Next Article in Journal
Identification of Terahertz Link Modulation in Atmospheric Weather Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
Acute Effects of Mini Trampoline Training Session on Leg Stiffness and Reactive Power
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling and Optimization with Artificial Intelligence in Nutrition
Previous Article in Special Issue
One-Step Gait Pattern Analysis of Hip Osteoarthritis Patients Based on Dynamic Time Warping through Ground Reaction Force
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Loaded 5 Sit-to-Stand Test to Determine the Force–Velocity Relationship in Older Adults: A Validation Study

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(13), 7837; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137837
by Gianluca Bochicchio 1, Luca Ferrari 1,2, Alberto Bottari 1, Francesco Lucertini 2, Valentina Cavedon 1, Chiara Milanese 1 and Silvia Pogliaghi 1,3,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(13), 7837; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137837
Submission received: 12 June 2023 / Revised: 29 June 2023 / Accepted: 29 June 2023 / Published: 3 July 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applied Biomechanics and Motion Analysis)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The main aim of the study „Loaded 5 Sit-to-Stand test to determine the force-velocity relationship in older adults: a validation study“ is to investigate the feasibility and validity of the loaded 5STS test compared to the gold standard for the assessment of F0, V0, Pmax, and Vopt through the F-v profiling in older adults. The second aim was to investigate the relationship between F0 and Pmax, as measured with both loaded 5STS and gold standard approach, with clinical markers of muscle mass and strength.

 

The study is interesting. I would like to appretiate the efforts of the authors. However, some information is missing in the article, some facts need to be explained and add:

Line 105, 106, 109, 110: The methodological correct would be for participants to be randomly divided into two groups, each group should take the tests in reverse order. I recommend that you complete within the limits of work.

 

Line 132, 133: Has this test been used in this version before? If so, I recommend writing a citation.

 

Line 130, 131: Is 5 minutes of recovery enough for these participants?

 

 

Line 371, 372 (Table 2): I recommend to indicate significant results in the table.

 

Author Response

Please, see the attached documents for our answers

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The comments are in the text

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please, see the attached document for our answers

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop