Next Article in Journal
Improved ADRC-Based Autonomous Vehicle Path-Tracking Control Study Considering Lateral Stability
Previous Article in Journal
Study of Bag Grouting Pile Reinforcing Deep Soft-Soil Foundation with an Interlayer of Hard Materials on High-Speed Railway Ballast Track
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Applied Sciences
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/app12094663
Review Report
applsci-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
Review
Peer-Review Record

Legal, Economic and Cyber Security Framework Considerations for Drone Usage

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(9), 4663; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094663
by Mircea Constantin Șcheau 1,2, Monica Violeta Achim 3,*, Larisa Găbudeanu 4, Iulia Brici 5 and Alexandru-Lucian Vîlcea 6
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(9), 4663; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12094663
Submission received: 4 April 2022 / Revised: 1 May 2022 / Accepted: 3 May 2022 / Published: 6 May 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Mechanical Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The study is very interesting, relevant and contributes a novelty to digital economy area.


Was a similar review published recently and, if yes, is this current review still relevant and of interest to the scientific community?
The current review is still relevant and of interest to the scientific community.


Are the cited references current (mostly within the last 5 years)? Are any citations omitted? Does it include an abnormal number of self-citations?
The article cites current references.


Are the statements and conclusions drawn coherent and supported by the listed citations?
Yes, the statements and conclusions drawn coherent and supported by citations.


Are the figures/tables/images/schemes appropriate? Do they properly show the data? Are they easy to interpret and understand?
Yes, it is.

Additionally, I will not emphasize that it was a cost-benefit analysis conducted in this study - you presented only an introduction to this kind of analysis in the conclusion part.  I will rewrite the aim as follows: The aim of this paper is to investigate how the usage of drones fits in the context
of the digital economy. I will cancel the cost-benefits analysis from keywords.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

I appreciated your work.

It is the first one I ever read trying to give an objective point of view on user perceptions towards a technological revolution as widespreading of drones can be. I think such paper can be an effective tool also for helping the regulatory work. In my opinion, the latter is really behind, especially considering the possible impact that drone devices can have on safety of everyone. People opinions are important to clarify which regulatory aspects are lacking and how to address them, so because regulations shall be made "democratically" the study portrayed by this paper is of absolute interest.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop