Next Article in Journal
Long-Term Trend of the Levels of Ambient Air Pollutants of a Megacity and a Background Area in Korea
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Forefoot–Rearfoot and Pelvic–Scapular Weight Shifts on Lower-Limb and Lumbar Muscle Activity during Static Wall-Squat Exercises
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Identification of Friction Behavior Variation in the Minor Flank of Square Shoulder Milling Cutters under Vibration

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(8), 4038; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12084038
by Bin Jiang, Weiheng Li, Peiyi Zhao *, Lili Fan and Meng Sun
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(8), 4038; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12084038
Submission received: 5 March 2022 / Revised: 8 April 2022 / Accepted: 12 April 2022 / Published: 16 April 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The paper « Identification for Friction Behavior Variation of the Minor Flank of Square Shoulder Milling Cutter under Vibration » aims to reveal the relationship between machined surface quality, friction and tool wear condition. The works respond to a technological and scientific challenges for controlling the quality and integrity of surfaces after machining.

However, before the publication of the paper, some clarification is needed.

- a more detailed presentation of the experimental procedure is necessary to understand the work. (Test protocol, machine, sensors and measurements performed, ...)

- the treatment carried out on the experimental measurements for the validation of the various models must be presented, in particular the friction.

- Is the vibration measured during the tests?

- what are the software used for the implementation of the developed models ?

- are the friction coefficients and the evolution of wear measured? if yes, how?

- how are the images of figure 4 obtained ?

- The simulations of figure 6 must be detailed is explained in the text

- How does the wear of the milling tool modify the friction? Have the different phases of the wear evolution as a function of time been identified? Is this taken into account in the developed model?

- Please quote table 1 in the text,

- please correct the legend in figure 15

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear editor/author,

I specified my reviews about manuscript as below;

-What was the reason for choosing a three-edged cutting tool? Also, is the recommended system applicable to solide tools? Couldn't optimum test results be obtained by choosing Solide tools?

- The experment expression in Table 3 should be corrected.

-Figures for experimental and simulation should be edited as a and b in Fig.4. This is true for all figures.

- Was the test repeated for experimental and simulation results? Were the results obtained by performing a single experiment under the same conditions?

-What is the material used for the experiments? It would be better if figures of wear are given in comparative form.

Kind regards

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Manuscript can be accepted for publishing.

Kind regards.

Back to TopTop