Next Article in Journal
Research on De-Noising Method of Grounded Electrical Source Airborne Transient Electromagnetic Data Based on Singular Spectrum Analysis
Next Article in Special Issue
Time Series Forecasting Performance of the Novel Deep Learning Algorithms on Stack Overflow Website Data
Previous Article in Journal
Clinical Outcomes of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty among Different Etiologies and Treated with a Condylar Constrained Knee Implant Supported with Cones
Previous Article in Special Issue
Evaluation and Recognition of Handwritten Chinese Characters Based on Similarities
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Shooting Prediction Based on Vision Sensors and Trajectory Learning

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(19), 10115; https://doi.org/10.3390/app121910115
by Yuliang Zhao 1,2, Xinyue Zhang 1, Mingliang Yang 3, Qingchao Zhang 4, Jian Li 1, Chao Lian 1,*, Changbo Bi 1, Zhiping Wang 1 and Guanglie Zhang 5,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(19), 10115; https://doi.org/10.3390/app121910115
Submission received: 4 September 2022 / Revised: 29 September 2022 / Accepted: 5 October 2022 / Published: 8 October 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Authors tried to use vision for prediction of success in basketball shooting. Movement of ball is in three dimensional area, My concern is that, How two dimensional vision can give us 90% accuracy when we do not have information of third dimesion? Other concern is that, how prediction of trajectory after shooting can help the player to improve his/her prformance?
I propose that aim of research needs modification. Better prediction needs at least view from two different points.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper is interesting, however, some issue should be corrected

a. In the introduction part, authors should give some simple discussions to show the advantages and disadvantages of the existing results.

b. Please add organized of paper in the end of introduction

c. The authors have to further improve the technical writing and presentation of the paper.

d. Please add refs for equation

e. Fig 7, Fig 8, Fig 9 are low quality, please not printscreen, author can drawn using software. I suggest author drawn with one graphic for comparative

f. please give more discussion for section 5. Compare with simlliar studies, limitation of this study etc 

g.  Throughout the manuscript grammatical errors and typos should be thoroughly checked

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Respected Authors

 

Figure 5 needs modification. When we have two dimensional analysis, it is better that position of the camera be accurately in center of distance between player and basket. But in figure 5, it seems more close to player.
Figure 6 has two subfigures. It will be better that they labeled separately.
In left figure, Authors can show time via other method instead of the third axis. 
It worth to be mentioned that in the paper will be emphasized that research is two-dimensional analysis.

Back to TopTop