Next Article in Journal
Pedestrians’ Microscopic Walking Dynamics in Single-File Movement: The Influence of Gender
Next Article in Special Issue
Green Care Achievement Based on Aquaponics Combined with Human–Computer Interaction
Previous Article in Journal
Quantitative Comparison of Tree Ensemble Learning Methods for Perfume Identification Using a Portable Electronic Nose
Previous Article in Special Issue
Breast Geometry Characterization of Young American Females Using 3D Image Analysis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

FAECCD-CNet: Fast Automotive Engine Components Crack Detection and Classification Using ConvNet on Images

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(19), 9713; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199713
by Michael Abebe Berwo, Yong Fang *, Jabar Mahmood, Nan Yang, Zhijie Liu and Yimeng Li
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(19), 9713; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12199713
Submission received: 8 August 2022 / Revised: 16 September 2022 / Accepted: 19 September 2022 / Published: 27 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Intelligence in Image and Video Analysis)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

In the paper Authors propose new methodology for automotive component cracking inspection based on ConvNet models instead of manual inspection/detection.

Nice paper, but difficult to read due to huge amount of abbreviations. My first suggestion was to add abbreviation dictionary at the beginning of the paper. Then I found it at the end…in my opinion should be at the beginning and involve much more abbreviations, e.g. used in abstract and later DA? What it means - decision altitude (DA)? I think there is more unclear abbreviations.

Pic’s with diagrams are not fully readable, maybe different font type will help.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The work is well written and organized. The bibliography is up to date and the results are widely described, represented and commented on.

 

Below, by points, some changes to increase readability and quality of work:

·         Avoid triumphant adjectives like 'outstanding' and the like.

·         Standardize all figures and increase both quality and shape.

·         Move figure 8 to the paragraph describing it. In addition, with regard to Figures 8 and 9, on the axes, there is no description of the quantities and their units of measurement.

 

·         The data reported in the 'Results' section should be accompanied, where possible, by relative graphs highlighting, in a more effective and understandable way, the performance of the approaches used.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop