Next Article in Journal
Investigation of a Precise Control Scheme for Rice Quality
Next Article in Special Issue
Calculation of Consistent Plasma Parameters for DEMO-FNS Using Ionic Transport Equations and Simulation of the Tritium Fuel Cycle
Previous Article in Journal
Experimental Study on Femtosecond Laser Processing Performance of Single-Crystal Silicon Carbide
Previous Article in Special Issue
Neutronic Activity for Development of the Promising Alternative Water-Cooled DEMO Concepts
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Activation Analyses of Disposal Options for Irradiated Be12Ti

Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(13), 7534; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137534
by Pavel Pereslavtsev 1,*, Pierre Cortes 2 and Joelle Elbez-Uzan 2
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3:
Appl. Sci. 2023, 13(13), 7534; https://doi.org/10.3390/app13137534
Submission received: 30 May 2023 / Revised: 20 June 2023 / Accepted: 20 June 2023 / Published: 26 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Fusion Engineering and Design)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

You presented a sound piece of scientific work providing the reader with comprehensive results relevant for radionuclide production. Except for two small issues, I strongly support the publication of your work.

Point 1: Please provide some additional details in section 2. You mention the differences and possible parameter flexibility, but you do not give detailed information on those. Please describe the parameters you chose for the calculations.

Point 2: in section 6, you discuss the (p,4n)-reaction on Se-80, however, you mistakenly name the same energy range as for the (p,2n)-process. Please check.

Author Response

The reviewer’s comments are confusing. There are no such discussions in the paper, that the reviewer is referring to. I think the comments were prepared for an another paper and they were occasionally copied. Therefore, no actions and no corrections were implemented.

Reviewer 2 Report

A very nice paper overall, thank you.

Authors state that "The main drawback of the HCPB blanket technology are very high capital expenses of this DEMO concept." In view of this and estimates given in the same paragraph for the future price of Be, in what dollar values are the prices given? In 2023 dollars, or in dollars projected to a future date? 2000$/kg seems to be a lot, but if this is in 2050 dollar values, it could be even less then 650$/kg in 2023 values. Can you please address this in the paper?

Author Response

In view of this and estimates given in the same paragraph for the future price of Be, in what dollar values are the prices given? In 2023 dollars, or in dollars projected to a future date? 2000$/kg seems to be a lot, but if this is in 2050 dollar values, it could be even less then 650$/kg in 2023 values. Can you please address this in the paper?

Answer: the following text is added:

Conservatively reasoning the future price for the Be12Ti industrial production for the DEMO needs could be estimated at least 1000¸2000 $/kg in dollar value in 30 years depending on the beryllium market evolution. 

Reviewer 3 Report

Please find some minor suggestions/comments to improve the quality of your manuscript.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

The corrections proposed were accepted and implemented in the text.

Back to TopTop