Next Article in Journal
Antimicrobial Resistance Distribution and Quorum-Sensing Regulation of Enterococcal Strains, Isolated from Hospitalized Patients
Previous Article in Journal
A Novel Approach to Grade Cotton Aphid Damage Severity with Hyperspectral Index Reconstruction
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Quasi-Static Motion Prediction Model of a Multi-Hull Navigation Vessel in Dynamic Positioning Mode

Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(17), 8759; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178759
by Mingyao Ji 1,*, Sharath Srinivasamurthy 1,2 and Yasunori Nihei 1
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Appl. Sci. 2022, 12(17), 8759; https://doi.org/10.3390/app12178759
Submission received: 6 August 2022 / Revised: 23 August 2022 / Accepted: 29 August 2022 / Published: 31 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Marine Science and Engineering)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

I send the review in the attachment.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper is interesting in terms of the subject it covers, but it has some handicaps as stated below.

1) In abstract section, Quadmaran vessel is mentioned as very general words in the first sentence, DP is mentioned in the second and third sentences, and DP movement of the mentioned ship is explained in the fourth sentence. There is an ambiguity here. This ambiguity should be removed in order to increase the readability of the paper.

2) In the introduction part of the paper, the literature has not been examined in detail and comprehensively. This section needs to be restructured and the literature section should be enriched with related studies.

3) The motivation of the paper should be explain in detail in the introduction section.

4) Figure qualities are very low. This problem should fixed.

5) Conclusion section of the paper is quite weak. This section should be strenghtened and findings of the study should discussed in detail.

Author Response

Please see the attachment

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

I would like to thank to the authors for finishing the revisions. The paper looks better. Authors have completed all requested revisions. This paper can be published with its current version.

Back to TopTop