK) equiped with a 5 kg load cell and a 25 mm diameter cylindrical probe. The bread textural properties were carried out 4 h after baking and using slices with a thickness of 20 mm. The bread samples were compressed twice to 50% of their original height at a constant speed of 1 mm/s and 5 s of waiting time. From the resulting force-time curves were analysed the following textural parameters: hardness, springiness, cohsiveness and resilience.

2.4. Microbiological Analysis

Bread samples were prepared by mashing and mixing in peptone water. Subsamples were diluted decimally, and 0.1 mL aliquots were spread plated on nutrient agar (NA), MacConkey agar (MCA), and potato dextrose agar (PDA) for the enumeration of aerobic viable bacteria, coliforms and fungi, respectively. The NA and MCA plates were incubated at 37 °C for 24–48 h while PDA plates were incubated at room temperature (°C) for 3 days. The colonies were then counted and expressed as colony forming units per gram (cfu/g) of samples. The evaluation was carried out on the 2nd and 4th day after cooking, during the storage time, bread samples were placed in a cloth bag (a) and in a paper bag (b) at room temperature.

2.5. Proximate Composition of S. perennis and Bread

The proximate composition of S. perennis powder and bread samples was analysed following the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC, 1997) methodologies [32]. Moisture content (method 930.04 and 930.22), ashes (method 930.05 and 930.22), total lipids (method 930.09 and 935.38), crude protein (method 978.04 and 950.37) using a nitrogen conversion factor of 6.25 to S. perennis and 5.7 to bread samples, crude fiber (method 930.10 and 950.37), total dietary fiber (985.29) and 991.42 method to insoluble dietary fiber, with a Total Dietary Fiber Assay Kit (Megaezyme, Ireland). Soluble dietary fiber was determined by the difference between total dietary fiber and insoluble dietary fiber. The carbohydrates’ content was determined from the difference between 100 and the sum of the percentages of moisture, ashes, total lipids, crude protein and dietary fiber contents. The Regulation (EU) No. 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011 was used for the calculation of the energy values (expressed in kcal/100 g and kJ/100 g) [33].
With the ashes, the mineral content was analyzed through dry mineralization (method 975.03). The ashes were wetted with 10 drops of distilled water and 3–4 mL of HNO3 (33% (v/v) and the HNO3 was evaporated on a hot plate set at 100–120 °C. The crucibles were returned to the muffle and incinerated for another 1 h at 500 °C. The ashes were dissolved in 10 mL of HCl (20% (v/v) on a hot plate set at 100–120 °C around 30 min and transferred and filtered to a 50 mL volumetric flask, added 10 mL of LaCl3 (5%), and the volume adjusted with distilled water. After dilutions with water (1:100 and 1:200) the analysis was carried out with flame atomic absorption spectrometry (FAAS) (PerkinElmer PinAAcle 900 T, Waltham, MA, USA) equipped with the cathode corresponding to each element (sodium, potassium, magnesium, manganese, calcium, copper, iron and zinc). The phosphorus content was determined by spectrophotometry (method 948.09) with a PG instrument T80 + UV/VIS spectrophotometer (UK).

2.6. Sensory Analysis

An untrained sensory analysis panel (n = 67, age: 17–64, gender: 44 female, 20 male, 3 without response) was recruited from Coimbra Agriculture School (ESAC) in order to evaluate possible changes in the organoleptic characteristics of bread with incorporation of S. perennis powder (B50 and B100), as well as the control sample (CB). To assess the preference for a given product the tasters used a Product Preference Test. Panelists were placed randomly at room temperature and water was served to clean their palates between samples. The bread samples were evaluated to attributes aspect, color, aroma, texture, flavor and global assessment using one hedonic scale with nine levels (1 (dislike extremely) to 9 (like extremely)).

2.7. Statistical Analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate, except for specific volume, which was performed in duplicate. To analyze possible differences between the properties evaluated in the bread samples, one way analysis of variance was used (ANOVA), complemented with Tukey post-hoc test, to compare between the different samples. The analyses were performed using SPSS version 28 (from IBM), and a level of significance of 5% was used in all statistical tests.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Proximate Composition of S. perennis

The nutritional and mineral composition of Sarcocornia perennis is presented in Table 2.
Like most vegetables, Sarcocornia species, namely S. perennis collected in Tejo estuary, are low in protein and lipids. However, Sarcocornia species collected in Southern Portugal have a slightly higher content of lipids (1.20–2.25%) and lower content of protein (6.9–8.10%) [19]. The different protein content can be associated with the stress response to natural stress conditions, such as temperature, salinity and UV radiation that contribute to protein synthesis [34]. In addition, S. perennis is rich in dietary fiber, from which 86% is the insoluble portion of dietary fibre, corresponding to compounds such as lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose. Similarly, the neutral detergent fiber (NDF) obtained to Sarcocornia species of Southern Portugal is in the range of 20.8–34.1% [19]. The high levels of insoluble dietary fibre and the low caloric content of this halophyte (158.03 ± 0.05 kcal/100 g dry weight) can promote important health benefits including a reduced risk of cardiovascular diseases and weight loss.
Generically, the ash levels (33.84 ± 0.03% dw) of this S. perennis collected in Tejo estuary (Alcochete, Portugal) are higher than those observed for S. perennis sampled in Southern Portugal (23.3%) [25], but lower than the same halophyte collected from salt pans in Figueira da Foz (43.62%) [22] which may be related with the mineral composition of the soils from which the halophytes were collected.
S. perennis is a valuable source of essential minerals, having the more relevant sodium and potassium and in a lower extension of magnesium, calcium and phosphor. Sodium is a vital mineral in maintaining electronic fluid balance, but its excessive consumption is associated with cardiovascular diseases and hypertension. However, the high levels of potassium, also essential to an adequate fluid balance, might contribute to reducing the harmful effects of sodium excess since improves the excretion of sodium from the body. Sodium, potassium and magnesium were also the macro-mineral prevalent in S. perennis species collected in Southern Portugal [25]. Iron, copper, zinc and manganese are essential micronutrients that play essential roles in chloroplast reactions, protein synthesis, and hormone growth, among others [35]. The levels of these minerals are like those found in edible Sarcocornia perennis plant collected in Southern Portugal [25]. Even though the concentrations of these micronutrients in halophyte powder are low, the intake of 10 g of S. perennis powder provides 8.2%, 10.9%, 3.0%, 14.8% of the daily value recommended values to iron, copper, zin and manganese, respectively [33].

3.2. Bread Characterization

3.2.1. Baking Loss and Specific Volume

The dough mass of each sample was manually divided and shaped into equal-sized pieces of dough (82–84 g) and after baking were obtained the breads of Figure 3.
The weight of control (CB), B50 and B100 bread samples was 71.2 g, 73.4 g, and 76.42 g, respectively (Table 3). The increase of the bread weight with the addition of S. perennis powder, particularly to B100 bread, can be related to the increase of fiber content in loaves of bread that typically enables the absorption of more water than the main components of flour. Similar behavior was observed to total baking loss that represents the water evaporation during baking. There were no significant differences between the bread samples CB and B50. However, the percentage of water loss during the baking of B100 sample was lower, which allows for a higher weight of this bread. The hygroscopic nature of S. perennis powder allowed a high retention of water during bread baking. Similar findings were found in common wheat bread with sodium chloride substitution with Salicornia ramosissima powder which is a halophyte species similar morphology with Sarcocornia spp. [29].
Regarding bread’s specific volume, it was possible to perceive that the values increased from control (3.24 cm3/g) to samples that incorporated S. perennis, having B100 the higher volume per weight unit (3.66 cm3/g). Toumi et al. [29] found a specific volume of 2.8 cm3/g for bread prepared with 1.8% NaCl.
The added salt hinders yeast activity, which results in lower carbon dioxide (CO2) production but, on the other hand, induces changes in molecular conformations and gluten structure that increase the ability to retain CO2. The final impact of sodium chloride on specific volume, which is one of the most important visual characteristics of bread depends on the proper balance of these two factors, coupled with the used equipment, type and quality of the ingredients, and the technique of dough preparation. Even this, comparing the specific volume of bread with 1.2% NaCl (this study) and 1.8% NaCl [29] it was observed that this parameter decreased with the increase in salt (NaCl) amount, as observed by Toumi et al. [29].
The incorporation of S. perennis powder in bread, instead of NaCl, developed higher well-aerated loaves. This tendency could be explained by the increase of fibre which forms a less tenacious gluten structure with a subsequent increase of air incorporation ability in loaves during baking. Similar findings were found for the specific volume of wheat flour doughs with the addition of S. ramosissima powder, where the breads prepared exclusively with Salicornia powder presented the highest specific volume values (about 3.2 cm3/g) at all levels of salt amount (0.6, 1.2 and 1.8%) [29].
Other prominent strategies used to reduce the salt content in bread are the salt replacers such as potassium chloride (KCl), magnesium chloride (MgCl2), calcium chloride (CaCl2) or mixtures [36]. Discrimination testing revealed that all breads where 50% NaCl was systematically substituted by different combinations of salts were identified as different (dough properties, bread quality, appearance and sensory perception) from the control, apart from the 50% KCl and the 40% KCl with 10% MgCl2 breads [37]. However, in rheological tests, Marco et al. [38] observed that KCl significantly decreased protein interaction, possibly weakening the gluten network, but this effect was not observed in the specific volume of the final product.

3.2.2. Color

The color of bread is a crucial characteristic that influences the consumers’ choices. Figure 4 illustrates the color coordinates of control bread (CB) with NaCl and breads B50 and B100, with S. perennis powder. Regarding bread color, the substitution of sodium chloride by S. perennis powder allowed a more colored and darker crumb with a lower L* parameter and a higher greener (a* negative) and yellow (b* positive) parameters. Comparing B50 with B100, it is also observed that the increase of halophyte powder addition turned the bread color more greenish and yellowish. The increase of crumb color intensity can be attributed to the higher addition of natural pigments such as carotenoids and chlorophyll present in S. perennis powder. Moreover, the higher yellow appearance with the increase of S. perennis addition can be explained by the degradation of pigments during baking, producing brown-colored compounds. This finding is in accordance with the results obtained by Clavel-Coibrié el al. [23] with the addition of the same halophyte powder in snacks. The whiteness index of bread control was 69.7 and decreased from 55.2 (B50) to 49.2 (B100) with the increased halophyte powder addition.
Moreover, the chromaticity (C*) also increased from the control bread (14.22) to bread with the addition of S. perennis, being 27.04 and 32.86 to B50 and B100, respectively. The overall assessment of the change in colour, measured as total color difference (TCD), with the addition of S. perennis was 15.6 to B50 and 22.2 to B100. Considering these values, it was possible to observe that the addition of Sarcocornia powder introduced a perceptible change in the color of the bread.

3.2.3. Texture

As color, bread texture is a determinant attribute to define the quality of bread and the acceptance of this product. The hardness of control, B50 and B100 bread samples is represented in Figure 5. For the three samples, no significant difference was observed in comparison with the control bread. This finding agreed with the results of Clavel-Coibrié et al. [23] where no significant difference of hardness was observed in crackers with incorporation up to 10% of S. perennis in comparison with the control cracker. However, Toumi et al. [29] referred that the hardness value decreased in bread samples prepared with the high level of Salicornia powder (1.8%), as compared with the hardness of bread with 1.8% sodium chloride. This different behavior may be due to the presence of other factors, such as the amount of powder halophyte, baking time, temperature.
Springiness, cohesiveness and resilience of bread samples were not affected by the replacement of sodium chloride by S. perennis powder (Figure 4). Similarly, Toumi et al. [29] observed that these texture parameters were not affected by salt amount or NaCl/Salicornia ratio in bread preparation.
However, NaCl reduction with chloride potassium resulted in bread with higher firmness [38].

3.2.4. Proximate Composition

Comparing with control bread sample, the addition of S. perennis powder promoted the increase of all nutrients of bread, as present in Table 4, except for carbohydrates.
Regarding moisture content, the results showed an increase in moisture, particularly from B50 to B100 bread samples. As referred in Section 3.2.1, the increase of bread water content in B50 and B100 samples can be due to the higher retention of water during bread baking with the addition of the hygroscopic powder. The addition of dried halophyte powder increased the ash content of breads due to the minerals of the halophyte powder. Regarding the fat content, the incorporation of Sarcocornia powder on breads increases this nutrient but no significant difference was observed between B50 and B100.In terms of protein, similar values were observed for the breads with the incorporation of halophyte powder and the control bread. In terms of total fibre, insoluble and soluble fiber the content B50 and B100 breads increased by two and three folds, respectively. These higher values result from the higher fibre content of halophyte, compared to wheat flour. Indeed, the B50 and B100 breads can be claimed as a source of fibre since the products contains more than 3 g fibre per 100 g. In addition, the B100 bread can be almost considered a product high in fibre because its content is near of 6 g of fibre per 100 g [39]. The content of fiber in bread is an important aspect both in the dough behaviour as well as for its well-known health benefits. The carbohydrate content of control, B50 and B100 remained relatively constant as well the caloric value of all samples, ranging from 386.06 to 375.42 kcal/100 g.

3.2.5. Mineral Composition

The mineral composition of control, B50 and B100 breads is presented in Table 5. The control (CB) and B100 samples were prepared with the same amount of sodium (0.47%, flour basis) but obtained from different sources, respectively, sodium chloride and S. perennis powder and B50 was prepared with half of sodium (0.235%, flour basis), obtained from S. perennis powder. As observed in Table 5, the content of sodium in control (CB) and B100 bread was similar while the value was reduced to around half (339.01 mg/100 g) to B50.
In addition, the incorporation of halophyte powder in bread increased their potassium content, which, along with the sodium, regulates the fluid balance in the human body. The ratio of sodium to potassium intake is a greater risk factor for hypertension and cardiovascular diseases than either electrolyte alone. Higher intakes of potassium can attenuate the adverse effects of sodium on blood pressure [40]. Thus, the consumption of bread with incorporation of S. perennis powder allows a balanced of potassium and sodium electrolytes in human body, reducing the risk of cardiovascular disorders, such as high blood pressure. Moreover, the sodium and potassium present in bread are from natural source and not added as salts.
Regarding the other minerals, the addition of halophyte powder led to a significant increase of this macro and micronutrients, particularly in B100 bread sample (Table 5). According to regulation [33] the bread samples can be considered products with a significant amount of calcium, phosphor, iron, and manganese since minerals, per 100 g, are higher than 15% of recommended daily allowances. In addition, the incorporation of S. perennis powder can also contribute to increasing the antioxidant activity of bread, maintaining (B100) or even reducing to half (B50) the sodium content, as compared with control bread (CB). Clavel-Coibrié et al. [23] referred that, compared with control, the incorporation of 5% of S. perennis into cracker led to a significant increase in total phenolic content and antioxidant activity. In fact, halophyte Sarcocornia species usually have a high phenolic content as part of their antioxidant defense mechanism. The main compounds of Sarcocornia ambigua are phenolic acids such as ferulic, caffeic, vanillic and p-coumaric and flavonols (kaempferol and galangin) [41]. S. perennis collected in Portugal, Southern and Tejo estuary have a high phenolic content (ranged from 15.79 mg GAE/g, dw and 20.5 mg GAE/g, dw) and high antioxidant capacity (58.49 mg Trolox/g, dw) [23,25]. Thus, the incorporation of the halophyte in bread can promote health benefits not only due to the reduction of salt but also to the increase of its bioactive compounds.

3.2.6. Microbial Counts

The major problem associated with the microbial contamination in bakery products is the economic losses mainly due mould spoilage, another concern is the possibility of mycotoxins production that may pose serious health risks to humans [42]. As shown in Table 6, the mean bacteria count of the bread samples tested ranged from 2.6 × 102 to 2.4 × 103 Cfu/g on day 2. International microbiological standards recommended units of bacterial counts for dry and ready to eat foods are <104 Cfu/g for total viable bacteria, in our study our counts indicate a good hygienic status of the bread [43].
Concentrations of total yeast and mould counts also showed similar pattern comparing B50 and Control. Higher concentrations were verified in B100 with greater impact if storage is done in a paper bag (6.24 × 104 Cfu/g). Several factors condition the development of deteriorating microorganisms, having the greatest impact, water activity, concentration of salts and other compounds that can act as preservatives [44]. In this sense the greater amount of fibre and the hygroscopic nature of S. perennis powder allowed a greater water retention promoting the development of microorganisms in B100. However, in B50 the impact of water activity is minor, and it is still compensated by the prevalence of some minerals such as sodium, potassium and magnesium and phenolic compounds with antioxidant activity [45]. Some studies showed different salts as sodium chloride (NaCl), potassium chloride (KCl), magnesium chloride (MgCl2) acts as preservative in bread, led to the slowest colony growth rates and delayed lag phase of the microorganisms like coliforms as Escherichia coli or moulds as Penicillium sp. and Aspergillus sp. [46]. Antioxidant compounds used in bakery products have a high antimicrobial activity against Staphylococcus aureus, Salmonella typhimurium and inhibited growth and toxin production of Aspergillus sp. and Bacillus species.

3.2.7. Sensory Analysis

Figure 6 shows the results of the sensory evaluation of three bread samples (CB, B50 and B100): aspect, color, aroma, texture, flavor and overall acceptance; all expressed in the scale from 1 (dislike extremely) to 9 (like extremely).
Globally, the control bread was the preferred one concerning the sensory attributes, which is in line with the novelty of the bread samples with Sarcocornia powder [23]. Similar trend was observed to crakers with the incorporation of this dried halophyte. However, the texture score to control bread is very similar to the scores to B50 and B100 bread with the incorporation of Sarcocornia powder which is in accordance with the texture parameters. As concerns B50 and B100 bread samples, the scores are similar to all the evalauted sensorial attributes and their acceptance was good. One interesting point is that the reduction of sodium to half (0.235% sodium (flour basis) in bread (B50) did not affect the acceptability of tasters, as compared with B100 (0.47% sodium (flour basis)). One strategy to increase bread palatability with the S. perennis incorparation could be the gradual reduction of NaCl and the increase of the halophyte powder to acustomize the consumers to the changed taste, whereby the new level of powder remains unnoticed by most consumers.
Gorman et al. [47] proposed the inclusion of brown seaweed (4% substitution for flour) as an ingredient that could help reduce the salt content. The seaweed bread made with 10% and 20% salt reduction was not significantly different than the control and was acceptable to consumers and associated with soft, chewy and having no aftertaste. However, the increase in bread salt reduction (up to 50%) was associated with negative flavour and textural attributes. Furthermore, the saltiness perception also decreased, and the formulations were not well-liked by consumers.
Likewise, the use of potassium chloride as sodium choride replacement allowed to heterogeneity in consumer hedonic reaction, mainly associated with differences in texture perception. Moreover, NaCl replacement equal to or higher than 40% caused an increase in bitterness, off-flavor, and metallic flavor [48]. However, Marco et al. [38] considered that it was possible to replace up to 50% of NaCl with KCl without reducing quality and consumer acceptability. Extending past purely KCl being used to replace NaCl, Sinesio et al. [49] and Raffo et al. [50] observed that NaCl replacement with PanSalt® (NaCl 57%, other salts and minor ingredients) at 1.5% or 3% failed to maintain the saltiness level of bread and turned it sweeter compared to the NaCl counterparts. However, the overall flavour intensity of bread with 1.5% PanSalt® did not differ from 1.5% NaCl bread and no undesirable flavours were perceived. Moreover, the overall liking did not differ between the 1.5% NaCl and 1.5% PanSalt® breads but the higher value of PanSalt® produced a perceptible increase in bitter taste and aftertaste in the crust. These finding emphasize that replacing NaCl with KCl-based replacers could impact in the overall flavour perception rather than the perception of salty taste.
Moreover, the bread salt-reduction claims influence sensory expectations and perception. Thus, it is critical to determine the quantity of NaCl replacement without affecting the product’s characteristics and sensory attributes and to familiarize the consumers with the changed taste, regarless of the sodium reduction strategy used to replace salt.

4. Conclusions

Healthier bread was successfully developed with the incorporation of S. perennis as a salt (NaCl) substitute. Powder dried S. perennis was incorporated to replace the same amount of bread sodium (0.47%, flour basis) and half of the sodium concentration (0.235%, flour basis). The S. perennis powder revealed to be a valuable ingredient for the development of bread with lower sodium and improved nutritional, mineral and functional properties. Furthermore, the substitution of salt with halophyte powder did not exhibit a noteworthy influence on the handling of dough.
Bread with halophyte powder is a good source of nutrients, especially fibre, and with a significant amount (higher than 15% of recommended daily allowances) of calcium, phosphor, iron, and manganese per 100 g. Moreover, the consumption of this bread allows a balanced ratio of potassium and sodium electrolytes in the human body. Besides the improvement of bread quality, bread samples with 0.47% Na and 0.235% Na (flour basis) were both sensorily well accepted. Besides this, the bread with 0.235% Na (flour basis) is a potential strategy to obtain a sodium reduction of 50% in bread, reducing the overall sodium daily intake and bringing important health benefits. Since this bread has a guarantee of quality in microbiological terms and taking into account its composition allows controlling the growth and development of microorganisms capable of deteriorating these products, it can avoid health problems associated with the production of mycotoxins, as well as not lead to economic losses in this industry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.J.B. and A.M.d.S.; methodology, C.F., S.R. and N.O.; software, R.G., C.F. and M.J.B.; validation, R.G., M.J.B. and A.M.d.S.; formal analysis, M.J.B., A.M.d.S. and R.G.; investigation, M.J.B. and A.M.d.S.; resources, C.F., S.R., M.J.B. and A.M.d.S.; data curation, M.J.B. and R.G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.J.B., A.M.d.S. and N.O.; writing—review and editing, M.J.B. and R.G.; visualization, M.J.B. and A.M.d.S.; supervision, M.J.B. and A.M.d.S.; project administration, M.J.B. and A.M.d.S.; funding acquisition, A.M.d.S. and M.J.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Ignition Project PEARLS from Project INOVC+, CENTRO-01-0246-FEDER-0000044, co-financed by Centro 2020, Portugal 2020 and European Union Regional Fund, and Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), UIDB/00070/2020 research unit.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

A very special thanks is owed to the bakery Tertulia de Sabores (Coimbra) for producing the bread samples. Author Raquel Guiné would like to thank the CERNAS Research Centre (UIDB/00681/2020), the FCT—Foundation for Science and Technology (Portugal), and the Polytechnic Institute of Viseu for their support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Statsenko:, E.S.; Korneva, N.Y.; Pokotilo, O.V.; Litvinenko, O.V. Development of Technology for Producing Wheat Bread Enriched with Soy Ingredient. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2023, 29, 97–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Adamczyk, G.; Ivanišová, E.; Kaszuba, J.; Bobel, I.; Khvostenko, K.; Chmiel, M.; Falendysh, N. Quality Assessment of Wheat Bread Incorporating Chia Seeds. Foods 2021, 10, 2376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Barros, J.H.; Franco, C.M. Changes in Rheology, Quality, and Staling of White Breads Enriched with Medium-Polymerized Inulin. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2022, 28, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bourekoua, H.; Gawlik-Dziki, U.; Różyło, R.; Zidoune, M.N.; Dziki, D. Acerola Fruit as a Natural Antioxidant Ingredient for Gluten-Free Bread: An Approach to Improve Bread Quality. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2021, 27, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Elkatry, H.O.; Ahmed, A.R.; El-Beltagi, H.S.; Mohamed, H.I.; Eshak, N.S. Biological Activities of Grape Seed By-Products and Their Potential Use as Natural Sources of Food Additives in the Production of Balady Bread. Foods 2022, 11, 1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gallo, V.; Romano, A.; Ferranti, P.; D’Auria, G.; Masi, P. Properties and in Vitro Digestibility of a Bread Enriched with Lentil Flour at Different Leavening Times. Food Struct. 2022, 33, 100284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gao, Y.; Liu, T.; Su, C.; Li, Q.; Yu, X. Fortification of Chinese Steamed Bread with Flaxseed Flour and Evaluation of Its Physicochemical and Sensory Properties. Food Chem. X 2022, 13, 100267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gumul, D.; Ziobro, R.; Korus, J.; Kruczek, M. Apple Pomace as a Source of Bioactive Polyphenol Compounds in Gluten-Free Breads. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Junejo, S.A.; Rashid, A.; Yang, L.; Xu, Y.; Kraithong, S.; Zhou, Y. Effects of Spinach Powder on the Physicochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Durum Wheat Bread. LWT 2021, 150, 112058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Montevecchi, G.; Santunione, G.; Licciardello, F.; Köker, Ö.; Masino, F.; Antonelli, A. Enrichment of Wheat Flour with Spirulina. Evaluation of Thermal Damage to Essential Amino Acids during Bread Preparation. Food Res. Int. 2022, 157, 111357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pycia, K.; Ivanišová, E. Physicochemical and Antioxidant Properties of Wheat Bread Enriched with Hazelnuts and Walnuts. Foods 2020, 9, 1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wójcik, M.; Różyło, R.; Schönlechner, R.; Matwijczuk, A.; Dziki, D. Low-Carbohydrate, High-Protein, and Gluten-Free Bread Supplemented with Poppy Seed Flour: Physicochemical, Sensory, and Spectroscopic Properties. Molecules 2022, 27, 1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cacak-Pietrzak, G.; Różyło, R.; Dziki, D.; Gawlik-Dziki, U.; Sułek, A.; Biernacka, B. Cistus Incanus L. as an Innovative Functional Additive to Wheat Bread. Foods 2019, 8, 349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Maietti, A.; Tedeschi, P.; Catani, M.; Stevanin, C.; Pasti, L.; Cavazzini, A.; Marchetti, N. Nutrient Composition and Antioxidant Performances of Bread-Making Products Enriched with Stinging Nettle (Urtica Dioica) Leaves. Foods 2021, 10, 938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Webster, J.L.; Dunford, E.K.; Neal, B.C. A Systematic Survey of the Sodium Contents of Processed Foods. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2010, 91, 413–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Riis, N.L.; Lassen, A.D.; Bjoernsbo, K.; Toft, U.; Trolle, E. Dietary Effects of Introducing Salt-Reduced Bread with and without Dietary Counselling-A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial. Nutrients 2022, 14, 3852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. WHO. Guideline: Sodium Intake for Adults and Children; World Health Organization (WHO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. WHO. Report of the Formal Meeting of Member States to Conclude the Work on the Comprehensive Global Monitoring Framework, Including Indicators, and a Set of Voluntary Global Targets for the Prevention and Control of Non-Communicable Diseases; World Health Organization (WHO): Geneva, Switzerland, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  19. Custódio, L.; Rodrigues, M.J.; Pereira, C.G.; Castañeda-Loaiza, V.; Fernandes, E.; Standing, D.; Neori, A.; Shpigel, M.; Sagi, M. A Review on Sarcocornia Species: Ethnopharmacology, Nutritional Properties, Phytochemistry, Biological Activities and Propagation. Foods 2021, 10, 2778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sánchez-Gavilán, I.; Ramírez Chueca, E.; de la Fuente García, V. Bioactive Compounds in Sarcocornia and Arthrocnemum, Two Wild Halophilic Genera from the Iberian Peninsula. Plants 2021, 10, 2218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. De La Fuente, V.; Rufo, L.; Rodríguez, N.; Sánchez-Mata, D.; Franco, A.; Amils, R. A Study of Sarcocornia, A.J. Scott (Chenopodiaceae) from Western Mediterranean Europe. Plant Biosyst. 2016, 150, 343–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Barroca, M.J.; Guiné, R.P.F.; Amado, A.M.; Ressurreição, S.; da Silva, A.M.; Marques, M.P.M.; de Carvalho, L.A.E.B. The Drying Process of Sarcocornia Perennis: Impact on Nutritional and Physico-Chemical Properties. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 4443–4458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Clavel-Coibrié, E.; Sales, J.R.; da Silva, A.M.; Barroca, M.J.; Sousa, I.; Raymundo, A. Sarcocornia Perennis: A Salt Substitute in Savory Snacks. Foods 2021, 10, 3110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Petropoulos, S.A.; Karkanis, A.; Martins, N.; Ferreira, I.C.F.R. Edible Halophytes of the Mediterranean Basin: Potential Candidates for Novel Food Products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 74, 69–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Barreira, L.; Resek, E.; Rodrigues, M.J.; Rocha, M.I.; Pereira, H.; Bandarra, N.; da Silva, M.M.; Varela, J.; Custódio, L. Halophytes: Gourmet Food with Nutritional Health Benefits? J. Food Compos. Anal. 2017, 59, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Gargouri, M.; Magné, C.; Dauvergne, X.; Ksouri, R.; El Feki, A.; Metges, M.-A.G.; Talarmin, H. Cytoprotective and Antioxidant Effects of the Edible Halophyte Sarcocornia Perennis L. (Swampfire) against Lead-Induced Toxicity in Renal Cells. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 95, 44–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Pereira, T.; Caldeira, A.T.; Caseiro, A.; Osório, N.; da Silva, A.M.; Barroca, M.J. Randomized Pilot Study on the Effects of Sarcocornia as a Salt Substitute in Arterial Blood Pressure and Vascular Function in Healthy Young Adults. Foods 2022, 11, 2888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lopes, M.; Cavaleiro, C.; Ramos, F. Sodium Reduction in Bread: A Role for Glasswort (Salicornia ramosissima J. Woods). Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2017, 16, 1056–1071. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Toumi, O.; Conte, P.; Maria Gonçalves Moreira da Silva, A.; João Barroca, M.; Fadda, C. Use of Response Surface Methodology to Investigate the Effect of Sodium Chloride Substitution with Salicornia ramosissima Powder in Common Wheat Dough and Bread. J. Funct. Foods 2022, 99, 105349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pires, A.; Agreira, S.; Ressurreição, S.; Marques, J.; Guiné, R.; Barroca, M.J.; Moreira da Silva, A. Sea Purslane as an Emerging Food Crop: Nutritional and Biological Studies. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Djordjević, M.; Šoronja-Simović, D.; Nikolić, I.; Djordjević, M.; Šereš, Z.; Milašinović-Šeremešić, M. Sugar Beet and Apple Fibres Coupled with Hydroxypropylmethylcellulose as Functional Ingredients in Gluten-Free Formulations: Rheological, Technological and Sensory Aspects. Food Chem. 2019, 295, 189–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cunniff, P. (Ed.) Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 16th ed.; 3rd rev.; AOAC International: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 1997; ISBN 978-0-935584-54-7. [Google Scholar]
  33. European Union. Regulation (EU) No 1169/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2011; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  34. Kosová, K.; Práil, I.T.; Vítámvás, P. Protein Contribution to Plant Salinity Response and Tolerance Acquisition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 6757–6789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Milić, D.; Luković, J.; Ninkov, J.; Zeremski-Škorić, T.; Zorić, L.; Vasin, J.; Milić, S. Heavy Metal Content in Halophytic Plants from Inland and Maritime Saline Areas. Cent. Eur. J. Biol. 2012, 7, 307–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Dunteman, A.; Yang, Y.; McKenzie, E.; Lee, Y.; Lee, S.-Y. Sodium Reduction Technologies Applied to Bread Products and Their Impact on Sensory Properties: A Review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 56, 4396–4407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Reißner, A.-M.; Wendt, J.; Zahn, S.; Rohm, H. Sodium-Chloride Reduction by Substitution with Potassium, Calcium and Magnesium Salts in Wheat Bread. LWT 2019, 108, 153–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marco, E.R.; Navarro, J.L.; León, A.E.; Steffolani, M.E. Sodium Chloride Replacement by Potassium Chloride in Bread: Determination of Sensorial Potassium Threshold and Effect on Dough Properties and Breadmaking Quality. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2022, 27, 100486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. European Union. Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 December 2006; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  40. Levings, J.L.; Gunn, J.P. The Imbalance of Sodium and Potassium Intake: Implications for Dietetic Practice. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 2014, 114, 838–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bertin, R.L.; Gonzaga, L.V.; Borges, G.d.S.C.; Azevedo, M.S.; Maltez, H.F.; Heller, M.; Micke, G.A.; Tavares, L.B.B.; Fett, R. Nutrient Composition and, Identification/Quantification of Major Phenolic Compounds in Sarcocornia Ambigua (Amaranthaceae) Using HPLC–ESI-MS/MS. Food Res. Int. 2014, 55, 404–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Saranraj, D.P. Microbial Spoilage of Bakery Products and Its Control by Preservatives. Int. J. Pharm. Biol. Arch. 2012, 3, 38–48. [Google Scholar]
  43. Ijah, U.J.J.; Auta, H.S.; Aduloju, M.O.; Aransiola, S.A. Microbiological, Nutritional, and Sensory Quality of Bread Produced from Wheat and Potato Flour Blends. Int. J. Food Sci. 2014, 2014, 671701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Debonne, E.; De Leyn, I.; Verwaeren, J.; Moens, S.; Devlieghere, F.; Eeckhout, M.; Van Bockstaele, F. The Influence of Natural Oils of Blackcurrant, Black Cumin Seed, Thyme and Wheat Germ on Dough and Bread Technological and Microbiological Quality. LWT 2018, 93, 212–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Nanditha, B.; Prabhasankar, P. Antioxidants in Bakery Products: A Review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2009, 49, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Nahar, N.; Madzuki, I.; Izzah, N.; Ab Karim, M.; Mohd Ghazali, H.; Karim, R. Bakery Science of Bread and the Effect of Salt Reduction on Quality: A Review. Borneo J. Sci. Technol. 2019, 1, 9–14. [Google Scholar]
  47. Gorman, M.; Moss, R.; Barker, S.; Falkeisen, A.; Knowles, S.; McSweeney, M.B. Consumer Perception of Salt-Reduced Bread with the Addition of Brown Seaweed Evaluated under Blinded and Informed Conditions. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2023, 103, 2337–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Antúnez, L.; Giménez, A.; Vidal, L.; Ares, G. Partial Replacement of NaCl with KCl in Bread: Effect on Sensory Characteristics and Consumer Perception. J. Sens. Stud. 2018, 33, e12441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sinesio, F.; Raffo, A.; Peparaio, M.; Moneta, E.; Saggia Civitelli, E.; Narducci, V.; Turfani, V.; Ferrari Nicoli, S.; Carcea, M. Impact of Sodium Reduction Strategies on Volatile Compounds, Sensory Properties and Consumer Perception in Commercial Wheat Bread. Food Chem. 2019, 301, 125252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Raffo, A.; Carcea, M.; Moneta, E.; Narducci, V.; Nicoli, S.; Peparaio, M.; Sinesio, F.; Turfani, V. Influence of Different Levels of Sodium Chloride and of a Reduced-Sodium Salt Substitute on Volatiles Formation and Sensory Quality of Wheat Bread. J. Cereal Sci. 2018, 79, 518–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Dried Sarcocornia perennis powder.
Figure 1. Dried Sarcocornia perennis powder.
Applsci 13 05342 g001
Figure 2. Automatic mixer (a) and rounded and molded samples (b).
Figure 2. Automatic mixer (a) and rounded and molded samples (b).
Applsci 13 05342 g002
Figure 3. Samples breads: CB—control bread (1.2% NaCl/0.47% sodium, flour basis); B50—0.235% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder and B100—0.47% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder.
Figure 3. Samples breads: CB—control bread (1.2% NaCl/0.47% sodium, flour basis); B50—0.235% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder and B100—0.47% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder.
Applsci 13 05342 g003
Figure 4. Color parameters lightness (L*), greenness (a*), yellowness (b*) of bread without S. perennis. CB—control bread (1.2% NaCl/0.47% sodium, flour basis); B50—0.235% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder and B100—0.47% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder. Sample breads with different letters on the same color parameter are significantly different (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05).
Figure 4. Color parameters lightness (L*), greenness (a*), yellowness (b*) of bread without S. perennis. CB—control bread (1.2% NaCl/0.47% sodium, flour basis); B50—0.235% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder and B100—0.47% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder. Sample breads with different letters on the same color parameter are significantly different (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05).
Applsci 13 05342 g004
Figure 5. Hardness, springiness, cohesiveness and resilience of bread: CB—control bread (1.2% NaCl/0.47% sodium, flour basis); B50—0.235% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder and B100—0.47% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder. Sample breads with different letters on the same texture parameter are significantly different (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05).
Figure 5. Hardness, springiness, cohesiveness and resilience of bread: CB—control bread (1.2% NaCl/0.47% sodium, flour basis); B50—0.235% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder and B100—0.47% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder. Sample breads with different letters on the same texture parameter are significantly different (one-way ANOVA, p < 0.05).
Applsci 13 05342 g005aApplsci 13 05342 g005b
Figure 6. Responses of the sensory analysis panel tasters (n = 67) to CB—control bread (1.2% NaCl/0.47% sodium, flour basis); B50—0.235% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder and B100—0.47% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder.
Figure 6. Responses of the sensory analysis panel tasters (n = 67) to CB—control bread (1.2% NaCl/0.47% sodium, flour basis); B50—0.235% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder and B100—0.47% sodium (flour basis) obtained from S. perennis powder.
Applsci 13 05342 g006
Table 1. Bread formulations to control (CB), B50 and B100 bread samples.
Table 1. Bread formulations to control (CB), B50 and B100 bread samples.
IngredientsCBB50B100
Wheat flour T65 (g)100010001000
Water (mL)600600600
Dough Strengthener131313
Sugar (g)111111
Dry baker’s yeast (g)777
Salt (NaCl) (g)12--
S. perennis powder (g)-30.8561.7
Table 2. Proximate composition of dried S. perennis (powder).
Table 2. Proximate composition of dried S. perennis (powder).
Biochemical Compounds (g/100 g)
Moisture content6.42 ± 0.05
Total lipids0.85 ± 0.03
Protein11.28 ± 0.08
Crude fiber9.84 ± 0.06
Total dietary fiber23.18 ± 0.05
Insoluble dietary fiber19.99 ± 0.03
Soluble dietary fiber3.19 ± 0.03
Carbohydrates14.79 ± 0.10
Total ash33.84 ± 0.03
Minerals (mg/100 g)
Sodium (Na)7614.12 ± 49.78
Potassium (K)1116.57 ± 11.84
Calcium (Ca)275.81 ± 6.32
Magnesium (Mg)510.80 ± 8.94
Phosphor (P)144.22 ± 1.96
Iron (Fe)11.54 ± 050
Copper (Cu)1.09 ± 0.09
Zinc (Zn)2.98 ± 0.08
Manganese (Mn)2.97 ± 0.07
Table 3. Physical characteristics of control (CB), B50 and B100 bread samples.
Table 3. Physical characteristics of control (CB), B50 and B100 bread samples.
CBB50B100
Total baking loss (%)13.514.19.5
Weight (g)71.2 ± 1.873.4 ± 1.876.42 ± 2.0
Specific volume (cm3/g)3.243.503.66
Table 4. Moisture content (g 100 g−1 WB) and proximate composition of control (CB), B50 and B100 bread samples (g 100 g−1 DB).
Table 4. Moisture content (g 100 g−1 WB) and proximate composition of control (CB), B50 and B100 bread samples (g 100 g−1 DB).
CBB50B100
Moisture34.06 ± 0.07 c34.75 ± 0.10 b36.19 ± 0.10 a
Ash2.56 ± 0.01 b2.28 ± 0.02 c3.16 ± 0.03 a
Fat0.11 ± 0.01 b0.44 ± 0.03 a0.38 ± 0.05 a
Protein11.13 ± 0.18 b11.19 ± 0.02 b11.48 ± 0.05 a
Total Fibre2.15 ± 0.14 c4.40 ± 0.12 b6.83 ± 0.15 a
Fibre insoluble0.25 ± 0.08 b0.54 ± 0.06 b1.05 ± 0.12 a
Fibre soluble1.91 ± 0.06 c3.85 ± 0.18 b5.78 ± 0.03 a
Carbohydrates84.00 ± 0.3581.70 ± 0.1178.17 ± 0.23
Energy (kcal/100 g)386.06 ± 0.21 a384.25 ± 0.01 b375.42 ± 0.16 c
Energy (J/100 g)1616.35 ± 0.86 a1608.75 ± 0.02 b1571.84 ± 0.69 c
Different lowercase letters correspond to significant differences (p < 0.05) between bread samples.
Table 5. Mineral composition (mg 100 g−1 DB) of control (CB), B50 and B100 bread samples.
Table 5. Mineral composition (mg 100 g−1 DB) of control (CB), B50 and B100 bread samples.
MineralCBB50B100
Na613.40 ± 11.01 a339.01 ± 5.38 b643.65 ± 14.08 a
K152.43 ± 6.71195.63 ± 2.54243.71 ± 2.36
Ca393.27 ± 15.29 b401.09 ± 1.90 b444.11 ± 4.96 a
P370.04 ± 7.53 b379.53 ± 5.97 a,b397.66 ± 1.71 a
Mg40.28 ± 4.75 b48.80 ± 1.18 b68.81 ± 5.03 a
Fe3.26 ± 0.02 b4.87 ± 0.23 a5.52 ± 0.27 a
Zn0.89 ± 0.01 b0.99 ± 0.02 a1.00 ± 0.02 a
Cu0.33 ± 0.01 b0.43 ± 0.02 a0.37 ± 0.01 b
Mn0.92 ± 0.02 b1.01 ± 0.05 a,b1.10 ± 0.05 a
Different lowercase letters correspond to significant differences (p < 0.05) between bread samples.
Table 6. Microbiological analysis: Cfu/g (colony forming units per gram) to control (CB), B50 and B100 bread samples.
Table 6. Microbiological analysis: Cfu/g (colony forming units per gram) to control (CB), B50 and B100 bread samples.
TVBC-2dYMC-2dCC-2dTVBC-4dYMC-4dCC-4d
(a)CB2.9 × 1027 × 101NG3.5 × 1031.2 × 103NG
B503 × 1029 × 101NG6.8 × 1031.4 × 103NG
B1001.9 × 1031.6 × 103NG7.36 × 1041.84 × 104NG
(b)CB9.7 × 1027.4 × 102NG4.06 × 1041.32 × 104NG
B502.6 × 1021.9 × 102NG5.28 × 1044.1 × 104NG
B1002.4 × 1032.4 × 103NG8.9 × 1046.2 × 104NG
NG: no growth detected (a): bread samples were stored in a cloth bag; (b): bread samples were stored in a paper bag; TVBC-2d: Total viable bacteria counts after 2 days; YMC-2d: Yeasts and molds counts after 2 days; CC-2d: Coliforms counts after 2 days; TVBC-4d: Total viable bacteria counts after 4 days; YMC-4d: Yeasts and molds counts after 4 days; CC-4d: Coliforms counts after 4 days.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barroca, M.J.; Flores, C.; Ressurreição, S.; Guiné, R.; Osório, N.; Moreira da Silva, A. Re-Thinking Table Salt Reduction in Bread with Halophyte Plant Solutions. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 5342. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095342

AMA Style

Barroca MJ, Flores C, Ressurreição S, Guiné R, Osório N, Moreira da Silva A. Re-Thinking Table Salt Reduction in Bread with Halophyte Plant Solutions. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(9):5342. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095342

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barroca, Maria João, Catarina Flores, Sandrine Ressurreição, Raquel Guiné, Nádia Osório, and Aida Moreira da Silva. 2023. "Re-Thinking Table Salt Reduction in Bread with Halophyte Plant Solutions" Applied Sciences 13, no. 9: 5342. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095342

APA Style

Barroca, M. J., Flores, C., Ressurreição, S., Guiné, R., Osório, N., & Moreira da Silva, A. (2023). Re-Thinking Table Salt Reduction in Bread with Halophyte Plant Solutions. Applied Sciences, 13(9), 5342. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13095342

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop