Environmental Risk Source Analysis and Classification of Zones: Subway Construction
, Yongkang Zhang 3, Liangfu Xie 1,2, Xin Meng 1 and Zheyi Guo 1Round 1
Reviewer 1 Report
It was with much interest that I read the article “Environmental Risk Source Analysis and Classification of Zones: Subway Construction”. The subject of the study is very pertinent and current in a time of constant urban changes and the increasing attention paid to the environmental implications of these interventions.
The manuscript complies with almost all the established norms for the articles of this publication. The article is well organized and the objectives are clear. However, please note the followings:
1. There is no theoretical background to support the study.
2. In point 2: what is the source of figure 1?
3. In point 3: from my point of view SBAS-In- 112 SAR technology should be clarified. Source of the figure 2?
4. The findings are not compared with the other eventual studies in the same thematic area.
5. In conclusion section: what are the practical applications of this study?
6. In my point of view the list of references should be improved.
Author Response
The authors thank the reviewer for the valuable and careful comments. All of the following comments have been addressed in the revised version of the manuscript. The revisions have been highlighted in red. Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: 
Author Response.docx
Reviewer 2 Report
Thanks for working a the prominent field of study
The road network utilized here is fine. Have you also searched and other available road networks for better results
What are the available high-rise building data utilized with accuracy?
Parameters utilized for Density risk level and distribution for the road network?
What are the data of the survey complete? Since this much large area i.e. 250,000 km2 with refined equipment survey is mandatory
Author Response
The authors thank the reviewer for the valuable and careful comments. All of the following comments have been addressed in the revised version of the manuscript. The revisions have been highlighted in red. Please see the attachment.
Author Response File: Author Response.docx
Round 2
Reviewer 1 Report
Thank you for submitting the revised version of your paper. I appreciate the work done by the authors and the changes introduced to the manuscript, which substantially improved it. Congratulations on that.
I just have a note: in the first time that appears POI (line 302) you should write it in extense, not after (line 307).
