Next Article in Journal
Creating a Haptic 3D Model of Wenceslas Hill in Olomouc
Previous Article in Journal
An Intelligent Access Channel Algorithm Based on Distributed Double Q Learning
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Modeling and Distribution Identification of Instantaneous Cutting Energy Efficiency of Milling Cutter under Vibration

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 10816; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110816
by Bin Jiang, Lili Fan, Peiyi Zhao *, Yufeng Song and Bin Wang
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 3:
Reviewer 4: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(21), 10816; https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110816
Submission received: 28 September 2022 / Revised: 21 October 2022 / Accepted: 21 October 2022 / Published: 25 October 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Please see the attached PDF file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Hello, I have attached the review of the paper applsci-1968587-peer-review-v1. Thank you. Sincerely,

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper deals with the Modelling and distribution identifying of instantaneous cut-

ting energy efficiency of milling cutter under vibration. 

According to the reviewer, the paper is worth publishing at Applied Sciences Journal, 

but some corrections are needed and then the paper can be accepted for publication in the journal.

 Additionally make the following corrections to the manuscript:

 

Comment 1

The authors must insert Nomenclature.

 

Comment 2

The authors should delete the Lines 9 - 10.

 

Comment 3

Line 61

Płodzień et al. used... [13, 14].

The authors must replace

Płodzień et al. did not the authors for [14] ...

 

Line 63

Luan et al. proposed ....[15, 16].

Luan et al. did not the authors for [16].

 

Line 66

Zhang et al. considered ... [17, 18].

Zhang et al. did not the authors for [18].

 

Line 68

Zhang et al. es- .... [19-21].

Zhang et al. did not the authors for [20-21].

 

Line 71

Zhu et al. proposed .... [22-24].

Zhu et al. did not the authors for [23-24]. 

 

Comment 4

Exteded text editing.

 

Line 149

of the feed system. and

The authors must replace

of the feed system and

 

Comment 5

The authors must give more details for the machine tool (diameter, type).

 

Comment 6

The authors must give more details for the Table 1 and 3 (how the values caltulated).

 

Comment 7

Line 301

The authors must explain the values (5.6, 8.3, 5).

 

Figure 10

The authors use the symbol a) two times.

The authors must replace.

 

Figure 8b

The authors must use only the English language (title).

 

Comment 8

The authors must give more details for FEM simulation (number of elements, minimum size,...)

Line 332

According to Figure 12 and Equations (34) ~ (35),

The authors must explain with more details.

 

Comment 9

Line 503

The authors must give more details for the white light interferometer (type, model).

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 4 Report

In this paper, the correlation model of the instantaneous cutting energy efficiency with milling cutter and its cutter teeth was established. Using the cutting energy efficiency and the specific cutting energy and its distribution on the cutting edge of cutter tooth, the dynamic relationship between effective cutting energy transfer and conversion of milling cutter was characterized. The authors cover a very interesting topic. Following comments/suggestion must be given due attention.

1)     It is suggested to provide a brief explanation of some terminologies introduced in the introduction section such as, intermittent cutting process, instantaneous cutting energy consumption, distributive variation, cutting tooth error, distribution function, and tangential force energy consumption.

2)     It is suggested to rewrite the statements made in the early part of introduction section with more clarity, e.g,

(i)              Line 29-31: "In the high-efficiency and intermittent cutting process of a milling cutter, due to the changing cutting load, the input energy and the output energy of the milling cutter is an unstable".

(ii)            Line 36-38: "The instantaneous multi-tooth cutting model of milling cutter determines that the instantaneous energy efficiency of milling cutter is composed of the instantaneous energy efficiency of each cutter tooth involved in cutting".

(iii)          Line 42-44: "Meanwhile, the instantaneous cutting behavior of the cutter teeth is in an unstable in the workpiece coordinate system under milling vibration and cutter tooth error".

3)     It is recommended to avoid the compounding of references.

4)     Literature review lacks critical discussion of the previous studies. It is recommended to extend the literature review by adding more recent studies.

5)     One of the known causes of nonlinearity in milling process is the tool runout and cycloid path of cutting edge. It is suggested to provide some discussion on the effect of cutting parameters on the energy consumption in the nonlinear process.

6)     It is recommended to add the motivation of the current study in terms of the shortcoming in the literature on the instantaneous cutting energy efficiency and specific cutting energy of cutter tooth.

7)     Organization of the manuscript should be added at the end of introduction section.

8)     Fig. 1 presenting the instantaneous cutting posture and energy of milling cutter under vibration seems crowded. It would be good for the sake of readers understanding, if Fig. 1 is modified by removing the redundant information. Same is true for Figs. 3 & 4.

9)     Is the proposed model can be implemented on all the milling operations or it is valid only for a specific milling operation?

10) How does the instantaneous shear energy, equation (18) is derived?

11) It is suggested to add the accuracy and validity of the parameters measured in the conducted experiment.

12) Quality of Figs. 6-11 are very poor. Axis labels, legends and text is not clear.

13) In my opinion, number of figures (31) presented in the manuscript is high for a standard journal article.  

14) It is suggested to add the reasons for selecting the simulation parameters to the manuscript. 

15) Assumptions used in the modeling needs to be clearly defined.

16) The limitations of the research and future developments need to be better explained in the conclusions.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have addressed the comments satisfactorily.

Author Response

 Thank you very much for your affirmation and approval to our article.

Reviewer 4 Report

I am satisfied with the revision made by the authors. Therefore, I would like to recommend it for publication in its current form.

Author Response

 Thank you very much for your affirmation and approval to our article.

Back to TopTop