Next Article in Journal
Application of Machine Learning Methods to Assess Filtration Properties of Host Rocks of Uranium Deposits in Kazakhstan
Next Article in Special Issue
Innovations in Electric Current-Assisted Sintering for SOFC: A Review of Advances in Flash Sintering and Ultrafast High-Temperature Sintering
Previous Article in Journal
Drive on a Greener Way: A Case Study on Navigating Cross-Regional Traffic Networks in South China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Materials Development and Potential Applications of Ceramics: New Opportunities and Challenges

1
School of Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen 518055, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Materials Processing and Die & Mould Technology, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(19), 10957; https://doi.org/10.3390/app131910957
Submission received: 29 August 2023 / Accepted: 3 October 2023 / Published: 4 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Materials Development and Potential Applications of Ceramics)

1. Introduction

Ceramics have been an indispensable part of human civilization for thousands of years. Ceramics, which were initially referred to as pottery or fired clay, have evolved into complex, high-performance materials that play a vital role in modern technology and industry. Ceramics encompass a broad range of materials, spanning both traditional pottery and advanced high-tech devices with a diverse array of applications. Advanced ceramics serve as “bricks” for modern electronics, powering devices such smartphones, computers, wearable equipment, electrical vehicles, and telecommunications infrastructure. Piezoelectric ceramics find use in sensors [1,2], actuators [3,4], and ultrasound technology [5,6,7], while dielectric ceramics are crucial for capacitors [8,9] and resonators [10,11,12] in communication systems. Ceramics’ ability to withstand extreme temperatures and harsh conditions makes them ideal for aerospace [13,14] and defense [15,16] applications. Bioceramics find applications in medical innovations, such as implants [17] and dental prosthetics [18]. Ceramics are also pivotal in clean energy conversion (e.g., solid oxide fuel cells [19]) and energy storage (e.g., solid-state batteries [20]). Ceramic substrates [21] in catalytic converters aid in automobiles’ emission control, while ceramic coatings enhance engine performance and durability [22]. Diesel particulate filters [23] made from advanced ceramics reduce harmful vehicle emissions, and ceramic membranes are used for water purification [24].
In materials science and engineering, materials dictate properties, while processing modifies these properties and microstructures, synergistically affecting the final product’s performance. In recent times, the Materials Genome Initiative (MGI) has opened new opportunities for pioneering innovations and advancements in ceramic materials [25,26,27,28,29,30]. This is achieved through the fusion of high-throughput computation, utilizing multiphysics and multiscale modeling [31,32], machine learning [33,34,35], data-driven methodologies [36,37,38], and high-throughput experimental techniques [39,40,41]. The MGI has brought about transformative changes, revolutionizing the way in which these advanced ceramics materials are designed, synthesized, and optimized. However, while the MGI has transformed the landscape of advanced ceramic materials, challenges remain; data quality, integration of experimental and computational approaches, and the need for advanced characterization techniques are areas that demand ongoing attention. The integration of the MGI with additive manufacturing technologies and the exploration of sustainability aspects in ceramic development are also promising avenues for future research.
Along with the innovation of advanced ceramics materials, the convergence of advanced manufacturing techniques with the realm of ceramic materials has paved the way for unprecedented innovation across various industries. Additive manufacturing (AM), or 3D printing, allows for intricate geometries and customized designs that were previously challenging to achieve [42]. Techniques such as stereolithography [43] and binder jetting [44] enable the layer-by-layer deposition of ceramic powders, resulting in complex structures with tailored porosity and properties. This approach has unlocked new avenues for designing ceramic components with enhanced functionalities. Direct ink writing [45] is a precise AM method that utilizes ceramic pastes as “inks”. This technique is particularly valuable in fabricating ceramic scaffolds for tissue engineering, ceramics with graded porosity, and components with optimized mechanical properties. Despite significant advancements in the 3D printing of ceramics, achieving industrial mass production continues to face challenges [46,47]: (1) the sintering and post-processing steps are critical but can lead to warping, shrinkage, and dimensional inaccuracies; (2) achieving a smooth surface finish on printed and sintered ceramics can be challenging due to material properties and printing processes; (3) larger ceramic components are rare due to material brittleness and low expansion coefficients. Thus, to expand 3D printing’s reach and achieve large-scale production of high-quality technical ceramic parts, focusing on material development and precise process control is crucial [48].
Ceramics are commonly produced in furnaces or kilns on a large scale. However, this traditional approach often results in substantial electricity consumption. Particularly in regions where electricity is primarily generated from fossil fuels, this means that ceramic manufacturing can contribute to significant air pollution due to the emissions associated with electricity generation [49]. In the worldwide drive toward sustainability and achieving a carbon-neutral society, advanced sintering techniques such as spark plasma sintering (SPS), field-assisted sintering techniques (FAST), flash sintering (FS), ultra-fast high-temperature sintering (UHS), and cold sintering (CS) have emerged as promising alternatives in ceramics manufacturing [50]. The SPS/FAST methods utilize electric fields and high pressures during the sintering process to aid the densification of ceramic powders [51]. These methods offer advantages such as reduced sintering time, lower energy consumption, and the ability to achieve fine-grained microstructures. The resulting ceramics exhibit enhanced mechanical properties and improved performance. FS is a rapid ceramic processing method in which, when a critical combination of electric field and temperature is reached, a power surge occurs, and the materials densify within seconds without the need for externally applied pressure [52]. This method offers energy savings and improved properties but requires further research for better understanding and control. The UHS method initially uses graphite felt heaters in direct contact with ceramic green bodies [53]. Due to the lack of a large furnace chamber and the low thermal mass of the setup, very high heating rates of several thousands of degrees per second can be achieved. CS is another novel approach that enables the sintering of ceramics at significantly lower temperatures than conventional methods [54]. By using a combination of pressure and a liquid solvent, CS reduces the energy required for densification, making it suitable for heat-sensitive materials and novel ceramic composites. However, most of these advanced sintering technologies are still under investigation, primarily at the laboratory scale. Transitioning sintering methods from the laboratory to actual fabrication demands a crucial criterion: the capability to produce fully sintered products, not just material samples. When applying these technologies industrially, meticulous assessment of microstructure uniformity across the entire component and relevant properties becomes essential. Moreover, the intricacy and expense of the necessary equipment, along with the feasibility of automating the processing steps, necessitate careful consideration [46].
In conclusion, within the realm of ceramic materials science and technology, embracing the transformative potential of advanced ceramics presents both opportunities and challenges. This journey towards sustainability is carving a path toward a more resilient future. The interplay of materials development, advanced manufacturing, and innovative applications is propelling ceramics into a new era.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.Y., Y.G. and H.Z.; investigation, Z.Y., Y.G. and H.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.Y.; writing—review and editing, Y.G. and H.Z.; funding acquisition, Z.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Z.Y. expresses gratitude for the support received from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 12172104), the Talent Recruitment Project of Guangdong (2021QN02L892), the Shccig-Qinling Program (SMYJY202300140C), Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (JCYJ20200109113439837) and Development and Reform Commission of Shenzhen (XMHT20220103004).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Chen, J.; Tong, B.; Lin, J.; Gao, X.; Cheng, J.; Zhang, S. Tailoring the chemical heterogeneity of Mn-modified 0.75BiFeO3-0.25BaTiO3 ceramics for piezoelectric sensor applications. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 42, 3857–3864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Xia, R.; Chen, J.; Liang, R.; Zhou, Z. The positive effect of A-site nonstoichiometry on the electrical properties of Sr2Nb2O7 ceramics for high temperature piezoelectric sensor application. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 22500–22508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, K.; Liu, F.; Zhang, W.; Dou, Z.; Ma, W.; Samart, C.; Takesue, N.; Tan, H.; Fan, P.; Ye, Z.; et al. Design and development of outstanding strain properties in NBT-based lead-free piezoelectric multilayer actuators by grain-orientation engineering. Acta Mater. 2023, 246, 118696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fan, P.; Liu, K.; Ma, W.; Tan, H.; Zhang, Q.; Zhang, L.; Zhou, C.; Salamon, D.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; et al. Progress and perspective of high strain NBT-based lead-free piezoceramics and multilayer actuators. J. Mater. 2020, 7, 508–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Kabakov, P.; Kim, T.; Cheng, Z.; Jiang, X.; Zhang, S. The Versatility of Piezoelectric Composites. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2023, 53, 165–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Lu, H.; Cui, H.; Lu, G.; Jiang, L.; Hensleigh, R.; Zeng, Y.; Rayes, A.; Panduranga, M.K.; Acharya, M.; Wang, Z.; et al. 3D Printing and processing of miniaturized transducers with near-pristine piezoelectric ceramics for localized cavitation. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 2418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sait, S.; Abbas, Y.; Boubenider, F. Estimation of thin metal sheets thickness using piezoelectric generated ultrasound. Appl. Acoust. 2015, 99, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jia, W.; Hou, Y.; Zheng, M.; Xu, Y.; Yu, X.; Zhu, M.; Yang, K.; Cheng, H.; Sun, S.; Xing, J. Superior temperature-stable dielectrics for MLCC s based on Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3-NaNbO3 system modified by CaZrO3. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2018, 101, 3468–3479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhang, W.; Yang, J.; Wang, F.; Chen, X.; Mao, H. Enhanced dielectric properties of La-doped 0.75 BaTiO3-0.25Bi(Mg0.5Ti0.5)O3 ceramics for X9R-MLCC application. Ceram. Int. 2012, 47, 4486–4492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shehbaz, M.; Du, C.; Zhou, D.; Xia, S.; Xu, Z. Recent progress in dielectric resonator antenna: Materials, designs, fabrications, and their performance. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2023, 10, 021303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jiang, Y.; Liu, H.; Xiu, Z.; Wu, G.; Mao, M.; Luo, X.; Liu, B.; Lu, Z.; Qi, Z.; Sun, D.; et al. Temperature-stable Y2.95Dy0.05MgAl3SiO12 garnet-type 5G millimeter-wave dielectric ceramic resonator antenna. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 35085–35091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mukherjee, B.; Patel, P.; Mukherjee, J. A review of the recent advances in dielectric resonator antennas. J. Electromagn. Waves Appl. 2020, 34, 1095–1158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, X.; Gao, X.; Zhang, Z.; Cheng, L.; Ma, H.; Yang, W. Advances in modifications and high-temperature applications of silicon carbide ceramic matrix composites in aerospace: A focused review. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2021, 41, 4671–4688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Shvydyuk, K.O.; Nunes-Pereira, J.; Rodrigues, F.F.; Silva, A.P. Review of Ceramic Composites in Aeronautics and Aerospace: A Multifunctional Approach for TPS, TBC and DBD Applications. Ceramics 2023, 6, 195–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Siengchin, S. A review on lightweight materials for defence applications: A present and future developments. Def. Technol. 2023, 24, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ni, D.; Cheng, Y.; Zhang, J.; Liu, J.-X.; Zou, J.; Chen, B.; Wu, H.; Li, H.; Dong, S.; Han, J.; et al. Advances in ultra-high temperature ceramics, composites, and coatings. J. Adv. Ceram. 2022, 11, 1–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhou, Q.; Su, X.; Wu, J.; Zhang, X.; Su, R.; Ma, L.; Sun, Q.; He, R. Additive Manufacturing of Bioceramic Implants for Restoration Bone Engineering: Technologies, Advances, and Future Perspectives. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2023, 9, 1164–1189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Dimitriadis, K.; Moschovas, D.; Agathopoulos, S. Microstructure and mechanical properties of zirconia stabilized with increasing Y2O3, for use in dental restorations. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2023, 20, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Raza, T.; Yang, J.; Wang, R.; Xia, C.; Raza, R.; Zhu, B.; Yun, S. Recent advance in physical description and material development for single component SOFC: A mini-review. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 444, 136533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Han, Y.; Chen, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Li, Z.; Wang, Y. Recent progress on garnet-type oxide electrolytes for all-solid-state lithium-ion batteries. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 29375–29390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Obada, D.O.; Salami, K.A.; Alabi, A.A.; Oyedeji, A.N.; Csaki, S.; Hulan, T.; Meher, A.K. Mechanical behaviour of porous kaolin-based ceramics for potential catalysts support applications. J. Korean Ceram. Soc. 2023, 60, 99–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Stein, Z.; Naraparaju, R.; Schulz, U.; Tetard, L.; Raghavan, S. Residual stress effects of CMAS infiltration in high temperature jet engine ceramic coatings captured non-destructively with confocal Raman-based 3D rendering. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 43, 1579–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Omerašević, M.; Kocjan, A.; Bučevac, D. Novel cordierite-acicular mullite composite for diesel particulate filters. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 2273–2280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Rani, S.L.S.; Kumar, R.V. Insights on applications of low-cost ceramic membranes in wastewater treatment: A mini-review. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2021, 4, 100149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Xu, H.; Yu, Y.; Wang, Z.; Shao, G. First principle material genome approach for all solid-state batteries. Energy Environ. Mater. 2019, 2, 234–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, J.; Xiang, X.; Xu, B.; Huang, S.; Xiong, Y.; Ma, S.; Fu, H.; Ma, Y.; Chen, H.; Wu, Z.; et al. Rational design of high-entropy ceramics based on machine learning—A critical review. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 2023, 27, 101057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Boubchir, M.; Aourag, H. Materials genome project: The application of principal component analysis to the formability of perovskites and inverse perovskites. Comput. Condens. Matter. 2020, 24, e00495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Liu, B.; Zhao, J.; Liu, Y.; Xi, J.; Li, Q.; Xiang, H.; Zhou, Y. Application of high-throughput first-principles calculations in ceramic innovation. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2021, 88, 143–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qin, J.; Liu, Z.; Ma, M.; Li, Y. Machine learning approaches for permittivity prediction and rational design of microwave dielectric ceramics. J. Mater. 2021, 7, 1284–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Nakayama, M. Materials informatics for discovery of ion conductive ceramics for batteries. J Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 2021, 129, 286–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yi, M.; Wang, W.; Xue, M.; Gong, Q.; Xu, B.-X. Modeling and Simulation of Sintering Process Across Scales. Arch. Computat. Methods Eng. 2023, 30, 3325–3358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yan, Z.; He, A.; Hara, S.; Shikazono, N. Modeling of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) electrodes from fabrication to operation: Correlations between microstructures and electrochemical performances. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 190, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Gu, W.; Yang, B.; Lia, D.; Shang, X.; Zhou, Z.; Guo, J. Accelerated design of lead-free high-performance piezoelectric ceramics with high accuracy via machine learning. J. Adv. Ceram. 2023, 12, 1389–1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liu, X.; Zhou, S.; Yan, Z.; Zhong, Z.; Shikazono, N.; Hara, S. Correlation between microstructures and macroscopic properties of nickel/yttria-stabilized zirconia (Ni-YSZ) anodes: Meso-scale modeling and deep learning with convolutional neural networks. Energy AI 2022, 7, 100122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Asheri, A.; Fathidoost, M.; Glavas, V.; Rezaei, S.; Xu, B.X. Data-driven multiscale simulation of solid-state batteries via machine learning. Comput. Mater. Sci. 2023, 226, 112186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wang, Y.; Wen, B.; Jiao, X.; Li, Y.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.; Dai, F.-Z. The highest melting point material: Searched by Bayesian global optimization with deep potential molecular dynamics. J. Adv. Ceram. 2023, 12, 803–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Niu, Z.; Zhao, W.; Wu, B.; Wang, H.; Lin, W.F.; Pinfield, V.J.; Xuan, J. π Learning: A Performance-Informed Framework for Microstructural Electrode Design. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2300244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Yan, Z.; He, A.; Hara, S.; Shikazono, N. Modeling of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) electrodes from fabrication to operation: Microstructure optimization via artificial neural networks and multi-objective genetic algorithms. Energy Convers. Manag. 2019, 198, 111916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Song, G.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, F.; Liu, F.; Gu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Li, Y. High-throughput synthesis and electrical properties of BNT-BT-KNN lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 3655–3662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Geng, X.; Tang, J.; Sheridan, B.; Sarkar, S.; Tong, J.; Xiao, H.; Li, D.; Bordia, R.K.; Peng, F. Ultra-Fast Laser Fabrication of Alumina Micro-Sample Array and High-Throughput Characterization of Microstructure and Hardness. Crystals 2021, 11, 890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Shuang, S.; Li, H.; He, G.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Meng, X. High-throughput automatic batching equipment for solid state ceramic powders. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 2019, 90, 083904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Lakhdar, Y.; Tuck, C.; Binner, J.; Terry, A.; Goodridge, R. Additive manufacturing of advanced ceramic materials. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2021, 116, 100736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Chen, H.Z.; Pan, Y.; Chen, B.; Li, J.; Gui, Z.; Chen, J.; Yan, H.; Zeng, Y.; Chen, J. Fabrication of porous aluminum ceramics beyond device resolution via stereolithography 3D printing. Ceram. Int. 2023, 49, 18463–18469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Du, W.; Ren, X.; Pei, Z.; Ma, C. Ceramic binder jetting additive manufacturing: A literature review on density. J. Manuf. Sci. Eng. 2020, 142, 040801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Shahzad, A.; Lazoglu, I. Direct ink writing (DIW) of structural and functional ceramics: Recent achievements and future challenges. Compos. B Eng. 2021, 225, 109249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mostafaei, A.; Elliott, A.M.; Barnes, J.E.; Li, F.; Tan, W.; Cramer, C.L.; Nandwana, P.; Chmielus, M. Binder jet 3D printing—Process parameters, materials, properties, modeling, and challenges. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2020, 119, 100707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Dadkhah, M.; Tulliani, J.M.; Saboori, A.; Iuliano, L. Additive Manufacturing of Ceramics: Advances, Challenges, and Outlook. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2023, 43, 6635–6664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Chen, Z.; Li, Z.; Li, J.; Liu, C.; Lao, C.; Fu, Y.; Liu, C.; Yang, L.; Wang, P.; Yi, H. 3D printing of ceramics: A review. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 39, 661–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ibn-Mohammed, T.; Randall, C.A.; Mustapha, K.B.; Guo, J.; Walker, J.; Berbano, S.S.; Koh, S.C.; Wang, D.; Sinclair, D.C.; Reaney, I.M. Decarbonising ceramic manufacturing: A techno-economic analysis of energy efficient sintering technologies in the functional materials sector. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2019, 39, 5213–5235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Guillon, O.; Rheinheimer, W.; Bram, M. A Perspective on Emerging and Future Sintering Technologies of Ceramic Materials. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2023, 25, 2201870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Guillon, O.; Gonzalez-Julian, J.; Dargatz, B.; Kessel, T.; Schierning, G.; Räthel, J.; Herrmann, M. Field-assisted sintering technology/spark plasma sintering: Mechanisms, materials, and technology developments. Adv. Eng. Mater. 2014, 6, 830–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Cologna, M.; Rashkova, B.; Raj, R. Flash Sintering of Nanograin Zirconia in <5 s at 850 °C. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 3556–3559. [Google Scholar]
  53. Wang, C.; Ping, W.; Bai, Q.; Cui, H.; Hensleigh, R.; Wang, R.; Brozena, A.H.; Xu, Z.; Dai, J.; Pei, Y.; et al. A general method to synthesize and sinter bulk ceramics in seconds. Science 2020, 368, 521–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Guo, J.; Floyd, R.; Lowum, S.; Maria, J.P.; Herisson de Beauvoir, T.; Seo, J.H.; Randall, C.A. Cold sintering: Progress, challenges, and future opportunities. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2019, 49, 275–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yan, Z.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, H. Materials Development and Potential Applications of Ceramics: New Opportunities and Challenges. Appl. Sci. 2023, 13, 10957. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131910957

AMA Style

Yan Z, Gao Y, Zhang H. Materials Development and Potential Applications of Ceramics: New Opportunities and Challenges. Applied Sciences. 2023; 13(19):10957. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131910957

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yan, Zilin, Yan Gao, and Haibo Zhang. 2023. "Materials Development and Potential Applications of Ceramics: New Opportunities and Challenges" Applied Sciences 13, no. 19: 10957. https://doi.org/10.3390/app131910957

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop