Load and Deformation Analysis in Experimental and Numerical Studies of Full-Size Wooden Beams Reinforced with Prestressed FRP and Steel Bars

The use of composite precast or steel bars as reinforcements for timber beams is an important technique that can improve effectiveness or allow cross sections to be reduced. This paper presents experimental, theoretical, and numerical studies of full-size timber beams measuring 82 × 162 × 3650 mm³ using prestressed steel bars and 10 mm diameter basalt and glass bars with a prestress of 10 MPa. In addition, parametric studies were carried out using FEM numerical simulations. In the experimental tests, an increase in load-bearing capacity and stiffness of up to 58% and 10.7% for steel bars, 32% and 10.1% for basalt bars, and 27% and 7.8% for glass bars, respectively, was obtained compared to unreinforced beams. The different levels of improvement in reinforcement efficiency was also related to the different elastic modulus of the reinforcement itself. Unreinforced beams showed a linear elastic range. In contrast, on beams reinforced with steel bars, the curve had a slightly steeper line than the control beam, and the slope of the curve then decreased when a certain load was reached. All beams failed when the lower wood fibers reached maximum tensile strain. The allowable compressive strain then decreased by 36.6% for basalt bars, 32.9% for glass bars, and 30.4% for steel bars. The use of prestressing further exploited the strength of the reinforcement beyond the yield point. All unreinforced beams primarily failed in the tension zone due to fracture of the timber fibers. Prestressed and reinforced beams were already failing due to bending and shear. The experimental and numerical analysis was also compared, and the results showed a good agreement and a maximum difference of approximately 5.7%.