Next Article in Journal
Nano-/Microcapsules, Liposomes, and Micelles in Polysaccharide Carriers: Applications in Food Technology
Previous Article in Journal
Social Network Sentiment Analysis Using Hybrid Deep Learning Models
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comparative Study of Damage-Sensitive Features for Rapid Data-Driven Seismic Structural Health Monitoring
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

State-of-the-Art Structural Health Monitoring in Civil Engineering

1
Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Calabria, Ponte Bucci, Cubo 44/A, 87030 Rende, Italy
2
School of Civil Engineering, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(21), 11609; https://doi.org/10.3390/app132111609
Submission received: 16 October 2023 / Accepted: 19 October 2023 / Published: 24 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Structural Health Monitoring in Civil Engineering)
In the past, when structures contained elements which were prone to deterioration over time (e.g., wood), the maintenance of houses, bridges, etc., was considered vital to allow them to be used safely and to retain their efficacy [1]. With the advent of materials such as reinforced concrete and steel, given their relatively long useful life, periodic and ongoing maintenance has often been considered a secondary element. However, since it was realized that, even for structures made with these materials, their useful life has an end, and that we may be approaching it, planning maintenance has become an important aspect. Thus was born the concept of structural health monitoring (SHM) [2,3,4,5,6].
The goal of SHM is to keep civil engineering works under constant control. To achieve this, multidisciplinary methods have been designed and implemented. In fact, computational mechanics [3]; the static and dynamic analysis of structures, electronics, sensors; and recently the Internet of Things (IoT) and artificial intelligence (AI) have come into play [7,8,9,10,11]. However, it is also important to consider new materials—especially those with intrinsic characteristics of self-diagnosis or nonlinear behaviour and bimodular materials [12]—just as it is important to make use of measurement and survey methods typical of modern geomatics, which also makes use of satellite surveys and uses highly sophisticated laser tools. For these reasons, we proposed this Special Issue which covers all these issues [13,14,15].

1. About the Present Special Issue

Seven interesting contributions are presented in this Special Issue.
The first paper assesses data-driven damage-sensitive features (DSFs) in terms of their potential to identify earthquake-induced damage and manifest nonlinearity in the response of low-to-midrise residential buildings. It is based on a comprehensive simulated analysis of a nonlinear hysteretic spring-mass system and a half-scale building specimen experimentally tested on a shake table.
The second contribution proposes a wavelet-based approach to detect bridge defects using wavelet energy. Furthermore, a damage index, based on component wavelet energy, is developed to localize the damage. A numerical simulation is modelled to verify the feasibility of the proposed approach, and the results show that the proposed method performs well, even when considering road roughness in vehicle and bridge interaction. Moreover, the effects of road surface profile, vehicle velocity, vehicle mass, noise in the signal, and different damage severities on the proposed approach are investigated. The method shows great potential application in bridge health monitoring using indirect measurements from a moving vehicle.
The third paper introduces a novel method to determine a deflection-based damage indicator for railway tracks and bridges using sensors on in-service trains. The concept uses a type of Inverse Newmark-β integration scheme on data from a batch of trains to convert measured accelerations into deflections at the contact point between track and wheel. This in turn is converted into a Moving Reference Influence Line (MR-IL), i.e., a function describing the deflection at a moving point due to a unit load at an adjacent moving point. In a series of blind tests using simulated ‘data’ from an independent research group, the MR-IL functions are shown to be effective in detecting the level of bridge damage.
The paper by Dharap and Nagarajaiah introduces input error function-based observers for the tracking of stiffness degradation in structural members. A modified formulation of the actuator failure detection algorithm results in a unique input error function corresponding to an individual structural member and facilitates the development of a bank of observers to estimate the severity of damage in structural members.
The Guest Editor, Obrien, with his colleagues, Wang and McCrum, have published a paper presenting a new moving force identification (MFI) algorithm that uses measured accelerations to infer applied vehicle forces on bridges. Previous MFI algorithms use strain or bridge deflection measurements, but this approach directly uses accelerations. Statistics of the force histories inferred from accelerations are used in turn as indicators of global bridge damage. The new acceleration-based MFI algorithm (A-MFI) is validated through numerical simulations with a coupled vehicle–bridge dynamic interaction model programmed in MATLAB. A focussed sensitivity study suggests that the results are sensitive to the accuracy of the vehicle velocity data. The inferred Gross Vehicle Weight (GVW), calculated using A-MFI, is proposed as the bridge damage indicator. A real weigh-in-motion database is used with a simulation of vehicle–bridge interaction to validate the concept. The results show that the standard deviation of inferred GVWs has good correlation with the global bridge damage level.
A comprehensive review of the function of AI and its effects on data-based SHM systems, along with those of other technologies, is provided by the other Guest Editor and his co-authors. The influence of ML algorithms, drones, and 3D printers on the way SHM systems work in bridges is the main emphasis of this review.
Blikharskyy et al. conduct a review of digital image correlation and its application to strain measurement in structures. These techniques are non-contact and can provide a full field of deformations. A comparative analysis is carried out on a range of alternative techniques from theoretical and experimental studies.

2. List of Contributions

  • Reuland, Y.; Martakis, P.; Chatzi, E. A Comparative Study of Damage-Sensitive Features for Rapid Data-Driven Seismic Structural Health Monitoring. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 2708. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13042708.
  • Tan, C.; Zhao, H.; Uddin, N.; Yan, B. A Fast Wavelet-Based Bridge Condition Assessment Approach Using Only Moving Vehicle Measurements. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 11277. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122111277.
  • Ren, Y.; OBrien, E.J.; Cantero, D.; Keenahan, J. Railway Bridge Condition Monitoring Using Numerically Calculated Responses from Batches of Trains. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 4972. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12104972.
  • Dharap, P.; Nagarajaiah, S. Tracking of Stiffness Variation in Structural Members Using Input Error Function Observers. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 11857. https://doi.org/10.3390/app112411857.
  • Wang, S.; OBrien, E.J.; McCrum, D.P. A Novel Acceleration-Based Moving Force Identification Algorithm to Detect Global Bridge Damage. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 7271. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11167271.
  • Zinno, R.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Guido, G.; Rashvand, K.; Vitale, A.; Sarhadi, A. The State of the Art of Artificial Intelligence Approaches and New Technologies in Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010097.
  • Blikharskyy, Y.; Kopiika, N.; Khmil, R.; Selejdak, J.; Blikharskyy, Z. Review of Development and Application of Digital Image Correlation Method for Study of Stress–Strain State of RC Structures. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 10157. https://doi.org/10.3390/app121910157.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.Z. and E.J.O.; writing—original draft preparation, R.Z. and E.J.O.; writing—review and editing, R.Z. and E.J.O.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Acknowledgments

The Guest Editors of this Special Issue thank all the authors of the published works who have certainly offered a contribution to establish the state of the art on the subject and to identify new challenges for the near future, relating to all the aspects listed above, for the common purpose of constantly assessing the structural health of civil infrastructures. The Guest Editors express their gratitude for the kind assistance of the editorial office.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Sohn, H.; Farrar, C.R.; Hemez, F.M.; Shunk, D.D.; Stinemates, D.W.; Nadler, B.R.; Czarnecki, J.J. A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001. Los Alamos Natl. Lab. USA 2003, 1, 16. [Google Scholar]
  2. Rytter, A. Vibration Based Inspection of Civil Engineering Structures; Department of Building Technology and Structural Engineering, Aalborg University: Aalborg, Denmark, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  3. Haritos, N.; Owen, J.S. The use of vibration data for damage detection in bridges: A comparison of system identification and pattern recognition approaches. Struct. Health Monitor. 2004, 3, 141–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Tan, X. Review on Vibration-Based Structural Health Monitoring Techniques and Technical Codes. Symmetry 2021, 13, 1998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gopalakrishnan, S.; Ruzzene, M.; Hanagud, S. Computational Techniques for Structural Health Monitoring; Springer Series in Reliability Engineering; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2011; ISBN 978-0-85729-284-1. [Google Scholar]
  6. Junior, V.L.; Steffen, V.; Savi, M.A. Dynamics of Smart Systems and Structures; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  7. Theodoridis, S.; Koutroumbas, K. Pattern recognition and neural networks. In Machine Learning and Its Applications; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2001; pp. 169–195. [Google Scholar]
  8. Cremona, C.; Santos, J. Structural health monitoring as a big-data problem. Struct. Eng. Int. 2018, 28, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Entezami, A.; Sarmadi, H.; Behkamal, B.; Mariani, S. Big Data Analytics and Structural Health Monitoring: A Statistical Pattern Recognition-Based Approach. Sensors 2020, 20, 2328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bigoni, C.; Zhang, Z.; Hesthaven, J.S. Systematic sensor placement for structural anomaly detection in the absence of damaged states. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 2020, 371, 113315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zinno, R.; Haghshenas, S.S.; Guido, G.; Vitale, A. Artificial Intelligence and Structural Health Monitoring of Bridges: A Review of the State-of-the-Art. IEEE Access 2022, 10, 88058–88807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Bruno, D.; Lato, S.; Zinno, R. Nonlinear analysis of doubly curved composite shells of bimodular material. Compos. Eng. 1993, 3, 419–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Malekloo, A.; Ozer, E.; Al-Turjman, F. Combination of GIS and SHM in prognosis and diagnosis of bridges in earthquake-prone locations. In Smart Grid in IoT-Enabled Spaces: The Road to Intelligence in Power; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  14. Barrile, V.; Fotia, A.; Leonardi, G.; Pucinotti, R. Geomatics and Soft Computing Techniques for Infrastructural Monitoring. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Artese, S.; Achilli, V. A gis tool for the management of seismic emergencies in historical centers: How to choose the optimal routes for civil protection interventions. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2019, XLII-2/W11, 99–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zinno, R.; OBrien, E.J. State-of-the-Art Structural Health Monitoring in Civil Engineering. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 11609. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132111609

AMA Style

Zinno R, OBrien EJ. State-of-the-Art Structural Health Monitoring in Civil Engineering. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(21):11609. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132111609

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zinno, Raffaele, and Eugene J. OBrien. 2023. "State-of-the-Art Structural Health Monitoring in Civil Engineering" Applied Sciences 13, no. 21: 11609. https://doi.org/10.3390/app132111609

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop