Next Article in Journal
A Novel Model-Free Adaptive Proportional–Integral–Derivative Control Method for Speed-Tracking Systems of Electric Balanced Forklifts
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of Inner Lining Loss and Correlation with Steel Structure Ovality in Rotary Kilns
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 13
Issue 23
10.3390/app132312815
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Systematic Review
Peer-Review Record

User Experience of Older People While Using Digital Health Technologies: A Systematic Review

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(23), 12815; https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312815
by Eiko Takano 1,*, Hisataka Maruyama 2, Tetsuta Takahashi 3, Kouki Mori 2, Kota Nishiyori 3, Yoshifumi Morita 3, Toshio Fukuda 4, Izumi Kondo 1 and Yutaka Ishibashi 3
Reviewer 1:
Rabindra Bista
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(23), 12815; https://doi.org/10.3390/app132312815
Submission received: 5 October 2023 / Revised: 11 November 2023 / Accepted: 24 November 2023 / Published: 29 November 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Robotics and Automation)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

The area of survey is interesting. However, this paper can be improved by considering following points.

1. How about including general system diagram for the digital health technology showing its different components?

2. Please define user-centric healthcare technology and discuss on some of the representative approaches to address it. 

3. In the discussion section, please present a comparative table for different tools you analyzed. Compare them on the basis of the domain specific relevant parameters, and rank them. It makes the idea you presented more clear.

4. Since usability and satisfaction are subjective perceptions they can't be generalized. How would you address them?

5. If possible, please show that how this review is different from other review process. Any new element/s have been added to add the value of the work?

 

 

Comments on the Quality of English Language

Minor proof reading is necessary.

Author Response

Thanks to the insightful comments from the reviewers, we were able to make significant improvements to the paper. The revisions have been highlighted in blue text in the manuscript. Additionally, we have documented them in a PDF in a question-and-answer format. We appreciate the valuable feedback from the reviewers.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Dear authors, 

Thank you for submitting your work on this topic. I enjoyed reading it and I see the value of it. I have attached additional comments to help revise your paper. 

Thanks 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thanks to the insightful comments from the reviewers, we were able to make significant improvements to the paper. The revisions have been highlighted in blue text in the manuscript. Additionally, we have documented them in a PDF in a question-and-answer format. We appreciate the valuable feedback from the reviewers.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop