Next Article in Journal
From Word Embeddings to Pre-Trained Language Models: A State-of-the-Art Walkthrough
Next Article in Special Issue
Factors Influencing Student Satisfaction toward STEM Education: Exploratory Study Using Structural Equation Modeling
Previous Article in Journal
Can Isotopes Be Used as Lead Tracers in Shooting-Range Soils?
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Systematic Review on Design Thinking Integrated Learning in K-12 Education
 
 
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Educational Case Studies for Pilot Engineer 4.0 Programme: Monitoring and Control of Discrete-Event Systems Using OPC UA and Cloud Applications

Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Information Technology, Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, 812 19 Bratislava, Slovakia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(17), 8802; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178802
Received: 30 July 2022 / Revised: 28 August 2022 / Accepted: 30 August 2022 / Published: 1 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue STEAM Education and the Innovative Pedagogies in the Intelligence Era)

Abstract

:
The current trend in industry is the digitalisation of production processes using modern information and communication technologies, a trend that falls under the fourth industrial revolution, Industry 4.0. Applications that link the world of information technologies (IT) and operational technologies (OT) are in particular demand. On the basis of information from practice, it can be stated that there is a shortage of specialists in the labour market for the interconnection of PLCs with information and communication technologies (cloud, web, mobile applications, etc.) in Slovakia and neighbouring countries. However, this problem is beginning to affect other countries in Europe as well. The main objective of the work was to prepare case studies suitable for educational purposes, which would address the modelling and control of a virtual discrete-event system using a PLC program and its subsequent interfacing to a cloud application. Within the scope of the work, three case studies were prepared to demonstrate the control of discrete-event system using different programming systems and their communication with the developed cloud applications. These applications are to be used for data monitoring and emergency intervention of the discrete-event system. The characteristics of the prepared case studies, which combine operational and informational technologies, predestines them for use in the sphere of education of engineers for digitalisation of production processes. They can also be helpful in research on the creation of digital twins, which represent a type of symmetry between real and virtual systems.

1. Introduction

The digitalisation of production systems with the help of modern information and communication technologies is one of the trends of our time. These technologies are becoming indispensable tools for the necessary digital transformation of industrial processes. They can strengthen the performance of a company, optimise available capacities and improve the quality of final products. Recently, the merging or convergence of information and operational technologies has begun to be mentioned, a trend linked to the Fourth Industrial Revolution, which brought about the concept of Industry 4.0 [1].
To teach interdisciplinary knowledge in study programmes focused on applied and engineering informatics, it is necessary to update the curricula [2]. Educating engineers for digitised production for a world that requires new, multifunctional professions is not an easy task. It is therefore necessary to prepare new educational materials also in cooperation with practice [3].
PLCs (Programmable Logic Controllers) are an important control element in manufacturing systems and there are many specialists on the market who can interface and program such industrial computers. However, very few of them know how to connect PLCs to the IT world (e.g., cloud, augmented reality, mobile or web applications, etc.). Therefore, in this paper, we will deal with interfacing a PLC with a cloud solution and implementing a service application. This paper and project responds to the demand of practice and consists of three case studies that will be used for the development of educational modules for engineers for Industry 4.0.

2. Background

The presented topic is closely related to the convergence of information and operational technologies.
Information technology is an integral part of our times. It make work easier and save time for us people in today’s world in several fields of work such as education, healthcare, transport and others. That is why information technology is constantly advancing. Thus, by information technology (IT), we can imagine that it deals with computer technology including hardware, software, telecommunications and generally anything related to the transmission of information or systems that facilitate communication [4].
Operational technologies, as opposed to information technologies, focus on the control and diagnostics of physical devices. The term operational technology (OT) is hardware and software that detects or causes change through direct monitoring and/or control of industrial equipment, assets, processes and events [5].
Very briefly, it could be said that the basic difference between information technology and operational technology is that information technology deals with information and is often associated with software, and operational technology deals with machines and is often associated with hardware. Until recently, these technologies worked separately, but the Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) has changed a lot of things and blurred the imaginary line between where IT ends and OT begins. Complex machines have begun to integrate with network elements and are driven by advanced analytics software [6].
The idea of the convergence of IT and OT (Figure 1) is not new, but the concept is only now beginning to be put into practice. With the advent of new technologies, we can generally improve efficiency, reduce errors and costs, but also improve workflows and gain competitive advantages. In short, we would say that we are trying to bring physical technology into the digital realm. We are able to do this thanks to advances in, for example, machine-to-machine communication, as well as the introduction of sophisticated sensors and IoT elements that can be mounted on physical devices. These devices can use wireless communication over standardised network protocols to communicate relevant data from each physical system back to a central server for monitoring and analysis. The results of this analysis can then be relayed back to the physical system to enable more autonomous operation, increase accuracy, improve maintenance and improve uptime [4]. So the question certainly arises as to why convergence between IT and OT is important. There are of course a number of reasons, whether it is the aforementioned blurring of the imaginary line between IT and OT or creating a strategy that will improve operational performance. The convergence of IT and OT is a prerequisite for the development of cyber-physical systems, which are a pillar of the Industry 4.0 concept [6]. One of the important concepts for Industry 4.0 brought about by the convergence of IT and OT is the digital twin. The digital twin represents a kind of symmetry between the real system and its virtual model. New technology areas such as Industrial Internet of Things (IIoT) and the Internet of Services (IoS) are also closely linked to convergence of IT and OT.

3. Related Works

In this section, we will address the need to educate the next generation of engineering experts, of which there is still a shortage.

3.1. Urge for Education of Industry 4.0 Technologies

Research and computer laboratories need to be updated in engineering programs to teach interdisciplinary knowledge. The process must include both complex modules and elements from the outside world. This trend in teaching methods is evident in the use of individual HW and SW modules for modelling, testing, and the creation of optimal production lines, cognitive robots, communication systems, and virtual reality models to demonstrate the functionality of individual processes as well as to assess process reconfiguration and the effect of smart features and embedded control systems on the design of production processes [7].
Universities emphasise their role as testbeds of innovation and teachers of the next generation of technologists. The current levels of industrial development and technical advancement are greatly influenced by traditional education. However, it is crucial to take into account how Industry 4.0 will affect higher education institutions if higher education is to impart the necessary skills and knowledge to future generations. As a result, integrating Industry 4.0 concepts into engineering curricula is one of the top concerns for universities and other academic institutions [8].
Given the prevalence of cyber-physical systems, the inclusion of sensors in nearly all industrial components and machinery, and the analysis of all significant data [9], Engineering 4.0 education should concentrate on developing the skills necessary for the digitalisation of the manufacturing sector [10]. Industry 4.0 calls for the development of new, multifaceted professions [11]. These new professionals will need to increase their knowledge of information technology and the procedures that must and should be followed in order to implement it. The report “High-tech skills and leadership for Europe” estimates that there was a shortage of 500,000 IT professionals in Europe by 2020 [12].
The importance of artificial intelligence and computer vision has increased recently due to their contributions to intelligent manufacturing systems [13].
Due to technological advancements and the realisations of Industry 4.0, smart factories require a high degree of precision and accuracy in the measurements and inspection of industrial gears. Machine vision technology enables image-based inspection and analysis for such demanding applications. The level of human expertise in computer vision is rising quickly. Due to the comprehensiveness of image information, visual sensors—unlike other types of sensors—can theoretically span the entire amount of information needed for autonomous driving, the recording of traffic violations, numerous medical tasks, and so forth. The need for experts in computer vision is growing every day. It is crucial to teach experts in various application domains the fundamentals of computer vision at the same time [14].

3.2. Training Programmes for Industry 4.0 and Education 4.0 Concept

In the context of the information presented in the previous subsection, the requirement for specialised training of engineers for the introduction of innovations within the Industry 4.0 concept has arisen in several countries.
The majority of the industry is developing at an incredibly fast rate thanks to Industry 4.0. The education sector has been driven to the Education 4.0 revolution in order to keep up with the industries. The use of automated processes has caused education to shift away from traditional teaching methods and toward a more contemporary model, leading to co-relational research with business that has the potential to alter the entire paradigm of education. It is necessary to evaluate and put into practice the technological developments of this era. The paper compares the revolutions that were led in the fields of industry and education by explaining the ideas of Education 4.0 alongside the study of Industry 4.0 [15,16].
In order to achieve a high degree of production flexibility (individualised mass production), higher productivity rates through real-time monitoring and diagnosis, and a lower rate of material wastage in production, Industry 4.0 was originally a future vision described in the high-tech strategy of the German government. It is conceived upon information and communication technologies such as cyber-physical systems, Internet of Things, Physical Internet, and Internet of Services. The authors of this work present a road map with three pillars that outlines the improvements/changes that will be made to the curriculum development, lab concept, and student club activities. They discuss how they used this road map at the Turkish German University in Istanbul as well [17].
How the business or industry operates and develops has been completely altered by the emergence of Industry 4.0. Its expanding emphasis on automation, decentralisation, system integration, cyber-physical systems, etc., can be attributed to this. The staff is expected to develop computational, cognitive, and adaptive thinking abilities, primarily in the field of information technology, data analytics, etc. The result of this study made in Saudi Arabia is an outcome that the universities that created the foundation for societal trends or future talents must adapt and update their current programs, facilities, and infrastructure. There are opportunities and challenges associated with this transformation of higher education in line with the Industry 4.0 vision. Of course, there are many variables at play, and it takes a fair evaluation to strategically plan this transformation. This research examined the transition from traditional universities to Universities 4.0 and identified the difficulties that lie ahead. There are risks and opportunities associated with the modernisation of higher education in line with the concept of Industry 4.0. SWOT-AHP methodology was subsequently used in this study to analyse this transformation and investigate its likely effects. The importance of practical knowledge and exposure to digital technologies at the university level is highlighted by this study [18].
Due to the requirements for implementing the Industry 4.0 concept, employers will need to hire people with new skills and abilities, particularly in the digital realm. All types of schools, including nontechnical ones, need to change their teaching and educational methods, and rather than narrowly specialising in one area, education should focus on a much broader overview. People also need to be educated in systemic and interdisciplinary thinking at all types of schools. The study’s primary objective is to pinpoint areas where educational content should be concentrated in the future in light of Industry 4.0. A questionnaire survey was carried out in Slovak businesses as one of the research methods. According to the research findings, changes in workforce qualification structures related to the implementation of the Industry 4.0 concept should have a positive impact on boosting companies’ competitiveness and boosting production effectiveness. Based on the findings, it is suggested that the anticipated positive changes be implemented as structural changes within the Slovak educational system and the enforcement of vocational training in businesses [19].
Ingenjör4.0, a Swedish initiative, is a noteworthy educational project. It is a cutting-edge, web-based upskilling program that 13 Swedish universities collaborated to create. The modules can be mixed and matched by the participant, making it simple to tailor the upskilling to the particular requirements of the company and the individual. For business professionals, Ingenjör4.0 offers a singular, cutting-edge, extensive, and lifelong learning experience. It is targeted at professionals with engineering backgrounds as well as other professionals with an interest in connected and smart production, including operators, technicians, and management [20].
It was the Swedish initiative Ingenjör4.0 that started the discussion at our university on the possibility of implementing a similar programme in Slovakia.

3.3. State-of-the-Art Summary and Task Definition

Today’s industry requires professionals in many academic and practical fields. Educational institutions and universities are required by practice to incorporate new Industry 4.0 trends and methods into the current curriculum. This will ensure that future graduates are not caught off guard by changing expectations in the industry. Cyber-physical systems are just one of many major agents of change in the education of engineers and technical professionals.
Education in the field of automation (operational technologies) and in the field of computer science (information technologies) was until recently, and often still is, carried out strictly separately and in different study programmes. However, the convergence of IT and OT described in the previous section of the paper brings about the necessity of new perspectives on the curriculum, whereby knowledge in the fields of ICT, automatic control and mechatronics must be synergistically combined.
Therefore, the presented work deals with the creation of case studies usable for teaching experts for the field of digitalisation of manufacturing processes with emphasis on modern forms of communication in manufacturing systems (from the field level to the cloud) using virtual lines, softPLC and freely available platforms for IIoT (e.g., Node-RED [21]).

4. Basic Theory

This section introduces the basic theoretical aspects and software tools that are used in educational case studies in this article.
Since the studies deal with the control of systems, an environment for running the control system is needed. An industrial computer that has been ruggedised and adapted for the control of manufacturing processes, such as assembly lines, machines, robotic devices, or any activity that requires high reliability, ease of programming, and process fault diagnosis is known as a programmable logic controller (PLC) or programmable controller. Any industry-PC can be turned into an automation system by a PLC runtime system, also known as a runtime system, which allows you to cyclically automate and control technical operations, process sequences, and similar procedures [22].
Node-RED, which is based on flow-based programming, is used in the studies. According to the flow-based programming paradigm, applications are networks of “black box” processes that communicate by passing messages across predefined connections, where the connections are determined externally to the processes. Without requiring internal modification, these “black box” processes can be connected in an infinite number of ways to create various applications. Therefore, flow-based programming is by nature component-oriented. Node-RED is a programming tool for tying new and intriguing connections between hardware components, APIs, and online services. By offering a browser-based flow editor, Node-RED makes it simple to connect flows using the variety of nodes available in the palette. Then, flows can be instantly deployed to the runtime. The event-driven, non-blocking model of Node.js, on which the lightweight runtime is based, is fully utilised. Because of this, it can run both in the cloud and at the network’s edge on inexpensive hardware such as the Raspberry Pi [23].
The on-demand availability of computer system resources, particularly data storage (cloud storage) and processing power, without direct active management by the user is known as cloud computing. Functions in large clouds are frequently dispersed among several locations, each of which is a data centre. Cloud computing relies on resource sharing to achieve coherence and typically uses a “pay-as-you-go” model, which can reduce capital expenses but also result in unexpected operating expenses for users who are not aware of them [24].

5. Research Methods

The article deals with the problem of modelling, simulation and control of a discrete-event system. A controlled discrete-event system in real practice consists, for example, of a series of production lines. In a school environment for educational purposes, various physical models (e.g., from Fischertechnik [25] or LEGO [26]) are used. Virtual discrete-event systems are also a suitable alternative, which can be implemented using, for example, Factory I/O [27], and this application is used in the present work.
The use of a virtual/simulated discrete-event system brings several advantages. Since the output of the project is in the form of case studies usable for the field of education of professionals in the field of applied and engineering informatics, it was necessary to ensure that such materials are easily accessible to those interested. The virtual model does not need to be purchased, serviced and does not occupy any physical space, and thus can be offered to a wider group of interested parties.
In order to control the virtual system, we need a control system. In the case of discrete-event systems, which manufacturing systems inherently are, programmable logic controllers (PLCs), which are small computers that have input/output pins, are used. We can plug in appropriate sensors or actuators (e.g., controlled drives). We can also simulate the PLC operation on a computer (softPLC), so it is not necessary to own a real hardware PLC to run the created case studies, which is again very advantageous for educational purposes. PLC runtime is implemented by the PLC runtime engine, which is mostly a standard part of PLC editors, such as Siemens TIA Portal, CODESYS or OpenPLC. We can connect PLC runtime and Factory I/O using a communication protocol.

6. Educational Case Studies

This section contains a description of realised case studies.

6.1. Case Study No. 1: OpenPLC Linked with Node-RED and Microsoft Azure

In the first case study (Figure 2), we would like to demonstrate the use of the freely available open-source application system OpenPLC [28] instead of the traditional paid PLC editors and runtimes. However, OpenPLC does not support the modern communication standard OPC UA [29], but only the conventional Modbus protocol. Although OpenPLC can communicate with Factory I/O using this protocol and implement control processes using it, we also want to send data to the cloud and possibly provide it to other clients via OPC UA. Therefore, we need a Node-RED intermediary (middleware), which is not needed for control, but we also have it there for sharing data to the cloud via MQTT and also via an OPC UA server to which we can connect a wide variety of clients. In our case, we will be testing the OPC UA client UAExpert.

6.1.1. Discrete-Event System Specification and Behaviour

Discrete-event system could generally be defined as a system that can take on multiple states, with transitions between states being event-driven. In this case, we consider a virtual model of a discrete-event system in the form of a manufacturing system consisting of a production belt and a machining centre (Figure 3).
The model consists of several parts that should dynamically respond to events that occur in the system. At the input (emitter), pieces of material (semi-finished products) are generated at certain time intervals and need to be transported to the machining centre. Here, they are transformed by the machining process into products ready for dispatch to customers. The material and products are moved by conveyor belts. We have six of them (C1–C6). Seven retro-reflective sensors (R1–R7) ensure the functionality of the conveyors. Using the emitter, we send the material onto the belt, where it is detected by the sensor R1 and then the belt C1 is started. When the product is detected by sensor R3, the corner belt C2 is triggered and then the belt C3, which takes the material to the machining centre. Here it is processed into the final product, which is passed on to belt C4, which is triggered when sensor R5 detects it. Subsequently, sensor R6 starts belts C5 and C6. The final product is recorded by sensor R7, which should also provide a count of the number of finished products. It is advisable to use an aligner to ensure that the product enters the machining centre correctly. It is also necessary to ensure that there are no collisions between pieces of material in the system and also between finished products.
Figure 4 shows an overall view of the virtual model of the production line.
To create the above production line at Factory I/O, we needed a number of parts. They will be listed in the following paragraphs.
  • Belt conveyor (Figure 5)—used for transporting light loads. They are available in lengths of 2, 4 and 6 m and in analogue (we can adjust the speed of the conveyor) and digital versions;
  • Curved belt conveyor—used for transporting light loads and available in analogue and digital versions;
  • Aligners—metal structures that are attached to the conveyor to prevent the product from falling during transport. There are four types;
  • Chute conveyor—mostly used for dispatching items from conveyor belts;
  • Raw Material—metal or plastic material for the manufacturing of lids or bases. In our case we understand it as a semi-finished product that needs to be machined into a finished product;
  • Retroreflective Sensor and Reflector (Figure 6)—the sensor is used together with the reflector, it detects the presence of an object on the belt.
  • Emitter (Figure 7)—it is the entry point of the production line, which ensures the supply of production parts/raw materials to it. Raw materials are automatically generated at time intervals according to the emitter settings.
  • Remover (Figure 8)—removes one or more items from the scene.
  • Machining Center—a robot used for the production of pedestals.

6.1.2. Control of Discrete-Event System

In order to control the discrete-event system, we use the open-source OpenPLC editor and runtime in this case study. In OpenPLC, we use the Ladder logic. It is necessary to define the variables that are required for the creation of the control program. The variables will also be sent to the cloud later.
We use global RetroreflectiveSensor variables from 1 to 7 to sense the product on the belt, based on which we turn the belt on or off, or count the number of semi-products or products. The product values and subsequent calculations are handled through global variables Result1 to 3. Result1 counts how many semi-finished products have been dropped on the belt. Result2 expresses how many finished end products there are and Result3 expresses how many products are currently in production. For running the production conveyor belts, we use Conveyor variables 1 to 6. We also use various timers and mathematical functions. We use timers to ensure that there are no collisions. And with sensors we also count the time of the products on the belt to avoid further collisions again.

6.1.3. Communication between OpenPLC Runtime and Node-RED Middleware

The communication takes place first between OpenPLC and Factory I/O (Figure 9). The communication is provided using the Modbus protocol because OpenPLC does not support more modern protocols (e.g., OPC UA). In this case, OpenPLC behaves as a Modbus server and Factory I/O behaves as a Modbus client. Since we want to send the data to the cloud or provide it to other clients using the OPC UA server, we need an intermediary in the form of Node-RED. Thus, Node-RED is not needed for production control itself, but we use it for the possibility of sharing data for the OPC UA server and to the cloud. We communicate from Node-RED to Microsoft Azure cloud and back using the MQTT communication protocol.
In order to properly connect the OpenPLC runtime with Node-RED, it is necessary to understand how the Modbus protocol works and what is a server and what is a client in our case. OpenPLC can even work as a server and a client at the same time, which we will not actively use. Modbus offers four types of transmitted data.
  • Discrete Input—A single bit (BOOL) that is used for binary input (e.g., from sensors). In our case, these are addresses of type %IX. It can only be written by the Modbus server;
  • Coil—A single bit (BOOL), which is mostly used for binary output. In our case it is addresses of type %QX. It can be written not only by the server but also by the client;
  • Input Register—A 16-bit read-only register. It is kind of like Discrete Input, except it is not BOOL, but it is a 16-bit INT that can be unsigned or signed;
  • Holding Register—A 16-bit register designed for both read and write. It is kind of like Coil, except it is not a BOOL, but it is a 16-bit INT that can be unsigned or signed.
As mentioned, OpenPLC can act as both a Modbus client and a Modbus server. In these modes it works simultaneously, but a different address is reserved for each. For the OpenPLC server mode we are using, it has the following addresses (see Table 1).
Next, you need to set the Factory I/O on the Modbus client. We set the localhost where we are running OpenPLC, which is 127.0.0.1. Next, we need to set the digital inputs to be used on Coils. It would be more logical to use Inputs, but since Modbus client can only write to Coils, we have to use Coils for the inputs. And last we need to set up I/O Points and there we set the inputs and outputs according to how much space we need.
In Factory I/O, the input and output variables need to be assigned correctly to the Factory I/O components (Figure 10). The addresses must be identical to those in OpenPLC.
The control program from OpenPLC editor needs to be loaded into OpenPLC runtime and run. Figure 11 shows how values are read from the OpenPLC runtime and how OpenPLC connects to Node-RED using Modbus protocol. The ability to communicate via Modbus can be obtained by installing the node-red-contrib-modbus 5.14.1 library.
We read inputs (from sensors) via the node called Modbus Read-%QX0.0-7 and read outputs (actuators) via Modbus Read- %QX0.7+ node. We start with inputs from address 0, i.e., %QX0.0. The outputs start from address %QX1.0. The Modbus node always reads a whole byte, which is alright in this case since we have exactly eight input variables. The variables are of type BOOL (true/false). Modbus Read works as a client and we need to connect it to the server. We will connect it to a server that we have called OpenPLC local and set the corresponding address 127.0.0.1 and port 502. Next, it is needed to specify that we are going to read coils, which is a standard Modbus protocol command (FC1: Read Coil Status). In the case of our input variables, we set the address to 0, since we are reading from %QX0.0 (so in the case of %QX1.0, it would be 8). We set the quantity to 1, since we are reading 1 byte. We set the poll rate to 2 s, which means that the value is read every 2 s.
We used a similar procedure on Modbus Read- %QX0.7+, where we read output variables from PLC address %QX1.0 and our Modbus address is 8.
In PLC program there are also 3 values of INT type, which are stored in registers that have different addresses than the coils (these are of BOOL type). These are, for example, the number of finalised products. These values are read using the Modbus Read Holding node.

6.1.4. OPC UA Server and Client

Since we want to offer the values from the production line to other users who may have OPC UA clients, it was necessary to implement an OPC UA server in Node-RED to provide these data.
As already mentioned, OpenPLC runtime cannot function as an OPC UA server, as it is a free open-source tool. This is the domain of more advanced PLC solutions such as CODESYS or Siemens TIA Portal. Therefore, the OPC UA server will be created using Node-RED, to which the data arrive from OpenPLC runtime via Modbus protocol.
Library node-red-contrib-opcua 0.2.256 was used to create OPC UA server.
To create a server, it is necessary to use the OPC UA server node, where the port (in our case 53,880) and optionally its name are set. We use the default name. It is also possible to set authentication options, as OPC UA communication standard supports multiple security profiles. We use anonymous access for clarity (and since we are running on localhost).
The creation of the server is also related to the creation of address space, i.e., variables that will initially be empty or have a predefined value, and later we will fill these variables with values that OpenPLC runtime sends using Modbus protocol.
To keep our inputs and outputs clearly separated in the address space, we have created folders FIOOutputs and FIOInputs in it.
It should be noted that the individual directives that we send to the OPC UA server node are sent using the Inject node type. Thus, these directives need to be set to execute automatically when the Node-RED program is started, and it is logical that the timing needs to be set so that the directives that create the folders are executed first, and then the variables are created. This will successfully create an OPC UA server with the desired address space.
We will use the following directives (but there are several supported): addFolder, setFolder and addVariable.
The directives are bound to the msg.payload of messages in Node-RED and the content itself to the msg.topic of messages. This can be seen in Figure 12, which shows the creation of the FIOOutputs folder. In msg.payload there is a command to add the folder and in msg.topic there is the defined namespace and folder name.
Adding the RetroreflectiveSensor1 variable would look like this, and it is obvious that the variable’s data type is also set:
  • msg.payload: {”opcuaCommand“:”addVariable”};
  • msg.topic: ns=1;s=RetroreflectiveSensor1;datatype=Boolean.
In order to be able to populate variables with data, we needed to create a custom function in JavaScript, since in Node-RED it is not necessary to use only the built-in nodes, it is also possible to create your own.
Notice in Figure 11 the node named Function: Modbus to OPC UA namespace, i.e., the node representing our own function. Specifically, we will describe the node that is connected to the node Modbus Read- %QX0.0-7. The Modbus Read- %QX0.0-7 node sends an array of 8 values (of type BOOL) to the Function: Modbus to OPC UA namespace node. Figure 13 shows the contents of the node. For each value received from Modbus, we have pre-prepared an empty variable (msg0, msg1, msg2,…) where we store the elements of the array. In their payload we store the value itself (of type BOOL), but the more interesting part is msg.topic. Here, according to the documentation of the OPC UA client installed in Node-RED, we need to define which variable in the OPC UA address space the variable will go to. Thus, we have defined the namespace ID (abbreviated ns), the variable name and the data type that matches the input variables obtained from Modbus server.
Then the Function: Modbus to OPC UA namespace node is connected to OPC UA client node, which stores the values in our OPC UA server.
We can also provide values from our OPC UA server to clients other than the client installed in Node-RED. Theoretically, this could be a client that does not have to run only on a computer, but also on a smartphone, tablet, in the cloud, etc.

6.1.5. Application in Microsoft Azure Cloud

One of the main objectives of the work was the implementation of a cloud application, which could be used to monitor discrete-event production system—to monitor the values of selected variables, to visualize the data appropriately, to process them efficiently and, if necessary, to intervene in the system.
At the beginning, it was necessary to determine what should be in the cloud application. The functional requirements were then determined:
  • Display of read values and action buttons in a dashboard;
  • Communication with Node-RED using the MQTT protocol;
  • Display of the number of manufactured (final) products handed over for dispatch;
  • Displaying the number of semi-finished products (pieces of raw material) that have entered production;
  • Displaying the number of semi-finished products/finished products that are currently on the conveyors (or in the system as such);
  • Graphical representation of the current temperature in the production hall;
  • Simple processing of the current temperature values in the production hall in order to raise an alarm if the temperature rises above a certain value;
  • Possibility of emergency intervention in the system-suspension and start-up of the production line.
The characteristics defined above are intended to describe what the application system (cloud application) being created will be able to accomplish. However, it is necessary to identify a second set of requirements that will not address the functionalities of the application. These will be the so-called qualitative, i.e., non-functional requirements:
  • The cloud application should have a simple and intuitive user interface;
  • Individual displayed variables should be part of a suitable object model, assuming appropriate use of Microsoft Azure cloud components;
  • The application should allow for easy extensibility by displaying additional variables, or the possibility of adding additional production lines, each with its own panel;
  • In terms of language internationalisation, the application should use English.
After the design, it was necessary to move on to the actual implementation. The most effective way is to use PaaS (Platform as a Service) services, i.e., to use ready developer tools to create your own cloud applications. The original plan was to bundle together multiple PaaS services, such as Azure IoT Hub for monitoring and connecting devices [31], Power BI for data visualisation [32], Azure Stream Analytics for data analytics [33], and Azure Functions for event callbacks [34], for example. During the course of the work, it was determined that the most effective solution would be to use the relatively new comprehensive aPaaS (application Platform as a Service) service Azure IoT Central [35], which combines the aforementioned functionalities.
Microsoft Azure IoT Central is used to connect and manage devices on a large scale and provides reliable data for business statistics, so it can be classified as an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system. It incorporates multiple PaaS services to create easily configurable, comprehensive and secure IoT solutions. A web-based user interface allows you to quickly connect devices, monitor device status, create rules, and manage millions of devices and their data throughout their lifecycle [35].
Azure IoT Central works similarly to Azure IoT Hub based on device twins, with each device based on a template. Device template is a so-called blueprint that defines the characteristics and behaviour of a device type. We then connect these devices to our application. For example, we can define the telemetry that a device sends so that IoT Central can create visualisations that use the right physical units and data types.
The device template we created is called template-factoryio. It contains the device models that we define for integration with our application. Each model has a unique ID and we also implement capabilities or semantic type for each model. The semantic type enables IoT Central, which can make some kind of assumption about how to treat the value.
The capabilities we can assign to our models are:
  • properties—data fields that represent the state of the device;
  • telemetry—telemetry (measurements) from sensors;
  • command—methods that users can execute on the device (e.g., control commands).
The structure of our device named conveyor-system1 is as follows, where the first entry is the system name and the second entry is the capability type: turnOn (command), turnOff (command), produced (telemetry), entered (telemetry), on_line (telemetry), temperature (telemetry), location (property).
The device connection is handled using SAS (Shared access signature) authentication. We connect our device model in the cloud to Node-RED using scope ID, Device ID and Primary key data.
We can then view the data that our cloud application receives. Notice Figure 14, where we can see three values that our cloud is receiving—Totally produced, Entered on line and Currently on line. Totally produced means how many products have been produced and submitted for shipment. Entered on line is the number of semi-finished products (pieces of raw material) placed on the conveyor belt. Currently on line is the number of actual semi-finished and finished products on the belt. There is also a map that can show where a given production is taking place. Next to it is a graph that shows us the air temperature in that factory. Since our production line is not real, we just simulate the temperature by generating random values in Node-RED in the range of 18 to 25. We can also send a signal from Node-RED during the application run that the air temperature is 100 degrees Celsius. In this case, we have implemented an event (alarm) on the Azure IoT Central side, which ensures that an email is sent to the authorised personnel. This demonstrates the basic form of data processing and evaluation based upon which the event is executed. Events in Azure IoT Central can be selected from predefined types or custom functions can be programmed using Azure Functions (serverless architecture).
We will briefly describe how the data are sent in Node-RED, using the example of the generation of temperature values (Figure 15). We start by using the timestamp node, which provides us with the cyclic execution of a given program flow. Next, we use the random node (named Temperature in Figure 15), which generates random integers from 18 to 25. This node goes into its own temperature function, where we insert an identifier into the msg.payload of our message that is identical to the identifier of the temperature variable in the cloud on the given device model (twin). We also have an inject 100 node ready, which we can manually push to send a temperature value of 100 degrees Celsius to simulate a fire on the production floor. Finally, the whole branch goes into the Azure IoT Central node where the device ID on the cloud and the access key is defined. In addition to this, the communication protocol is also defined here, in our case it is MQTT. One can also communicate over AMQP or HTTPS. We use the azure-iot-central 1.6.0 library.
We can also intervene in our virtual production system using the cloud application. We demonstrated this by implementing the ability to emergency pause and start the line. In Figure 14, we can see the buttons in the upper right corner that provide this.
First of all, it is needed to configure in Azure IoT Central node what commands this node listens for. In our case, these will be turnOff and turnOn. Another important element is the JavaScript functions that will respond to these commands from the cloud application (Figure 16). These functions must be registered in the context of our Node-RED flow (flow context). This is carried out (in the case of line suspend) using command flow.set(’turnOff’,turnOff);. The Azure IoT Central node takes care of the rest. After the JavaScript functions, we have other nodes connected to provide us with pause or start links. The command is sent to OpenPLC runtime using Modbus protocol, so we use nodes of type Modbus Write.

6.2. Case Study No. 2: CODESYS Linked with Node-RED and Microsoft Azure

In the second case study (Figure 17), instead of using a free and open-source PLC editor, we decided to use a comprehensive automation solution called CODESYS, which provides us with a connection to Factory I/O using the modern OPC UA communication standard. OPC UA server will run through CODESYS runtime and Factory I/O will act as OPC UA client. For control purposes, we do not need an intermediary (middleware) in the form of Node-RED. However, we will use Node-RED for capturing data and sending it to the cloud and it will also be used to provide emergency stop and start of production line that can be made by the user through the cloud application. The cloud application will again be implemented using Microsoft Azure and the communication will be secured by MQTT protocol. CODESYS can be used for academic purposes, but the limitation is that the runtime can only run continuously for 1 h in free mode, which would be very limiting in production.
The specification and behaviour of discrete-event system is the same as in the first case study.

6.2.1. Control of Discrete-Event System

As in the first case study, we need to control discrete-event system. In our first case study, we used open-source and runtime OpenPLC. Now it is replaced by CODESYS. We use the Structured text language to declare variables. The control program is written by Ladder diagram.
The main variables in the control program are the same as in the first case study. However we have also added additional variables that are related to the runtime measurement of the control system. In addition, compared to the first case study, we have the CYCLE_TIME block, which is of type “Function module”. We inserted this CYCLE_TIME using the external library OSCAT_BASIC version 3.3.4.0. We use it to measure how long the control system has been running for us.

6.2.2. Communication

The most important aspect of communication (Figure 18) in this case is the communication between CODESYS and Factory I/O, as it provides the control process. The communication is provided by the modern OPC UA protocol. CODESYS will now behave as OPC UA server and Factory I/O will behave as OPC UA client. Thanks to the existence of OPC UA server, we can view the variables in any OPC UA client. We will use Node-RED again in this case to share data to the cloud, but it is not needed for system control. We will communicate with the cloud via MQTT protocol.

6.2.3. OPC UA Server in CODESYS

CODESYS is relatively easy to work with. It is important to note that we need to name the variables so that Factory I/O can easily identify them and filter out the ones it needs. The entire OPC UA address space also contains a large number of different configuration and status variables that come with the CODESYS runtime. That is why all our useful variables have FIO prefix. We do this in order to be able to recognize our variables and make them easier to read, and most importantly, to be able to retrieve them easily in Factory I/O. In the Symbol configuration of the CODESYS project we select these variables, which actually specifies that they will be offered by the OPC UA server. Then we initialize CODESYS Control Win PLC, which is a softPLC running under Windows. Then, in the CODESYS project, we connect to this runtime and load a program into it. The connection is made by scanning the network and selecting the control unit, which can be the aforementioned softPLC or also a classic hardware PLC unit.
In Symbol configuration, we can click on our entire PLC_PRG program to mark all variables (Figure 19). In this way, all the variables we use are available in the OPC UA server. We then build and run the program.
In Factory I/O we open our scene and set the OPC Client DA/UA as driver in the configuration. We will specify opc.tcp://localhost:4840 as the server and set “FIO” as the variable filter, this will obtain our variables from the OPC UA address space as we mentioned above. We assign all the variables and the communication between Factory I/O and CODESYS is implemented (Figure 20).

6.2.4. Connection between CODESYS and Local Node-RED

After creating and running OPC UA server using CODESYS, we want to obtain the data using OPC UA to Node-RED, which runs on localhost (like OPC UA server). This will be provided by OPC UA Client node, where we set the same address as in the previous text (opc.tcp://localhost:4840). This way Node-RED acts as the OPC UA client. We accept all the variables we want to work with (Figure 21). On the left in Figure 21, we see nodes of type Inject querying each variable every second, defining the variable name in the msg.topic of the given message. The variable name is quite complex in the CODESZS OPC UA address space. We can see the names, and also the data, clearly in any OPC UA client, for example. There we can read that the ID of one of the variables is ns=4;s=|var|CODESYS Control Win V3 x64.Application.PLC_PRG.FIO_I_RetroreflectiveSensor1 and based on this ID we can query the variable in Node-RED.
It should be clarified the reason for running Node-RED on localhost. Similar to the previous case study, we want to use the cloud for discrete-event system monitoring and emergency intervention. Since our OPC UA server is running locally and we do not have a public (static) IP address, we will use localhost Node-RED to send data to the cloud and receive data from the cloud.
We will send our variables to the cloud using MQTT protocol. We will use MQTT-in node (acting as a subscriber) and MQTT-out node (acting as a publisher). These nodes will connect to the broker (server) that is implemented in the cloud. Specifically, this is the Aedes MQTT broker [36]. We will read our variables in the local Node-RED using OPC UA client, from which we extract individual data (variables) using our own Filter functions and send them to the cloud using MQTT. When sending data via MQTT, we need to set the corresponding MQTT topic for it. For example, for us it looks like inputs/FIO_I_RetroreflectiveSensor1.

6.2.5. Node-RED Dashboard in Microsoft Azure Cloud

In the first case study, we implemented a dashboard for system monitoring and emergency intervention using Azure IoT Central aPaaS service. In the second case study, we opted for a different approach. Node-RED also provides the possibility of implementing a dashboard, so as suitable option turned out to be to deploy Node-RED also in the cloud and create a dashboard using it.
Deploying Node-RED to the cloud is relatively easy, as it is actually an application running on the Node.JS runtime. So we used a virtual machine, specifically the Azure Virtual Machine IaaS service [37]. Azure Virtual Machine is one of several types of scalable on-demand compute resources that Azure offers. Before we create one, we need to think about a few things such as the application name, where the resources are stored, virtual machine size, operating memory, maximum number of virtual machines, operating system, configuration, and related resources. Further, it gives us the flexibility of virtualisation without having to buy and maintain the physical hardware on which it runs. We used a Linux-based operating system, specifically Ubuntu Server 20.04 (Focal).
Thus, we send data from the local Node-RED to the Node-RED in the cloud using the MQTT protocol. Here, we read the data, i.e., receive it using the MQTT protocol, and then display it in the dashboard. We use the node-reddashboard 3.1.6 library and node-red-contrib-ui-led 0.4.11 to display the data in the dashboard, since the nodes that allow us to do this are not part of the base installation and need to be installed separately. Table 2 gives us a more detailed description of Figure 22, where we can display data in the dashboard using these nodes.
Our final dashboard is shown in Figure 23. It is important to note that we can not only monitor the variables, but again we can also intervene in the production process in an emergency.

6.3. Case Study No. 3: OpenPLC Linked with Node-RED Acting as a Software IIoT Gateway

In the third case study (Figure 24), we will again use the free OpenPLC tool. However, let us imagine a situation where we want to use OpenPLC to control a system that can be remote (accessible via a local network or Internet). OpenPLC only supports the old protocol Modbus, but we want to access this remote system via the modern OPC UA standard for security reasons. Network elements are used for this - for example IIoT gateways, which, in simple terms, provide translation of Modbus messages into the OPC UA address space (and vice versa). In our case study, we will show a software implementation of an IIoT gateway using Node-RED, which can be implemented, for example, using a Raspberry Pi microcomputer. Thus, Node-RED will act as an OPC UA server and at the same time as a Modbus client. Factory I/O will be the OPC UA client and OpenPLC runtime will be the Modbus server.
Of course, such communication cannot be considered as real-time, so such a solution is only suitable for non-time-critical systems (e.g., in a smart home). The control of systems over a network, where substantial delays can occur, is the subject of a special area of control theory focusing on networked control.
For simplicity and greater clarity, we have chosen only a fragment of the production event system for demonstration (Figure 25). It is a simple system that contains parts from both case studies. In the case study, we will use OpenPLC, which will communicate using Modbus. Then the Modbus data will be converted using Node-RED to communicate via OPC UA to Factory I/O.

6.3.1. Control of Discrete-Event System

As in the previous case studies, we will need to control discrete-event system. In this third case study, we use open-source editor and runtime OpenPLC. In OpenPLC, we again use Ladder logic. However, in this case study we use only four global variables named Sensor_1 and Sensor_2, Conveyor_1 and Conveyor_2.
Sensor_1 checks if the product is on the conveyor belt, based on which we switch on the Conveyor_1 belt. Sensor_2 stops Conveyor_1 by sensing the product on the belt. We have the Conveyor_2 variable for the purpose of checking if we are communicating, so it is set to TRUE by default. So we can think of the whole process as moving the product from point A to point B, where it stops.

6.3.2. Communication

The communication will be between OpenPLC and Factory I/O. However, we want to communicate with Factory I/O using the modern OPC UA protocol. As we already know from previous case studies that OpenPLC cannot communicate with modern protocols, so we will need a so called intermediary (middleware). The intermediary in this case will be Node-RED. OpenPLC will communicate with Node-RED using the Modbus protocol and Node-RED will further communicate with Factory I/O using the OPC UA protocol. Node-RED will provide us with the encapsulation of Modbus data to OPC UA address space as we mentioned above.

6.3.3. Creation of OPC UA Server in Node-RED

In the local Node-RED, we first need to create an OPC UA server using the OPC UA server node (Figure 26) and the procedure already mentioned in the previous section. At the beginning, we create folders in the address space in order to have separate inputs and outputs in the address space. Next, we create 4 variables. These variables are the same as in OpenPLC and we named them fio_Sensor_1_Q1-0, fio_Sensor_2_Q1-1, fio_Conveyor_1_Q0-0 and fio_Conveyor_2_Q0-1.

6.3.4. Communication from OpenPLC to Factory I/O

First we need to describe how the communication from OpenPLC runtime towards Factory I/O works. From OpenPLC, Factory I/O needs to read the values of the outputs. Therefore, we need to read the outputs using the Modbus Read- %QX0.0-7 node, since the PLC program in OpenPLC evaluates whether a given Conveyor should be started or not. We connect this Modbus Read to our server, which we have called OpenPLC local, where we have again (as in the first case study) set the corresponding address 127.0.0.1 with port 502. Next, we again set the quantity to 1 (because we are reading 1 byte), the address to 0 (the outputs are available from address %QX0.0). This is a reading, so we set the function to FC: Read Coil Status.
Once we have read the values, we need to obtain them to OPC UA server so that Factory I/O can read them from it. Using the Conveyors: Modbus to OPC UA namespace custom function (Figure 27), we assign a specific msg.topic to the Modbus messages to ensure that the Modbus data are placed in the correct variable in the OPC UA address space. Sending the data to the OPC UA server is handled by the OPC UA client node.
The nodes at the bottom of Figure 27 are for program testing purposes only and specifically return the current value of the inputs from the Modbus server (addresses %QX1.0 and %QX1.1).
In Factory I/O, the input and output variables of the address space of the OPC UA server must be correctly assigned to the Factory I/O components (Figure 28).

6.3.5. Communication from Factory I/O to OpenPLC

In this subsection, we will show how the communication from Factory I/O towards the OpenPLC runtime takes place. Factory I/O needs to send values to the OpenPLC runtime from inputs, i.e., from sensors that detect the presence of a product. For this we need the variables fio_Sensor_1_Q1-0 and fio_Sensor_2_Q1-1, which we will send to OpenPLC. In Figure 29 we see on the left two nodes of type Inject named after specific variables. These nodes are queried every 500 ms for the values of these variables by the OPC UA client node. This node then returns the value of the first or second sensor, and this is detected using the custom functions that follow in the flow (functions starting with the word if). Depending on the type of value, the value is written using Modbus Write to address %QX1.0 (address 8 in Modbus) or %QX1.1 (address 9 in Modbus) in OpenPLC runtime.
In a similar way, a program in Node-RED could be extended to control an entire production line.

7. Discussion of Results

The presented work dealt with the current issue of convergence of information and operational technologies, which is related to the digitalisation of production processes. For the development of complex information systems in digital enterprises, it is necessary to use modern development tools (e.g., Node-RED), communication standards (OPC Unified Architecture) and also cloud technologies. Consequently, they need to be effectively interfaced with discrete-event systems. The case studies presented in this paper dealt with the modelling and control of virtual discrete-event systems implemented in Factory I/O and their communication with implemented cloud applications. The addressed issues are thus fully in line with the requirements of the industry regarding the creation of new educational materials for Industry 4.0 engineers. An advanced application for Industry 4.0 (that is also related to the convergence of IT and OT) is a digital twin. Digital twin creates a type of symmetry between real and virtual system.
It is essential for students to acquire knowledge and especially practical skills and competences in the field of technologies related to the digitalisation of products, production and related processes, which they can then use highly effectively as experts in the digitalisation of the enterprise in modern manufacturing companies of a wide range of focus. The evaluation of the module will be made possible by cooperation with partners from industrial practice, who will define the content needs of the implemented modules, which they will also use for the training of their experts. Such an approach will provide highly valuable feedback that will be used to modify both the formal and the content of the modules. This will ensure that the University’s students have up-to-date and required knowledge for industrial practice.
The courses will be designed for two groups of people, based on the nature of the convergence of IT and OT:
  • People focused on IT—computer engineers, software engineers, programmers, etc.
  • People focused on OT—automation engineers, mechatronics engineers, PLC programmers, etc.
The two groups will attend the courses together. The groups will therefore be mixed. This will ensure that they learn to work together and also acquire the necessary soft skills. Everyone will improve in the area (IT or OT) that is their weaker side.
The course can be divided into four parts and consists of a motivational introduction, basic IT concepts, basic OT concepts and finally the core of the course—the convergence of IT and OT.
  • Motivational introduction
    • Importance of IT and OT convergence, key aspects.
  • Basic IT concepts
    • Review of basic programming paradigms, functions, objects;
    • Object-oriented programming;
    • Cloud computing—basic aspects.
  • Basic OT concepts
    • Systems theory, overview of different types of cyber-physical systems, discrete-event systems;
    • Programming languages for PLC;
    • PLC programming.
  • Core of the course—convergence of IT and OT
    • Simulation tool Factory I/O;
    • Industry 4.0 concept, Reference Architectural Model Industrie 4.0 (RAMI 4.0);
    • OPC Unified Architecture;
    • Node-RED: basic programming;
    • Node-RED: communication with cloud and using OPC UA and MQTT;
    • Cloud computing—Microsoft Azure.

8. Conclusions

In conclusion, it can be stated that three educational studies have been created, which will be the basis for the creation of pilot courses for Industry 4.0 education. Their nature is to explain to the participants the convergence of information and operational technologies using practical examples. The case studies focus on the monitoring and control of virtual manufacturing systems, using two types of PLC runtimes, Node-RED flow-oriented programming tool, and cloud technologies.
The application benefits of the article can be summarised in the following points:
  • Modelling and control of virtual discrete-event system
    A virtual model of a production discrete-event system was created within the work, which was inspired by a real model available at the Institute of Automotive Mechatronics FEI STU in Bratislava, Slovakia. The control programs were created using ladder diagrams and were implemented using two development environments—OpenPLC and CODESYS.
  • Design and implementation of cloud applications
    Two cloud-based applications were designed and implemented for monitoring and emergency intervention of the production discrete-event system. The cloud applications were implemented in different ways. In the first case, the aPaaS service Azure IoT Central was used and in the second case, the IaaS service Azure Virtual Machine was used. This is an Ubuntu Linux based virtual machine where a dashboard (graphical user interface) created using Node-RED was deployed.
  • Implementation of a software IIoT gateway applicable for edge computing
    In the last case study, it was necessary to encapsulate data arriving via the Modbus protocol in the address space of OPC UA. This is commonly handled using hardware IIoT gateways or similar network elements. However, our solution is to implement a software IIoT gateway using the flow-oriented programming tool Node-RED, and this type of application can also be implemented in affordable microcomputers (e.g., Raspberry Pi). We can then place such a microcomputer at the edge of the network as an edge device.
  • Creation of the basis for pilot projects for the creation of educational materials for the training of engineers for Industry 4.0—pilot Engineer 4.0 programmes
    The nature of the prepared case studies, which combine operational and information technologies, predestines them to be used in the sphere of the education of engineers for the digitalisation of production processes.
In conclusion, the results are beneficial and can be further modified for the development of educational materials and technical practice in Industry 4.0.

Author Contributions

E.K. proposed the idea in this paper and prepared the software application; O.H., P.D. and J.C. designed the experiments, E.K. and P.D. performed the experiments; O.H., P.D. and E.K. analysed the data; E.K. wrote the paper; O.H., P.D. and J.C. edited and reviewed the paper; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Slovak research and Development Agency under the contract no. APVV-21-0125, by the Cultural and Educational Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic KEGA 016STU-4/2020 and 039STU-4/2021, by the Scientific Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic No. 1/0107/22.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank to Simona Lopatniková for helping with programming the implementation.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Kamal, S.; Al Mubarak, S.; Scodova, B.; Naik, P.; Flichy, P.; Coffin, G. IT and OT convergence-Opportunities and challenges. In Proceedings of the SPE Intelligent Energy International Conference and Exhibition, Aberdeen, Scotland, UK, 6–8 September 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shahroom, A.; Hussin, N. Industrial Revolution 4.0 and Education. Int. J. Acad. Res. Bus. Soc. Sci. 2018, 8, 314–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. González-Pérez, L.I.; Ramírez-Montoya, M.S. Components of Education 4.0 in 21st Century Skills Frameworks: Systematic Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Information Technology (in German). Available online: https://theastrologypage.com/information-technology (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  5. Operational Technology. Available online: https://www.gartner.com/en/information-technology/glossary/operational-technology-ot (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  6. What’s the Difference between IT and OT? Available online: https://www.3pillarglobal.com/insights/how-does-iiot-bring-it-and-ot-together/ (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  7. Huba, M.; Kozák, Š. From E-learning to Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Emerging e-Learning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), Stary Smokovec, Slovakia, 24–25 November 2016; pp. 103–108. [Google Scholar]
  8. Leiden, A.; Posselt, G.; Bhakar, V.; Singh, R.; Sangwan, K.; Herrmann, C. Transferring experience labs for production engineering students to universities in newly industrialized countries. In Proceedings of the IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (TSME-ICoME 2017), Bangkok, Thailand, 12–15 December 2017; Volume 297, p. 012053. [Google Scholar]
  9. Souza, R.G.d.; Quelhas, O.L.G. Model proposal for diagnosis and integration of industry 4.0 concepts in production engineering courses. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Assante, D.; Caforio, A.; Flamini, M.; Romano, E. Smart Education in the context of Industry 4.0. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Dubai, United Arab Emirates, 8–11 April 2019; pp. 1140–1145. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sackey, S.M.; Bester, A. Industrial engineering curriculum in Industry 4.0 in a South African context. S. Afr. J. Ind. Eng. 2016, 27, 101–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Ciolacu, M.; Svasta, P.M.; Berg, W.; Popp, H. Education 4.0 for tall thin engineer in a data driven society. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE 23rd International Symposium for Design and Technology in Electronic Packaging (SIITME), Constanta, Romania, 26–29 October 2017; pp. 432–437. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pierleoni, P.; Belli, A.; Palma, L.; Sabbatini, L. A versatile machine vision algorithm for real-time counting manually assembled pieces. J. Imaging 2020, 6, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Merkulova, I.Y.; Shavetov, S.V.; Borisov, O.I.; Gromov, V.S. Object detection and tracking basics: Student education. IFAC-PapersOnLine 2019, 52, 79–84. [Google Scholar]
  15. Dr, P.; Kumar, P.; Johri, P.; Srivastava, S.; Suhag, S. A Comparative Study of Industry 4.0 with Education 4.0. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference: Innovative Advancement in Engineering Technology (IAET), Jaipur, India, 21–22 February 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hussin, A.A. Education 4.0 Made Simple: Ideas For Teaching. Int. J. Educ. Lit. Stud. 2018, 6, 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Coşkun, S.; Kayıkcı, Y.; Gençay, E. Adapting Engineering Education to Industry 4.0 Vision. Technologies 2019, 7, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Mian, S.H.; Salah, B.; Ameen, W.; Moiduddin, K.; Alkhalefah, H. Adapting Universities for Sustainability Education in Industry 4.0: Channel of Challenges and Opportunities. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Grenčiková, A.; Kordoš, M.; Navickas, V. The impact of Industry 4.0 on education contents. Business Theory Pract. 2021, 22, 29–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Produktion2030 Ingenjör4.0. Available online: https://produktion2030.se/en/ingenjor-4-0/ (accessed on 27 December 2021).
  21. Chanthakit, S.; Rattanapoka, C. Mqtt based air quality monitoring system using node MCU and node-red. In Proceedings of the 2018 Seventh ICT International Student Project Conference (ICT-ISPC), Nakhonpathom, Thailand, 11–13 July 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  22. Langmann, R.; Stiller, M. The PLC as a Smart Service in Industry 4.0 Production Systems. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 3815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ferrari, P.; Flammini, A.; Rinaldi, S.; Sisinni, E.; Maffei, D.; Malara, M. Impact of Quality of Service on Cloud Based Industrial IoT Applications with OPC UA. Electronics 2018, 7, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lakhan, A.; Mohammed, M.A.; Abdulkareem, K.H.; Jaber, M.M.; Nedoma, J.; Martinek, R.; Zmij, P. Delay Optimal Schemes for Internet of Things Applications in Heterogeneous Edge Cloud Computing Networks. Sensors 2022, 22, 5937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Indexed Line with Two Machining Stations 24V—Simulation. Available online: https://www.fischertechnik.de/en/products/simulating/training-models/96790-sim-indexed-line-with-two-machining-stations-24v-simulation (accessed on 27 April 2022).
  26. Pajpach, M.; Haffner, O.; Kučera, E.; Drahoš, P. Low-Cost Education Kit for Teaching Basic Skills for Industry 4.0 Using Deep-Learning in Quality Control Tasks. Electronics 2022, 11, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Factory IO. Available online: https://docs.factoryio.com/ (accessed on 27 April 2022).
  28. OpenPLC Editor. Available online: https://openplcproject.com/docs/3-1-openplc-editor-overview/ (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  29. Philip Samuel, A.K.; Shyamkumar, A.; Ramesh, H. Industry 4.0-Connected Drives Using OPC UA. In Industry 4.0 and Advanced Manufacturing; Chakrabarti, A., Arora, M., Eds.; Springer: Singapore, 2021; pp. 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  30. Modbus Address Mapping. Available online: https://openplcproject.com/docs/2-5-modbus-addressing/ (accessed on 26 April 2022).
  31. Azure IoT Hub. Available online: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/iot-hub/ (accessed on 27 July 2022).
  32. Power BI. Available online: https://powerbi.microsoft.com/en-us/ (accessed on 27 July 2022).
  33. Azure Stream Analytics. Available online: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/stream-analytics/ (accessed on 27 July 2022).
  34. Azure Functions. Available online: https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/azure-functions/ (accessed on 27 July 2022).
  35. Azure IoT Central. Available online: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/iot-central/ (accessed on 27 July 2022).
  36. Aedes MQTT Broker. Available online: https://github.com/moscajs/aedes (accessed on 27 July 2022).
  37. Azure Virtual Machines. Available online: https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/virtual-machines/ (accessed on 27 July 2022).
Figure 1. IT and OT convergency.
Figure 1. IT and OT convergency.
Applsci 12 08802 g001
Figure 2. OpenPLC linked with Node-RED and Microsoft Azure.
Figure 2. OpenPLC linked with Node-RED and Microsoft Azure.
Applsci 12 08802 g002
Figure 3. Scheme of production system.
Figure 3. Scheme of production system.
Applsci 12 08802 g003
Figure 4. Overall view of the virtual production line.
Figure 4. Overall view of the virtual production line.
Applsci 12 08802 g004
Figure 5. Belt conveyor.
Figure 5. Belt conveyor.
Applsci 12 08802 g005
Figure 6. Retroreflective sensor and reflector.
Figure 6. Retroreflective sensor and reflector.
Applsci 12 08802 g006
Figure 7. Emitter.
Figure 7. Emitter.
Applsci 12 08802 g007
Figure 8. Remover.
Figure 8. Remover.
Applsci 12 08802 g008
Figure 9. Sequence diagram for the first case study.
Figure 9. Sequence diagram for the first case study.
Applsci 12 08802 g009
Figure 10. Factory I/O—Modbus client.
Figure 10. Factory I/O—Modbus client.
Applsci 12 08802 g010
Figure 11. Node-RED as Modbus client.
Figure 11. Node-RED as Modbus client.
Applsci 12 08802 g011
Figure 12. Creating OPC UA server and its address space in Node-RED.
Figure 12. Creating OPC UA server and its address space in Node-RED.
Applsci 12 08802 g012
Figure 13. Function for filling OPC UA server with values obtained using Modbus protocol from OpenPLC—Function: Modbus to OPC UA namespace.
Figure 13. Function for filling OPC UA server with values obtained using Modbus protocol from OpenPLC—Function: Modbus to OPC UA namespace.
Applsci 12 08802 g013
Figure 14. Dashboard in Azure IoT Central.
Figure 14. Dashboard in Azure IoT Central.
Applsci 12 08802 g014
Figure 15. Node-RED data sending flow (air temperature).
Figure 15. Node-RED data sending flow (air temperature).
Applsci 12 08802 g015
Figure 16. Flow in Node-RED ensuring the pause and start of conveyor belt.
Figure 16. Flow in Node-RED ensuring the pause and start of conveyor belt.
Applsci 12 08802 g016
Figure 17. CODESYS linked with Node-RED and Microsoft Azure.
Figure 17. CODESYS linked with Node-RED and Microsoft Azure.
Applsci 12 08802 g017
Figure 18. Sequence diagram for second case study.
Figure 18. Sequence diagram for second case study.
Applsci 12 08802 g018
Figure 19. Symbol configuration.
Figure 19. Symbol configuration.
Applsci 12 08802 g019
Figure 20. OPC UA Client Factory I/O.
Figure 20. OPC UA Client Factory I/O.
Applsci 12 08802 g020
Figure 21. Local Node-RED—OPC UA client.
Figure 21. Local Node-RED—OPC UA client.
Applsci 12 08802 g021
Figure 22. Node-RED in cloud.
Figure 22. Node-RED in cloud.
Applsci 12 08802 g022
Figure 23. Dashboard in Node-RED (cloud).
Figure 23. Dashboard in Node-RED (cloud).
Applsci 12 08802 g023
Figure 24. OpenPLC linked with Node-RED acting as a software IIoT gateway.
Figure 24. OpenPLC linked with Node-RED acting as a software IIoT gateway.
Applsci 12 08802 g024
Figure 25. Fragment of discrete-event system.
Figure 25. Fragment of discrete-event system.
Applsci 12 08802 g025
Figure 26. OPC UA server.
Figure 26. OPC UA server.
Applsci 12 08802 g026
Figure 27. Communication from OpenPLC to Factory I/O.
Figure 27. Communication from OpenPLC to Factory I/O.
Applsci 12 08802 g027
Figure 28. Factory I/O—connection.
Figure 28. Factory I/O—connection.
Applsci 12 08802 g028
Figure 29. Communication from Factory I/O to OpenPLC.
Figure 29. Communication from Factory I/O to OpenPLC.
Applsci 12 08802 g029
Table 1. Modbus server variables in OpenPLC engine [30].
Table 1. Modbus server variables in OpenPLC engine [30].
Modbus TableUsagePLC
Address
Modbus
Data Address
Data
Size
RangeAccess
Discrete Output
Coils
Digital
Outputs
%QX0.0–%QX99.70–7991 bit0 or 1RW
Discrete Input
Coils
Digital
Inputs
%IX0.0–%IX99.70–7991 bit0 or 1R
Analog Input
Registers
Analog
Input
%IW0–%IW10230–102316 bits0–65,535R
Analog Output
Holding registers
Analog
Outputs
%QW0–%QW10230–102316 bits0–65,535RW
Table 2. Variables in local Node-RED.
Table 2. Variables in local Node-RED.
Node TypeNode Name
ledS1–S7, C1–C6
gaugeTotally produced, Entered on line, Curently on line
textSystime
chartTemperature
buttonTurn On/Off
date pickerdate
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kučera, E.; Haffner, O.; Drahoš, P.; Cigánek, J. Educational Case Studies for Pilot Engineer 4.0 Programme: Monitoring and Control of Discrete-Event Systems Using OPC UA and Cloud Applications. Appl. Sci. 2022, 12, 8802. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178802

AMA Style

Kučera E, Haffner O, Drahoš P, Cigánek J. Educational Case Studies for Pilot Engineer 4.0 Programme: Monitoring and Control of Discrete-Event Systems Using OPC UA and Cloud Applications. Applied Sciences. 2022; 12(17):8802. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178802

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kučera, Erik, Oto Haffner, Peter Drahoš, and Ján Cigánek. 2022. "Educational Case Studies for Pilot Engineer 4.0 Programme: Monitoring and Control of Discrete-Event Systems Using OPC UA and Cloud Applications" Applied Sciences 12, no. 17: 8802. https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178802

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop