Next Article in Journal
A Heuristic Approach to Support Route Planning for Delivery and Installation of Furniture: A Case Study
Previous Article in Journal
An Emotional Model Based on Fuzzy Logic and Social Psychology for a Personal Assistant Robot
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Blind Space Time Block Coding Categorization over AF Relaying Broadcasts

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(5), 3283; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053283
by Mohamed Marey 1,*,† and Hala Mostafa 2,*,†
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(5), 3283; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13053283
Submission received: 7 February 2023 / Revised: 28 February 2023 / Accepted: 2 March 2023 / Published: 4 March 2023

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear authors,

shorten the Introduction section. Try to briefly outline which part (obviously,the STBC) is relevant to your contribution. Improve your English. For example, on page 6, the sentence "have any discernible relationship" should be written more accurately, "are statistically independent". What is the r.v. Ψ in (16) exactly? Redefine it properly.

Author Response

We are grateful for the constructive feedback from the Reviewer, which has helped us strengthen the manuscript. Please see the attached file. 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Although, the authors present a revolutionary strategy for categorizing STBC signals that can be implemented in amplify-and-forward relaying networks with a mathematical model, there are some comments that must be considered in the revised manuscript which are

1. In equation (12), the value for otherwise is not written which I think is zero.

2. In the explanation of figure 4, authors said that " the STBC α = c2 show spikes when τ = ±2 at the FFT bins 0, M/4-1, M/2-1, and 3M/4-1" while at τ = ±1, there are also spikes but having I0(n) greater than that at τ = ±2 so why you did not mention that?

3. Results need to be explained well with numerical values as no numerical values mentioned in the explanation of figures 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, and 11.

4. The place of figures need to be readjusted as the place of figure 8 in conclusion section and figures 9, 10, and 11 appear in references, while these figures must be placed in results section after their explanation.

Author Response

We are grateful for the constructive feedback from the Reviewer, which has helped us strengthen the manuscript. Please see the attached file. 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report


Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

We are grateful for the constructive feedback from the Reviewer, which has helped us strengthen the manuscript. Please see the attached file. 

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop